DOCSLIB.ORG

Grangier2017 - Cours4.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 University Paris-Saclay - IQUPS Content of the Lecture Optical Quantum Engineering: From fundamentals to applications Philippe Grangier, Part 1 - Quantum optics with discrete and continuous variables Institut d’Optique, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique. 1.1 Homodyne detection and quantum tomography 1.2 Generating non-Gaussian Wigner functions : kittens, cats and beyond Lecture 1 (7 March, 9:15-10:45) : • Qubits, entanglement and Bell’s inequalities. Part 2 - Towards optical quantum networks Lecture 2 (14 March,11:00-12:30) : 2.1 Entanglement, teleportation, and quantum repeaters • From QND measurements to quantum gates and quantum information. 2.2 Some experimental achievements Lecture 3 (21 March, 9:15-10:45) : Part 3 - A close look to a nice single photon • Quantum cryptography with discrete and continuous variables. 3.1 Single photons: from old times to recent ones 3.2 Experimental perspectives Lecture 4 (28 March, 11:10-12:30) : • Non-Gaussian quantum optics and optical quantum networks. Quantum description of light Quantum description of light Discrete Photons Continuous Wave Discrete Photons Continuous Wave Parameters : Number of photons n Amplitude & Phase (polar) Quadratures X & P (cartesian) Destruction operators a A single "mode" of the α Creation operators a+ quantized electromagnetic field Number operator N = a+a φ (a plane wave, or a "Fourier transform limited" pulse) is described as a quantized harmonic oscillator : X = (a + a+)/√2 P = (a - a+)/i√2 operators a, a+, N = a+ a, etc... [ X, P ] = i Quantum description of light Quantum description of light Discrete Photons Continuous Wave Discrete Photons Continuous Wave Parameters : Number & Coherence Amplitude & Phase (polar) Parameters : Number & Coherence Amplitude & Phase (polar) Quadratures X & P (cartesian) Quadratures X & P (cartesian) Representation: Density matrix Wigner function W(X,P) Representation: Density matrix Wigner function W(X,P) ρ0,0 ρ0,1 ρ0,2 … Measurement : Counting : APD, VLPC, TES... Demodulation : Homodyne detection ρ ρ ρ … Local ρ = 1,0 1,1 1,2 Oscillator ρ2,0 ρ2,1 ρ2,2 … + Quantum state … … … … X = (a + a )/√2 P = (a - a+)/i√2 [ X, P ] = i Coherences < n | ρ | m > Heisenberg : ∆X. ∆P ≥ 1/2 Interference, then subtraction of measurement of both X and P photocurrents : measurement of Xθ = X cosθ + P sinθ V1 - V2 ∝ EOLEEQ(θ) ∝ Xθ = Xcosθ + Psinθ Homodyne detection Homodyne detection, Wigner Function and Quantum Tomography 2 2 2 - i θ LO * i θLO I1 = |ELO + ES| /2 = { |ELO| + |ES| + |ELO| (ES e + ES e ) }/2 2 2 2 – i θLO * i θLO • Quasiprobability density : I2 = |ELO - ES| /2 = { |ELO| + |ES| - |ELO| (ES e + ES e ) }/2 Wigner function W(X,P) – i θLO * i θLO I1 - I2 = |ELO| (ES e + ES e ) • Marginals of W(X, P) = |E | (E + E *) + => Probability distributions (Xθ) LO S S => √nLO ( a + a ) X meas. (θLO = 0) P • Probability distributions (Xθ) + P = |ELO| (ES - ES*)/i => √n ( a - a )/i P meas. (θ = π/2) LO LO => W(X, P) (quantum tomography) X and P do not commute : P ^ Heisenberg relation XLO W(X,P) 50/50 + Low-noise V(X) V(P) ≥ N 2 0 BS - amplifier θ 2.∆^X Signal Field E θ S Photodiode Phase control : P Measurement of X or P X Local Oscillator Field ELO (classical) X Homodyne detection, Quantum description of light Wigner Function and Quantum Tomography Discrete Photons Continuous Wave Parameters : Number & Coherence Amplitude & Phase (polar) Quadratures X & P (cartesian) Representation: Density matrix Wigner function W(X,P) Measurement : Counting : APD, VLPC, TES... Demodulation : Homodyne detection « Simple » Fock states Gaussian states states (number states) Sources : Sources : P ^ - Single atoms or molecules X Lasers : Non-linear media : LO - NV centers in diamond coherent states squeezed states - Quantum dots θ - Parametric fluorescence P P ^ .... 2.∆Xθ α α φ φ Squeezed State : X X X Gaussian Wigner Functions ∆X.∆P ≥ 1/2 Non-Gaussian States Non-Gaussian States Basic question : Basic question : amplitude & phase? Consider a single photon : can we measure its quadratures X & P ? amplitude & phase? Consider a single photon : can we speak about its quadratures X & P ? Can the Wigner function of Single mode light field Harmonic oscillator a Fock state n = 1 ( with all projections have Photons Quanta of excitation zero value at origin ) n photon state nth eigenstate be positive everywhere ? 2 Probability Pn(X) Probability |Ψn(x)| n=0 photons n=1 photon n=2 photons NO ! The Wigner function must be negative It is not a classical statistical distribution ! |Ψ (x)|2 n Hudson-Piquet theorem : for a pure state W is non-positive iff it is non-gaussian Many interesting properties for quantum information processing Wigner function of a single photon state ? (Fock state n = 1) Gaussian Wigner Function where ρ ˆ = 1 1 and N0 is the variance of the vacuum noise : Coherent Squeezed state |α〉 state Non-Gaussian One may have N = ! / 2 , N = 1/2 (theorists), N = 1 (experimentalists) 0 0 0 Wigner Function Using the wave function of the n = 1 state : one gets finally : Fock Cat state state |n=1〉 |α〉 + |α〉 P. Grangier, "Make It Quantum and Continuous", Science (Perspective) 332, 313 (2011) Content of the Lecture Part 1 - Quantum optics with discrete and continuous variables 1.1 Homodyne detection and quantum tomography 1.2 Generating non-Gaussian Wigner functions : kittens, cats and beyond Part 2 - Towards optical quantum networks 2.1 Entanglement, teleportation, and quantum repeaters 2.2 Some experimental achievements Part 3 - A close look to a nice single photon 3.1 Single photons: from old times to recent ones 3.2 Experimental perspectives Small sample, many more papers ! « Schrödinger’s Cat » state How to create a Schrödingers cat ? Suggestion by Hyunseok Jeong, proofs by Alexei Ourjoumtsev : • Classical object in a quantum superposition of distinguishable states • “Quasi - classical” state in quantum optics : coherent state | α 〉 Vacuum Squeezed Cat state |0〉 50/50 |squeezed cat〉 ! Fock |n〉 P ∆X.∆P = 1 P state |p|< ε : OK Homodyne |p|> ε : reject X Detection X Coherent state Schrödinger cat state ⇥ = c ( α α ) For n ≥ 3 the fidelity of the | odd cat⇥ o | ⇥| − ⇥ conditional state with a Squeezed Cat state is F ≥ 99% ⇥even cat = ce( α + α ) | ⇥ | ⇥ | − ⇥ 2 • Resource for quantum information processing Wigner function of a Size : α = n Schrödinger cat state Same Parity as n : θ = n*π • Model system to study decoherence Squeezed by : 3 dB Another hint… The rebirth of the cat p2/2 p2/2 Hn(p) e− H0(p0) e− 0 • Make a n-photon Fock state ⌦ 2 2 ! (p p0) /4 (p+p0) /4 Vacuum Hn((p p0)/p2) e− − e− = • 50/50 BS : ≈ n/2 photons transmitted |0〉 − (p2+p2)/2 Fock | n 〉 |ψ 〉 Hn((p p0)/p2) e− 0 R=50% state − p=0 : p2/2 n x2/2 Homodyne OK Hn(p/p2) e− x e− Detection Fourier transform! |P0|<<1 ⇒ OK Prepared state Cat state squeezed by 3 dB Homodyne measurement - Phase dependence For a large - Parity measurement : 〈P =0|2k+1〉 = 0 n (n ≥ 3) 0 Reflected : even number of photons Transmitted : same parity as n Squeezed cat state (from n=2) = √2/3 | 2 〉 - √1/3 | 0 〉 Experimental Set-up Resource : Two-Photon Fock States Femtosecond Ti-S laser pulses 180 fs , 40 nJ, rep rate 800 kHz Femtosecond laser SHG OPA n=0 APD OPA APD1 n=1 Homodyne APD2 1 -V 2 n=2 Experimental Wigner function V Homodyne detection (corrected for homodyne losses) Phys. Rev. Lett 96, 213601 (2006) Time Squeezed Cat State Generation Experimental Wigner function A. Ourjoumtsev et al, Nature 448, 784, 16 august 2007 Two-Photon State Preparation Homodyne Conditional Preparation : Success Probability = 7.5% ? ? JL Basdevant 12 Leçons de Mécanique Tomographic analysis Wigner function of the prepared state Quantique of the produced state Reconstructed with a Maximal-Likelihood algorithm Corrected for the losses of the final homodyne detection. Bigger cats : NIST (Gerrits, 3-photon subtraction), ENS (Haroche, microwave cavity QED), UCSB… Schrödinger cats with with continuous light beams Other methods for bigger / better cats... J. Etesse, M. Bouillard, B. Kanseri, and R. Tualle-Brouri, Groups of A. Furusawa (Tokyo), M. Sasaki (Tokyo), E. Polzik (Copenhagen), Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 193602 (2015) U. Andersen (Copenhagen), J. Laurat (Paris), .... Conditionnally prepared state : Fidelity 99% with an even cat state with α = 1.63, squeezed by s = 1.52 along x : N. Lee et al, Science 332, 330 (2011) Reconstructed Wigner function, corrected for losses. Schrödinger cats with microwaves in superconducting cavities Content of the Lecture Some examples... Serge Haroche group Part 1 - Quantum optics with discrete and continuous variables (cacity QED, Paris) Nature 455, 510 (2008) 1.1 Homodyne detection and quantum tomography 1.2 Generating non-Gaussian Wigner functions : kittens, cats and beyond Part 2 - Towards optical quantum networks Rob Schoelkopf group Atom field interaction: α e + α g 2.1 Entanglement, teleportation, and quantum repeaters (circuit QED, Yale) ⇤ | ⌅⇥| ⌅ | − ⌅⇥| ⌅ 2.2 Some experimental achievements Nature 495, 205 (2013) e + g Measure atom in state | ⌅ | ⌅ α + α Cats with 2, 3 or 4 "legs"... ⇧ 2 ⇤ | ⌅ | − ⌅ Part 3 - A close look to a nice single photon 3.1 Single photons: from old times to recent ones John Martinis group 3.2 Experimental perspectives (circuit QED, Santa Barbara) Nature 459, 546 (2009) Quantum state synthetizer Long distance quantum communications Long distance quantum communications How to fight against line losses ? How to fight against line losses ? Amplification a|+〉 + b|-〉 G G G a|+〉 + b|-〉 Amplification a|+〉 + b|-〉 G G G a|+〉 + b|-〉 1. Exchange |ψ 〉 of entangled B Quantum relays states |ψB〉 |ψB〉 |ψB〉 a|+〉 + b|-〉 Long distance quantum communications Long distance quantum communications How to fight against line losses ? How to fight against line losses ? Amplification a|+〉 + b|-〉 G G G a|+〉 + b|-〉 Amplification a|+〉 + b|-〉 G G G a|+〉 + b|-〉 1.
Recommended publications
  • Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman

    Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman

    Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman Louis de Broglie Norman Ramsey Willis Lamb Otto Stern Werner Heisenberg Walther Gerlach Ernest Rutherford Satyendranath Bose Max Born Erwin Schrödinger Eugene Wigner Arnold Sommerfeld Julian Schwinger David Bohm Enrico Fermi Albert Einstein Where discovery meets practice Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology IQ ST in Baden-Württemberg . Introduction “But I do not wish to be forced into abandoning strict These two quotes by Albert Einstein not only express his well­ more securely, develop new types of computer or construct highly causality without having defended it quite differently known aversion to quantum theory, they also come from two quite accurate measuring equipment. than I have so far. The idea that an electron exposed to a different periods of his life. The first is from a letter dated 19 April Thus quantum theory extends beyond the field of physics into other 1924 to Max Born regarding the latter’s statistical interpretation of areas, e.g. mathematics, engineering, chemistry, and even biology. beam freely chooses the moment and direction in which quantum mechanics. The second is from Einstein’s last lecture as Let us look at a few examples which illustrate this. The field of crypt­ it wants to move is unbearable to me. If that is the case, part of a series of classes by the American physicist John Archibald ography uses number theory, which constitutes a subdiscipline of then I would rather be a cobbler or a casino employee Wheeler in 1954 at Princeton. pure mathematics. Producing a quantum computer with new types than a physicist.” The realization that, in the quantum world, objects only exist when of gates on the basis of the superposition principle from quantum they are measured – and this is what is behind the moon/mouse mechanics requires the involvement of engineering.
  • Ion Trap Nobel

    Ion Trap Nobel

    The Nobel Prize in Physics 2012 Serge Haroche, David J. Wineland The Nobel Prize in Physics 2012 was awarded jointly to Serge Haroche and David J. Wineland "for ground-breaking experimental methods that enable measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems" David J. Wineland, U.S. citizen. Born 1944 in Milwaukee, WI, USA. Ph.D. 1970 Serge Haroche, French citizen. Born 1944 in Casablanca, Morocco. Ph.D. from Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Group Leader and NIST Fellow at 1971 from Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Professor at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and University of Colorado Collège de France and Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France. Boulder, CO, USA www.college-de-france.fr/site/en-serge-haroche/biography.htm www.nist.gov/pml/div688/grp10/index.cfm A laser is used to suppress the ion’s thermal motion in the trap, and to electrode control and measure the trapped ion. lasers ions Electrodes keep the beryllium ions inside a trap. electrode electrode Figure 2. In David Wineland’s laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, electrically charged atoms or ions are kept inside a trap by surrounding electric fields. One of the secrets behind Wineland’s breakthrough is mastery of the art of using laser beams and creating laser pulses. A laser is used to put the ion in its lowest energy state and thus enabling the study of quantum phenomena with the trapped ion. Controlling single photons in a trap Serge Haroche and his research group employ a diferent method to reveal the mysteries of the quantum world.
  • Nobel 2012: Trapped Ions and Photons

    Nobel 2012: Trapped Ions and Photons

    FEATURES Nobel 2012: Trapped ions and photons l Michel Brune1, Jean-Michel Raimond1, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji 1,2 - DOI: 10.1051/epn/2012601 l 1 Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, ENS, CNRS, UMPC Paris 6, 24 rue Lhomond, 75005 Paris, France l 2 Collège de France, 11 place Marcelin Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France m This colorized The 2012 Nobel prize in physics has been awarded jointly to Serge Haroche image shows the fluorescence from three (Collège de France and Ecole Normale Supérieure) and David Wineland (National trapped beryllium ions illuminated with Institute for Standards and Technology, USA) “for ground-breaking experimental an ultraviolet laser methods that enable measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems”. beam. Black and blue areas indicate lower intensity, and red and white higher intensity. hat are these methods, why are they For instance, Einstein and Bohr once imagined weighing NIST physicists used jointly recognized? a photon trapped forever in a box, covered by perfect three beryllium ions to demonstrate a crucial The key endeavour in the last century mirrors. These gedankenexperiments and their “ridicu- step in a procedure that of quantum physics has been the explo- lous consequences”, as Schrödinger once stated, played could enable future ration of the coupling between matter and electromag- a considerable role in the genesis of quantum physics quantum computers W to break today's netic radiation. For a long time, the available experimental interpretation. The technical progress made these most commonly used techniques were limited to a large number of atoms and experiments possible. One can now realize some of the encryption codes.
  • Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited

    Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited

    Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited Wojciech H. Zurek This paper has a somewhat unusual origin and, as a consequence, an unusual structure. It is built on the principle embraced by families who outgrow their dwellings and decide to add a few rooms to their existing structures instead of start- ing from scratch. These additions usually “show,” but the whole can still be quite pleasing to the eye, combining the old and the new in a functional way. What follows is such a “remodeling” of the paper I wrote a dozen years ago for Physics Today (1991). The old text (with some modifications) is interwoven with the new text, but the additions are set off in boxes throughout this article and serve as a commentary on new developments as they relate to the original. The references appear together at the end. In 1991, the study of decoherence was still a rather new subject, but already at that time, I had developed a feeling that most implications about the system’s “immersion” in the environment had been discovered in the preceding 10 years, so a review was in order. While writing it, I had, however, come to suspect that the small gaps in the landscape of the border territory between the quantum and the classical were actually not that small after all and that they presented excellent opportunities for further advances. Indeed, I am surprised and gratified by how much the field has evolved over the last decade. The role of decoherence was recognized by a wide spectrum of practic- 86 Los Alamos Science Number 27 2002 ing physicists as well as, beyond physics proper, by material scientists and philosophers.
  • Gravitational Cat State: Quantum Information in the Face of Gravity

    Gravitational Cat State: Quantum Information in the Face of Gravity

    Gravitational Cat State: Quantum Information in the face of Gravity Bei ‐ Lok Hu (U. Maryland, USA) ongoing work with Charis Anastopoulos (U. Patras, Greece) ‐‐ EmQM15, Vienna, Austria Oct. 23‐25, 2015 Based on C. Anastopoulos and B. L. Hu, “Probing a Gravitational Cat State” Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 165022 (2015). [arXiv:1504.03103] ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ PITP UBC ‐ 2nd Galiano Island Meeting, Aug. 2015, DICE2014 Castiglioncello, Italy Sept, 2014; Peyresq 20, France June 2015 (last few slides courtesy CA) ‐ RQI‐N (Relativistic Quantum Information) 2014 Seoul, Korea. June 30, 2014 COST meeting on Fundamental Issues, Weizmann Institute, Israel Mar 24‐27, 2014 Three elements: Q I G Quantum, Information and Gravity • Quantum Quantum Mechanics Quantum Field Theory Schroedinger Equation | | micro •Gravity Newton Mechanics General Relativity | Macro • GR+QFT= Semiclassical Gravity (SCG) • Laboratory conditions: | Strong Field Conditions: Weak field, nonrelativistic limit: | Early Universe, Black Holes Newton Schrodinger Eq (NSE) | Semiclassical Einstein Eq Two layers of theoretical construct: (1 small surprise, 1 observation) 1) Small Surprise?: NSE for single or multiple particles is not derivable from known physics C. Anastopoulos and B. L. Hu, Problems with the Newton‐Schrödinger Equations New J. Physics 16 (2014) 085007 [ arXiv:1403.4921] Newton‐Schrodinger Eq <=/= Semiclassical Einstein Eqn of Semiclassical Gravity (this nomenclature is preferred over Mller‐Rosenfeld Eq) Semiclassical Gravity Semiclassical Einstein Equation (Moller-Rosenfeld):
  • Metrological Complementarity Reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox

    Metrological Complementarity Reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox

    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22353-3 OPEN Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen paradox ✉ Benjamin Yadin1,2,5, Matteo Fadel 3,5 & Manuel Gessner 4,5 The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox plays a fundamental role in our understanding of quantum mechanics, and is associated with the possibility of predicting the results of non- commuting measurements with a precision that seems to violate the uncertainty principle. 1234567890():,; This apparent contradiction to complementarity is made possible by nonclassical correlations stronger than entanglement, called steering. Quantum information recognises steering as an essential resource for a number of tasks but, contrary to entanglement, its role for metrology has so far remained unclear. Here, we formulate the EPR paradox in the framework of quantum metrology, showing that it enables the precise estimation of a local phase shift and of its generating observable. Employing a stricter formulation of quantum complementarity, we derive a criterion based on the quantum Fisher information that detects steering in a larger class of states than well-known uncertainty-based criteria. Our result identifies useful steering for quantum-enhanced precision measurements and allows one to uncover steering of non-Gaussian states in state-of-the-art experiments. 1 School of Mathematical Sciences and Centre for the Mathematics and Theoretical Physics of Quantum Non-Equilibrium Systems, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. 2 Wolfson College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 3 Department of Physics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 4 Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, ENS-Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Collège de France, Paris, France. 5These authors contributed equally: Benjamin Yadin, Matteo Fadel, ✉ Manuel Gessner.
  • El Premio Nobel De Fısica De 2012

    El Premio Nobel De Fısica De 2012

    El premio Nobel de f´ısica de 2012 Jose´ Mar´ıa Filardo Bassalo* Abstract Palabras clave: Premio nobel de f´ısica de 2012; Haroche y In this article we will talk about the 2012 Nobel Prize in Phy- Wineland, manipulacion´ cuantica.´ sics, awarded to the physicists, the frenchman Serge Haroche and the north-american David Geffrey Wineland for ground- Serge Haroche breaking experimental methods that enable measuring and ma- El premio nobel de f´ısica (PNF) de 2012 fue con- nipulation of individual quantum systems. cedido a los f´ısicos, el frances´ Serge Haroche (n. 1944) y el norteamericano David Geffrey Wine- Keywords: 2012 Physics Nobel Prize; Haroche and Wineland; Quantum Manipulation. land (n. 1944) por el desarrollo de tecnicas´ experimen- tales capaces de medir y manipular sistemas qu´ımi- Resumen cos individuales por medio de la optica´ cuanti-´ En este art´ıculo trataremos del premio nobel de f´ısica de 2012 ca. Con todo, emplearon tecnicas´ distintas y comple- concedido a los f´ısicos, el frances´ Serge Haroche y al norteame- mentarias: Haroche utilizo´ fotones de atomos´ carga- ricano David Geffrey Wineland por el desarrollo de tecnicas´ ex- dos (iones) entrampados; Wineland entrampo´ los io- perimentales capaces de medir y manipular sistemas cuanticos´ nes y empleo´ fotones para modificar su estado individuales. cuantico.´ *http://www.amazon.com.br Recibido: 16 de abril de 2013. Comencemos viendo algo de la vida y del trabajo de es- Aceptado: 09 de octubre de 2013. tos premiados, as´ı como la colaboracion´ en estos temas 5 6 ContactoS 92, 5–10 (2014) por algunas f´ısicos brasilenos,˜ por ejemplo Nicim Za- gury (n.
  • Programme 66Th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting 26 June – 1 July 2016 MEETING APP TABLE of CONTENTS

    Programme 66Th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting 26 June – 1 July 2016 MEETING APP TABLE of CONTENTS

    Programme 66th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting 26 June – 1 July 2016 MEETING APP TABLE OF CONTENTS WANT TO STAY UP TO DATE? Download the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings App. Available in Android, iTunes and Windows app stores. (“Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings”) Scientific Programme page 8 About the Meetings page 32 • Up to date programme info & details • Session abstracts and Supporters poster abstracts page 36 • Ask questions during panel discussions • Participate in polls and Maps page 44 surveys • Interactive maps • Connect to other Good to Know page 52 participants • Social media integration Download the app (Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings) in Android, iTunes or Windows Phone app stores. Within the app, use the passphrase “darkmatter” to download the guide for the 66th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting. 2 3 WELCOME WELCOME The 66th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting is characterised by continuity and partners. Many of his strategic initiaves paved the way of the meetings into transition alike: a successful future. The members of the Lindau Council and Foundation are grateful for his years of dedicated service to Lindau’s Mission Education. Back in 1951, the driving intention of the founders Dr. Franz Karl Hein, Pro- fessor Dr. Gustav Wilhelm Parade and Count Lennart Bernadotte was the Every year, we are challenged by the young scientists to further increase vision that this gathering in Lindau, an island very close to its European interaction with Nobel Laureates, to provide more opportunities for young neighbours, could contribute to reconciliation after the second world war, students to present their work, and to enable even more exchange. A new and foster a peaceful and prosperous future.
  • Arxiv:1610.07046V2 [Quant-Ph] 5 Aug 2017

    Arxiv:1610.07046V2 [Quant-Ph] 5 Aug 2017

    Cat-state generation and stabilization for a nuclear spin through electric quadrupole interaction Ceyhun Bulutay1, ∗ 1Department of Physics, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey (Dated: July 10, 2018) Spin cat states are superpositions of two or more coherent spin states (CSSs) that are distinctly separated over the Bloch sphere. Additionally, the nuclei with angular momenta greater than 1/2 possess a quadrupolar charge distribution. At the intersection of these two phenomena, we devise a simple scheme for generating various types of nuclear spin cat states. The native biaxial electric quadrupole interaction that is readily available in strained solid-state systems plays a key role here. However, the fact that built-in strain cannot be switched off poses a challenge for the stabilization of target cat states once they are prepared. We remedy this by abruptly diverting via a single rotation pulse the state evolution to the neighborhood of the fixed points of the underlying classical Hamiltonian flow. Optimal process parameters are obtained as a function of electric field gradient biaxiality and nuclear spin angular momentum. The overall procedure is seen to be robust under 5% deviations from optimal values. We show that higher level cat states with four superposed CSS can also be formed using three rotation pulses. Finally, for open systems subject to decoherence we extract the scaling of cat state fidelity damping with respect to the spin quantum number. This reveals rates greater than the dephasing of individual CSSs. Yet, our results affirm that these cat states can preserve their fidelities for practically useful durations under the currently attainable decoherence levels.
  • Quantum Mechanics Quantum Optics

    Quantum Mechanics Quantum Optics

    Quantum Mechanics_quantum optics History of quantum optics Light propagating in a vacuum has its energy and momentum quantized according to an integer number of particles known as photons. Quantum optics studies the nature and effects of light as quantized photons. The first major development leading to that understanding was the correct modeling of theblackbody radiation spectrum by Max Planck in 1899 under the hypothesis of light being emitted in discrete units of energy. The photoelectric effect was further evidence of this quantization as explained by Einstein in a 1905 paper, a discovery for which he was to be awarded the Nobel Prize in 1921. Niels Bohrshowed that the hypothesis of optical radiation being quantized corresponded to his theory of the quantized energy levels of atoms, and the spectrum of discharge emission from hydrogen in particular. The understanding of the interaction between light and matter following these developments was crucial for the development of quantum mechanics as a whole. However, the subfields of quantum mechanics dealing with matter-light interaction were principally regarded as research into matter rather than into light; hence one rather spoke ofatom physics and quantum electronics in 1960. Laser science—i.e., research into principles, design and application of these devices—became an important field, and the quantum mechanics underlying the laser's principles was studied now with more emphasis on the properties of light[dubious – discuss], and the namequantum optics became customary. As laser science needed good theoretical foundations, and also because research into these soon proved very fruitful, interest in quantum optics rose. Following the work of Dirac in quantum field theory, George Sudarshan, Roy J.
  • Media Information #Lino16 Programme Announcement

    Media Information #Lino16 Programme Announcement

    Kuratorium für die Tagungen der Nobelpreisträger in Lindau Council for the Media Information Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings Ehrenpräsident | Honorary President #LiNo16 programme announcement: Quantum technology Prof. Dr. h. c. mult. Graf Lennart Bernadotte af Wisborg (†) Will quantum technologies radically change the world? Vorstand | Executive Commitee Countess Bettina Bernadotte af Wisborg It is more than 100 years since physicists first described phenomena (Präsidentin | President) Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Lubitz which went beyond the bounds of classical, Newtonian physics. Within (Vizepräsident | Vice-President) a few decades, quantum mechanics had formulated a theory that Prof. Dr. Helga Nowotny (Vizepräsidentin | Vice-President) sketches a world which contradicts our day-to-day ideas in many ways. Nikolaus Turner (Schatzmeister | Treasurer) In the microcosm of nature, something can be a particle and a wave at the same time, the results of measurements are affected by the Stiftung observation, and physical quantities can occur only in specific portions, Lindauer Nobelpreisträgertagungen Foundation the quanta. This first quantum revolution has fundamentally changed Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings the way we see nature, and its scientific description has also provided Ehrenpräsidium | Honorary Presidents the physical foundations for pioneering developments, such as Prof. Dr. h. c. mult. Graf Lennart Bernadotte af Wisborg (†) computer chips, lasers, nuclear magnetic resonance tomography and Prof. Dr. Roman Herzog GPS. Today, we stand at the threshold of a new technological revolution Bundespräsident a. D. that is driven by quantum physics and whose influence we cannot even Vorstand | Board of Directors Jürgen Kluge begin to assess at the present time. Is this second quantum revolution (Vorsitzender | Chairman) Bettina Gräfin Bernadotte af Wisborg going to radically change our world? This will be among the key Thomas Ellerbeck th Reinhard Pöllath questions discussed at the 66 Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting.
  • The Links of Chain of Development of Physics from Past to the Present in a Chronological Order Starting from Thales of Miletus

    The Links of Chain of Development of Physics from Past to the Present in a Chronological Order Starting from Thales of Miletus

    ISSN (Online) 2393-8021 IARJSET ISSN (Print) 2394-1588 International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 5, Issue 10, October 2018 The Links of Chain of Development of Physics from Past to the Present in a Chronological Order Starting from Thales of Miletus Dr.(Prof.) V.C.A NAIR* Educational Physicist, Research Guide for Physics at Shri J.J.T. University, Rajasthan-333001, India. *[email protected] Abstract: The Research Paper consists mainly of the birth dates of scientists and philosophers Before Christ (BC) and After Death (AD) starting from Thales of Miletus with a brief description of their work and contribution to the development of Physics. The author has taken up some 400 odd scientists and put them in a chronological order. Nobel laureates are considered separately in the same paper. Along with the names of researchers are included few of the scientific events of importance. The entire chain forms a cascade and a ready reference for the reader. The graph at the end shows the recession in the earlier centuries and its transition to renaissance after the 12th century to the present. Keywords: As the contents of the paper mainly consists of names of scientists, the key words are many and hence the same is not given I. INTRODUCTION As the material for the topic is not readily available, it is taken from various sources and the collection and compiling is a Herculean task running into some 20 pages. It is given in 3 parts, Part I, Part II and Part III. In Part I the years are given in Chronological order as per the year of birth of the scientist and accordingly the serial number.