DOCSLIB.ORG

Specific Requirements of the EU Structural Instruments and Policy Implications for Romania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Specific Requirements of the EU Structural Instruments and Policy Implications for Romania A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Cojanu, Valentin; Dima, Alina; Muşetescu, Radu; Pîslaru, Dragoş; Stănculescu, Manuela Research Report Specific requirements of the EU structural instruments and policy implications for Romania Pre-Accession Impact Studies II, No. 6 Provided in Cooperation with: European Institute of Romania, Bucharest Suggested Citation: Cojanu, Valentin; Dima, Alina; Muşetescu, Radu; Pîslaru, Dragoş; Stănculescu, Manuela (2004) : Specific requirements of the EU structural instruments and policy implications for Romania, Pre-Accession Impact Studies II, No. 6, European Institute of Romania, Bucharest This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/74614 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu European Institute of Romania – Pre-accession Impact Studies II European Institute of Romania Study no. 6 Specific Requirements of the EU Structural Instruments and Policy Implications for Romania Authors: Valentin Cojanu, Senior Lecturer - coordinator Alina Dima, Assistant Radu Muşetescu, Assistant Dragoş Pîslaru, Lecturer Manuela Stănculescu, Ph.D. Candidate European Institute of Romania, Bucharest, 2004 1 European Institute of Romania – Pre-accession Impact Studies II Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................4 I. Introduction................................................................................................................4 II. The Regional Policy of the European Union........................................................ 8 II. 1 Economics of regional development in the EU context .............................................. 8 Public transfers and capabilities........................................................................................................... 8 Convergence and regional development ............................................................................................. 10 II. 2 The policy for regional development.......................................................................... 12 The Structural Funds........................................................................................................................... 14 The Cohesion Policy............................................................................................................................ 21 II. 3 The future of EU regional policy................................................................................ 23 II. 4 The Experience of Spain ............................................................................................. 29 Structural programming...................................................................................................................... 30 Project Management and Monitoring ................................................................................................. 31 III. Structural Funds issues in the enlargement process ..........................................35 III. 1 Outcome of negotiations ......................................................................................... 36 III. 2 Pre-accession funds ................................................................................................. 38 Phare................................................................................................................................................... 38 ISPA..................................................................................................................................................... 44 SAPARD .............................................................................................................................................. 49 III. 3 The experience of Poland........................................................................................ 51 Accession negotiations ........................................................................................................................ 52 Outcome of negotiations and further challenges................................................................................. 54 IV. Accession impact on the policy of Structural Instruments in Romania.............55 IV. 1 Administrative capacity: legislation, institutions, programming........................ 56 Regional Development Planning in Romania ..................................................................................... 57 Development regions and regional statistics....................................................................................... 62 The management of pre-accession funds............................................................................................. 69 The management of structural funds ................................................................................................... 78 Structural Funds and the regional aid policy...................................................................................... 81 IV. 3 Managerial capacity: financing and budget.......................................................... 82 Institutional analyses........................................................................................................................... 84 The impact of the 1997 and 1998 PHARE operational country programs.......................................... 88 Technical and managerial expertise in structural programming........................................................ 91 V. Conclusions and policy implications .......................................................................96 V. 1 The framework of regional policy .............................................................................. 96 V. 2 Implications from the enlargement process .............................................................. 97 V. 3 Implications from the experience of Romania .......................................................... 99 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 102 Annex.................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2 European Institute of Romania – Pre-accession Impact Studies II Tables and Figures Tabel 1: Programs for rural development financed by EAGGF................................................................... 16 Table 2: Reform of the Cohesion Policy - Instruments and objectives ......................................................... 28 Table 3: Effects of the Intervention of Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund on GDP and rate of employment (RE) (% as in case of non-intervention) ................................................................................... 33 Table 4: Management and implementation authorities in former candidate countries................................ 40 Table 5: Difficulties in complying with Structural Funds requirements in Poland ...................................... 55 Table 6: Priority 5 – Regional development: Context indicators ................................................................. 60 Table 7: Allocation of 2004 – 2006 regional funds by region ...................................................................... 61 Table 8: Historical regions and cultural areas in Romania ......................................................................... 63 Table 9: Development regions and development sub-regions ...................................................................... 64 Table 10: Redefinition of NUTS classification.............................................................................................. 69 Table 11: PHARE Annual Assistance to Romania (Mil. Euros) ................................................................... 72 Table 12: Stimulation and solidarity in the allocation of public funds by region and by county ................. 86 Tabel 13: Technical Assessment Matrix – Excerpt of Financial selection criteria....................................... 94 Figure 1: Development index at the county level.............................................................. 68 Figure 2A: Institutional framework for Structural Funds management in Romania Error! Bookmark not defined. 3 European Institute of Romania – Pre-accession Impact Studies II Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Mr. Leonard Orban, Secretary of State at the Ministry of European Integration, and Ms.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    bcc: Romania Country Team, ECAEX TEAM Public Disclosure Authorized Week 44 Economic News Political News Sector News Romania Keeps 72nd Rank in Doing Nominee to European Court of Selling of EUR82M Worth of Business 2013 Report. The country Auditors Rejected. The European Electricity by Hidroelectrica. maintained its 72 spot in the 185- Parliament rejected the Minister of The insolvent energy producer country Ease of Doing Business European Affairs Leonard Orban, the Hidroelectrica plans to sell 1.7 report, due to two reforms that made it country’s nominee to the European terawatts of electricity on the local Public Disclosure Authorized easier to start a business and Court of Auditors. Read more. energy exchange OPCOM for a strengthened its legal framework for total of EUR82 million, according secured credit transactions. Read Visit of Martin Schulz. President of the to OPCOM data. Read more. more. European Parliament (EP), Martin Schulz, will arrive in Romania on Two Hundred Romanians Payments Pre-suspended for Three October 30 and will visit, along with Targeted by Railway Fraud EU-Funded Programs Worth Premier Victor Ponta, the water Probe. About 200 people, mainly EUR10.5B. The European treatment plant in Târgu Jiu, not train conductors and controllers, Commission decided to pre-suspend considering this involvement in the were put under investigation payments for transport, regional elections campaign. On October 31, within a vast operation against development and economic Schulz will deliver a speech in railway fraud launched by the competitiveness programs, due to Parliament and at the Central University authorities. The passenger railway irregularities in the fund management Library, and will meet with President company registered losses of system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of European Union Accession in Democratisation Processes
    The role of European Union accession in democratisation processes Published by Democratic Progress Institute 11 Guilford Street London WC1N 1DH United Kingdom www.democraticprogress.org [email protected] +44 (0)203 206 9939 First published, 2016 DPI – Democratic Progress Institute is a charity registered in England and Wales. Registered Charity No. 1037236. Registered Company No. 2922108. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee or prior permission for teaching purposes, but not for resale. For copying in any other circumstances, prior written permission must be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable.be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable 2 The role of European Union accession in democratisation processes Contents Foreword: ...................................................................................5 Abbreviations: ............................................................................7 Introduction: ..............................................................................8 I. European Union accession and democratisation – An overview .............................................................................11 A) Enlargement for democracy – history of European integration before 1993 ........................................................11 • Declaration on democracy, April 1978, European Council: .........................................................12 B) Pre accession criteria since 1993 and the procedure of adhesion ..........................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Sourcebook on Environmental Funds in Economies in Transition
    SOURCEBOOK ON ENVIRONMENTAL FUNDS IN ECONOMIES IN TRANSITION A Regional Overview and Surveys of Selected Environmental Funds in Central and Eastern Europe and the New Independent States Edited by: Patrick Francis Jürg Klarer Nelly Petkova ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th of September 1961, the organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: • to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; • to contribute to sound economic expansion in the Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and • to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), and the Republic of Korea (12th December 1996). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention).
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN UNION – the INSTITUTIONS Subject IAIN MCIVER Map
    SPICe THE EUROPEAN UNION – THE INSTITUTIONS subject IAIN MCIVER map This subject map is one of four covering various aspects of the European Union. It provides information on the five institutions of the European 21 May 2007 Union. The institutions manage the way in which the EU functions and the way in which decisions are made. Scottish Parliament The other subject maps in this series are: 07/02 The European Union – A Brief History (07/01) The European Union – The Legislative Process (07/03) The European Union – The Budget (07/04) Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) Briefings are compiled for the benefit of the Members of the Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with MSPs and their staff who should contact Iain McIver on extension 85294 or email [email protected]. Members of the public or external organisations may comment on this briefing by emailing us at [email protected]. However, researchers are unable to enter into personal discussion in relation to SPICe Briefing Papers. If you have any general questions about the work of the Parliament you can email the Parliament’s Public Information Service at [email protected]. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in SPICe briefings is correct at the time of publication. Readers should be aware however that briefings are not necessarily updated or otherwise amended to reflect subsequent changes. www.scottish.parliament.uk 1 THE EU INSTITUTIONS The way the EU functions and the way decisions are made is determined by the institutions which have been established by the member states to run and oversee the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Economica
    UNIVERSITATEA DE VEST „VASILE GOLDI Ş” din ARAD FACULTATEA DE ŞTIIN ŢE ECONOMICE, INFORMATIC Ǎ ŞI INGINERIE REVISTA DE CERCETARE ŞI STUDIU ECONOMICA SERIA LICEN ŢĂ ŞI MASTER VOLUMUL 1 ISSUE 3/2017 „Vasile Goldi ş” University Press Arad Universitatea de Vest „Vasile Goldi ş” din Arad Revista de cercetare şi studiu Economica Seria Licen ţă şi Master Vol. 1 Issue 3/2017 2 „Vasile Goldi ş” University Press Arad - ISSN: 2393-1310 Adresa web: http://rce-fse.uvvg.ro Universitatea de Vest „Vasile Goldi ş” din Arad Revista de cercetare şi studiu Economica CONSILIUL ŞTIIN ŢIFIC Pre şedinte: Prof.univ.dr. Haiduc Cristian – Decan, Facultatea de Ştiin ţe Economice, Informatic ǎ şi Inginerie, Universitatea de Vest „Vasile Goldi ş din Arad” Membrii: Prof.univ.dr. Ardelean Dorina - Universitatea de Vest „Vasile Goldi ş” din Arad Prof.univ.dr. Boldea Iulian - Prorector, Universitatea „Petru Maior” din Tîrgu Mure ş Prof.univ.dr. Dumescu Florin - Universitatea de Vest „Vasile Goldi ş” din Arad Prof.univ.dr. Şoim Hora ţiu - Universitatea de Vest „Vasile Goldi ş” din Arad Prof.univ.dr. Schebesch Klaus B. - Universitatea de Vest „Vasile Goldi ş” din Arad Prof.univ.dr. B ădulescu Alina – Universitatea din Oradea Prof.univ.dr. Petroman Ioan – USMAVB „ Regele Mihai I al României” din Timi şoara Conf.univ.dr. Anghelina Andrei - Prorector, Universitatea de Vest „Vasile Goldi ş” din Arad Conf.univ.dr. V ădăş an Ioana – Universitatea de Vest din Timi şoara Conf.univ.dr. Boi ţă Marius - Universitatea de Vest „Vasile Goldi ş” din Arad Conf.univ.dr. Milin Anda - USAMVB "Regele Mihai I al României" din Timi şoara COLEGIUL DE REDAC ŢIE Redactor şef : Conf.univ.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 11012411.Pdf
    Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna DOTTORATO DI RICERCA Cooperazione Internazionale e Politiche per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile International Cooperation and Sustainable Development Policies Ciclo XX Settore/i scientifico disciplinari di afferenza: Storico, politico e sociale SPS/13 DEVELOPMENT DISCOURSE IN ROMANIA: from Socialism to EU Membership Presentata da: Mirela Oprea Coordinatore Dottorato Relatore Prof. Andrea Segrè Prof. Stefano Bianchini Esame finale anno 2009 - 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With their accession to the European Union, twelve new countries - Romania among them - (re)entered the international community of international donors. In the history of development aid this can be seen as a unique event: it is for the first time in history that such a large number of countries become international donors, with such short notice and in such a particular context that sees some scholars announcing the ‘death’ of development. But in spite of what might be claimed regarding the ‘end’ of the development era, development discourse seems to be rather vigorous and in good health: it is able to extert an undeniable force of attraction over the twelve countries that, in a matter of years, have already convinced themselves of its validity and adhered to its main tenets. This thesis collects evidence for improving our understanding of this process that sees the co-optation of twelve new countries to the dominant theory and practice of development cooperation. The evidence collected seems to show that one of the tools employed by the promoters of this co-optation process is that of constructing the ‘new’ Member States as ‘new’, inexpert donors that need to learn from the ‘old’ ones.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL FACTS Official Name: Romania Capital City: Bucharest (2,064 Million Inhabitants)
    ADVERTISER’S SUPPLEMENT Sunday Observer December 1, 2019 79 GENERAL FACTS Official name: Romania Capital city: Bucharest (2,064 million inhabitants). Full of history and culture, Bucharest, is even called “Little Paris’’ Area: 238,391 sq km H. E. Klaus Werner Iohannis H. E. Ludovic Orban H. E. Bogdan Lucian Aurescu Land use: 61.7% (of which 39.5 % President of Romania Prime Minister of Romania Minister of Foreign Affairs arable land) Forest: 28% Other: 10.3% Border length: 3,150 km Neighboring countries: Bulgaria, THE ROMANIAN STATE Hungary, Republic of Moldavia, Serbia, Ukraine * According to the Constitution, Romania is Romania, since 22 nd December 2014 and Judiciary: Independence guaranteed by the Romanian Presidency was the informal European Population: 22,171 million a sovereign and independent, unitary and reelected on 24 th November 2019. Superior Council of the Magistracy; judges are Council that brought together EU heads of state inhabitants with the indivisible national state. The Legislative power: The Parliament of irremovable. or government in historical city of Sibiu, on 9 permanent residence in * Form of government: Republic. Romania, (588 members), divided into two Today, Romania is a modern European Union May 2019. EU leaders focused on strategic plans Romania (January 2019). * The state is organized according to the chambers: the Senate of Romania (176 members) Country with a dynamic economy and excellent for the Union in the coming years. principle of separation and balance of the and the Chamber of Deputies (412 members). human potential, a country fully engaged in the The diplomatic relations between Romania Ethnic structure: Romanians: powers – the Legislative, the Executive and Next Parliamentary election will be held in European Union and the Euro-Atlantic and Sri Lanka date back to the 15th of September 88.9%, Hungarian the Judiciary, in the framework of 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Public Private Partnerships in New Europe
    Developing Public Private Partnerships in New Europe *connectedthinking Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Section 1 The need for investment and the role of PPPs Background 7 What are PPPs? 9 Why undertake PPPs? 10 PPPs in the Member States 10 A role for PPPs? 14 Section 2 PPPs and the EU Introduction 15 PPPs in an EU context 17 EU procurement rules and PPPs 17 Accounting and statistical rules for PPPs 19 State Aid issues and PPPs 20 Funding initiatives 21 The role of the EIB 22 The need for a joined up approach to the PPP market in Europe 22 Section 3 Combining EU funding with private finance Introduction 23 Review of co-financing using private funding 25 Review of absorption levels 27 The use of private finance as a means of co-financing 29 Practical issues of co-financing EU funded projects with private funding 30 The Challenge 31 Developing hybrid procurement and funding structures 32 Preparedness of Member States to develop PPP projects 33 Support requirements 34 Section 4 Recommendations and conclusions Recommendations for promoting the development of PPPs 35 Conclusions 39 Appendices EIB funded PPP projects by country and sector 40 EU funding relevant to infrastructure development 41 Glossary 42 Contacts 43 Executive Summary The need for investment public sector officials do not have experience and the role of PPPs of implementing such projects. They therefore need to develop new skills and capabilities in An ‘infrastructure gap’ exists in Europe. order to undertake PPP procurements This has a negative impact on economic growth effectively. This requires an investment on and the prosperity of the citizens of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonard Orban
    Mr Leonard Orban Commissioner designate for multilingualism Introductory statement European Parliament Hearing Brussels, 27-11-2006 13:00-16:00 Room PHS 1 A 2 Titles in italics are meant to support the reading, not to be read 1 Mr President, Honourable Members, May I say, first of all, that I am deeply honoured to be here today. I am extremely happy to see so many of you, whom I have already had the privilege to meet in the course of the last weeks. On 1 January next, when Bulgaria and Romania become full members of what I consider the world’s most farsighted political undertaking, we shall have taken another historic step towards the realisation of the European project of Unity in Diversity. I cannot tell you how much it means to me, both as a citizen of Romania and as one of its former chief negotiators, to see my country join the European family you represent on the peaceful path that the Union is treading towards the goals of prosperity, solidarity and security. I am deeply committed to European integration, and I would like to assure you that, if confirmed, as a Commissioner I will do my best to make a substantial contribution to move this fascinating European project forward. I am truly honoured by the confidence President Barroso has placed in me as Commissioner designate for Multilingualism, a portfolio that touches the very substance of European identity, since the values and challenges lying in integration, competitiveness, inclusiveness, cohesion, mobility, transparency and democracy are vital to the future of the European project and intimately linked to multilingualism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of EU Funds in Macedonia
    The use of EU funds in Macedonia Efficiency, impact and absorption capacity и Collection of studies Working version European Policy Institute November, 2012 Contents Emilija Taseva: IPA COMPONENT I FOR EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONS GUARANTEEING DEMOCRACY, RULE OF LAW, HUMAN RIGHTS, PROTECTION OF MINORITIES IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA .................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Enlargement Policy and Pre-accession Assistance: Copenhagen Political Criteria in Focus ... 7 IPA strengthening democracy, rule of law, human rights and protection of minorities in Republic of Macedonia 9 Implementation of IPA Component I: initial experiences and prospects for efficiency, absorption and impact ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................................................... 16 Drilon Iseni: IPA - “INCENTIVE FOR PROSPEROUS ACTIONS”, CASE STUDY:CROSS-BORDER COOPERATIONIPA PROGRAMME MACEDONIA - ALBANIA 2007-2013 .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Land Management and Taxation Practices
    Capacity Building and Improving Environment for Municipal Practice in Land Management and Taxation NALAS Task Force on Urban Planning CAPACITY BUILDING AND IMPROVING ENVIRONMENT FOR MUNICIPAL PRACTICE IN LAND MANAGEMENT AND TAXATION NALAS Task Force on Urban Planning Report November 2015 Capacity Building and Improving Environment for Municipal Practice in Land Management and Taxation CONTENTS This Report is a collaborative effort of the NALAS Task Force on Urban Planning (TF UP) 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Izidor Jerala, Association of Municipalities and Towns of Slovenia (Host of the Task Force on Urban Planning) 2. Introduction: The relationship between property taxation and urban development ................................ 6 Indrit Gradeci, Albanian Association of Communes 2.1. Stages of land development ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Azra Agic, Association of Municipalities and Cities of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Andjelina Osap, Association of Towns and Municipalities of Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2.2. Types of taxation on land use .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Siya Shehtanova, National Association of Municipalities
    [Show full text]
  • Romania Diagnostic Jakov Milatovic and Mateusz Szczurek
    Romania Diagnostic Jakov Milatovic and Mateusz Szczurek January 2020 This report was prepared by Jakov Milatovic, Principal Economist at the Economics, Policy and Governance (EPG) department at the EBRD, under the supervision of Mateusz Szczurek, the Lead Regional Economist, and analytical support of Dan Meshulam, intern at EPG. Important contributions to the analysis were made by Dimitris Sourvanos and Oleg Levitin on political economy and governance, Kjetil Tvedt on the state of transport and municipal infrastructure, Dejan Vasiljev on access to finance, Marko Stermsek and Elias Habbar-Baylac on labour market, gender and inclusion issues, Giorgio Manenti on knowledge economy, and Philipp Paetzold on value chains analysis. We are grateful for guidance and comments provided by Mattia Romani (Managing Director, EPG), Artur Radziwill (Director, Country Economics and Policy) and Peter Sanfey (Deputy Director, Country Economics and Policy). We are also grateful to numerous other colleagues in EPG for helpful contributions. The report has benefited from comments from EBRD colleagues in other departments, including Banking, Office of the Chief Economist, Office of the General Counsel, Country Strategy and Results Management, Energy Efficiency and Climate Change. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors only and not necessarily those of the EBRD. The report is based on latest available data. Country diagnostics are an EBRD tool to identify the main obstacles to entrepreneurship and private sector development and to help shape the Bank’s strategic priorities and project selection in new country strategies. Each diagnostic informs the EBRD’s policy engagement with the authorities in the country. Each country diagnostic assesses the progress and challenges of the country of operations in developing a sustainable market economy.
    [Show full text]