Evaluation of Fodder Trees for Goats
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Locusts in Queensland
LOCUSTS Locusts in Queensland PEST STATUS REVIEW SERIES – LAND PROTECTION by C.S. Walton L. Hardwick J. Hanson Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the many people who provided information for this assessment. Clyde McGaw, Kevin Strong and David Hunter, from the Australian Plague Locust Commission, are also thanked for the editorial review of drafts of the document. Cover design: Sonia Jordan Photographic credits: Natural Resources and Mines staff ISBN 0 7345 2453 6 QNRM03033 Published by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld. February 2003 Information in this document may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, provided that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Land Protection Department of Natural Resources and Mines GPO Box 2454, Brisbane Q 4000 #16401 02/03 Contents 1.0 Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Taxonomy.................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 History ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Outbreaks across Australia ........................................................................................ 3 3.2 Outbreaks in Queensland........................................................................................... 3 4.0 Current and predicted distribution ........................................................................ -
Potential Impact of Desert Locust to Nutrition Security in SOMALIA
POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DESERT LOCUST Emma Apo Ouma TO NUTRITION SECURITY IN SOMALIA WHAT IS THE CURRENT SITUATION? •Triple threat of Desert Locust, Gu flooding and COVID-19, •April and June 2020, an estimated 2.7 million people across Somalia are expected to face Crisis and deteriorate to 3.5 million between July and September 2020 WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR NUTRITION SECURITY? CROP AND PASTURE DAMAGE Threat to current Gu season crop production and may also threaten pasture availability and crop cultivation across Somalia through the following 2020 Deyr (October-December A swarm can eat enough food in one day to feed 34 million people. FALLING LIVESTOCK PRICES •Livestock diseases •Poor livestock nutrition; increased price of livestock feed •Reduced quality of livestock products eg milk, meat LOSS OF LIVELIHOODS •Disruption of food systems; critical value chains have been affected e.g. livestock, cereals such as sorghum, maize •Loss of wage and employment opportunities e.g. labor in the fields, value chain actors •Increase in livelihood based coping strategy: eg selling last breeding animal, spent savings, begging, reduced expenditure on livestock and agriculture •Reduced spending on non-food needs health care, education FOOD CONSUMPTION AND DIETARY DIVERSITY •With poor harvests, there is likelihood of poor food consumption at hhd level •Depletion of food stocks •Food Prices have increased •A majority if households rely on markets for food: increased reliance on purchased and processed foods •Compromise the nutrition of the most vulnerable: children less than 5, PLW, elderly, adolesents •Increased rates of acute malnutrition ONGOING EFFORTS Household Level Screening and referral of acute malnutrition cases Targeting of the most vulnerable (UCT) Community level ▪Burying locusts, setting fires, and making noise to scare them off. -
Honey Locust: Identification and Management by James M
Honey Locust: Identification and Management by James M. Locke NF-SO-11-01 Honey locust (Gleditisia triacanthos L.) is a native tree species also known as honey-shucks locust, sweet-locust, three-thorned acacia, sweet-bean or thorny locust. It has a natural range that extends from central Pennsylva- nia to South Dakota to southeastern Texas to Alabama. This range was probably expanded by Native Ameri- cans, who used the wood, pods and seeds for several purposes, and later by wildlife and ornamental plantings. It is best adapted to moist, bottom- land soils, but can survive on a wide variety of sites. Honey locust is often one of the first trees to occupy an area that was once woods, was cleared and is reverting back to woods. It is a moderately fast growing tree that has proven to be hardy and tolerant of drought conditions and saline soils. Identification The honey locust is a leguminous tree or a member of the Pea family (Fabaceae). At maturity, trees may be 70 to 80 feet tall and 2 to 3 feet in diameter at breast height, although under ideal conditions they may be up to 140 feet tall and 5 to 6 feet in diameter at breast height. The bark is medium to dark gray or brown with elongated plate-like patches separated by furrows. These plate-like patches may produce warty growths resulting in a rough trunk texture. Honey locust leaf arrangement is alternate, and its leaves are doubly4 Top photo: A mature honey locust tree growing on an upland site. -
Restricted Invasive Plants of Queensland
Restricted invasive plants Restricted invasive plants of Queensland Restricted invasive plants of Queensland Hudson pear (Cylindropuntia rosea syn. Cylindropuntia pallida) Fireweed (Senecio madagascariensis) Mother-of-millions (Kalanchoe delagoense) Bunny ears (Opuntia microdasys) The new Biosecurity Act The Biosecurity Act 2014 protects Queensland’s economy, Species not listed as restricted may be listed as prohibited biodiversity and people’s lifestyles from the threats posed under the Act or may be listed by a local government level by invasive pests and diseases under local laws. Under the Act, certain species of invasive plants are listed Australian Government legislation administered by the as ‘restricted’ biosecurity matter. Australian Department of Agriculture also applies to the import of all plants into Australia. What is restricted matter? • Mexican bean tree (Cecropia pachystachya, C. palmata and C. peltata) Restricted matter is listed in the Act and includes a range • Mexican feather grass (Nassella tenuissima) of invasive plants that are present in Queensland. These invasive plants are having significant adverse impacts • miconia (M. calvescens, M. cionotricha, M. nervosa in Queensland and it is desirable to manage them and and M. racemosa) prevent their spread, thereby protecting un-infested • mikania vine (Mikania micrantha) parts of the State. • mimosa pigra (Mimosa pigra) The Act requires everyone to take all reasonable and practical measures to minimise the biosecurity risks • bunny ears (Opuntia microdasys) associated with invasive plants and animals under • riverina prickly pear (Opunita elata) their control. This is called a general biosecurity obligation (GBO). • water mimosa (Neptunia oleracea and N. plena). The specific restriction requirements also apply to a Restricted invasive plants that are person when dealing with restricted invasive matter. -
Honeylocust Plant Bug.Pub
CORNELL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION OF ONEIDA COUNTY 121 Second Street Oriskany, NY 13424-9799 (315) 736-3394 or (315) 337-2531 FAX: (315) 736-2580 Honeylocust Plant Bugs Honey locust plant bug has been getting a lot of attention this year because of large numbers of honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos) that were late to leaf out. While this insect causes significant dam- age there are many other pests that can disfigure honeylocust. Some of the common pests include honeylocust pod gall midge, mimosa webworm, calico scale and honeylocust spider mite. If you need to treat for any of these insects on honeylocust keep in mind broad spectrum insecticides can kill natural enemies of the honeylocust spidermite and result in future mite outbreaks. Take that into consideration when reviewing your management options, and if treatment options include horticultural oils, insecticidal soap, spinosad or Bacillus thuringiensis choose one of these. They have little or no impact on spider mites’ natural enemies. Honeylocust Plant bug (Diaphnocoris chlorionis) One of the great difficulties in controlling this pest is that it be- comes active almost as soon as the tender leaves begin to emerge. The insects initially hang out within folded leaves where they are well camouflaged and can be easily overlooked. Hosts Honeylocust only Description and Life Cycle; The Honeylocust plant bug has one generation per year. It over winters as eggs in the bark of 2-3 year old twigs. As the buds begin to open, the eggs hatch, and the pale green nymphs crawl onto unfolding leaflets where they are subtly visible. They have short wing buds that don’t reach the ends of their bod- ies. -
Honey Locust Gleditsia Triacanthos Including Cultivars and Varieties
Restricted invasive plant Prohibited invasive plant Honey locust Gleditsia triacanthos including cultivars and varieties Honey locust is a large, rapidly growing tree. In the past it They can also cause damage to tractor, quad bike and has been deliberately promoted and planted in Australia other vehicle tyres, restricting vehicle movement near as a fodder tree and garden ornamental. infestations. Even when the plant has died, its spines can continue to inflict injury Honey locust is an invasive tree capable of out-competing and replacing native vegetation. It can often create dense Honey locust can also provide a haven for introduced pest monocultures, thereby providing restricted habitats for animals such as foxes, cats and rabbits. native fauna. The plant’s long, strong spines can inflict serious injuries and infections to humans, livestock and wildlife. Legal requirements Habitat and distribution Honey locust (Gleditsia spp. including cultivars and Honey locust was originally introduced from North America varities) is a category 3 restricted invasive plant under the and planted in Queensland in 1907 as a fodder and Biosecurity Act 2014. It must not be given away, sold, or ornamental tree. It was first reported as a pest in 1955 at released into the environment. The Act requires everyone Cressbrook Creek (Esk Shire). Honey locust exists naturally to take all reasonable and practical steps to minimise the across the United States from Mexico in the south to risks associated with invasive plants under their control. Ontario, Canada, in the north. This is called a general biosecurity obligation (GBO). This fact sheet gives examples of how you can meet your GBO. -
Guidance for POP Pesticides
Guidance for POP pesticides 1. Background on POP pesticides POPs Pesticides originate almost entirely from anthropogenic sources and are associated largely with the manufacture, use and disposition of certain organic chemicals. Of the initial 12 POPs chemicals, eight are POPs pesticide. In the new POP list, five chemicals may be categorised as pesticides. These are alpha hexachlorocyclohexane (alpha-HCH), beta hexachlorocyclohexane (beta-HCH), Chlordecone, Lindane (gamma, 1,2,3,4,5,6- hexaclorocyclohexane) and Pentachlorobenzene. This module addresses baseline data gathering and assessment of POPs pesticides. Particular care is required to address DDT due to its use for vector control and Lindane due to its use for control of ecto-parasites in veterinary and human application, which may be under the responsibility of authorities other than those responsible for primarily agricultural chemicals. In addition, it is important that all uses of HCB, alpha hexachorocyclohexane, beta hexachlorocyclohexane and pentachlorobenzene (industrial as well as pesticide) be properly addressed. Specialists with knowledge of each of these areas might be included in the task teams. 2. Objective To review and summarize the production, use, import and export of the chemicals listed in Annex A and Annex B of the Convention (excluding other chemicals listed under Annex A and B which are not considered as pesticides). To gather information on stockpiles and wastes containing, or thought to contain, POPs pesticides. To assess the legal and institutional framework for control of the production, use, import, export and disposal of the chemicals listed in Annex A and Annex B (excluding other chemicals which are not classed as pesticides) of the Convention. -
Texas Big Tree Registry a List of the Largest Trees in Texas Sponsored by Texas a & M Forest Service
Texas Big Tree Registry A list of the largest trees in Texas Sponsored by Texas A & M Forest Service Native and Naturalized Species of Texas: 320 ( D indicates species naturalized to Texas) Common Name (also known as) Latin Name Remarks Cir. Threshold acacia, Berlandier (guajillo) Senegalia berlandieri Considered a shrub by B. Simpson 18'' or 1.5 ' acacia, blackbrush Vachellia rigidula Considered a shrub by Simpson 12'' or 1.0 ' acacia, Gregg (catclaw acacia, Gregg catclaw) Senegalia greggii var. greggii Was named A. greggii 55'' or 4.6 ' acacia, Roemer (roundflower catclaw) Senegalia roemeriana 18'' or 1.5 ' acacia, sweet (huisache) Vachellia farnesiana 100'' or 8.3 ' acacia, twisted (huisachillo) Vachellia bravoensis Was named 'A. tortuosa' 9'' or 0.8 ' acacia, Wright (Wright catclaw) Senegalia greggii var. wrightii Was named 'A. wrightii' 70'' or 5.8 ' D ailanthus (tree-of-heaven) Ailanthus altissima 120'' or 10.0 ' alder, hazel Alnus serrulata 18'' or 1.5 ' allthorn (crown-of-thorns) Koeberlinia spinosa Considered a shrub by Simpson 18'' or 1.5 ' anacahuita (anacahuite, Mexican olive) Cordia boissieri 60'' or 5.0 ' anacua (anaqua, knockaway) Ehretia anacua 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, Carolina Fraxinus caroliniana 90'' or 7.5 ' ash, Chihuahuan Fraxinus papillosa 12'' or 1.0 ' ash, fragrant Fraxinus cuspidata 18'' or 1.5 ' ash, green Fraxinus pennsylvanica 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, Gregg (littleleaf ash) Fraxinus greggii 12'' or 1.0 ' ash, Mexican (Berlandier ash) Fraxinus berlandieriana Was named 'F. berlandierana' 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, Texas Fraxinus texensis 60'' or 5.0 ' ash, velvet (Arizona ash) Fraxinus velutina 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, white Fraxinus americana 100'' or 8.3 ' aspen, quaking Populus tremuloides 25'' or 2.1 ' baccharis, eastern (groundseltree) Baccharis halimifolia Considered a shrub by Simpson 12'' or 1.0 ' baldcypress (bald cypress) Taxodium distichum Was named 'T. -
3K 45 Attack of the Urban Forest Eaters.PMD
The attack of the urban forest eaters: how a dedicated and educated group of volunteers is responding to the invasion of Asian long-horn beetles and gypsy moths in Chicago Julie Sacco Abstract The concept of biodiversity is largely unfamiliar to and unembraced by the general public. The overdeveloped nature of urban habitats and the underdeveloped awareness of their human inhabitants lead to a perception by the general public that one tree is as green as the next, and that most insects should be squashed on sight. TreeKeepers are trained citizen foresters who volunteered for the Openlands Project to help maintain the health of Chicago’s green infrastructure. In a unique partnership with Chicago’s Bureau of Forestry and the Chicago Park District, TreeKeepers serves as a national model for interagency cooperation, public-private partnerships, and advocacy on behalf of the urban forest. Since 1991, over 500 people from almost every neighborhood in Chicago have taken the 7-week TreeKeeper training course to learn basic arboriculture skills including tree identification and physiology, soils, planting and pruning techniques, tree disease, and insect problem recognition. Tree Keepers volunteer on workdays in different parks and along Chicago’s boulevards to help city crews with tree maintenance and other greening activities. In January of 1998, TreeKeepers were invited to an informational workshop presented by the Illinois Department of Agriculture (IDA) and Chicago’s Bureau of Forestry (CBOF) about the spread of the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) in Chicago, and on monitoring efforts being launched later in the year. Attendees, including CBOF staff, learned that the gypsy moth had been defoliating its way westward since its accidental release from a lab in Medford, Massachusetts, in 1869. -
Specifications Downtown Glenwood Springs 7Th Street Landscaping
Specifications Downtown Glenwood Springs 7th Street Landscaping Shannon Murphy Landscape Architects 1-25-19 Revised 3-21-19 Project Manager DDA Representative Presently Deric Walter, Boundaries Unlimited 970.945.5252 Landscape Architect Shannon Murphy Landscape Architects 970.927.2889 SECTION 01300 SUBMITTALS PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 REQUIREMENTS INCLUDED The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the PROJECT MANAGER for approval all submittals required by the General Conditions and these Specification sections. 1.02 INSURANCE CERTIFICATES Refer to General Conditions for submittal requirements. Submit updated certificates as necessary to verify current coverage. 1.03 SCHEDULE OF VALUES Refer to General Conditions for requirements. On bid items to be paid as lump sum that may extend beyond a single pay estimate, a schedule of values shall be submitted to OWNER a minimum of 10 days prior to work on that item. Adequate detail shall be given to allow a value to be placed on work completed during any given pay estimate. Where payment is to be based on unit bid prices, correlate schedule of values with Divisions and Sections of Specifications unless otherwise approved by the PROJECT MANAGER. If separate payment is to be requested for materials suitably stored but not installed, segregate delivered costs from installation costs, including overhead and profit. 1.04 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE (See Section 01310 for Construction Schedule Submittal details). 1.05 SHOP DRAWINGS (See Section 01340 for Shop Drawing Submittal details). 1.06 PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS (See Section 01700, Project Acceptance, for project record document details). END OF SECTION 01300 Submittals_3/21/19 01300 - 1 01300-A. SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM SUBMITTAL TRANSMITTAL Submittal Description: Submittal No.: Spec. -
Periodical Cicadas SP 341 3/21 21-0190 Programs in Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4-H Youth Development, Family and Consumer Sciences, and Resource Development
SP 341 Periodical Cicadas Frank A. Hale, Professor Originally developed by Harry Williams, former Professor Emeritus and Jaime Yanes Jr., former Assistant Professor Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology The periodical cicada, Magicicada species, has the broods have been described by scientists and are longest developmental period of any insect in North designated by Roman numerals. There are three 13-year America. There is probably no insect that attracts as cicada broods (XIX, XXII and XXIII) and 12 17-year much attention in eastern North America as does the cicada broods (I-X, XIII, and XIV). Also, there are three periodical cicada. Their sudden springtime emergence, distinct species of 17-year cicadas (M. septendecim, filling the air with their high-pitched, shrill-sounding M. cassini, and M. septendecula) and three species of songs, excites much curiosity. 13-year cicadas (M. tredecim, M. tredecassini, and M. tredecula). Two races of the periodical cicada exist. One race has a life cycle of 13 years and is common in the southeastern In Tennessee, Brood XIX of the 13-year cicada had a United States. The other race has a life cycle of 17 years spectacular emergence in 2011 (Map 1). In 2004 and and is generally more northern in distribution. Due 2021, Brood X of the 17-year cicada primarily emerged to Tennessee’s location, both the 13-year and 17-year in East Tennessee (Map 2). Brood X has the largest cicadas occur in the state. emergence of individuals for the 17-year cicada in the United States. Brood XXIII of the 13-year cicada last Although periodical cicadas have a 13- or 17-year cycle, emerged in West Tennessee in 2015 (Map 3). -
Grasshoppered: America's Response to the 1874
Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: Grasshoppered: America’s Response to the 1874 Rocky Mountain Locust Invasion Full Citation: Alexandra M Wagner, “Grasshoppered: America’s Response to the 1874 Rocky Mountain Locust Invasion,” Nebraska History 89 (2008): 154-167 URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/NH2008Grasshoppered.pdf Date: 2/11/2014 Article Summary: It was a plague of biblical proportions, influencing generations of federal agricultural policy . and foreshadowing today’s expectations about the government’s role during natural disasters. Cataloging Information: Names: Swain Finch, Solomon Butcher, H Westermann, Robert W Furnas, Thomas A Osborn, E O C Ord, N A M Dudley, Jeffrey Lockwood, John S Pillsbury, John L Pennington Keywords: Swain Finch, H Westermann, Robert W Furnas, Thomas A Osborn, Rocky Mountain locust (Melanoplus spretus), Nebraska Relief and Aid Association,