Mechanical Reaper (Edited from Wikipedia)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mechanical Reaper (Edited from Wikipedia) Mechanical Reaper (Edited from Wikipedia) SUMMARY A reaper is a farm implement or person that reaps (cuts and often also gathers) crops at harvest, when they are ripe. Usually the crop involved is a cereal grass. All mechanical reapers cut the grass; most also gather it. Modern machines that not only cut and gather the grass but also thresh its seeds (the grain), winnow the grain, and deliver it to a truck or wagon it are called combine harvesters or simply combines; they are the engineering descendants of earlier reapers. Hay is harvested somewhat differently from grain; in modern haymaking, the machine that cuts the grass is called a hay mower or, if integrated with a conditioner, a mower- conditioner. As a manual task, cutting of both grain and hay may be called reaping, involving scythes, sickles, and cradles, followed by differing downstream steps. Traditionally all such cutting could be called reaping, although a distinction between reaping of grain grasses and mowing of hay grasses has long existed; it was only after a decade of attempts at combined grain reaper/hay mower machines (1830s to 1840s) that designers of mechanical implements began resigning them to separate classes. Mechanical reapers substantially changed agriculture from their appearance in the 1830s until the 1860s through 1880s, when they evolved into related machines, often called by different names (self-raking reaper, harvester, reaper-binder, grain binder, binder), that collected and bound the sheaves of grain with wire or twine. Today reapers and grain binders have been largely replaced by combines in commercial farming, but some smaller farms still use them. HISTORY The 19th century saw several inventors in the United States claim innovation in mechanical reapers.The various designs competed with each other, and were the subject of several lawsuits. Obed Hussey in Ohio patented a reaper in 1833, the Hussey Reaper. Made in Baltimore, Maryland, Hussey's design was a major improvement in reaping efficiency. The new reaper only required two horses working in a non-strenuous manner, a man to work 1 the machine, and another person to drive. In addition, the Hussey Reaper left an even and clean surface after its use. The McCormick Reaper was designed by Robert McCormick in Walnut Grove, Virginia. However, Robert became frustrated when he was unable to perfect his new device. His son Cyrus asked for permission to try to complete his father's project. With permission granted, the McCormick Reaper was patented by his son Cyrus McCormick in 1837 as a horse-drawn farm implement to cut small grain crops. This McCormick reaper machine had several special elements: • a main wheel frame • projected to the side a platform containing a cutter bar having fingers through which reciprocated a knife driven by a crank • upon the outer end of the platform was a divider projecting ahead of the platform to separate the grain to be cut from that to be left standing • a reel was positioned above the platform to hold the grain against the reciprocating knife to throw it back upon the platform • the machine was drawn by a team walking at the side of the grain. Cyrus McCormick claimed that his reaper was actually invented in 1834, giving him the true claim to the general design of the machine. Over the next few decades the Hussey and McCormick reapers would compete with each other in the marketplace, despite being quite similar. In 1861, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a ruling on the invention of the polarizing reaper design. It was determined that the money made from reapers was in large part due to Obed Hussey. The commissioner of patents declared that Hussey's improvements were the foundation of their success. It was ruled that the heirs of Obed Hussey would be monetarily compensated for his hard work and innovation by those who had made money from the reaper. It was also ruled that McCormick's reaper patent would be renewed for another 7 years. Although the McCormick reaper was a revolutionary innovation for the harvesting of crops, it did not experience mainstream success and acceptance until at least 20 years after it was patented by Cyrus McCormick. This was because the McCormick reaper lacked a quality unique to Obed Hussey's reaper. Hussey's reaper used a sawlike cutter bar that cut stalks far more effectively than McCormick's. Only once Cyrus McCormick was able to acquire the rights to Hussey's cutter-bar mechanism (around 1850) did a truly revolutionary machine emerge. 2 Other factors in the gradual uptake of mechanized reaping included natural cultural conservatism among farmers (proven tradition versus new and unknown machinery); the poor state of many new farm fields, which were often littered with rocks, stumps, and areas of uneven soil, making the lifespan and operability of a reaping machine questionable; and some amount of fearful Luddism among farmers that the machine would take away jobs, most especially among hired manual laborers. Another strong competitor in the industry was the Manny Reaper by John Henry Manny and the companies that succeeded him. Even though McCormick has sometimes been simplistically credited as the [sole] "inventor" of the mechanical reaper, a more accurate statement is that he independently reinvented aspects of it, created a crucial original integration of enough aspects to make a successful whole, and benefited from the influence of more than two decades of work by his father, as well as the aid of Jo Anderson, a slave held by his family. CYRUS MCCORMICK Cyrus McCormick was born on February 15, 1809 in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia. He was the eldest of eight children born to inventor Robert McCormick, Jr. (1780– 1846) and Mary Ann "Polly" Hall (1780–1853). As Cyrus' father saw the potential of the design for a mechanical reaper, he applied for a patent to claim it as his own invention. He worked for 28 years on a horse-drawn mechanical reaper to harvest grain; however, he was never able to reproduce a reliable version. Cyrus took up the project. He was aided by Jo Anderson, an enslaved African American on the McCormick plantation at the time. Cyrus McCormick held one of his first demonstrations of mechanical reaping at the nearby village of Steeles Tavern, Virginia in 1831. He claimed to have developed a final version of the reaper in 18 months. The young McCormick was granted a patent on the reaper on June 21, 1834, two years after having been granted a patent for a self- sharpening plow. However, none were sold, because the machine could not handle varying conditions. The McCormick family also worked together in a blacksmith/metal smelting business. The panic of 1837 almost caused the family to go into bankruptcy when a partner pulled out. In 1839 McCormick started doing more public demonstrations of the reaper, but local farmers still thought the machine was unreliable. He did sell one in 1840, but none for 1841. 3 Using the endorsement of his father's first customer for a machine built by McPhetrich, Cyrus continuously attempted to improve the design. He finally sold seven reapers in 1842, 29 in 1843, and 50 in 1844. They were all built manually in the family farm shop. He received a second patent for reaper improvements on January 31, 1845. Moving Out West As word spread about the reaper, McCormick noticed orders arriving from farther west, where farms tended to be larger and the land flatter. While he was in Washington, DC to get his 1845 patent, he heard about a factory in Brockport, New York, where he contracted to have the machines mass-produced. He also licensed several others across the country to build the reaper, but their quality often proved poor, which hurt the product's reputation. In 1847, after their father's death, Cyrus and his brother Leander (1819–1900) moved to Chicago, where they established a factory to build their machines. At the time, other cities in the midwestern United States, such as Cleveland, Ohio, St. Louis, Missouri, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, were more established and prosperous. Chicago had no paved streets at the time, but the city had the best water transportation from the east over the Great Lakes for his raw materials, as well as railroad connections to the farther west where his customers would be. When McCormick tried to renew his patent in 1848, the US Patent Office noted that a similar machine had already been patented by Obed Hussey a few months earlier. McCormick claimed he had really invented his machine in 1831, but the renewal was denied. William Manning of Plainfield, New Jersey had also received a patent for his reaper in May 1831, but at the time, Manning was evidently not defending his patent. McCormick's brother William (1815–1865) moved to Chicago in 1849, and joined the company to take care of financial affairs. The McCormick reaper sold well, partially as a result of savvy and innovative business practices. Their products came onto the market just as the development of railroads offered wide distribution to distant markets. McCormick developed marketing and sales techniques, developing a wide network of salesmen trained to demonstrate operation of the machines in the field, as well as to get parts quickly and repair machines in the field if necessary during crucial times in the farm year. In 1851, McCormick traveled to London to display a reaper at the Crystal Palace Exhibition. After his machine successfully harvested a field of green wheat while the Hussey machine failed, he won a gold medal and was admitted to the Legion of Honor.
Recommended publications
  • Improved Innovative Siddhant Windrower Automated Reaper (IISWAR) B.S Dangi 1, S
    12603 B.S Dangi et al./ Elixir Mech. Engg. 54 (2013) 12603-12605 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Mechanical Engineering Elixir Mech. Engg. 54 (2013) 12603-12605 Improved Innovative Siddhant Windrower Automated Reaper (IISWAR) B.S Dangi 1, S. Sen Sharma 2, RK Bharilya 2 and A.K. Prasad 2 1Windrower Reaper, NIF, (National Innovation Foundation), Ahmedabad, India. 2Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Durgapur 713 209, (CSIR, Govt. of India) ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The paper reflects, machine designed and developed by authors that suit medium sized Received: 26 November 2012; farmer and farm industrialist holding only few acres of land. It has been designed and Received in revised form: developed by CMERI, Durgapur, India, in collaboration with NIF(National Innovation 15 January 2013; Foundation, Ahmedabad, India). A number of crops i.e., wheat, and pulse like soybean, Accepted: 18 January 2013; gram have been successfully reaped(harvested), and, concurrently the m/c is ready to undergo reliability&feasibility trial/inspection/check, desired for an Agri Machinery. It will Keywords be indigenously get checked for Nation wide R&D standard. The system is designed by Chaff, inculcating years of expertise in this stream. There is a keen observation by designer to Ear Heads, simplify assembling/disassembly and maintenance/ operations/ of picker reel, cutter link & Straw, blade, roll & push type auger and simplest possible bevel PTO. This prototype is a foolproof Maneuverability, machine, designed with consideration of global knowhow of scientific mechanisms of this Ergonomics. stream. The basic research work has been done thoroughly by selecting adequate technology and scientific calculations in all the assemblies and critical parts e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Producing a Past: Cyrus Mccormick's Reaper from Heritage to History
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2014 Producing a Past: Cyrus Mccormick's Reaper from Heritage to History Daniel Peter Ott Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ott, Daniel Peter, "Producing a Past: Cyrus Mccormick's Reaper from Heritage to History" (2014). Dissertations. 1486. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/1486 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2014 Daniel Peter Ott LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO PRODUCING A PAST: CYRUS MCCORMICK’S REAPER FROM HERITAGE TO HISTORY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY JOINT PROGRAM IN AMERICAN HISTORY / PUBLIC HISTORY BY DANIEL PETER OTT CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2015 Copyright by Daniel Ott, 2015 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is the result of four years of work as a graduate student at Loyola University Chicago, but is the scholarly culmination of my love of history which began more than a decade before I moved to Chicago. At no point was I ever alone on this journey, always inspired and supported by a large cast of teachers, professors, colleagues, co-workers, friends and family. I am indebted to them all for making this dissertation possible, and for supporting my personal and scholarly growth.
    [Show full text]
  • George W. Perkins and the International Harvester Steel Properties
    "... a dishonestman isat leastprudent." GeorgeW. Perkinsand theInternational Harvester Steel Properties Fred V. Carstensen University of Virginia On the afternoon of 13 February, 1902, Judge Elbert H. Gary had a "long talk" with Cyrus H. McCormick, Jr., president of the leading harvester manufacturer, the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company. Gary was worried. McCormick's principal competitor, the Deering Haverster Company, was installing a small rolling mill at their Chicago factory; the Deerings had also purchased the large Hawkins mine in the Mesabi range, and bought controlling interest in South Chicago Furnace Company, located just south of Chicago, where new steel furnaces were under construction. If completed, such vertical integration would not only deprive Judge Gary's US Steel of an important consumer of steel, but its example and com- petitive implications would surely impel McCormick and others in the same direction, threatening US Steel's market. Gary, speaking explicitly for the recently organized steel company, told McCormick that he wanted to see if it were "possible to prevent the further prosecution of" the Deering efforts. A solution to this "difficul- ty" had come to Gary "immediately" -- "the idea of a combination." Not only would combination "be a good thing" for the reaper manu- facturers, he believed he "could prove...that it would be to their interests not to go into the steel business" as the Deerings were now doing [12]. This conversation initiated the chain of events which led to creation of International Harvester just six months later, in August 1902. The successful negotiations between the McCormicks, Deerings, and owners of two smaller companies, Warder, Bushnell & Glessner and the Plano Company, were completed in six weeks of intensive work in New York in late June and July, negotiations handled by GeorgeW.
    [Show full text]
  • ROSE Is the Best!
    HOME-SCALE GRAIN PRODUCTION John Wallace Mark Dempsey Carolina Farm Stewardship Association Organic Growers School Spring Conference – March 2020 INTRODUCTION Grain Crops Cereals Legumes Pseudo-cereals Oilseed crops Why grow on small scale? Can grow staple foods Family-scale Retail high-end grains Reduce animal feed costs Match what you grow with what you eat SCALE & EFFICIENCY Will never be efficient as: Big grain growers (lbs/hr) Vegetables ($/acre) But can: Diversify your operation Help meet nutritional needs Help rethink food system Reduce feed costs Improve soil nutrient management THE CROPS Cereals Legumes Pseudo-cereals Oilseed crops CEREALS Corn Sorghum Small Grains Wheat Rye Barley Oats “Ancient” wheats Rice CEREALS Highest yields Tolerate wider soil water range Warm vs. cool season Affects crop rotation Affects yields: Summer (corn+sorghum) > winter (small grains) Fall-planted (“winter”) > spring-planted (“spring”) Differ in nutrient requirements Warm: Higher N / Lower K Cool: Lower N / Higher K CEREALS High N demand Corn: 130 lb/a (3 lb/1000 sq.ft) Sorghum: 100 lb/a (2.3 lb/1000 sq.ft) Small grains: 60 lb/a (1.4 lb/1000 sq.ft) Lots of calories, but low nutritional value: bu/a lbs/1000sq.ft % Protein % Fat % Carb Corn 160 205 10% 5% 82% Sorghum 90 115 12% 4% 82% Wheat, rye & barley 60-90 80-125 11-14% 2% 84-86% Oat 80 60 18% 7% 71% Yields are high, they have culinary value, high energy feed for animals LEGUMES Warm Season: Dry bean & other Phaseolus spp Soybean Cowpea, Adzuki & other Vigna spp Peanut Cool Season: Pea Lentil Chick- pea LEGUMES Lower yields than cereals Narrower moisture tolerance range More sensitive to wet than dry Warm vs.
    [Show full text]
  • When Did It Happen? What Do You Know?
    NAME _____________________________________________ DATE __________________ CLASS ____________ North and South Lesson 1 The Industrial North ESSENTIAL QUESTION Terms to Know clipper ship ship with sleek hulls and tall sails that How does technology change the way “clipped” time from long journeys people live? Morse code a system of dots and dashes that represent the alphabet GUIDING QUESTIONS telegraph a device that used electric signals to 1. How did technology and industry change send messages during the 1800s? 2. What changes made agriculture more profitable in the 1830s? When did it happen? 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1807 Robert Fulton 1825 Erie 1834 McCormick introduces the Canal opens reaper is patented 1847 Elias steamboat Howe invents 1837 John Deere the sewing develops the steel- machine tipped plow 1840 First American 1844 Samuel steam-powered Morse sends the locomotive runs first telegraph message What do you know? In the first column, answer the questions based on what you know before you study. After this lesson, complete the last column. Now... Later... What was one change as a result of the Erie Canal? In which part of the country was there more industry? What was the telegraph? Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom use. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission 181 NAME _____________________________________________ DATE __________________ CLASS ____________ North and South Lesson 1 The Industrial North, Continued Technology and Industry The early 1800s saw many innovations in industry, or the Explaining production of goods. Innovations are improved ways of doing 1. List three changes in things. There were new machines and new ways to use them.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource Survey Form ER# 2018-1595-003 PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL and MUSEUM COMMISSION 03/07/2018 Bureau for Historic Preservation
    Key # 4024 Historic Resource Survey Form ER# 2018-1595-003 PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL AND MUSEUM COMMISSION 03/07/2018 Bureau for Historic Preservation International Harvester Company of America Building; McCormick Harvesting Machine Company of America Harry Guckert Company 810 W NORTH AVE ASSOCIATES LP / 1008 BRIANNA LN BETHEL PARK , PA 15102-3795 1 Allegheny Pittsburgh Pittsburgh West, PA 15233 810 West North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA ZIP uilding District Object Site Structure Private Public/County Public/State Public/Federal TAX PARCEL #/YEAR 0023-N-00130-0000-00 Function (Items 7-8; see Instructions, pages 4-6) Historic Function Subcategory Particular Type Industry/Processing/Extracting Industry/Processing/Extract - Manufacturing Facility Ag. Implements Current Function Subcategory Particular Type Work In Progress Domestic - Multiple Dwelling Commerce/Trade Commerce/Trade - Business Office Property Features (Items 15-17; see Instructions, pages 7-8) Setting Mixed use neighborhood Ancillary Features 0.3 PA Historic Resource Survey Form Key # 4024 ER# 2018-1595-003 Architectural/Property Information (Items 9-14; see Instructions, pages 6-7) ARCHITECTURAL CLASSIFICATION Late 19th and Early 20th Century EXTERIOR MATERIALS and STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Foundation Stone Walls Brick Roof Asphalt Other Structural System Masonry WIDTH 140 (feet) or (# bays) DEPTH 100 (feet) or (# rooms) STORIES/HEIGHT 3-4 Historical Information (Items 18-21; see Instructions, page 8) Year Construction Began 1902 Circa Year Completed 1902 Circa Date of Major Additions, Alterations Circa Circa Circa Basis for Dating Documentary Physical Explain Newspaper articles and ledger of building permit applications Cultural/Ethnic Affiliation(s) Associated Individual(s) Associated Event(s) Architect(s) Unknown Builder(s) R&S Sollitt & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Test Analysis of Straw Reaper Combine for Optimized Operating Condition to Improve the Performance
    Field test analysis of straw reaper combine for optimized operating condition to improve the performance ABSTRACT The profitability of ex-situ straw management largely depends on the quantity and quality of straw recovered from the field. The straw reaper-combine is one of the widely used ex-situ straw management technologies being used to retrieve the leftover residue in the field after grain combine operation. Besides considering the positive implication of this technology in recent times, the quality of operation, which accounts for maximizing the performance parameters of straw reaper-combine in a wheat crop. The relationship among these parameters was established using multiple linear regression techniques through the regression equation. The ANOVA test of this experiment also established the significant (P < 0.01) effect of forwarding speed and cutting height on all performance parameters. It was observed from the experiment that when the forward speed was increased while keeping the cutting height at a constant level the recovery percentage and specific energy consumption were decreased whereas, straw split percentage and actual field capacity were increased. Likewise, when cutting height was increased keeping the forward speed at a constant level the recovery and split percentage were reduced but, the actual field capacity and specific energy consumption were increased. In order to achieve maximum performance at optimum energy consumption, the straw reaper should be operated at a speed between 3-4 km/h with cutting height between 30-60 mm. Keywords: Straw recovery, Straw reaper, Specific energy consumption, Straw split, Cutting height INTRODUCTION The RWS (Rice-Wheat system) is one of the widely practiced cropping systems in India and covers about 12.3 Mha (Ladha et al., 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Works Robert Mccormlck
    The Lif e a n d Wo rks Rob e rt M c C ormlck I n c lu d i n g Hi s I n v e n t i o n o f t h e R e a p e r Hall M cormi ck R . c J ame s Hall Shi elds P RE F A C E We have long contempl ated w riting an d comp iling a histo ry of ou r r McC ormi ck G an dfather, Robert , an d thus putting on record all the known facts conce rning h is li fe , his wo rk , an d h is inventions , an d in ou r connection the rewith fu rn ish ing all the evi dence , long in posses c r sion , rel ating to h is i nvention of the M c ormick Reape , but h ave i t now postponed f rom time to time , until , by reason of the app lica “ tion th at has b een m ade fo r the en rollment of h is n ame in the Ha ll of ” F a me r , i t becomes necessa y to fu rnish such info rm ation ; therefo re , r we h ave ca efully taken u p the subject, and on the succeed ing pages Will be f ou n d all the facts we h ave at h an d conce rning Robert M e affid av i ts i n Co rmick , togethe r with cop ies of letters , an d statements ou r i i possess ion bea r ng on the quest on of h is va rious inventions , bu t p rinci p ally an d first of all relating to h is great an d inestim able i n v en ti on r of the Reape r , an d his ea rn ing thereby a right to an en du ing H F r .
    [Show full text]
  • Cum--Binder for Harvesting of Soybean and Rice
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(3): 1754-1762 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 7 Number 03 (2018) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.207 Performance Evaluation of Reaper--cum--Binder for Harvesting of Soybean and Rice Ashutosh Tripathi, B.P. Mishra, Mithlesh Kumar*, Yogesh Singh Thakur and Kipoo Kiran Singh Mahilang Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering SVCAET & RS, FAE, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Krishak Nagar, Raipur, 492012, Chhattisgarh, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT The mechanization of harvesting operation is essential to minimize the cost of harvesting, grain production cost, grain loss, turnaround time, weather risk, and to increase benefit by appropriate technology. In order to achieve the above goal, a manually controlled reaper - cum- binder machine was tested and evaluate. This self-propelled reaper was operated in low 1st gear at forward speed of 2.5 km/h. It has 1400 mm size of cutter bar and dropped bundling mechanism. The testing of the machine was carried out with rice and soybean K e yw or ds crop during Kharif season of 2012 at the research farm of Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur. This machine made crop bundles of rice weighing about 5.3. Reaper, Binder, Rice, Soybean, The fuel consumption of machine was varied with crop type. It was found 1.22 and 1.15 Harvesting loss lit/h with soybean and rice crop respectively. According the cost of operation of reaper - cum- binder machine also varied according to type of crop.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyrus Mccormick & Western Agriculture Thomas Alva Edison
    HANDOUT B Rise of Big Business Radio Interview Role-Play For those with Big Business Roles: With your group members, read the Directions: biographical sketch on your assigned figure who contributed to the rise of big business. Prepare to answer questions from the interviewer and audience members. For those with Interviewer Roles: With your group members, prepare a list of questions for the figures who contributed to the rise of big business. After asking your own questions, invite audience participants to contribute their own questions. For the audience: Prepare your own questions for the figures who contributed to the rise of big business. Suggested topics: The character of the business figure The contribution of the business figure to the rise of big business General economic and social questions from the time period Rise of Big Business Role-Play Nametags Cyrus McCormick & Western Agriculture Thomas Alva Edison & Technological Inventions The Gilded Age and Progressive Era Unit 1, Lesson 1: The Rise of Big Business © Bill of Rights Institute Handout B, page 2 James J. Hill & the Railroads Andrew Carnegie & the Steel Industry John D. Rockefeller & the Oil Industry Jay Gould & American Finance J.P. Morgan & American Finance Interviewer The Gilded Age and Progressive Era Unit 1, Lesson 1: The Rise of Big Business © Bill of Rights Institute Handout B, page 3 Cyrus McCormick & the mechanical reaper was in use around the Western Agriculture world…He and his competitors had converted the American prairies from open space to the “In the open spaces of the American Midwest, breadbasket that fed the United States and much old Northwest, and Great Plains lay a potential of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Croplink Reaper
    CROPLINK REAPER Contains 200 g/l (20.6% w/w) fluroxypyr as an emulsifiable concentrate FOR USE AS AN AGRICULTURAL HERBICIDE IN WINTER AND SPRING CEREALS, FORAGE AND GRAIN MAIZE AND GRASSLAND. Please see inside for DIRECTIONS FOR USE. FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY Croplink Reaper is a translocated herbicide for the control of broad-leaved weeds, especially cleavers; • Barley • Oats • Triticale • Forage & Grain maize • Rye • Wheat • Grassland - Safety Information Danger Flammable liquid and vapour. May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways. Causes skin irritation. May cause an allergic skin reaction. Causes serious eye irritation May cause respiratory irritation May cause drowsiness or dizziness. Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects Contaminated work clothing should not be allowed out of the workplace. date IF SWALLOWED: Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. If skin irritation or a rash occurs: Get medical advice/attention. If eye irritation persists get medical advice/attention. Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep cool. Dispose of contents/container to a licensed to hazardous waste disposal contractor or collection site except for triple rinsed empty containers which can be disposed of as non-hazardous waste. To avoid risks to human health and the environment, comply with the instructions for use. SPECIMEN PCS No: 05842 PROTECT FROM FROST2019 Croplink (Ireland) Ltd., Springhill, Carrigtwohill, Co. Cork Tel: 065 7077331 Fax: 065 7077334 5/24561-FF PRECAUTIONS In case of emergency contact the Poisons Information Center Tel: +353 1 8092566 or +353 1 8379964 Do not contaminate water with the product or its container (Do not clean application equipment near surface water/Avoid contamination via drains from farmyards and roads).
    [Show full text]
  • Who Will Help Me Harvest the Wheat: Combines and Careers in Ag Mechanics
    Who Will Help Me Harvest the Wheat? Combines and Careers in Ag Mechanics Grades: 6-12 Purpose Students will read about the development and operation of a combine harvester and learn about careers in agricultural mechanics. Students will build a model of a Archimedes’ screw, analyze design flaws and improve on the design. Keywords wheat, harvest, careers, technology, electronics, mechanics, engineering, inventions, machines, farm equipment, tools past and present Materials • Diagram of a combine, provided with this lesson • Archimedes’ Screw Lab Instruction Sheet • Reading page (Essay): “Combine Harvester: Innovating Modern Wheat Farming, Impacting the Way the World Thinks About Bread” • “Careers in Wheat Harvest Mechanics” worksheet Interest Approach or Motivator Ask students to list modern machines that combines more than one task. What modern machines are used for more than one task (smart phones, computers)? Imagine a time when there was a separate machine for each task. Ask students if they have ever invented anything or wished they could invent something to combine more than one task. Make a list of the proposed inventions on the board. Background From the early 1900s to the mid 1920s, the wheat fields of the middleWest and Great Plains were scenes of great movement. Only a few workers were needed to plant the wheat crop, using horse and plow, but large numbers of workers were needed for the harvest, because most of the work was done by hand or using hand tools. To do this work as many as 250,000 men were annually on the move from field to field, following the ripening crop.
    [Show full text]