IN the COURT of the DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , MADUKKARAI. Present: Mrs

IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , MADUKKARAI. Present: Mrs. P. Subbulakshmi.,B.A.,LL.M., Judicial Magistrate, FTC No.I @ ML, Coimbatore & District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai (FAC).

Monday, 2nd day of November 2020 CMP.No.765/2020

K. Jeevanantham (26), S/o. Kamalakannan … Petitioner

/vs/ State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police, D-3 Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No.1580/2020 … Respondent

ORDER:

1. This Petition has been filed by the petitioner through E-Mail.

2. The Petitioner has filed this petition stating that the petitioner was

arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 17/10/2020 U/s.

294(b), 387 & 506 (ii) of IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the

petitioner and other accused asked the defacto complainant to give

money and for that, the defacto complainant refused to give the same

and therefore, the petitioner and his friend threatened the defacto

complainant with knife and used unparlimentary words. But the

CMP No.765/2020 1/3 petitioner is no way connected to this case and therefore, the petition

may be allowed.

3. After receiving this petition, the court sought reply from concerned

Police Station by mail. But, the prosecution did not give any reply,

though sufficient opportunity is given.

4. From the above and on perusal of records, it comes to know that the

petitioner is in judicial custody for the period of 17 days and this is the

2nd bail petition filed by the petitioner. Further, though sufficient

opportunity is given, the prosecution failed to send any reply and it

shows that the prosecution has no serious objections to allow this

petition. Further, considering the COVID-19 period and circumstances

of this case, this court inclines to allow this petition with following

conditions :

1. The petitioner shall produce 2 sureties likes sum each to the value of

Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of the court within 10 days from the

date of resuming regular court working day after COVID-19

pandemic.

CMP No.765/2020 2/3 2. The sureties are directed to produce their ID Card.

3. The petitioner is directed to Co- operate the investigation and shall

not tamper the evidence.

4. The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police for the

period of 10 days after lifting the Lock down period.

Dictated to Steno-Typist and directly typed by her in court Computer and after taking print out and after Sd/- carrying out corrections wherever necessary and Judicial Magistrate, (FAC) nd pronounced by me on 2 day of November 2020. District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Madukkarai.

CMP No.765/2020 3/3 IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , MADUKKARAI. Present: Mrs. P. Subbulakshmi.,B.A.,LL.M., Judicial Magistrate, FTC No.I @ ML, Coimbatore & District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai (FAC).

Monday, 2nd day of November 2020 CMP.No.761/2020

Benjamin Paul Pelix (27), S/o. Amalraj … Petitioner

/vs/ State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police, D-3 Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No.1580/2020 … Respondent

ORDER:

1. This Petition has been filed by the petitioner through E-Mail.

2. The Petitioner has filed this petition stating that the petitioner was

arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 17/10/2020 U/s.

294(b), 387 & 506 (ii) of IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the

petitoner along with his friend demanded money from the defacto

complainant for having drink and for that the defacto complainant

refused to give the same and therefore, the petitioner and his friend

threatened the defacto complainant with knife. But the petitioner is no

CMP No.761/2020 1/3 way connected to this case and therefore, the petition may be allowed.

3. After receiving this petition, the court sought reply from concerned

Police Station by mail. But, the prosecution did not give any reply,

though sufficient opportunity is given.

4. From the above and on perusal of records, it comes to know that the

petitioner is in judicial custody for the period of 17 days and this is the

2nd bail petition filed by the petitioner. Further, though sufficient

opportunity is given, the prosecution failed to send any reply and it

shows that the prosecution has no serious objections to allow this

petition. Further, considering the COVID-19 period and circumstances

of this case, this court inclines to allow this petition with following

conditions :

1. The petitioner shall produce 2 sureties likes sum each to the value of

Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of the court within 10 days from the

date of resuming regular court working day after COVID-19

pandemic.

2. The sureties are directed to produce their ID Card.

CMP No.761/2020 2/3 3. The petitioner is directed to Co- operate the investigation and shall

not tamper the evidence.

4. The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police for the

period of 10 days after lifting the Lock down period.

CMP No.761/2020 3/3 IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , MADUKKARAI. Present: Mrs. P. Subbulakshmi.,B.A.,LL.M., Judicial Magistrate, FTC No.I @ ML, Coimbatore & District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai (FAC).

Monday, 2nd day of November 2020 CMP.No.762/2020

Nazeer, S/o. Nasar … Petitioner

/vs/ State, Rep. By The Sub-Inspector of Police, D-3 Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No.1494/2020 … Respondent

ORDER:

1. This Petition has been filed by the petitioner through E-Mail.

2. The Petitioner has filed this petition stating that the petitioner was

arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 26/09/2020 U/s. 392

of IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the accused/petitioner

snatched the chain weight about 1.5 sovereign. But the petitioner did

not involve in this case and he was falsely implicated by the police.

Because, in this case, on 26/09/2020, the police officials stopped the

vehicle of the accused as he did not wear the helmet and at that time,

CMP No.762/2020 1/3 the quarrel arose between the petitioner and the police officials and

therefore, the petitioner was falsely implicated by the police. Hence,

the petition may be allowed.

3. After receiving this petition, the court sought reply from concerned

Police Station by mail. But, the prosecution did not give any reply,

though sufficient opportunity is given.

4. From the above and on perusal of records, it comes to know that the

petitioner is in judicial custody for the period of 38 days. Further,

though sufficient opportunity is given, the prosecution failed to send

any reply and it shows that the prosecution has no serious objections to

allow this petition. Further, considering the COVID-19 period and

circumstances of this case, this court inclines to allow this petition with

following conditions :

1. The petitioner shall produce 2 sureties likes sum each to the value of

Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of the court within 10 days from the

date of resuming regular court working day after COVID-19

pandemic.

CMP No.762/2020 2/3 2. The sureties are directed to produce their ID Card.

3. The petitioner is directed to Co- operate the investigation and shall

not tamper the evidence.

4. The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police for the

period of 10 days after lifting the Lock down period.

CMP No.762/2020 3/3 IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , MADUKKARAI. Present: Mrs. P. Subbulakshmi.,B.A.,LL.M., Judicial Magistrate, FTC No.I @ ML, Coimbatore & District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai (FAC).

Monday, 2nd day of November 2020 CMP.No.760/2020

Ranjith (21), S/o. Nagaraj … Petitioner

/vs/ State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police, D-3 Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No.1580/2020 … Respondent

ORDER:

1. This Petition has been filed by the petitioner through E-Mail.

2. The Petitioner has filed this petition stating that the petitioner was

arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 17/10/2020 U/s.

294(b), 387 & 506 (ii) of IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the

petitioner intercepted the defacto complainant by showing knife and

threatened him with dire consequences. But the petitioer is no way

connected to this case and therefore, the petition may be allowed.

CMP No.760/2020 1/3 3. After receiving this petition, the court sought reply from concerned

Police Station by mail. But, the prosecution did not give any reply,

though sufficient opportunity is given.

4. From the above and on perusal of records, it comes to know that the

petitioner is in judicial custody for the period of 17 days. Further,

though sufficient opportunity is given, the prosecution failed to send

any reply and it shows that the prosecution has no serious objections to

allow this petition. Further, considering the COVID-19 period and

circumstances of this case, this court inclines to allow this petition with

following conditions :

1. The petitioner shall produce 2 sureties likes sum each to the value of

Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of the court within 10 days from the

date of resuming regular court working day after COVID-19

pandemic.

2. The sureties are directed to produce their ID Card.

3. The petitioner is directed to Co- operate the investigation and shall

not tamper the evidence.

CMP No.760/2020 2/3 4. The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police for the

period of 10 days after lifting the Lock down period.

CMP No.760/2020 3/3 IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, COIMBATORE

Present: Thiru.N.Tamilinian. B.E., M.L., Judicial Magistrate No.II (FAC), Coimbatore.

Tuesday, the 3rd day of November 2020

C.M.P.No.3575/2020 in Cr.No.1953/2020

1. Ganeshkumar S/o. Maranna Gowder 2. B. Prasad Raj S/o. Baskaran Petitioners/Accused

/ VERSUS/

The Inspector of Police, E-3 Saravanampatti PS, Cr.No.1953/2020 Respondent / Complainant

ORDER

The petitioners / Accused had filed this petition and the same has been received through e- mail on 29.10.2020 and reply also received from the respondent side. After considering both the petition and reply, this court passed the following order.

The petitioner charged U/s.380 IPC and remanded to judicial custody on 21.09.2020. The petitioner states that the case of the prosecution is, on 04.09.2020 early morning someone robbed defacto complainant bike and he has lodged the complaint. During the investigation these petitioners have been arrested and remanded to judicial custody. The petitioners are falsely implicated in this case and they are no way connected in this case. On the side of respondent replied that as against A1 nearly 25 cases are pending in Coimbatore district and as against A2, two cases are pending in Nilgiri District, Kethi PS and one case is pending before Saravanampatti PS. In this case, investigation is still pending. The 2nd petitioner belongs to other district. At this stage, if the accused are released on bail they may abscond from the case and tampering the witnesses and they will continue to commit the same kind of offence. Hence strongly opposed to grant bail.

Considering all the facts, gravity of the offence this court not inclined to grant bail. Accordingly this petition is dismissed.

(Sd.Tr.N.Tamilinian) Judicial Magistrate No.II (FAC), Coimbatore. IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, COIMBATORE

Present: Thiru.N.Tamilinian. B.E., M.L., Judicial Magistrate No.II (FAC), Coimbatore.

Tuesday, the 3rd day of November 2020

C.M.P.No.3572/2020 in Cr.No.2071/2020

M. Shanmugham S/o.Muthusamy Chettiar Petitioner/Accused

/ VERSUS/

The Inspector of Police, E-2 Peelamedu PS, Cr.No.2071/2020 Respondent / Complainant

ORDER

The petitioner / Accused had filed this bail petition U/s.437 of Cr.P.C. and the same was received through mail on 29.10.2020 and reply also received from the respondent side. After considering both the petition and reply this court passed the following order.

The petitioner/Accused charged U/s.75(1)(c) TNCP Act, 324, 506(2) IPC and remanded to Judicial custody on 23.10.2020 .The petitioner states that he is innocent. Both the petitioner and the defacto complainant are working in PSG Hospital Canteen for the past few years, due to a petty quarrel arose between them, the petitioner has been charged. The defacto complainant sustained some injuries and has been treated as an outpatient. The petitioner is the only breadwinner of his family. Hence prays to grant bail. On the side of respondent replied that in this case investigation is still pending, at this stage if the accused is released on bail he may abscond from the case, tampering the witnesses and continue to commit the same kind of offence.

Considering all the facts, nature of the offence, and circumstances of case this court inclined to grant bail. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the petitioner released on bail with the following conditions:

1. The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- along with two sureties each to the like sum amount. 2. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent P.S.daily at 10.00 A.M until further orders. 3. The petitioner directed not to alter or tamper the witnesses. 4. The petitioner directed to appear before this court on receiving the summons.

(sd.Tr.N.Tamilinian) Judicial Magistrate No.II (FAC), Coimbatore. IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, COIMBATORE Presence :A.PRABU ,M.L., PGD IPL., JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I Tuesday, 3rd day of November 2020 C.M.P. No. (urgent ) 3457 Of 2020 CR.NO.1677 OF 2020

Nandhakumar S/o.Tamilarasan Vs .. Petitioner/ Accused

Inspector of Police, Thudialur p.s, coimbatore Cr. No. 1677 of 2020 ... Respondent/ Complainant

ORDER

Bail Application Filed U/s. 437 OF Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner by Advocate Thiru Rajendran and this application has been received through E-mail. Police submitted reply on 03.11.2020. After considering bail application, FIR and submission of counsel through email this court passed the following order.

2. From the materials available submitted through email it is seen that Accused is charged for the offences under Sections 392 IPC and he was arrested by the respondent/police and he was remanded to judicial custody on 03.09.2020.

3. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner further submits that is innocent and they had been falsely implicated in this case. The conclusion of the proceedings may take reasonable long time and the petitioners have to languish in jail for no fault of his own. The continuous detention of the petitioner would adversely reflect on his physical and mental health. The petitioner is having permanent residence. The petitioner will neither nor tamper the witness if he enlarged on bail. The petitioner is only bread winner of his family. The petitioner is ready to produce sufficient sureties to the satisfaction of the learned judicial magistrate No.I of coimbatore and ready to abide any condition. The is no bail application pending before this Hon'ble Court and Hon'ble High court of Chennai. Thus he prayed for release on bail. 4. Notice was sent through email to police. In the reply submitted by police on 3rd November, police and prosecution has raised strong objection in releasing the accused on bail stating that the prosecution submitted that if the petitioner is released on bail he will tamper the witnesses and hamper the investigation, he may continue to the same kind of offence, Investigation is still pending, he is a habitual offenders, he has previous case in various police station in various district. Hence, the prosecution strongly oppose to allow this petition and may be dismissed.

5. Material submitted through email were perused. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, Nature of the offence, objection and stage of the investigation, this court does not incline to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, this petition is dismissed.

Dictated to Steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me through Email on this the 3rd day of November 2020.

-Sd-

A.PRABU JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I,COIMBATORE IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, COIMBATORE

Present: Thiru.N.Tamilinian. B.E., M.L., Judicial Magistrate No.II (FAC), Coimbatore.

Tuesday, the 3rd day of November 2020

C.M.P.No.3569/2020 in Cr.No.1928/2020

B. Prasad Raj S/o. Baskaran Petitioner/Accused

/ VERSUS/

The Inspector of Police, E-3 Saravanampatti PS, Cr.No.1928/2020 Respondent / Complainant

ORDER

The petitioner / Accused had filed this petition and the same has been received through e- mail on 29.10.2020 and reply also received from the respondent side. After considering both the petition and reply, this court passed the following order.

The petitioner charged U/s.457, 380 IPC and remanded to judicial custody on 21.09.2020. The petitioner states that the case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant lodged this complaint stating that on 04.09.2020 night someone robbed Rs.30 Lakhs, and 10 pouns (Chain-2 (3 poun), bangles 2 (4 poun), ear ring and ring from his house. During the investigation this petitioner arrested and remanded to judicial custody. The petitioner is innocent and he is falsely implicated in this case. On the side of respondent replied that as against the petitioner two cases are pending before the Nilgiris District, Kethi P.S. and nearly 25 cases are pending in various police stations in Coimbatore District and one case is pending before Saravanampatti PS. Investigation is still pending. The petitioner belongs to other district. At this stage, if the accused is released on bail he may abscond from the case and tampering the witnesses and he will continue to commit the same kind of offence. Hence strongly opposed to grant bail.

Considering all the facts, gravity of the offence this court not inclined to grant bail. Accordingly this petition is dismissed.

1)Balasubramani(26) S/o.Mayan 2)Shanmugam S/o.Ayyasamy Vs .. Petitioner/ Accused

Inspector of Police, RPF Coimbatore p.s, Cr. No. 4 of 2020 ... Respondent/ Complainant

ORDER

Bail Application Filed U/s. 437 OF Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner by Advocate Thiru Suresh and this application has been received through E-mail. Police submitted reply on 02.11.2020. After considering bail application, FIR and submission of counsel through email this court passed the following order.

2. From the materials available submitted through email it is seen that Accused is charged for the offences under Sections 3(a)RP(UP)ACT and he was arrested by the respondent/police and he was remanded to judicial custody on 05.10.2020.

3. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner further submit that they are innocent and being falsely implicated in the above crime by the respondent police. The petitioners further submits that they out rightly denies the allegations raised him in FIR. The petitioners submit that they are permanently residing at the above address and they will not abscond. The petitioners are a law abiding citizen hailing from a respectable family. The petitioners humbly submit that they are not having any other previous case and they have good antecedents. The petitioners if released on bail not abscond or tamper with any witnesses. The petitioners are only breadwinner of his family. The petitioners will abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Hon'ble Court. The petitioners are ready and willing to produce sufficient sureties to the satisfaction of this Hon'ble Court. The petitioners have not filed any similar bail application before the Hon'ble district court or High court of Judicature at Madras. Thus he prayed for release on bail.

4. Notice was sent through email to police. In the reply submitted by police on 3rd November, the investigation of this case has not completed and the same is under progress. In these circumstances, if the above accused persons are released on bail, they will tamper the evidence and influence the key witnesses which will adversly affect the successful investigation of the case. Hence, it is prayed that the application for bail submitted by the above accused persons may not be considered please.

5. Considering all the facts, nature of the offence and period of custody this court inclined to grant bail. Accordingly this petition is allowed subject to the following condition. The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.10000/- along with two sureties each to the like sum amount the petitioner shall appear before the respondent PS, daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

Dictated to Steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me through Email on this the 3rd day of November 2020.

-Sd-

A.PRABU JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I,COIMBATORE IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, COIMBATORE

Present: Thiru.N.Tamilinian. B.E., M.L., Judicial Magistrate No.II (FAC), Coimbatore.

Tuesday, the 3rd day of November 2020

C.M.P.No.3540/2020 in Cr.No.786/2020

Senthilkumar S/o. Nachimuthu Petitioner/Accused

/ VERSUS/

The Inspector of Police, M-3 Kovilpalayam PS, Cr.No.786/2020 Respondent / Complainant

ORDER

The petitioner/Accused had filed this petition and the same has been received through e- mail on 29.10.2020 and reply also received from the respondent side. After considering both the petition and reply, this court passed the following order.

The petitioner charged U/s.457, 380 IPC and remanded to judicial custody on 09.09.2020. The petitioner states that he is innocent and has not committed any offence. The defacto complainant was gave a complaint and states that he is having a house in D.No.101 and 102 in the name of OBG Steel Furniture and Electronics and on 07.9.2020 he was closed the shop, next day at morning 9.30 A.M. he went the shop and shows that one Leema LED 32” TV -1 No, Crompton Table fan-1 No. Computer table 1 No. were stolen and the value of the property is Rs.25000/-. The petitioner further states that the above said case is false and vexatious and he is falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner further states that as against the son of the petitioner a case is pending before respondent P.S. and that case one motor cycle belongs to the petitioner was seized and the RC book for the said vehicle also seized by the respondent. Return of property petition filed by the petitioner and the respondent refused to produce the RC Book for the said vehicle, in that vengence the respondent police falsely implicated in this case against this petitioner and the entire case property already recovered by the police. On the side of respondent replied that the petitioner is a habitual offender, as against the petitioner 11 cases are pending for the same kind of offence in various police stations and if the accused is released on bail he may abscond from the case and there is a chance for tampering the witnesses.

Considering all the facts, gravity of the offence this court not inclined to grant bail. Accordingly this petition is dismissed.

(Sd.Tr.N.Tamilinian) Judicial Magistrate No.II (FAC), Coimbatore. IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, COIMBATORE

Present: Thiru.N.Tamilinian. B.E., M.L., Judicial Magistrate No.II (FAC), Coimbatore.

Tuesday, the 3rd day of November 2020

C.M.P.No.3523/2020 in Cr.No.2030/2020

Velmani S/o. Palanisamy Petitioner/Accused

/ VERSUS/

The Inspector of Police, E-2 Peelamedu PS, Cr.No.2030/2020 Respondent / Complainant

ORDER

The petitioner / Accused had filed this bail petition U/s.437 of Cr.P.C. and the same was received through mail on 23.10.2020 and reply also received from the respondent side. After considering both the petition and reply this court passed the following order.

The petitioner/Accused charged U/s.384, 506(2) IPC and remanded to Judicial custody on 15.10.2020 .The petitioner states that he is innocent and has not committed any offence and states that the petitioner running a spa centre in Uppilipalayan and the defacto complainant also running spa centre near area, due to the business competition and vengeance to harass the petitioner and his family, false complaint has given against this petitioner, he is only the bread winner of his family. Hence prays to grant bail. On the side of respondent replied that in this case investigation is still pending, at this stage if the accused is released on bail he may abscond from the case and continue to commit the same kind of offence.

1. The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- along with two sureties each to the like sum amount.

2. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent P.S.daily at 10.00 A.M until further orders.

3. The petitioner directed not to alter or tamper the witnesses.

4. The petitioner directed to appear before this court on receiving the summons.

(Sd.Tr.N.Tamilinian) Judicial Magistrate No.II (FAC), Coimbatore. IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, COIMBATORE Presence :A.PRABU ,M.L., PGD IPL., JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I Tuesday, 3rd day of November 2020 C.M.P. No. (urgent) 3516 Of 2020 CR.NO.917 OF 2020 Pataram dewasi S/o.Talachha ram Petitioner / Defacto complainant Owner of the Property / VERSUS/ The Inspector of Police, R.S.Puram P.S Cr.No. 917/2020 Coimbatore . Respondent / Complainant

ORDER 1. This application was filed u/s 451 r/w 457 of crpc, on behalf of the petitioner by Advocate Palaniswamy and this application has been received through E-mail, seeking for interim custody of TVS XL Super heavy duty TN 66 A 0374 in P.R No.156/2020 which is seized by the respondent/police in above crime number. Police submitted reply on 03.11.2020. After considering this application, reply and submission of counsel through email, this court passed the following order.

2. The Petitioner/accused was involved in the above case. I further submit that I came to know that my vehicle has been seized by the respondent police and the accused also arrested by the respndent police. I further submits atht I need the above said vehicle for my dau to day business use. If under the custody of respndent police my vehicle will get damaged in calamities. Hence I need the vehicle for my day to day use of business and own use. Hence the connected petition for return of property. Unless the vehicle recovered in the above case return to me I will be put to much loss and hardship. I undertake to produce the said vehicle as and when this hon'ble court order to do so. I undertake I will not sell or modify or pledge the vehcle or alter the vehicle till the disposal of the above case. I further submit that it is just and nessary to returm the vehicle to me.

3. The respondent police submits that Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS-IV TN 66 W 4579 may be returned to the petitioner. 4. Material submitted through email, reply and case materials are carefully perused and considered. The petitioner appeared before this court and produced aadhar card, RC book, Insurance. On perusal of case records, the Petitioner is the owner of the TVS XL Super heavy duty TN 66 A 0374. Considering the nature of the offence and the nature of the case as well as objection raised by the prosecution, this court is inclined to grant interim custody of the TVS XL Super heavy duty TN 66 A 0374 to the petitioner.

In fine, this application is Allowed accordingly with the following conditions.

1. The petitioner shall execute a own bond for Rs. 40,000/. 2. The petitioner shall produce the RC book Xerox, photo copies of the property taken in different angels. 3. The photo copies of the property to be attested by both the petitioner. 4. The petitioner shall also produce the property at the time of trial as same conditions. 5. The petitioner shall not sell or alter in anyway encumber the property.

Dictated to Steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me through Email on this the 3rd day of November 2020.

-Sd-

Manoj(33) S/o.Pavul Jacob Vs .. Petitioner/ Accused

Inspector of Police, Thudialur p.s, coimbatore Cr. No. 1677 of 2020 ... Respondent/ Complainant

ORDER

Bail Application Filed U/s. 437 OF Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner by Advocate Thiru Ramesh and this application has been received through E-mail. Police submitted reply on 03.11.2020. After considering bail application, FIR and submission of counsel through email this court passed the following order.

3. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner is innocent and not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR, The Petitioner Accused is innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged.The Petitioner Accused is a Law abiting citizen and so he will not abscond. The Petitioner Accused is prepared to furnish substantial sureties to his / her due appearance. Thus he prayed for release on bail.

4. Notice was sent through email to police. In the reply submitted by police on 3rd November, police and prosecution has raised strong objection in releasing the accused on bail stating that the prosecution submitted that if the petitioner is released on bail he will tamper the witnesses and hamper the investigation, he may continue to the same kind of offence, Investigation is still pending, he is a habitual offenders, he has previous case in various police station in various district. Hence, the prosecution strongly oppose to allow this petition and may be dismissed.

Dictated to Steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me through Email on this the 3rd day of November 2020.

-Sd-

A.PRABU JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I,COIMBATORE IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, COIMBATORE Presence :A.PRABU ,M.L., PGD IPL., JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I Tuesday, 3rd day of November 2020 C.M.P. No. (urgent) 3508 Of 2020 CR.NO.332 OF 2019 Srinivasan S/o.Mahalingam Petitioner / Defacto complainant Owner of the Property / VERSUS/ The Inspector of Police, R.S.Puram P.S Cr.No. 332/2019 Coimbatore . Respondent / Complainant

ORDER

1. This application was filed u/s 451 r/w 457 of crpc, on behalf of the petitioner by Advocate Rajappan and this application has been received through E-mail, seeking for interim custody of 3 sovereign Gold neck Chain in P.R No.270/2020 which is seized by the respondent/police in above crime number. Police submitted reply on 03.11.2020. After considering this application, reply and submission of counsel through email, this court passed the following order.

2. The Petitioner/accused was involved in the above case. I am the petitioner herein. My wife name is s.Jayalakshmi, she died on 12.12.2019 at my residence on 20.04.2019 my wife lodged complaint before the respondent police because of her chain was snatched by the accused. The weight of the chain is 3 sovereign gold neck chain. The chain was recovered by the respondent police and now the chain is in custody of this Hon'ble Court. As a sole legal heir of my wife. I filed this petition for return of the gold chain. Therefore it is prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to return the chain and render justice.

3. The respondent police submits that 3 sovereign Gold neck Chain may be returned to the petitioner. 4. Material submitted through email, reply and case materials are carefully perused and considered. The petitioner appeared before this court and produced adhar card. On perusal of case records, the Petitioner is the owner of the 3 sovereign Gold neck Chain (As per the court weight Gold chain 23.540 gram). Considering the nature of the offence and the nature of the case as well as objection raised by the prosecution, this court is inclined to grant interim custody of the 3 sovereign Gold neck Chain (As per the court weight Gold chain 23.540 gram) to the petitioner.

In fine, this application is Allowed accordingly with the following conditions.

1. The petitioner shall execute a own bond for Rs. 1,40,000/. 2. The petitioner shall produce the photo copies of the property taken in different angels. 3. The photo copies of the property to be attested by both the petitioner. 4. The petitioner shall also produce the property at the time of trial as same conditions. 5. The petitioner shall not sell or alter in anyway encumber the property

Dictated to Steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me through Email on this the 3rd day of November 2020.

-Sd-

Manoj(33) S/o.Pavul Jacob Vs .. Petitioner/ Accused

Inspector of Police, Thudialur p.s, coimbatore Cr. No. 520 of 2019 ... Respondent/ Complainant

ORDER

2. From the materials available submitted through email it is seen that Accused is charged for the offences under Sections 457, 380 IPC and he was arrested by the respondent/police and he was remanded to judicial custody on 09.09.2020.

+¡, , 5 5 8 9 9 ¡5 9 9 8 %

offence, Inves, on s s end ng, e s a ab tu offenders, e as re ous case n

8 #5 ,¡, ,9 8 , +5 8 8 ¡55 #¢ ,9

var ous ce s on n var ous d str ct. Hence, e rosecu on stron y o ose to s

, , & 8 e on and may be d s ssed.

Dictated to Steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me through Email on this the 3rd day of November 2020.

-Sd-

Gopalakrishnan(37) S/o.Pattan Vs .. Petitioner/ Accused

Inspector of Police, RPF Palakkad p.s, Coimbatore Cr. No. 1 of 2020 ... Respondent/ Complainant

ORDER Bail Application Filed U/s. 437 OF Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner by Advocate Thiru Suresh and this application has been received through E-mail. Police submitted reply on 02.11.2020. After considering bail application, FIR and submission of counsel through email this court passed the following order.

3. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner further submit that he is innocent and not having any other previous case and he has good antecedents and being falsely implicated in the above crime by the respondent police. The petitioner is a daily wages cooley worker. The petitioner is the only person to take care and breadwinner of his family, his family members defends on his earnings. The petitioenr is hails from very respectable family. There is nobody to look after his family. The petitioner is ready to obey any condition imposed by this Hon'ble court unless he enlarged on bail, his family will spoil and the petitioner will be put serious loss and hardship and untold misery. The petitioner has not filed any similar bail application before the Hon'ble District court or high court of judicature at Madras. Thus he prayed for release on bail. 4. Notice was sent through email to police. In the reply submitted by police on 15th October, the enquiry of this case is still under progress, at this stage, if the accused person is released on bail, there is a chance of tampering the evidence/excape in other place and which may cause delaying of legal proceeding in this case. Hence, I strongly object to release the accused person on bail please.

Dictated to Steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me through Email on this the 3rd day of November 2020.

-Sd-

A.PRABU JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I,COIMBATORE IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, COIMBATORE Presence :A.PRABU ,M.L., PGD IPL., JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I Tuesday, 3rd day of November 2020 C.M.P. No. (urgent)N3428NOfN2020 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNCR.NO.1111 OF 2020 Sanjaykumar S/o.Ragu Petitioner / Defacto complainant Owner of the Property / VERSUS/ The Inspector of Police, R.S.Puram P.S Cr.No. 1111/2020 Coimbatore . Respondent / Complainant

ORDER 1. This application was filed u/s 451 r/w 457 of crpc, on behalf of the petitioner by Advocate Anbarasan and this application has been received through E-mail, seeking for interim custody of Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS-IV TN 66 W 4579 in P.R No.229/2020 which is seized by the respondent/police in above crime number. Police submitted reply on 23.10.2020. After considering this application, reply and submission of counsel through email, this court passed the following order.

2. The Petitioner/accused was involved in the above case. I humbly submit that the respondent/complainant produced Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS-IV TN 66 W 4579(white colour), Two wheeler and it costs of Rs.1,00,000/- to this honourable court on 09.10.2020. In the above case the investigation is over and the complainant filed the charge sheet. The statement of the accused and witnesses clearly shows that Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS-IV TN 66 W 4579 two wheeler and costs of Rs.1,00,000/- belongs to the petitioner. The petitioner apprehends that the trial may require a reasonably long time to conclude. The petitioner being a daily go to work requires the thinks for his business. Due to the seizure of the thinks. I humbly respectfully submit that the no prejudice will be caused to anybody in returning the thinks to the petitioner. The petitioner will undertake to execute bond t produce it whenever required by this Hon'ble court. 3. The respondent police submits that Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS-IV TN 66 W 4579 may be returned to the petitioner.

4. Material submitted through email, reply and case materials are carefully perused and considered. The petitioner appeared before this court and produced aadhar card, RC book, Insurance. On perusal of case records, the Petitioner is the owner of the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS-IV TN 66 W 4579. Considering the nature of the offence and the nature of the case as well as objection raised by the prosecution, this court is inclined to grant interim custody of the Bajaj Pulsar NS 200 BS-IV TN 66 W 4579 to the petitioner.

In fine, this application is Allowed accordingly with the following conditions.

1. The petitioner shall execute a own bond for Rs. 1,00,000/. 2. The petitioner shall produce the RC book Xerox, photo copies of the property taken in different angels. 3. The photo copies of the property to be attested by both the petitioner. 4. The petitioner shall also produce the property at the time of trial as same conditions. 5. The petitioner shall not sell or alter in anyway encumber the property.

Dictated to Steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me through Email on this the 3rd day of November 2020.

-Sd-

Nandhakumar S/o.Tamilarasan Vs .. Petitioner/ Accused

Inspector of Police, Thudialur p.s, coimbatore Cr. No. 1677 of 2020 ... Respondent/ Complainant

ORDER

Dictated to Steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me through Email on this the 3rd day of November 2020.

-Sd-

A.PRABU JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I,COIMBATORE IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VII, COIMBATORE. Present: Thiru.G.Manikandaraja. B.A., B.L., Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore. CRLMP No. 3400/2020 in Cr.No. 30/2020 Tuesday, the 03ed of November 2020

Balraj, S/o Muniyappan, No. 34, Nehru Street, Posaripalayam, Lawley, Road Post, Coimbatore. ... Petitioner/ Accused /Vs/ State Rep by Inspector of Police., City Crime Branch police Station Cr.No. 30/2020 ... Respondent/Complainant

CMP No.771 /2020

K.Venkatesh (56) S/O Kandasamy .. Petitioner /defecto complainant Intervening Petitioner /Vs/ 1. Balraj (57) S/O Muniappan 2. State Rep by Inspector of Police., CCB police Station, Cr.No. 30 /2020 .. Respondents.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Learned Advocate Mr.K.Shanmuganathan,B.A.,B.L., Advocate for the Intervening petitioner /Defacto Complainant and Learned Advocate Mr.S.R.Rajeshkumar,B.A.,B.L., Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Assistant Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court delivers the following :

ORDER

The Bail application is filed u/s 437 of Cr.P.C to enlarge the accused on bail.

2. Common order is pronounced in CRLMP NO: 3400/2020 which is bail application and in CMP No: 771/2020 which is intervening application. 3. Records are perused. Heard both sides. Petitioner/1st Accused is charged for an offence punishable u/s 120-B,467,468 of IPC and he is in Judicial Custody from 30.09.2020 for past 35 days. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner/1st accused contended that there is title dispute over the subject matter of the properties and petitioner is only power of attorney and after knowing dispute over the properties, petitioner/1st accused cancelled the power of attorney and sale agreement and he has no role in subsequent events and in subsequent documents. 5. Learned counsel for intervenor contended that if the petitioner/1st accused is enlarged on bail, he will tamper the witnesses and he will change the revenue records. Learned counsel for intervenor contended that there is no change of circumstances in this bail application and 1st accused can not escape from criminal liability merely on the ground that he cancelled the power of attorney. 6. On perusal of records would reveal that 1st accused obtained power of attorney and executed sale agreement and he cancelled the same after the defacto complainant filed writ-petition before Hon'ble High Court. Other accused executed sale agreement on 20.02.2020 in respect of the disputed property by changing survey number. Petitioner/1st accused has no role in the transaction dated 20.02.2020 and overtact f 1st accused concern is with power of attorney deed and sale agreement and the same were cancelled. 7. It is the case of prosecution that Accused 2 to 7 have executed sale agreement without having title and the subject matter of the property belongs to defacto complainant. 1St Accused is having role in earlier transaction and the same was cancelled by him and his criminal liability would be decided in the rial. 8. Petitioner/1st accused is in Judicial custody for past 35 days and the same is considered. As stated in the earlier order, there is dispute over the properties to identify the same. Though the other accused are having title over the extent of the property, survey number of the property is in dispute. This 1st accused concern over tact is pertaining cancelled documents. 9. On considering facts and circumstance of the case and Judicial custody of accused for past 35 days, petitioner/1st accused is enlarged on bail subject to following conditions. (i) Petitioner/1st Accused shall execute bond for Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties. (ii) Petitioners/1st Accused shall not tamper the witnesses and shall not create any documents pertaining to subject matter of properties without redress remedu before the appropriate court. (iii) Petitioners/1st Accused shall sign before police station, concern at 10.00 am daily for 30 days.

Intervening petition in CMP No: 771/2020 is closed.

Order was written by me and the same was typed by typist and pronounced via email.

(Sd/G.Manikandaraja.,B.A.,B.L.,) Judicial Magistrate No. VII, Coimbatore. IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru. R.SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3001/2020 (In C.A.184/2020) ****

C.A.No.184/2020 C.C.273/2017 (The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level - I, Coimbatore.)

Offences: u/s.138 of NI Act.

(SI for a period of six months, and to pay a compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- to the complainant within two month from the date of judgment, in default to undergo SI for a period of two months.)

D.Chandrika Premakumari (59 years) W/o. Govindharaj … Petitioner / Appellant

/vs/

1. The State represented by Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore.

2. A.L.Antony S/o. Lonappan … Respondents / Complainant

This petition is filed by the petitioner / appellant, u/s.389(1) of Cr.P.C. praying to suspend the sentence till the disposal of appeal. This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. Selvaraju, Advocate for the petitioner / Appellant, and Thiru M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition and having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard both side.

The petitioner seeks suspension of sentence pending disposal of appeal.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that the petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to undergo SI for a period of six months and to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation to the complainant within two month from the date of judgment, in default the petitioner shall undergo SI for a period of two months, for the offence u/s.138 of NI Act, imposed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-I, Coimbatore, in C.C.No.273/2017, dated 01-10-2020. The learned counsel further submitted that the conviction and sentence awarded by the lower Court is not sustainable and this petitioner is having the valid defence and prayed to suspend the sentence. The learned counsel prayed to give reasonable time to deposit 20% of the compensation amount.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has not raised any serious objection to allow this petition.

4. The petitioner has not paid compensation amount of Rs.5,00,000/- imposed upon him.

5. This Court has considered the submissions made by either side. Negotiable Instruments Act, has been amended vide Act 20/2018 w.e.f. 01-09- 2018 and thereby a new section 148 has been inserted in the parent Act. As per the said amendment, the Appellate Court may order the appellant to deposit such sum which shall be a minimum of twenty percent of the fine or compensation awarded by the trial Court. Recently the Hon’ble Apex Court interpreted the Sec.148 of the Negotiable Instrument Act in Surinder Singh Deswal @ Col.S.S.Deswal Vs Virender Gandhi [Criminal Appeal Nos.917-944 of 2019, dated 29-05-2019] that the Appellate Court shall direct the Appellant / Accused to deposit the sum which shall not be less than 20% of the fine or compensation, either on an application filed by the original complainant or even on the application filed by the Appellant / Accused under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C. to suspend the sentence.

6. After considering all the above said aspects and following the dictum laid down by the Apex Court, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to allow this petition and the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on the petitioner by the lower Court alone is hereby suspended till disposal of the appeal subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on her executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-I, Coimbatore, on or before 23-12-2020.

(ii) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards the part of compensation amount before the lower Court on or before 23-12-2020.

(iii) Final Order in respect of the deposit amount will be passed by the Appellate Court at the time of disposal of the appeal.

(iv) The petitioner shall report before the trial Court on the 1st working day of every English calendar month at 10.30 a.m. without fail, until further orders.

The appeal is made over to the IVth Additional District & Sessions Court, Coimbatore. The appeal stands posted to 16-12-2020.

On the failure of the petitioner, to comply with any of the above said conditions, the suspension granted to him shall stand cancelled automatically and the Magistrate concerned shall take necessary steps to secure the petitioner / accused.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The IVth Additional District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. 2. The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level - I, Coimbatore. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 4. The Petitioner /appellant through his counsel.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru. R.SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3000/2020 (In C.A.185/2020) ****

C.A.No.185/2020 C.C.683/2017 (The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level - II, Coimbatore.)

Offences: u/s.138 of NI Act.

(SI for a period of six months, and to pay a compensation of Rs.11,00,000/- to the complainant along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum, within one month from the date of judgment, in default to undergo SI for a period of three months.)

A.Karthikeyan (42 years) S/o. N.Anandhan … Petitioner / Appellant /vs/

1. S.Natarajan (65 years) S/o. S.Subramaniam

2. The State represented by Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Respondents / Complainant

This petition is filed by the petitioner / appellant u/s.389(1) of Cr.P.C. praying to suspend the sentence till the disposal of appeal. This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. S.Nimalraj, Advocates for the petitioner / Appellant, and Thiru M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition and having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard both side.

The petitioner seeks suspension of sentence pending disposal of appeal.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that the petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to undergo SI for a period of six months and to pay a sum of Rs.11,00,000/- as compensation to the complainant within one month from the date of judgment, in default the petitioner shall undergo SI for a period of three months, for the offence u/s.138 of NI Act, imposed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-II, Coimbatore, in C.C.No.683/2017, dated 07-10-2020. The learned counsel further submitted that the conviction and sentence awarded by the lower Court is not sustainable and this petitioner is having the valid defence and prayed to suspend the sentence. The learned counsel prayed to give reasonable time to deposit 20% of the compensation amount.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has not raised any serious objection to allow this petition.

4. The petitioner has not paid compensation amount of Rs.11,00,000/- imposed upon him.

(ii) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.2,20,000/- towards the part of compensation amount before the lower Court on or before 23-12-2020.

(iii) Final Order in respect of the deposit amount will be passed by the Appellate Court at the time of disposal of the appeal.

(iv) The petitioner shall report before the trial Court on the 1st working day of every English calendar month at 10.30 a.m. without fail, until further orders.

The appeal is made over to the Vth Additional District & Sessions Court, Coimbatore. The appeal stands posted to 16-12-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Vth Additional District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. 2. The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level - II, Coimbatore. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 4. The Petitioner /appellant through his counsel. IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru. R.SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2998/2020 (In C.A.186/2020) C.A.No.186/2020 C.C.259/2018

(The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level - II, Coimbatore.)

Offences: u/s.138 of NI Act.

(SI for a period of six months, and to pay a total compensation of Rs.7,35,544/- to the complainant along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum, in default to undergo SI for a period of three months.)

1. M/s. Senthil Distributors Represented by its Proprietor Senthilkumar

2. Senthilkumar (Aged 40 years) Proprietor of M/s.Senthil Distributors … Petitioners / Appellants

/vs/

1. M/s. Almonard Private Limited, Represented by its Regional Manager, P.K.Hariharan (Aged 63 years)

2. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Respondents / Complainant

This petition is filed by the petitioners / appellants, u/s. 389(2) of Cr.P.C., praying to suspend the sentence till the disposal of appeal. This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tmt. / Selvi. A.Vigneshwari, Advocate for the petitioners / Appellants, and Thiru M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition and having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners seek suspension of sentence pending disposal of appeal.

2. No representation for the petitioners. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioners, it is stated that the petitioners have been found guilty of the offence u/s. 138 of NI Act, and the 2nd petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to undergo SI for a period of six months and to pay a compensation of Rs.7,35,544/- to the complainant along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum, in default to undergo SI for a period of three months, for the offence u/s.138 of NI Act, imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level – II, Coimbatore, in C.C.No.259/2018, dated 27-09-2019. On the date of judgment, due to the non-appearance of the 2nd petitioner, the learned Magistrate issued NBW against the petitioners. The petitioners have got fair defence and hence, prayed to suspend the sentence till the disposal of the appeal.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that on the date of judgment, the 2nd petitioner did not appear before the trial Court and hence, NBW was ordered against the 2nd petitioner.

4. This Court has considered the averments made in the petition. Negotiable Instruments Act, has been amended vide Act 20/2018 w.e.f. 01-09-2018 and thereby a new section 148 has been inserted in the parent Act. As per the said amendment, the Appellate Court may order the appellant to deposit such sum which shall be a minimum of twenty percent of the fine or compensation awarded by the trial Court. Recently the Hon’ble Apex Court interpreted the Sec.148 of the Negotiable Instrument Act in Surinder Singh Deswal @ Col.S.S.Deswal Vs Virender Gandhi [Criminal Appeal Nos.917-944 of 2019, dated 29-05-2019] that the Appellate Court shall direct the Appellant / Accused to deposit the sum which shall not be less than 20% of the fine or compensation, either on an application filed by the original complainant or even on the application filed by the Appellants / Accused under Section 389(2) of the Cr.P.C. to suspend the sentence.

5. After considering all the above said aspects and following the dictum laid down by the Apex Court, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to allow this petition and the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on the petitioners by the lower Court alone is hereby suspended till disposal of the appeal subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The 2nd petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-II, Coimbatore, within 30 days from the date of this order.

(ii) The 2nd petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,83,886/- towards the part of compensation amount before the lower Court on or before 03-12-2020.

(iii) Final Order in respect of the deposit amount will be passed by the Appellate Court at the time of disposal of the appeal.

(iv) The 2nd petitioner shall report before the trial Court on the 1st working day of every English calendar month at 10.30 a.m. without fail, until further orders.

The appeal is made over to the Ist Additional District & Sessions Court, Coimbatore. The appeal stands posted to 16-12-2020.

On the failure of the 2nd petitioner, to comply with any of the above said conditions, the suspension granted to him shall stand cancelled automatically and the Magistrate concerned shall take necessary steps to secure the 2nd petitioner / accused.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Ist Additional District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. 2. The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level - II, Coimbatore. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 4. The Petitioners /appellants through their counsel. IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru. R.SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2999/2020 (In C.A183/2020) ****

C.A.No.183/2020 C.C.149/2018 (The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level - II, Coimbatore.)

Offences: u/s.138 of NI Act.

(SI for a period of six months, and to pay a compensation of Rs.83,58,400/- to the complainant along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum, within one month from the date of judgment, in default to undergo SI for a period of three months.)

1. M/s. Sanjay Real Estate, Represented byAuthorized Signatory Mr. K.V.Santhosh

2. K.V.Santhosh (Aged 39 years) S/o. Kumar … Petitioners / Appellants

/vs/

1. Venkateshwaran S/o. Krishnan

2. The State by Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore … Respondents / Respondent No. 1 and 2

This petition is filed by the petitioner / appellant u/s.389(1) of Cr.P.C praying to suspend the sentence till the disposal of appeal. This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. M.S.Murugaraj and B.Sudhakar, Advocates for the petitioners / Appellants, and Thiru M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition and having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard both side.

The petitioners seek suspension of sentence pending disposal of appeal.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been found guilty of the offence u/s.138 of NI Act and the 2nd petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to undergo SI for a period of six months and to pay a sum of Rs.83,58,400/- as compensation to the complainant within one month from the date of judgment, in default the petitioner shall undergo SI for a period of three months, for the offence u/s.138 of NI Act, imposed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-II, Coimbatore, in C.C.No.149/2018, dated 28-09-2020. The learned counsel further submitted that the conviction and sentence awarded by the lower Court is not sustainable and the petitioners have got fair defence and prayed to suspend the sentence till the disposal of the appeal. The learned counsel prayed to give reasonable time to deposit 20% of the compensation amount.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has not raised any serious objection to allow this petition.

4. The petitioners have not paid compensation amount of Rs.83,58,400/- imposed upon them.

6. After considering all the above said aspects and following the dictum laid down by the Apex Court, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to allow this petition and the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on the 2nd petitioner by the lower Court alone is hereby suspended till disposal of the appeal subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The 2nd petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on her executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-II, Coimbatore, on or before 23-12-2020.

(ii) The 2nd petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.16,71,680/- towards the part of compensation amount before the lower Court on or before 23-12-2020.

(iii) Final Order in respect of the deposit amount will be passed by the Appellate Court at the time of disposal of the appeal.

(iv) The 2nd petitioner shall report before the trial Court on the 1st working day of every English calendar month at 10.30 a.m. without fail, until further orders.

The appeal is made over to the IIIrd Additional District & Sessions Court, Coimbatore. The appeal stands posted to 16-12-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The IIIrd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. 2. The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level - II, Coimbatore. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 4. The Petitioners /appellants through their counsel.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2958/2020

1. D.Maheshraja (Age 20 years) S/o.Duraisamy

2. Sivapandi (Age 21 years) S/o.Gopal … Petitioners / Accused No.3 and 5

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, D-3, Podanur (Crime) Police Station, Crime No.1555/2020 Offence: u/s.394 r/w 395, 397 IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court, Madhukkarai.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioners to release them on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. C.Sasidharan, Advocate for the petitioners / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.1555/2020 of D-3 Podanur Police Station (Crime), for the alleged offences u/s.394 r/w 395, 397 IPC, they have filed this petition, seeking grant of bail. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners present.

The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and requested to adjourn this petition to some other day.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 06-11-2020.

Call on 06-11-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, D-3, Podhanur (Crime), Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2957/2020

Bakrudeen Ali Ahamed (Age 40 years) S/o.Mohammed Hanifa … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, C-1, Kattur Police Station, Crime No.110/2020 Offence: u/s.409, 420, 120(b) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. S.Rajendran, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.110/2020 of C-1 Kattur Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.409, 420 and 120(B) IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court. The learned Public Prosecutor present.

At request of the petitioner’s counsel, this petition is adjourned to 10-11-2020.

Call on 10-11-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, C-1, Kattur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2956/2020

Ahamed Kabir (Age 25 years) S/o.Mohammadu … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, B-1, Big Bazaar Police Station, Crime No.979/2020 Offence: u/s. 386, 506(ii) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.979/2020 of B-1 Big Bazaar Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.386 and 506(ii) IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence, the accused persons intercepted the defacto complainant and snatched Rs.500/- from the defcto complainant by showing knife and also threatened him with dire consequences.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that the petitioner was arrested by the respondent police only on suspicion. The petitioner is no way connected with the case. The petitioner filed bail petition before the Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore and the same was dismissed by the learned Magistrate on 22-10-2020. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in judicial custody from 02-10-2020 and prayed to release the petitioner on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that the defacto complainant is running a milk booth. On the date of occurrence, when the defacto complainant was in the milk booth, the petitioner came there and demanded money for consuming liquor. The defacto complainant replied that he does not have any amount. All of a sudden, the petitioner took a knife and threatened the defacto complainant and snatched Rs.500/- from the defacto complainant. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that except the present case, three previous cases in Crime No.1644/2009, 1764/2013 and 206/2017 are pending against the petitioner. Further in this case, investigation is not yet completed.

5. This Court has considered the submissions made by either side. The petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody for the offence u/s.386 and 506(ii) IPC and the petitioner is in judicial custody from 02-10-2020. According to the petitioner, the petitioner was arrested by the respondent police only on suspicion and he is no way connected with the case. It appears from the representation made by the learned Public Prosecutor, except the present case, three previous cases in Crime No.1644/2009, 1764/2013 and 206/2017 are pending against the petitioner. Further in this case, investigation is not yet completed.

6. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of offence, period of detention, number of cases pending against the petitioner, considering the stage of investigation, and other circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore.

(ii) The petitioner is directed to file surety document before the Court concerned in advance and thereafter the learned Magistrate shall allot time to verify the sureties.

(iii) The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police, daily twice i.e., daily at 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., until further orders.

(iv) The petitioner or his men shall not tamper the evidence.

(v) The petitioner shall not abscond and he shall co-operate with the investigation agency as and when required.

(vi) Violation of any of the condition imposed by this Court will result in cancellation of the bail.

(vii) In case of the condition No.(i) to (v) are violated, it is open to the investigating officer to file appropriate application before the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail granted hereby, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji /vs/ State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore. 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore. 3. Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 4. The Inspector of Police, B-1, Big Bazaar Police Station, Coimbatore. 5. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2953/2020

Manirathinam (Age 23 years) S/o.Palanicahmy … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, Karumathampatti Police Station, Crime No.1943/2020. Offence: u/s.294(b), 323, 324, 341, 342, 364(A), 506(ii) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. N.Karthik, H.Noorul Ameen and S.Balaji, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1943/2020 of Karumathampatti Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.294(b), 323, 324, 341, 364(A) and 506(ii) IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence, the accused persons kidnapped the defcto complainant and assaulted the defacto complainant and caused injuries to the defacto complainant and also threatened the defacto complainant with dire consequences.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that in this case, co-accused are released on bail by this court. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he never indulged any activities as alleged and he has not committed any offence and he is in judicial custody from 26-09-2020 and prayed to release the petitioner on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and raised objection to the release the petitioner on bail. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that there are seven accused in this case. The occurrence said to have been happened on 26-09-2020 and the same was reported to the respondent police on the same day. The defacto complainant is working as power-loom labourer. One year before, the defacto complainant came to know about one Murthy through his friends. The said Murthy is a prostitution agent and he is doing the said business. The said Murthy asked the defacto complainant to bring some persons and he will pay commission for the same. Thereafter the defacto complainant introduced some persons to the said Murthy and received amount from the said Murthy. While so, Mohammed Sabi @ Madan contacted the defacto complainant and enquired about the availability of ladies. Thereafter the defacto complainant received Rs.3,000/- from the said Mohammed Sabi @ Madan and informed him that Murthy will contact him. But Murthy did not contact the said Mohammed Sabi @ Madan. Thereafter Madan contacted the defacto complainant and return of the amount. But the defacto complainant switched off his phone. While so, on 26-09-2020, at about 3.30 p.m., the defacto complainant was returning to him home, two persons came in a motor cycle and intercepted the defacto complainant and enquired about the availability of ladies. The defacto complainant replied that he did not know anybody. All of a sudden, one Swift car came there and the said persons pushed the defacto complainant into the car and they along with Madan kidnapped the defacto complainant in the said car. Further the accused persons assaulted the defacto complainant by using key and hands and caused injuries to the defacto complainant. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that except the present case, five previous cases in Crime No.279/2014, 2055/2020, 1513/2020, 480/2019, 84/2019 were pending against the petitioner. Further in this case, investigation is going on. In the said circumstances, if the petitioner is released on bail, there is every possibility to commit same type of offence and also try to threaten the witnesses and hence, the prosecution raised objection to the petition.

5. This Court has considered the submissions made by either side. The petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody for the offence u/s. u/s.294(b), 323, 324, 341, 364(A) and 506(ii) IPC and the petitioner is in judicial custody from 26-09-2020. According to the petitioner, he has been falsely implicated in this case and he never committed any offence as alleged. Further in this case, co- accused are released on bail by this Court. It appears from the representation made by the learned Public Prosecutor, except the present case, five previous cases in Crime No.279/2014, 2055/2020, 1513/2020, 480/2019, 84/2019 were pending against the petitioner.

6. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of offence, considering the previous antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is of the considered view that the apprehension raised on by the prosecution that if the petitioner is released on bail, there is every possibility to commit same type of offence and also try to threaten the witnesses, is reasonable one. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Hence, this petition is dismissed.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Karumathampatti Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2955/2020

1. K.L. Ani (Age 37 years) S/o.K.R.Narayanan

2. K.P.Nidhin (Age 51 years) S/o.K.R.Babu … Petitioners / Accused

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, Kinathukadavu Police Station, Crime No.1412/2020. Offence: u/s. 379 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Pollachi.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioners to release them on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. N.Priyadharshini, Advocate for the petitioners / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.1412/2020 of Kinathukadavu Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.379 IPC, they have field this petition, seeking grant of bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 13-10-2020, at about 6.30 p.m., the Special Deputy Tahsildar and some other officials were engaged in vehicle checking at Kinathukadavu Taluk, Veerappagoundanur village. At that time, two tipper lorries bearing Reg.No.KL 04 AD 4421 and KL 63 E 9594 were coming. They intercepted the said lorries. On verification, it was found that the said lorries were loaded with four units of rough stone. On enquiry, the drivers of the lorry have no valid permission to transport the same.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners appeared before this Court and submitted that the petitioners are the drivers of the vehicles. The petitioners filed bail petition before the lower and the same was dismissed by the learned Magistrate. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in judicial custody from 14-10-2020 and prayed to release the petitioners on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that on 13-10-2020, at about 6.30 p.m., the Special Deputy Tahsildar and some other officials were engaged in vehicle checking at Kinathukadavu Taluk, Veerappagoundanur village. At that time, two tipper lorries bearing Reg.No.KL 04 AD 4421 and KL 63 E 9594 were coming. They intercepted the said lorries. On verification, it was found that the said lorries were loaded with four units of rough stone. On enquiry, the drivers of the lorry have no valid permission to transport the same. Thereafter the respondent police registered the case and seized the vehicles along with goods. In this case, investigation is not yet completed.

5. This Court has considered the submissions made by either side. The petitioners have been remanded to judicial custody for the offences u/s.379 IPC and the petitioners are in judicial custody from 14-10-2020. According to the petitioners, they have been falsely implicated in this case. It appears from the representation made by the learned Public Prosecutor, the petitioners are the drivers of the vehicle. The respondent police seized the vehicles since no valid permission was obtained for transporting the goods. In this case, investigation is not yet completed.

6. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of offence, period of detention, and also considering other circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on bail on their executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Pollachi.

(ii) The petitioners are directed to file surety document before the Court concerned in advance and thereafter the learned Magistrate shall allot time to verify the sureties.

(iii) The petitioners are directed to sign before the respondent police, daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

(iv) The petitioners or their men shall not tamper the evidence.

(v) The petitioners shall not abscond and they shall co-operate with the investigation agency as and when required.

(vi) Violation of any of the condition imposed by this Court will result in cancellation of the bail.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Pollachi. 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 4. The Inspector of Police, Kinathukadavu Police Station, Pollachi. 5. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2954/2020

Stalin (Age 19 years) S/o.Samual … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, Pollachi Town East Police Station, Crime No.1396/2020 Offence: u/s. 341, 342, 363, 294(b), 323, 506(ii) of IPC @ 147, 148, 341, 342, 294(b), 323, 324, 364(A), 506(ii) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Pollachi.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. S.Muruganandam, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1396/2020 of Pollachi Town Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.341, 342, 363, 294(b), 323, 506(ii) IPC @ Sec.147, 148, 341, 342, 294(b), 323, 324, 364(A) and 506(ii) IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner present.

The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that connected CMP is posted to tomorrow and requested to adjourn this petition to tomorrow.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 04-11-2020.

Call on 04-11-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Pollachi Town East Police Station, Pollachi. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2952/2020

Johnson (Age 49 years) S/o.Thangaraj … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, Selvapuram Police Station, Crime No.1803/2020 Offence: u/s. 273 and 328 of IPC, Section 7 and 24(1) of Cigarette and other tobacco products Act 2003. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. M.Saravanan and K.S.Balaji, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1803/2020 of Selvapuram Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.273 and 328 IPC and u/s.7 and 24(1) of Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner present.

The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that reply has not been received and requested to adjourn this petition to some other day.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 06-11-2020.

Call on 06-11-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Selvapuram Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2951/2020

1. Praveen Ducklass (Age 25 years) S/o.Selvaraj

2. Simon Kristopher (Age 26 years) S/o.Mariyasoosai … Petitioners / Accused No.1 and 2

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, D3, Podhanur Police Station, Crime No.1579/2020. Offence: u/s. 120(B), 341, 294(b), 307, 506(ii) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court, Madhukkarai.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioners to release them on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. S.Rajendran, Advocate for the petitioners / Accused No.1 and 2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.1579/2020 of D-3 Podhanur Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.120(B), 341, 294(b), 307 and 506(ii) IPC, they have filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners appeared before this Court and submitted his arguments.

The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted his arguments. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that the petitioners are the offenders under NDPS Act and he prays time to submit the particulars of the NDPS Act.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 06-11-2020.

Call on 06-11-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, D-3, Podhanur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2947/2020

Fenn Benjamin Samson (Age 55 years) S/o.Bobby Samson … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, Chettipalayam Police Station, Crime No.45/2020. Offence: u/s. 306 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court, Madukkarai.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. P.R.Rameshkumar and M.Madhivanan, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.45/2020 of Chettipalayam Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.306 IPC @ Sec.174 of Cr.P.C., he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court.

The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that connected CMP is posted to 04-11-2020 and requested to adjourn this petition to 04-11-2020.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 04-11-2020.

Call on 04-11-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Chettipalayam Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2948/2020

1. Rajesh (Age 22 years) S/o.Kalidass

2. Aswin (Age 26 years) S/o.Udhayakumar … Petitioners / Accused No.2 and 7

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, C-4 Rathinapuri Police Station, Crime No.949/2020. Offence: u/s. 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 307 and 506(ii) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioners to release them on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. S.Rajendran, Advocate for the petitioners / Accused No.2 and 7 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.949/2020 of C-4 Rathinapuri Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s. 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 307 and 506(ii) IPC, they have filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence, the petitioners and other accused joined together and picked up quarrel with the defacto complainant and abused the defacto complainant by using filthy language and assaulted him by using Aruval and knife and caused grievous injuries to the defacto complainant and also threatened the defacto complainant with dire consequences.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners appeared before this Court and submitted that the petitioners and the defacto complainant are close friends. The petitioners have been roped in this case, based on the confession of the co-accused. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and they never committed any offence as alleged and they are in judicial custody from 03-09-2020 and prayed to release the petitioners on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that in this case, occurrence taken place on 02-09-2020 and the same was reported to the respondent police on 03-09-2020. There are seven accused in this case. A-1, A-3 and A-6 are still absconding. In this case, two persons have been sustained injuries due to the assault made by the accused persons. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that on receipt of intimation from Coimbatore Medical College Hospital, the respondent police had gone to the hospital and recorded the statement of the 1st victim and thereafter registered the case. According to the statement of the 1st victim, he has completed diploma and stopped his studies. For the past three months, he worked with his uncle. Already, the victim and the accused are having some dispute. On the date of occurrence, the 1st victim and his friend [2nd victim] were standing in front of one temple, the petitioner and others came there and due to previous vengeance, they started to pick up quarrel with the victims and abused the victim by using filthy language and assaulted the victims by using aruval and knife and caused injuries to the 1st victim on his head, hand and shoulders and 2nd victim sustained injuries on his head, shoulder and other parts of his body. Both the victims were admitted in the hospital on 03-09-2020 and discharged on the same day. Thereafter they admitted in a private hospital and got treatment and discharged on 07-09-2020. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that except the present case, three previous cases are pending against the 1st petitioner namely Rajesh. As many as seven previous cases are pending against the 2nd petitioner namely Aswin. Investigation is not yet completed. In the said circumstances, if the petitioners are released on bail, they may try to threaten the victim again and also try to commit same type of offence and hence, the prosecution raised strong objection to the petition.

5. This Court has considered the submissions made by either side. The petitioners have been remanded to judicial custody for the offences u/s.147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 307 and 506(ii) IPC and they are in judicial custody from 03-09- 2020. According to the petitioners, they never committed any offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Per contra, it appears from the representation made by the learned Public Prosecutor, in this case, during the time of occurrence, the accused persons assaulted the victim by using aruval and due to the assault made by the accused persons, two persons have been sustained grievous injuries. Further except the present case, previous cases are pending against the petitioners. Further in this case, investigation is not yet completed and three accused are yet to be secured.

6. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of offence, manner of offence said to have been committed by the petitioners, and considering previous antecedents of the petitioners, considering other circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

Hence, this petition is dismissed.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, C-4, Rathinapuri Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2949/2020 and 2950/2020

1. Praveen (Age 29 years) S/o.Vijayan

2. Karthik @ Beedi Karthik (Age 25 years) S/o.Subramani

3. Karankumar (Age 24 years) S/o.Jeeva Rathinam … Petitioners in C.M.P.2949/2020 / Accused No.2, 4 and 5

1. Aravind @ Aravind Kumar (Age 24 years) S/o.Durairaj

2. Alex @ Alexander (Age 25 years) S/o.James … Petitioners in C.M.P.2950/2020 / Accused No.7 and 8

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, C4 Rathinapuri Police Station, Crime No.1095/2020. Offence: u/s. 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) 307 and of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Coimbatore.)

These two petitions filed on behalf of the petitioners in the respective petitions to release them on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

These two petitions are coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. S.Rajendran, Advocate for the petitioners in C.M.P.2949/2020, and Thiru. K.Sakthivel, Advocate for the petitioners in C.M.P.2950/2020, and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petitions submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

COMMON ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners in the respective petitions are the accused in Crime No.1095/2020 for the alleged offences u/s.147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) and 307 IPC, they have filed these two petitions separately, seeking grant of bail.

The learned counsels appearing for the petitioners in the respective petitions appeared before this Court and requested to adjourn the petitions to 05-11-2020.

The learned Public Prosecutor present.

At request of the petitioners’ counsel, this Court does incline to adjourn the petitions to 05-11-2020.

Call on 05-11-2020.

This common order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, C-4, Rathinapuri Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsels for the Petitioners in the respective petitions / Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2946/2020

Jabamani Andrews (Age 24 years) S/o.Augustin … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/

State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, E-1, Singanallur Police Station, Crime No.1834/2020. Offence: u/s. 457, 380, 302 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No. 3, Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. P.Balasubramanain and K.Chinnadurai, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1834/2020 of E-1 Singanallur Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.457, 380, 302 IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court.

The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that reply has not been received and requested to adjourn this petition to some other day.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 10-11-2020.

Call on 10-11-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, E-1, Singanallur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2945/2020

Manoj @ Manoj kumar (Age 47 years) S/o.Gangatharan … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, B-1, Bazar Police Station, Crime No.975/2020 Offence: u/s. 302, 380 and 120(B) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No. 5, Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. S.S.M.Abdul Khadir, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.975/2020 of B-1 Bazaar Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.302, 380 and 120(B) of IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and requested to adjourn this petition to next week.

The learned Public Prosecutor present.

At request of the petitioner’s counsel, this petition is adjourned to 10-11-2020.

Call on 10-11-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, B-1, Bazar Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2944/2020

Subramaniam (Age 55 years)(A-2) S/o.Nanjappakonar … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, D-4, Kuniyamuthur Police Station, Crime No.1166/2020 Offence: u/s.147, 448, 342, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC and u/s.3 of TNPPDL Act. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.7, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks time extension of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2527/2020, dated 30-09-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. R.Lakshmana Narayanan and S.R.Muthu Abbishek, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks modification of the condition which is already imposed on them by this court in C.M.P.2527/2020, dated 30-09-2020.

2. No representation for the petitioner. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner by this Court, on 30-09-2020, in C.M.P.2527/2020, with a condition to deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/-, on or before 29-10-2020 along with other conditions. The petitioner could not be able to materialize Rs.5,00,000/- to deposit before the Court concerned, due to his financial inability and he is attempting to materialize the same in the near future and thereby the petitioner prays to grant further two months time to deposit the said amount.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that in this case, the accused persons damaged the property worth about more than twenty lakhs.

4. This Court has perused the averments stated in the petition. The petitioner submitted that he could not able to mobilize the amount and deposit the same into the Court as ordered by this Court. The reason stated by the petitioner is satisfied. Hence, this Court is inclined to extend time up to 30-11-2020 to the petitioner to deposit the amount and as such the petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- before the Judicial Magistrate No.7, Coimbatore, on or before 30-11-2020, failing which this time extension order shall stand automatically cancelled and the earlier order in C.M.P.2527/2020, dated 30-09-2020 passed by this Court stands good in all other aspects and the petition is ordered accordingly.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.7, Coimbatore. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, D-4, Kuniyamuthur Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2943/2020

S.Dhanushkodi (Age 54 years) S/o.Sankaralingam … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, D-1, Ramanathapuram (L & O) Police Station, Crime No.1738/2020 Offence: u/s.294(b), 353 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.6, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks time extension of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2728/2020, dated 05-10-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. S.Elango and R.Boominathan, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks extension of time to comply the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.2728/2020, dated 05-10-2020.

2. No representation for the petitioner. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 05-10-2020, in C.M.P.2728/20202, dated 05-10-2020, with a condition to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate No.6, Coimbatore, on or before 19-10-2020, and execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for the likesum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.6, Coimbatore. The petitioner is unable to arrange the surety within the time stipulated by this Court, due to the sudden death of sister of one of the surety. Hence, the petitioner filed this petition, seeking extension of time to surrender and produce sureties before the Court concerned.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that the prosecution has no objection to allow this petition.

4. This Court has perused the averments made in the petition. The reason stated in the petition is satisfied. Hence, this Court is inclined to extend time up to 30-11-2020 to the petitioner to comply the order passed by this Court and as such the petitioner is directed to surrender and execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties likesum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.6, Coimbatore, on or before 30-11-2020, failing which this time extension order shall stand automatically cancelled and the earlier order in C.M.P.2728/2020, dated 05-10-2020 passed by this Court stands good in all other aspects and the petition is ordered accordingly.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.6, Coimbatore. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, D-1, Ramanathapuram (L & O) Police Station, Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2942/2020

1. P.Parthasarathy (Age 58 years) (A-1) S/o.Palanisamy

2. C.Asai @ Aasaithambi (Age 42 years) (A-2) S/o.Chinnasamy

3. P.Manikandan (Age 42 years) (A-3) S/o.Perumal Thevar

4. C.Manikandan (Age 48 years) (A-4) S/o.Chinnasamy

5. R.Sivakumar (Age 47 years) (A-5) S/o.Raj Thevar

6. R.Moovendran (Age 44 years) (A-6) S/o.Ramasamy

7. R.Thambi Durai (Age 45 years) (A-7) S/o.Rasu Thevar

8. O.Prabhakaran (Age 45 years) (A-8) S/o.Ochaiya Thevar … Petitioners / Accused No.1 to 8

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, Karunya Nagar Police Station, Crime No.12/2019. Offence: u/s.448, 143, 147, 294(b), 323, 506(i) of IPC r/w Sec.4 of TNPHW and 380 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioners seek interim relaxation of the condition imposed on them in C.M.P.No.2801/2020, dated 12-10-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. A.B.Sureshkumar and N.Divya, Advocates for the petitioners / Accused No.1 to 8 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners seek interim relaxation of the condition (up to 2nd week of November, 2020) imposed on them which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.No.2801/2020, dated 12-10-2020,

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners appeared before this Court and submitted arguments.

The learned Public Prosecutor present.

At request, this petition is adjourned to 05-11-2020.

Call on 05-11-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Karunya Nagar Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused persons. IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2941/2020

H.Damodhar S/o.Late.Hariram.L … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

1. State, Rep.by The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore

2. K.S.Dhakshinamoorthy S/o.K.A.Seetharaman

C.A.No.163/2020 Offence: u/s138 NI Act. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level - II, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks extension of time to comply the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.2731/2020, dated 06-10-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. A.G.Sampath Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks extension of time to comply the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.2731/2020, dated 06-10-2020. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that the petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to undergo SI for a period of six months and to pay a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- as compensation to the complainant along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum, in default the petitioner shall undergo SI for a period of three months, for the offence u/s.138 of NI Act, imposed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-II, Coimbatore, in C.C.No.93/2018, dated 06-08-2020. Against the said judgment, the petitioner preferred a criminal appeal along with petition for suspending the sentence till the disposal of the appeal. The said suspension petition has been numbered as C.M.P.2434/2020 and the same was allowed on 02-09-2020. While allowing the said petition, this Court directed the petitioner to execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for likesum each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. Further directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- and 32 days time was granted to the petitioner to deposit the said amount. Again the petitioner filed another petition in C.M.P.2731/2020 and prayed to give some more time to deposit the said amount. On 06-10-2020, this Court allowed the said petition and extended time up to 02-11-2020. The learned counsel further submitted that due to Covid-19 situation, the petitioner is not able to go anywhere and ready the amount. Therefore, the petitioner comes forward with the present petition seeking extension of time.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has not raised any serious objection. 4. Considering the reasons put forth on behalf of the petitioner, considering the prevailing Covid-19 pandemic situation and this Court is inclined to extend up to 03-12-2020 to the petitioner to deposit the amount and as such the petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- before the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-II, Coimbatore on or before 03-12-2020, failing which this time extension order shall stand automatically cancelled and the earlier order in C.M.P.2731/2020, dated 06-10-2020 passed by this Court stands good in all other aspects and the petition is ordered accordingly.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level - II, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2940/2020

Jaganathan (Age 45 years) S/o.Selvaraj … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Crime No.1706/2020 Offence: u/s.324 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sulur.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2569/2020, dated 28-09-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. M.Kalaiselvan, M.Saravanakumar and A.Josan, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.2569/2020, dated 28-09-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 28-09-2020, in C.M.P.2569/2020, with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition for the past 28 days without any violation. The petitioner is the sole bread winner of his family and due to the compliance of the condition, the petitioner is unable to go to his regular work, hence, the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition. Further the Prosecution has no objection to relax the condition totally.

4. Considering the above said aspects, having regard to the period of compliance, nature of offence and also considering the prevailing situation, this Court is inclined to relax the condition totally which is already imposed on the petitioner. Further the petitioner is directed to appear before the Court concerned on all the hearing dates without fail.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2939/2020

Ramasamy (Age 37 years) S/o.Chinnasamy … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Alandurai Police Station, Crime No.783/2020 Offence: u/s.376, 511, 323, 506(i) and 420 of IPC and Section 3(1)(w)(i) and Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989. Through the Special Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Pricipal District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2475/2020, dated 15-09-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. S.Sampath and J.Shrihari, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. S.Marimuthu, Special Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.2475/2020, dated 15-09-2020.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that it is stated that bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 15-09-2020, in C.M.P.2475/2020, with a condition to sign before the Inspector of Police, Bhavani Police Station, Mettur Road, daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition for the past 34 days without any violation. The petitioner is having permanent residence and he will not abscond. In the said circumstances, the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

3. The learned Special Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and requested to adjourn this petition to some other day.

At request of the learned Special Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 04-11-2020.

Call on 04-11-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Special Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Alandurai Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2938/2020

Mr.Ameen (Age 26 years) S/o.Hamsa … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station, Crime No.1380/2020 Offence: u/s.395, 397 and 450 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.6, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2425/2020, dated 03-09-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. M.Sahabudeen, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.2425/2020, dated 03-09-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that bail was granted to the petitioner by this Court on 30-07-2020, in C.M.P.2089/2020 with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition. Thereafter the petitioner filed C.M.P.2425/2020, seeking to relax the condition totally. The said petition was allowed by this Court on 03-09-2020. While allowing the said petition, this Court directed the petitioner to sign before the respondent police once in a week. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition. The petitioner is the sole bread winner of his family and due to the compliance of the condition, the petitioner is not able to attend his regular work and hence, the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that the prosecution has no objection to relax the condition totally.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2937/2020

Lakshamanan (Age 23 years) S/o.Kaliappan … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Crime No.811/2020 Offence: u/s.379 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2367/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. I.Abibor Rahman and S.Vineeth Kumar, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.2367/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 26-08-2020, in C.M.P.2367/2020, with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily twice i.e., daily at 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition for the past 45 days without any violation. The petitioner is a mentally challenged person and he was affected by Acute Psycho Disease and he has been taking treatment at Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore. In the said circumstances, the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2936/2020

Lakshamanan (Age 23 years) S/o.Kaliappan … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Crime No.810/2020 Offence: u/s.379 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2366/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.2366/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 26-08-2020, in C.M.P.2366/2020, with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily twice i.e., daily at 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition for the past 45 days without any violation. The petitioner is a mentally challenged person and he was affected by Acute Psycho Disease and he has been taking treatment at Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore. In the said circumstances, the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2935/2020

Lakshamanan (Age 23 years) S/o.Kaliappan … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Crime No.809/2020 Offence: u/s.379 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2365/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. I.Abibor Rahman and S.Vineeth Kumar, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petitions submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.2365/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 26-08-2020, in C.M.P.2365/2020, with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily twice i.e., daily at 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition for the past 45 days without any violation. The petitioner is a mentally challenged person and he was affected by Acute Psycho Disease and he has been taking treatment at Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore. In the said circumstances, the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2934/2020

Lakshamanan (Age 23 years) S/o.Kaliappan … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Crime No.806/2020 Offence: u/s.379 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2363/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. I.Abibor Rahman and S.Vineeth Kumar, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.2363/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 26-08-2020, in C.M.P.2363/2020, with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily twice i.e., daily at 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition for the past 45 days without any violation. The petitioner is a mentally challenged person and he was affected by Acute Psycho Disease and he has been taking treatment at Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore. In the said circumstances, the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2933/2020

Lakshamanan (Age 23 years) S/o.Kaliappan … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Crime No.805/2020 Offence: u/s.379 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2362/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. I.Abibor Rahman and S.Vineeth Kumar, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.2362/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 26-08-2020, in C.M.P.2362/2020, with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily twice i.e., daily at 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition for the past 45 days without any violation. The petitioner is a mentally challenged person and he was affected by Acute Psycho Disease and he has been taking treatment at Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore. In the said circumstances, the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2932/2020

Lakshamanan (Age 23 years) S/o.Kaliappan … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Crime No.801/2020 Offence: u/s.379 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2361/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. I.Abibor Rahman and S.Vineeth Kumar, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.2361/2020, dated 26-08-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 26-08-2020, in C.M.P.2361/2020, with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily twice i.e., daily at 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition for the past 45 days without any violation. The petitioner is a mentally challenged person and he was affected by Acute Psycho Disease and he has been taking treatment at Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore. In the said circumstances, the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Periyanaickanpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2931/2020

C.Ramasamy (Age 37 years) S/o.Chinnasamy … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Alandurai Police Station, Crime No.784/2020 Offence: u/s.294(b) and 307 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2217/2020, dated 15-09-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. S.Sampath and J.Shrihari, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.2217/2020, dated 15-09-2020.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 15-09-2020, in C.M.P.2217/2020, with a condition to sign before the Inspector of Police, Bhavani Police Station, Mettur Road, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition from 16-09-2020. The petitioner is having permanent residence and he will not abscond. Now the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Alandurai Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2929/2020

M.Satya Moorthy (Age 52 years) S/o.Muthu … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, through the Inspector of Police, Valparai Police Station, Crime No.193/2020 Offence: u/s.409 and 417 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court, Valparai.)

The petitioner seeks extension of time to comply the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.1929/2020, dated 16-07-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. Nagaraj and D.Idhayanesan, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks extension of time to comply the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.1929/2020, dated 16-07-2020.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 16-07-2020, in C.M.P.1929/2020, with a condition to produce two sureties for a value of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Valparai, within 15 days from the date of resuming regular Court working and the petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders along with other conditions. The petitioner’s native place is Udumalpet and he has no relative in Coimbatore. The petitioner is a handicapped person and he is the only bread winner of his family and as of now, the petitioner is residing in the containment zone. The petitioner is an aged person. In the said circumstances, the petitioner is not able to produce sureties before the Court hence, the petitioner prayed to extend time to the petitioner to produce sureties before the Court concerned.

4. Considering the reason stated on behalf of the petitioner, and also having regard to the prevailing situation, this Court is inclined to extend time up to 30-11-2020 and thereby the petitioner is directed to surrender and execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties likesum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valparai, on or before 30-11-2020, failing which this time extension order shall stand automatically cancelled and the earlier order in C.M.P.1929/2020, dated 16-07-2020, passed by this Court stands good in all other aspects and the petition is ordered accordingly.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Valparai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, Valparai Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused. IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2930/2020

R.Ramasamy (Age 48 years) S/o.Rangasamy … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Crime No.1428/2020 Offence: u/s.294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court, Madhukkarai.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.2146/2020, 31-07-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. M.S.Giri Dharan, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.2146/2020, dated 31-07-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 31-07-2020, in C.M.P.2146/2020, with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily twice i.e., daily at 10.00 a.m., and 5.00 p.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition from 25-08-2020. The petitioner is the sole bread winner of his family and due to the compliance of the condition, the petitioner is unable to go to his regular work, hence, the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2928/2020

Ashik @ A.Mohammed Ashiq (Age 20 years) S/o.Abubacker siddiq … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, through the Inspector of Police, D-3, Podanur Police Station, Crime No.817/2020 Offence: u/s.294(4), 323, 324, 269, 270, 506(ii) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court, Madhukkarai.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.1564/2020, dated 09-06-2020.

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him by this Court in C.M.P.1564/2020, dated 09-06-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner, by this Court, on 06-09-2020, in C.M.P.1564/2020, with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition. The petitioner is the sole bread winner of his family and due to the compliance of the condition, the petitioner is unable to go to his regular work, hence, the petitioner prayed to relax the condition totally.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, D-3, Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2888/2020

R. Baskar (37 years) S/o. Rajaram, … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch Police Station, Crime No.32/2020 Offence: u/s.120(B) and 420 IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.7, Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on anticipatory bail u/s.438 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. K.Sethuram, K.Viswanathan and R.Ilayaraja, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till date, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.32/2020 of City Crime Branch, Police Station, since he is apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences u/s.120(B) and 420 IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and yet another accused jointly cheated the defacto complainant.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that the petitioner received notice from the respondent police and the petitioner was directed to appear before the respondent police on 14-10- 2020. The petitioner acted in the official capacity and followed the procedures and sanctioned the loan to the said firm. The petitioner is no way connected with defacto complainant. The learned counsel further submitted that the defacto complainant and his wife created a Memorandum of Title Deed to the bank and executed all the necessary loan documents as per the norms of the Reserve Bank of India and also the rules framed by Karur Vysya Bank. After careful scrutiny of all loan documents, the bank has given credit facilities to the defacto complainant and his wife who are the partners of the firm. The firm is failed to repay the said loan amount. Therefore the bank has initiated recovery proceedings under SARFASSI Act and brings the properties for auction on 08-10-2020. The learned counsel further submitted that the defacto complainant colluded with A-1 and acted against the petitioner. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he never committed any offence as alleged and he will not abscond and he will not tamper the witnesses and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and produced the CD File. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that occurrence happened from 21-12-2017 to 17-09-2020 and the same was reported to the respondent police on 08-10-2020. The defacto complainant is having the land having an extent of 2145 sq.ft. in S.F.No.321/1 of Virumandampalayam village. The defacto complainant pledged the said land with the District Central Co- operative Bank, Kunnathur, Erode and obtained a loan of Rs.7,50,000/-. While so, on 04-09-2017, one Sivakumar (A-1) approached the defacto complainant and offered to purchase the said land for a sale consideration of Rs.50,00,000/- along with the pledged amount. A-1 gave a sum of Rs.1001/- as advance to the defacto complainant. In the year 2017, they settled the amount to Central Co-operative bank and redeemed the documents. A-1 kept the said documents along with him. A-1 gave assurance that he will pay the amount to the defacto complainant. A-1 is running a firm under the name and style of “eSun Tech Micromatics” and he gave assurance letter in his company’s letter pad. A-1 further assured that he will pledge the property with Karur Vysya Bank, Saravanampatti branch and give a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- to the defacto complainant. On 21-12-2017, based on the request given by A-1, the defacto complainant and his wife went to the bank. At that time, A-1 introduced A-2 (petitioner herein), who is the Branch Manager. Both of them assured that the amount will be returned to the defcto complainant. Believing their words, the defacto complainant and his wife signed in the blank documents which were given by them. Thereafter they continuously evaded the defacto complainant. While so, the defacto complainant enquired with the bank and came to know that the amount has been given to A-1. Further A-2 gave assurance to the defacto complainant and stating that A-1 will settle the amount. Thereafter, the defacto complainant came to know that no such company functioned as stated by A-1. Thereafter the defacto complainant came to know that A-1 and A-2 jointly cheated him. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that in this case, the accused persons created a bogus company and bogus partnership deed and by using the said documents, they cheated the defacto complainant. Further in this case, investigation is not yet completed and A-1 is also still absconding. In the said circumstances, if anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, the same will cause prejudice to the investigation agency and hence prayed to dismiss the petition.

5. This Court has considered the submissions made by either side and perused the CD File. The respondent police registered the case against the petitioner and yet another accused for the offence u/s.120(B) and 420 IPC. According to the petitioner, the petitioner acted in the official capacity and followed the procedures and sanctioned the loan to the said firm. The petitioner is no way connected with defacto complainant. The defacto complainant colluded with A-1 and acted against the petitioner. It appears from the representation made by the learned Public Prosecutor, in this case, the accused persons created a bogus company and bogus partnership deed and by using the said documents, they cheated the defacto complainant. Further in this case, investigation is not yet completed and A-1 is also still absconding.

6. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of offence, and other circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- in the event of their arrest or the petitioners shall surrender before the Judicial Magistrate No.7, Coimbatore, and execute a bond of Rs.10,000/- within 15 days from the date of this order.

(iii) The petitioner shall produce two sureties likesum each to the value of Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.7, Coimbatore, within 15 days from the date of this order.

(iv) The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police daily at 05.30 p.m., further orders.

(v) The petitioner or his men shall not tamper the evidence.

(vi) The petitioner shall not abscond and he shall co-operate with the investigation agency as and when required.

(vii) In case of the condition No.(ii) to (vi) are violated, it is open to the investigating officer to file appropriate application before the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail granted hereby, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji /vs/ State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.7, Coimbatore. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, CCB Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2885/2020

Sakthivel (Age 42 years) S/o.Babu … Petitioner / Accused No.1

/vs/

State, through the Inspector of Police, Thudialur Police Station, Crime No.1811/2020 Offence: u/s.5 and 7(1) of Lottery Regulation Act. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. C.Dineshkumar, K.Sakthivel and M.Kokila, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused No.1 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1811/2020 of M-4 Thudiyalur Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.5 and 7(1) of Lottery Regulation Act, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and made an endorsement on the petition stating that he does not press the petition.

Memo recorded.

The learned Public Prosecutor present.

In view of the endorsement made by the petitioner’s counsel, this petition is dismissed as not pressed.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION Nos.2878/2020 and 2879/2020

1. Simjith (Age 24 years) (A-3) S/o.Aranth Thakshan

2. Manoj @ James (Age 30 years) (A-4) S/o. Seviyar

3. Sasikanth (Age 28 years) (A-6) S/o.Thempanna … Petitioners in C.M.P.2878/2020 / Accused No.3, 4 and 6

Anoop Kumar (Age 31 years) S/o.Sivaraman … Petitioner in C.M.P.2879/2020 / Accused No.1

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Anamalai Police Station, Crime No.505/2020 Offence: u/s.406 of IPC @ Sec.25(1A) of Arms Act, 120(B) and 406 of IPC @ Sec.120(B), 399, 406 of IPC and Section 25(1)(1B)(a), 27(1), 28 of Arms Act. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Pollachi.)

These two petitions were filed on behalf of the petitioners in the respective petitions to release them on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

These two petitions are coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. A.Nowfal, S.Sheik Mohamed and S.Jafar Sadhiq, Advocates for the petitioners in the respective petitions, and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petitions submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

COMMON ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners in the respective petitions are the accused in Crime No.505/2020 of Anamalai Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.406 of IPC @ Sec.25(1A) of Arms Act, 120(B) and 406 of IPC @ Sec.120(B), 399, 406 of IPC and Section 25(1)(1B)(a), 27(1), 28 of Arms Act, they have filed these two petitions separately, seeking grant of bail.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in the respective petitions appeared before this Court and requested to adjourn the petitions to some other day.

The learned Public Prosecutor present and he is having the reply for the bail petitions.

At request of the petitioners’ counsel, this Court does incline to adjourn the petitions to 09-11-2020.

Call on 09-11-2020.

This common order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Anamalai Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioners in the respective petitions / Accused persons. IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2884/2020

Karthikeyan (Age 23 years) S/o.Vellingiri … Petitioner / Accused No.1

/vs/

State, through the Inspector of Police, D-2, Selvapuram Police Station, Crime No.1671/2020 Offence: u/s.392 of IPC Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. A. Arul Alex and J.Vijay, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1671/2020 of D-2 Selvapuram Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.392 IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 19-09-2020, the petitioner and other accused jointly snatched the cell phone from the defacto complainant.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that on the date of occurrence, the petitioner is the rider of the bike. But he never knows that A-3 is going to snatch the cell phone. At that time, this petitioner voluntarily tried to stop his bike after attempting and A-3 pushed him to go speed. At that time, the bike hit in the centre median and falls down. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner filed bail petition before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore and the same was dismissed by the learned Magistrate on 13-10-2020. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he never committed any offence as alleged and he is in judicial custody from 19-09- 2020 and prayed to release the petitioner on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that occurrence happened on 18-09-2020 and the same was reported to the respondent police on 19-09-2020. There are three accused in this case. The petitioner is A-1. A-2 and A-3 are juvenile. The defacto complainant is working as Lab Assistant in CIT College, Coimbatore. On the date of occurrence, i.e., on 18-09-2020, at about 10.30 p.m., after completing his work, the defacto complainant was on the way to his house in his two wheeler. At that time, three persons came in a motor cycle and one of the persons snatched the cell phone from the defacto complainant’s pocket. The defacto complainant chased them. One particular place, they hit in the centre median and fell down. The general public and the defacto complainant caught hold them and handed over them to the police. Thereafter the case has been registered. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that except the present case three other cases in Crime No.63/2020 (offence u/s.457 and 380 IPC), Crime No.64/2020 (offence u/s.457 and 380 IPC) and Crime No.724/2020 (offence u/s.379 IPC) were pending against the petitioner. In this case, investigation is not yet completed and property recovered. In the said circumstances of the petitioner is released on bail, he may try to commit same type of offence and hence, the prosecution raised objection to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. This Court has considered the submissions made by either side. The petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody for the offence u/s.392 IPC. The petitioner is in judicial custody from 19-09-2020. According to the petitioner, he is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he never committed any offence as alleged. It appears from the representation made by the learned Public Prosecutor, during the time of occurrence, the general public and the defacto complainant caught hold the petitioner and two other accused red- handedly. Further except the present case three other cases in Crime No.63/2020 (offence u/s.457 and 380 IPC), Crime No.64/2020 (offence u/s.457 and 380 IPC) and Crime No.724/2020 (offence u/s.379 IPC) were pending against the petitioner.

6. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of offence, previous antecedents of the petitioner and also considering the manner of offence said to have been committed by the petitioner and other accused, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Hence, this petition is dismissed.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, D-2, Selvapuram Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2675/2020

1. E. Suresh Kumar (Age 42 years) S/o.Eswaramoorthy

2. K.P.Eswaramoorthy (Age 70 years) S/o.Periya Gounder … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, Anti-Land Grabbing Cell, Coimbatore. Crime No.19/2020 Offence: u/s.Not Known Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No. , Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioners to release them on anticipatory bail u/s.438 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. A.Rajeshkanna, S.Nandagopal and A.Tamilvanan, Advocates for the petitioners / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners appeared before this Court and submitted that the dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant is civil in nature. The petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and they have not committed any offence as alleged and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. In support of his arguments, the learned counsel filed various documents.

The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that the case has been registered in Crime No.19/2020.

The petitioner’s counsel as well as the learned Public Prosecutor are ready to argue the matter. The petitioner filed numerous documents along with the petition. Perusal of records and enquiry by 05-11-2020.

At request of both, this petition is adjourned to 05-11-2020.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Anti-Land Grabbing Cell, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

rd Tuesday, this the 03 day of November, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2258/2020

Yuvaraj (Age 37 years) S/o.Chandran … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, Rep. by through the Inspector of Police, AWPS Perur at Podanur Police Station, Now transferred to Vadavalli Police Station, Crime No. Not Known Offence: u/s.498(A) and 406 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.6, Coimbatore.)

The petition filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on anticipatory bail u/s.438 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. P.Ramesh Babu and B.Vinoth, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also hearing both side arguments, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

Heard on both side.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail for the alleged offences u/s.498(A) and 406 IPC.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that the petitioner appeared before the respondent police for enquiry in two instances. Further the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation agency as and when enquired.

The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and submitted that the petitioner did not appear before the respondent police for enquiry.

In view of the matter, this Court directs the petitioner to appear before the Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station, for enquiry. This petition is adjourned to 10-11-2020.

Call on 10-11-2020. Till such time, the Vadavalli Police is directed not to arrest the petitioner.

This order is dictated to steno-typist, typed by her, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 03rd day of November, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, AWPS Perur at Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.