IN the COURT of the DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , MADUKKARAI. Present: Mrs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , MADUKKARAI. Present: Mrs. P. Subbulakshmi.,B.A.,LL.M., Judicial Magistrate, FTC No.I @ ML, Coimbatore & District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai (FAC). Monday, 2nd day of November 2020 CMP.No.765/2020 K. Jeevanantham (26), S/o. Kamalakannan … Petitioner /vs/ State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police, D-3 Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No.1580/2020 … Respondent ORDER: 1. This Petition has been filed by the petitioner through E-Mail. 2. The Petitioner has filed this petition stating that the petitioner was arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 17/10/2020 U/s. 294(b), 387 & 506 (ii) of IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused asked the defacto complainant to give money and for that, the defacto complainant refused to give the same and therefore, the petitioner and his friend threatened the defacto complainant with knife and used unparlimentary words. But the CMP No.765/2020 1/3 petitioner is no way connected to this case and therefore, the petition may be allowed. 3. After receiving this petition, the court sought reply from concerned Police Station by mail. But, the prosecution did not give any reply, though sufficient opportunity is given. 4. From the above and on perusal of records, it comes to know that the petitioner is in judicial custody for the period of 17 days and this is the 2nd bail petition filed by the petitioner. Further, though sufficient opportunity is given, the prosecution failed to send any reply and it shows that the prosecution has no serious objections to allow this petition. Further, considering the COVID-19 period and circumstances of this case, this court inclines to allow this petition with following conditions : 1. The petitioner shall produce 2 sureties likes sum each to the value of Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of the court within 10 days from the date of resuming regular court working day after COVID-19 pandemic. CMP No.765/2020 2/3 2. The sureties are directed to produce their ID Card. 3. The petitioner is directed to Co- operate the investigation and shall not tamper the evidence. 4. The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police for the period of 10 days after lifting the Lock down period. Dictated to Steno-Typist and directly typed by her in court Computer and after taking print out and after Sd/- carrying out corrections wherever necessary and Judicial Magistrate, (FAC) nd pronounced by me on 2 day of November 2020. District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Madukkarai. CMP No.765/2020 3/3 IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , MADUKKARAI. Present: Mrs. P. Subbulakshmi.,B.A.,LL.M., Judicial Magistrate, FTC No.I @ ML, Coimbatore & District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai (FAC). Monday, 2nd day of November 2020 CMP.No.761/2020 Benjamin Paul Pelix (27), S/o. Amalraj … Petitioner /vs/ State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police, D-3 Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No.1580/2020 … Respondent ORDER: 1. This Petition has been filed by the petitioner through E-Mail. 2. The Petitioner has filed this petition stating that the petitioner was arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 17/10/2020 U/s. 294(b), 387 & 506 (ii) of IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the petitoner along with his friend demanded money from the defacto complainant for having drink and for that the defacto complainant refused to give the same and therefore, the petitioner and his friend threatened the defacto complainant with knife. But the petitioner is no CMP No.761/2020 1/3 way connected to this case and therefore, the petition may be allowed. 3. After receiving this petition, the court sought reply from concerned Police Station by mail. But, the prosecution did not give any reply, though sufficient opportunity is given. 4. From the above and on perusal of records, it comes to know that the petitioner is in judicial custody for the period of 17 days and this is the 2nd bail petition filed by the petitioner. Further, though sufficient opportunity is given, the prosecution failed to send any reply and it shows that the prosecution has no serious objections to allow this petition. Further, considering the COVID-19 period and circumstances of this case, this court inclines to allow this petition with following conditions : 1. The petitioner shall produce 2 sureties likes sum each to the value of Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of the court within 10 days from the date of resuming regular court working day after COVID-19 pandemic. 2. The sureties are directed to produce their ID Card. CMP No.761/2020 2/3 3. The petitioner is directed to Co- operate the investigation and shall not tamper the evidence. 4. The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police for the period of 10 days after lifting the Lock down period. Dictated to Steno-Typist and directly typed by her in court Computer and after taking print out and after Sd/- carrying out corrections wherever necessary and Judicial Magistrate, (FAC) nd pronounced by me on 2 day of November 2020. District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Madukkarai. CMP No.761/2020 3/3 IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , MADUKKARAI. Present: Mrs. P. Subbulakshmi.,B.A.,LL.M., Judicial Magistrate, FTC No.I @ ML, Coimbatore & District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai (FAC). Monday, 2nd day of November 2020 CMP.No.762/2020 Nazeer, S/o. Nasar … Petitioner /vs/ State, Rep. By The Sub-Inspector of Police, D-3 Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No.1494/2020 … Respondent ORDER: 1. This Petition has been filed by the petitioner through E-Mail. 2. The Petitioner has filed this petition stating that the petitioner was arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 26/09/2020 U/s. 392 of IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the accused/petitioner snatched the chain weight about 1.5 sovereign. But the petitioner did not involve in this case and he was falsely implicated by the police. Because, in this case, on 26/09/2020, the police officials stopped the vehicle of the accused as he did not wear the helmet and at that time, CMP No.762/2020 1/3 the quarrel arose between the petitioner and the police officials and therefore, the petitioner was falsely implicated by the police. Hence, the petition may be allowed. 3. After receiving this petition, the court sought reply from concerned Police Station by mail. But, the prosecution did not give any reply, though sufficient opportunity is given. 4. From the above and on perusal of records, it comes to know that the petitioner is in judicial custody for the period of 38 days. Further, though sufficient opportunity is given, the prosecution failed to send any reply and it shows that the prosecution has no serious objections to allow this petition. Further, considering the COVID-19 period and circumstances of this case, this court inclines to allow this petition with following conditions : 1. The petitioner shall produce 2 sureties likes sum each to the value of Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of the court within 10 days from the date of resuming regular court working day after COVID-19 pandemic. CMP No.762/2020 2/3 2. The sureties are directed to produce their ID Card. 3. The petitioner is directed to Co- operate the investigation and shall not tamper the evidence. 4. The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police for the period of 10 days after lifting the Lock down period. Dictated to Steno-Typist and directly typed by her in court Computer and after taking print out and after Sd/- carrying out corrections wherever necessary and Judicial Magistrate, (FAC) nd pronounced by me on 2 day of November 2020. District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Madukkarai. CMP No.762/2020 3/3 IN THE COURT OF THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , MADUKKARAI. Present: Mrs. P. Subbulakshmi.,B.A.,LL.M., Judicial Magistrate, FTC No.I @ ML, Coimbatore & District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai (FAC). Monday, 2nd day of November 2020 CMP.No.760/2020 Ranjith (21), S/o. Nagaraj … Petitioner /vs/ State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police, D-3 Podanur Police Station, Coimbatore. Crime No.1580/2020 … Respondent ORDER: 1. This Petition has been filed by the petitioner through E-Mail. 2. The Petitioner has filed this petition stating that the petitioner was arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody on 17/10/2020 U/s. 294(b), 387 & 506 (ii) of IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner intercepted the defacto complainant by showing knife and threatened him with dire consequences. But the petitioer is no way connected to this case and therefore, the petition may be allowed. CMP No.760/2020 1/3 3. After receiving this petition, the court sought reply from concerned Police Station by mail. But, the prosecution did not give any reply, though sufficient opportunity is given. 4. From the above and on perusal of records, it comes to know that the petitioner is in judicial custody for the period of 17 days. Further, though sufficient opportunity is given, the prosecution failed to send any reply and it shows that the prosecution has no serious objections to allow this petition. Further, considering the COVID-19 period and circumstances of this case, this court inclines to allow this petition with following conditions : 1. The petitioner shall produce 2 sureties likes sum each to the value of Rs.