DOCSLIB.ORG

2021 Primary Registration Statistics Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021 Primary Registration Statistics Book MONTGOMERY COUNTY VOTER REGISTRATION STATISTIC BOOK 2021 MUNICIPAL PRIMARY COUNTYWIDE 00000-ELE-008-C Montgomery County Friday, June 04, 2021 Vote Count by County Election ID (N) IS 2021 MUNICIPAL PRIMARY ELECTION: 2021 MUNICIPAL PRIMARY (05/18/2021) County ID County Votes Cast % of County Votes % of Reg. Voters CO46 MONTGOMERY COUNTY 162634 100.00 % 27.32 % Election Totals: 162634 100.00 % 27.32 % 1 Magisterial Districts 00000-DST-009-C Montgomery County Friday, May 07, 2021 Voter Count by Selected District and Party Federal Voter (Y) IS 0 AND Valid Voter (Y) IS 1 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG101 1-01 ADARIAN 1 BLANK 23 CONSERVATIVE 2 CONSTITUTIONAL 4 DECLINE TO STATE 1 DEMOCRATIC 10985 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 1 GREEN 28 IND. 1 INDEPENDANT 11 INDEPENDENCE 1 INDEPENDENT 258 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 110 MODERATE 1 N/A 1 NO AFFILIATION 2155 NO PARTY 11 NONE 90 NON-PARTISAN 613 OBAMA 1 OTHER 82 REPUBLICAN 7973 TEA PARTY 1 UNAFFILIATED 4 UNDECIDED 3 YOUNG OUTSIDER 1 Count of Voters in MG101: 22363 MG102 1-02 AMERICAN 1 American Solidarity Party 2 BLANK 14 DEMOCRATIC 10790 GREEN 23 INDEPENDANT 3 INDEPENDENT 140 JEDI 1 LIBERTARIAN 52 NO AFFILIATION 1206 NO PARTY 5 NONE 54 NON-INCRIMINATING 1 NON-PARTISAN 299 NOT DEMO-REPO 1 1 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG102 1-02 NOT SURE 2 OTHER 51 REPUBLICAN 2373 SOCIALIST 1 UNAFFILIATED 1 UNKNOWN 2 Count of Voters in MG102: 15022 MG103 1-03 AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 1 American Solidarity Party 1 BLANK 12 COMMUNIST PARTY USA 1 DEMOCRATIC 12121 GREEN 18 INDEPENDANT 4 INDEPENDENT 129 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 1 LIBERTARIAN 46 NO AFFILIATION 1230 NO PARTY 13 NONE 93 NON-PARTISAN 250 OTHER 50 REPUBLICAN 1905 TEA PARTY 1 UNAFFILIATED 1 UNDECLARED 1 Count of Voters in MG103: 15878 MG104 1-04 ADARIAN 2 BLANK 28 CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSTITUTION 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 3 CONSUMER 1 DEMOCRATIC 12523 GREEN 29 GREEN PARTY 2 INDEPENDANT 4 INDEPENDENCE 1 INDEPENDENT 220 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 1 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 105 N/A 1 NO AFFILIATION 1867 NO PARTY 17 NONE 92 NON-PARTISAN 468 NOT SURE 2 2 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG104 1-04 OTHER 71 PATRIOT 3 REPUBLICAN 6177 SILLY PARTY 1 SOCIALIST 2 UNAFFILIATED 1 UNDECIDED 2 UNKNOWN 2 Count of Voters in MG104: 21628 MG105 1-05 AMERICAN 1 American Solidarity Party 1 BLANK 23 CENTRIST 1 COMMUNIST 1 CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSTITUTION 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 4 DEMOCRATIC 12645 GREEN 25 INDEPENDANT 3 INDEPENDENT 193 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 132 MODERATE 1 NO AFFILIATION 1906 NO PARTY 13 NONE 109 NON-PARTISAN 521 NOT SURE 1 OTHER 81 PATRIOT 1 PSL 1 REPUBLICAN 6669 SOCIALIST 1 UNAFFILIATED 2 UNDECIDED 1 UNKNOWN 3 WORKING FAMILIES PARTY 1 Count of Voters in MG105: 22343 MG106 1-06 BLANK 21 CONSTITUTION 1 DEMOCRATIC 8847 GREEN 14 INDEPENDANT 2 INDEPENDENT 152 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 2 LIBERTARIAN 60 MODERATE 1 3 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG106 1-06 N/A 1 NO AFFILIATION 1674 NO PARTY 13 NONE 80 NON-PARTISAN 392 OTHER 49 PATRIOT 1 REFORM 1 REPUBLICAN 4683 UNAFFILIATED 2 UNDECIDED 4 UNKNOWN 1 Count of Voters in MG106: 16001 MG107 1-07 American Solidarity Party 1 BLANK 29 COMMUNIST 1 DEMOCRATIC 10537 Ethan's Party 1 GREEN 20 GREEN PARTY 1 INDEPENDANT 1 INDEPENDENCE 1 INDEPENDENT 170 JACOBIN 1 LABOR 1 LIBERTARIAN 62 NO AFFILIATION 1631 NO PARTY 14 NONE 128 NON-PARTISAN 320 OTHER 43 PIZZA PARTY 1 REPUBLICAN 3091 SOCIALIST 1 UNAFFILIATED 3 UNDECLARED 1 Count of Voters in MG107: 16059 MG108 1-08 BLANK 17 DEMOCRATIC 9279 GOOD NEIGHBOR 1 GREEN 17 HALLOWEEN 2 INDEPENDANT 4 INDEPENDENT 165 INDEPENDENT AMERICAN PARTY OF 1 PA INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 1 JEDI 1 4 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG108 1-08 LIBERAL 3 LIBERTARIAN 55 LIBERTARIAN REPUBLICAN 1 NO AFFILIATION 1293 NO PARTY 9 NONE 51 NON-PARTISAN 383 OTHER 39 REPUBLICAN 4387 UNAFFILIATED 1 UNDECIDED 1 UNKNOWN 1 WHIG 1 WIG-REPUBLICAN 1 Count of Voters in MG108: 15714 MG109 1-09 American Solidarity Party 1 ANTIESTABLISHMENT 1 BLANK 11 DEMOCRATIC 6125 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 1 GREEN 23 GREEN PARTY 1 INDEPENDANT 2 INDEPENDENT 143 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 75 N/A 1 NO AFFILIATION 1482 NO PARTY 15 NONE 61 NON-PARTISAN 323 NOT SURE 1 OTHER 57 REPUBLICAN 4037 Count of Voters in MG109: 12361 MG110 1-10 BLANK 19 COMMUNIST PARTY USA 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 1 DEMOCRATIC 13851 GREEN 25 GREEN PARTY 2 GREEN PARTY OF THE US 1 INDEPENDANT 3 INDEPENDENT 279 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 1 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 110 LIBERTARIAN REPUBLICAN 1 5 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG110 1-10 MODERATE 1 N/A 2 NO AFFILIATION 2398 NO PARTY 18 NONE 108 NON-PARTISAN 712 NOT SURE 1 OTHER 64 REPUBLICAN 7598 UNDECIDED 2 UNKNOWN 1 Count of Voters in MG110: 25200 MG111 1-11 AMERICAN 1 BLANK 23 BULL MOOSE 1 CHRISTIAN 1 COMMUNIST PARTY USA 1 CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSERVATIVE INDEPENDENT 1 CONSTITUTION 2 CONSTITUTIONAL 3 DEMOCRATIC 5206 GREEN 20 INDEPENDANT 2 INDEPENDENT 130 INDIVIDUAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 78 N/A 3 NEUTRAL 1 NO AFFILIATION 1226 NO PARTY 6 NONE 43 NON-PARTISAN 284 NOT SURE 1 OTHER 85 PATRIOT 2 REPUBLICAN 3012 UNAFFILIATED 1 UNDECIDED 3 Count of Voters in MG111: 10138 MG112 1-12 AMERICAN EAGLE 1 BLANK 28 BULL MOOSE 1 CHRISTIAN 1 CONSTITUTION 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 4 DEMOCRATIC 7182 DEMOCRATIC PROGRESSIVE PARTY 1 6 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG112 1-12 GREEN 19 INDEPENDANT 2 INDEPENDENT 170 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 1 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 101 MODERATE 1 N/A 1 NEUTRAL 1 NO AFFILIATION 1417 NO PARTY 15 NONE 64 NON-PARTISAN 457 OTHER 102 PATRIOT 1 REFORM 1 REPUBLICAN 5002 UNAFFILIATED 1 UNDECLARED 1 Count of Voters in MG112: 14577 MG113 1-13 BLANK 14 CHRISTIAN 1 CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSTITUTION 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 1 DEMOCRATIC 7954 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 1 GREEN 13 INDEPENDANT 4 INDEPENDENT 161 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 66 N/A 1 NO AFFILIATION 1664 NO PARTY 13 NONE 67 NON-PARTISAN 358 NOT SURE 2 OTHER 60 REPUBLICAN 5510 UNDECIDED 1 UNKNOWN 2 Count of Voters in MG113: 15896 MG114 1-14 ADARIAN 1 BLANK 18 CONSERVATIVE 3 CONSTITUTION 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 4 7 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG114 1-14 DEMOCRATIC 7523 GREEN 17 GUNS AND DOPE 1 INDEPENDANT 4 INDEPENDENCE 1 INDEPENDENT 185 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 1 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 99 N/A 1 NO AFFILIATION 1612 NO PARTY 24 NONE 75 NON-PARTISAN 392 OTHER 69 REPUBLICAN 6206 SOCIALIST 2 UNAFFILIATED 1 UNDECIDED 2 UNKNOWN 1 WHIG 1 Count of Voters in MG114: 16245 MG115 1-15 AMERICAN 1 BI-PARTISAN 1 BLANK 17 CONSTITUTIONAL 2 DEMOCRATIC 3469 GREEN 13 INDEPENDANT 2 INDEPENDENT 52 LIBERAL 2 LIBERTARIAN 34 N/A 1 NATIONAL SOCIALIST 1 NO AFFILIATION 480 NO PARTY 4 NONE 41 NON-PARTISAN 78 NOT SURE 1 OTHER 39 REPUBLICAN 806 UNAFFILIATED 1 UNKNOWN 1 Count of Voters in MG115: 5046 MG116 1-16 BLANK 18 CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSTITUTION 1 DEMOCRATIC 4329 8 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG116 1-16 DEPENDS 1 GREEN 9 GREEN PARTY 1 INDEPENDANT 4 INDEPENDENT 58 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 29 N/A 4 NEUTRAL 1 NO AFFILIATION 619 NO PARTY 1 NONE 53 NON-PARTISAN 77 OTHER 48 REPUBLICAN 988 SOCIALIST 1 UNCERTAIN 1 UNDECIDED 1 Count of Voters in MG116: 6246 MG118 1-18 AMERICAN 2 BLANK 19 CHRISTIAN 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 3 DECLINE TO STATE 1 DEMOCRATIC 11113 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 1 FREE 1 GREEN 19 INDEPENDANT 3 INDEPENDENT 260 LIBERAL 3 LIBERTARIAN 118 N/A 1 NEUTRAL 1 NO AFFILIATION 2610 NO PARTY 28 NO YOU PROBLEMS 1 NONE 135 NON-PARTISAN 848 NOT SURE 5 OTHER 74 REPUBLICAN 8788 RIGHT TO LIFE 1 UNAFFILIATED 2 UNDECIDED 2 UNKNOWN 2 Count of Voters in MG118: 24042 9 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG119 1-19 ADARIAN 1 BIRTHDAY 2 BLANK 17 both 1 CONSERVATIVE 2 CONSTITUTION 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 5 DEMOCRATIC 12116 GREEN 36 INDEPENDANT 7 INDEPENDENT 390 INDEPENT 2 LIBERAL 2 LIBERTARIAN 209 MODERATE 1 N/A 1 NEUTRAL 1 NO AFFILIATION 3316 NO PARTY 25 NON DENOMINATIONAL 1 NONE 136 NON-PARTISAN 1092 OTHER 118 REFORM 3 REPUBLICAN 12768 SOCIALIST 1 THE SURPRISE PARTY 1 UNAFFILIATED 3 UNDECIDED 4 UNKNOWN 1 Count of Voters in MG119: 30263 MG120 1-20 BLANK 26 CENTRIST 1 CONSERVATIVE 2 CONSTITUTION 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 2 DECLINE TO STATE 1 DEMOCRATIC 11744 Democratic Republican 1 GREEN 31 INDEPENDANT 13 INDEPENDENT 342 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 1 LIBERTARIAN 144 MODERATE 2 NO AFFILIATION 3021 NO PARTY 22 NONE 136 NON-PARTISAN 867 10 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG120 1-20 OTHER 96 REPUBLICAN 10761 SOCIALIST 2 UNDECIDED 4 UNDECLARED 1 UNKNOWN 1 Count of Voters in MG120: 27222 MG121 1-21 ADARIAN 1 AMERICAN 1 BLANK 35 CONSERVATIVE 4 CONSTITUTIONAL 4 DEMOCRATIC 18518 FEDERALIST 2 GREEN 27 INDEPENDANT 10 INDEPENDENT 488 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 1 INDIVIDUAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 165 MODERATE 3 MODERN WHIG PARTY 1 MUTUAL 1 N/A 1 NEUTRAL 1 NO AFFILIATION 3830 NO PARTY 35 NONE 164 NON-PARTISAN 1274 NOT SURE 1 OTHER 119 REFORM 2 REPUBLICAN 14726 SOCIALIST 1 UNAFFILIATED 2 UNDECIDED 3 UNKNOWN 1 Count of Voters in MG121: 39422 MG122 1-22 AMERICAN 1 American Solidarity Party 1 BLANK 11 CONSTITUTIONALIST 1 CONSUMER 1 DEMOCRATIC 7141 GREEN 12 INDEPENDANT 2 INDEPENDENT 168 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 1 11 Magistrate ID Magistrate Political Party Count of Voters by Party MG122 1-22 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 79 N/A 1 NO AFFILIATION 1755 NO PARTY 19 NONE 79 NON-PARTISAN 507 OPEN 1 OTHER 61 PATRIOT 1 REPUBLICAN 7016 UNAFFILIATED 1 UNDECIDED 2 UNKNOWN 1 Count of Voters in MG122: 16863 MG123 1-23 BLANK 10 CARE 1 CENTRALIST 1 DECLINE TO STATE 1 DEMOCRATIC 9468 GREEN 24 HUMANITARIAN 1 INDEPENDANT 1 INDEPENDENT 195 LIBERAL 1 LIBERTARIAN 96 N/A 2 NEW
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 17-1200 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- INDEPENDENT PARTY, ET AL., Petitioners, v. ALEX PADILLA, CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE, Respondent. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF OF CITIZENS IN CHARGE AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS --------------------------------- --------------------------------- PAUL A. ROSSI Counsel of Record 316 Hill Street Mountville, PA 17554 (717) 961-8978 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the party names INDEPENDENT PARTY and AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY are so sim- ilar to each other that voters will be misled if both of them appeared on the same California ballot. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................... ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................. ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST ............................. 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................................................... 2 ARGUMENT ........................................................ 3 CONCLUSION ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Southern District of New
    Case 1:10-cv-06923-JSR Document 18 Filed 09/30/10 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE and WORKING FAMILIES PARTY, 10 CIV 6923 (JSR) ECF Case Plaintiffs, MOTION OF THE CITY -against- ORGANIZATIONS OF THE NEW YORK INDEPENDENCE NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; PARTY FOR LEAVE TO JAMES A. WALSH, DOUGLAS A. KELLNER, BRIEF AS AMICI CURIAE EVELYN J. AQUILA, and GREGORY P. PETERSON, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the New York State Board of Elections; TODD D. VALENTINE and ROBERT A. BREHM, in their official capacities as Co-Executive Directors of the New York State Board of Elections Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------X The City Organizations of the New York Independence Party respectfully move for leave to file the Proposed Memorandum of Law of Amici Curiae, annexed hereto as Exhibit A. Annexed hereto as Exhibit B is the declaration of Cathy L. Stewart in support of this motion, and annexed hereto at Exhibit C is a Proposed Order. The City Organizations of the New York Independence Party are interested in this litigation for the reasons set forth in the declaration of Cathy L. Stewart annexed as Exhibit B. The City Organizations of the New York Independence Party respectfully seek leave to file an amici curiae brief in order to provide perspective from the vantage point of the Independence Party organizations of New York City and their members on the impact of New York Election Law Sec. 9-112(4) in light of the decision of defendants on how to treat over voting on the new optical scan voting system.
    [Show full text]
  • With Unions in Decline, Trump's Path to the Presidency Is Unlikely to Be
    With unions in decline, Trump’s path to the presidency is unlikely to be through the Rust Belt. blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2016/08/10/with-unions-in-decline-trumps-path-to-the-presidency-is-unlikely-to-be-through-the-rust-belt/ In this election, Donald Trump has been drawing a great deal of his support from disaffected white working-class voters. Michael McQuarrie writes that Trump’s strategy of courting this group is not surprising; white workers have been slipping away from the Democratic Party for nearly 50 years. Much of this is down to the decline of unions, which in the past had been able to keep white voters anchored to the left. This decline – along with the changing demographics of the Rust Belt- also hurts Trump’s electoral chances; without unions to mobilize them, working class whites are less likely to vote. Donald Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, has argued that Trump’s path to the Presidency was open because of his ability to win traditionally democratic Rust Belt states. Trump’s super PACs, however, are only targeting the Rust Belt states of Pennsylvania and Ohio, along with Florida. This is an extremely narrow map, but one that nonetheless has become something like the common sense of this election cycle. Trump, the argument goes, appeals to uneducated white workers more than any other group. To win, he needs to capture swing states with lots of disaffected white working-class voters. The Democrats are not particularly interested in fighting for these votes. Hillary Clinton’s acceptance speech at the Democratic convention, which seemed to have a word for each part of the Democratic coalition, could only appeal to white workers by mustering a comment on Trump’s hypocrisy (Trump ties are made in China, not Colorado!), a ploy that worked with patrician Mitt Romney in 2012, but is unlikely to work with the new tribune of the white workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Political Parties in Village Elections
    YEAR ACTIVE POLITICAL PARTIES IN VILLAGE ELECTIONS 1894 1895 1896 1897 Workingman’s Party People’s Party 1898 Workingman’s Party Citizen’s Party 1899 Workingman’s Party Citizen’s Party 1900 Workingman’s Party Citizen’s Party 1901 Workingman’s Party Citizen’s Party 1902 Citizen’s Party Reform Party Independent Party 1903 Citizen’s Party Independent Party 1904 Citizen’s Party No Opposition 1905 Citizen’s Party Union Party 1906 Citizen’s Party Union Party 1907 Citizen’s Party Union Party 1908 Citizen’s Party Union Party 1909 Citizen’s Party Union Party 1910 Citizen’s Party No Opposition 1911 Citizen’s Party People’s Party 1912 Citizen’s Party People’s Party 1913 Citizen’s Party No Opposition 1914 Citizen’s Party People’s Party 1915 Citizen’s Party People’s Party 1916 Citizen’s Party Independent Party American Party 1917 Citizen’s Party American Party 1918 Citizen’s Party American Party 1919 Citizen’s Party American Party 1920 Citizen’s Party American Party 1921 Citizen’s Party American Party 1922 Citizen’s Party American Party 1923 Citizen’s Party American Party 1924 Citizen’s Party American Party Independent Party 1925 Citizen’s Party American party 1926 Citizen’s party American Party 1927 Citizen’s Party No Opposition 1928 Citizen’s Party American Party 1929 Citizen’s Party American Party 1930 Citizen’s Party American Party 1931 Citizen’s Party American Party 1932 Citizen’s Party American Party 1933 Citizen’s Party American Party 1934 Citizen’s Party American Party 1935 Citizen’s Party American Party 1936 Citizen’s Party Old Citizen’s
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One: Postwar Resentment and the Invention of Middle America 10
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Jeffrey Christopher Bickerstaff Doctor of Philosophy ________________________________________ Timothy Melley, Director ________________________________________ C. Barry Chabot, Reader ________________________________________ Whitney Womack Smith, Reader ________________________________________ Marguerite S. Shaffer, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT TALES FROM THE SILENT MAJORITY: CONSERVATIVE POPULISM AND THE INVENTION OF MIDDLE AMERICA by Jeffrey Christopher Bickerstaff In this dissertation I show how the conservative movement lured the white working class out of the Democratic New Deal Coalition and into the Republican Majority. I argue that this political transformation was accomplished in part by what I call the "invention" of Middle America. Using such cultural representations as mainstream print media, literature, and film, conservatives successfully exploited what came to be known as the Social Issue and constructed "Liberalism" as effeminate, impractical, and elitist. Chapter One charts the rise of conservative populism and Middle America against the backdrop of 1960s social upheaval. I stress the importance of backlash and resentment to Richard Nixon's ascendancy to the Presidency, describe strategies employed by the conservative movement to win majority status for the GOP, and explore the conflict between this goal and the will to ideological purity. In Chapter Two I read Rabbit Redux as John Updike's attempt to model the racial education of a conservative Middle American, Harry "Rabbit" Angstrom, in "teach-in" scenes that reflect the conflict between the social conservative and Eastern Liberal within the author's psyche. I conclude that this conflict undermines the project and, despite laudable intentions, Updike perpetuates caricatures of the Left and hastens Middle America's rejection of Liberalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Ronald Reagan, Louisiana, and the 1980 Presidential Election Matthew Ad Vid Caillet Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2011 "Are you better off "; Ronald Reagan, Louisiana, and the 1980 Presidential election Matthew aD vid Caillet Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Caillet, Matthew David, ""Are you better off"; Ronald Reagan, Louisiana, and the 1980 Presidential election" (2011). LSU Master's Theses. 2956. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2956 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ―ARE YOU BETTER OFF‖; RONALD REAGAN, LOUISIANA, AND THE 1980 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History By Matthew David Caillet B.A. and B.S., Louisiana State University, 2009 May 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for the completion of this thesis. Particularly, I cannot express how thankful I am for the guidance and assistance I received from my major professor, Dr. David Culbert, in researching, drafting, and editing my thesis. I would also like to thank Dr. Wayne Parent and Dr. Alecia Long for having agreed to serve on my thesis committee and for their suggestions and input, as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University In
    371 /V8 A/O 'oo THE "VIVA KENNEDY" CLUBS IN SOUTH TEXAS THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Joan Traffas, B.A. Denton, Texas December, 1972 Traffas, Joan, The "Viva Kennedy" Clubs in South Texas. Master of Arts (History), December, 1972, 132 pp., 2 tables, bibliography, 115 titles. This thesis analyzes the impact of the Mexican-American voters in south Texas on the 1960 presidential election. During that election year, this ethnic minority was strong enough to merit direct appeals from the Democratic presiden- tial candidate, and subsequently, allowed to conduct a unique campaign divorced from the direct control of the conservative state Democratic machinery. Formerly, the Democratic politicos in south Texas manipulated the Mexican-American vote. In 1960, however, the Chicanos voted for a man with whom they could empathize, rather than for a party label. This strong identification with the Democratic candidate was rooted in psychological rather than ideological, social rather than political, factors. John F. Kennedy seemed to personify machismo and simpatla. Perhaps even more impres- sive than the enthusiasm, the Kennedy candidacy generated among the Mexican-Americans was the ability of the Texas Democratic regulars to prevent a liberal-conservative rup- ture within the state party. This was accomplished by per- mitting the Mexican-American "Viva Kennedy" clubs quasi- independence. Because of these two conditions, the Mexican- American ethnic minority became politically salient in the 1960 campaign. 1 2 The study of the Mexican-American political behavior in 1960 proceeds in three stages.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS
    OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/08/2016 Source: State Elections Offices* SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE ELECTORAL ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR VOTES JOSEPH R. BIDEN (D) DONALD J. TRUMP (R) AL 9 9 AK 3 3 AZ 11 11 AR 6 6 CA 55 55 CO 9 9 CT 7 7 DE 3 3 DC 3 3 FL 29 29 GA 16 16 HI 4 4 ID 4 4 IL 20 20 IN 11 11 IA 6 6 KS 6 6 KY 8 8 LA 8 8 ME 4 3 1 MD 10 10 MA 11 11 MI 16 16 MN 10 10 MS 6 6 MO 10 10 MT 3 3 NE 5 1 4 NV 6 6 NH 4 4 NJ 14 14 NM 5 5 NY 29 29 NC 15 15 ND 3 3 OH 18 18 OK 7 7 OR 7 7 PA 20 20 RI 4 4 SC 9 9 SD 3 3 TN 11 11 TX 38 38 UT 6 6 VT 3 3 VA 13 13 WA 12 12 WV 5 5 WI 10 10 WY 3 3 Total: 538 306 232 Total Electoral Votes Needed to Win = 270 - Page 1 of 12 - OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE BIDEN BLANKENSHIP BODDIE CARROLL CHARLES AL 849,624 AK 153,778 1,127 AZ 1,672,143 13 AR 423,932 2,108 1,713 CA 11,110,250 2,605 559 CO 1,804,352 5,061 2,515 2,011 CT 1,080,831 219 11 DE 296,268 1 87 8 DC 317,323 FL 5,297,045 3,902 854 GA 2,473,633 61 8 701 65 HI 366,130 931 ID 287,021 1,886 163 IL 3,471,915 18 9,548 75 IN 1,242,416 895 IA 759,061 1,707 KS 570,323 KY 772,474 7 408 43 LA 856,034 860 1,125 2,497 ME 435,072 MD 1,985,023 4 795 30 MA 2,382,202 MI 2,804,040 7,235 963 MN 1,717,077 75 1,037 112 MS 539,398 1,279 1,161 MO 1,253,014 3,919 664 MT 244,786 23 NE 374,583 NV 703,486 3,138 NH 424,937
    [Show full text]
  • Jen Metzger Receives Working Families Party Endorsement in State Senate Race
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 16, 2018 CONTACT: Kelleigh McKenzie, 845-518-7352 [email protected] Jen Metzger Receives Working Families Party Endorsement in State Senate Race ROSENDALE, NY — The Working Families Party officially endorsed Rosendale Town Councilwoman Jen Metzger today in her campaign to be the next state senator for New York’s 42nd District. “I am honored to receive this endorsement,” said Metzger. “The Working Families Party stands for an economy that works for everyone, and a democracy in which every voice matters. I am proud to stand with them.” Phillip Leber, Hudson Region Political Director of the Working Families Party, said, “Jen Metzger proves that you don’t need to make a false choice between principled, progressive values, and winning elections. Social movements can only do their jobs if we elect authentic progressives, and Jen Metzger is the real deal.” The endorsement is the outcome of a rigorous application and interview process by the Hudson Regional Council of the Working Families Party, which consists of members of the Hudson Valley Area Labor Federation AFL-CIO, the New York Public Employees Federation, the New York State Nurses Association, New York State United Teachers, Communication Workers of America, Community Voices Heard Power, Hudson Valley Progressives, Citizen Action of New York, and state committee members of the Working Families Party itself. “For two decades now, our state senator has made a career out of taking money from corporate donors and polluters, while giving us handouts,” said Metzger. “I look forward to Friends of Jen Metzger, PO Box 224, Rosendale NY 12472 ⭑ [email protected] ​ ​ partnering with the Working Families Party to support—not block—legislation that meaningfully improves the lives of the people in our district.” Jen Metzger’s campaign website is jenmetzger.com, and voters can also find her on social media at Facebook.com/jenmetzgerNY and Twitter.com/jenmetzgerNY.
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Relations for the Biden Era and Beyond by Ian Bond
    Transatlantic relations for the Biden era and beyond by Ian Bond Most European leaders responded to Joe Biden’s election victory on November 3rd with undisguised enthusiasm. They expect him to repair some of the damage that the transatlantic partnership suffered in Hurricane Donald, but pre-Trump America no longer exists, and European policy must reflect that. Following Biden’s win, the EU published ‘A new shown by his January 25th announcement of EU-US agenda for global change’ in December, protectionist ‘Buy American’ measures, which setting out a number of topics for possible among other things increase domestic content collaboration: global health, climate change, trade requirements for government procurement. and technology, and strengthening democracy. The Biden administration’s first moves in these European representatives in the US should work areas – rejoining the World Health Organisation harder on influencing opinions in the South and the Paris Agreement, for example – have and the Midwest, where Trump’s fans are most been encouraging. But the EU must also learn the numerous. The EU delegation in Washington has lessons of the last four years, in case relations run various outreach programmes, mostly through into trouble again after Biden. universities; it should target these regions more. The larger European states should use their The first lesson is that the US remains a deeply networks of consulates in support of the general divided society. More people voted for Trump in European interest, not just national objectives. 2020 than for any other presidential candidate Though outside the EU, the UK can still use in history, with one exception – Joe Biden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party Schism of 1948
    DR. MiTAU is professor of political .science and cochairman of his department in Macalester College at St. Paul. He is actively interested in state politics, and he is thus especially well qualified to write about Minnesota's recent political history. The Democratic-Farmer-Labor PARTY SCHISM of 1948 G. THEODORE MITAU BEHIND the lively events of the Demo­ Thus the fervor for social justice and cratic-Farmer-Labor party schism of 1948 a economic opportunity has long had organ­ long and complex background of political izational expression in Minnesota, even protest can be traced. As one writer has put though success in national elections has it, Minnesota "through most of its history been rare and erratic. Along with other has shown symptoms of political schizo­ Midwestern states, Minnesota witnessed the phrenia. On the one hand, it was the staid well-known patterns of protest, genuinely dowager, as reliably Republican as its down- active, rich in condemnation of the rail­ East Yankee sisters; on the other, it had skit­ roads, monopolies, and Wall Street, and tish moments during which it produced a proud of the righteous blasts from such brood of third parties or helped raise the "tribunes of the people" as Ignatius Don­ radical offspring of its neighbors."^ Espe­ nelly, A. C. Townley, Magnus Johnson, and cially in periods of economic depression, Floyd B. Olson. The quest for success at the voices of agrarian and urban protest, often polls, which would translate platform and discordant and intense, have risen from the program into actual pubhc policy, caused mining pits of the Mesabi Range, from the leaders of the Populist movement to experi­ slaughterhouses and railroad shops of the ment with various types of political tactics.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Soil Movement in Illinois
    A HISTORY OF THE FREE SOIL MOVEMENT IN ILLINOIS, TOGETHER WITH A REVIEW OE THE KINDRED POLITICAL A N T I-M E R Y MOVEMENTS CULMINATING IN THE EORMATION OE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, . by . AUREKA BELLE KILER. THE FOR THE DEGREE OF A. B„ COLLEGE OF LFl'ERATURE AND ARTS. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS. 1896. PRESS OF THE GAZETTE CHAMPAIGN U, A HISTORY OP THE PREE-SOIL MOVEMENT IN ILLINOIS. TOGETHER WITH A REVIEW OP THE KINDRED POLITICAL ANTI-SLAVERY MOVEMENTS CULMINATING IN THE FORMATION OP THE REPUBLICAN PARTY Table of Contents. Cause of the organization of the Free-Soil party. Names of leaders. Nomination of Taylor by the Whigs. Purposes of the new party. Convention held at Buffalo in 1848. Principles of this party. Martin Van Buren nominated for President. Number of Free-Soil votes cast. Convention of 1852, at Pittsburgh. John P. Hale nominated for President. Votes cast in State and Nation. Decrease in number of votes cast. This the last Free-Soil convention held. Political and Conscientious Free-Soilers. Illinois. No slave State, still there were slaves. Extinct by 1850. Administration of Governor Coles. Elements in the population of the State. Influence of the foreigners. Attitude toward Abolitionists. Judge Cunningham’s experience. Votes cast for Birney, Abolition candidate for President, in 1840 and ’44. Counties in the 4th Congressional District. Abolition votes cast in the 4th district in ’43, *44, '46, •48, for Congressmen. Presidential votes cast in 1848 in this district. Votes were cast for Van Buren and not the principle. Largest anti-Slavery vote ever cast in Illinois.
    [Show full text]