Addressing Anti-Transgender Violence 1 FRIENDS and SUPPORTERS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Leaders in LGBT Healthcare Equality
UCLA Arthur Ashe Student Health & Wellness Center A Division of UCLA Student Affairs Geno Mehalik, Outreach Manager [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE UCLA’s Arthur Ashe Student Health & Wellness Center Named “Leader” in HRC Healthcare Equality Index for Third Year The Ashe Center joins only 418 healthcare providers nationwide to earn the “LGBTQ Healthcare Equality Leader” designation UC LOS ANGELES, CA –Apr. 2, 2018 – The Human Rights Campaign Foundation (HRC), the educational arm of the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) civil rights organization, just released the 11th edition of its annual Healthcare Equality Index (HEI), recognizing The UCLA Arthur Ashe Student Health & Wellness Center as a “Leader” in its efforts to serve the UCLA student community for yet another year. The Ashe Center, a division of UCLA Student Affairs devoted to providing quality, accessible, state-of-the-art healthcare and education to support the unique development of UCLA students, received a similar commendation from HRC last year (“Top Performer”). In 2018, however, The Ashe Center rose to the level of “Leader,” improving on its commitment to inclusive healthcare practices, and expanding on its efforts to meet the needs of all LGBTQ UCLA students. This honor is given to facilities that meet LGBT-inclusive benchmarks that are part of the HRC Foundation’s Healthcare Equality Index, a unique survey that encourages equal care for LGBT Americans by evaluating inclusive policies and practices related to LGBT patients, visitors and employees. The Ashe Center earned top marks in meeting non-discrimination and training criteria that demonstrate its commitment to equitable, inclusive care for LGBT patients, and their families, who can face significant challenges in securing the quality health care and respect they deserve. -
July 25, 2014 President Barack Obama the White House 1600
July 25, 2014 President Barack Obama The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: We write to encourage robust civil society participation in the upcoming U.S.- Africa Leaders Summit, and in keeping with the theme of the Summit, “Investing in the Next Generation,” we urge particular attention to the rights and opportunities of the next generation of Africans who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT). Unfortunately, across much of the African continent today, the contributions of LGBT communities are denied or denigrated; their relationships and organizations are criminalized; and hostile political rhetoric seeks to deny their rightful place in African society. In the face of this repression, civil society leaders are standing up and demanding full citizenship. These brave voices are demanding a better future for all citizens of Africa, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, and the Summit provides an unprecedented opportunity to showcase their investments in human dignity. Given how some African governments deny the rights of their LGBT citizens, and the unique role that civil society plays in defending those rights, we urge you to include civil society voices in the official meeting of African leaders during the Summit. We welcome the opportunity for civil society to convene at a forum two days before the leadership meeting, but that forum is not an adequate substitute for civil society participation in the high-level dialogue with heads of state. Recognizing the need for candid discussion at the leadership meeting, we nonetheless believe that civil society participation could be structured to stimulate dialogue without necessarily limiting honest diplomatic exchange. -
QTGNC Resistance, Neoliberalism, and Social Memory
Bio: Che Gossett is a graduate student in the History Department at the University of Pennsylvania, interested black, queer and transgender liberationist history as well as the politics of mourning, resistance and survival. My paper focuses on the memorialization of Stonewall through the 2009 “Rainbow Pilgrimage" campaign and the ways in which it serves to preserve and construct social memory. I am interested in the ways in which inclusion is mobilized as a technology of governance and domination, enclosing radical spaces and dreams into the fold of the state, while failing to address the needs of the communities out from which those acts of resistance and desires emerged. Finally, I plan to explore the affective responses to Stonewall and Compton's Café uprisings and how the monumentalization of sites of resistance coincides with teleological narratives in which queer insurrection and trauma are seen as vestiges of the past. A close reading of the Rainbow campaign’s description of the “event” of the Stonewall riots raises questions about the politics of memory and memorialization; the archive and history. In Archive Fever Derrida analyzes the violence of the archive, or “archival violence” that imposes a structuring law and order upon memory, domesticating and institutionalizing history, while also homogenizing and flattening its topography of difference and heterogeneity. It is thus, in this domiciliation, in this house arrest, that archives take place…In an archive, there should not be absolute dissociation, any heterogeneity or secret which could separate ( secernere) , or partition, in an absolute manner. The archontic principle of the archive is also a principle of consignation, that is, of gathering together. -
Public Opinion and Discourse on the Intersection of LGBT Issues and Race the Opportunity Agenda
Opinion Research & Media Content Analysis Public Opinion and Discourse on the Intersection of LGBT Issues and Race The Opportunity Agenda Acknowledgments This research was conducted by Loren Siegel (Executive Summary, What Americans Think about LGBT People, Rights and Issues: A Meta-Analysis of Recent Public Opinion, and Coverage of LGBT Issues in African American Print and Online News Media: An Analysis of Media Content); Elena Shore, Editor/Latino Media Monitor of New America Media (Coverage of LGBT Issues in Latino Print and Online News Media: An Analysis of Media Content); and Cheryl Contee, Austen Levihn- Coon, Kelly Rand, Adriana Dakin, and Catherine Saddlemire of Fission Strategy (Online Discourse about LGBT Issues in African American and Latino Communities: An Analysis of Web 2.0 Content). Loren Siegel acted as Editor-at-Large of the report, with assistance from staff of The Opportunity Agenda. Christopher Moore designed the report. The Opportunity Agenda’s research on the intersection of LGBT rights and racial justice is funded by the Arcus Foundation. The statements made and views expressed are those of The Opportunity Agenda. Special thanks to those who contributed to this project, including Sharda Sekaran, Shareeza Bhola, Rashad Robinson, Kenyon Farrow, Juan Battle, Sharon Lettman, Donna Payne, and Urvashi Vaid. About The Opportunity Agenda The Opportunity Agenda was founded in 2004 with the mission of building the national will to expand opportunity in America. Focused on moving hearts, minds, and policy over time, the organization works with social justice groups, leaders, and movements to advance solutions that expand opportunity for everyone. Through active partnerships, The Opportunity Agenda synthesizes and translates research on barriers to opportunity and corresponding solutions; uses communications and media to understand and influence public opinion; and identifies and advocates for policies that improve people’s lives. -
JJPVAMC Named Leader in LGBT
130 W. Kingsbridge Rd Medical Center Bronx, NY 10468 (718) 741-4273 Fax (718) 741-4269 Department of Veterans Affairs Health Headlines For Immediate Release March 28, 2016 James J. Peters VA Medical Center Named as “Leader in LGBT Healthcare Equality” by National Survey from the Human Rights Campaign Bronx, NY – The James J. Peters VA Medical Center (JJP VAMC) has been recognized as a “Leader in LGBT Healthcare Equality” by the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) Foundation, the educational arm of the country’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization. The findings were part of HRC Foundation’s Healthcare Equality Index 2016, a unique annual survey that encourages equal care for LGBT Americans by evaluating inclusive policies and practices related to LGBT patients, visitors and employees. The JJP VAMC earned top marks in meeting non-discrimination and training criteria that demonstrate its commitment to equitable, inclusive care for LGBT patients, and their families, who can face significant challenges in securing the quality health care and respect they deserve. The JJP VAMC is one of a select group of 496 healthcare facilities nationwide to be named Leaders in LGBT Healthcare Equality. Facilities awarded this title meet key criteria, including patient and employee non-discrimination policies that specifically mention sexual orientation and gender identity, a guarantee of equal visitation for same-sex partners and parents, and LGBT health education for key staff members. “Despite all the progress we’ve made, far too many LGBT people still lack inclusive and affirming healthcare. Leaders in LGBT Healthcare Equality are helping to change that, and, in the process, making the lives of LGBT patients and their families better each and every day,” said Chad Griffin, President of the Human Rights Campaign. -
San Francisco Human Rights Commission Executive Director Invited by the LGBT Core Group of the United
City and County of San Francisco HUMANRIGHTSCOMMISSION Theresa Sparks Executive Director COMMISSIONERS Edwin M. Lee Susan Belinda Christian FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Mayor Chair THURSDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2014 Mark Kelleher MEDIA CONTACT: Vice Chair David Carrington Miree, Esq. Social Justice & Policy/Media Relations 415.252.2502 Sheryl Evans Davis Michael Pappas Richard Pio Roda Michael Sweet ****PRESS RELEASE**** San Francisco Human Rights Commission Executive Director Invited by the LGBT Core Group of the United Nations to Speak and Participate in a Panel Discussion with International LGBT Leaders as Part of International Human Rights Day Commemoration at the UN SFHRC Executive Director Theresa Sparks to join international panel to discuss her leadership to further transgender empowerment, provide insight on her experience as a transgender parent and the evolution of traditional familial dynamics, roles, and relationships within the LGBT community. (San Francisco) The San Francisco Human Rights Commission’s (SFHRC) Executive Director Theresa Sparks has been invited to offer initial remarks and participate with an international LGBT delegation in a panel discussion at the United Nations in New York City in commemoration of International Human Rights Day. Sparks was invited by the LGBT Core Group to serve on a panel at the UN Headquarters to discuss her current role in human rights advocacy for the LGBT Community and her experience as a transgender parent. Regarding her invitation to participate in this prestigious event Sparks noted, “I consider this a lifetime opportunity that is both an honor and a privilege. I am deeply honored to join with other international human rights advocates to not only speak to the importance of being free to live authentically as transgender and what it means to be a transgender parent but to also participate in bringing global attention to the lived-experience of transgender people everywhere. -
Minutes from the May 11, 2011 Meeting
City and County of San Francisco Human Rights Commission Contract Compliance Edwin M. Lee Dispute Resolution/Fair Housing Mayor Small and Micro Local Business Enterprise Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender & HIV Discrimination Theresa Sparks Executive Director Equity Advisory Committee (“EAC”) Minutes from the May 11, 2011 Meeting Committee members present: Commissioner Mark Kelleher, Commissioner Faye Woo Lee, Ophelia Williams, Susana Rivero, Grecia Lima, Azalia Merrell, Mira Habiby-Browne, Jane Henzerling., Miquel Penn, Rick Hauptman, Monali Sheth Committee members absent: Commissioner Victoria Ruiz, Joel Brown, Elena Gil, Mollie Ring, Dena Wurmen Staff present: HRC Executive Director Theresa Sparks, David Miree, Linda Janourova, Tamara Sherman (intern), and Zoe Polk Guests present: Rachel Zarrow Call to order, roll call. And approval of minutes: Staff member David Miree called the meeting to order at 5:39 pm and called the roll. A quorum of the EAC was present at the meeting. Due to the regular EAC staff lead being on leave, there were no written EAC minutes from the April meeting to review but the audio version was posted on the HRC Website just prior to the May 11, 2011 meeting Public comment for items not on the agenda: None Welcome and Remarks - HRC Executive Director Theresa Sparks HRC Director Theresa Sparks offered greetings and welcoming remarks to the new EAC members. In her remarks she also informed the EAC of a new staffing “reorg." related to the HRC’s Advisory Committees and the newly formed HRC Policy Group. David Miree, HRC Senior Policy Analyst will be the new lead staff for the EAC with Ms. -
Matthew-Kacsmaryk-Opposition-Letter
Officers December 12, 2017 Chair Judith L. Lichtman National Partnership for Women & Families Vice Chairs Jacqueline Pata National Congress of American Indians OPPOSE THE CONFIRMATION OF MATTHEW KACSMARYK TO THE Thomas A. Saenz Mexican American Legal U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Defense and Educational Fund Hilary Shelton NAACP Secretary Dear Senator: Jo Ann Jenkins AARP Treasurer Lee A. Saunders American Federation of State, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition of more County & Municipal Employees than 200 national organizations committed to promoting and protecting the civil and human Board of Directors Helena Berger rights of all persons in the United States, I write in strong opposition to the confirmation of American Association of People with Disabilities Matthew Kacsmaryk to be a U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Texas. Kimberly Churches AAUW Kristen Clarke Lawyers' Committee for Nominees to the federal courts must be committed to respecting the law, Constitution, and Civil Rights Under Law Lily Eskelsen García core American values of justice, fairness, and inclusivity. Mr. Kacsmaryk does not meet this National Education Association Fatima Goss Graves standard. He is an anti-LGBT activist and culture warrior who does not respect the equal National Women's Law Center Chad Griffin dignity of all people. His record reveals a hostility to LGBT equality and to women’s health, Human Rights Campaign Wylecia Wiggs Harris and he would not be able to rule fairly and impartially in cases involving those issues. League of Women Voters of the United States Mary Kay Henry Service Employees International Union LGBT Animus: Mr. -
Youth Commission Policy & Budget Priorities
ANNUAL REPORT: REVIEW OF YEAR 2013-14 .........-----·· ·················---··············--·················-- ---- - --~·-····· ---------------·· ......--------- Page 1 This page intentionally left blank. SAN FRANCISCO YOUTH COMMISSION 1 DR CARLTON B GOODLETT PLACE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-4532 WWW.SFGOV.ORG/YC [email protected] (415) 554-6446 Page 2 YOUTH COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2013-14 TABLE OF CONTENTS Open letter to the community ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 About us ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Who we are ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Staff & Interns ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Youth Justice Committee Report ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Youth Employment & Immigration Committee Report ........................................................................................................................ -
Transgender Health Benefits Negotiating for Inclusive Coverage
negotiating for inclusive coverage Transgender Health Benefits negotiating for inclusive coverage 1 Transgender Health Benefits 2 negotiating for inclusive coverage Contents Introduction 2 Part 1: Setting the Stage 3 Transgender people in your workplace 3 Terms and definitions 3 Transgender health care 4 Insurance exclusions 5 The argument for (and against) equitable benefits 6 Addressing cost 6 Reality check: the low cost of equitable benefits 7 The benefits of equitable coverage 8 Part 2: Getting to Equitable Benefits 10 Milestone 1: Getting employer commitment 10 Five key strategies 11 1. Gather information 11 2. Build a team 14 3. Create your action plan 16 4. Recruit an ally in upper management who can champion the issue 16 5. Use personal stories that touch your allies’ hearts 16 Moving forward 17 Milestone 2: Negotiating with insurance carriers 18 The path to inclusion 18 Gauging financial impact 18 What will be covered by “inclusion”? 19 How much is covered? 19 Where can services be performed? 19 Who is covered? 20 Watch for barriers to access 21 Watch out for new exclusions 21 Follow-through & follow-up 21 Conclusion 22 References 24 Appendix A: Statements of Medical Necessity 26 Appendix B: Insurance Terminology 27 3 Transgender Health Benefits Acknowledgements Thank you to the many community members, health care providers, and allies who have worked tirelessly to expand access to quality health care for transgender and gender non-conforming people in California. Without these advocates leading the way, we could not have written this guide. Among the many people who have paved the way for equitable health benefits, Transgender Law Center would like to thank the following individuals for their leadership: Cecilia Chung Jamison Green JoAnne Keatley Theresa Sparks Shane Snowdon Andre Wilson Kellan Baker, Center for American Progress In addition, we recognize Genentech for their contribution to this guide. -
Introduction
Introduction Priorities In 2004, Hastings College of Law, part of California’s public university sys- tem, rejected the application of the Christian L egal Society to become a “rec- ognized student organ ization.” That status would have entitled the Christian Legal Society to receive law school funding, use the law school’s logo, and take advantage of its publicity venues to promote its events. Hastings’s policy re- quires recognized student organ izations to be open to any enrolled student, but the Christian Legal Society explic itly excludes from membership people who engage in “unrepentant homosexual activities.” The Christian Legal So- ciety requested an exemption from the school’s policy but was turned down, giving rise to a lawsuit that traveled all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court. Hastings was joined in the defense of its policy by the National Center for Lesbian Rights (nclr), a major lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (lgbt) law reform organ ization with offices in the Bay Area, and Jenner and Block, a large national law firm with an office in Washington, DC, that maintains a specialty in Supreme Court litigation. The power ful alliance proved successful. In 2010, in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg found on behalf of five justices that Hastings’s nondiscrimination requirement was “viewpoint- neutral” under the First Amendment and that the Christian Legal Society was not entitled to an exemption under the Constitution.1 Meanwhile, also in 2010, at the very same time that Hastings awaited the Supreme Court’s ruling, another controversy was brewing just outside its campus gates. -
The Economic and Business Case for Global LGB&T Inclusion
Open For Business – Open For The economic and business case for global LGB&T inclusion global LGB&T The economic and business case for The economic and business case for global LGB&T inclusion By Jon Miller and Lucy Parker About the report Methodology Contents What is the report’s purpose? 3. Re-visited the evidence base to identify 1 About Open For Business 01 This report presents a comprehensive the most robust and up-to-date evidence 2 Executive summary 03 evidence base for global LGB&T inclusion: and data for each proposition. 3 Forewords successful businesses thrive in diverse, 4. Input from civil society organizations, Yvonne Chaka Chaka, United inclusive societies and the spread of including the International HIV/AIDs Nations Equality Champion, anti-gay policies runs counter to the Alliance, the Human Rights Campaign, President at the Princess of Africa interests of business and economic Out Leadership and Stonewall. Foundation, and UNICEF Goodwill development. 5. Interviewed activists on the front-line Ambassador 10 of LGB&T discrimination to ensure Randy W. Berry, U.S. State Department Special Envoy for the What is its scope? propositions are grounded in local country realities, including Jamaica, Human Rights of LGBTI Persons 12 This report sets out the case for inclusion India, Malaysia, Singapore, Nigeria, M. V. Lee Badgett, Professor of and diversity, with a specific focus on Russia and Poland. Economics and Director of the LGB&T. It brings together a broad base Center for Public Policy & of research undertaken from different 6. Commissioned primary research on Administration, University of perspectives and with different consumer attitudes towards LGB&T Massachusetts, Amherst 14 geographical foci, and identifies discrimination (survey data).