DOCSLIB.ORG

TRANSPORT Vision

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TRANSPORT Vision TRANSPORT Vision Connecting people in Sheffield and beyond Sheffield Without action, journeys will get harder Foreword Councillor Jack Scott Cabinet Member for Transport and Sustainability I am pleased to present our Sheffield unattractive, unhealthy and potentially Our vision for transport in Sheffield is Transport Vision. This is the first of two unsafe. People will be disadvantaged and shown below. The way we propose stages to present and consult on the their opportunities reduced. to deliver this vision is shown on the way forward to connect people to places following pages and will be articulated We need to provide the ability for people and the things they do in and around in greater detail in the full Sheffield to change their travel habits, engaging Sheffield. We aim to complete these two Transport Strategy. I look forward to with them in a personal and meaningful stages early in 2018 with the publication working with you to deliver this Vision way. This must be supported by easier of the full Sheffield Transport Strategy. and the critical role transport plays in and more flexible payment methods creating a safer, cleaner, and better We have a number of challenges to solve and a range of options depending on quality of life in Sheffield over the coming if we are to improve the quality of life, journey purposes, time of day and years. environment and range of opportunities personal choice. This will also have to for the people and businesses of be accompanied by a different approach Sheffield, and those who visit our city. to managing demand in some areas, OUR TRANSPORT VISION We need to improve our economy including the allocation and charging of FOR THE CITY OF SHEFFIELD and the range of opportunities for our road space and parking. Capacity will residents whilst providing enough be increased, but to move more people Imagine a Sheffield where everyone housing for the future. Even with better and goods efficiently, not simply more can access opportunities without use of technology for communication, vehicles. transport or movement constraints. people and goods will still need to move We need to maximise the positive and Residents, businesses and visitors around. It is important this movement is reduce the negative impacts on people accommodated in the most sustainable in our thriving city can safely to facilitate inclusive growth in a fair city. and inclusive way, minimising any move themselves and their goods We have to understand the impact that negative impacts and improving the user or products with confidence and transport has on lifestyles, sometimes experience. negative, from noise, air pollution and without delay. The negative impacts New investment is starting to reshape climate change, but often very positive of transport including air quality and our city. Without a change in our in the way it opens up access to jobs, noise are minimised, and safety and approach these opportunities will employment and health opportunities. quality of life is improved in the city as be constrained by a lack of transport We need to plan for, and be agile to, a result. capacity and poor connectivity. Doing the changes that future technology may nothing is not an option. Without action, bring, even if we are not currently certain Reliable and clean journeys for journeys will get harder, making the city of what these might be. everyone in a flourishing Sheffield. 2 Sheffield Transport Vision What does this document do? we will take to minimise the negative Following this Vision, the full Sheffield impacts of growth and to maximise the Transport Strategy will explore the This document is the first stage of opportunities. It also sets out what we issues in more detail to set out how the Sheffield Transport Strategy - our may need to do differently to realise our broad actions will be more clearly Transport Vision. It looks forward over the our ambitions and how we will respond defined and implemented in each area of period to 2034 to understand what issues to changes in technology. Consultation the city. This will lead to an aspirational the city may face when considering the will allow feedback to inform the but deliverable plan of action, starting challenges of sustainable and inclusive development of the Sheffield Transport immediately, including how this will be growth. It will define the broad actions Vision before it is finally adopted. funded. DRAFT DRAFT CONSULTATION APPROVAL TRANSPORT FINAL TRANSPORT LONGER TERM TRANSPORT VISION & ADOPTION STRATEGY DELIVERY CONSULTATION STRATEGY December 2017 January 2018 March 2018 PROGRAMME April 2018 June 2018 EARLY WIN SCHEMES The Transport Vision in Context The SCR and Transport for the North also a competitive city and we maximise the have an extensive evidence base which opportunities this alignment can offer. Sheffield plays a leading role in the wider has informed their own infrastructure We support the Northern Powerhouse Sheffield City Region (SCR) and Northern and investment plans. We will draw from concept which seeks to increase Powerhouse. As such, it is important we their evidence and consultation feedback the critical mass of northern cities, draw from, and influence, wider evidence for the SCR Transport Strategy which will with better connectivity being vital to and policy. be developing in parallel and will present increasing economic “agglomeration” a clear plan for city region and wider At a local level, the city is developing a (accumulated and connected) benefits. transport connectivity. clearly defined plan of action to set out The Northern Powerhouse Independent economic, housing and land use plans Pan Northern alignment is important Economic Review spells out the North’s to meet our aspirations over the coming because of the scale of investment opportunity for growth on a mass scale decades. needed for some of our more significant (850,000 new jobs by 2050). Our plans provide a powerful impetus to plans including High Speed Rail and Trans ensure that transport and connectivity Pennine connectivity. We will align with can support wider objectives. those plans to ensure Sheffield remains LOCAL CONTEXT REGIONAL CONTEXT Fairness Commission & Green Commission SCR IIP Clean Air Strategy SCR TRANSPORT STRATEGY Sheffield Plan TRANSPORT VISION SCR INCLUSIVE INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY City Centre Plan TfN STRATEGIC SHEFFIELD TRANSPORT TRANSPORT PLAN Housing Strategy STRATEGY Sheffield Transport Vision 3 WE ARE SHEFFIELD Why do we need to change? ASAS ACTIVITY ACTIVITY ACROSS ACROSS THE THE CITY CITY CENTRE CENTRE INCREASES, FURTHER PROBLEMS WOULD ASINCREASES, ACTIVITY FURTHERACROSS PROBLEMSTHE CITY CENTRE WOULD BEASBE EXPERIENCED ACTIVITYEXPERIENCED ACROSS QUITE QUITE THE QUICKLY QUICKLY CITY CENTRE INCREASES,INCREASES, FURTHER FURTHER PROBLEMSPROBLEMS WOULD WOULD BEFORBEFOR EXPERIENCED EXPERIENCED EXAMPLE EXAMPLE QUITE QUICKLYQUICKLY. FOR EXAMPLE,FOR EXAMPLE AS SOON AS 2024: Sheffield is already changing - the city’s We need to achieve the right mix of ASAS SOONSOON ASAS 20242024 economy is getting stronger with new transport options, or issues including development including, for example, traffic congestion, air pollution, a AS SOON AS 2024 in the city centre and Advanced lack of opportunity and businesses ONEONE THIRD LONGER LONGER TRIP TRIPS BY BUS Manufacturing Innovation District. We that become inefficient will only ONE THIRD LONGER TRIP BY BUS have had some significant investment be exacerbated. On a wider scale, ONE THIRD LONGER TRIP BY BUS announcements including Boeing, transport can have a detrimental impact RESULTINGRESULTING IN IN FEWER FEWER BUS SERVICES REDUCTION? RESULTING IN FEWER BUS SERVICES REDUCTION? McLaren, a city centre High Speed Rail on longer term climate change. Without PEOPLEPASSENGERSPASSENGERS TALKING TAKING TAKING THE THE BUSTHE BUS SO POTENTIALLY A station, and we know that many other action, and a change in approach, these ANDBUSRESULTING SOPOTENTIALLY POTENTIALLY IN FEWER A CUT A BUS SERVICES REDUCTION? TOPASSENGERS SERVICES (TAKING A CIRCLE THE businesses and investors are thinking problems are only going to become AS A RESULT OF CONGESTION THETHE COST COST OF OF MOVING MOVING OFBUSASAND DECLINE)A RESULT SOPOOR POTENTIALLY AIR OF QUALITY CONGESTION A GOODS AROUND THE about moving to Sheffield. worse and investors may no longer look ANDMANY POOR AREAS AIR QUALITYCOULD BECOME GOODS AROUND THE MANY AREAS COULD BECOME THECITY COST WOULD OF MOVINGINCREASE to Sheffield.With wise investment, MANYASUNPLESANT A RESULT AREAS OFTO LIVE,CONGESTION OF WORKTHE CITY CITY COULD WOULD BECOME INCREASE Despite these positive messages, UNPLESANTANDAND POOR PLAY AIRIN TO QUALITY LIVE, WORK GOODS AROUND THE we can unlock a far greater potential UNPLEASANTANDMANY PLAY AREAS IN COULD TO BECOME LIVE, WORK OR PLAY IN the economic growth we have seen UNPLESANT TO LIVE, WORK CITY WOULD INCREASE improving the quality of life for our AS A RESULT OF CONGESTION AND POOR in Sheffield has not resulted in a less AND PLAY IN residents and visitors alike. AIR QUALITY. THE COST OF MOVING GOODS polluted and more equal city. More AROUND THE CITY WOULD INCREASE. people are employed and skill levels Doing nothing is not an option. TRAVELLINGTRAVELLING ON ON THE THE INNER INNER are rising, but too many people are still We already have a number of issues RING ROAD IN PEAK HOURS missing out on employment and other to face. Capacity on the motorway RING ROAD IN PEAK HOURS MAYTRAVELLINGMAY TAKE TAKE ON THE INNER opportunities. We need to find a way network and junctions with the local RING ROAD IN PEAK HOURS of evolving as a city whilst improving network exceed their design capacity, MAY TAKE2020 the environment and quality of life leading to Highways England raising LONGER for our citizens. Transport has a key objections where they have concerns LONGER20 MANYMANY INNER INNER RING RING ROAD ROAD JUNCTIONS JUNCTIONS WOULD WOULD BE BE role in enabling this, but it is people about developments impacting on MOSTOVERWHELMED JUNCTIONS BY ONTRAFFIC, THE INNER MAKINGLONGER RING GRIDLOCK ROAD, the motorway network.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green and Open Space Strategy 2010-2030
    cover ideas 2/11/10 12:10 Page 1 SHEFFIELD’S GREEN & OPEN SPACE STRATEGY 2010-2030 This document can be supplied in alternative formats, GREAT please contact: Sheffield City Council Parks and Countryside OUTDOORS Tel: 0114 250 0500 www.sheffield.gov.uk 100% When you have finished with This document is printed this document please recycle it on 80% recycled paper DP6690 Open Spaces Strategy 2/11/10 11:19 Page 2 Sheffield’s Great Outdoors Meersbrook Park CONTENTS PART ONE - SUMMARY 3. INDICATED PRIORITIES 22 1. FOREWORD 4 Quality and condition ........................ 22 Wider outcomes and 2. STRATEGIC THEMES management approaches ................23 AND OUTCOMES 6 People ................................................ 7 4. DELIVERING THE VISION ........ 24 Places ................................................ 8 People .............................................. 26 Environment and sustainability .......... 9 Places .............................................. 34 Quality management ........................ 10 Environment and sustainability ........ 42 Quality management ........................ 48 PART TWO - STRATEGY 2010-2030 PART THREE – IMPLEMENTATION 1. INTRODUCTION 12 1. MONITORING AND Vision ................................................ 12 DELIVERY 60 The four strategic themes ................ 13 Leadership ........................................ 61 Relationship with other strategies .... 14 Action planning and involvement .... 61 Process of development .................. 15 2. STRATEGIC PLAN 2. THE SHEFFIELD CONTEXT 18 2010-2030
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Action Plan for Sheffield 2003
    Air Quality Action Plan for Sheffield 2003 Environmental Protection Air Quality Action Plan for Sheffield April 2003 Air quality action planning in Sheffield and Rotherham Status This is the draft action plan for improving air quality in Sheffield. At the present time it does not represent the official position of Sheffield City Council or any of the other bodies and agencies with responsibilities in the area. Local Sheffield City Council Authority: Service Nick Chaplin, Environmental Protection Manager Manager Officer for Steve Simmons contact Address 2-10 Carbrook Hall Road Sheffield S9 2DB Telephone 0114 273 4607 number Email address [email protected] Sheffield City www.sheffield.gov.uk/services/del/ers/Environmental_protection Council Environmental Protection Service website Air quality Sheffield City Centre Clean Air Partnership: partnership www.sheffieldairaction.com websites M1 Corridor Clean Air Partnership www.m1airaction.com 3 Air quality action plan for Sheffield AIR QUALITY ACTION PLAN FOR SHEFFIELD Executive Summary The Issue Poor air quality has been shown to be detrimental to health at concentrations similar to those seen in many parts of the UK. A series of reports have been produced by Sheffield City Council to investigate air quality throughout the City, including most recently the Stage 4 Review and Assessment report published in December 2002. These reports forecast that annual average concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) will exceed the standard laid down in the national air quality strategy in designated Air Action Zones1 in two parts of Sheffield, the City Centre and areas around the M1. The largest contributions to NO2 levels in the two AAZs are from road traffic (for both the M1 and the city centre) and ‘area’ sources (for the city centre alone, covering the domestic, commercial, public and small industry sectors).
    [Show full text]
  • Item 17I DPH Report 2014 Full Report
    C liim ma atte e ChChaanng gee andnd Healtthh: D irre ec ctto o r ofof PPuubblic HeHeaallth AAnnnnuual RRe ep po orr t for ShSheefffiieel d 220014 Sh effi e ld DPH R ep ort Sh effi e ld Cit y C ou ncil To wn H all Pin sto ne Str eet Sh effi e ld S1 2H H October 2014 Ref:DPHR14 Version: Final Sheffield City Council Page 1 of 59 Version History Title Climate Change and Health – Sheffield DPH Report 2014 Reference DPHR14 Status (Draft / Issued) Version Final Date Created October 2014 Approved By Jeremy Wight Audience Public Distribution Various FOI Category Open Author Jeremy Wight et al Owner (if different) Amendment History N/A Review date N/A Comments N/A Table of Contents 1 Introduction: why climate change is the biggest Public Health challenge of the 21st century .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2 How will a changing climate affect health in Sheffield? .................................................... 7 2.1 Direct health effects of climate change and global warming..................................................................... 7 2.2 Indirect health effects of climate change ................................................................................................ 12 2.3 Social and demographic impacts of climate change .............................................................................. 16 3 What should we be doing about it? ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Leyland Torque 44.Indd
    Leyland cover 44 9/6/09 18:53 Page 1 No.44 - SUMMER 2009 www.leylandsociety.co.uk THE MAGAZINE OF Leyland cover 44 9/6/09 18:53 Page 2 PUBLICATIONS FOR SALE Available from The Leyland Society, "Sunnyside", Whitchurch Road, Aston, Nantwich, CW5 8DB. Cheques made payable to Hon. PRESIDENT To be appointed “The Leyland Society Ltd.” please. Prices include P&P. Hon. VICE PRESIDENTS Gordon Baron, 44 Rhoslan Park, The Leyland Buses of Wigan Corporation,..............£7.95 76 Conwy Road, Colwyn Bay LL29 7HR The Leyland Buses of Southport Corporation, ........£7.95 John D. Bishop, 10 Betley Hall Gardens, The Ribble Double Deck Coaches, .........................£8.95 Betley, nr. Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9BB The Leyland Buses of Leigh Corporation, ...............£8.95 Leyland Fire Engines, 1930-1942............................£8.95 Neil D. Steele, 18 Kingfisher Crescent, The Leyland Buses of Burnley, Colne & Nelson......£8.95 Cheadle, Staffordshire, ST10 1RZ NEW TITLES CHAIRMAN, BCVM LIAISON Ron Phillips, 16 Victoria Avenue, The Leyland Buses of Plymouth City Transport ‘FLEET BOOKS’ EDITOR Grappenhall, Warrington, WA4 2PD NOW AVAILABLE, 48pp. Colour laminated cover, Expected price £8.95 EDITOR and SECRETARY Mike A Sutcliffe MBE, ‘Valley Forge’ Leyland Fire Engines. 1942-1960 213 Castle Hill Road, Totternhoe, To follow as soon as time permits. 48pp Fully illustrated and Dunstable, Beds LU6 2DA with a colour laminated cover. Expected price £8.95 MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY David J. Moores, 10 Lady Gate, See the Society website for our other items for sale Diseworth, Derby DE74 2QF TREASURER David E.Berry, 5 Spring Hill Close, VEHICLE REGISTRAR Westlea, Swindon, Wilts, SN5 7BG BUS & COACH PRESERVATION WEBMASTER John Woodhouse CHASSIS RECORDS Don Hilton, 79 Waterdell, Leighton Buzzard, Beds.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Draft SCR Statement of Common Ground.Pdf
    Appendix 1 Final Draft at 17 January 2020 SHEFFIELD CITY REGION STATEMENT OF COMMON GROUND FINAL VERSION JANUARY 2019 1 Final Draft at 17 January 2020 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Signatories 5 3. Strategic Geography 7 4. Key Strategic Matters 9 4.1 Planning for Housing in Sheffield City Region 10 4.2 Planning for Employment in Sheffield City Region 14 4.3 Planning for Transport in Sheffield City Region 19 4.4 Planning for Digital Connectivity in Sheffield City Region 23 4.5 Planning for other Strategic Matters in Sheffield City Region 25 5. Governance Arrangements 27 Annex 28 Glossary of abbreviations 35 2 Final Draft at 17 January 2020 1. Introduction 1.1 This Statement of Common Ground provides a record of agreement on cross boundary, strategic matters between the nine local authorities and other key stakeholders in the Sheffield City Region. It has been produced by the signatory authorities to demonstrate how Local Plans are prepared on the basis of an agreed understanding of the issues facing the City Region. 1.2 The Statement fulfils the requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and has been developed in accordance with the Government’s Planning Policy Guidance. The local authorities directly engaged in the Statement are: • Bassetlaw DC • Barnsley MBC • Bolsover DC • Chesterfield BC • Derbyshire Dales DC • Doncaster Council • North East Derbyshire DC • Rotherham MBC • Sheffield City Council 1.3 Other key stakeholders and signatories to the Statement are: • SCR Mayoral Combined Authority • Nottinghamshire County Council • Derbyshire County Council • Peak District National Park Authority 1.4 An explanation of the key strategic matters and where we agree on these is set out in the following sections, with more detailed information in the annex along with technical issues and links to the evidence base we have developed and continue to maintain.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 5 S H E F F I E L D C I T Y C O U N C I L
    Agenda Item 5 S H E F F I E L D C I T Y C O U N C I L Cabinet Meeting held 23 July 2014 PRESENT: Councillors Harry Harpham (Deputy Chair), Isobel Bowler, Leigh Bramall, Jackie Drayton, Ben Curran, Mazher Iqbal and Mary Lea 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENC E 1.1 Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Julie Dore and Jack Scott. 2. EXCLUSION OF PUBLIC AND PRESS 2.1 No items were identified where it was proposed to exclude the public and press. 3. DECLARATIONS OF INTE REST 3.1 There were no declarations of interest. 4. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING 4.1 The minutes of the previous meeting held on 18 June 2014 were approved as a correct record. 5. PUBLIC QUESTIONS AND PETITIONS 5.1 Public Question in respect of land at the top of the Brindley Estate A representative of the Brindley and Mundella Tenants and Residents Association (TARA) referred to previous correspondence with the Council and Councillor Jack Scott, Cabinet Member for Environment, Recycling and Streetscene around 12 months ago as to the possibility of obtaining permission to be allowed the use of grass land at the top of the Brindley estate, to make it into a fenced play area for local children to be able to play ball games etc. and to take some pressure off the tenants and residents in the area. They therefore asked why it was taking so long for Councillor Scott to give their community a definite yes or no to the request? The questioner then stated that Councillor Scott had told the TARA that the Council had determined the land was to be handed to the parks and recreation department and that there would be allotments allowed on the land.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 4
    Agenda Item 4 SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL Individual Cabinet Member Decision Report of: Executive Director, Place __________________________________________________________________ Date: 9 June 2016 __________________________________________________________________ Subject: Sheffield 20mph Speed Limit Strategy: Responses to a proposal to introduce a 20mph speed limit in Greystones and Whirlow __________________________________________________________________ Author of Report: Simon Nelson __________________________________________________________________ Summary: This report describes the response from residents to the proposed introduction of a 20mph speed limit in Greystones and Whirlow, reports the receipt of objections and sets out the Council’s response. __________________________________________________________________ Reasons for Recommendations: Reducing the speed of traffic in residential areas will, in the long term, reduce the number and severity of accidents, reduce the fear of accidents, encourage sustainable modes of travel and contribute towards the creation of a more pleasant, cohesive environment. The introduction of a 20mph speed limit in this area would be in-keeping with the City’s approved 20mph Speed Limit Strategy. Having considered the objections to the principle of introducing a 20mph speed limit in Greystones and Whirlow the officer view is that the reasons set out in this report for making the Speed Limit Order outweigh the objections. Consideration has been given to objections to the inclusion of a number of specific roads within the Greystones and Whirlow 20mph speed limit area (see paragraph 4.13). Of these it is recommended that the objections to the inclusion of Bents Road and Knowle Lane be upheld. Recommendations: 7.1 Make the Greystones and Whirlow 20mph Speed Limit Order in accordance with the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, omitting Bents Road and Knowle Lane from that Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 6 FORM 2 SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL
    Agenda Item 6 FORM 2 SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL Individual Cabinet Member Report Report of: Executive Director, Place _______________________________________________________________ Date: 11/09/2014 _______________________________________________________________ Subject: Investing in Sheffield’s Local Transport system: Progress on the 2014/15 Capital Programme and the Draft 2015/16 Programme _______________________________________________________________ Author of Report: Dick Proctor; Tel: 2735502 _______________________________________________________________ Summary: The purpose of this report is to outline progress on the Council’s overall transport capital programme for 2014/15; and to provide early guidance on the 2015/16 Local Transport Plan programme _______________________________________________________________ Reasons for Recommendations: Council Officers have worked with South Yorkshire partners and the relevant Cabinet Lead Member to ensure that the ongoing 2014/15 capital programme and draft 2015/16 programme meet the objectives of ‘A Vision for Excellent Transport’, ‘Standing up for Sheffield’ and the Sheffield City Region Transport Strategy. Recommendations: • Note current progress on the overall 2014/15 transport programme • Endorse the draft outline 2015/16 Local Transport Plan programme, subsequent to the Council’s overall budget setting process; • Instruct officers to seek appropriate financial approval for each project through the Council’s formal Capital Approval process. ______________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Staff and Student Travel Survey Summary of Findings, 2019 CONTENTS
    Staff and Student Travel Survey Summary of Findings, 2019 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Trends in Travel Patterns 4 Commuting Patterns - Staff 6 Commuting Patterns - Students 8 Travel at the Start of the Academic Year 11 Business Travel 12 Carbon From Commuting 13 Walking 14 Walking Initiatives 16 Cycling 18 Cycling Initiatives 20 Driving 24 Driving Initiatives 28 Public Transport 30 Public Transport Initiatives 34 3 INTRODUCTION The first Travel Plan Strategy was put future initiatives, ensuring these are in place at the University of Sheffield complementary to the Travel Plan in 2002. Since then there has been an Strategy objectives and targets. This ongoing commitment to promote and is in line with the broader aspirations support sustainable modes of travel. of the University in terms of reducing CO2 emissions. This effort includes the identification, delivery and monitoring of activities In May 2019 the University of Sheffield aimed at improving how students and issued a travel questionnaire to staff staff can access the University. and students – this document details the key findings which will feed into our As part of its Travel Plan Strategy, the Travel Plan. University is committed to reviewing and analysing the travel and transport We aim to survey our University preferences of its staff and students on community every two years to allow a regular basis. for comparison of trends over time. Key findings from the survey and a Questionnaire surveys are used to more detailed, technical report can be assess both the impacts of measures viewed here. and activities delivered to date. They also inform on the development of 4 TRENDS IN TRAVEL PATTERNS An indicator of success within the travel planning programme is the overall change in modal split.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility and Public Transport in Sheffield: Case Studies of Policy
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Accessibility and public transport in Sheffield: Case studies of policy implementation Thesis How to cite: Workman, Helen Mary (1986). Accessibility and public transport in Sheffield: Case studies of policy implementation. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 1986 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.0000de5b Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk D, . A '72,7764.18-1 UfjzF-MtCtab ACCESSIBILITY AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTIN StIEFFIELD : CASE STUDIES OF POLICY IMPLEMENTATION Holen Mary Workman B. Sc. (Birmingharn), M. A. (Sheffield) Thesis subrnittöd", fati ttie" degree of Doctor of Philosophy j ýýn Geography Discipline, Open Univer9ily March 1986. Volume 2 of 2 Aut o VOM"MCA, "td 0414 o% tL cm Jtý4eýýSxýoýJ MiºCCN mve ýc c't At. 3A tý 1' Zx^Cýirý, CC Ir1'ý CHAPTER8 THE ROLE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN ASSISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT MOSBOROUGH 1. Introduction Improvements in bus services in Sheffield since the form- ation of South Yorkshire County Council have been largely con- centrated in the south eastern sector of the city, as was clearly demonstrated in the previous chapter. The relationship between improvements in bus services and the occupation of new housing in this area of the city is examined in this chapter, to test whether South Yorkshire Structure Plan Policy T2 has been successfully implemented with respect to residential facilities (see also Workman, 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 7
    Agenda Item 7 SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL Individual Cabinet Member Decision Report of: Executive Director, Place __________________________________________________________________ Date: 8 January 2015 __________________________________________________________________ Subject: Sheffield 20mph Speed Limit Strategy: Consultation feedback to the proposed introduction of a 20mph speed limit in Hackenthorpe and the area around London Road __________________________________________________________________ Author of Report: Simon Nelson, 2736176 __________________________________________________________________ Summary: This report describes the response from residents to the proposal to introduce a 20mph speed limit in Hackenthorpe and the area around London Road, reports the receipt of objections and sets out the Council’s response. __________________________________________________________________ Reasons for Recommendations: Reducing the speed of traffic in residential areas will, in the long term, reduce the number and severity of accidents, reduce the fear of accidents, encourage sustainable modes of travel and contribute towards the creation of a more pleasant, cohesive environment. Having considered the objections to the introduction of a 20mph speed limit in Hackenthorpe and the area around London Road the officer view is that the reasons set out in this report for making the Speed Limit Order outweigh the objections. The introduction of a 20mph speed limit in these areas would be in-keeping with the City’s approved 20mph Speed Limit Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster Local Plan: Statement of Compliance with the Duty to Cooperate
    CSD12 Doncaster Local Plan: Statement of Compliance with the Duty to Cooperate March 2020 www.doncaster.gov.uk 0 0 Contents 1.0 Introduction …………………………………………………………….. 2 2.0 Consultation on the Doncaster Local Plan and Doncaster Statement of Common Ground……………………………………..4 3.0 Sheffield City Region Statement of Common Ground……….…6 4.0 Summary of the Relevant Strategic Matters……………………...9 5.0 Outcomes of the Duty to Cooperate……………………………….17 Appendix 1: Neighbouring Authorities and Prescribed bodies involved in the Duty to Cooperate…………………………………………………….24 Appendix 2: Collaborative Working with Duty to Cooperate Bodies…………25 Appendix 3: Sheffield City Region Statement of Common Ground………….40 1 1.0 Introduction 1. The Localism Act 20111 and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)2 place a duty on local planning authorities and prescribed bodies to cooperate with each other to address strategic issues relevant to their area during plan making. The duty requires continuous and active engagement during the preparation of the plan. 2. Local planning authorities should make every effort to secure the necessary cooperation on strategic cross boundary matters before submitting their Local Plans for examination. The Local Planning Authority must demonstrate how they have complied with the duty, if they cannot then the Local Plan will not be able to proceed further in the Examination. 3. Local authorities are asked to produce one or more Statements of Common Ground. These statements should set out the relevant strategic matters, priorities and cross boundary issues to be addressed and what potential impact the strategic matters may have. They should contain any resolution/mitigation and monitoring.
    [Show full text]