<<

PHARMACYNOTES

Continued Dosing of Oritavancin for Complicated Gram-Positive Infections Jodi Meyer; Paul Lata, PharmD, BCPS; and Susanne Barnett, PharmD, BCPS

Several retrospective and cohort analyses have suggested that continued dosing of oritavancin is both safe and efficacious for complicated Gram-positive infections, such as - resistant and -resistant enterococci.

Jodi Meyer is a Doctor ritavancin is a antibi- central-line infections, and therapeutic drug of Pharmacy candidate, and Susanne Barnett otic. The US Food and Drug Adminis- monitoring when using vancomycin; addition- is an Associate Professor Otration (FDA) approved oritavancin in ally, administration and line care oftentimes of Pharmacy, both at 2014 for adults with acute bacterial skin and require caregiver support, which may not be the University of 1 7 Wisconsin. Paul Lata skin structure infections (ABSSSI). The an- present for all patients. Concerns also have and Susanne Barnett tibiotic is currently FDA approved for infec- been raised regarding the use of OPAT in pa- are Clinical Pharmacists tions caused by Gram-positive organisms, tients with a history of IV drug use due to the at William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans including methicillin-resistant and methicillin- potential increased risk of line infections or line Hospital in Madison. susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, abuse. Few studies have explored OPAT in this Correspondence: MSSA), a variety of species, and population, and the Infectious Diseases Society Susanne Barnett (susanne.barnett@ vancomycin-susceptible faecalis of America OPAT guidelines recommend that wisc.edu) (VSE). Oritavancin demonstrates concentration- the decision to use OPAT should be made on dependent bactericidal activity and has a half-life a case-by-case basis.7 Thus, patients who are Fed Pract. 2020;37(11):502-504. doi:10.12788/fp.0068 of 245 hours. This half-life allows for treatment deemed inappropriate for OPAT oftentimes re- of ABSSSI with a single 1,200 mg IV dose, which main hospitalized or reside briefly in nursing has been shown to be noninferior to vancomycin facilities solely for administration. dosed twice daily for 7 to 10 days.1-3 Oritavancin’s long half-life and potent ac- tivity against Gram-positive organisms has led PROPOSAL FOR EXPANDED USES to increased interest in off-label use of infre- Although the approved indication for quent dosing intervals, such as weekly, to treat oritavancin is narrow, in vitro studies have complicated and invasive infections. Weekly shown that oritavancin also has activity against rather than daily dosing would allow for less vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and burdensome antibiotic administration regimens rabbit studies have demonstrated its excellent and shorter hospital stays especially for patients bone penetration.4,5 These findings have raised who are not candidates for OPAT. the question of whether oritavancin can be safely and effectively used for infections such Efficacy of Continued Dosing as endocarditis, , and bacteremia, This proposed weekly dosing pattern, referred which are often caused by invasive Gram- to as continued dosing or a multiple-dose regi- positive organisms. These types of invasive in- men, has gained traction in the literature. To fections, particularly when MRSA is implicated, date, no randomized controlled trials have generally require IV antibiotic therapy for sev- been conducted to assess oritavancin’s efficacy eral weeks, often with vancomycin.6 in off-label indications or continued dosing, To avoid long hospital stays solely for anti- but several case reports and retrospective co- biotic administration, health care practitioners hort analyses show promising outcomes.8-16 In will often use outpatient parenteral antimicro- an analysis of data from the Clinical and His- bial therapy (OPAT). However, using OPAT toric Registry and Orbactiv Medical Evalua- presents many challenges due to the need tion (CHROME) patient registry, 32 patients for frequent dosing, the risk of peripheral or received multiple doses of oritavancin for

502 • FEDERAL PRACTITIONER • NOVEMBER 2020 mdedge.com/fedprac complicated Gram-positive infections with a ticoagulants.1 Use of IV heparin within 93.8% overall clinical success rate, including 120 hours of oritavancin administration can success rates of 90.9% (10/11) for general bone falsely elevate activated partial thromboplastin and joint infections and 87.5% (7/8) for pa- time (aPTT) levels; therefore, heparin should tients diagnosed specifically with osteomyelitis.8 not be monitored with aPTT during this period. Patients received between 2 and 10 doses Oritavancin also can artificially prolong interna- of 1,200 mg IV given every 6 to 14 days. John- tional normalized ratio (INR) values for up to son and colleagues report using oritavancin 12 hours, and dose adjustments based on INRs 1,200 mg IV every other day for 3 doses fol- during this window are not recommended. Of lowed by 1,200 mg IV once weekly for a patient note, factor Xa laboratory monitoring is un- with - and vancomycin-resistant affected by oritavancin, as it does not depend Enterococcus endocarditis, resulting in nega- on phospholipid reagents as do aPTT and INR tive blood cultures while on therapy.9 However, measurements. source control via valve replacement and post- Oritavancin has been shown to be well toler- operative oritavancin 1,200 mg IV twice weekly ated when dosed according to both the pack- for 10 weeks was required to fully clear the age insert and continued dosing strategies. The infection. most common adverse effects (AEs) (≥ 3%), Schulz and colleagues published a retrospec- occurring at similar rates to vancomycin, are tive cohort analysis of 17 patients who received nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, and limb multiple doses of oritavancin for complicated and subcutaneous abscesses.1 Infusion reac- bacterial infections, including osteomyelitis, tions also have been reported, although they are pneumonia, and bacteremia.10 They reported usually reversible on slowing or stopping the 100% of patients were either successfully cured infusion. It is worth noting that the use of ori- or had demonstrable improvements in their tavancin for osteomyelitis is not recommended infections by using a 1,200 mg IV loading dose in the product labeling, as an increased rate of followed by 800 mg IV if the second dose was osteomyelitis was observed in the oritavancin given within 7 days or 1,200 mg IV if the sec- vs IV vancomycin groups for the treatment ond dose was given more than 10 days later. of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin Patients received between 2 and 18 total doses, structure infection (SOLO) trials (0.6% in ori- with 6 out of 17 (35%) receiving only 2 doses. tavancin group vs 0.1% in vancomycin group, One patient who received 18 doses was an out- statistical significance not reported).17 However, lier, as her treatment goal was palliative sup- it was postulated that these osteomyelitis cases pression due to an infected endovascular graft were likely present, yet not recognized, at base- that could not be removed. line and were not the result of administering In a published case series, 1 of 10 patients oritavancin. This conclusion is further corrobo- receiving oritavancin for invasive Gram- rated by previously presented research demon- positive infections received multiple doses of strating successful cure of osteomyelitis with oritavancin for an MSSA deep tissue infection.11 continued dosing strategies.12-16 The 3 total doses (strength not reported) were Many patients receiving multiple doses of separated by 19 days and 14 days and resulted oritavancin did not experience AEs or labo- in cure. Several case reports and a retrospective ratory abnormalities.13,15 Four of 17 patients chart review study specifically show the effec- (24%) in one retrospective review experienced tiveness of oritavancin for osteomyelitis caused AEs, including infusion reactions, anemia, and by MSSA, MRSA, and VRE.12-16 However, dos- leukopenia; all were reversible on discontinua- ing strategies varied widely after the initial tion of oritavancin, and contributions of other 1,200 mg IV loading dose. in some cases could not be ruled out.10 One patient experienced taste distur- Drug Interactions, Safety, and Tolerability bance for several hours after each infusion, and Oritavancin has minimal drug-drug inter- a second had documented hearing loss after actions, the most notable being with an- 3 doses of oritavancin in a 33-day period,

mdedge.com/fedprac NOVEMBER 2020 • FEDERAL PRACTITIONER • 503 PHARMACY NOTES

though she had received 6 weeks of IV van- vancin versus 7-10 days of vancomycin in the treatment of gram-positive acute bacterial skin and skin structure 11,12 comycin prior to oritavancin. A patient infections: the SOLO II noninferiority study. Clin Infect treated for daptomycin- and vancomycin- Dis. 2015;60(2):254-262. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu778 4. Sweeney D, Stoneburner A, Shinabarger DL, et al. Com- resistant Enterococcus faecium prosthetic valve parative in vitro activity of oritavancin and other agents endocarditis experienced nausea, anorexia, and against vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant entero- cocci. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(2):622-624. minor liver function test (LFT) abnormalities doi.10.1093/jac/dkw451 after cumulative oritavancin exposure over 5. Lehoux D, Ostiguy V, Vadieux C, et al. Oritavancin 9 pharmacokinetics and bone penetration in rabbits. An- 18 weeks. On discontinuation of the drug, timicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(10):6501-6505. nausea and anorexia improved, and LFTs doi:10.1128/AAC.00981-15 normalized 11 months later. Overall, AEs re- 6. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America ported with continued dosing of oritavancin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus have been minimal and largely reversible, aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(3):e18-e55. doi:10.1093/cid/ciq146 mimicking the AEs in the product labeling for 7. Norris AH, Shrestha NK, Allison GM, et al. 2018 In- traditional dosing. This suggests that using a fectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the management of outpatient parenteral continued dosing strategy may not result in antimicrobial therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(1):e1-e35. worse or more frequent AEs, though random- doi:10.1093/cid/ciy745 8. Redell M, Seirra-Hoffman M, Assi Maha, et al. The ized controlled trials are needed to fully ascer- CHROME study, a real-world experience of single- and tain these preliminary findings. multiple-dose oritavancin for treatment of gram-positive infections. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(11):ofz479. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz479 CONCLUSIONS 9. Johnson JA, Feeney ER, Kubiak DW, Corey GR. The literature supporting the use of oritavancin Prolonged use of oritavancin for vancomycin-re- sistant Enterococcus faecium prosthetic valve en- beyond single-dose administration for ABSSSI docarditis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015;2(4):ofv156. is growing. Continued dosing regimens have doi:10.1093/ofid/ofv156 10. Schulz LT, Dworkin E, Dela-Pena J, Rose WE. Multiple- been well tolerated and have resulted in clinical dose oritavancin evaluation in a retrospective cohort of cure for many patients with barriers to first-line patients with complicated infections. Pharmacotherapy. 2018;38(1):152-159. doi:10.1002/phar.2057 treatment and complicated or invasive infec- 11. Stewart CL, Turner MS, Frens JJ, Snider CB, Smith tions. While randomized controlled trials are JR. Real-world experience with oritavancin therapy needed to concretely demonstrate the efficacy in invasive gram-positive infections. Infect Dis Ther. 2017;6(2):277-289. doi:10.1007/s40121-017-0156-z and safety of continued dosing of oritavancin, it 12. Delaportas DJ, Estrada SJ, Darmelio M. Successful may fill an important treatment niche in this era treatment of methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus au- reus osteomyelitis with oritavancin. Pharmacotherapy. of growing antibiotic resistance and increasing 2017;37(8):e90-e92. doi:10.1002/phar.1957 complexity of patient cases. 13. Chastain DB, Davis A. Treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with multidose oritavancin: a case series and literature review. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;53(4):429-434. Author disclosures doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.11.023 The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest 14. Dahesh S, Wong B, Nizet V, Sakoulas G, Tran TT, Ait- with regard to this article. ken SL. Treatment of multidrug-resistant vancomycin- resistant Enterococcus faecium hardware-associated Disclaimer vertebral osteomyelitis with oritavancin plus . The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(7):e02622-18. do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Front- doi:10.1128/AAC.02622-18 line Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or 15. Foster RA, Philavong KP, Weissman S, Tang X, Book- any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or in- staver PB. Oritavancin for the treatment of daptomy- vestigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete cin nonsusceptible vancomycin-resistant Enterococci prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combina- osteomyelitis. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2018;26(2):97-99. tions—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and doi:10.1097/IPC.0000000000000517 adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy 16. Ruggero M, Ziegler M, Tebas P, Binkley A, Kelly B. Suc- to patients. cessful treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vertebral osteomyelitis with outpatient oritavancin References therapy. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2018;26(3):141-144. 1. Orbactiv [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ: The Medicines doi:10.1097/IPC.0000000000000599 Company; 2019. 17. Corey GR, Loutit J, Moeck G, et al. Single intravenous 2. Corey GR, Kabler H, Mehra P, et al. Single-dose ori- dose of oritavancin for treatment of acute skin and skin tavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin in- structure infections caused by gram-positive bacteria: fections. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(23):2180-2190. summary of safety analysis from the phase 3 SOLO stud- doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310422 ies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(4):e01919- 3. Corey GR, Good S, Jiang H, et al. Single-dose orita- 17. doi:10.1128/AAC.01919-17

504 • FEDERAL PRACTITIONER • NOVEMBER 2020 mdedge.com/fedprac