Illinois Coastal Management Federal Consistency Review for Division Street Bridge Over the North Branch Canal

Illinois Coastal Management Federal Consistency Review for Division Street Bridge over the North Branch Canal

for CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING

DIVISION STREET BRIDGES AND ROADWAY REPLACEMENT

CDOT PROJECT NO. E-1-022

CITY OF CHICAGO

Prepared By WSP USA

30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 4200

Chicago, Illinois 60602

Date: 06/22/2021 June 22, 2021

Federal Consistency Coordinator, Illinois Coastal Management Program IDNR/OWR 60 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 703 Chicago, Illinois 60601

Subject: Federal Consistency Determination Reconstruction of the Division Street Bascule Bridge over the North Branch Canal at Mile 2.99 from Lake Michigan Existing Temporary Bridge (Permit 5-14-9 & 5a-14-9) Proposed Structure No. 016-6209 CDOT Project No. E-1-022

Attention: Mr. James P. Casey

Dear Mr. Casey:

Application is hereby made by the City of Chicago’s Department of Transportation (CDOT) at 2 N. LaSalle St., Suite 820, Chicago, IL 60602 as the owner of the bridge located at 829 W. Division Street for a federal consistency review with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources Coastal Management Program, of the location and plans for a fixed span thrust arch bridge to be constructed in place of the existing temporary bridge across the North Branch Canal of the Chicago River.

Project Location North Branch Canal of the Chicago River, 2.99 miles from the west end of the Chicago Lock in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois

Latitude: 41°-53’-18’’ N Longitude: 87°-36’-28” W

See Attachment 1 for project vicinity and location maps.

Project Description The original bridge structure was a moveable bascule bridge that was in serious condition and was replaced in 2014 with a temporary bridge, which now needs to be replaced since the bridge was only designed for temporary use. The proposed improvements now include the replacement of the existing temporary bridge with a fixed span bridge. The proposed bridge over the North Branch Canal is a thrust arch structure. Work on the roadway approaches to the new bridge structure will include resurfacing and reconstruction, sidewalk reconstruction and curb and gutter replacement.

In order to minimize the impacts on traffic along Division Street during construction, a temporary bridge and a runaround will be installed to the north of the existing structure. Temporary piers will be located within the waterway while maintaining the existing clear channel width. Barge mounted equipment will be required for the construction and removal of the existing structure.

The proposed activity complies with Illinois’ approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such policies.

The bridge construction is expected to start in Q2 of 2022 and complete in Q2 of 2024. City of Chicago funds will be used for this project.

United States Coast Guard permit application review is ongoing. For your convenience, we have enclosed USCG Bridge Permit Application package, see Attachment 2.

The attached application and supporting documentation are provided for your review. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact the Project Manager, Soliman Khudeira at (312) 744-9605.

Sincerely,

Soliman Khudeira, Ph.D., P.E., S.E. Section Chief – Major Projects CDOT – Division of Engineering

Enclosures cc: Burke, Khudeira, WSP, Lochner ATTACHMENT #1

VICINITY AND LOCATION MAP EXISTING AND PROPOSED DIVISION STREET BRIDGE OVER NORTH BRANCH CANAL MILEPOINT 2.99

016-6209

Date of Signature: 2/10/2021 License Expiration Date: 11/30/2022 02/10/2021 SHEET 1 OF 6 H.W. LOCHNER ATTACHMENT #2

COAST GUARD BRIDGE PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE Bridge Permit Application

Reconstruction of the Division Street Bridge Over the North Branch Canal of the Chicago River At Mile 2.99 (4.81 km) from Chicago Lock Existing Structure No. 016-6015 Existing Temporary Bridge Proposed Structure No. 016-6209 CDOT Project No. E-1-022 December 17, 2020

Commander (obr) Ninth Coast Guard District 1240 East Ninth Street, Room 2047 Cleveland, Ohio 44199-2060

Subject: Bridge Permit Application Reconstruction of the Division Street Bascule Bridge over the North Branch Canal at Mile 2.99 from Lake Michigan Existing Structure No. 016-6015 Existing Temporary Bridge (Permit 5-14-9 & 5a-14-9) Proposed Structure No. 016-6209 CDOT Project No. E-1-022

Attention: Mr. Blair Stanifer Chief, Bridge Branch

Dear Mr. Stanifer:

Application is hereby made by the City of Chicago’s Department of Transportation (CDOT) at 2 N. LaSalle St., Suite 820, Chicago, IL 60602 as the owner of the bridge located at 829 W. Division Street for approval by the Commandant, United States Coast Guard, of the location and plans for a fixed span thrust arch bridge to be constructed in place of the existing temporary bridge across the North Branch Canal of the Chicago River, 2.99 miles from the west end of the Chicago Lock (41°-53’-18’’ N, 87°-36’-28” W) in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois.

The elevation of the canal and river surface at the bridge sites is controlled by a system of locks operated by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The North Branch Canal has not been used by major commercial vessels since the early 1980s and the existing bascule bridge has not required opening for maritime use in more than thirty years. The Halsted Street bascule bridge, located immediately to the south, was removed and replaced with a new tied arch structure. The current vertical clearance of the Halsted structure is 12.38’ above the Low Water Datum which will dictate the minimum vertical clearance of all upstream structures on the North Branch Canal. In order to minimize the impacts on traffic along Division Street during construction, a temporary bridge and a runaround will be installed to the north of the existing structure. Temporary piers will be located within the waterway while maintaining the existing clear channel width. Barge mounted equipment will be required for the construction and removal of the existing structure.

Protected Species The IDNR provided a Consultation Closure Letter for the project on July 17, 2018.

The proposed project does not appear to have an impact on federally threatened or endangered species, which is documented in the enclosed Section 7 Evaluation.

Other Agency Coordination Section 106 sign-off was given for the removal of the bascule bridge and a Memorandum of Agreement among the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and the Illinois State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) was agreed upon in May 2014 (see Enclosure #3).

City of Chicago funds will be used for this project.

Federal Agencies which must grant approvals, easements, or other actions for this project include: · Federal Highway Administration – The initial meeting was held on February 7, 2011. The project is classified as a Group II Categorical Exclusion. The Project Development Report was submitted to the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) for their review and approval by IDOT and FHWA. · US Army Corps of Engineers – A Joint Permit Application Form was submitted on October 19, 2020.

The bridge will have no significant effect on the human environment. A Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment describing these effects has been prepared (see Enclosure #3).

There are no publicly owned lands from a park, recreational area, or wildlife or waterfowl refuge, or any land from a historic (including archaeological) site, in the way of the fixed span arch bridge, in either the vicinity or the approaches of the structure.

For your convenience, we have enclosed all previous correspondences with the Coast Guard along with permit for the temporary bridge placement (see Enclosure #5).

The project will not result in displacement or relocations of residences or businesses and will not affect minority or low-income populations under the Environmental Justice requirements.

Sincerely,

Soliman Khudeira, Ph.D., P.E., S.E. Section Chief – Major Projects CDOT – Division of Engineering

Enclosures cc: Burke, Khudeira, WSP, Lochner ENCLOSURE #1

BRIDGE PERMIT APPLICATION Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

Dear Sir:

Application is hereby made for a Coast Guard bridge permit.

A. ADMINISTRATIVE AND NAVIGATION INFORMATION

1. Application Date: 12/17/2020

a. Applicant information: Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT)

1) Name: Soliman Khudeira, PhD, PE, SE, Section Chief - Major Projects

2) Address: 2 N. LaSalle St., Suite 820, Chicago, IL. 60602

3) Telephone number: (312) 744-9605

4) Email address: [email protected]

b. Consultant/Agent information (if employed): Krashan Singhal, PE

1) Name (company or individual): WSP USA

2) Address: 30 N. LaSalle St., Suite 4200, Chicago, IL. 60602

3) Telephone number: (312) 803-6504

4) Email address: [email protected]

5) Letter authorizing a consultant/agent to obtain permits on behalf of the applicant included: Yes No

c. Name of Proposed Bridge(s): Division Street Bridge

1) Name of the waterway that the bridge(s) would cross: North Branch Canal of the Chicago River at Mile 2.99

2) Number of miles above the mouth of the waterway where the bridge(s) would be located and provide latitude and longitude coordinates (degree/minute/second) at centerline of navigation channel (contact the local Coast Guard Bridge Office for guidance): Bridge structure located at Mile 2.99 from the west end of the Chicago Lock over the North Branch Canal. The centerline of the navigation channel at the proposed bridge location is at the following Latitude and Longitude, respectively:

41.903491 N, 87.649312W.

3) City or town, county/parish, and state where the bridge(s) would be located at, near, or between: City of Chicago, Cook County, Illinois

4) Brief description of project to include type of bridge(s) proposed [fixed or 1 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

movable (drawbridge, bascule, vertical lift, swing span, pontoon), highway, railway, pedestrian, pipeline] and existing bridge(s) at project site, if applicable: The original bridge structure was a moveable bascule bridge that was in poor condition and was functionally obsolete. In 2014, a Special Inspection was conducted and the Bridge Condition Report (BCR) found that the original bascule bridge structure (IDOT Structure No. 016-6015) was in critical condition. Due to the safety concerns, the original bascule bridge was replaced in 2014 with a temporary bridge, which now needs to be replaced since the bridge was only designed for temporary use. The proposed improvements include the replacement of the existing temporary bridge with a fixed span bridge. The proposed bridge over the North Branch Canal is a thrust arch structure.

5) Drawbridge Regulations (if applicable): Not Applicable (N/A)

6) Date of plans and number of plan sheets: 11/16/2020 (698 sheets)

7) Estimated cost of bridge(s) and approaches:

a) Provide the estimated cost of the bridge(s) as proposed, with vertical and horizontal navigational clearances: $23.4M (Canal Bridge)

b) Provide the estimated cost of a low-level bridge(s) on the same alignment with only sufficient clearance to pass high water while meeting the intended purpose and need: The current design reflects the low-level design alternative that barely meets the USCG vertical clearance requirement: $23.4M (Canal Bridge)

8) Type and source of project funding (federal, state, private, etc.): City of Chicago Funds

9) Proposed project timeline:

i. Design: ongoing, targeted completion in June, 2021.

ii. Construction anticipated start in Q3 of 2021, complete in Q3 of 2023.

10) Other Federal actions (e.g., permits, approvals, funding, etc.) associated with the proposal: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit

d. Legal authority for proposed action:

1) Cite appropriate Bridge Act: General Bridge Act of 1946

2) If not the owner of the existing bridge(s) that is being replaced or modified, include a signed statement from the bridge owner authorizing the removal or modification work and cite its location: Cover letter from owner of structure is attached.

3) For privately owned bridges, cite authorization for right to build (e.g. deed or

2 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

easement from the property owner authorizing the proposed construction or modification work): N/A e. International bridges (if applicable): The Division Street Bridge over the North Branch Canal is not an international bridge.

1) Cite the International Bridge Act of 1972, or a copy of the Special Act of Congress if constructed prior to 1972, as the legislative authority for international bridge construction: N/A

2) For permits issued under the International Bridge Act of 1972, cite Presidential approval, via the State Department, included with the application as required: N/A f. Dimensions of the proposed bridge(s): See bridge plan sheets included in Enclosure 2 for additional details.

1) Vertical clearance as indicated on plan sheets: 16’-0” from Design Low Water Elevation -1.98 CCD to Low Point of Steel Floorbeam.

Per U.S. Coast Pilot Chapter 11 Paragraph 560 Ver. 1.0 Chicago City Datum is 1.38’ above Low Water Datum at the Chicago Lock at the mouth of the Chicago River at Lake Michigan. Low Water Datum equals EL. 577.50 (IGLD 1985). Immediately to the south of the Division Street Canal Bridge, the proposed Halsted Street Canal Bridge has a proposed vertical clearance of 12.38’ from Low Water Datum.

2) Horizontal clearance as indicated on plan sheets: 80’-0” normal to channel axis between face of proposed river pier foundations and proposed fender/dolphin protections

3) Length of bridge(s) project: 200’-4” ft bridge length measured back-to-back of bridge abutments

If no prior permit exists, and this is a modification or replacement project, is the length the same as the old bridge: Existing bridge: 260'-0" measured from C/L to C/L of abutments.

If not, what is the difference: The difference in bridge length is 59'-8".

4) Width of bridge(s) project: 82’-6” bridge deck width

If no prior permit exists, and this is a modification or replacement project, is the width the same as the old bridge: Existing bridge: 54'-4"

If not, what is the difference: The difference in bridge width is 28'-2"

5) Depth of the waterway at project site at MHW if tidal or OHW if non-tidal, using the appropriate elevation and datum (e.g., NGVD 1929, NAVD 1988, etc.): The maximum depth of the waterway in the canal channel is 12.02’ measured from the Design Low Water Elevation of -1.98 to the streambed elevation,

3 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

-14.0.

6) Width of waterway at project site at MHW if tidal or OHW if non-tidal: approximately 125’ at LWD IGLD85, measured normal to the axis of the channel.

7) Significant effect on flood heights and associated drift, if any, that could cause a navigation hazard: N/A

g. Temporary Bridge(s) dimensions (vertical clearance, horizontal clearance, length and width), if applicable: Temporary Run Around

Vertical Clearances: 18’-3” from Low Water Datum to Low Point of Steel

Horizontal Clearances: Over 80’ normal to channel axis between piers.

Length: 409’-7 3/8” measured along PGL

Width: Maximum 49’-10”

h. Enclosed are the waterway data requirements as determined by the Coast Guard District Bridge Office. If a navigation impact report was conducted please cite location(s) in the case file, list title and date of document as appropriate: N/A

i. Existing bridge(s) if applicable: Temporary Acrow Bridge

1) Name of bridge(s): Temporary Division Street Bridge

2) Type of bridge(s) and number of lanes (e.g., fixed or moveable (drawbridge, bascule, vertical lift, swing span, pontoon, etc.); highway, railway, pedestrian, pipeline): Fixed span truss bridge with one 12’-0” lane and one 6’-0” bike lane on each direction, and a 5’-0” sidewalk on each side of the structure

3) For movable spans identify the existing drawbridge operating regulation governing the structure (e.g. 33 CFR 117.XXX, if applicable): N/A

When applicable, identify if the local Coast Guard Bridge Office identified that modification of an existing drawbridge requires revision or removal of the existing regulation (e.g. if the bridge project involves replacing the existing drawbridge with a fixed bridge):

NOTE: If the waterway is not already identified in 117 Subpart B, please note if an operating schedule other than open on demand is being considered.

4) Latitude and longitude coordinates (degree/minute/second) at centerline of the bridge(s): 41.903491 N, 87.649312W

5) Dimensions of the existing bridge(s):

a) Vertical clearance(s) as indicated on previous plan sheets (include both the open and closed-to-navigation clearances for movable spans). [The proposed 4 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

and existing vertical clearances must be compared using the same datums. This may require surveying the existing bridge]: 17’-5” from Low Water Datum to Low Point of Steel

b) Horizontal clearance as indicated on previous plan sheets: Over 80’ normal to channel axis between piers.

c) Length of existing bridge(s): 261’-0” ft bridge length measured back-to- back of bridge abutments

d) Width of existing bridge(s): 54’-4”

6) Owner of the existing bridge(s): CDOT j. Discuss construction methodology, if known, and removal of existing bridge(s), as applicable:

1) Discuss proposed construction methodology and restrictions: The proposed bridge will be constructed while the Division St. land traffic is rerouted through the temporary run-around of which the centerline is 70' offset to the North from the existing Street centerline. Temporary cofferdams are required for the construction of bridge foundation. Barge mounted crane will be required for the bridge arch and superstructure floor system erection. Two temporary bents will be constructed in the waterway to support the temporary bridges. Horizontal and vertical clearance of the waterway will be maintained to meet the existing condition.

2) Discuss maintenance of land traffic during construction activities: A temporary run-around of which the centerline is 70' offset to the North from the existing Street centerline will be constructed prior to the proposed bridge construction. One lane of EB and one lane of WB will be maintained to support the run-around land traffic during proposed bridge construction. North sidewalk will be maintained on the temporary bridge.

3) Discuss extent of removal of existing bridge(s) (e.g. in its entirety, two feet below the mud line, down to or below the natural bottom of the waterway or to a specific elevation), time needed for removal, etc.: Top of the existing river piers and anchor piers of historic bascule bridge will be partially removed to provide adequate space for the installation of 6' deep proposed drilled shaft cap. The new drilled shafts will be installed in between the river pier and anchor pier. The bulk of the historic pier foundations will remain in place.

4) Discuss demolition methodology: Top of the existing river piers and anchor piers of historic bascule bridge will be partially removed in dry condition. Cofferdam is required for the installation of backfill materials under the wider proposed drilled shaft cap. k. Other agencies with jurisdiction over the proposed project:

1) Agency: USACE, IDNR-OWR, IDNR-ICMP, IDOT, IEPA, USFWS

5 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

2) Permits or type of approvals required for the project:

USACE – Section 10, Section 404 and 408 authorization, IDNR-OWR permit, IEPA – Water Quality Certification, IDOT clearance, USFWS – Section 7 Consultation, CDOT Harbor Permit

6 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

B. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION:

1. National Environmental Policy Act

Lead Federal Agency: FHWA

List Cooperating Agencies for project: FHWA, IDOT, CDOT

a. Type of environmental document.

Environmental Impact Statement/Record of Decision (EIS/ROD)

Cite location(s) in the application package:

Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact (EA/FONSI)

Cite location(s) in the application package:

Categorical Exclusion (CE)

Cite location(s) in the application package: The proposed river crossing improvement meets the requirements of a Categorical Exclusion, Group II, as determined by the Federal Highway Administration in accordance with the NEPA process. Since no significant impacts to environmental, socioeconomic, cultural, or biological features were identified, the preparation of an Environmental Assessment, FONSI Statement, or Environmental Impact Statement was not required. A Project Development Report meeting the guidelines of a CE II was prepared and includes a summary of the environmental investigation. Copies of the environmental, cultural and biological sign-offs are attached.

b. Has the environmental document been modified, reevaluated, supplemented or rescinded for the proposed action?

Yes No

If yes, cite location(s) in the application package:

2. Environmental Effects Abroad

a. Does the proposed project involve a bridge connection to Canada or Mexico?

Yes No

If yes, cite location(s) in NEPA document where environmental effects abroad are described:

3. Clean Water Act

a. Has a Water Quality Certification (WQC), waiver or statement that the WQC is not required been obtained from the appropriate federal, interstate, or state agency?

7 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

Yes No

If yes, cite location(s) in the application package: Consistent with IDOT and FHWA requirements, a section 404 Joint Application (NCR Form 426) has been submitted to IDNR-OWR and USACOA (See Enclosure #5). A Water Quality Certificate has been requested from IEPA as a part of that same application form. (See Enclosure #5).

NOTE: The USCG will not accept an application package as complete if a WQC, waiver, or statement from the appropriate regulatory body has not been obtained.

b. Name of the Federal, State or Tribal certifying agency and point of contact with phone and email address, if available:

c. If the WQC is granted under a Programmatic Agreement (e.g., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Nationwide Permit (NWP) include the date of the NWP, the type of NWP (14, 15, etc.) and the NWP number and title:

d. For permit amendment actions, include a new WQC or a written confirmation from the certifying agency that the existing WQC has been reissued/renewed or is still valid for the proposed action.

New WQC Attached

Written Confirmation of WQC validity attached

4. Wetlands

a. Is the proposed project located in or adjacent to a wetland?

Yes No

b. If yes, what is the acreage of wetlands that will be permanently and temporarily impacted by the proposed project?

Include USACE permit (nationwide authorization or individual), if required, and cite where wetland mitigation measures are described in the application package: The project is not located in or adjacent to a regulatory wetland. A wetland delineation report has been included in Enclosure 3 of this application package.

5. Coastal Zone Management Act - The Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) of 1972 (16 U.S.C. § 1451), as amended, and its implementing regulations (15 CFR Part 930), requires all projects located within the designated coastal zone of a state to be consistent with the State's federally approved CZM plan (CZMP).

a. Is the project located in a state that has an approved Coastal Zone Management Act Plan (CZMP)?

Yes No

b. If yes, is the project within an area included in the federally approved CZMP? 8 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

Yes No

c. If yes, has the State specifically excluded this activity from its federally approved CZMP?

Yes No

Include State CZM concurrence/with consistency certification and cite location(s) in the application package: There is no applicable Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Plan for this project.

6. Floodplains

a. Is the proposed project located in the base floodplain? An encroachment into the base floodplain does not exist when only the piers, pilings, or pile bents are located in the floodplain.

Yes No

b. Is there a significant encroachment (constituting a considerable probability of loss of human life; likely future damage associated with the encroachment that could be substantial in cost or extent; or a notable adverse impact on natural and beneficial floodplain values) into the floodplain?

Yes No

c. If yes, provide documentation and cite location(s) in the application package: The project is not located in a base floodplain. The water surface elevation of the North Branch Canal is regulated by the Chicago River controlling works and locks in the Chicago Harbor at Lake Michigan. When the water elevation reaches +3.5 (Chicago City Datum) at this facility, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District opens the locks and starts relieving the waterways to Lake Michigan. No overbank flow has been documented in recent history.

7. Wild and Scenic Rivers

a. Is the river involved in the proposed bridge project a designated Wild and Scenic River?

Yes No

The canal is not on the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System or listed in the Nationwide Inventory of Rivers with potential for inclusion on the system.

b. If yes, attach correspondence with the river-administering agency and cite location(s) in the application package:

8. Coastal Barrier Resources Act

a. Does the proposed project connect to a unit of the Coastal Barrier Resources System? 9 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

Yes No

b. If yes, and the project is federally funded, cite location of Section 6 exception in the application package and any correspondence with the FWS:

9. Land and Water Conservation Fund Act

a. Does the proposed project involve a conversion of land or facilities funded under Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act?

Yes No

b. If yes, include correspondence with the NPS and authorization from the Secretary of the Interior for that conversion and cite location(s) in the application package:

10. National Marine Sanctuaries Act

a. Is the proposed project in or adjacent to a National Marine Sanctuary?

Yes No

b. Is the proposed bridge(s) likely to destroy, cause loss of, or injure a resource of a National Marine Sanctuary? (If no, provide evidence)

Yes No

c. If yes, include evidence of consultation with Office of National Marine Sanctuaries and the agency’s findings/conditions and cite location(s) in the application package:

11. Marine Protected Areas

a. Is the proposed project in or adjacent to a Marine Protected Area (MPA) as defined in section 4(d) of Executive Order 13158?

Yes No

b. If yes, will the proposed project affect the natural or cultural resources that are protected by the MPA? (If no, provide evidence)

Yes No

c. If yes, include evidence of correspondence with MPA Center, if applicable, and cite location(s) in the application package:

12. Endangered Species Act

a. Are there federally designated threatened or endangered species and/or critical habitat in the area that the proposed project is located? (If no, provide evidence)

Yes No

10 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

No threatened or endangered species are known to be present in the project area as indicated by the Biological Approval received on the attached Environmental Survey Request form.

b. May the proposed project affect federally designated threatened or endangered species and/or critical habitat? (If no, provide evidence)

Yes No

c. If yes, was there formal or informal consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)?

Formal consultation

Informal consultation

d. If formal, provide date(s) and attach biological assessment, biological opinion, and any other relevant correspondence and cite location(s) in application package:

e. If informal, provide dates and include correspondence or documented phone conversations with and from USFWS/NMFS and cite location(s) in the application package:

f. Include Biological Assessment/Biological Evaluation, as appropriate.

13. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act

a. Include any correspondence with USFWS and the relevant state wildlife agency regarding Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act coordination and cite location(s) in the application package: See IDOT Biological Clearance information in Enclosure 3.

14. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act

a. Will the proposed project likely adversely affect designated Essential Fish Habitats (EFH) as defined in the Magnuson-Stevens Act? (If no, provide evidence)

Yes No

b. Identify location of EFH assessment and relevant correspondence with NMFS in the application package:

15. Marine Mammal Protection Act

a. Does the proposed project involve a “take” of marine mammals as defined in the Marine Mammal Protection Act?

Yes No

b. If yes, include the incidental harassment authorization or letter of authorization from NMFS and any relevant correspondence and cite location(s) in the application package:

11 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

16. Migratory Bird Treaty Act

a. Does the proposed project involve a potential take of migratory birds as defined in the Migratory Bird Treaty Act? (If no, provide evidence)

Yes No

See IDOT Biological Clearance information in Enclosure 3.

b. If yes, is a permit required?

Yes No

c. If a permit is required, include it and any correspondence with USFWS and cite location(s) in the application package:

17. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act

a. May the proposed project take or disturb bald or golden eagles (including nests) as defined in the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act? (If no, provide evidence)

Yes No

b. If yes, is a permit required?

Yes No

c. If a permit is required, include it and any correspondence with USFWS and cite location(s) in the application package.

18. Invasive Species

a. Does the proposed project have potential to introduce or foster the spread of invasive species?

Yes No

b. If yes, cite the document that describes measures that will be taken to minimize this risk and location(s) in the application package:

19. Section 106

a. Does the proposed project have potential to impact properties (including submerged abandoned shipwrecks) listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places?

Yes No

b. If yes, provide evidence of consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, if applicable) and cite location (s) in the application package. Include: See Enclosure 3 for documentation of

12 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

correspondence with IL SHPO, including determination.

Copies of the correspondence

Memorandum of Agreement

No effect determination

c. For projects involving Federal lands only provide:

Archeological clearances

Archeological reports

20. Clean Air Act

a. Does the proposed project occur in an area of nonattainment or maintenance for any criteria pollutant?

Yes No

b. If project occurs in a nonattainment or maintenance area, do the transportation or general conformity regulations, or both, apply?

General Transportation

c. Is the project exempt from a transportation conformity analysis for any of the reasons listed in 40 CFR § 93.126? Which reason?

Yes No Reason:

d. Is the project exempt from a general conformity analysis for any of the reasons listed in 40 CFR § 93.153(c)? N/A

Yes No

e. If general conformity applies, is the project listed in a conforming State Implementation Plan (SIP)? N/A

Yes No

f. If a general conformity determination was prepared, include the draft and final determinations and any relevant correspondence and cite their location(s) in the application package: N/A

g. If transportation conformity applies, is the project listed in a conforming SIP, Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Federal Implementation Plan (FIP)?

Yes No

13 Coast Guard Bridge Permit Application for Proposed SN 016-6209

h. If yes, cite location of information regarding listing in the application package: This project is included in the 2007-2012 (transportation plan) and in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), endorsed by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP), the region’s Metropolitan Planning Organization. The CMAP (transportation plan) was found to conform by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) on October 20, 2003. The TIP was found to conform by FHWA and by FTA on October 20, 2003.

i. If transportation conformity applies, does the project contribute to any new localized CO, PM10, or PM2.5 violations or increase the frequency or severity or any existing violations of the same?

Yes No

j. If yes, cite location of information in the application package:

21. Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority or Low-Income Populations

a. Does the proposed project involve disproportionate adverse impacts to minority and/or low-income populations as defined in Executive Order 12898?

Yes No

Note: The proposed bridge replaces an existing bridge at the same location.

b. If yes, include the analysis describing the impacts and cite location(s) in the application package:

c. If yes, cite the location in the application package that describes measures to be taken to reduce those impacts:

22. Hazardous Materials, Substances or Wastes

a. Does the proposed project involve or is it located near a Superfund site or any site regulated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) or State law regulating hazardous materials, substances or wastes?

Yes No

b. If yes, cite the location(s) in the NEPA document where hazardous materials, substances or wastes are discussed:

14 ENCLOSURE #2

Exhibits

o Vicinity Map & Location Map o Adjoining Information Related to Adjoining Properties o Proposed Roadway Plan & Profile o Proposed Bridge General Plan & Elevations and Temporary Runaround Exhibit o Existing Bridge General Plan & Elevations and Temporary Bridge Plan & Elevation o Existing Aerial View Exhibit and Existing Site Photos

VICINITY MAP & LOCATION MAP

Project Location

DIVISION STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1

West Project Limits East Project Limits

Structure: Structure: Exist. SN. 016-6016 Orig. SN. 016-6015 (removed) Prop. SN. 016-6210 Exist. Temporary Bridge Division Street over the Prop. SN. 016-6209 Chicago River Division Street over the North Branch Canal

DIVISION CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT 2 EXISTING AND PROPOSED DIVISION STREET BRIDGE OVER NORTH BRANCH CANAL MILEPOINT 2.99

016-6209

Date of Signature: 2/10/2021 License Expiration Date: 11/30/2022 02/10/2021 SHEET 1 OF 6 H.W. LOCHNER

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO

THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES

Division Canal Bridge Additional Information Related to the Adjoining Properties

PIN Address Business/Property Add’l Address Phone Number website Name Shown by Assessor 17-05-405-001-0000 1168 N. Halsted St. West Marine (312) 255-1464 https://www.westmarine.com/st 60642 ores/chicago-il-1305 17-05-205-024-0000 754 W Division St. Waste Management 1500 N. Hooker St. (708) 222-5024 www.wastemanagementchicag 60642 Inc o.com 17-05-404-001-0000 1111 N. Hooker St. FedEx (312) 944-8427 www.fedex.com 60642 17-05-205-029-0000 870 W. Division St. Bristol Design Group 0 N. Hooker St. (312) 266-2341 http://bristolcabinetry.com/ 60642 Inc 17-05-201-009-0000 870 W. Division St. Wizard Werks 0 N. Hooker St. (312) 291-9449 http://www.wizardwerkschi.co 60642 m/ 17-05-201-009-0000 870 W. Division St. Stuart Dean 0 N. Hooker St. (312) 787-1800 http://www.stuartdean.com/de 60642 fault.asp 17-05-201-009-0000 870 W. Division St. IAC Properties 0 N. Hooker St. https://iacproperties.com/ 60642 1849 Green Bay Rd 4 Floor Highland Park, IL 60035 17-052-230-040-000 900 W. Division St. Gold Coast Auto 900 N. Hooker St. (312) 787-0333 http://www.goldcoastautobody 60642 Body .com/ 17-05-403-002-0000 901 W. Division St. CTA Material 888-968-7282 www.transitchicago.com 60642 Distribution 17-05-223-003-0000 930 W. Division St. Enterprise 1201 N. Hickory Ave. (312) 475-2000 www.enterprise.com

60642 17-05-205-026-0000 1460 N. Hooker St. Waste Management (708) 222-5024 www.wastemanagementchicag 60642 Inc o.com 17-05-224-005-0000 1200 N. Kingsbury Action Electric Sales (773) 539-1800 https://www.basicwire.com/ St. 60642 3900 N Rockwell St Chicago, IL 60618 17-05-225-019-0000 1210 N. Halsted St. Mon Ami Gas Inc. (312) 664-6512 www.mobil.com 60642

ROADWAY PLANS & PROFILE 5 : 0 6 : 2 4 P M M O D E L : D e s ig n F IL E N A M E : p w : \ \ V S S L C - P W IN T . h w lo c h n e r . c o m : L o c h n e r - S L C \ D o c u m e n t s \ P r o je c t s \ 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 2 4 \ 0 3 _ C A D D \ 0 1 _ S h e e t s \ R o a d w a y & L a n d s c a p e A r c h it e c t u r a l\ 8 7 8 2 2 - S H T - H W L - R D Y- E X IS T & P R O P P L A N S - 0 0 5 . d g n LOCHNER 12 THFLOOR H. W.LOCHNER,INC. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS60606 225 WESTWASHINGTONSTREET PLOT DATE: PLOT SCALE: USER NAME:

12/11/2020 $USER N

M A T C H L IN E S T A 3 2 + 0 0 EX ROW PR ROW TEMP EASEMENT DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 15.11 15.14 15.07 14.63 14.80 TEMP EASEMENT SLABLIMIT SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 8/28/2020 DMB JS JS APPROACH 17.01 16.57 17.12 16.83 16.52 + 5 0 . 5 6 16.63

EX ROW REVISED: REVISED: REVISED: REVISED:

O W

18.35

O W CHICAGO DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION DIVISION OFENGINEERING 19.93 ¡ W.DIVISIONST. NORTH BRANCH ¡ W.DIVISIONST. 20.83 EXISTING CONDITIONS CANAL SCALE: 1" =20' 20.28 DIVISION STREETROADWAYIMPROVEMENT EXISTING &PROPOSEDPLANS-11 SHEET 71 OF 35+00 241 EX ROW 18.83

TEMP EASEMENT

SHEETS

R X

STA. O

W O W 32+00.00 17.04 17.14 17.31 17.41 TO STA. 16.89 17.04 + 5 9 7 0 17.18' . TEMP EASEMENT SIDEWALK SLAB LIMIT APPROACH 36+00.00 SIDEWALK EX ROW PR ROW 15.36 15.12 15.21 15.03 14.74 14.78 F.A. RTE. FA P. 87822 01-E1022-BR &01-E1023-BR

12/15/2020 M A T C H L IN E S T A 3 6 + 0 0 SECTION CONTRACT NO. ILLINOIS EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND: FED. AIDPROJECT XX.XX XX.XX XX.XX

0 COUNTY SCALE INFEET COOK E-1-022 &023 VEGETATION REMOVAL GROUND ELEVATION PAVEMENT OR FLOWLINE ELEVATION TOP OFCURBELEVATION REMOVAL CURB &GUTTER REMOVAL MEDIAN REMOVAL PAVEMENT DRIVEWAY REMOVAL PAVEMENT REMOVAL HMA SURFACE REMOVAL SIDEWALK M 6000(155&154) SHEETS TOTAL

20 698 SHEET 101 NO.

40 C - 71

60 5 : 0 8 : 0 8 P M M O D E L : D e s ig n F IL E N A M E : p w : \ \ V S S L C - P W IN T . h w lo c h n e r . c o m : L o c h n e r - S L C \ D o c u m e n t s \ P r o je c t s \ 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 2 4 \ 0 3 _ C A D D \ 0 1 _ S h e e t s \ R o a d w a y & L a n d s c a p e A r c h it e c t u r a l\ 8 7 8 2 2 - S H T - H W L - R D Y- E X IS T & P R O P P L A N S - 0 0 6 . d g n LOCHNER 12 THFLOOR H. W.LOCHNER,INC. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS60606 225 WESTWASHINGTONSTREET PLOT DATE: PLOT SCALE: USER NAME:

12/11/2020 $USER N

MODIFICATION OF 1111 NORTH HOOKER ST., CHICAGO (021TE)

M A T C H L IN E S T A 3 2 + 0 0 TEMP EASEMENT DATE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: EX ROW PR ROW

14.75' EASEMENT TEMP

14.53' 14.11'

14.80'

14.70' 14.20'

14.64'

6 6 0 0 1.50% . '

8/28/2020 DMB JS JS 7 2 . 0 0 '

6 5 0 2 7 5 0 2 7 5 0 7 5 0 1.50% RIM 15.65 .

15.57'

15.57' 16.07'

16.07' . ' . TC 16.15 ' . ' '

+52.74

16.19' RIM 15.71 WALK SIDE- TC 16.21

+55.00 SIDEWALK

1.50% + 6 1 . 8 3 B E G IN S ID E W A L K T R A N S IT IO N

16.12'

16.18' + 7 1 8 3 REVISED: REVISED: REVISED: REVISED: . E N D S ID E W A L K T R A N S IT IO N EX ROW

B E G IN P A V E M E N T C O N N E C T O R

+ 7 6 8 3

. E

E N D P A V E M E N T C O N N E C T O R X

B E G IN A P P R O A C H S L A B O W

1.50%

+ 0 6 . 8 3

E N D A P P R O A CE H S L A B X

1/4" DIAMOND GRINDING (BRIDGE SECTION) LIMITS - PER IDOT GBSP 59

R NORTH BRANCH

MODIFICATION OF 1460 NORTH HOOKER ST., CHICAGO (023TE) O W CHICAGO DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION CANAL DIVISION OFENGINEERING ¡ W.DIVISIONST. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SCALE: 1" =20' DIVISION STREETROADWAYIMPROVEMENT BRIDGE LIMIT

1/4" DIAMOND GRINDING (BRIDGE SECTION) LIMITS -

PER IDOT GBSP 59 MODIFICATION OF 1160 N. 1160 OF MODIFICATION

EXISTING &PROPOSEDPLANS-12 HALSTED ST., CHICAGO ST., HALSTED SHEET

PR COMB CONC C&G TY B-V.12 72

OF (025TE) 35+00 241 EX ROW

SHEETS

NORTH KINGSBURY ST., KINGSBURY NORTH

MODIFICATION OF 1200 OF MODIFICATION

15.90'

16.40'

STA. R

O (024TE) CHICAGO W

16.50'

32+00.00

R SLAB LIMIT APPROACH

O W

16.45' TO STA.

16.40' 15.90' +

LIMIT CONNECTOR PAVEMENT 5 5 0 0 16.51' + 5 7 . 3 7 .

TC 16.26' RIM 15.76'

+55.00

TC 16.20' RIM 15.70'

+57.37 EX ROW PR ROW 36+00.00 EASEMENT TEMP 0.62% 2.77%

BEGIN 10' SIDEWALK TRANSITION

PR COMB CONC C&G TY B-V.12

BEGIN 10' SIDEWALK TRANSITION 6 6 . 0 0 ' F.A. RTE. 7 2 0 0 FA . ' P. 6 . 5 0 ' 2 7 . 5 0 ' 2 7 . 5 0 ' 7 . 5 0 ' 12/15/2020 87822 01-E1022-BR &01-E1023-BR M A T C H L IN E S T A 3 6 + 0 0 SECTION PROPOSED CONDITIONS LEGEND: CONTRACT NO. ILLINOIS XX.XX XX.XX XX.XX FED. AIDPROJECT GROUND ELEVATION PAVEMENT OR FLOWLINE ELEVATION TOP OFCURBELEVATION PAVEMENT FULL DEPTHHMA CLASS CPATCH MEDIAN HES BUSPAD HES PCCDRIVEWAY PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT RESURFACING PCC SIDEWALK

0 COUNTY SCALE INFEET COOK E-1-022 &023 M 6000(155&154) SHEETS TOTAL

20 698 SHEET 102 NO.

40 C - 72

60 24 24 0 0 1 . 4 6 . 0 0 2 +

4 N 3

O .

22 I 22 A T T A

S 12/15/2020 V EXISTING ¡ PROFILE

I E P L V E 0 0 0 0 % -2 .75 .75 20 +2 % 20 + + 6 2 3 3

A A T T S 18 S 18

E E N N I I 6 6 L L 6 6

. PROPOSED ¡ PROFILE . H H 7 7 1 1 C 16 C 16

. . T T L L E E A A

0 0 M M 0 0 . . 6 6 0 0

14 + + 14 n g d .

2 SSD = 221' 0

0 12 12

- ex = -1.38' S E

L K = 36 I F

O 200.00' V.C. R P

O 10 10 R P

1 5 7 2 5 0 3 0 3 3 8 7 3 2 4 5 3 7 T

S 1 7 5 1 3 5 9 6 8 0 2 7 8 8 0 4 0 0 I

...... X

5 4 6 6 8 7 9 8 0 9 0 8 8 7 7 6 5 5

E - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Y D R

- 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 34+00 34+50 35+00 35+50 36+00 L W H - T H S - 2 2 8 7 8 \ l a r u t c e t i h c r

A ¡ N. HALSTED ST.

p STA. 37+94.49 a

c 20 20 s ex = 0.50' d

n K = 56 a L 150.00' V.C. &

y a w

d 18 18 a o R \ s 7 3 t 0 9 e . . e 4 1 h 0 0 1 1 S _

0 0 . . 1 L L

0 16 16 + + \ E E D

6 1 D 2 2 3 4 A 6 6 . . C

6 PROPOSED ¡ PROFILE 6 3 A A 3 8 0 \ + + T T 4 2 14 S S 14 6

7 0 E E 0 0 N N 0 I I 0 \ L L s t H H c e j 12 C -2 C 12 o .75 r % T T P

\ -0.10% s A -0.10% +0.15% A t 0 2 6 n 0 6 M M 8 e 0 . EXISTING ¡ PROFILE . . 0 2 1 m 1 . 1 1 u 1 5 c

+ 6 o N N 7

D 10 10 + \ O 3 O I 8 I C

. T L 3 T S

A A A - . r T V V A e S E E T n

L I L h S E c P

E I o V L P

: 8 8 V m o c . r e n h c o l

w 6 6 h . T N I W

3 7 9 1 1 8 1 9 4 2 6 7 6 1 7 9 7 4 9 7 2 7 5 5 P

- 0 0 3 7 2 6 8 0 7 9 7 8 8 9 8 9 9 1 0 2 9 8 2 3

...... C

L 5 5 3 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2

S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

S V \ \ : 36+00 36+50 37+00 37+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50 40+00 40+50 41+00 n w g i p F.A.P. TOTAL SHEET s USER NAME:$USER DESIGNED BY: JS REVISED: SECTION COUNTY : e RTE. SHEETS NO. M E LOCHNER DIVISION STREET ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT D P

M DRAWN BY: JS REVISED:

H. W. LOCHNER, INC. CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

: FA 01-E1022-BR & 01-E1023-BR COOK 698 115 A 8 L 225 WEST WASHINGTON STREET C-85 0 N EXISTING & PROPOSED PROFILES - 4 E PLOT SCALE: : CHECKED BY: DMB REVISED:

D DIVISION OF ENGINEERING 87822 CONTRACT NO.E-1-022 & 023 1 12 TH FLOOR E 1 L O : I CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2020 DATE: 8/28/2020 REVISED: SCALE: SHEET 85 OF 241 SHEETS STA.32+00.00 TO STA.41+00.00 ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT M 6000 (155 & 154) 5 M F

PROPOSED BRIDGE

GENERAL PLAN & ELEVATION,

SECTION AND TEMPORARY

RUNAROUND EXHIBIT

SN 016-6209 Division over the North Branch Canal 200.33' Bk. to Bk. of Abutments

Flotation Silt N Curtain, Typ. ¡ Fixed Brg. W. Abut. r ea Cl ¡ Fixed Brg. E. Abut. . p ' 2.17' o th 2.17' r d 0 P i ' W 0

0 l . .0 e

0 n 2 8 an h 2

F =

l o '

w 0

¡ North Existing R.O.W. 0 .

Branch Canal 1 1

Existing R.O.W. k l ' @ a

0 w s Waste Management 5 Vacant Lot . e e 7 d

10.28' n

754 W. Division i 1200 N. Kinsbury a S L

5.98' 10.74' B 414 W

2 k

90° l ' a

27° 0 Bk. W. Abut. t w u 5 . e

Sta. 33+05.83 O 7 d - i

Elev. 17.66 8.54' o S t -

33+00 34+00 t W. DIVISION ST. 35+00 u O '

' Bk. E. Abut. 0 0 n k 9.56' 0 5 .

Sta. 35+06.17 l a . '

¡ Exist. W. i 2 ¡ Prop. Bridge a 2 0 Elev. 17.66 d w 8 5

Division St. e e .

and PGL e n M 6 d i

a ' L S 0 0 ' . 0 1 0 1 . 415 860 2 2

Existing R.O.W. = k l

7.39' 12.12' 10.45' ' '

FEDEX a Phillips Towing 0 0 w 0 5 . .

1111 N. Hooker e 1168 N. Halsted 1 7 d Existing Steel and i 1

S Timber Fender System @ (to be removed), Typ. Existing R.O.W. s e n a

Existing Timber Dolphin L Existing R.O.W. PLAN (to be removed), Typ. B E

LEGEND 2

Temporary Cofferdam

NOTES: Permanent Sheet Piling 1. For datum information, see Sheet 3. Flotation Silt Curtain

Prop. Light Pole

Existing Structure CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION X.XX' Water Depth from Design Low DIVISION OF ENGINEERING Water Elevation DIVISION ST OVER THE NORTH BRANCH CANAL OF THE CHICAGO RIVER PROPOSED SN 016-6209 100 0 100 MILE POST 2.99 CITY OF CHICAGO, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

GENERAL PLAN SCALE IN FEET

03/30/2021 SHEET2 OF 6 H. W. LOCHNER 200.33' Bk. to Bk. of Abutments Back W. Abut. Back E. Abut.

12.08' 176.17' Thrust Arch 12.08'

Low Steel Elev. 14.02'

Exist./Prop. Grade, Typ. ' E ' E 0 F 0 C F

B 0 Elev. 3.50 0 . .

1.50% 1 1 6 F 6 F 1 1 CCD Elev. 0.00 A

Elev. 6.25 Temp. Cofferdam Bott. Cap Elev. -3.45 Canal Bott. Elev. -14± ¡ North Brach Canal 40.00'* 40.00'*

Temp. Cofferdam 80.00' Prop. Clear Channel Width*

135.83' Face-to-Face Dock Walls

* Measured perpendicular to ELEVATION ¡ North Branch Canal

WATER ELEVATION TABLE ELEVATION CONVERSION CHART

Loc. Elev. Description Description CCD NGVD29 IGLD 1985

A -1.98 Design Low Water CCD 0.00 579.48 578.65

B 3.80 Design High Water Design Low Water -1.98 577.50 576.67

C 3.87 100 Year Flood 100 Year Flood 3.87 583.35 582.52

Historical High Water 5.00 584.48 583.65

Ordinary High Water -0.83 578.65 577.82 MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE CCD = City of Chicago Datum 1 Low Point of Steel Floorbeam NGVD29 = National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 from 8.0' Lt. to 8.0' Rt. IGLD 1985 = International Great Lakes Datum of 1985 CITY OF CHICAGO Sta. 33+64.00, 16.00' Sta. 34+48.00, 16.00' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING

DIVISION ST OVER THE NORTH BRANCH CANAL OF THE CHICAGO RIVER PROPOSED SN 016-6209 100 0 100 MILE POST 2.99 CITY OF CHICAGO, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

BRIDGE ELEVATION SCALE IN FEET

03/30/2021 SHEET 3 OF 6 H. W. LOCHNER 82.50'

Out-Out 41.25' 41.25'

¡ Prop. Bridge ¡ Exist. Division St./ and PGL ¡ Exist. Bridge

2.00'

30.75' 30.75'

55.00'

Face to Face of Curb

27.50' 27.50'

2 WB Lanes at 11.00' = 22.00' 11'-0" Median Lane 2 EB Lanes at 11.00' = 22.00' y

5.50' 5.50' a l r . k e p c v g y

g e O n

n T D i

, d e

d e t b n

n t i

i r e e r

r r 7.50' Max. & Varies u 7.50' Max. & Varies r c G

G C c

n Transverse Steel '

n Sidewalk Sidewalk r o o t 0 o

e C

Box Beam, Typ.

t 5 C

. '

PGL r

' 0 ' o 9 .

A (3.75' Max. Depth) i 5

0 & Crown 1 p r . 7 5 y . . 0 2.0% P 1.5% Typ. ' 0 T 2.0% 3 . 0 p 8 y . T 6

Outside Outside Face of Face of Long. Concrete Stiffening Concrete Concrete Girder, Typ Fascia Fascia

Arch Rib Thrust Top of Multiuse Path Top of Foundation Block, Typ

SECTION THRU MAIN SPAN CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING

DIVISION ST OVER THE NORTH BRANCH CANAL OF THE CHICAGO RIVER PROPOSED SN 016-6209 MILE POST 2.99 25 0 25 CITY OF CHICAGO, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

TYPICAL BRIDGE CROSS SECTION SCALE IN FEET

03/30/2021 SHEET4 OF 6 H. W. LOCHNER ¡ Temporary Bent 5 Sta. 135+08.00 Waste Management ¡ Temporary Bent 6 P.G. EL. 17.64 Temporary Truck ¡ Temporary Bent 3 ¡ Temporary Bent 4 Sta. 135+55.00 Access Sta. 133+07.00 Sta. 134+48.00 P.G. EL. 15.65 ¡ Temporary N P.G. EL. 19.55 P.G. EL. 19.69 Bent 7 ¡ Temporary Bent 2 Sta. Sta. 132+47.00 136+06.63 P.G. EL. 17.51 409.61' (Measured Along PGL) P.G. EL. 13.86 Temporary Bridge Limits

48.50' 60.00' 141.00' (Span 3) 60.00' 47.00' ¡ Temporary Bent 1 Span 2 Span 4 an 1 Span 53 Sp . 5 .1 Temporary 1' Sta. 132+00.00 p k Sp l

m a Bridge Exist. ROW, n 6 a P.G. EL. 15.88 e Me as T w Typ. ur t A ed B ' lon o B Temp. Easement g 0 P o Pedestrian GL 0

A . F 9.30' 5 8.05' 8.64' Railing D

C ¡ Temporary

C Runaround and 90°0'0" PGL A

B Typ. 63°0'0" A 135+00 B 2.00' Concrete

B A B

Barrier B Prop. ROW, 9.79'

Typ. C C C .

' 10.74' ' l 10.18' ' ' A . . . 3 p 3 n n 0 0 B o C i i 3 r 3 B

0 0 . . P ' . . . M r M 3 3 2 l

a h 0 8 ' le t 2.00' Concrete d 2 C

i 7 6

C . 0 TSRS, Typ. ' W . 0 4 Barrier 0 0 l Proposed ¡ Bridge . . e n 0 n TSRS, 2.00' Concrete i 8 n 6 ha

and PGL M C 35+00 Typ. Barrier 35+00

' 35+00

0 Cofferdam Cofferdam ¡ Exist. Division St./ 0 .

¡ Exist. Bridge 2

¡ N. Branch Canal Temp. Easement Temp. Easement Exist. Bridge Permanent Sheet Piling Permanent Sheet Piling to be relocated PLAN ROADWAY CROSS SECTION DIMENSIONS:

Dim. Description X.XX' Water Depth from Design Low Water Elevation A 2.00' Painted Median B 12.00' Lane NOTES: C 5.00' Bike Lane 1. For Section A-A and Section B-B, see Sheet 6. D Temporary Footwalk (5.00' Min. and 6.83' Max.)

CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING

DIVISION ST OVER THE NORTH BRANCH CANAL OF THE CHICAGO RIVER PROPOSED SN 016-6209 MILE POST 2.99 100 0 100 CITY OF CHICAGO, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

TEMPORARY BRIDGE GENERAL PLAN SCALE IN FEET

03/30/2021 SHEET 5 OF 6 H. W. LOCHNER ¡ Temporary Bent 5 ¡ Temporary Bent 2 ¡ Temporary Bent 3 ¡ Temporary Bent 6 ¡ Temporary Bent 4 ¡ Temporary Bent 1 ¡ Temporary Bent 7

C B

CCD Elev. 0.00 A

* ' 5 2 .

8 ¡ North Brach Canal

Low Steel Elev. 16.27' 1

40.00'* 40.00'* * Measured perpendicular to ¡ North Branch Canal 80.00' Prop. Clear Channel Width* ** Minimum Vertical Clearance ELEVATION

48.00 Min.

49.83' Max. 49.99' 5.00' Min. Temporary Footwalk

5.00' 6.83' Max. Temporary Footwalk ¡ Temporary Runaround ¡ Temporary Runaround and PGL 2.00' and PGL 2.00' 2.00' Painted Median S. Footwalk to be Painted Median removed prior to 5.00' 12.00' 12.00' 5.00' 2.50' 5.00' 12.00' 12.00' 5.00' 2.50' Temporary Bridge Bike Lane Lane Bike Bike Lane Lane Bike Relocation. Lane Lane Lane Lane PGL PGL

Steel Beam (Designed Relocated Existing Acrow Bridge by Others) SECTION A-A SECTION B-B

TEMPORARY BRIDGE TEMPORARY BRIDGE

NOTES: WATER ELEVATION TABLE ELEVATION CONVERSION CHART 1. For locations of Section A-A and Section B-B, see Sheet 5.

Loc. Elev. Description Description CCD NGVD29 IGLD 1985

A -1.98 Design Low Water CCD 0.00 579.48 578.65

B 3.80 Design High Water Design Low Water -1.98 577.50 576.67

C 3.87 100 Year Flood 100 Year Flood 3.87 583.35 582.52

Historical High Water 5.00 584.48 583.65 CITY OF CHICAGO Ordinary High Water -0.83 578.65 577.82 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CCD = City of Chicago Datum DIVISION OF ENGINEERING NGVD29 = National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 IGLD 1985 = International Great Lakes Datum of 1985 DIVISION ST OVER THE NORTH BRANCH CANAL OF THE CHICAGO RIVER PROPOSED SN 016-6209 MILE POST 2.99 100 0 100 CITY OF CHICAGO, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

TEMP. BRIDGE ELEVATION AND SECTIONS SCALE IN FEET

03/30/2021 SHEET 6 OF 6 H. W. LOCHNER

EXISTING BRIDGE

GENERAL PLAN & ELEVATION

AND SECTION

AND

TEMPORARY BRIDGE

PLAN & ELEVATION

SN 016-6015 Division over the North Branch Canal

AERIAL EXHIBIT

AND

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS . T S WASTE N E MANAGEMENT E R G R E V E N O

R K H T I A H N

L G

S B S R B T A U E

N R D

C Y

H S S T C T R R A E E N

E E A T T L COOKTEK

CHA VACANT PROPERTY LOT GOLD COAST AUTO BODY

SN 016-6015 STOP STOP . ' W . 6 O 6 . R

STOP STOP TREET SHIANI DIVISION S INCORPORATED

PHILLIPS TOWING H H O I O C K K VACANT E O CTA MATERIAL R LOT R DISTRIBUTION CENTER Y S T A R V E E E N T U E

FED EX 8

4 EXISTING AERIAL VIEW

6 -

6 DIVISION STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1

0 CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

DIVISION OF ENGINEERING

N S DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2011 Division Street Project Photos

Existing Aerial Photo of Division Canal Bridge (Circa 1956) With Ogden Avenue and Halsted Street Below

A-1