DOCSLIB.ORG

LGBT Women1 Results from Lambda Legal’S Health Care Fairness Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LGBT Women1 Results from Lambda Legal’S Health Care Fairness Survey When Health Care Isn’t Caring: LGBT Women1 Results from Lambda Legal’s Health Care Fairness Survey In 2009, Lambda Legal conducted a survey, with the help reported that taxation of same-sex partner benefits was a of over 100 partner organizations, as part of a national problem for them, compared to 77 percent of non-female Health Care Fairness campaign. This survey is the first to respondents. Female respondents were also more likely examine experiences with refusal of care and barriers to than non-female respondents to be low-income and in health care access among LGBT and HIV communities2 relationships, providing some reasons why they were more on a national scale. The information in this report is vulnerable to these types of discrimination. gleaned from the 4,916 surveys completed. This fact sheet describes the discrimination, substandard care and barriers to health care experienced by LGBT Taxation of same-sex partner benefits refers to the women.2 Nearly 38 percent of respondents to this survey taxes that an individual must pay when he or she covers (1,866 people) identified as female. Of this group, 86 a same-sex partner or domestic partner under an percent (1,607 people) identified as non-transgender employer health insurance plan. The estimated amount female; almost 8 percent (143 people) identified as the employer pays to cover the partner is considered transgender; 5 percent (98 people) identified as gender taxable income by the federal government, as well as non-conforming or androgynous; and 1 percent (20 by a number of state governments, because they do people) identified as two-spirit. (Survey respondents could not allow same-sex couples, married or otherwise, the select more than one of these categories.) exemption that married heterosexuals receive for the value of their spousal health benefits. Discrimination and Substandard Care The results of this survey overall show that disturbing In several categories of discrimination covered in numbers of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) this survey, lesbian, gay or bisexual (LGB) female respondents as well as those living with HIV have respondents were more likely than their non-female experienced significant health care discrimination. counterparts to experience discrimination and substandard care. Respondents who identified as female were most likely to be affected by two particular types of discrimination: • Over 37 percent of LGB female respondents reported being denied infertility services and taxation of same- that they were treated differently than other people, sex partner benefits. compared to almost 28 percent of non-female gay and bisexual respondents. Nearly 18 percent of female respondents reported being denied infertility services, making them more than twice as • Over 53 percent of LGB female respondents reported likely as non-female respondents to report being denied being treated by health care providers who were these services. Eighty-two percent of female respondents unaware of the specific needs of LGB people, compared to 39 percent of non-female gay and 1 Generally, when “LGBT” is used, the “G” refers to gay men. However, when bisexual respondents. female-identified respondents were asked in this survey to identify their sexual orientation, nine percent said they were “gay,” therefore we are describing this Transgender or gender-nonconforming (TGNC) group as “LGBT women.” respondents who identified as female (also referred to as transfeminine) reported experiences of 2 There were not enough female-identified respondents living with HIV to analyze this group separately. As a result, this fact sheet only contains information discrimination and substandard care. These responses about female-identified LGBT survey respondents as a whole, both HIV positive were similar to those for TGNC respondents who identified and negative. as male (transmasculine). www.lambdalegal.org/health-care-report LGBT Women Discrimination and Substandard Care: Female LGB Compared to Female Transgender or Gender-nonconforming (TGnC) 57.9 60% LGB TGNC 53.2 50% 43.3 37.2 40% 30% 23.3 18.7 18.7 20% 14.1 10.0 8.4 9.4 10% 7.5 6.8 3.7 0% Physically Refused to Refused Blamed me Harsh language Treated me Unaware of rough or abusive touch me needed care differently health needs • Over 23 percent of female TGNC respondents Intersectionality theory makes it clear that it is impossible reported that they had been refused needed care to separate different types of discrimination and because of their gender identity. oppression because they intersect and interact to create, • Female TGNC respondents reported that medical sustain or deepen negative outcomes. In fact, the professionals were unaware of their specific needs (58 intersectional experience is greater than the sum of the 3 percent), treated them differently than other patients different types of discrimination. (43 percent), blamed them for the medical problem The intersectionality of sexism, homophobia, transphobia for which they sought care (19 percent) or used harsh and/or stigma based on HIV status can help explain why or abusive language toward them (19 percent). These LGBT female survey respondents were more likely to responses were similar to those for TGNC respondents experience some discrimination and barriers to care than who identified as male (transmasculine). non-female respondents. among TGNC survey respondents, those who identified as LGBT women have unique experiences that may not be female were somewhat less likely to say they were denied best addressed by policies and programs designed with trans-specific care (among those who wanted it). Thirty the incorrect assumption that all LGBT people are male. percent of female TGNC respondents reported this type Similarly, programs designed for heterosexual women of discrimination compared to 37 percent of non-female may not meet the needs of LGBT women. By taking TGNC respondents. intersectionality into account, policies and programs can more sufficiently address the particular ways in which LGBT Intersecting Forms of Discrimination women experience discrimination. It is well documented that women experience significant health disparities due to sexism and other factors. While Barriers to Health Care this survey was designed to examine the discrimination Female respondents also reported being worried about LGBT people and people living with HIV experience their ability to obtain needed health care. These concerns in health care based on their sexual orientation are barriers to care and can lead to a reluctance to seek (homophobia), gender identity (transphobia) and/or care and, as a result, poorer health outcomes. Female HIV status (HIV stigma), it is important to point out that respondents were worried that: LGBT people and people living with HIV may experience • There are not enough health professionals adequately discrimination based on a multiplicity of factors including gender, age, health status, race, ethnicity, class and 3 Kimberle Crenshaw, Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black national origin. Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics, 1989 U. CHI. LEGAL.F. 139,140. WHEN HEalth CaRE ISN’T CaRING www.lambdalegal.org/health-care-report LGBT Women Fears and Concerns About Accessing Health Care: Female LGB Compared to Female Transgender or Gender-nonconforming (TGnC) 100% LGB TGNC 88.5 85.3 80% 67.2 56.8 60% 53.4 54.1 48.8 46.8 40% 31.8 32.9 25.9 20% 8.8 0% I will be Not enough Not enough I will be Not enough Community fear refused care support groups substance treated differently trained professionals or dislike abuse providers trained to care for LGBT people (54 percent for LGB • Take intersectionality into account when females and 89 percent for transgender females); developing policies, programs and services. • Medical personnel will treat them differently because of • advocate for improved laws and accreditation their sexual orientation or gender identity (33 percent standards. for LGB females and 67 percent for transgender females); and Governments should: • They will be refused the medical care they need • Include equal coverage of LGBT people and because of their sexual orientation or gender identity people living with HIV in all antidiscrimination and (nearly 9 percent for LGB females and nearly 49 percent equal opportunity mandates. for transgender women). • Require all health care facilities and education programs that receive government funding to Key Recommendations develop and implement goals, policies and plans to ensure that LGBT people and people living with Health care institutions and providers should: HIV are treated fairly; and provide ongoing cultural • Establish nondiscrimination, employment, fair competency training for all health care students visitation and other policies that prohibit bias and and professionals. discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender • Change laws to require recognition of the families identity or expression and HIV status; recognize of LGBT people, including those who live within families of LGBT people and their wishes; and less common family structures, and require health provide a process for reporting and redressing care providers to do the same. discrimination if it occurs. • Pass laws that explicitly protect LGBT people and • Mandate cultural competency training for all health people living with HIV from discrimination in health care students and professionals about sexual care settings. orientation and gender identity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Definitions to Help Understand Gender and Sexual Orientation
    Definitions to Help Understand Gender and Sexual Orientation Asexual/Ace: A term that describes a person Gender Dysphoria: Clinically significant distress who lacks sexual attraction or desire for other caused when a person's assigned birth gender is people. not the same as the one in which they identify. Birth Assignment (Sex Assigned at Birth): According to the American Psychiatric This is generally determined by external genitalia at Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of birth––female, male or intersex. Mental Disorders (DSM), the term - which replaces Gender Identity Disorder - "is intended to better Bisexual/Bi+: A term that describes a person characterize the experiences of affected children, who is emotionally, romantically or sexually adolescents, and adults”. attracted to people of more than one gender, Gender Expression: sex, or gender identity. External appearance of one's gender identity, usually expressed through Cisgender: A term that describes a person whose behavior, clothing, haircut or voice, which may or gender identity aligns with the sex assigned to may not conform to socially defined behaviors and them at birth. characteristics typically associated with being Cis-Heteronormative: This term refers to the either feminine or masculine. assumption that heterosexuality and being Gender Identity: An internal, deeply felt sense of cisgender are the norm, which plays out in being female, male, a blend of both or neither. interpersonal interactions and society, and furthers Refers to how individuals perceive themselves and the marginalization of queer and gender diverse what they call themselves. Can be the same as or people. different from their sex assigned at birth.
    [Show full text]
  • France Covering the Period of January to December 2020
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION OF LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANS, AND INTERSEX PEOPLE IN FRANCE COVERING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY TO DECEMBER 2020 France ACCESS TO ADEQUATE FOOD EDUCATION The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically impacted the LGBTI Two young trans people people committed suicide due to school community, and particularly trans people, many of whom lost bullying this year, Doona in Montpellier on 23 September and their income. Civil society distributed food to those most in need. Avril / Luna in Lille on 16 December. For the past four years, SOS Local sex worker advocacy organisation, STRASS launched a Homophobie has reported a steady rise in discrimination and fundraiser for the same purpose. The Minister of Equality failed bullying, which LGBT students experience in schools. to put in place similar initiatives. EMPLOYMENT ASYLUM Local organisation Autre Cercle found in a new study that one in four LGBT people have experienced discrimination or violence at Several police raids were carried out against asylum seekers this work, and one in ten were physically or sexually assaulted. year, followed by harsh criticism by civil society. EQUALITY AND NON-DISCRIMINATION BIAS-MOTIVATED SPEECH Following its pledge last year, the Ministry of Equality published On 18 June, the Constitutional Council struck down the “Avia the National Action Plan for LGBT+ equality and against hate law” - France’s new hate speech law, which compelled online and discrimination (2020-2023) in October. The Plan sets out platforms to take down hateful content within 24 hours. a great number of goals, but civil society remained concerned The Council argued that the law’s limitations on freedom of about its potential in implementation and evaluation, without an expression were not necessary, appropriate, and proportionate, adequate budget in place.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT History
    LGBT History Just like any other marginalized group that has had to fight for acceptance and equal rights, the LGBT community has a history of events that have impacted the community. This is a collection of some of the major happenings in the LGBT community during the 20th century through today. It is broken up into three sections: Pre-Stonewall, Stonewall, and Post-Stonewall. This is because the move toward equality shifted dramatically after the Stonewall Riots. Please note this is not a comprehensive list. Pre-Stonewall 1913 Alfred Redl, head of Austrian Intelligence, committed suicide after being identified as a Russian double agent and a homosexual. His widely-published arrest gave birth to the notion that homosexuals are security risks. 1919 Magnus Hirschfeld founded the Institute for Sexology in Berlin. One of the primary focuses of this institute was civil rights for women and gay people. 1933 On January 30, Adolf Hitler banned the gay press in Germany. In that same year, Magnus Herschfeld’s Institute for Sexology was raided and over 12,000 books, periodicals, works of art and other materials were burned. Many of these items were completely irreplaceable. 1934 Gay people were beginning to be rounded up from German-occupied countries and sent to concentration camps. Just as Jews were made to wear the Star of David on the prison uniforms, gay people were required to wear a pink triangle. WWII Becomes a time of “great awakening” for queer people in the United States. The homosocial environments created by the military and number of women working outside the home provide greater opportunity for people to explore their sexuality.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Program Book
    CHICAGO GAY AND LESBIAN GHALLL OHF FAFME 2009 City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations Richard M. Daley Dana V. Starks Mayor Chairman and Commissioner Advisory Council on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Issues William W. Greaves, Ph.D. Director/Community Liaison COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations Advisory Council on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Issues 740 North Sedgwick Street, Suite 300 Chicago, Illinois 60654-3478 312.744.7911 (VOICE) 312.744.1088 (CTT/TDD) © 2009 Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame In Memoriam Robert Maddox Tony Midnite 2 3 4 CHICAGO GAY AND LESBIAN HALL OF FAME The Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame is both a historic event and an exhibit. Through the Hall of Fame, residents of Chicago and the world are made aware of the contributions of Chicago’s lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities and the communities’ efforts to eradicate bias and discrimination. With the support of the City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations, the Advisory Council on Gay and Lesbian Issues (now the Advisory Council on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Issues) established the Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame in June 1991. The inaugural induction ceremony took place during Pride Week at City Hall, hosted by Mayor Richard M. Daley. This was the first event of its kind in the country. The Hall of Fame recognizes the volunteer and professional achievements of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals, their organizations and their friends, as well as their contributions to the LGBT communities and to the city of Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT Global Action Guide Possible
    LGBT GLOBAL ACTION GUIDE UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST UNITED NATIONS OFFICE 777 UN Plaza, Suite 7G, New York, NY 10017 USA thanks The Unitarian Universalist United Nations Office wishes to thank the Arcus Foundation for its support which has made the research, writing UU-UNO Staff: and production of this LGBT Global Action Guide possible. While the UU-UNO was very active on the LGBT front in 2008, it was the Arcus Bruce F. Knotts Foundation grant, which began in 2009, that made it possible to Executive Director greatly enhance our LGBT advocacy at the United Nations and to far more effectively engage Unitarian Universalists and our friends in the Celestine Cox Office Coordinator work to end the horrible oppression (both legal and extra-legal) which governments allow and/or promote against people because of their Holly Sarkissian sexual orientation and gender identity. Envoy Outreach Coordinator It is our hope that this guide will prepare you to combat the ignorance Marilyn Mehr that submits to hate and oppression against people not for what they Board President have done, but for who they are. All oppression based on identity (racial, gender, ethnic, sexual orientation, religion, etc.) must end. Many Authors: hands and minds went into the production of this guide. In addition to the Arcus Foundation support, I want to acknowledge the staff, board, Diana Sands interns and friends of the Unitarian Universalist United Nations Office who made this guide possible. I want to acknowledge the work done Geronimo Desumala by the UU-UNO LGBT Associate, Diana Sands, LGBT Fellow Geronimo Margaret Wolff Desumala, III, LGBT intern Margaret Wolff, UU-UNO Board President, Marilyn Mehr, Ph.D., there are many more who should be thanked; Contributors: people who work at the UU-UNO and those who work with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro Sociological E
    Study on Homophobia, Transphobia and Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Sociological Report: Montenegro Disclaimer: This report was drafted by independent consultants and is published for information purposes only. Any views or opinions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not represent or engage the Council of Europe or the Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights. Table of Contents A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 A.1. Data Collection 3 B. FINDINGS 5 B.1. Public opinion and attitudes towards LGBT persons 5 B.2. Freedom of expression 7 B.3. Hate crime - hate speech 7 B.4. Family issues 8 B.5. Asylum and refugee issues 9 B.6. Education 9 B.7. Employment 9 B.8. Housing 9 B.9. Health care 9 B.10. Access to goods and services 10 B.11. Media 10 B.12. Transgender issues 11 B.13. Data availability 11 A. Executive summary 1. The general attitude towards LGBT persons in Montenegro is, by key stakeholders, labelled as conservative, patriarchal, negative, and as characterised by a practice of "don’t ask, don’t tell." The majority of the population considers homosexuality an illness. However, there are also signs of increased public debate and visibility. 2. There are no reports on bans on LGBT events or organisations. However, it is noted that, due to the risk of encountering hostile reactions, LGBT persons largely try to pass unnoticed and meetings are largely organised in private. At the time of writing there was no LGBT NGO registered as such in Montenegro.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Down to Basics: Tools to Support LGBTQ Youth in Care, Child Welfare League a Place of Respect: a Guide for Group Care of Am
    Getting Down to Basics Tools to Support LGBTQ Youth in Care Overview of Tool Kit Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) young people are in America’s child welfare and juvenile justice systems in disproportionate numbers. Like all young people in care, they have the right to be safe and protected. All too often, however, they are misunderstood and mistreated, leading to an increased risk of negative outcomes. This tool kit offers practical tips and information to ensure that LGBTQ young people in care receive the support and services they deserve. Developed in partnership by the Child Welfare League of America (CWLA) and Lambda Legal, the tool kit gives guidance on an array of issues affecting LGBTQ youth and the adults and organizations who provide them with out-of-home care. TOPICS INCLUDED IN THIS TOOL KIT 3 Basic Facts About Being LGBTQ 5 Information for LGBTQ Youth in Care 7 Families Supporting an LGBTQ Child FOSTERING TRANSITIONS 9 Caseworkers with LGBTQ Clients A CWLA/Lambda Legal 11 Foster Parents Caring for LGBTQ Youth Joint Initiative 13 Congregate Care Providers Working with LGBTQ Youth 15 Attorneys, Guardians ad Litem & Advocates Representing LGBTQ Youth 17 Working with Transgender Youth 21 Keeping LGBTQ Youth Safe in Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Placements 23 Working with Homeless LGBTQ Youth 25 Faith-Based Providers Working with LGBTQ Youth 27 Basic LGBTQ Policies, Training & Services for Child Welfare Agencies 29 Recommendations for Training & Education on LGBTQ Issues 31 What the Experts Say: Position & Policy Statements on LGBTQ Issues from Leading Professional Associations 35 LGBTQ Youth Resources 39 Teaching LGBTQ Competence in Schools of Social Work 41 Combating Misguided Efforts to Ban Lesbian & Gay Adults as Foster & Adoptive Parents 45 LGBTQ Youth Risk Data 47 Selected Bibliography CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE OF AMERICA CWLA is the nation’s oldest and largest nonprofit advocate for children and youth and has a membership of nearly 1000 public and private agencies, including nearly every state child welfare system.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ+ Glossary of Terms
    LGBTQ+ Glossary of Terms This glossary is offered as a starting point for discussion. Language is dynamic, continually growing and changing. This is particularly true with the language we use to identify ourselves. We should strive to ensure that our language does not demean, exclude or offend, by respectfully allowing others to self-identify and by mirroring those terms and identities. Ally: A person who does not identify with a group, but still advocates for that group's rights. Aromantic: In its broadest meaning, this umbrella term encompasses anyone who has a low or absent romantic attraction or interest in romantic activity. Sexual relationships may be desired. Asexual: In its broadest meaning, this umbrella term encompasses anyone who has a low or absent sexual attraction or interest in sexual activity. Intimate romantic/affectional relationships may be desired. Biphobia: Negative feelings, attitudes, actions, or behaviors against people who are, or are perceived to be, bisexual or pansexual. It may also be a fear of one's own bisexual or pansexual attractions. Bisexual: A person who is sexually and/or romantically attracted to men and women. Cisgender: Someone who is comfortable with the gender they were assigned at birth. The state of not being transgender. Cissexism: The systems of advantages bestowed on people who are cisgender. It can also be the assumption that all people are, or should be, cisgender. Crossdresser: A cisgender person who dresses in clothing deemed inappropriate by society for the gender assigned them at birth. The purpose is usually emotional comfort or erotic fulfillment. Drag King & Drag Queen: A person who cross-dresses as a means of performance or entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT Identity and Crime
    LGBT Identity and Crime LGBT Identity and Crime* JORDAN BLAIR WOODS** Abstract Recent studies report that LGBT adults and youth dispropor- tionately face hardships that are risk factors for criminal offending and victimization. Some of these factors include higher rates of poverty, over- representation in the youth homeless population, and overrepresentation in the foster care system. Despite these risk factors, there is a lack of study and available data on LGBT people who come into contact with the crim- inal justice system as offenders or as victims. Through an original intellectual history of the treatment of LGBT identity and crime, this Article provides insight into how this problem in LGBT criminal justice developed and examines directions to move beyond it. The history shows that until the mid-1970s, the criminalization of homosexuality left little room to think of LGBT people in the criminal justice system as anything other than deviant sexual offenders. The trend to decriminalize sodomy in the mid-1970s opened a narrow space for schol- ars, advocates, and policymakers to use antidiscrimination principles to redefine LGBT people in the criminal justice system as innocent and non- deviant hate crime victims, as opposed to deviant sexual offenders. Although this paradigm shift has contributed to some important gains for LGBT people, this Article argues that it cannot be celebrated as * Originally published in the California Law Review. ** Assistant Professor of Law, University of Arkansas School of Law, Fayetteville. I am thankful for the helpful suggestions from Samuel Bray, Devon Carbado, Maureen Carroll, Steve Clowney, Beth Colgan, Sharon Dolovich, Will Foster, Brian R.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Program Book
    2016 INDUCTION CEREMONY Friends of the Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame Gary G. Chichester Mary F. Morten Co-Chairperson Co-Chairperson Israel Wright Executive Director In Partnership with the CITY OF CHICAGO • COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS Rahm Emanuel Mona Noriega Mayor Chairman and Commissioner COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST Published by Friends of the Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame 3712 North Broadway, #637 Chicago, Illinois 60613-4235 773-281-5095 [email protected] ©2016 Friends of the Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame In Memoriam The Reverend Gregory R. Dell Katherine “Kit” Duffy Adrienne J. Goodman Marie J. Kuda Mary D. Powers 2 3 4 CHICAGO LGBT HALL OF FAME The Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame (formerly the Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame) is both a historic event and an exhibit. Through the Hall of Fame, residents of Chicago and the world are made aware of the contributions of Chicago’s lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities and the communities’ efforts to eradicate bias and discrimination. With the support of the City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations, its Advisory Council on Gay and Lesbian Issues (later the Advisory Council on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Issues) established the Chicago Gay and Lesbian Hall of Fame (changed to the Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame in 2015) in June 1991. The inaugural induction ceremony took place during Pride Week at City Hall, hosted by Mayor Richard M. Daley. This was the first event of its kind in the country. Today, after the advisory council’s abolition and in partnership with the City, the Hall of Fame is in the custody of Friends of the Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame, an Illinois not- for-profit corporation with a recognized charitable tax-deductible status under Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Issues Facing Bisexual Americans
    UNDERSTANDING ISSUES FACING BISEXUAL AMERICANS This report was authored by: 2 MAP thanks the following funders, without Movement Advancement Project whom this report would not have been possible. The Movement Advancement Project (MAP) is an independent think tank that provides rigorous David Bohnett Foundation research, insight and analysis that help speed equality David Dechman for LGBT people. MAP works collaboratively with David Geffen Foundation LGBT organizations, advocates and funders, providing Ford Foundation information, analysis and resources that help coordinate Gill Foundation and strengthen their efforts for maximum impact. MAP Esmond Harmsworth also conducts policy research to inform the public and Jim Hormel policymakers about the legal and policy needs of LGBT Johnson Family Foundation people and their families. Amy Mandel and Katina Rodis Weston Milliken BiNetUSA Kevin J. Mossier Foundation BiNet USA is America’s civil-rights & advocacy group for The Palette Fund all bisexual, fluid, pansexual & queer-identified people Mona Pittenger and their families, friends & allies. H. van Ameringen Foundation Sara Whitman Bisexual Resource Center Founded in 1985, the Bisexual Resource Center is the oldest national bisexual organization in the U.S. that advocates for bisexual visibility and raises awareness about bisexuality throughout the LGBT and straight communities. The BRC envisions a world where love is celebrated, regardless of sexual orientation or gender expression. Photos from Twitter project #WhatBiLooksLike About this report: (from left to right): The series of publications that includes UNDERSTANDING Top row: @revjanetedwards, Sara Chittenden & Kara Issues Facing LGBT Americans is a primer that introduces Kuhn, @siniharakka the major areas in which LGBT Americans face legal barriers to fully participating in life and provides a Middle row: Martha and Sarah – © Iris Jastram 2014, summary of what advocates are doing to work for Alejandro Montaño, ___ change.
    [Show full text]
  • Be True and Be You: a Basic Mental Health Guide for LGBTQ+ Youth
    A Basic Mental Health Guide for LGBTQ+ Youth If you are, or think you might be LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Questioning, and other identities), and going through a tough time, you’re not alone. Whether you’re trying to figure out your own identity or want to learn how to talk to others, it can be hard to know where to find support. The stigma and discrimination LGBTQ+ individuals may face from family, friends and society can increase risk for mental health challenges. However, it is important to remember that we are all unique and being LGBTQ+ doesn’t necessarily increase our risk for mental health issues. As an LGBTQ+ young person, there are certain stressors you may face from people who do not accept your orientation or gender identity. These pages don’t have all the answers; in fact, this is just the beginning—a basic guide for how to talk and think about sexual orientation, gender identity/expression, and mental health, some ways to cope with stress and emotions, and how to get support for yourself and others. Let’s start with defining the terms we use to describe the concepts of sexual orientation and gender identity/expression. Since words mean different things to different people, it’s important to have some common understanding before entering into a deeper discussion. 2 3 “I identify as transgender, more specifically gender fluid and genderqueer…Above all, I always feel that my spirit is of a gender that is neither male nor female, and being born in a female human body, it is not possible to have a body that matches the gender in which I spiritually exist.” – First, Do No Harm: Reducing Disparities for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Populations in California (2012)2 SEXUAL ORIENTATION GENDER IDENTITY & EXPRESSION Sexual orientation refers to who we are attracted to emotionally, physically, How you sense yourself inside as a man, a woman, a blend of both, and romantically.
    [Show full text]