Arxiv:Nucl-Th/9701058 V1 28 Jan 1997
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
IU/NTC 96{17 Recent Progress in Quantum Hadrodynamics Brian D. Serot Department of Physics and Nuclear Theory Center Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 John Dirk Walecka Department of Physics The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185 and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 12000 Jefferson Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23606 (December 14, 2001) Abstract Quantum hadrodynamics (QHD) is a framework for describing the nuclear many-body problem as a relativistic system of baryons and mesons. Motiva- tion is given for the utility of such an approach and for the importance of bas- ing it on a local, Lorentz-invariant lagrangian density. Calculations of nuclear matter and finite nuclei in both renormalizable and nonrenormalizable, effec- tive QHD models are discussed. Connections are made between the effective and renormalizable models, as well as between relativistic mean-field theory and more sophisticated treatments. Recent work in QHD involving nuclear structure, electroweak interactions in nuclei, relativistic transport theory, nu- arXiv:nucl-th/9701058 v1 28 Jan 1997 clear matter under extreme conditions, and the evaluation of loop diagrams is reviewed. To be published in International Journal of Modern Physics E Typeset using REVTEX 1 1. INTRODUCTION The study of atomic nuclei plays an important role in the development of many-body the- ories. Early experimental probes of the nucleus were limited to energy scales considerably less than the nucleon mass M 939 MeV=c2, and the nucleus has traditionally been described as a collection of nonrelativistic≈ nucleons interacting through an instantaneous two-body potential, with the dynamics given by the Schr¨odinger equation. The two-body potential is fitted to the empirical properties of the deuteron and to low-energy nucleon{nucleon (NN) scattering data, and one then attempts to predict the properties of many-nucleon systems. This is a difficult problem, because the NN potential is strong, short ranged (R 1 fm), spin dependent, and has a very repulsive central core. Nevertheless, over a period ≈of many years and with the advent of more and more powerful computers, reliable methods have been developed for solving the nonrelativistic nuclear many-body problem. A new generation of accelerators will allow us to study nuclei at higher energies, at shorter distances, and with greater precision than ever before. For example, electron{nucleus scat- tering at CEBAF (now known as the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility) will sample distance scales down to tenths of a Fermi, and ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions at RHIC may produce nuclear densities of 10 times equilibrium density and temperatures of several hundred MeV. These experiments will clearly involve physics that goes beyond the Schr¨odinger equation, such as relativistic motion of the nucleons, dynamical meson exchanges, baryon resonances, modifications of hadron structure in the nucleus, and the dy- namics of the quantum vacuum, which will include the production of a quark-gluon plasma. The challenge to theorists is to develop techniques that describe this new physics, while maintaining the important general properties of quantum mechanics, Lorentz covariance, electromagnetic gauge invariance, and microscopic causality. Since quantum chromodynamics (QCD) of quarks and gluons is the fundamental theory of the strong interaction, it is natural to look to QCD as the means to describe this new physics. While this may be desirable in principle, there are many difficulties in practice, primarily because the QCD coupling is strong at distance scales relevant for the vast ma- jority of nuclear phenomena. Although significant progress has been made in performing strong-coupling lattice calculations, actual QCD predictions at nuclear length scales with the precision of existing (and anticipated) data are not presently available. This situation will probably persist for some time, particularly with regard to many-nucleon systems. In contrast, a description based on hadronic degrees of freedom is attractive for several reasons. First, these variables are the most efficient at normal densities and low tempera- tures, and for describing particle absorption and emission, because these are the degrees of freedom actually observed in experiments. Second, hadronic calculations can be calibrated by requiring that they reproduce empirical nuclear properties and scattering observables; we can then extrapolate to the extreme situations mentioned earlier. As an example, accurate microscopic meson-exchange models have been constructed to describe the NN interaction [Na73,Br76,Pa79,Zu81,Ma87,Te87,Ma89,Pl94,St94]. These contain several mesons, the most + important of which are the π(0−; 1), σ(0 ; 0), !(1−; 0), and ρ(1−; 1), where the indicated quantum numbers denote spin, parity, and isospin, together with both N and ∆(1232) de- grees of freedom. Moreover, relativistic field theories of hadrons have been successful in describing the bulk and single-particle properties of nuclei and nuclear matter in the mean- 2 field and Dirac{Brueckner{Hartree{Fock approximations [Se86,Te87,Ma89,Se92]. Our basic goal is therefore to formulate a consistent microscopic treatment of nuclear systems using hadronic (baryon and meson) degrees of freedom. In principle, one could derive the form of the hadronic theory from the underlying QCD lagrangian, using the ideas of modern Effective Field Theory [We90a,We91,We92a,Ge93]. For example, one could define the low-energy effective theory by requiring scattering amplitudes computed using hadrons to \match" the corresponding amplitudes derived from the underlying theory. Unfortu- nately, unlike certain cases where this matching can be done (the Standard Model of weak interactions, QED descriptions of atomic physics, and interactions in heavy-quark systems) [Ma96], the derivation of a low-energy hadronic theory directly from QCD is intractable at present. Thus we must rely on other properties of QCD to constrain hadronic lagrangians. One constraint is that the effective hadronic theory should embody the symmetries of QCD: Lorentz invariance, parity conservation, isospin symmetry, and spontaneously broken chiral symmetry.1 These symmetry constraints severely restrict the forms of the allowed interactions, but they are insufficient to completely specify the low-energy dynamics. Thus we will use existing phenomenology to guide us in the construction of the effective lagrangian, in order to find the relevant degrees of freedom and the most efficient ways to structure the interactions. For example, meson-exchange models of the NN interaction tell us which mesons and baryons are the most important; these models have been useful both for scattering and for the nuclear matter problem. Moreover, experiments on the electrodisintegration of the deuteron show unambiguously the presence of pion-exchange currents, which arise when the incoming (virtual) photon couples to a pion being exchanged between two nucleons. Medium-energy pion{nucleus and proton{nucleus scattering indicate the importance of baryon resonances, such as the ∆, in nuclear reactions. In addition, a decomposition of the low-energy NN scattering amplitude using Lorentz invariants reveals that the empirical Lorentz scalar, vec- tor, and pseudoscalar amplitudes are much larger than the amplitudes deduced from a nonrelativistic decomposition containing Galilean invariants. These large amplitudes have important consequences for the spin, velocity, and density dependence of the NN interaction and are at the heart of relativistic descriptions of nucleon{nucleus scattering that reproduce spin observables in a very economical fashion [Mc83,Sh83,Cl83,Wa87]. Finally, relativis- tic mean-field models using classical Lorentz scalar and vector fields show that these are useful degrees of freedom for describing bulk and single-particle nuclear properties and for elucidating the important density dependence in the NN interaction. A Lorentz-covariant description is important for extrapolation to astrophysical objects and for describing processes at large energy-momentum transfer, as will be observed with the new accelerators. On the other hand, recasting the nuclear many-body problem in nonrela- tivistic form (i.e., with two-component rather than four-component nucleon spinors) leads to interactions (both two-body and few-body) that are similar to those used in successful cal- culations of few-nucleon systems. Many years of study within the nonrelativistic framework 1The final two symmetries are only approximate. We also want to maintain the usual gauge invariance in electromagnetic interactions. 3 have produced a quantitative description of the structure of light nuclei (here both NN and NNN potentials are important) [Wi92,Fr95,Pu95]. Moreover, we have a qualitative under- standing of some general features of nuclear structure, such as the importance of the Pauli principle in reducing NN correlations [Wa95], which justifies both the shell model and the single-nucleon optical potential, and the interplay of single-particle and collective degrees of freedom, which determines the shape of the nucleus [Ei87]. Although the equilibrium properties of nuclear matter cannot be precisely reproduced with modern NN potentials [Da83,Da85,Ja92a], the addition of a phenomenological, density-dependent interaction to the free NN potential leads to excellent results for the single-particle structure and charge and mass densities of a large number of nuclei [Go79]. One of the goals