DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Revised Land Management Plan for the Inyo National Forest Fresno, Inyo, Madera, Mono and Tulare Counties, California; Esmeralda and Mineral Counties, Nevada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Revised Land Management Plan for the Inyo National Forest Fresno, Inyo, Madera, Mono and Tulare Counties, California; Esmeralda and Mineral Counties, Nevada United States Department of Agriculture Draft Revised Land Management Plan for the Inyo National Forest Fresno, Inyo, Madera, Mono and Tulare Counties, California; Esmeralda and Mineral Counties, Nevada Forest Pacific Southwest Inyo National R5-MB-294 May Service Region Forest 2016 Cover: View looking west from the Baker Creek trail of the South Fork of Big Pine Creek. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. El USDA es un proveedor, empleador y prestamista que ofrece igualdad de oportunidad Draft Revised Land Management Plan for the Inyo National Forest Fresno, Inyo, Madera, Mono and Tulare Counties, California; Esmeralda and Mineral Counties, Nevada Responsible Official: Ed Armenta Forest Supervisor Inyo National Forest 351 Pacu Lane, Suite 200 Bishop, CA 93514-3101 (760)873-2400 For more information contact: Leeann Murphy Resource and Planning Staff Officer (760)873-2404 Contents Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 Location ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Distinctive Roles and Contributions of the Plan Area ................................................................. 7 Purpose of the Forest Plan ......................................................................................................... 11 Adaptive Planning ..................................................................................................................... 11 Plan Structure ............................................................................................................................ 12 Plan Components ....................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 2. Vision ........................................................................................................................... 15 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 15 Desired Conditions .................................................................................................................... 15 Air .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Watershed Conditions ............................................................................................................ 15 Terrestrial Ecosystems ........................................................................................................... 17 Animal and Plant Species ....................................................................................................... 31 Invasive Species ..................................................................................................................... 34 Fire ......................................................................................................................................... 35 Local Communities ................................................................................................................ 35 Volunteers, Interpretation, Partnerships and Stewardship ..................................................... 36 Timber .................................................................................................................................... 37 Range ..................................................................................................................................... 37 Sustainable Recreation ........................................................................................................... 38 Scenery ................................................................................................................................... 40 Tribal Relations and Uses ...................................................................................................... 41 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................. 41 Geology and Minerals ............................................................................................................ 42 Energy .................................................................................................................................... 43 Infrastructure .......................................................................................................................... 43 Lands ...................................................................................................................................... 44 Chapter 3. Management Strategy ................................................................................................... 45 Management Areas .................................................................................................................... 45 Strategic Fire Management Zones.......................................................................................... 45 Wilderness .............................................................................................................................. 49 Wild and Scenic Rivers .......................................................................................................... 55 Riparian Conservation Areas ................................................................................................. 57 Critical Aquatic Refuges ........................................................................................................ 64 Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail ........................................................................................ 65 Recreation Places ................................................................................................................... 68 Designated Areas ....................................................................................................................... 80 Wilderness .............................................................................................................................. 80 Mono Basin National Forest Scenic Area .............................................................................. 80 Wild and Scenic Rivers .......................................................................................................... 80 Ancient Bristlecone Pine Forest (National Protection Area) ................................................. 80 Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail ........................................................................................ 82 Inventoried Roadless Areas .................................................................................................... 82 National Recreation Trails ..................................................................................................... 82 Research Natural Areas .......................................................................................................... 83 Scenic Byways ....................................................................................................................... 84 Wild Horse and Burro Territories .......................................................................................... 84 Draft Revised Forest Plan i for the Inyo National Forest Contents Recommended Designated Areas .............................................................................................. 85 Recommended Wilderness .................................................................................................... 85 Plan Objectives .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Late Holocene Forest Dynamics, Volcanism, and Climate Change at Whitewing Mountain and San Joaquin Ridge, Mono County, Sierra Nevada, CA, USA ⁎ Constance I
    Quaternary Research 66 (2006) 273–287 www.elsevier.com/locate/yqres Late Holocene forest dynamics, volcanism, and climate change at Whitewing Mountain and San Joaquin Ridge, Mono County, Sierra Nevada, CA, USA ⁎ Constance I. Millar a, , John C. King b, Robert D. Westfall a, Harry A. Alden c, Diane L. Delany a a USDA Forest Service, Sierra Nevada Research Center, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Berkeley, CA 94701, USA b Lone Pine Research, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA c Smithsonian Institution, Center for Materials Research and Education, Suitland, MD 20746, USA Received 17 June 2005 Available online 16 June 2006 Abstract Deadwood tree stems scattered above treeline on tephra-covered slopes of Whitewing Mtn (3051 m) and San Joaquin Ridge (3122 m) show evidence of being killed in an eruption from adjacent Glass Creek Vent, Inyo Craters. Using tree-ring methods, we dated deadwood to AD 815– 1350 and infer from death dates that the eruption occurred in late summer AD 1350. Based on wood anatomy, we identified deadwood species as Pinus albicaulis, P. monticola, P. lambertiana, P. contorta, P. jeffreyi, and Tsuga mertensiana. Only P. albicaulis grows at these elevations currently; P. lambertiana is not locally native. Using contemporary distributions of the species, we modeled paleoclimate during the time of sympatry to be significantly warmer (+3.2°C annual minimum temperature) and slightly drier (−24 mm annual precipitation) than present, resembling values projected for California in the next 70–100 yr. © 2006 University of Washington. All rights reserved. Keywords: Paleoecology; Medieval climate; Late Holocene; Climate change; Long Valley volcanism; Inyo Craters; Forest history; Paleoclimatic modeling; Tree-ring dating Introduction bance remain poorly understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Sustainment: the North Fork Mono Tribe's
    Native Sustainment The North Fork Mono Tribe's Stories, History, and Teaching of Its Land and Water Tenure in 1918 and 2009 Jared Dahl Aldern Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from Prescott College in Education with a Concentration in Sustainability Education May 2010 Steven J. Crum, Ph.D. George Lipsitz, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Margaret Field, Ph.D. Theresa Gregor, Ph.D. External Expert Reader External Expert Reader Pramod Parajuli, Ph.D. Committee Chair Native Sustainment ii Copyright © 2010 by Jared Dahl Aldern. All rights reserved. No part of this dissertation may be used, reproduced, stored, recorded, or transmitted in any form or manner whatsoever without written permission from the copyright holder or his agent(s), except in the case of brief quotations embodied in the papers of students, and in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Requests for such permission should be addressed to: Jared Dahl Aldern 2658 East Alluvial Avenue, #103 Clovis, CA 93611 Native Sustainment iii Acknowledgments Gratitude to: The North Fork Mono Tribe, its Chairman, Ron Goode, and members Melvin Carmen (R.I.P.), Lois Conner, Stan Dandy, Richard Lavelle, Ruby Pomona, and Grace Tex for their support, kindnesses, and teachings. My doctoral committee: Steven J. Crum, Margaret Field, Theresa Gregor, George Lipsitz, and Pramod Parajuli for listening, for reading, and for their mentorship. Jagannath Adhikari, Kat Anderson, Steve Archer, Donna Begay, Lisa
    [Show full text]
  • Devils Postpile National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Devils Postpile National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/160 THIS PAGE: The dramatic columns of Devils Postpile are between 12 and 18 m (40 and 60 ft) tall and up to 1.1 m (3.5 ft) in diameter. Seismic and weathering processes fracture the columns along joints. Broken columns litter the slopes beneath Devils Postpile. ON THE COVER: Top view of the 100,000 year-old columns of Devils Postpile. The columns are world-renowned and many form the ideal hexagonal shape. The striations and scratches are evidence that glaciers advanced over the columns, scouring their surface. National Park Service photographs. Devils Postpile National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/160 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 February 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Denver, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICLE in PRESS + Model
    ARTICLE IN PRESS + model YQRES-02727; No. of pages: 15; 4C: Quaternary Research xx (2006) xxx–xxx 1 www.elsevier.com/locate/yqres 2 Late holocene forest dynamics, volcanism, and climate change at whitewing 3 mountain and San Joaquin Ridge, Mono County, Sierra Nevada, CA, USA ⁎ 4 Constance I. Millar a, , John C. King b, Robert D. Westfall a, Harry A. Alden c, Diane L. Delany a 5 a USDA Forest Service, Sierra Nevada Research Center, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Berkeley, CAOF 94701, USA 6 b Lone Pine Research, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA 7 c Smithsonian Institution, Center for Materials Research and Education, Suitland, MD 20746, USA 8 Received 17 June 2005 9 Abstract 10 Deadwood tree stems scattered above treeline on tephra-covered slopes of Whitewing Mtn (3051 m) and San Joaquin Ridge (3122 m) show 11 evidence of being killed in an eruption from adjacent Glass Creek Vent, Inyo Craters. Using tree-ring methods, we dated deadwood to AD 815– 12 1350, and infer from death dates that the eruption occurred in late summer AD 1350. Based on wood anatomy, we identified deadwood species as 13 Pinus albicaulis, P. monticola, P. lambertiana, P. contorta, P. jeffreyi, and Tsuga mertensiana. Only P. albicaulis grows at these elevations 14 currently; P. lambertiana is not locally native. Using contemporary distributionsED of the species, PRO we modeled paleoclimate during the time of 15 sympatry to be significantly warmer (+3.2°C annual minimum temperature) and slightly drier (−24 mm annual precipitation) than present, 16 resembling values projected for California in the next 70–100 yr.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMP: SUMMER Trail Survey On-Site Computer Stations Photo 1
    CAMP Online Trails Surveys In cooperation with the Town of Mammoth Lakes, Alta Planning + Design, and Trail Solutions, MLTPA provided feedback on both the Summer and Winter Online Trail Survey questions and format, which were developed by the TOML and the consultant teams with assistance from the survey hosting company, Leisure Trends. MLTPA also conducted the majority of public outreach for these surveys, the methods of which are discussed below. The Summer Online Trail Survey ran from October 27, 2007, to March 14, 2008, and was completed by 330 people. The Winter Online Trail Survey ran from December 18, 2007, to March 14, 2008, and was completed by 316 people. (An unknown number of participants in both cases started taking the surveys, but did not finish; as a result, their input is not reflected in these totals.) Results and copies of the survey contents are available in Appendix E, “CAMP: Summer Survey Data (TOML),” and Appendix F, “CAMP: Winter Survey Data (TOML).” • Business cards Beginning with CAMP: WINTER outreach efforts, MLTPA designed, produced, and distributed business cards driving people to the MLTPA website to take both the Summer and Winter surveys. Cards were handed out by individuals and also were provided to a number of local businesses with display-ready cardholders to minimize point-of-sale clutter. • E-mail campaigns As part of their regular e-mail blasts for both events, MLTPA invited recipients to participate in both the Summer and Winter trail surveys, providing direct links to the survey URLs. Please see the “E-mail campaigns” chapters of the “CAMP: SUMMER” and “CAMP: WINTER” reports for further detail.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 X9a and A16 Zone Hunt Info
    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Wildlife Branch 1010 Riverside Parkway, West Sacramento, CA 95605 ZONE X9a and Area-Specific Archery Hunt A16 2021 General Deer Hunting Information (Includes Additional Hunts G-39 and J-12) GENERAL INFORMATION This information sheet has been prepared to assist deer hunters applying for, or planning to hunt in, Zone X-9a located in portions of Fresno, Inyo, Madera, and Mono counties. The following information should be useful to hunters for archery season (A- 16; Zone X-9a Archery Hunt), Zone X-9a general season, and any “additional hunts” within this geographic area. For more specific information or additional questions regarding this area, contact the following Department office(s): • Inland Deserts Region (Region 6), Bishop Field Office (760-872-1171). REGULATIONS Laws and regulations are designed to conserve wildlife and to provide for an equitable distribution of game mammals. All hunters should read and be familiar with the Current Hunting Regulations. Remember, if you are hunting on private property you must obtain, and have in your possession, written permission to hunt on private property. Hunter trespass laws are strictly enforced. NON-LEAD RESTRICTIONS As of July 1, 2019, all hunters must use nonlead ammunition when taking any wildlife in California, except when hunting with a pellet rifle for approved species. • CCR T14 250.1(d)(3) Effective July 1, 2019, it shall be unlawful to use, or possess with any firearm capable of firing, any projectile(s) not certified as nonlead when taking any wildlife for any purpose in this state.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Ecosystems
    TWENTY-NINE Alpine Ecosystems PHILIP W. RUNDEL and CONSTANCE I. MILLAR Introduction Alpine ecosystems comprise some of the most intriguing hab­ writing about the alpine meadows of the Sierra Nevada, felt itats of the world for the stark beauty of their landscapes and his words were inadequate to describe “the exquisite beauty for the extremes of the physical environment that their resi­ of these mountain carpets as they lie smoothly outspread in dent biota must survive. These habitats lie above the upper the savage wilderness” (Muir 1894). limit of tree growth but seasonally present spectacular flo­ ral shows of low-growing herbaceous perennial plants. Glob­ ally, alpine ecosystems cover only about 3% of the world’s Defining Alpine Ecosystems land area (Körner 2003). Their biomass is low compared to shrublands and woodlands, giving these ecosystems only a Alpine ecosystems are classically defined as those communi­ minor role in global biogeochemical cycling. Moreover, spe­ ties occurring above the elevation of treeline. However, defin­ cies diversity and local endemism of alpine ecosystems is rela­ ing the characteristics that unambiguously characterize an tively low. However, alpine areas are critical regions for influ­ alpine ecosystem is problematic. Defining alpine ecosystems encing hydrologic flow to lowland areas from snowmelt. based on presence of alpine-like communities of herbaceous The alpine ecosystems of California present a special perennials is common but subject to interpretation because case among alpine regions of the world. Unlike most alpine such communities may occur well below treeline, while other regions, including the American Rocky Mountains and the areas well above treeline may support dense shrub or matted European Alps (where most research on alpine ecology has tree cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Mammoth Lakes Trail System Master Plan
    Town of Mammoth Lakes Trail System Master Plan Adopted: October 19, 2011 Acknowledgements This Town of Mammoth Lakes Trail System Master Plan (2011) is the result of a multi- partnered and multi-jurisdictional Concept and Master Planning (CAMP) process. The CAMP Process, and the update of the previous Town of Mammoth Lakes Trail System Plan, was initiated by the Mammoth Lakes Trails and Public Access Foundation (MLTPA), a non- profit organization, in the spring of 2007. Jurisdictional Partners Town of Mammoth Lakes United States Forest Service Funding Partners The Town of Mammoth Lakes (TOML) Mammoth Mountain Ski Area, LLC (MMSA) The Developers’ Forum (A joint effort of the Mammoth Lakes Chamber of Commerce and MLTPA) Cardinal Investments Mammoth Crossing The Mammoth Lakes Trails and Public Access Foundation (MLTPA) Funding through the generous support of the following: The Sierra Nevada Conservancy* The Flora Family Foundation The Virginia Wellington Cabot Foundation Planning Partners The Town of Mammoth Lakes United States Forest Service Mammoth Mountain Ski Area The Mammoth Lakes Trails and Public Access Foundation (MLTPA) Consultant Team Alta Planning + Design Trail Solutions Corbin Design Beneficial Designs *A portion of the funding for MLTPA was provided by the Sierra Nevada Conservancy, an agency of the State of California. Cover photo in second row (right) provided by Christian Pondella. All other photos and images in this document were provided by TOML, MLTPA, or the consultant team unless otherwise noted. Table of Contents Executive
    [Show full text]
  • From the Constitution of the North Fork Mono Tribe
    FROM THE CONSTITUTION OF THE NORTH FORK MONO TRIBE ARTICLE I: TERRITORY The territorial jurisdiction of the Tribe shall extend to all lands within the counties of Madera and Fresno, State of California, in the vicinity of the North Fork Rancheria which are part of the traditional territory of the Tribe. The central location of where the majority of members of the North Fork Mono Tribe reside is within a 10 mile radius in all directions from the North Fork Mono Indian Rancheria, and the Sierra Mono Museum in North Fork, California.The traditional geographical territorial boundary of the North ForkMono has been for hundreds of years and still is as follows: Starting at the SW corner, where Fowler Mt. and the San Joaquin River join. Following the San Joaquin River east from Kerckhoff Lake around Long Ridge to Redinger Lake. Heading in an eastern direction including Kinsman Flats, Chawanakee Flats, northern section of Jose Basin, proceeding along Stevenson Creek to the northwest edge of Shaver Lake. Proceeding east including the northern section of Shaver Lake to Tunnel Creek. From Tunnel Creek east to the crest of the Sierra Nevada Mountains in the vicinity of Mt. Darwin, including Coyote Lake, northern parts of Dinkey Creek, Helms and Dusty Creek, North Fork of the Kings River, Fleming Creek, and the South Fork of the San Joaquin River. From Mt. Darwin proceeding north along the crest of the Sierras as the eastern boundary of the North Fork Mono. The eastern traditional line includes Mt. Humphreys, Mt . Tom, Mt . Morgan, turning northwest to Mammoth Mt .
    [Show full text]
  • Nature and History on the Sierra Crest: Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Devils Postpile Formation and Talus
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Devils Postpile National Monument California Nature and History on the Sierra Crest Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Christopher E. Johnson Historian, PWRO–Seattle Nature and History on the Sierra Crest: Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Devils Postpile formation and talus. (Devils Postpile National Monument Image Collection) Nature and History on the Sierra Crest Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Christopher E. Johnson Historian, PWRO–Seattle National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 2013 Production Project Manager Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Copyeditor Heather Miller Composition Windfall Software Photographs Credit given with each caption Printer Government Printing Office Published by the United States National Park Service, Pacific West Regional Office, Seattle, Washington. Printed on acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America. 10987654321 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Club Records, 1891
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf4x0nb0qs No online items Guide to the Sierra Club Records, 1891- Processed by Lauren Lassleben, Xiuzhi Zhou, Karen Gracy and Dennis Scott Additions processed by Lisa Monhoff with support from the National Historical Publications and Records Commission. The Bancroft Library © 1997, © 2019 The Bancroft Library University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/libraries/bancroft-library Note History --History, CaliforniaGeographical (By Place) --CaliforniaSocial Sciences --Urban Planning and EnvironmentBiological and Medical Sciences --Agriculture --ForestryBiological and Medical Sciences --Agriculture --Wildlife ManagementSocial Sciences --Sports and Recreation Guide to the Sierra Club Records, BANC MSS 71/103 c 1 1891- Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: The Bancroft Library Title: Sierra Club records, creator: Sierra Club Identifier/Call Number: BANC MSS 71/103 c Physical Description: 490 linear feet (395 cartons, 1 box, 22 volumes, 1 oversize folder) Date (inclusive): 1891- Abstract: The records form one of the largest and most comprehensive collections of environmental records in the United States. The Club designated The Bancroft Library as its official archives in 1958, and the organization began transferring records from the San Francisco office to the Library on a regular basis in 1970. A very wide range of record types are included in the collection, including correspondence, minutes, agendas, reports, by-laws, financial records, scrapbooks, sample ballots, notes, rosters, action alerts, statements and testimony, press releases, clippings, and policy statements. Documentation for the early years is scarce, since the Club's office in San Francisco was destroyed in the 1906 earthquake and fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenozoic Volcanic Rocks of the Devils Postpile Quadrangle, Eastern Sierra Nevada California
    Cenozoic Volcanic Rocks of the Devils Postpile Quadrangle, Eastern Sierra Nevada California By N. KING HUBER and C. DEAN RINEHART SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 554-D Prepared in cooperation with the California Division of Mines and Geology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1967 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Tuff of Reds Meadow Continued Abstract______________________________ Dl Zonation in the tuff Continued Page Introduction. ___________________________ 1 Upper flow unit- _ _____ Dll Petrologic and chemical data_____________ 2 Lower zone of partial welding- 11 Microscopic petrography___________ 2 ____ 11 Chemical data______________________ 2 12 Classification______________________ __ 12 Andesite of Deadman Pass___-________ _____ 13 _ __ 14 Quartz latite of Two Teats__________ i7 Andesite from Deadman-Glass Creeks area- 9 Andesite from Dry Creek area__ _ __ _ _ _____ 15 Andesite of Pumice Butte. ._._._ - - ___ 16 Tuff of Reds Meadow_-----__---_-------- 10 __ __ 16 Zonation in the tuff_----_--__-----___- 10 Basalt of the Red Cones. _____ 16 Lower flow unit________________. 10 Rhyolite _ _ _ __ _ __- _____ 17 Lower zone of no welding____ 10 Pumice- _ _____ 19 Lower zone of partial welding- 10 __ _ 19 Zone of intense welding_____ 10 _____ 20 Upper zone of partial welding. 11 References. _ _ _ 20 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FKONTISPIECE. Photograph showing well-developed columnar jointing in andesite at the Devils Postpile.
    [Show full text]