A Bird's-Eye View of Modernity: the Synoptic View in Nineteenth-Century Cityscapes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Human Longing Is for Nothing Less Than the Reconciliation of Time and Place
uman longing is for nothing less than the reconciliation of time and place, of past and future, of the many and the one, of the living and the dead. HBoston is precious because it lives in the national imagination, and increasingly the world’s, just so— as a still brilliant map of America’s good hope. —James Carroll from Mapping Boston Helping to Build The Good City The Boston Foundation works closely with its donors to make real, measurable change in some of the most important issues of our day. A number of key areas of community life benefited from the Foundation’s “Understanding Boston” model for social change in 2005: Research This year, the Foundation’s third biennial Boston Indicators Report identified the key competitive issues facing Boston and the region and offered an emerging civic agenda. The Foundation also released the third annual “Housing Report Card” and a report on ways for towns and cities to build affordable housing without increasing school costs. Other reports focused on goals for Boston Harbor and the Waterfront—and the impact and role of Greater Boston’s higher education institutions through the Carol R. Goldberg Seminar. Major Convenings All Boston Foundation reports are released at forums attracting thousands of people every year. In 2005 alone, the Foundation held some 20 forums on a diverse set of issues—including two major housing convenings, sessions focused on strengthening the nonprofit sector and community safety—and forums examining the effects of the tsunami and Hurricane Katrina on national and local philanthropy. Task Forces Task Forces of experts and stakeholders are convened and facilitated by the Foundation. -
Location of Cardinal Points from the ABCD Matrix for the General Optical System
EE482 Fall 2000 Handout #2 Page 1 Location of Cardinal Points from the ABCD Matrix for the General Optical System I II n1 n2 F1 P1 N1 P2 N2 F2 f1 f2 Figure 1 Cardinal points of a system which is characterized by an ABCD matrix between an input plane I and an output plane II. Cardinal Point Measured Function Special Case From To (n1=n2) First Focal Point P1 F1 -n1/(n2C)-1/C First Principle Point I P1 (n1-n2D)/(n2C)(1-D)/C First Nodal Point I N1 (1-D)/C (1-D)/C Second Focal Point P2 F2 -1/C -1/C Second Principle Point II P2 (1-A)/C (1-A)/C Second Nodal Point II N2 (n1-n2A)/(n2C)(1-A)/C Table 1 When analyzing an optical system, we often are first interested in basic properties of the system such as the focal length (or optical power of the system) and the location of the focal planes, etc. In the limit of paraxial optics, any optical system, from a simple lens to a combination of lenses, mirrors and ducts, can be described in terms of six special surfaces, called the cardinal surfaces of the system. In paraxial optics, these surfaces are planes, normal to the optical axis. The point where the plane intersects the optical axis is the cardinal point corresponding to that cardinal plane. The six special planes are: First Focal Plane Second Focal Plane First Principle Plane Second Principle Plane First Nodal Plane Second Nodal Plane Once we know the location of these special planes, relative to the physical location of the lenses in the system, we can describe all of the paraxial imaging properties of the system. -
Optical Performance:: Characterization of a Pupillometric Camera
RELATED TITLES Documents Science & Tech Tech Digital & Social Media 58 views 0 0 Abb Uploaded by Mabel Ruiz AP-Physical Low Light Manual Twilight Retrato Science Sample Photography for Render 1.4.5 Aberration document explaining the Seidel coefficients Full description Save Embed Share Print S-118.4250 PPOSTGRADUATE SEMINAR ON ILLUMINATION ENGINEERING ,, SSPRING 2008 LLIGHTING UUNIT,, DDEPARTMENT OF EELECTRONICS,, HHELSINKI UUNIVERSITY OF TTECHNOLOGY (TKK) OPTICAL PERFORMANCE:: CHARACTERIZATION OF A PUPILLOMETRIC CAMERA Petteri Teikari,, [email protected] Emmi Rautkylä,, emmi.rautkylä@tkk.fi RELATED TITLES Documents Science & Tech Tech Digital & Social Media 58 views 0 0 Abb Uploaded by Mabel Ruiz AP-Physical Low Light Manual Twilight Retrato Science Sample Photography for Render 1.4.5 Aberration document explaining the Seidel coefficients Full description Save Embed Share Print RELATED TITLES Documents Science & Tech Tech Digital & Social Media 58 views 0 0 Abb Uploaded by Mabel Ruiz AP-Physical Low Light Manual Twilight Retrato Science Sample Photography for Render 1.4.5 Aberration document explaining the Seidel coefficients Full description Save Embed Share Print TABLE OF CONTENTS A A BSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. TT ABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................2 11 IINTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................3 -
PEABODY SQUARE Ashmont
The Clock in PEABODY SQUARE Ashmont On the occasion of the Welcome Home Ceremony, May 31, 2003, for the newly restored Monument Clock in Peabody Square, Dorchester Foreword The celebration of the re-installation of the Peabody Square Clock offers an opportunity to reflect on Dorchester’s history. Through the story of the clock — how it came to be here, how the park in which it stands was created, how it was manufactured, how it has stood for decades telling the hours as Dorchester life con- tinues — we can see the story of our communi- ty. The clock, like many features of the urban landscape that have stood for many years, has become a part of the place in which we live. A sense of place, our place, helps to ground our thoughts, to provide a starting point for where we are going. Our community’s history can inspire us by providing a perspective on the course of our own lives. Recognizing and embracing and caring for the symbols of our place can reward us; these symbols can inform and educate and entertain. They make Dorchester Dorchester. Acknowledgements We thank the City of Boston and Mayor Thomas M. Menino for seeing this important project through. We appreciate the City’s commitment and the support of the Edward Ingersoll Browne Fund and the City’s Neighborhood Improvements through Capital Expenditures (N.I.C.E.) Program. Several individuals who worked on the project deserve special mention for their unstinting efforts over the course of many months. 1. John Dalzell who coordinated the process from the city’s end; 2. -
TENTACLES TAKE HOLD at the NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM +300 MORE THINGS to DO in BOSTON RIGHT NOW! Bostonguide.Com OYSTER PERPETUAL YACHT-MASTER II
July 4–17, 2016 THE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO BOSTON PANORAMAEVENTS | SIGHTS | SHOPPING | MAPS | DINING | NIGHTLIFE | CULTURE TENTACLES TAKE HOLD at the NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM +300 MORE THINGS TO DO IN BOSTON RIGHT NOW! bostonguide.com OYSTER PERPETUAL YACHT-MASTER II rolex oyster perpetual and yacht-master are ® trademarks. July 4–17, 2016 THE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO BOSTON Volume 66 • No. 4 contents Features Pops Stars 6 Singing sensations Nick Jonas and Demi Lovato join the annual Boston Pops Fireworks Spectacular PANO’s Guide to 8 Outdoor Dining Enjoy prime patio season at these top spots for al fresco fare 6 Departments 10 Boston’s Official Guide 10 Multilingual 15 Current Events 21 On Exhibit 24 Shopping 27 Cambridge 30 Maps 36 Neighborhoods 8 40 Real Estate 42 Sightseeing 48 Beyond Boston 50 Freedom Trail 52 Dining 62 Boston Accent Aquarist Bill Murphy of the New England Aquarium ON THE COVER: The giant Pacific octopus at the New England Aquarium (refer to listing, page 47). 62 PHOTOS (TOP TO BOTTOM): NICK JONAS AND DEMI LOVATO COURTESY OF THE BOSTON POPS; LEGAL HARBORSIDE BY CHIP NESTOR; COURTESY OF NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM BOSTONGUIDE.COM 3 THE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO BOSTON bostonguide.com SPECTACULAR VIEWS July 4–17, 2016 Volume 66 • Number 4 Tim Montgomery • Publisher Scott Roberto • Art Director/Acting Editor Laura Jarvis • Assistant Art Director EXQUISITE CUISINE Andrea Renaud • Senior Account Executive Olivia J. Kiers • Editorial Assistant Keren Osuji, Shannon Nicole Steffen Editorial Interns UNSURPASSED SERVICE At this Tim Montgomery • President & CEO Boston takes Tyler J. Montgomery • Vice President, Operations on a beauty Rita A. -
Custom House Tower
Custom House Tower Located in the National Register of Historic Places - Custom House District, the original neoclassical- designed Boston Custom House building was completed in 1844 and the clock tower later completed in 1915. This National Historic Landmark was the tallest building in Boston until 1964. 3 McKinley Square Financial District Boston, MA Architectural Features Neo-Classical Design < Original Base Structure > Cruciform (cross) Shaped Greek Doric Patio & Roman Dome 36 Fluted Doric Granite Columns Each Column - Single Piece of Granite Columns 32’ high | 5’ Diameter Top Portion of Building 26th Floor | Observation Deck Tower Clock | 22’ Diameter | 4 Faces Building Use and Transition Developed at Base of City Docks (prior to land reclamation) Location Facilitated Cargo Registration & Inspection Conversion to 80 Room Hotel Marriott Custom House PROJECT SUMMARY Project Description A Neo-Classical designed architectural and historic landmark comprised of a 3-story cruciform (cross) shape building with a Greek Doric portico, Roman dome and 36 fluted Doric columns, each carved from a single piece of granite from nearby Quincy, Massachusetts. The building was positioned at the base of the shipping docks, prior to land reclamation in the Boston seaport area. The 32 story, 356’ Custom House Clock Tower was later completed between 1913 - 1915 and was the tallest building in Boston until 1964. Official Building Name Custom House Tower Marriott Custom House (2016) Other Building Names Boston Custom House U.S. Custom House Location Boston Custom House District | National Register of Historic Places 3 McKinley Square, Boston, MA in Boston’s Financial District Bordered by McKinley Square, State Street, India Street & Central Street Original Custom House Site Purchased - 1837 | Completion - 1847 Clock Tower Start - 1913 | Completion - 1915 History Custom House original use - shipping inspection & registration Federally owned until 1987 Custom House Tower - Tallest building in Boston 1915 to 1964 LEADERSHIP | OWNERSHIP | PROJECT DESIGN U.S. -
Greenway District Planning Study Use and Development Guidelines
Greenway District Planning Study Use and Development Guidelines City of Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino Boston Redevelopment Authority John F. Palmieri, Director August 2010 City of Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino Boston Redevelopment Authority One City Hall Square Boston, MA 02201 617.722.4300 www.bostonredevelopmentauthority.org John F. Palmieri, Director Brian P. Golden, Executive Director/Secretary Kairos Shen, Chief Planner Prataap Patrose, Deputy Director of Urban Design Richard McGuinness, Deputy Director for Waterfront Planning David Carlson, Senior Architect Project Managers Peter D. Gori, Senior Manager Public Realm Projects Lauren Shurtleff, Planner II Utile, Inc. Architecture + Planning 50 Summer Street Boston, MA 02110 617.423.7200 www.utiledesign.com Greenberg Consultants Inc. 20 Niagara Street Unit 603 Toronto M5V 3L8 Ontario, Canada 416.603.3777 www.greenbergconsultants.com HR&A Advisors Inc. 99 Hudson Street 3rd Floor New York, NY 10013 212.977.5597 www.hraadvisors.com Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates 10 High Street Suite 903 Boston, MA 02110 617.521.9404 www.nelsonnygaard.com Boston Redevelopment Authority [Letter from Mayor Menino] 1 The Boston Redevelopment Authority Greenway District Planning Study Use and Development Guidelines 2 [ This page left intentionally blank ] Boston Redevelopment Authority [Letter from John F. Palmieri] 3 The Boston Redevelopment Authority Greenway District Planning Study Use and Development Guidelines 4 [ This page left intentionally blank ] Boston Redevelopment Authority Table of Contents 01. Purpose of the Study 7 02. Study Methodology and Summary 9 Urban Design and Form Environmental Conditions Program and Use Economics 11 03. District-Wide Guidelines Ground Floor Program 5 and Streetscape Activation Environmental Principles 04. -
CURRICULUM PACKET a Teacher’S Guide to Integrating the Museum and Classroom
ADDISON GALLERY OF AMERICAN ART CURRICULUM PACKET A Teacher’s Guide to Integrating the Museum and Classroom WINTER 2006 SPECIAL EXHIBITIONS , 1815, oil on panel, s William Vareika f arles Jone h ca. 1850-1855, ft o i New York Portrait of C y, erican Art, g ller a nt G ry of Am e George Eastman House Collection 2005, Oil on canvas, of K y Reverand Rollin Heber Neale, Embrace, ourtes C eenwood, (1779 - 1856), , Hawes, r Iver, . c n 6 i 3 outhworth & 8 in. x Ethan Allen G 26 x 18 3/4 in., Addison Galle S Whole plate daguerreotype, ©Beverly M 4 Portraits of a People: Young America: Raising Renee: Picturing African Americans The Daguerreotypes of Paintings by Beverly McIver in the Nineteenth Century Southworth & Hawes January 14 – February 26 January 14 – March 26 January 28 – April 9 ADDISON GALLERY OF AMERICAN ART EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Phillips Academy, Andover, MA Julie Bernson, Director of Education Rebecca Spolarich, Education Fellow Contact (978) 749-4037 or [email protected] FREE GROUP TOURS for up to 55 students are available on a first-come, first-served basis: TUESDAY-FRIDAY, 8AM-4PM PUBLIC MUSEUM HOURS: TUESDAY-SATURDAY 10AM-5PM & SUNDAY 1-5PM Admission to the museum and all events is free! Exploring the Exhibitions This winter the Addison Gallery presents three special exhibitions which each speak to the enduring powers of portraiture and identity in unique ways: x Portraits of a People: Picturing African Americans in the Nineteenth Century x Young America: The Daguerreotypes of Southworth & Hawes x Raising Renee: Paintings by Beverly McIver Individually the exhibitions express the various ways that Americans have chosen to portray themselves over time. -
The Techniques and Material Aesthetics of the Daguerreotype
The Techniques and Material Aesthetics of the Daguerreotype Michael A. Robinson Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Photographic History Photographic History Research Centre De Montfort University Leicester Supervisors: Dr. Kelley Wilder and Stephen Brown March 2017 Robinson: The Techniques and Material Aesthetics of the Daguerreotype For Grania Grace ii Robinson: The Techniques and Material Aesthetics of the Daguerreotype Abstract This thesis explains why daguerreotypes look the way they do. It does this by retracing the pathway of discovery and innovation described in historical accounts, and combining this historical research with artisanal, tacit, and causal knowledge gained from synthesizing new daguerreotypes in the laboratory. Admired for its astonishing clarity and holographic tones, each daguerreotype contains a unique material story about the process of its creation. Clues from the historical record that report improvements in the art are tested in practice to explicitly understand the cause for effects described in texts and observed in historic images. This approach raises awareness of the materiality of the daguerreotype as an image, and the materiality of the daguerreotype as a process. The structure of this thesis is determined by the techniques and materials of the daguerreotype in the order of practice related to improvements in speed, tone and spectral sensitivity, which were the prime motivation for advancements. Chapters are devoted to the silver plate, iodine sensitizing, halogen acceleration, and optics and their contribution toward image quality is revealed. The evolution of the lens is explained using some of the oldest cameras extant. Daguerre’s discovery of the latent image is presented as the result of tacit experience rather than fortunate accident. -
Lens Design I – Seminar 1
Y. Sekman, X. Lu, H. Gross Friedrich Schiller University Jena Institute of Applied Physics Albert-Einstein-Str 15 07745 Jena Lens Design I – Seminar 1 Exercise 1-1: Stair-mirror-setup (Homework) Setup a system with a stair mirror pair, which decenters an incoming collimated ray bundle with 10 mm diameter by 40 mm in the -y direction. The wavelength of the beam is = 632.8 nm. After this pair of mirrors, a decentered main objective lens with focal length f = 200 mm made of BK7 is located 25 mm below the optical axis and focusses the beam. a) Setup the system b) Generate layout drawings in 2D and in 3D. c) Calculate the beam cross section on the second mirror, what is the size of the pattern? d) Determine the optimal final sensor plane location. Calculate the spot of the focused beam. Discuss the shape of this pattern. Exercise 1-2: Symmetrical 4f-system Setup a telecentric 4f-imaging system with two identical plano-convex lenses made of BK7 with thickness d = 10 mm and approximate focal lengths f = 100 mm. The wavelength of the system is = 546.07 nm and the numerical aperture in the object space is NA = 0.2. The object has a diameter of 10 mm. a) If the setup is perfectly symmetrical, determine the layout and the spot diagram of the system. b) Optimize the image location. Why is the spot size improved? c) If the starting aperture is decreased, the system becomes more and more close to diffraction limited. What is the value of the NA to get a diffraction limited system on axis? Take in mind here, that a re-focussing might be necessary due to the lowered spherical aberrations, which depends on the aperture. -
Solution of Exercises Lecture Optical Design with Zemax for Phd – Part 8
2013-06-17 Prof. Herbert Gross Friedrich Schiller University Jena Institute of Applied Physics Albert-Einstein-Str 15 07745 Jena Solution of Exercises Lecture Optical design with Zemax for PhD – Part 8 8.1 Multi configuration, universal plot and slider Load a classical achromate with a focal length of f = 100 mm, no field and numerical aperture NA = 0.1 from one of the vendor catalogs. Fix the wavelength to = 546.07 nm. a) Add a thin mensicus shaped lens behind the system with an arteficial refractive index of n = 2 to enlarge the numerical aperture by a factor of 2 without introducing spherical aberration. To achieve this, the surfaces must be aplanatic and concentric. b) Now reduce the numerical aperture to a diameter of 2 mm and set a folding mirror in the front focal plane of the system. The incoming beam should be come from below and is deflected to the right side. c) Generate a multi-configuration system for a scan system by rotating the mirror. The first coordinate break angle can take the values -50°, -47.5°, -45°, -42.5° and -40°. The second coordinate break should be defined by a pick up with a resulting bending angle of the system axis of -90°. d) The chief ray of the scan system is telecentric in the paraxial approximation. Due to the residual aberrations of the system, there is a deviation from the telecentricity in the real system. Show this by a correponding universal plot. e) Show the variation of the spot in the image plane by using the slider. -
Opti 415/515
Opti 415/515 Introduction to Optical Systems 1 Copyright 2009, William P. Kuhn Optical Systems Manipulate light to form an image on a detector. Point source microscope Hubble telescope (NASA) 2 Copyright 2009, William P. Kuhn Fundamental System Requirements • Application / Performance – Field-of-view and resolution – Illumination: luminous, sunlit, … – Wavelength – Aperture size / transmittance – Polarization, – Coherence –… • Producibility: – Size, weight, environment, … – Production volume –Cost –… • Requirements are interdependent, and must be physically plausible: – May want more pixels at a faster frame rate than available detectors provide, – Specified detector and resolution requires a focal length and aperture larger than allowed package size. – Depth-focus may require F/# incompatible with resolution requirement. • Once a plausible set of performance requirements is established, then a set optical system specifications can be created. 3 Copyright 2009, William P. Kuhn Optical System Specifications First Order requirements Performance Requirements • Object distance __________ • MTF vs. FOV __________ • Image distance __________ • RMS wavefront __________ • F/number or NA __________ • Encircled energy __________ • Full field-of-view __________ • Distortion % __________ • Focal length __________ •Detector – Type Mechanical Requirements – Dimensions ____________ • Back focal dist. __________ – Pixel size ____________ • Length & diameter __________ – # of pixels ____________ • Total track __________ – Format ____________ • Wavelength