DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet NP8 Form 10-900* QMB Apprav* No, 10244019 (M6) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number ___ Page ___ SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 88002621 Date Listed: 11/23/88 Fort Spokane Military Reserve Lincoln Washington Property Name County State Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. ature (df. /the Keeper Date 6f Action Amended Items in Nomination: Item 8. Area of Significance add ARCHITECTURE as an area of significance Item 8. Cultural Affiliation add Salish and 19th Century Military Verified by phone with: Stephanie Toothman National Park Service Pacific Northwest Region DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NFS Form 10400 QMS No. 1024-0018 (R«v. S-66) 45 4 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Fort Spokane Mil itary Reserve other names/site number 2. Location street & number Route ?5 I _ | not for publication city, town Mile*? I yl vicinity state Washington code MF county | -i nrnl n code 043 zip code 3. Classification Ownership of Property C ategory of Property Number of Resources within Property _ private _ building(s) Contributing Noncontributing public-local X district 5 3 buildinas public-State site 97 sites _X public-Federal structure structures :~l object objects 33 3 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A listed in the National Register N/A 4. State/Federal Agency Certification / As/he designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this G0 nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [^l meets EH does not meet the National Register criteria. EH See continuation sheet. ?£, ^ ^A&^ rt^ i»IK?te£ Signature of certifying official ~ Date State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property EH meets EH does not meet the National Register criteria. 1 _ 1 See continuation sheet. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau x1 5. National Park Service Certification I, hereby, certify that this property is: 0 entered in the National Register. I I See continuation sheet. EH determined eligible for the National Register. I I See continuation sheet. EH determined not eligible for the National Register. I I removed from the National Register. EH other, (explain:) ___________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (enter categories from instructions) DEFENSE - military facility_____ RECREATION AND CULTURE - park EDUCATION - school___________ HEALTH CARE - sanitarium________ 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (enter categories from instructions) (enter categories from instructions) foundation Stone Classical Rpvival______ walls ___ Wood I at.e Virtnrian - Tt-alianat.p Brick flt.hpr- Military iratinn<; 1K7? roof _ Wood-Shingle (Note: Surviving Structures are Classical other Revival; Demolished Structures had many Describe present and historic physical appearance. Port Spokane: National Register Nominations Section 7: Physical Description The original 640 acres of the Fort Spokane Military Reserve lie on a high, sparsely-wooded plateau on the south side of the Spokane River, a mile north of its confluence with the Columbia River in northeastern Washington State. The boundaries of this nomination encompass the 88 acres that supported the primary structural complex of the fort and the and reservoir situated on the crest of the hill immediately south of the complex. The remaining 552 acres of open fields and ponderosa pine form a historic zone which is managed with reference to potential impact on the historic site. Of the forty-five original structures identified through historical research on the fort, five remain standing and 27 foundations are either visible or indicated by ground depressions. The original spring house and reservoir are outside of the boundaries because they lay on adjacent private land. If permission to include this property is received from the owner, this nomination will be amended. In 1880 General 0.0. Howard, military commander of the Department of the Columbia, appointed a survey team to explore the Northern Columbia Plateau to locate a site for a new post. The site identified by the team was strategically located near the confluence of the Spokane and Columbia Rivers, about 55 miles north of the projected route of the Northern Pacific Railroad. A sparsely-wooded level plateau some 400 feet above the river, with abundant fresh water supplies, open land for grazing, and timbered rolling hills close at hand, the site appeared well-suited for the new post. Within five months troops were living in tents at the site. In 1881 General Howard allocated funds to begin construction of the new post and several structures were built. It was not until 1882, however, after General Nelson Miles replaced Howard, that the War Department approved the new post and President Arthur signed the authorization establishing the Fort Spokane Military Reserve. The design of the fort complex was based on standard Army plans issued in 1872. There was both a strict element of symmetry in the design and axial layout of the grounds and a strong physical and symbolic hierarchy in the functional organization of the complex. The large parade ground, which provided the primary focus for the fort complex, was encircled and bisected by an elevated boardwalk. Used for daily walks, roll calls, marching and formal parades, the parade ground was open and relatively green, with tufts of bunch grass lending some relief from the enormous amounts of dust created by the fine, light soils of the area. A series of UQ See continuation sheet 8. Statement of Significance Certifying official has considered the significance of this property in relation to other properties: CH nationally > [XH statewide HH locally - ' ' Applicable National Register Criteria HTJA I IB HTIC ET"|D Criteria Considerations (Exceptions) |~]A I IB |~~lc I~~|D F~lE F~lF I |G Areas of Significance (enter categories from instructions) Period of Significance Significant Dates Military____________________ 1880-1899_________ ________ Native American________________ 1880-1929 Politics/Government____________ 1880-1929 Social History r______________ 1880-1929 ______________________________ Cultural Affiliation _______________________________ N/A______ Significant Person Architect/Builder U.S. Army State significance of property, and justify criteria, criteria considerations, and areas and periods of significance noted above. Section 8: Significance Fort Spokane Military Reserve was established in 1882 under an executive order signed by President Chester A. Arthur. Occupied by troops of the Department of the Columbia from 1880-1898, the fort complex subsequently served as an Indian Agency school and hospital. It is regionally significant under Criteria A and C as the site of the last of the frontier posts established in the Northwest, representative in design and construction of standard government specifications for army posts issued in 1872. The history of the fort's occupation represents a transitional phase in the relationship between the U.S. government and the native Salish tribes of the Northern Columbian Plateau. Initially established to contain the local tribes in the newly-created Colvilie and Moses (or Columbia) reservations, and to buffer them from emigrating white settlers, the fort later served as an integral part of the Indian Agency's attempt to acculturate these tribes. The site may also be eligible under Criteria D for the potential information on military and Indian Agency life that excavation of the fort's structural foundations may yield. Of the forty-five fort structures known from available historical documentation, five remain standing and twenty-seven foundations have been identified. The five surviving structures include examples of both brick and wood frame military construction, as well as the sophisticated engineering that supplied the fort with water. The physical organization of the fort is discernible from these structural artifacts and enhanced through an interpretive trail that follows the path of the original boardwalk that encircled the complex. The overall historic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Historical and Archaeological Study of the Nineteenth Century
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Summer 1-1-2012 A Historical and Archaeological Study of the Nineteenth Century Hudson's Bay Company Garden at Fort Vancouver: Focusing on Archaeological Field Methods and Microbotanical Analysis Elaine C. Dorset Portland State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Dorset, Elaine C., "A Historical and Archaeological Study of the Nineteenth Century Hudson's Bay Company Garden at Fort Vancouver: Focusing on Archaeological Field Methods and Microbotanical Analysis" (2012). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 869. 10.15760/etd.869 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Historical and Archaeological Study of the Nineteenth Century Hudson’s Bay Company Garden at Fort Vancouver: Focusing on Archaeological Field Methods and Microbotanical Analysis by Elaine C. Dorset A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology Thesis Committee: Kenneth M. Ames, Chair Douglas C. Wilson Virginia L. Butler Portland State University ©2012 ABSTRACT The Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC), a British fur-trading enterprise, created a large garden at Fort Vancouver, now in southwest Washington, in the early- to mid-19th century. This fort was the administrative headquarters for the HBC’s activities in western North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Currents and Undercurrents: an Administrative History of Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 476 001 SO 034 781 AUTHOR McKay, Kathryn L.; Renk, Nancy F. TITLE Currents and Undercurrents: An Administrative History of Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 2002-01-00 NOTE 589p. AVAILABLE FROM Lake Roosevelt Recreation Area, 1008 Crest Drive, Coulee Dam, WA 99116. Tel: 509-633-9441; Fax: 509-633-9332; Web site: http://www.nps.gov/ laro/adhi/adhi.htm. PUB TYPE Books (010) Historical Materials (060) Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF03/PC24 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS --- *Government Role; Higher Education; *Land Use; *Parks; Physical Geography; *Recreational Facilities; Rivers; Social Studies; United States History IDENTIFIERS Cultural Resources; Management Practices; National Park Service; Reservoirs ABSTRACT The 1,259-mile Columbia River flows out of Canada andacross eastern Washington state, forming the border between Washington andOregon. In 1941 the federal government dammed the Columbia River at the north endof Grand Coulee, creating a man-made reservoir named Lake Roosevelt that inundated homes, farms, and businesses, and disrupted the lives ofmany. Although Congress never enacted specific authorization to createa park, it passed generic legislation that gave the Park Service authorityat the National Recreation Area (NRA). Lake Roosevelt's shoreline totalsmore than 500 miles of cliffs and gentle slopes. The Lake Roosevelt NationalRecreation Area (LARO) was officially created in 1946. This historical study documents
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Spokane Military Reserve Lincoln Washington Property Name County State
    NP8 Form 10-900* QMB Apprav* No, 10244019 (M6) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number ___ Page ___ SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 88002621 Date Listed: 11/23/88 Fort Spokane Military Reserve Lincoln Washington Property Name County State Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. ature (df. /the Keeper Date 6f Action Amended Items in Nomination: Item 8. Area of Significance add ARCHITECTURE as an area of significance Item 8. Cultural Affiliation add Salish and 19th Century Military Verified by phone with: Stephanie Toothman National Park Service Pacific Northwest Region DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NFS Form 10400 QMS No. 1024-0018 (R«v. S-66) 45 4 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Site/Point of Interest Entry Cost
    Instructional Activity Two, Week of April 20th, 2020 ● For a video overview of this Instructional Task, see my Instructional Task website: Click here ​ ● Submit this document through Google Classroom (preferred) or email. ● In the spaces provided, identify if there is a cost to enter any of the sites you will visit (this will require online research, and you should research all 25 sites ​ before beginning your trip). How much does it cost to get in? For example, the ​ Museum of Flight costs $17. Many sites will have a cost; many will not. This exercise will also help you decide if you want to purchase a Discover Pass or an America the Beautiful Pass or both. You’ll have to weigh the cost vs. benefit. ● Pick your vehicle (see master instruction sheet, Washington State Road Trip ​ Project 2020), and whether or not you will tow a camper; remember that these ​ choices will affect your overall daily deductions, due to changes in overnight costs and gas mileage. ● My vehicle will be: _____________ LIST OF HISTORIC SITES AND POINTS OF INTEREST TO VISIT Historic Site/Point of Interest Entry Cost 1. Northwest Railway Museum, Snoqualmie, WA 2. Seattle, WA: a. Museum of Flight $17.00 b. Space Needle c. Fisherman’s Terminal d. Historic Ships Wharf e. T-Mobile Park 3. Port Townsend, WA 4. Fort Warden Historical Center, Port Townsend, WA 5. Fort Columbia, Chinook, WA 6. Mt. Rainier Railroad and Logging Museum, Elbe, WA 7. Fort Vancouver National Historic Site, Vancouver, WA 8. Bonneville Dam, Stevenson, WA 9. Whitman Mission, Walla Walla, WA 10.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Archaeological Potential for Proposed Upgrades to Riverfront Park, Spokane, Washington
    An Assessment of Archaeological Potential for Proposed Upgrades to Riverfront Park, Spokane, Washington By Ashley M. Morton, M.A., RPA Fort Walla Walla Museum, Heritage Research Services With Contributions by James B. Harrison, M.A. Spokane Tribe of Indians Preservation Program Prepared for the City of Spokane Parks and Recreation Department 808 West Spokane Falls Boulevard Spokane, WA 99201 Aerial View of the Riverfront Park area ca. 1929 (courtesy of Northwest Museum of Arts and Culture, Spokane, Washington) Final Technical Report 16-01 755 Myra Road Walla Walla, WA 99362 June 8, 2016 Table of Contents List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….iv List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………v Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..vi Chapter 1 Project Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 Native American Culture History in Eastern Washington ....................................................................... 4 Paleoarchaic Period (c.a. 11,000 to 8,000 B.P.) .................................................................................... 4 Early Archaic/Coyote Period (8,000 B.P. – 5,000 B.P.) .......................................................................... 4 Middle Archaic/ Salmon & Eagle Periods (5,000 B.P. – 2,000 B.P.) ..................................................... 4 Late Archaic/Turtle Period (2,000 B.P. – 280 B.P.) ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Astor. Early Okanogan History
    r • • • • • • • •• >, •• ... '. .', ." '.. ··, ,,:..,.....'. · . ~. .,.. .. \ asouvenir,g/ the one hundredth cmnivers<'2O' s/ thefrst selt/emer:t in the c§tafe.r }YdShin,!~on unaer fhe Omerlcanfla9'- On event w771ch occurred ..I the moufh5'the OJral1oyan River r!}eJ'f, 18'/1 I -~ - • ••• • • • • :: • • • .'.• •..• • • • • • • ... .' • • • • .. • • •••• •• •••• ••.. ..• • •• • ••• •• •.. .. .'. •• • • •..• • • • ••.. • • • • • .' •• • • ... ... • • • • • •• • .. ' : • • • .' • • • .. • • • . • • •.. 0° '0 •• • • • • • 0 • • • • • • • ·• .°• • • ... '.' JOHN JACOB ASTOR. EARLY OKANOGAN HISTORY :By WILLIAM C. BROWN. Gives an Account 0/ The First Coming 0/ the White Men to this Section .. an : . ..,:.:'. .... .d.' . .. ". ... ..'.,... '.:.'.'.' ...'. " '. ., .. ..' .., . Briefly Narrates the Eve!'t.s. J-..i:~~g. u~ tel: ~jl~rN~~qii~ ... ., . ., .'.. ' . .' .., the Ettraolil;hinenr '0/ .. ,., .. ." '" .,'. ... .,.' ... .. '. ..: , ... .... The First Settlemen( ~n: 'the" State 0/ Washington Under the American Flag .•,. r p,- ~ ' ......'~ • Cf"J'i,e \.. :'>. I,., ,,"_, [' , q 7. • .' • ••• • • • .' • •• • • • • • • • • .' • • • . .. • • • • ••• • • .' • • ••• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • ..• .' • • • • .. :: • '. • • ' .. .' • • • • • •• • • ..• ..• • • • • • ." • • • • • • .. • • • • • • .. • • •• • ...• • .. ..• .'. • • • •• • • • .. ••• • • ..• •..• • • • • • •'"• • • • • • • • .' • •• • • • • •• •• .. • • .. • •• • • .' • • • • •• • .. • ." ••• • • • • • •• ." •.. • •.'.• • •• • ..• ·.. : • • • • • •• • • • • • .. • • • • CHAPTER 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kettle Falls) This 81-Mile Long North-South Corridor Is Located in Eastern Washington Running Between Davenport and Kettle Falls
    Corridor Sketch Summary Printed at: 4:08 PM 3/19/2018 WSDOT's Corridor Sketch Initiative is a collaborative planning process with agency partners to identify performance gaps and select high-level strategies to address them on the 304 corridors statewide. This Corridor Sketch Summary acts as an executive summary for one corridor. Please review the User Guide for Corridor Sketch Summaries prior to using information on this corridor: SR 25: US 2 Jct (Davenport) to US 395 Jct (Kettle Falls) This 81-mile long north-south corridor is located in eastern Washington running between Davenport and Kettle Falls. The corridor passes through the unincorporated communities of Fruitland, Hunters, Cedonia, Gifford, Daisy, and Rice. The corridor’s character between the cities of Davenport and Kettle Falls is rural with few single-family residences within each community, whereas Kettle Falls and Davenport are high density suburban. Other land uses along the corridor include agriculture and open space residential, private/commercial forest and public forest, and commercial retail and services around the communities of Fruitland, Hunters, Cedonia, Gifford, Daisy and Rice. Terrain near Davenport is level, all other corridor terrain is rolling. The corridor runs adjacent to the Columbia River, crosses over multiple creeks, and travels over the Spokane River. Davenport Municipal Airport is located in Davenport and the Eastern Washington Gateway and Kettle Falls International Railway are located at the southern and northern endpoint respectively. Vegetation on the corridor is comprised of deciduous and coniferous trees, shrub land, and long grasses. Current Function State Route 25, also known as the Coulee Reservoir Highway, links Davenport and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources
    Section III Identification of Cultural Resources 21 Archaeological Sites and Traditional Cultural Properties. Mount Spokane has only occasionally been a destination for archaeologists. Early archaeological research efforts in Washington State focused on large coastal shell middens or, in the interior, broad river valleys where archaeological sites were more plentiful and easily accessed. Archaeological investigations in the Spokane vicinity did not begin in earnest until 1940 when the Columbia Basin Archaeological Survey undertook efforts along the Spokane River in association with construction of Grand Coulee Dam (Collier, Hudson, and Ford 1942). Later in 1950, Louis Caywood of the National Park Service began work at the historic site of Fort Spokane, northwest of Spokane. The fort was a fur trade post erected in 1812 by employees of the Pacific Fur Company, an American fur trade company owned by John Jacob Astor. In his four seasons of fieldwork at Fort Spokane, Caywood exposed most of the fort's palisades, several of its interior features, and a nearby boat house (Caywood 1954). Work resumed at Fort Spokane in 1962 and 1963 when Richard Daugherty, Washington State University, continued archaeological excavations within the fort’s stockade. Daugherty also sought to further delineate the location of a second trading post known as Spokane House. The Hudson’s Bay Company erected Spokane House in 1810, nearly two years before the Pacific Fur Company erected Fort Spokane. The two trading posts were located next to each other for protection and as symbols of their respective countries political presence in the region (Combs 1964). Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the Spokane Valley saw limited archaeological survey and excavation work.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section O
    O, Inspector (Fictitious character) O-erh-kʾun Ho (Mongolia) O-wee-kay-no Indians USE Inspector O (Fictitious character) USE Orhon River (Mongolia) USE Oowekeeno Indians O,O-dimethyl S-phthalimidomethyl phosphorodithioate O-erh-kʾun River (Mongolia) O-wen-kʻo (Tribe) USE Phosmet USE Orhon River (Mongolia) USE Evenki (Asian people) O., Ophelia (Fictitious character) O-erh-to-ssu Basin (China) O-wen-kʻo language USE Ophelia O. (Fictitious character) USE Ordos Desert (China) USE Evenki language O/100 (Bomber) O-erh-to-ssu Desert (China) Ō-yama (Kanagawa-ken, Japan) USE Handley Page Type O (Bomber) USE Ordos Desert (China) USE Ōyama (Kanagawa-ken, Japan) O/400 (Bomber) O family (Not Subd Geog) O2 Arena (London, England) USE Handley Page Type O (Bomber) Ó Flannabhra family UF North Greenwich Arena (London, England) O and M instructors USE Flannery family BT Arenas—England USE Orientation and mobility instructors O.H. Ivie Reservoir (Tex.) O2 Ranch (Tex.) Ó Briain family UF Ivie Reservoir (Tex.) BT Ranches—Texas USE O'Brien family Stacy Reservoir (Tex.) OA (Disease) Ó Broin family BT Reservoirs—Texas USE Osteoarthritis USE Burns family O Hine Hukatere (N.Z.) OA-14 (Amphibian plane) O.C. Fisher Dam (Tex.) USE Franz Josef Glacier/Kā Roimata o Hine USE Grumman Widgeon (Amphibian plane) BT Dams—Texas Hukatere (N.Z.) Oa language O.C. Fisher Lake (Tex.) O-kee-pa (Religious ceremony) USE Pamoa language UF Culbertson Deal Reservoir (Tex.) BT Mandan dance Oab Luang National Park (Thailand) San Angelo Lake (Tex.) Mandan Indians—Rites and ceremonies USE ʻUtthayān hǣng Chāt ʻŌ̜p Lūang (Thailand) San Angelo Reservoir (Tex.) O.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area
    25 135 251 North k e e r K Pierre C e D tt Lake Northport e le e p River 25 a Curlew d 130 C o r Deer Creek Summit r o e 0 5 10 Kilometers T 4600ft e NO Orient k 1402m R Cr T 05 10 Miles er H r eav B ve B 21 O Ri U 395 LD O E 125 n R io Lake Roosevelt n R a National Recreation Unpaved road Ranger station I i 29mi D b k G 47km Area m e E C e u r l r Boat launch e C o China Bar e C k 5 River mileage w Campground le 120 Mileages begin at Grand r u E China Bend Coulee Dam and continue Boat-in C G D upstream. Marina campsites I R 30mi North Gorge Barstow The National Park Service administers the waters 48km N COLVILLE O and shore lands of Lake Roosevelt outside the S Colville and Spokane Indian Reservations as Lake P South Fork B M Roosevelt National Recreation Area. Check shore oulder Cr O land signing for boundary locations. eek Snag Cove Curlew H 115 OKANOGAN Lake T k Mount Rogers e e 97 r 5557ft C Napoleon 1694m To Oroville NATIONAL Bridge Boyds Evans FOREST K e Kettle River t t l D e ea k Evans E d m ree R a i n C v e 20 G r te Summer r N pa Kamloops na NATIONAL Island Bo A 110 R S Marcus Marcus Island an po il REPUBLIC 25 River Columbia Mountain 105 6782ft St.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Trails Journal FOUR SUCCESSFUL OUTINGS in MAY
    NNoorrtthhwweesstt TTrraaiillss JJoouurrnnaall Newsletter and Journal of the Northwest Chapter of OCTA July 2003 President - Glenn Harrison Editor - Jim Tompkins http://www.nwocta.com FOUR SUCCESSFUL OUTINGS IN MAY AND JUNE SPOKANE AREA DISCOVERY TREK by Stanton Rickey Saturday evening we were treated to photo slides that Fur traders, missionaries, soldiers and settlers of the showed Tom Laidlaw, Richard and Lethene Parks slog- Spokane and Colville area were introduced to participants of ging across the muddy exposed Columbia River bottoms dur- the Northwest OCTA Outing on May 3 and 4. A lively cara- ing the drought of 2000. The presentation included migrations van of 11 autos was taken on a whirlwind tour of historic into Stevens County and activities of the Hudson's Bay Com- sites that portrayed the early settlement of the region. With pany at their Fort Colville, which was established in 1825. Gerri Williams as designated driver in the lead vehicle, tour Sunday, we visited the former site of the military Fort leader Lethene Parks kept up a running commentary on our Colville. In 1859, four companies of the US Army 9th Infan- CB radio connections, providing all with interesting, detailed try Regiment, were sent to construct 45 buildings there. The descriptions of early-day activities and functions at many his- American and British Boundary Commissions were located toric locations. Lethene also furnished each car with detailed there and soldiers were employed to survey the 49th Parallel local maps and a well documented, 50 page illustrated guide of Latitude and mark the new boundary with Canada (70 book that described places, events and names of organizations miles north) by cutting a wide swath through the timber.
    [Show full text]
  • Coulee Dam of Fort Spokane, the Road First Passes Through the NATIONAL RECREATION AREA • WASHINGTON Vast Rolling Wheatlands of Eastern Washington
    border. Highways follow the lake northeastward and offer a variety of scenic views. Going by way Coulee Dam of Fort Spokane, the road first passes through the NATIONAL RECREATION AREA • WASHINGTON vast rolling wheatlands of eastern Washington. Nearing the lake again, the road plunges into evergreen forests only to emerge on a high ter­ race overlooking the sparkling blue water. At Fort Spokane, a museum and self-guiding trails around the fort grounds tell the story of this colorful frontier period in American history. As the road winds northward, following the narrow valley between the Huckleberry and Kettle River Mountains, frequent glimpses of the lake can be had through ponderosa pine forest. Many once- are listed on the chart beside the map. prosperous farming communities are skirted by Approach log rafts with caution; cables extend modern transportation systems which have by­ between the rafts and tugboats. passed them. For a different type scenery, you can cross the lake on the Gifford Ferry (closed in Sailing is excellent as a breeze usually blows on winter) to Inchelium and continue north on the the lake from the surrounding hills. west side. Hunting and fishing are permitted within the na­ Another scenic drive you can take, after crossing tional recreation area as well as the surrounding the lake on the Keller Ferry, is to follow the San- country. State licenses are required. Among the poil River north to the old gold-mining town of big game are whitetail and mule deer and black Republic and then east over Sherman Pass. Along bear. Game birds include quail, chukar, mourn­ the way are many spots that are inviting for camp­ ing dove, pheasant, Canada goose, and brant.
    [Show full text]