DOCSLIB.ORG

An Honest Account of a Contemporary Jewish Publishing Odyssey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Honest Account of a Contemporary Jewish Publishing Odyssey An Honest Account of a Contemporary Jewish Publishing Odyssey In Your Anger, Please Mercifully Publish My Work: An Honest Account of a Contemporary Jewish Publishing Odyssey by Dovid Bashevkin[1] My recently published sefer, “Berogez Racheim Tizkor” (trans: “In your anger, you shall remember to have mercy”), whose title is based on the verse in Habbakuk 3:2 and traditionally recited each morning during Tahanun, really began as a tweet. In March 2014, I tweeted, “Considering writing a sefer entitled “Aveiros K’Hilchisa.” Considering writing a sefer entitled “Aveiros K’Hilchisa.” — D Bash (@DBashIdeas) March 5, 2014 The tweet was originally intended as a satire of the many seforim that have been published as halakhic digests of obscure practical issues in Judaism. If there could be an Ittush be-Halakhah (trans: “Sneezing in Jewish Law,” – an actual pamphlet shown to me by my dear friend and devoted consigliere Reb Menachem Butler), why not anAveiros “ K’Hilchisa”?[2] However, as often happens, what began as satire became a very real project. Following the passing of my Zaide, Mr. William Bashevkin, and last living grandparent, I thought it would be a fitting tribute to their memory to publish a work of Torah. Additionally, coupling sorrow with joy, my marriage this past year to Tova (née Flancbaum) gave me the inspiration to begin my relationship with a project of Torah scholarship. The sefer, which is a small collection of essays discussing halakhic issues related to sin and the path towards teshuva, is based upon shiurim I have had the opportunity to deliver periodically at the Young Israel of Lawrence Cedarhurst. With special appreciation to Mr. Joel Mael, who originally invited me and has been a continual source of guidance and counsel, the chevra who have participated in the shiurim are really my partners in this effort – without them, none of this would have been possible. Nonetheless, publishing a sefer has historically, and remains, an exercise marked with rabbinic ambivalence. As I note in the pesicha many great rabbinic figures looked suspiciously at the growing trend of publication. The Chatam Sofer in his Responsa Orach Chaim #208 famously considered those who publish works for their own self-promotion to be in violation of the prohibition of writing down Torah sh’Baal Peh, which, in his view, was only permissible if the work was truly written with pure intention.[3] Indeed, in a different response (vol. 6, #61), The Chatam Sofer laments the overwhelming increase in seforim being published. Why, then, publish a sefer? This question, I believe, has added import in contemporary society when the inclination for self-promotion and aggrandizement has seemingly never been stronger. So, then, is the publication of a sefer just an exercise in intellectual, albeit spiritual, vanity? This question has been addressed by many, including on the pages on the Seforim blog, most notably by Yaakov Rosenes in his post “Publish and Perish or Digital Death” (link). What follows are my experiences and brief thoughts on the issue of seforim publication. Firstly, as Rabbi Yaakov Levitz, a noted seforim distributor in Brooklyn, mentioned to me, the only thing that sells is “Soloveitchik, stories and pictures.”[4] No one should publish a sefer as a venture to make money. Aside from the questionable motive, it just won’t work. The only works that have a faint chance are those that will be purchased for Bar Mitzvah gifts. Other works that deal with more scholarly or intricate Talmudic issues will have a hard time even recouping the cost of publication.[5] Financial investments aside, I published this work for three reasons: Firstly, as I mentioned earlier, the sefer is dedicated to the memory of my grandparents and in honor of my marriage. Admittedly, these reasons are rather self-centered. I do, however, think they are relatively justifiable. While I grant that there are certainly less narcissistic ways of memorializing or honoring loved ones, I do think that sharing Torah, when possible, is appropriate. As Rabbi Hershel Schachter notes in the generous michtav bracha that he wrote to my sefer, the greatest honor one can accord their ancestors is sharing Torah. While the quality of the Torah may be questionable, I hope the honor it brings to their memory is just the same. Secondly, throughout the sefer, the works of Reb Zadok of Lublin, who I had the opportunity to study under Professor Yaakov Elman at Yeshiva University’s Bernard Revel Graduate School of Jewish Studies, and those of Rav Yitzchok Hutner both feature prominently.[6] I was first introduced to the works of Reb Zadok of Lublin by Rabbi Dr. Ari Bergmann of Lawrence, NY, and the door to Rav Yitzchok Hutner was kindly opened to me by Rabbi Ari Waxman of Yeshivat Shaalvim. Those familiar with these thinkers understand their relevance to the modern reader. Unfortunately, particularly Reb Zadok and the larger school of his rebbe, Rabbi Mordechai Leiner of Izbica, are often misunderstood and frequently misinterpreted.[7] My hope was to develop my own creative ideas within their school of thought, while still remaining loyal to the type of avodas hashem I think they hoped to engender. I don’t know if I was successful, but I hope the sefer continues to bring the much needed attention these thinkers deserve in contemporary times. Lastly, the Kotzker Rebbe famously remarked, “All that is thought should not be said, all that is said should not be written, all that is written should not be published, and all that is published should not be read.”[8] Undoubtedly, not everything in this work, or nearly any work, should have been published. In some ways I am comforted by the saying of Reb Chaim Brisker that even one valuable chiddush within an otherwise subpar work, can redeem an entire sefer, as Rav Hershel Schachter observes inNefesh Harav (1994), page 334. Parenthetically, in Rabbi Schachter’s introduction to his later work, Ginat Egoz (2006), he shared a wonderful anecdote that after mentioning the aforementioned saying of Reb Chaim during a shiur at Yeshivat Shaalvim, the Rosh Yeshiva approached him and (jokingly?) said that his entire shiur was worth hearing just because of that one story from Reb Chaim. No one will like, enjoy, or appreciate everything in a sefer, but I think the one insight that illuminates, explains or inspires another makes the entire work worth it. And, as often happens in the course of writing, the one who is inspired is the author himself. Rav Yaakov Yisrael Kanievsky, The Steipler Gaon, often advised writing personal Torah ideas as a means of cultivating a stronger relationship with Torah (for example, see his collected letters, Karyana de-Igarta #41). In fact, Yeshivat Chachmei Lublin had a special seder at the end of the day (at 10PM following a half-hour seder set to review the Rif) for students to write and develop their own chiddushei Torah.[9] We are willing to take risks in the pursuit of so many other goals, why not jeopardize our precision and flawlessness by sharing more published Torah? While I admire the Brisker allegiance to publishing perfection, I think many students have missed the opportunity to kindle an excitement for Torah in others and themselves by dwelling too much on their unworthiness in the endeavor. It only takes one chiddush or one idea to make it worthwhile. I knowingly may sound a bit too optimistic and/or forgiving when it comes to seforim publication and am glad to be guilty of such. In fact, it is the theme of my sefer. As I mentioned the title, Berogez Racheim Tizkor is said during Tachanun. In Tachanun this line is followed by the verse in Tehillim 123:3 which begins “Ki Hu Yada Yitzreinu.” Together these verses form a meaningful plea – that though we invoke God’s anger, we request his mercy for God knows our inner nature. Much of the work elaborates on that request. Namely, how the limitations of our free-will relate to our shortfalls and failures. The work discusses the halakhic and theological implications of sin and the often inevitability of failure. The underlying message, I hope, is one of comfort and optimism. Here are some of the topics discussed in the sefer: ● The status of apostates in Jewish law and thought; ● Do we always have the free will to avoid sin? And, assuming they do exist, is repentance required for such sins?; ● What should you wear to a sin?;[10] ● If spiritual struggle is redemptive, is it permissible to seek out situations of spiritual challenge?; ● The desultory appearances of the mysterious personality “Geniva” in Tractate Gittin; ● A contextual analysis of the Talmudic statement “A man doesn’t stand on words of Torah unless he fails in them,” (Gittin 43a); ● The halakhic import of granting someone forgiveness verbally, while internally still harboring internal resentment; ● An analysis of issues surrounding the concept of Averah Lishmah in contemporary times; Additionally, the sefer is book-ended by two essays related to Torah study in general, respectively considering the relationship between Blessings on the Study of Torah HaTorah and the Blessing of the Kohanim, and the role of Converts and Kohanim in the development of the Oral Law. Copies of Berogez Racheim Tizkor are available for purchase at Biegeleisen in Boro Park, and is currently available online here. I hope Berogez Racheim Tizkor is read with the same measure of mercy which, especially nowadays, is required of any sefer to be written. [1] David Bashevkin is the Director of Education at NCSY. He studied at Yeshivat Shaalvim, the Ner Israel Rabbinical College and at Yeshiva University, where he completed a Master’s degree in Polish Hassidut, focusing on the thought of Reb Zadok ha-Kohen of Lublin, under the guidance of Professor Yaakov Elman.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’S New Book Sin•A•Gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought
    Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’s new book Sin•a•gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’s new book Sin•a•gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought (Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2019) By Rabbi Yitzchok Oratz A Bashevkin-inspired Bio Blurb:[1] Rabbi Yitzchok Oratz is Rabbi of the Monmouth Torah Links community in Marlboro, NJ. His writings can be found in various rabbinic and popular journals, including Hakira, Ohr Yisroel, Nehoroy, Nitay Ne’emanim, and on Aish, Times of Israel, Torah Links, Seforim Blog, and elsewhere. His writings are rejected as often as they are accepted, and the four books he is currently working on will likely never see the light of day. “I’d rather laugh[2] with the sinners than cry with the saints; the sinners are much more fun.”[3] Fortunate is the man who follows not the advice of the wicked, nor stood in the path of the sinners, nor sat in the session of the scorners. (Psalms 1:1) One who hopes is always happy [and] without pain . hope keeps one alive . even one who has minimal good deeds . has hope . one who hopes, even if he enters Hell, he will be taken out . his hope is his purity, literally the Mikvah [4] of Yisroel . and this is the secret of repentance . (Ramchal, Derush ha-Kivuy) [5] Rabbi David Bashevkin is a man deeply steeped in sin.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’S New Book Sin•A•Gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought
    Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’s new book Sin•a•gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought Sinful Thoughts: Comments on Sin, Failure, Free Will, and Related Topics Based on David Bashevkin’s new book Sin•a•gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought (Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2019) By Rabbi Yitzchok Oratz A Bashevkin-inspired Bio Blurb:[1] Rabbi Yitzchok Oratz is Rabbi of the Monmouth Torah Links community in Marlboro, NJ. His writings can be found in various rabbinic and popular journals, including Hakira, Ohr Yisroel, Nehoroy, Nitay Ne’emanim, and on Aish, Times of Israel, Torah Links, Seforim Blog, and elsewhere. His writings are rejected as often as they are accepted, and the four books he is currently working on will likely never see the light of day. “I’d rather laugh[2] with the sinners than cry with the saints; the sinners are much more fun.”[3] Fortunate is the man who follows not the advice of the wicked, nor stood in the path of the sinners, nor sat in the session of the scorners. (Psalms 1:1) One who hopes is always happy [and] without pain . hope keeps one alive . even one who has minimal good deeds . has hope . one who hopes, even if he enters Hell, he will be taken out . his hope is his purity, literally the Mikvah [4] of Yisroel . and this is the secret of repentance . (Ramchal, Derush ha-Kivuy) [5] Rabbi David Bashevkin is a man deeply steeped in sin.
    [Show full text]
  • Revelation and Coercion: the Metaphor of the Forced Bride
    Revelation and Coercion: The metaphor of the forced bride Matan Torah 2 201823 is a painting by Alyse Radenovic Revelation, coercion, rape, the breaking of the Tablets, The power of the Oral law in Rabbinic hands, the subjection of the Divine to Torah Law, the implication for modern Jurisprudence. 1 The receiving of the Law and our celebration this weekend on the festival of Shavuot/Pentecost allows us to meditate on the theory of Jurisprudence that most fits the adjuring of our continued participation in Halacha and Mitzvot. Recent theories posit two different understandings of modern democratic systems of law. Austin posits the following: "The existence of law is one thing; its merit or demerit is another. Whether it be or be not is one enquiry; whether it be or be not conformable to an assumed standard, is a different enquiry. A law, which actually exists, is a law, though we happen to dislike it.” This statement is an expression of legal positivism because it asserts the separability of law and morals. Rabbi Lichtenstein has written about the possibility of a disconnect between Halacha and Morality. The second theory critiques this positivism as described by Hart: Laws are coercive orders or commands: That are issued by a sovereign or the sovereign’s authorized subordinates and apply within the sovereign’s territory. That are typically general and standing orders. That are backed by threats of coercion. It is generally believed that these threats are likely to be implemented when disobedience occurs. That are generally and habitually obeyed by the population. Hart’s central criticism of Austin’s theory is based on the fact that some statutes are unlike orders in that they do not require person to do things, but confer powers on them.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections of the David Cardozo Academy Think Tank
    Highlighting the activities of the David Cardozo Academy REFLECTIONS of the David Cardozo Academy Think Tank Thoughts to Ponder - 682 THE PERFECT TORAH VERSUS THE EVOLVING TORAH Thinking Globally Dear friends, Shalom u-vracha Living Jewishly It is a great pleasure to present to my readers the fi rst of several essays, written by my dear friend, student, colleague and scholar Yehudah DovBer Zirkind, based on my insights into Torah and Halacha and the discussion of these ideas within the David Cardozo Academy’s Think Tank. This time the discussion centers around the thoughts of the great Chassidic master Rabbi Mordechai Yosef Leiner of Izbica, (Poland, 1800-1854) known by his work: Mei Hashiloach, one the most unusual works ever written by a deeply ultra-orthodox master thinker. This work has infl uenced many other orthodox and non-orthodox scholars. It may also have inspired the famous halachist, and mystic, Chief Rabbi Avraham Yitzchak Kook (1865-1935). Rabbi Leiner’s thoughts are of the greatest importance for our days. It deals, among many other issues, with the numerous serious problems which emerge when our moral intuition confl icts with conventional Halacha; the question whether the Halacha is able to respond to the radical changes which have taken place in modern times. Is the conventional Halacha appropriate for all Jews when it is becomes clearer and clearer that human beings are by nature so radically diff erent and consequently unable to live by one and the same code? How can one standardized deeply religious law respond and
    [Show full text]
  • David Bashevkin JEWISH THOUGHT
    David Bashevkin Rabbi Bashevkin is the director of education for NCSY and an instructor at Yeshiva University. He recently published Sin·a·gogue: Sin and Failure in Jewish Thought. JEWISH THOUGHT: A PROCESS, NOT A TEXT am deeply uncomfortable with the term “Jewish thought.” Its sibling, “mahshava” and its more formal uncle, “Mahashevet Yisrael,” make me Ifeel no better. Allow me to ignore altogether their uneducated cousin “hashkafa,” a term so vacuous it barely deserves our attention. There are several reasons I do not like these terms. First of all, they divorce these texts from the larger body of Jewish literature from which they arise. Cordoning off ideas with philosophical import was not practiced by the Talmud, nor by Maimonides in his Mishne Torah, and the idea of doing so was explicitly lamented by Rabbi Shmuel Eidels, known as Maharsha, in the introduction to his talmudic commentary.1 “I regret my initial decision to divide up my commentary into two separate works,” he writes, “namely, one on aggada and one on halakha.” Classifi cations and specialization, while often necessary and commonly accepted in academic circles, strips the fl avor and richness away from Jewish ideas. Jewish thought divorced from halakhic and, more broadly, talmudic discourse, can feel like caging a wild animal. A tiger in a zoo may be majestic, but it is clearly not in its natural habitat. The context in which ideas emerge, Jewish or otherwise, is part of what nourishes their signifi cance. Philosophical ideas cannot be taken out of context. Whether it is a consideration of the broader talmudic context, the larger work in which they appear, or the historical framework—context matters.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I. Introduction: the Following Essay Is Offered to the Dear Reader to Help
    I. Introduction: The power point presentation offers a number of specific examples from Jewish Law, Jewish history, Biblical Exegesis, etc. to illustrate research strategies, techniques, and methodologies. The student can better learn how to conduct research using: (1) online catalogs of Judaica, (2) Judaica databases (i.e. Bar Ilan Responsa, Otzar HaHokmah, RAMBI , etc.], (3) digitized archival historical collections of Judaica (i.e. Cairo Geniza, JNUL illuminated Ketuboth, JTSA Wedding poems, etc.), (4) ebooks (i.e. HebrewBooks.org) and eReference Encyclopedias (i.e., Encyclopedia Talmudit via Bar Ilan, EJ, and JE), (5) Judaica websites (e.g., WebShas), (5) and some key print sources. The following essay is offered to the dear reader to help better understand the great gains we make as librarians by entering the online digital age, however at the same time still keeping in mind what we dare not loose in risking to liquidate the importance of our print collections and the types of Jewish learning innately and traditionally associate with the print medium. The paradox of this positioning on the vestibule of the cyber digital information age/revolution is formulated by my allusion to continental philosophies characterization of “The Question Concerning Technology” (Die Frage ueber Teknologie) in the phrase from Holderlin‟s poem, Patmos, cited by Heidegger: Wo die Gefahr ist wachst das Retende Auch!, Where the danger is there is also the saving power. II. Going Digital and Throwing out the print books? Critique of Cushing Academy’s liquidating print sources in the library and going automated totally digital online: Cushing Academy, a New England prep school, is one of the first schools in the country to abandon its books.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thought of Maharal of Prague J PH 1815 Dr. Brill Spring 2006 This
    The Thought of Maharal of Prague J PH 1815 Dr. Brill Spring 2006 This course will examine the thought of R. Yehudah Loew of Prague through extensive readings in his writings. Topics covered will include: associative method, reasons for the commandments, creation, Divine attributes, miracles, determinism, anthropology, ethical system, and messianism. We will discuss the relationship of his thought to philosophy, kabbalah, and Renaissance thought. The course will conclude with an analysis of the influence of his writings on eighteenth and nineteenth century Jewish thought. You may reach me by e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected] There will be a paper, and a final. You will be responsible for handouts given in class, please be sure to receive copies. The selections labeled as Reading: are mandatory for the final. All the required readings have numbers. Those listed as Suggested: are optional. We will adjust the reading list, as needed, based on class discussion. Basics: Please have available a set of Maharal's writings. You may use any edition. For finding topics in Maharal, the following are helpful. Avraham Kariv, Kitvei Maharal miPrag: Mivhar A useful topical arrangement but usually without citation to the source of the quote. DBS CD-Rom has Maharal. Moshe Yehiel Zuriel, Otzrot Maharal: maftehot inyanim… Bene Berak: 1985. I. Background A] Ashkenaz: Kupfer Thesis, Rationality, Polemics, and Kavod Theories Suggested: Readings: Frank Talmage "Sefer ha-Nissahon of R. Yom Tov Lipman Muehlhausen Apples of Gold Settings of Silver (1999) 319-356. Frank Talmage, "Angels, Anthems, and Anathemas: Aspects of Popular Religion in Fourteenth-Century Bohemian Judaism" in Talmage Volume II (1992) 13-20.
    [Show full text]
  • 0 the High Holyday Madrikh
    לְ(רַדַהמּ םַהָמְיִי ִי וֹנּר ָא םיִָ נּ THE HPCT-CAE@HOME HIGH HOLYDAY MANUAL שת פ א״ 5781 Rabbi Eliot Malomet The Officers and Board of Trustees of the Highland Park Conservative Temple – Congregation Anshe Emeth extends its warmest wishes to the Temple family for a Shanah Tovah u-Metukah! A sweet and healthy New Year! EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AUXILIARY ORGANIZATIONS Stuart Feinblatt, President Marcia Klioze, Sisterhood Barbara Parkoff, President-Elect Spencer Brooks, Men’s Club Carrie Mitnick, 1st Vice President Linda Diamond, 2nd Vice President PAST PRESIDENTS Philip Kibel, Treasurer Arthur Cohen Seth Gross, Financial Secretary Sheldon Freidenreich Susan Winter, Recording Secretary Edward Guttenplan Samuel Kamens Rabbi Eliot I. Malomet Zoltan Kemeny Linda Tondow, Executive Director Gertrude Klaus Carl Levy TRUSTEES Stuart Mitnick Susan Baron Gayle Brill Mittler Dave Cohen Fred Morgan Ira Cohen Mitchel Rosen Debbie Gerber Dr. Peter Schild Carey Glass Dr. Theodore Stahl Mindy Golden Roy Tanzman Phil Goldwasser Linda Tondow Simone Gore Eugene Gottlieb HONORARY TRUSTEE David Greenblatt Marlene Herman Ira Kizner Joy Kuchinsky Jerry Langer Sherri Lerner Steven Polinsky Joanne Rosenberg Terry Chazan Rothberg Michael Schoeffler Leonard Seader Daniel Shifrin Marlene Tarshish 2 ה״ב September 2020 Elul 5780 Dear Friends, When the pandemic struck six months ago, our lives changed. Worried for our health and safety, we were no longer able to gather together in large numbers to pray, study and live out the rhythms of Jewish life. This “Great Disruption” took a great toll on us as our lives ground to a halt. Some in our community lost loved ones due to Covid-19, others became sick and thankfully recovered.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Edition of Reb Zadok Ha-Kohen of Lublin’S Tzidkat Ha-Tzadik
    As The Kohen Exits The Sancta: A New Edition of Reb Zadok ha-Kohen of Lublin’s Tzidkat ha-Tzadik As The Kohen Exits The Sancta: A New Edition of Reb Zadok ha-Kohen of Lublin’s Tzidkat ha- Tzadik By Josh Rosenfeld Josh Rosenfeld is the Assistant Rabbi at Lincoln Square Synagogue and on the Judaic Studies Faculty at SAR High School. This is his fourth contribution to the Seforim Blog. Tzidkat ha-Tzaddik Commentary, Notes, & Excurses Ne’imot Netzah by R. Aharon Moseson 2 Vols. 532 + 564 pp. Arad: Makhon Ne’imot ha-Tzedek, 2015 “The Books of the ‘Kohen’, written by the very own hand of our Master, the Holy man of God, the Kohen Gadol, without peer, Reb Zadok ha-Kohen of Lublin, may his merit protect us… have taken an important place amongst the works of Jewish thought and Hasidut amongst the legions of those who seek God in every place. They serve as a magnet for all those who desire [to know] God, who find in it a veritable treasury of general instruction and guidance in the service of God – especially in the area of refining one’s character traits, and [his words] contain entire frameworks for understanding verses in Tanakh and sections of Rabbinic stories in the Talmud and Midrashic literature.” With these words, R. Aharon Moseson introduces his impressive new edition of what is arguably the central work of the “Kohen,” Reb Zadok ha-Kohen of Lublin (1823-1900), Tzidkat ha-Tzadik.[1] There is much already written on Reb Zadok and various different aspects of his thought, such that it would be redundant for me to recapitulate here,[2] although before we discuss this particular work and it’s advantages over previous editions, it behooves us to spend a moment on the book Tzidkat ha-Tzadik itself.
    [Show full text]
  • 2500 Years Ago Today Dr
    2500 Years Ago Today Dr. Rivkah Blau Noted Lecturer and Author Almost 2500 years ago Jews who came to Israel from the Babylonian exile observed the first Rosh Hashanah through bringing sacrifices. About fifty years later, when more Jews had come, the celebration of the yom tov centered on Ezra teaching Torah to a large assembly all morning, followed by everyone going home for a festive meal in the afternoon. The accounts of the two celebrations—the first in Ezra, Chapter 3, the second in Nehemiah, Chapter 8—and the contrast between them are relevant to Rosh Hashanah today. Challenges to Jewish life now that we may label “unprecedented” are actually parallel to what Ezra and Nehemiah faced then: a low level of Torah knowledge and observance; a high rate of intermarriage, even among the elite of the kohanim and the princes; missing genealogical records so that people did not know their ancestry. The opportunity to live in Israel was open to all Jews, but only a minority went on aliyah; they encountered opposition to restoring Jewish life in Israel and appeals to government authority in another country to stop their construction of a protective wall. According to Nehemiah 4.11 those who labored on the wall surrounding Jerusalem “worked with one hand, and with the other hand held a weapon.” Our generation is not the first to deal with these problems. Their generation faced an additional challenge: Haggai and Zekhariah are mentioned in Ezra- Nehemiah, but the end of the era of prophecy was approaching. Where would people turn when they could no longer go to a prophet to learn what God wants? The first group who came back to Israel understood that they were seeing the fulfillment of Jeremiah’s prophecy.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversations
    CONVERSATIONS Orthodoxy: Widening Perspectives Autumn 2020/5781 Issue 36 CONVERSATIONS CONTENTS In Honor of Rabbi Hayyim Angel, on His 25 Years of Rabbinic Service v RABBI MARC ANGEL Editor’s Introduction vii RABBI HAYYIM ANGEL How the Torah Broke with Ancient Political Thought 1 JOSHUA BERMAN Walking Humbly: A Brief Interpretive History of Micah 6:8 13 ERICA BROWN It’s in the Gene(alogy): Family, Storytelling, and Salvation 21 STUART HALPERN Hassidim and Academics Unite: The Significance of Aggadic Placement 30 YITZHAK BLAU Love the Ger: A Biblical Perspective 37 HAYYIM ANGEL Does the Gender Binary Still Exist in Halakha? 47 NECHAMA BARASH Four Spaces: Women’s Torah Study in American Modern Orthodoxy 68 RACHEL FRIEDMAN Three Short Essays 74 HAIM JACHTER The Yemima Method: An Israeli Psychological-Spiritual Approach 89 YAEL UNTERMAN You Shall Love Truth and Peace 103 DANIEL BOUSKILA Agnon’s Nobel Speech in Light of Psalm 137 108 JEFFREY SAKS Re-Empowering the American Synagogue: A Maslovian Perspective 118 EDWARD HOFFMAN Yearning for Shul: The Unique Status of Prayer in the Synagogue 125 NATHANIEL HELFGOT Halakha in Crisis Mode: Four Models of Adaptation 130 ARYEH KLAPPER Responsiveness as a Greatmaking Property 138 ANDREW ARKING Religious Communities and the Obligation for Inclusion 147 NATHAN WEISSLER SUBMISSION OF ARTICLES If you wish to submit an article to Conversations, please send the Senior Editor ([email protected]) or the Editor ([email protected]) a short description of the essay you plan to write. Articles should be written in a conversa- tional style and should be submitted typed, double spaced, as Word documents.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Lamentation in Jerusalem'*
    Rav Avraham Yitzhak Hakohen Kook ZTL ‘The Lamentation in Jerusalem’ * On the twentieth of Tammuz, 5664 (July 3,1904), Dr. Theodor Herzl (Benjamin Ze’ev) Herzl, founder of the Zionist movement, died at the tragically young age of forty-four. Rav Avraham Yitzhak Kook, the newly installed rabbi of the port city of Jaffa, was asked to participate in a memorial service to honor the departed leader. Rav Kook was placed in a difficult situation, for which there was no totally satisfactory solution. On the one hand, the Halakha is quite specific when it comes to those who have deviated from the norms of Torah: Whoever secedes from the way of the community, namely persons who throw off the yoke of commandments from upon their neck, and do not participate with the Jewish People in their observances, in honoring the festivals, and sitting in the synagogue and study house, but rather are free to themselves as the other nations, and so too the apostates and informers — for none of these persons does one mourn. Rather, their brothers and other relatives wear white (festive garments) and eat and drink, and make merry (Shulhan ‘Arukh, Yoreh De’ah 345:5). However one might lionize Herzl, there was no getting away from the fact that his lifestyle was that of an assimilated Jew far from observance of traditional Judaism. If one were to adhere literally to the passage in Shulhan ‘Arukh , the customary hesped or eulogy for the deceased would be out of the question. On the other hand, Rav Kook knew his flock.
    [Show full text]