Native Vegetation and Profitable Perennials to Ameliorate Salinity, and Enhance Biodiversity, Beneficial Insects and Pest Control

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Native Vegetation and Profitable Perennials to Ameliorate Salinity, and Enhance Biodiversity, Beneficial Insects and Pest Control Native Vegetation and Profitable Perennials to Ameliorate Salinity, and Enhance Biodiversity, Beneficial Insects and Pest Control A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation By Peter D Taverner and Glenys M Wood December 2006 RIRDC Publication No 06/129 RIRDC Project No SAR- 49A © 2006 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 1741513928 ISSN 1440-6845 Native Vegetation and profitable perennials to ameliorate salinity, and enhance biodiversity, beneficial insects and pest control Publication No. 06/129 Project No.SAR-49A. The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable industries. The information should not be relied upon for the purpose of a particular matter. Specialist and/or appropriate legal advice should be obtained before any action or decision is taken on the basis of any material in this document. The Commonwealth of Australia, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, the authors or contributors do not assume liability of any kind whatsoever resulting from any person's use or reliance upon the content of this document. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details Glenys M Wood Dr Peter Taverner Research Officer Principal Investigator SARDI SARDI Box 397 GPO Box 397 GPO Adelaide SA 2001 Adelaide SA 2001 Phone: 08 83039660 Phone: 08 83039660 Fax: 08 83039542 Fax: 08 83039542 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to RIRDC publishing this material in its edited form. RIRDC Contact Details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 2, 15 National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 02 6272 4819 Fax: 02 6272 5877 Email: [email protected]. Web: http://www.rirdc.gov.au Published in December 2006 Printed on environmentally friendly paper by Canprint ii Foreword Increasing pest pressure on the Northern Adelaide Plains (NAP) remains a real threat to horticulture in the region. One of the major problems is Tomato Spotted wilt virus (TSWV) that is vectored by three introduced pest thrips Western Flower Thrips (WFT) Frankliniella occidentalis, tomato thrips F. schultzei and onion thrips Thrips tabaci. Pest and virus damage has cost the industry up to $20million a year in lost crops and overheads. This study was conducted to determine whether indigenous perennial native species are less suitable hosts of invertebrate pests, particularly of WFT, than common weeds, when grown near horticulture on the NAP. This report evaluates invertebrate populations on different native plants and grasses for revegetation to replace weeds and suppress agricultural pest populations and disease on the NAP. Emphasis was placed on plant species that benefit Natural Resources Management (NRM), maintain populations of beneficial insects and have the potential to generate profit. Overall, the results suggest that a reduction in the key thrips species may be possible, but the replacement of weeds by native plants should not be left to chance. This study will assist landholders to make informed decisions about plant selection, which we collectively refer to as ‘revegetation by design’ and move towards improved integrated pest management (IPM) strategies. This project funded by Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC) was part of a larger program funded by Department of Transport and Regional Services Sustainable Regions Programme and Horticulture Australia Limited (HAL) with additional finance and in-kind provided by the Australian Government ENVIROFUND, City of Playford, Virginia Horticulture Centre and South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI). This report, an addition to RIRDC’s diverse range of over 1500 research publications, forms part of our Environment and Farm Management R&D program, which aims to support innovation in agriculture and the use of frontier technology to meet market demands for accredited sustainable production. Most of our publications are available for viewing, downloading or purchasing online through our website: • downloads at www.rirdc.gov.au/fullreports/index.html • purchases at www.rirdc.gov.au/eshop Peter O’Brien Managing Director Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation iii Acknowledgments Dr Nancy Schellhorn developed the original concepts, design and funding base for the project and guided the early stages as principal investigator. For taxonomy and field work, thanks to; Dr Richard Glatz, Mr Kym Perry, Mr Nathan Luke, Ms Susan Ivory, Ms Nola Lucas, Ms Karen Geyer and Dr Claire Stephens. In addition, to Ms Julie Lindner and Ms Judy Bellati who also made countless pollen Scanning Electron Microscopy images and Ms Sue Gerhig for data analysis. Thanks to Ms Dijana Jevremov, the project Communication Officer and consultants Mr Bill Doyle, Botanist and revegetation provider and Mr John Stafford, (Revegetation Services) for advice and direct seeding of native grasses. We would also like to thank members of the Revegetation by Design management team Tony Burfield, Domenic Cavallaro, Bill Doyle, John Stafford, Van Le, Kylie Robinson, Glenn Christie and Mike Redmond for their considerable knowledge, advice and practical support towards the delivery of the project on the Northern Adelaide Plains. Thank you also to the vegetable growers and their families Mr Thien Vu and Mr Minh Phan who kindly hosted two of our on-farm trials in Virginia. To the City of Playford revegetation staff, Green Corps and the Youth Conservation Council for planting native plants “ by design”. Special thanks go to Lawrence Mound and Murray Fletcher for their valued advice. To the SARDI Entomology Unit staff for a diverse range of support and to the team at Adelaide Microscopy, The University of Adelaide for SEM advice and assistance. iv Contents Foreword...............................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgments................................................................................................................iv Executive summary............................................................................................................viii 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................10 2. Abundance and diversity of pest and beneficial invertebrates on weeds and remnant native vegetation on the Northern Adelaide Plains, South Australia..............12 Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 12 Materials and Methods..................................................................................................................... 12 Study Area ................................................................................................................................... 12 Sampling...................................................................................................................................... 13 Statistical analysis........................................................................................................................ 14 Results.............................................................................................................................................. 15 Method 1...................................................................................................................................... 15 Pests............................................................................................................................................. 15 Beneficials ................................................................................................................................... 18 Sub sample for evaluation of parasitic wasps.............................................................................. 18 Discussion........................................................................................................................................ 20 Pest thrips .................................................................................................................................... 20 Beneficials ................................................................................................................................... 21 3.1. Survey of invertebrates on brassica weeds, native plants and native grasses in the Virginia horticulture area on the Northern Adelaide Plains......................................22 Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 22 Materials and methods ..................................................................................................................... 22 Study area .................................................................................................................................... 22 Sampling.....................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 2015-2021 Restoration of Tunbridge Gully
    CASE STUDY 040 PROJECT TIMELINE (DETAILED) Flora, Vegetation Studies – Proposed Weed and River and Tunbridge Gully Project area which found 2015-2021 Botanical Assessment of Hotham River Project was Juncus acutus was invading the project area. 2015 undertaken by Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd of the Hotham Stage 1 weed control was conducted March - April 2017 Species planted include: REGIONAL GOALS across the Tunbridge Gully Project area. Eucalyptus patens – Swan River Blackbutt Boddington District High School (BDHS) students grew Eucalyptus rudis – Flooded Gum P People seedlings for the July 2016 planting event. Eucalyptus wandoo – White Gum 2016 Melaleuca rhaphiophylla – Swamp Paperbark Total amount of seedlings planted: 350 B Melaleuca cuticularis – Saltwater Paperbark Biophysical Total number of volunteers: 24 Spraying for Juncus acutus – Glyphosate 360 (frog Hakea undulata – Baby leafed hakea friendly) and Wetter. All areas of the Hotham River and Hakea lissocarpha – Honey Bush Tunbridge Gully project were sprayed. Juncus pallidus – Pale rush Juncus pauciflorus – Loose Flower Rush Total amount of seedlings planted: 520 Juncus subsecundus – Finger rush Total number of volunteers - 66 2017 Melaleuca incana – Grey honey myrtle Species planted include: Melaleuca rhaphiophylla – Swamp paperbark Allocasuarina humilis – Dwarf Sheoak One monitoring transect established in May 2017 Calothamnus quadrifidus – One Sided Bottlebrush Photo monitoring points established Casuarina obesa – Swamp Sheoak Spraying for Juncus acutus – Glyphosate 360 (frog
    [Show full text]
  • Budawangia* an E-Newsletter for All Those Interested in the Native Plants of the Nsw South Coast
    BUDAWANGIA* AN E-NEWSLETTER FOR ALL THOSE INTERESTED IN THE NATIVE PLANTS OF THE NSW SOUTH COAST Contact: Dr Kevin Mills – [email protected] No. 48 - March 2016 Aims: To connect those interested in the native flora of the NSW South Coast, to share up to date information on the flora of the region and to broaden the appreciation of the region’s native plants. Editorial With continuing warmer oceans around Australia, El Nino has deepened during the last two months, and our dry conditions continued into mid-March when some reasonable rain finally came. We can only be thankful that the severe bushfires this season in other states have not occurred in our part of the world. Blackberry bushes were introduced for their fruit but now are regarded as noxious weeds. Many of us would remember going out in summer and collecting the fruit from thickets of Blackberry in paddocks and escarpment clearings. Native raspberries are closely related to the Blackberry, and there are four species in the region, although their fruits are not as an attractive culinary treat as the introduction. The native raspberries are the subject of the first piece in this newsletter, followed by items on a plant of the month, an eatable thistle, slime mould and a new weed for the region. The answers to last month’s challenge to identify rainforest tree bark are also provided as is a photo of a common local frog from a reader. Below is another note on a common Australian genus. Grevillea - named in 1809 after the English politician and founder of the London Horticultural Society Charles Francis Greville.
    [Show full text]
  • Salinity-Induced Changes in Anatomy, Stomatal Counts and Photosynthetic
    270 S. Afr. J. Bot. 1996,62(5): 270-276 Salinity. induced changes in anatomy, stomatal counts and photosynthetic rate of AtripZex semibaccata R. Br. A.J. de Villiers,* I. von Te ichman, M.W. van Rooyen and G.K. Theron Department of Botany. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002 Republic of South Africa Reaived J April 1996: reviJed 2 Jul.\' /996 Anatomical changes in the roots and leaves of Atriplex semibaccata R. Br., induced by salinity stress, as well as photosynthetic and stomatal response to salinity. were investigated. As salinity increased, decreases were observed in rool diameter and leaf size, as well as in the number of chloroplasts in the chlorenchyma and bundle sheath cells. Development of these two cell types was also inhibited. Net leaf photosynthetic rate and leaf stomatal conductance decreased with increasing salinity, while the interceJlular CO 2 concentration increased. 80th stomatal closure and inhibition of biochemical processes probably caused the reduced leaf photosynthetic rates. The stomatal indices suggest that the trend towards an increase in number of stomata per unit leaf area with an increase in salinity was not due to decreased epidermal cell size. Keywords: Anatomy, Atriplex semibaccata, Chenopodiaceae, photosynthetic rate, salinity, stomatal counts. "To whom correspondence should be addressed Introduction des. This knowledge could aid the selection of species suited for Atriptex semibaccata R. Br. is a ruderal perennial glycophytc and reclamation purposes on saline soils. The aim of this study was a member of the Chenopodiac~ae (Shomer-Ilan et at. 1981), a to determine the changes in root and leaf anatomy, photosyn­ family including many species which have a high sah wierancc thetic rate and stomatal counlS of Atriplex semibaccata, induced and many members of which, although growing on salt-laden by increased soil salinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitulo 3 Tesis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital.CSIC 1 Flowering phenology of invasive alien plant species compared to native 2 species in three mediterranean-type ecosystems 3 4 Oscar Godoy*1,4, David M. Richardson2, Fernando Valladares1,3 & Pilar Castro-Díez4 5 6 1 Laboratorio Internacional de Cambio Global (Linc-Global). Instituto de los Recursos 7 Naturales, Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales. CSIC. Serrano 115 dpdo E-28006 8 Madrid Spain. ! 9 2 Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch 10 University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa. 11 3 Departamento de Biología y Geología. Área de Biodiversidad & Conservación, 12 Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, ESCET, Tulipán s/n E-28933, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain. 13 4 Departamento Interuniversitario de Ecología. Sección de Alcalá. Edificio de Ciencias. 14 Universidad de Alcalá, E-28871, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. 15 16 *Correspondence author: [email protected] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 1 Fenología de floración de las especies de plantas exóticas invasoras en 2 tres ecosistemas mediterráneos en comparación con las especies 3 nativas. 4 5 Resumen 6 • Antecedentes y Objetivos: La fenología de floración es un componente esencial 7 del éxito de las especies invasoras, ya que una elevada fecundidad incrementa su 8 potencial invasor. Por tanto, estudiamos la relación existente entre los patrones 9 de floración de las especies invasoras y nativas en tres regiones con clima 10 mediterráneo: California, España y la Región Sudafricana de El Cabo 11 • Métodos: 227 pares de especies invasoras-nativas fueron utilizados 12 • Resultados clave: Las especies invasoras tienen diferentes patrones de floración 13 en comparación con las especies nativas en las tres regiones.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgrath State Beach Plants 2/14/2005 7:53 PM Vascular Plants of Mcgrath State Beach, Ventura County, California by David L
    Vascular Plants of McGrath State Beach, Ventura County, California By David L. Magney Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Abronia maritima Red Sand-verbena PH Nyctaginaceae Abronia umbellata Beach Sand-verbena PH Nyctaginaceae Allenrolfea occidentalis Iodinebush S Chenopodiaceae Amaranthus albus * Prostrate Pigweed AH Amaranthaceae Amblyopappus pusillus Dwarf Coastweed PH Asteraceae Ambrosia chamissonis Beach-bur S Asteraceae Ambrosia psilostachya Western Ragweed PH Asteraceae Amsinckia spectabilis var. spectabilis Seaside Fiddleneck AH Boraginaceae Anagallis arvensis * Scarlet Pimpernel AH Primulaceae Anemopsis californica Yerba Mansa PH Saururaceae Apium graveolens * Wild Celery PH Apiaceae Artemisia biennis Biennial Wormwood BH Asteraceae Artemisia californica California Sagebrush S Asteraceae Artemisia douglasiana Douglas' Sagewort PH Asteraceae Artemisia dracunculus Wormwood PH Asteraceae Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata Big Sagebrush S Asteraceae Arundo donax * Giant Reed PG Poaceae Aster subulatus var. ligulatus Annual Water Aster AH Asteraceae Astragalus pycnostachyus ssp. lanosissimus Ventura Marsh Milkvetch PH Fabaceae Atriplex californica California Saltbush PH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex lentiformis ssp. breweri Big Saltbush S Chenopodiaceae Atriplex patula ssp. hastata Arrowleaf Saltbush AH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex patula Spear Saltbush AH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex semibaccata Australian Saltbush PH Chenopodiaceae Atriplex triangularis Spearscale AH Chenopodiaceae Avena barbata * Slender Oat AG Poaceae Avena fatua * Wild
    [Show full text]
  • Atriplex Cinerea
    Atriplex cinerea COMMON NAME Grey saltbush FAMILY Amaranthaceae AUTHORITY Atriplex cinerea Poir. FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS No ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Trees & Shrubs - Dicotyledons NVS CODE ATRCIN CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n = 54 Atriplex cinerea. Photographer: Tony Silbery CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | Threatened – Nationally Critical | Qualifiers: SO PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | Threatened – Nationally Critical | Qualifiers: SO 2004 | Non-resident Native – Coloniser BRIEF DESCRIPTION Low greyish shrub of open coastal areas. Leaves semi-fleshy, grey, narrow, with white flecks on surface. Twigs reddish, covered in fine grains. Flowers and fruit inconspicuous, in leaf bases. DISTRIBUTION Indigenous. New Zealand: South Island (Collected from Boulder Bank in Nelson in 1960 and DUrville Island in 1961, still present in the Waimea Estuary). Historically it occurred at Palliser Bay and Wellington. Also known from Australia, including Norfolk and Lord Howe Islands. HABITAT Coastal. On boulder beaches, within salt marshes, on barrier bar sand spits and shell banks. Atriplex cinerea at Waimea Inlet, Nelson. Photographer: Shannel Courtney FEATURES Sprawling, semi-erect, woody, heavily branched, leafy, dioecious or subdioecious shrub, forming mounds up to 1.5 × 4 m. Branchlets stout, rooting freely on contact with soil; stems at first ridged and angular, soon becoming terete and woody with age. All parts of young growth covered in a fine, scurfy, farinose pubescence; coalescing with age to form silvery white scurfy scales. Leaves 15–20 × 32–46 mm, linear-oblong, lanceolate, rarely weakly hastate, silvery grey, greyish white or occasionally pinkish grey, under surface with pale white, thickened midrib. Petioles short, 1–3 mm, stout, silvery white.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Native Plants Cheeseberry Leptecophylla Juniperina Coast Beardheath Or Native Currant Coast Daisybush Olearia Axillaris Coastal Wattle Acacia Longifolia Subsp
    Copperleaf Snowberry Gaultheria hispida Ants Delight Acrotriche serrulata Barilla or Grey Saltbush Atriplex cinerea Bidgee-widgee Acaena novae-zelandiae Bower Spinach Tetragonia implexicoma Cape Barren Tea Correa alba Copperleaf Snowberry Gaultheria hispida Running Postman Kennedia prostrata Woolly Teatree Leptospermum lanigerum Edible Native Plants Cheeseberry Leptecophylla juniperina Coast Beardheath or Native Currant Coast Daisybush Olearia axillaris Coastal Wattle Acacia longifolia subsp. sophorae Cranberry Heath Astroloma humifusum OF TASMANIA subsp. juniperina Yellow Everlastingbush Ozothamnus obcordatus Key PART OF PLANT USED Underground Leaves/Leaf Bases Flowers Fruit Part Creeping Strawberry Pine Cutting Grass Gahnia grandis Erect Currantbush Leptomeria drupacea Grasstree, yamina or Green Appleberry Billardiera mutabilis Microcachrys tetragona Geebung Persoonia spp. Yacca Xanthorrhoea australis Purple Appleberry Meristem/Bud Exudate/Sap Seeds PREPARATION AND USE Snack Process Cook Eat Raw Tea Sweet Drink Flavouring CAUTION Hazard / Toxin Harvest Kills Plant Heartberry Aristotelia peduncularis Kangaroo Apple Solanum laciniatum Leeklily Bulbine spp. Lemon-leaf Heathmyrtle Baeckea gunniana Macquarie Vine or Blue Flaxlily Dionella spp. River Mint Mentha australis Native Grape Muehlenbeckia spp. Manfern or lakri Dicksonia antarctica or Milkmaids Burchardia umbellata Mountain Pepper Tasmannia lanceolata Native Cherry Exocarpus cupressiformis Native Ivyleaf Violet Viola hederacea Native Raspberry Rubus pavifolius Cyathea ssp. Native Bluebell Wahlenbergia spp. More information Cautionary Notes This poster is only a guide to what’s potentially edible. - sance so be cautious. Consume any new or unfamiliar food in small quantities. Ensure fruits are fully ripe. Note it’s often best not to ingest seeds or pips. cultivation and contemporary use of our edible native plants is still an evolving art and science. Source plants for your garden from native plant nurseries.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraoe Plants for ( Fltiyation on Alkali Soils
    FORAOE PLANTS FOR ( FLTIYATION ON ALKALI SOILS. By JARED G. SMITH, Assistant Agrostologist. INTRODUCTION. When the excess of alkali in a soil rises to such a sum total that the cereals can not be grown, the best use to which the land can be put is the growth of forage. There is no crop, so far as known, which can be profitably grown on land that contains over 2 per cent of the combined alkalies within the first 2 inches of surface soil. Soils containing as much as 1 per cent of alkalies within the first 2 inches will not grow cereals, and the maximum for trees, vines, and root crops is much lower. There are extensive areas in the West which are thus excluded from the cate- gory of farming lands because of the excess of alkalies. Such lands are not necessarily barren, although they can not be profitably culti- vated. They are often covered by a rank growth of vegetation, indi- cating that there is an abundance of plant food in the soil, if only the plants are so tolerant of alkali as to be able to secure it. Many of the alkaii plants have considerable value as forage, and of these some few show special adaptation to the changed conditions which cultiva- tion brings. The crops which originated in humid regions will not grow on soils which are strongly impregnated with the alkalies, and so to meet the conditions one must either take the useful plants of the alkali regions of his own country or depend upon those which have been introduced from similar regions elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1770 Landscape of Botany Bay, the Plants Collected by Banks and Solander and Rehabilitation of Natural Vegetation at Kurnell
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main Backdrop to encounter: the 1770 landscape of Botany Bay, the plants collected by Banks and Solander and rehabilitation of natural vegetation at Kurnell Doug Benson1 and Georgina Eldershaw2 1Botanic Gardens Trust, Mrs Macquaries Rd Sydney 2000 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] 2Parks & Wildlife Division, Dept of Environment and Conservation (NSW), PO Box 375 Kurnell NSW 2231 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] Abstract: The first scientific observations on the flora of eastern Australia were made at Botany Bay in April–May 1770. We discuss the landscapes of Botany Bay and particularly of the historic landing place at Kurnell (lat 34˚ 00’ S, long 151˚ 13’ E) (about 16 km south of central Sydney), as described in the journals of Lieutenant James Cook and Joseph Banks on the Endeavour voyage in 1770. We list 132 plant species that were collected at Botany Bay by Banks and Daniel Solander, the first scientific collections of Australian flora. The list is based on a critical assessment of unpublished lists compiled by authors who had access to the collection of the British Museum (now Natural History Museum), together with species from material at National Herbarium of New South Wales that has not been previously available. The list includes Bidens pilosa which has been previously regarded as an introduced species. In 1770 the Europeans set foot on Aboriginal land of the Dharawal people. Since that time the landscape has been altered in response to a succession of different land-uses; farming and grazing, commemorative tree planting, parkland planting, and pleasure ground and tourist visitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species Identity and Richness Influence Microbial Respiration of Soil Microorganisms on Various Functional Groups in Northeastern Patagonia, Argentina
    Biodiversity International Journal Research Article Open Access Plant species identity and richness influence microbial respiration of soil microorganisms on various functional groups in northeastern Patagonia, Argentina Abstract Volume 2 Issue 2 - 2018 Studies on basal soil respiration (i.e., under undisturbed conditions) are very important because they can be used as indirect indicators of the biological activity Cardillo DS,1 Busso CA,1,2 Ambrosino ML,1,3 in those soils; this ecological process is recognized as the major source of carbon Torres YA,2,4 Ithurrart LS,1,2 Palomo R1 flux from the soil surface, and one of the crucial components of the carbon cycle in 1Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de terrestrial ecosystems. The objectives of this study were to determine the microbial la República Argentina (CONICET), Argentina respiration of soil microorganisms at various levels of plant species richness and 2Departamento de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional del Sur developmental morphology stages in various perennial grass (Nassella longiglumis, (UNS), Argentina 3 N. tenuis, Amelichloa ambigua), and herbaceous (Atriplex semibaccata) and woody Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Argentina (Larrea divaricata, Schinus fasciculatus) dicots grown in experimental plots during 4Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de 2013 and 2014. There were 54 experimental plots. On each of 6 blocks, there was a Buenos Aires (CIC), Argentina plot (1.25x1.25m) for each of the 6 species (monocultures) and one plot each having combinations of 2, 4 or 6 species. Six hundred and twenty nine plants were reserved to Correspondence: Carlos Busso, Agonomy Department, replace dead plants in the plots [629+1944 plants from the plots (54 plots x 36 plants National Council for Scientific and Technological Research of per plot)=2573 plants in total].
    [Show full text]
  • Calavera Plant List
    Calavera Preliminary Plant Checklist Note: This list is incomplete and only includes plants observed in May through August. *Indicates a non-native species. James Dillane June, 2008 CRYPTOGAMS SELAGINACEAE Spike-Moss Family Selaginella cinerascens Ashy Spike Moss POLYPODIACEAE Polypody Family Adiantum jordani California Maidenhair PTERIDACEAE Brake Fern Family Pentagramma triangularis ssp. viscosa Silverback Fern ANGIOSPERMAE (DICOTYLEDONES) AIZOACEAE Fig-Marigold Family Carpobrotus sp.* Iceplant ANACARDIACEAE Sumac Family Malosma laurina Laurel Sumac Rhus integrifolia Lemonadeberry Schinus molle* Peruvian Pepper Tree Toxicodendron diversilobum Poison Oak APIACEAE Carrot Family Apiastrum angustifolium Mock-Parsley/Wild Celery Apium graveolens* Celery Conium maculatum* Poison Hemlock Daucus pusillus Rattlesnake Weed Foeniculum vulgare* Fennel Sanicula crassicaulis Pacific Sanicle ASCLEPIADACEAE Milkweed Family Asclepias fascicularis Narrow-Leaf Milkweed Sarcostemma cynanchoides ssp. hartwegii Climbing Milkweed ASTERACEAE Sunflower Family Acourtia microcephala Sacapellote/Purple Heads Ambrosia psilostachya Ragweed Artemisia californica California Sage Artemisia douglasiana Douglas Mugwort Baccharis pilularis Coyote Brush Baccharis salicifolia Mulefat Brickellia californica California Brickellbush Carduus pycnocephalus* Italian Thistle Centauria melitensis* Tocalote, Star-thistle Chamomilla suaveolens* Pineapple Weed Chrysanthemum coronarium* Garland Chrysanthemum Cirsium occidentale var. californicum California Thistle Cirsium sp.* Thistle
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species Richness and Developmental Morphology Stage Influence Mycorrhizal Patagonia Plants Root Colonization1 D
    ISSN 1067-4136, Russian Journal of Ecology, 2018, Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 413–421. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2018. Plant Species Richness and Developmental Morphology Stage Influence Mycorrhizal Patagonia Plants Root Colonization1 D. S. Cardilloa, C.A. Bussob, c, *, **, M.L. Ambrosinoa, d, L.S. Ithurrarta, b, Y.A. Torresb, e, and R.I. Palomoc aConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina (CONICET), Pcia, Buenos Aires, 8000 Bahía Blanca Argentina bDepartamento de Agronomía-Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS), Pcia, Buenos Aires, 8000 Bahía Blanca Argentina cCERZOS–Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de la República Argentina (CONICET), Pcia, Buenos Aires, 8000 Bahía Blanca Argentina dFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Provincia de La Pampa, 6300 Santa Rosa Argentina eComisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CIC), Pcia, Buenos Aires, 8000 Bahía Blanca Argentina *e-mail: [email protected] **e-mail:[email protected] Received June 28, 2017 Abstract—The objectives of this study were to determine the percentage of root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi at various levels of plant species richness and developmental morphology stages in various perennial grass, and herbaceous and woody dicots species using experimental plots during 2013 and 2014. An auger was used to obtain six replicate root + soil samples at each sampling time on each of the study parameters. Roots were washed free of soil, and percentage AM was determined. The shrub Larrea divaricata was the species which showed the lowest percentage of colonization by AM at the vegetative developmental morphology stage at the monocultures and six-species-mixtures on the experimental plots.
    [Show full text]