DOCSLIB.ORG

A Tasmanian Saltmarsh Wetland Plants Checklist

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Tasmanian Saltmarsh Wetland Plants Checklist Plant Family Scientific names Common names Book Recorded Average Flowering (* - introduced; Page (present, Height Status # - listed as rare in TAS) No. doubtful) (in cm) (in flower TASMANIAN SALTMARSH WETLAND PLANTS or not) CHECKLIST SURVEY DETAILS Saltmarsh site name: Saltmarsh cluster name (bay, river etc.): Survey location details (landmarks etc.): Geo-location (lat, long or E, N): Recorders: Survey date: Start time: End time: SURVEY METHOD (PS) Point-based 2-ha Area Search (TS) Transect-based Fixed-Route Monitoring (IS) Incidental Search* *for IS please note if plants were recorded on nearby saltmarsh upland margins. Details of survey methods are available through contacts listed in the last page. Refer to A guide to the plants of Tasmanian saltmarsh wetlands (2014) for identification support. Site specific species list can be used as a starting point for monitoring the plants of particular saltmarsh sites by recording the presence and absence of species. This could be done through a ‘bio-blitz’ conducted during the warmer months (when most species are in flower and are easier to identify) once every few years. These data will help improve our understanding of the Statewide distribution of saltmarsh plants, their ecology and biogeography (relating distribution data to local and regional environmental factors). When these data are collected over a long term (over decades), they can also indicate species-range shifts that occur as a consequence of climate change. Typical cross-section of saltmarsh habitat in the coastal landscape. Plant Family Scientific names Common names Book Recorded Average Flowering Plant Family Scientific names Common names Book Recorded Average Flowering (* - introduced; Page (present, Height Status (* - introduced; Page (present, Height Status # - listed as rare in TAS) No.1 doubtful)2 (in cm)3 (in flower # - listed as rare in TAS) No. doubtful) (in cm) (in flower or not)4 or not) AIZOACEAE (PIGFACE FAMILY) CHENOPODIACEAE (GOOSEFOOT FAMILY) Carpobrotus rossii native pigface p.16 Atriplex cinerea grey saltbush p.28 Disphyma crassifolium roundleaf Atriplex paludosa marsh p.17 p.29 subsp. clavellatum pigface subsp. paludosa saltbush Tetragonia implexicoma bower spinach p.18 creeping Atriplex prostrata* p.30 orache Chenopodium glaucum pale goosefoot p.31 AMARANTHACEAE (AMARANTH FAMILY) Rhagodia candolleana coastal Hemichroa pentandra trailing saltstar p.19 p.31 subsp. candolleana saltbush thickhead Sarcocornia blackiana p.32 APIACEAE (CELERY FAMILY) glasswort Sarcocornia Apium prostratum beaded sea-celery p.20 quinqueflora subsp. p.33 subsp. prostratum glasswort quinqueflora Eryngium vesiculosum prickfoot p.21 southern jointed Suaeda australis p.34 Lilaeopsis polyantha p.21 seablite swampstalks shrubby Tecticornia arbuscula p.35 glasswort ASTERACEAE (DAISY FAMILY) Angianthus preissianus salt cupflower p.22 CONVULVULACEAE (BINDWEED FAMILY) Brachyscome graminea grass daisy p.22 narrowleaf Wilsonia backhousei p.36 Cotula coronopifolia* water buttons p.23 wilsonia Leptinella longipes coast buttons p.24 Wilsonia humilis# silky wilsonia p.37 Senecio spp. groundsel p.25 roundleaf Wilsonia rotundifolia# p.38 Vellereophyton white wilsonia p.25 dealbatum* cudweed CUSCUTACEAE (DODDER FAMILY) CAMPANULACEAE (BELLFLOWER FAMILY) Cuscuta tasmanica# golden dodder Lobelia anceps angled lobelia p.26 Lobelia irrigua salt pratia p.26 GOODENIACEAE (NATIVE-PRIMROSE FAMILY) shiny Selliera radicans p.43 CARYOPHYLLACEAE (STARWORT FAMILY) swampmat Spergularia spp. seaspurrey p.27 MALVACEAE (MALLOW FAMILY) candle 1 Please refer to A guide to the plants of Tasmanian saltmarsh wetlands (2014) for identification support. Lawrencia spicata p.44 2 Accuracy rating for individual observations saltmallow 3 Average estimate height of the species population (optional) 4 Species is in flower if one of the plants has an open flower (optional) 2 3 Plant Family Scientific names Common names Book Recorded Average Flowering Plant Family Scientific names Common names Book Recorded Average Flowering (* - introduced; Page (present, Height Status (* - introduced; Page (present, Height Status # - listed as rare in TAS) No. doubtful) (in cm) (in flower # - listed as rare in TAS) No. doubtful) (in cm) (in flower or not) or not) MYRTACEAE (MYRTLE FAMILY) JUNCACEAE (RUSH FAMILY) coast Juncus acutus* sharp rush p.58 Melaleuca ericifolia p.45 paperbark Juncus kraussii subsp. sea rush p.59 australiensis PLANTAGINACEAE (PLANTAIN FAMILY) slender JUNCAGINACEAE (WATERRIBBON FAMILY) Plantago coronopus buckshorn p.47 streaked subsp. coronopus* Triglochin striata p.60 plantain arrowgrass POACEAE (GRASS FAMILY) PLUMBAGINACEAE (LEADWORT FAMILY) coast # Austrostipa stipoides p.61 Limonium australe sea-lavender p.48 speargrass tufted Deschampsia cespitosa p.62 PRIMULACEAE (PRIMROSE FAMILY) hairgrass Samolus repens var. creeping australian p.49 Distichlis distichophylla p.63 repens brookweed saltgrass Festuca arundinacea* tall fescue p.64 SCROPHULARIACEAE (SNAPDRAGON FAMILY) Lachnagrostis spp. blowngrass p.65 creeping coast Mimulus repens p.50 Parapholis incurva* p.65 monkeyflower barbgrass Phragmites australis southern reed p.66 CENTROLEPIDACEAE (BRISTLEWORT FAMILY) Poa spp. tussockgrass p.67 Polypogon annual wiry p.67 Centrolepis polygyna p.54 monspeliensis* beardgrass bristlewort australian Puccinellia stricta p.68 saltmarshgrass CYPERACEAE (SEDGE FAMILY) common Spartina anglica* p.69 bare cordgrass Baumea juncea p.54 twigsedge Sporobolus virginicus salt couch p.70 knobby Ficinia nodosa p.55 Zoysia macrantha clubsedge prickly couch p.71 subsp. walshii chaffy Gahnia filum p.56 sawsedge RESTIONACEAE (CORDRUSH FAMILY) nodding Isolepis cernua p.57 coarse clubsedge Apodasmia brownii p.72 twinerush Schoenoplectus sharp p.57 pungens clubsedge TYPHACEAE (CUMBUNGI FAMILY) shiny Schoenus nitens p.58 Typha spp. cumbungi p.73 bogsedge 4 5 SALTMARSH VEGETATION TYPE INVASIVE SPECIES WITHIN THE SALTMARSH SPECIES COMPOSITION SPARTINA ANGLICA2 (COMMON CORDGRASS OR RICE GRASS) % ABUNDANCE AT SITE SALINE SEDGELAND/RUSHLAND (ARS) DESCRIPTION % ABUNDANCE AT SITE <5% 5-25% 25-50% >50% Juncus kraussii (sea rush) Spartina extent <5% 5-30% 30-70% >70% 100% Gahnia filum (chaffy sawsedge) Austrostipa stipoides (coast speargrass) Comments: Other rushes, sedges, grasses SUCCULENT SALINE HERBLAND (ASS) Sarcoconia spp. (glasswort/samphire) Tecticornia arbuscula (shrubby glasswort) OTHER WEEDS3 (EXCLUDING RICE GRASS) Other succulent hers and shrubs Bare ground % ABUNDANCE AT SITE Other woody shrubs, trees Comments: Weeds extent (in total) <5% 5-30% 30-70% >70% 100% NUMBER OF PLANTS/ COMMON NAME: SCIENTIFIC NAME: AREA OCCUPIED (IN M2) TASVEG Mapping Unit (see Fig. 1 below) Blackberry Rubus fruticosus SALINE SEDGELAND/ SUCCULENT SALINE OTHER Boneseed Chrysanthemoides monilifera RUSHLAND (ARS) % HERBLAND (ASS) % % Boxthorn Lycium ferocissimum Comments: Gorse Ulex europaeus Pampas grass Cortaderia spp. Radiata pine Pinus radiata Fig. 1. In Tasmania, saltmarshes are formally defined and mapped by two vegetation community types: succulent saltmarsh (ASS) and grassy saltmarsh (ARS). Sweet briar Rosa rubiginosa Sea spurge Euphorbia paralias Sharp rush Juncus acutus Spanish heath Erica lusitanica Succulent saltmarsh in North East River, Flinders Grassy saltmarsh in Scamander River on the east coast of Island, domniated by Shrubby Glasswort (Tecticornia Tasmania, dominated by Sea Rush (Juncus kraussii) and 2 Spartina is by far the most important weed to monitor in Tasmanian saltmarshes. arbuscula) and Beaded Glasswort (Sarcocornia Chaffy Sawsedge (Gahnia filum) with Beaded Glasswort 3 The weeds listed here are considered to be of importance for management intervention. quinqueflora) understorey. 6 7 Plant Family Scientific names Common names Book Recorded Average Flowering (* - introduced; Page (present, Height Status OTHER PLANTS # - listed as rare in TAS) No. doubtful) (in cm) (in flower or not) Scientific Names Recorded Average Height Flowering Status ADDITIONAL COMMENTS For rare (listed) species, estimate number of plants or area occupied (in m2) Contact: Vishnu Prahalad: Geography & Spatial Science Discipline, School of Land and Food, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Private Bag 78, Tasmania 7001 (03) 6226 7674 | [email protected] Emma Williams: Coastal Coordinator, NRM North, PO Box 1224 Launceston, Tasmania 7250 (03) 6333 7779 | [email protected] | www.nrmnorth.org.au SUPPORTED BY.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Budawangia* an E-Newsletter for All Those Interested in the Native Plants of the Nsw South Coast
    BUDAWANGIA* AN E-NEWSLETTER FOR ALL THOSE INTERESTED IN THE NATIVE PLANTS OF THE NSW SOUTH COAST Contact: Dr Kevin Mills – [email protected] No. 48 - March 2016 Aims: To connect those interested in the native flora of the NSW South Coast, to share up to date information on the flora of the region and to broaden the appreciation of the region’s native plants. Editorial With continuing warmer oceans around Australia, El Nino has deepened during the last two months, and our dry conditions continued into mid-March when some reasonable rain finally came. We can only be thankful that the severe bushfires this season in other states have not occurred in our part of the world. Blackberry bushes were introduced for their fruit but now are regarded as noxious weeds. Many of us would remember going out in summer and collecting the fruit from thickets of Blackberry in paddocks and escarpment clearings. Native raspberries are closely related to the Blackberry, and there are four species in the region, although their fruits are not as an attractive culinary treat as the introduction. The native raspberries are the subject of the first piece in this newsletter, followed by items on a plant of the month, an eatable thistle, slime mould and a new weed for the region. The answers to last month’s challenge to identify rainforest tree bark are also provided as is a photo of a common local frog from a reader. Below is another note on a common Australian genus. Grevillea - named in 1809 after the English politician and founder of the London Horticultural Society Charles Francis Greville.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Lacks Stem Succulents but Is It Depauperate in Plants With
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Australia lacks stem succulents but is it depauperate in plants with crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM)? 1,2 3 3 Joseph AM Holtum , Lillian P Hancock , Erika J Edwards , 4 5 6 Michael D Crisp , Darren M Crayn , Rowan Sage and 2 Klaus Winter In the flora of Australia, the driest vegetated continent, [1,2,3]. Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), a water- crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), the most water-use use efficient form of photosynthesis typically associated efficient form of photosynthesis, is documented in only 0.6% of with leaf and stem succulence, also appears poorly repre- native species. Most are epiphytes and only seven terrestrial. sented in Australia. If 6% of vascular plants worldwide However, much of Australia is unsurveyed, and carbon isotope exhibit CAM [4], Australia should host 1300 CAM signature, commonly used to assess photosynthetic pathway species [5]. At present CAM has been documented in diversity, does not distinguish between plants with low-levels of only 120 named species (Table 1). Most are epiphytes, a CAM and C3 plants. We provide the first census of CAM for the mere seven are terrestrial. Australian flora and suggest that the real frequency of CAM in the flora is double that currently known, with the number of Ellenberg [2] suggested that rainfall in arid Australia is too terrestrial CAM species probably 10-fold greater. Still unpredictable to support the massive water-storing suc- unresolved is the question why the large stem-succulent life — culent life-form found amongst cacti, agaves and form is absent from the native Australian flora even though euphorbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Smut Fungi (Ustilaginomycetes) of Restionaceae S. Lat
    MYCOLOGIA BALCANICA 3: 19–46 (2006) 19 Th e smut fungi (Ustilaginomycetes) of Restionaceae s. lat. Kálmán Vánky Herbarium Ustilaginales Vánky (H.U.V.), Gabriel-Biel-Str. 5, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) Received 2 October 2005 / Accepted 25 October 2005 Abstract. Smut fungi of Restionaceae s. lat. were studied. Th ey are classifi ed into two genera, Restiosporium and Websdanea. Problems of species delimitation in these smuts are discussed. In addition to the nine known smut fungi, thirteen new species are described and illustrated: Restiosporium anarthriae, R. apodasmiae, R. chaetanthi, R. desmocladii, R. eurychordae, R. fl exuosum, R. hypolaenae, R. lepyrodiae, R. pallentis, R. patei, R. proliferum, R. spathacei, and R. sphacelatum. Key words: new species, Restionaceae s. lat., Restiosporium, smut fungi, taxonomy, Websdanea Introduction and stained in 1 % aqueous uranyl acetate for 1 h in the dark. After fi ve washes in distilled water, the material was Th e monocotyledonous Restionaceae is a remarkable family dehydrated in acetone series, embedded in Spurr’s plastic, of Southern Hemisphere, evergreen, rush-like plants. Th ey and sectioned with a diamond knife. Semi-thin sections are concentrated mainly in SW Africa and in SW Australia. were stained with new fuchsin and crystal violet, mounted Th e c. 320 species of African Restionaceae, in 19 genera, were in ‘Entellan’ and studied in a light microscope. revised by Linder (1985, 1991). Th e 170 species of Australian Spore ball and spore morphology was studied using Restionaceae s. lat. were published by Meney & Pate (1999) a light microscope (LM) with an oil immersion lens at a in a beautifully illustrated monograph.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Risk Aquarium and Pond Plants
    Plant Identification Guide Low-risk aquarium and pond plants Planting these in your pond or aquarium is environmentally-friendly. Glossostigma elatinoides, image © Sonia Frimmel. One of the biggest threats to New Zealand’s waterbodies is the establishment and proliferation of weeds. The majority of New Zealand’s current aquatic weeds started out as aquarium and pond plants. To reduce the occurrence of new weeds becoming established in waterbodies this guide has been prepared to encourage the use of aquarium and pond plants that pose minimal risk to waterbodies. Guide prepared by Dr John Clayton, Paula Reeves, Paul Champion and Tracey Edwards, National Centre of Aquatic Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA with funding from the Department of Conservation. The guides will be updated on a regular basis and will be available on the NIWA website: www.niwa.co.nz/ncabb/tools. Key to plant life-forms Sprawling marginal plants. Grow across the ground and out over water. Pond plants Short turf-like plants. Grow in shallow water on the edges of ponds and foreground of aquariums. Includes very small plants (up to 2-3 cm in height). Most species can grow both submerged (usually more erect) and emergent. Pond and aquarium plants Tall emergent plants. Can grow in water depths up to 2 m deep depending on the species. Usually tall reed-like plants but sometimes with broad leaves. Ideal for deeper ponds. Pond plants Free floating plants. These plants grow on the water surface and are not anchored to banks or bottom substrates. Pond and aquarium plants Floating-leaved plants. Water lily-type plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Age of Australian Chenopodiaceae
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5 (2005) 59–80 www.elsevier.de/ode Origin and age of Australian Chenopodiaceae Gudrun Kadereita,Ã, DietrichGotzek b, Surrey Jacobsc, Helmut Freitagd aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Botanik und Botanischer Garten, Johannes Gutenberg-Universita¨t Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany bDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA cRoyal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Australia dArbeitsgruppe Systematik und Morphologie der Pflanzen, Universita¨t Kassel, D-34109 Kassel, Germany Received 20 May 2004; accepted 31 July 2004 Abstract We studied the age, origins, and possible routes of colonization of the Australian Chenopodiaceae. Using a previously published rbcL phylogeny of the Amaranthaceae–Chenopodiaceae alliance (Kadereit et al. 2003) and new ITS phylogenies of the Camphorosmeae and Salicornieae, we conclude that Australia has been reached in at least nine independent colonization events: four in the Chenopodioideae, two in the Salicornieae, and one each in the Camphorosmeae, Suaedeae, and Salsoleae. Where feasible, we used molecular clock estimates to date the ages of the respective lineages. The two oldest lineages both belong to the Chenopodioideae (Scleroblitum and Chenopodium sect. Orthosporum/Dysphania) and date to 42.2–26.0 and 16.1–9.9 Mya, respectively. Most lineages (Australian Camphorosmeae, the Halosarcia lineage in the Salicornieae, Sarcocornia, Chenopodium subg. Chenopodium/Rhagodia, and Atriplex) arrived in Australia during the late Miocene to Pliocene when aridification and increasing salinity changed the landscape of many parts of the continent. The Australian Camphorosmeae and Salicornieae diversified rapidly after their arrival. The molecular-clock results clearly reject the hypothesis of an autochthonous stock of Chenopodiaceae dating back to Gondwanan times.
    [Show full text]
  • Rvk-Diss Digi
    University of Groningen Of dwarves and giants van Klink, Roel IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van Klink, R. (2014). Of dwarves and giants: How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 01-10-2021 Of Dwarves and Giants How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes Roel van Klink This PhD-project was carried out at the Community and Conservation Ecology group, which is part of the Centre for Ecological and Environmental Studies of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Weed Species
    coastline Garden Plants that are Known to Become Serious Coastal Weeds SOUTH AUSTRALIAN COAST PROTECTION BOARD No 34 September 2003 GARDEN PLANTS THAT HAVE BECOME Vegetation communities that originally had a diverse SERIOUS COASTAL WEEDS structure are transformed to a simplified state where Sadly, our beautiful coastal environment is under threat one or several weeds dominate. Weeds aggressively from plants that are escaping from gardens and compete with native species for resources such as becoming serious coastal weeds. Garden escapees sunlight, nutrients, space, water, and pollinators. The account for some of the most damaging environmental regeneration of native plants is inhibited once weeds are weeds in Australia. Weeds are a major environmental established, causing biodiversity to be reduced. problem facing our coastline, threatening biodiversity and the preservation of native flora and fauna. This Furthermore, native animals and insects are significantly edition of Coastline addresses a selection of common affected by the loss of indigenous plants which they rely garden plants that are having significant impacts on our on for food, breeding and shelter. They are also affected coastal bushland. by exotic animals that prosper in response to altered conditions. WHAT ARE WEEDS? Weeds are plants that grow where they are not wanted. Weeds require costly management programs and divert In bushland they out compete native plants that are then resources from other coastal issues. They can modify excluded from their habitat. Weeds are not always from the soil and significantly alter dune landscapes. overseas but also include native plants from other regions in Australia. HOW ARE WEEDS INTRODUCED AND SPREAD? WEEDS INVADE OUR COASTLINE… Weeds are introduced into the natural environment in a Unfortunately, introduced species form a significant variety of ways.
    [Show full text]
  • N E W S L E T T E R
    N E W S L E T T E R PLANTS OF TASMANIA Nursery and Gardens 65 Hall St Ridgeway TAS 7054 Open 7 Days a week – 9 am to 5 pm Closed Christmas Day, Boxing Day and Good Friday Phone: (03) 6239 1583 Fax: (03) 6239 1106 Email: [email protected] Newsletter 24 Spring 2010 Website: www.potn.com.au Hello, and welcome to the spring newsletter for 2010! The calendar says the end of September, but it is blowing and snowing outside so it doesn’t feel quite like spring yet (or then again, maybe we should expect this in Hobart in Septem- ber!) Roll on warm sunny days and spring flowers! News from the Nursery This is the main propagation time in the nursery. In July, we start doing hundreds of punnets of cuttings, with the plant material largely coming from stock plants within the nursery. The cuttings then sit in a greenhouse for a few weeks or longer developing roots before being potted up into 75 round tubes and shifted out into a shade house to harden off. They are then moved out into our open storage area, and then finally into sales. In September we start on growing plants from seed. We either collect the seed ourselves from plants in the nursery or in the bush, or use a commercial seed collecting agency. After the seeds germinate the new plants are pricked out into square tubes, and then go through the same hardening off process as the cutting grown material. We are slowly making a few changes around the nursery – nothing major, but we’re developing new areas to make finding plants easier.
    [Show full text]
  • 5055 Publication Date 2018 Document Version Final Published Version Published in Peerj License CC by Link to Publication
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) A novel approach to study the morphology and chemistry of pollen in a phylogenetic context, applied to the halophytic taxon Nitraria L. (Nitrariaceae) Woutersen, A.; Jardine, P.E.; Bogotá-Angel, R.G.; Zhang, H.-X.; Silvestro, D.; Antonelli, A.; Gogna, E.; Erkens, R.H.J.; Gosling, W.D.; Dupont-Nivet, G.; Hoorn, C. DOI 10.7717/peerj.5055 Publication date 2018 Document Version Final published version Published in PeerJ License CC BY Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Woutersen, A., Jardine, P. E., Bogotá-Angel, R. G., Zhang, H-X., Silvestro, D., Antonelli, A., Gogna, E., Erkens, R. H. J., Gosling, W. D., Dupont-Nivet, G., & Hoorn, C. (2018). A novel approach to study the morphology and chemistry of pollen in a phylogenetic context, applied to the halophytic taxon Nitraria L. (Nitrariaceae). PeerJ, 6, [e5055]. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5055 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist Das Spermatophyta Do Estado De São Paulo, Brasil
    Biota Neotrop., vol. 11(Supl.1) Checklist das Spermatophyta do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil Maria das Graças Lapa Wanderley1,10, George John Shepherd2, Suzana Ehlin Martins1, Tiago Egger Moellwald Duque Estrada3, Rebeca Politano Romanini1, Ingrid Koch4, José Rubens Pirani5, Therezinha Sant’Anna Melhem1, Ana Maria Giulietti Harley6, Luiza Sumiko Kinoshita2, Mara Angelina Galvão Magenta7, Hilda Maria Longhi Wagner8, Fábio de Barros9, Lúcia Garcez Lohmann5, Maria do Carmo Estanislau do Amaral2, Inês Cordeiro1, Sonia Aragaki1, Rosângela Simão Bianchini1 & Gerleni Lopes Esteves1 1Núcleo de Pesquisa Herbário do Estado, Instituto de Botânica, CP 68041, CEP 04045-972, São Paulo, SP, Brasil 2Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP, CP 6109, CEP 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brasil 3Programa Biota/FAPESP, Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP, CP 6109, CEP 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brasil 4Universidade Federal de São Carlos – UFSCar, Rod. João Leme dos Santos, Km 110, SP-264, Itinga, CEP 18052-780, Sorocaba, SP, Brasil 5Departamento de Botânica – IBUSP, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, Rua do Matão, 277, CEP 05508-090, Cidade Universitária, Butantã, São Paulo, SP, Brasil 6Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana – UEFS, Av. Transnordestina, s/n, Novo Horizonte, CEP 44036-900, Feira de Santana, BA, Brasil 7Universidade Santa Cecília – UNISANTA, R. Dr. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, Boqueirão, CEP 11045-907,
    [Show full text]
  • Phragmites Australis
    Journal of Ecology 2017, 105, 1123–1162 doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12797 BIOLOGICAL FLORA OF THE BRITISH ISLES* No. 283 List Vasc. PI. Br. Isles (1992) no. 153, 64,1 Biological Flora of the British Isles: Phragmites australis Jasmin G. Packer†,1,2,3, Laura A. Meyerson4, Hana Skalov a5, Petr Pysek 5,6,7 and Christoph Kueffer3,7 1Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 2School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 3Institute of Integrative Biology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, CH-8092, Zurich,€ Switzerland; 4University of Rhode Island, Natural Resources Science, Kingston, RI 02881, USA; 5Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-25243, Pruhonice, Czech Republic; 6Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, CZ-12844, Prague 2, Czech Republic; and 7Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa Summary 1. This account presents comprehensive information on the biology of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. (P. communis Trin.; common reed) that is relevant to understanding its ecological char- acteristics and behaviour. The main topics are presented within the standard framework of the Biologi- cal Flora of the British Isles: distribution, habitat, communities, responses to biotic factors and to the abiotic environment, plant structure and physiology, phenology, floral and seed characters, herbivores and diseases, as well as history including invasive spread in other regions, and conservation. 2. Phragmites australis is a cosmopolitan species native to the British flora and widespread in lowland habitats throughout, from the Shetland archipelago to southern England.
    [Show full text]