DOCSLIB.ORG

Non Key Decision: Report to Cabinet Portfolio Member

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Non Key Decision: Report to Cabinet Portfolio Member NON KEY DECISION: REPORT TO CABINET PORTFOLIO MEMBER DECISION TO BE TAKEN BY: Councillor Mrs Frances Cartwright Economic Portfolio REPORT AUTHOR: Rachel Armstrong REPORT NO: PLA 735 DATE: 1st December 2008 SUBJECT OF Peterborough City Council; NON KEY Site Allocations DPD – Issues and Options DECISION: Consultation CORPORATE PRIORITY: QUALITY LIVING, QUALITY ORGANISATION CRIME AND DISORDER None applicable IMPLICATIONS: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION This report is publicly available on the Council’s ACT website www.southkesteven.gov.uk via the Local IMPLICATIONS: democracy link. INITIAL Carried out and Full impact assessment EQUALITY appended to report? required? IMPACT ASSESSMENT No – responsibility of No Peterborough City Council BACKGROUND PAPERS: Peterborough City Council Core Strategy Preferred Options May 2008 Peterborough City Council: Site Allocations DPD Issues and Options Oct/Nov 2008 http://consult.peterborough.gov.uk/ (1) PURPOSE OF REPORT To consider issues arising from Peterborough City Council’s current consultation on potential site allocations for inclusion within the Site Allocations Development Plan Document (DPD) which will form part of the City Council’s Local Development Framework (LDF). (2) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Corporate Head of Sustainable Communities be authorised to submit comments to Peterborough City Council raising concern about: the amount of land which is being considered for development in villages of Deeping Gate, identified as “Small Village”, and in Northborough identified as a “Limited Growth Village”. The amount of land being considered far exceeds that envisaged in the Peterborough Core Strategy and would compromise the Spatial Strategy set out within. They could also have serious implications for the provision of local services and infrastructure within South Kesteven. Possible loss of the current Gypsy and Traveller site on Norwood Land known as Paston Ridings. (3) REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION(S) Peterborough City Council’s Issues and Options Consultation document is the first formal consultation document for the Site Allocations DPD. It appears to include all sites which have been suggested to the City Council as possible allocations, except those which are under 0.3 ha, or which are located in the City Centre or which would be alternative urban extension sites (as these two will be considered in separate DPDs). No assessment appears to have been made about the suitability or developability of any of the sites included. It is likely that the majority of the sites included in this consultation will not be taken forward for consideration in the next stage of the preparation of the DPD. The emerging Peterborough Core Strategy sets out a spatial strategy which identifies those villages within close proximity to South Kesteven as either “Small Villages” or “Limited Growth Villages”. Small villages have been identified as requiring a total of 150 new dwellings across the 15 identified villages, over the plan period (to 2021). Small villages includes: Wothorpe; Pilsgate; Bainton; Etton; Maxey; Deeping Gate; and Peakirk, which are all located to the south of South Kesteven. A number of small sites have been identified in some of these villages which do not raise any strategic policy concerns. However, three separate sites have been identified in Deeping Gate. Site H125 Riverside, Deeping Gate is small in scale and represents infill development and, therefore, raises no policy concern (although it should be noted the site lies in or close to an area at risk of flooding). The other two sites MO10 and MO11 are identified for Mixed Use development and lie to the west of the B1524 just south of the Market Deeping Bridge. These sites comprise over 87 hectares in total, this would provide far in excess of the150 houses required across the 15 villages. Deeping Gate is located in close proximity to the town of Market Deeping and Deeping St James (known collectively as the Deepings). Any new residential development across the river (and district boundary) at Deeping Gate, will inevitably be seen as part of the Deepings, and residents will utilise existing services and facilities within the Deepings, which are already considered by many locally to be stretched. The allocation of either of these two large sites (MO10 and MO11) would be contrary to the City Council’s spatial strategy and could compromise the ability of local services and facilities within South Kesteven to meet increased demands. If Peterborough City were to pursue the allocation of either site, the District Council will need to discuss with them the cross boundary implications of any such allocation on local infrastructure and service provision within South Kesteven. Within “Limited Growth Villages” (of which eight are identified), it is expected that a total of 500 new homes will be identified. The village of Northborough to the south of the Deepings is identified as one of the eight growth villages. Eight potential sites are identified around the village (sites H107 and H109- H115). Together, these sites could deliver in the region of 900 new homes. Again this level of development is contrary to the spatial strategy identified in the Core Strategy, and would be totally inappropriate in this location. The District Council would, therefore, need to consider the implications of any thing other than a modest amount of development were proposed in this settlement. It should be noted that Peterborough City Council has consistently argued, at both a regional and local level, against additional residential development within South Kesteven at the Deepings. In so doing the City has argued that development here is unsustainable and would lead to increased levels of commuting to Peterborough. If Market Deeping in considered in this light then so too must Deeping Gate. Whilst South Kesteven District Council has consistently argued against Peterborough City’s stance on this issue, residential development in the Deepings has been severely restricted for the last ten years. Site HO34 identified within the document as a potential housing allocation is currently in use as a Gypsy and Travellers site. This is a large council run Gypsy and Traveller site. The City Council’s Core Strategy identifies that there is a need within the city to identify one or more additional Gypsy and Traveller site(s) to meet outstanding need. In light of this need it would be unacceptable to lose an existing provision without appropriate replacement pitches being provided elsewhere within the city. South Kesteven also has an outstanding need for additional Gypsy and Traveller pitches which it is seeking to address through the identification of one or more sites within the district. The loss of pitches in the north of Peterborough could exacerbate the level of need within South Kesteven. (4) COMMENTS OF THE CORPORATE HEAD OF FINANCE AND RESOURCES (SECTION 151 OFFICER) No specific financial comments to make. (5) COMMENTS OF THE MONITORING OFFICER The Council is a statutory consultee for neighbouring authorities, such as Peterborough City Council. As such it is able to comment on documents prepared as part of their emerging LDF where these contain issues which are of concern or objection to this council. The matters raised in this report are a concern to this Council for the reasons given. (6) OFFICER CONTACT Rachel Armstrong Senior Planning Policy Officer 01476 406469 [email protected] (7) DATE DECISION EFFECTIVE: If decision taken on 1st December date effective will be 10th December 2008 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The London Gazette, 13Th February 1986 2107
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 13TH FEBRUARY 1986 2107 SCHEDULE CITY OF GLOUCESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL District of Peterborough HIGHWAYS ACT 1980, SECTION 116 AND 12ra SCHEDULE Parishes of Clinton and Helpston Notice of Application to Stop Up Highway Clinton Road, Helpston, and Helpston Road, Glinton Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of (B1443), that length of footway commencing on the north Gloucester (hereinafter referred to as "the Council"), side of Helpston Road, Glinton, at a point 40 metres being a District Council for the purposes of section 2 of west of the junction with Lincoln Road and running in a the Local Government Act 1972, in exercise of the under- westerly direction along the north side of Helpston Road mentioned powers of the Gloucestershire County Council and Glinton Road to its junction with Maxey Road, (under arrangements made pursuant to section 101 of the Helpston. said Local Government Act), under section 116 of the 7th February 1986. (773) Highways Act 1980, intends to apply to the Gloucester City Magistrates' Court sitting at the Court House, Barbi- can Way, Gloucester, on Friday, 14th March 1986, at 2 CAMBRIDGESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL p.m., for an Order that certain lengths of the public high- ways in the City of Gloucester known as Second Avenue, HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 Third Avenue and Fourth Avenue and their associated foot- paths be stopped up on the ground that they are unneces- The Cambridgeshire County Council (Glinton and North- sary. borough By-Pass) A15 Classified Road (Side Roads and The effect of the said Order is shown on a plan which other Works) Order 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • PDFHS CD/Download Overview 100 Local War Memorials the CD Has Photographs of Almost 90% of the Memorials Plus Information on Their Current Location
    PDFHS CD/Download Overview 100 Local War Memorials The CD has photographs of almost 90% of the memorials plus information on their current location. The Memorials - listed in their pre-1970 counties: Cambridgeshire: Benwick; Coates; Stanground –Church & Lampass Lodge of Oddfellows; Thorney, Turves; Whittlesey; 1st/2nd Battalions. Cambridgeshire Regiment Huntingdonshire: Elton; Farcet; Fletton-Church, Ex-Servicemen Club, Phorpres Club, (New F) Baptist Chapel, (Old F) United Methodist Chapel; Gt Stukeley; Huntingdon-All Saints & County Police Force, Kings Ripton, Lt Stukeley, Orton Longueville, Orton Waterville, Stilton, Upwood with Gt Ravely, Waternewton, Woodston, Yaxley Lincolnshire: Barholm; Baston; Braceborough; Crowland (x2); Deeping St James; Greatford; Langtoft; Market Deeping; Tallington; Uffington; West Deeping: Wilsthorpe; Northamptonshire: Barnwell; Collyweston; Easton on the Hill; Fotheringhay; Lutton; Tansor; Yarwell City of Peterborough: Albert Place Boys School; All Saints; Baker Perkins, Broadway Cemetery; Boer War; Book of Remembrance; Boy Scouts; Central Park (Our Jimmy); Co-op; Deacon School; Eastfield Cemetery; General Post Office; Hand & Heart Public House; Jedburghs; King’s School: Longthorpe; Memorial Hospital (Roll of Honour); Museum; Newark; Park Rd Chapel; Paston; St Barnabas; St John the Baptist (Church & Boys School); St Mark’s; St Mary’s; St Paul’s; St Peter’s College; Salvation Army; Special Constabulary; Wentworth St Chapel; Werrington; Westgate Chapel Soke of Peterborough: Bainton with Ashton; Barnack; Castor; Etton; Eye; Glinton; Helpston; Marholm; Maxey with Deeping Gate; Newborough with Borough Fen; Northborough; Peakirk; Thornhaugh; Ufford; Wittering. Pearl Assurance National Memorial (relocated from London to Lynch Wood, Peterborough) Broadway Cemetery, Peterborough (£10) This CD contains a record and index of all the readable gravestones in the Broadway Cemetery, Peterborough.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Peterborough
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Peterborough Report to the Electoral Commission July 2002 THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2002 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 303 2 THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? 5 SUMMARY 7 1 INTRODUCTION 13 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 15 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 19 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 21 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 23 6 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 41 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Peterborough is inserted at the back of this report. THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 3 4 THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Northamptonshire Past and Present, No 61
    JOURNAL OF THE NORTHAMPTONSHIRE RECORD SOCIETY WOOTTON HALL PARK, NORTHAMPTON NN4 8BQ ORTHAMPTONSHIRE CONTENTS Page NPAST AND PRESENT Notes and News . 5 Number 61 (2008) Fact and/or Folklore? The Case for St Pega of Peakirk Avril Lumley Prior . 7 The Peterborough Chronicles Nicholas Karn and Edmund King . 17 Fermour vs Stokes of Warmington: A Case Before Lady Margaret Beaufort’s Council, c. 1490-1500 Alan Rogers . 30 Daventry’s Craft Companies 1574-1675 Colin Davenport . 42 George London at Castle Ashby Peter McKay . 56 Rushton Hall and its Parklands: A Multi-Layered Landscape Jenny Burt . 64 Politics in Late Victorian and Edwardian Northamptonshire John Adams . 78 The Wakerley Calciner Furnaces Jack Rodney Laundon . 86 Joan Wake and the Northamptonshire Record Society Sir Hereward Wake . 88 The Northamptonshire Reference Database Barry and Liz Taylor . 94 Book Reviews . 95 Obituary Notices . 102 Index . 103 Cover illustration: Courteenhall House built in 1791 by Sir William Wake, 9th Baronet. Samuel Saxon, architect, and Humphry Repton, landscape designer. Number 61 2008 £3.50 NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT PAST NORTHAMPTONSHIRE Northamptonshire Record Society NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT 2008 Number 61 CONTENTS Page Notes and News . 5 Fact and/or Folklore? The Case for St Pega of Peakirk . 7 Avril Lumley Prior The Peterborough Chronicles . 17 Nicholas Karn and Edmund King Fermour vs Stokes of Warmington: A Case Before Lady Margaret Beaufort’s Council, c.1490-1500 . 30 Alan Rogers Daventry’s Craft Companies 1574-1675 . 42 Colin Davenport George London at Castle Ashby . 56 Peter McKay Rushton Hall and its Parklands: A Multi-Layered Landscape .
    [Show full text]
  • DCLG Neighbourhood Planning and Local Planning Service Redesign and Capacity Building Fund: Report on Peterborough City Council’S Funding Award
    DCLG Neighbourhood Planning and Local Planning Service Redesign and Capacity Building fund: Report on Peterborough City Council’s funding award June 2016 Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Neighbourhood Plan Support ...................................................................... 1 3.0 Local Plan Support .................................................................................... 10 4.0 Conclusions .............................................................................................. 15 1.0 Introduction 1.1 In February 2016 the Department for Communities and Local Government awarded Peterborough City Council £30,000 from its ‘Neighbourhood Planning and Local Planning Service Redesign and Capacity Building’ fund. 1.2 Peterborough City Council (PCC) was awarded funding to ‘continue to directly support more districts, parishes and other local authorities with their plan making, both local and neighbourhood plans, via a trading arm’. 1.3 This report sets out how we at PCC have used the funding to support the delivery of Local and Neighbourhood Plans both within our local authority area and elsewhere. 2.0 Neighbourhood Plan Support 2.1 PCC’s Strategic Planning Team has delivered neighbourhood planning support to several parish councils within the Peterborough area. In addition, under service level agreements we have also directly supported parish and town councils within East Cambridgeshire and Fenland, and provided support
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Decision
    Appendix 1 Appeal Decision Site visit made on 14 August 2013 by George Arrowsmith BA, MCD, MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 24 September 2013 Appeal Ref: APP/J0540/A/13/2196127 Land to the rear of Firwood, First Drift, Wothorpe, Stamford. Lincolnshire, PE9 3JL • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. • The appeal is made by Kelland Developments against the decision of Peterborough City Council. • The application Ref 13/00087/FUL, dated 18 January 2013, was refused by notice dated 25 March 2013. • The development proposed is a detached house and replacement garage. Decision 1. The appeal is dismissed. Main Issue 2. The main issue is whether the proposed development would be detrimental to the character of this part of Wothorpe and to that of the nearby open countryside. Reasons 3. Wothorpe is an area of low density residential development set in mature grounds. As such it has a semi-rural character which shades easily into the open countryside surrounding the village. Because of its distinct character the village has been designated as a Special Character Area (SCA) in the Peterborough Site Allocations DPD. Policy SA19 in that document sets out specific criteria for assessing proposals for development in SCAs. The first of these criteria, which says that there should be no subdivision of gardens if this adversely affects the character of the area, is particularly relevant. 4. The officer’s report on the application describes the site and its surroundings as follows: “Wothorpe is a village of two streets, First Drift and Second Drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Peterborough Care and Support Services Directory 2017/18
    Peterborough Care and Support Services Directory 2017/18 Peterborough Cathedral The comprehensive guide to choosing and paying for care In association with www.carechoices.co.uk www.peterborough.gov.uk Delivering specialist elderly care in Peterborough Our homes are located in close proximity of each other and a very short distance away from Peterborough’s Central Park. Each Home has dedicated staff supported by an environment that includes the following • Total Quality Management (as recognised by ISO 9001 Award) NAPA (National Activity Providers Association) members Respite Care/Post–operative Care OPEN Residential Care, Nursing Care DOOR POLICY DEDICATED CARE Dementia Care, Continuing Health Care Including open viewings Committed well trained • staff with local and visiting! knowledge! For further information about our homes or facilities please contact either care home directly or alternatively contact our head office. Broadleigh Care Home Lavender House Care Home Park Vista Care Home The Maltings Care Home 213 Broadway 205 Broadway 15 Park Crescent Aldermans Drive Peterborough PE1 4DS Peterborough PE1 4DS Peterborough PE1 4DX Peterborough PE3 6AR Tel: 01733 561475 Tel: 01733 564979 Tel: 01733 555110 Tel: 01733 897733 Peterborough Care, 236 Eastfield Road, Peterborough PE1 4BD Tel: 01733 562328 • www.peterboroughcare.com • email: [email protected] Contents Areas covered by this Directory 4 Keeping healthy 27 Welcome from Peterborough City Council 4 Support for carers 30 Where do I start? 5 Essential information 33 Assessment and support 11 Listings: What support is available? 13 Care and support providers 50 Housing options and care homes 18 Care homes 53 Paying for your care 22 Care homes with nursing 55 Monitoring the quality of our services 25 Index 56 Keeping people safe 26 Peterborough City Council’s distribution of this publication does not constitute its support or recommendation of any of the products or services advertised or listed within.
    [Show full text]
  • Converted from C:\PCSPDF\PCS58930.TXT
    M197-8 PETERBOROUGH CITY COUNCIL ELECTED CANDIDATES PARISH COUNCIL ELECTION - 1ST MAY 2008 Area Candidates Party Address Parish of Bainton Christopher Norris Agnew Willowgate Cottage, Helpston Rd., Bainton, Stamford, PE9 3AH Zena Valerie Coles Resident of Ashton Plashetts, Bainton Green Rd, Ashton, Stamford, PE9 3BA Jane Louise Franks 5 St Marys Close, Bainton, Stamford, Lincs, PE9 3AN Judith Carol Morrice Resident of Bainton Parish Hambleton House, Barnack Road, Bainton, Stamford, PE9 3AE Andrew William Totten 7 Badinton Lane, Bainton, Stamford, PE9 3AU Parish of Barnack Edwin Charles Barker Electrical Contractor 1 Owen Close, Barnack, Stamford, Lincs, PE9 3EH Sheila Mary Berrill Retired Headteacher 2 Owen Close, Barnack, Stamford, Lincs., PE9 3EH Henry Charles Brassey Close House, Jack Haws Lane, Barnack, Stamford, PE9 3DY Ian Edward Burrows Dr Burrows Current Deputy Five Bar Gate, Main Street, Barnack, Chairman Lincolnshire, PE9 3DN Dorothy Ann Dolby Housewife Millroy, Main St, Barnack, Stamford, Lincs, PE9 3DN David Bruce Roxburgh Steeple Cottage, Main Street, Barnack, Stamford, PE9 3DN June Patricia Wollard The Old Mill House, Barnack, Near Stamford, Lincolnshire, PE9 3HA Parish of Eye, Eye Ward Stephen Anthony Booth 41 Hooney Road, Eye, Peterborough, Cambs, PE6 7YQ Richard Andrew Brown 14 Chancery Lane, Eye, Peterborough Thomas Gee Farmer 26 High Street, Eye, Peterborough, PE6 7UU Trevor David Hitchborn Director 5 Eastwell Court, Helpston, Peterborough, PE6 7DF Michael John Holmes 12 High Street, Eye, Peterborough, PE6 7UU Dale Malcolm
    [Show full text]
  • Peterborough
    Archaeological Investigations Project 2003 Field Evaluations Eastern Region PETERBOROUGH Peterborough 2/326 (C.71.O005) TL 19209830 PE1 1EL 130 BRIDGE STREET, PETERBOROUGH Archaeological Assessment of 130 Bridge Street, Peterborough Taylor, E Northampton : Northamptonshire Archaeology, 2003, 36pp, colour pls, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Northamptonshire Archaeology An archaeological evaluation was carried out on the site. A line of upright timbers set along the River Nene and into a infilled palaeochannel containing 13th century artefacts were identified. The timbers may have formed a protective structure for a bridgehead or a wharf. The timbers were sealed by 15th century deposits. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: MD, PM 2/327 (C.71.M001) TL 15689627 PE2 5EQ 21-27 CHERRY ORTON ROAD, ORTON WATERVILLE Land to the Rear of 21-27 Cherry Orton Road, Orton Waterville, Peterborough Adams, S Twickenham : AOC Archaeology Group, 2003, 25pp, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: AOC Archaeology Group Archaeological features were recorded in all five trenches. These consisted of several ditches, post holes and four pits spanning from at least the early Saxon period to the medieval period. Three post holes and a later contained early Saxon pottery. One narrow ditch may also belong to this period or slightly later. One pit and a ditch contained early medieval wares though the ditch also contained early Saxon sherds. Two further ditches, a ditch terminal and two gullies contained no dating evidence. The possible remains of an earthwork observed in trench two may also be relatively dated to pre or early Saxon. Some 19th-20th century disturbance occured in the form of a couple of pits, post holes and possible gravel quarrying.
    [Show full text]
  • Continued/… Telephone: 01733 453413 Email: [email protected] Case Officer: Mrs J Maclennan Our Ref: 18/02188
    Telephone: 01733 453413 Email: [email protected] Case Officer: Mrs J MacLennan Our Ref: 18/02188/FUL Planning Services Appeal Ref: APP/J0540/W/19/3230422 Sand Martin House Bittern Way Fletton Quays Clerk To The Parish Council Peterborough Glinton Parish Council PE2 8TY Sent by email: [email protected] Peterborough Direct: 01733 747474 9 October 2019 Dear Sir/Madam Planning Appeal An appeal has been made to the Secretary of State against Peterborough City Council’s decision to refuse to grant Planning Permission in respect of the following proposal. Description: Demolition of existing single storey dwelling and erection of 3 single storey dwellings Site Location: 24 Peakirk Road Glinton Peterborough PE6 7LT Appeal by: Mr James Siggee Start date: 7 October 2019 How the appeal will be dealt with The appeal will be dealt with by exchange of written statements to be submitted to the Planning Inspectorate by both the appellant and the Local Planning Authority. The procedure to be followed is set out in Part 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Appeals) (Written Representations Procedure) (England) Regulations 2009 Further information on the Appeals Process can be found on the Planning Portal’s website (http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/planning/appeals/guidance/guidanceontheappealprocess) Viewing details of the original decision and appeal Please go to www.peterborough.gov.uk/publicaccess to view the original decision notice, case officer’s report together with the plans and documents that formed the original application. The appeal application form is also available, this will include the basic details of the appeal as well as the appellant’s grounds for making the appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee
    P & EP Committee: 7 September 2010 ITEM NO 5.6 10/00872/FUL: THE HAVEN, SECOND DRIFT, WOTHORPE, STAMFORD ERECTION OF DWELLING WITH DETACHED GARAGE AND STUDIO ABOVE VALID: 24 JUNE 2010 APPLICANT: HEREWARD HOMES LTD AGENT: IPLAN REFERRED BY: CLLR OVER REASON: IMPACT ON NEIGHBOUR AMENITY, OVERDEVELOPMENT, IMPACT ON LOCAL SERVICES DEPARTURE: NO CASE OFFICER: LOUISE LEWIS TELEPHONE: 01733 454412 E-MAIL: [email protected] 1 SUMMARY/OUTLINE OF THE MAIN ISSUES The main considerations are: • The principle of development • Impact on the character of the area • Impact on the amenities of neighbours The Head of Planning Services recommends that the application is APPROVED. 2 PLANNING POLICY In order to comply with section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 decisions must be taken in accordance with the development plan policies set out below, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. Development Plan Policies Key policies highlighted below. DA1 Development shall be compatible with its surroundings create or reinforce a sense of place and not create an adverse visual impact. DA2 Development shall be satisfactorily accommodated on the site, not have an adverse affect on the character of the area and have no adverse impact on the amenities of occupiers of nearby properties. DA6 Tandem, backland and piecemeal development. H15 Development to be carried out at highest net residential density H16 Seeks residential development if the following amenities are provided to a satisfactory standard; daylight and natural sunlight, privacy in habitable rooms, noise attenuation and a convenient area of private garden or amenity space. T1 New development should provide safe and convenient access for all user groups and not unacceptably impact on the transportation network.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, December 19, 1882
    6452 THE LONDON GAZETTE, DECEMBER 19, 1882. the county of Northampton, as lies within the daries, that is to say, the drain known as Old following boundaries, that is. to say,. Harlestone Pepper Lake as far as the Boat on- the - north, Firs on the north, the Dallington and Harlestone the said drain to Powder Blue Bridge on the bridle-road on the east, Hensmans-lane, Porters- east, the said drain to Old House Bridge on the lane, and Sand-lane on the west, and Duston south, and Speechley's Drove and main-road as village on the south. far as Old House Bridge on the west. (11.) The whole of the parish of Hazclbeech, (4.) At Peakirk, in the Soke of Peter- in the county of Northampton. borough, comprised within the following boun- (12.).So much of the parish of Sulby, in the daries, that is to say, the Great Northern ioop- county of Northampton, as lies within the line from Fox Cover Crossing to Park House following boundaries, that is to say, the road Bridge on the east and south-east, the bridle- leading from the turnpike-road to Sibbertoft as road leading to Werrington as far as Fox Cover far as the coach-road leading to Sulby Hall on Crossing on the south-west, and Halfmoon bank the north, the reservoir at Sulby on the south, as far as the road leading from North Fen to the reservoir and the road leading from Welford Peakirk on the north. Bridge to the Sibbertoft turn on the west, and (5.) At Peterborough Common, in the Soke the coach-road to Sulby Hall on the east.
    [Show full text]