“The American History of a POTTER Family” Volume II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“The American History of a POTTER Family” Volume II “The American History of a POTTER Family” Volume II Chapter 2: *SAMUEL POTTER2 (ca. 1657 – 1714) Chapter 3: *THOMAS POTTER3 (1691 – 1753) Chapter 4: *ANTHONY POTTER4 (1724 – 1791) by *Wilburn Metcalf Potter10 (1946 - ? ) This book is dedicated to our 7X Great Grandmother *SUSANNAH NORTH MARTIN1 (1621 – 1692) who was tragically and wrongfully hanged as an accused witch on Gallows Hill in Salem on July 19, 1692 during the “Salem Witchcraft Hysteria of 1692” when twenty innocents sadly lost their lives. “The American History of a POTTER Family” VOLUME II Chapter 2: *SAMUEL POTTER2 (ca. 1657 - 1714) Chapter 3: *THOMAS POTTER (1691 – 1753) 3 Chapter 4: *ANTHONY POTTER4 (1724 – 1791) by *Wilburn Metcalf Potter10 (1946 - ? ) Volume II: *SAMUEL.CH2, *THOMAS.CH3, *ANTHONY.CH4 - POTTER Page 1 Copyright Wilburn Metcalf Potter, 2018 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. First Edition: April, 2018 Printed in the United States of America ISBN-10: 1642549053 ISBN-13: 9781642549058 Additional copies of this book can be purchased from: TheBookPatch.com 7048 E. Main Street Scottsdale, AZ 85251 (480) 941-8355 or (480) 773-4447 www.thebookpatch.com [email protected] Legend (1) Names preceded by an asterisk (*) are direct bloodline ancestors of the Author, *WILBURN METCALF POTTER10 (1946 - ? ). (2) Subscripts after a name indicate the American generation of the st individual. For example, the first (1 ) generation American is *ANTHONY POTTER1 (ca. 1628 – 1690). The Author, *WILBURN METCALF POTTER10 (1946 - ? ), is a tenth (10th) generation American. (3) Superscripts at the end of a sentence or paragraph designate sequential “End Notes” at the end of each chapter. (4) “G.S.” are the initials for Gravestone. Volume II: *SAMUEL.CH2, *THOMAS.CH3, *ANTHONY.CH4 - POTTER Page 2 Other books by *WILBURN METCALF POTTER10 (1946 - ? ): (1) “The Seaman’s Journals of Captain LEONARD SAMUEL GRANT (1812 – 1880)” ---- Pilot – U.S. Coast Survey and Pilot – U.S. Revenue Cutter Service; compiled by *WILBURN METCALF POTTER10 (1946 - ? ) – Great Great Grandson; Copyright Wilburn Metcalf Potter, 2014; First Edition: January, 2014; ISBN # 978-1-620-30899-8. [Available from: The Book Patch.com 7048 E. Main Street, Scottsdale, Arizona 85251; (480) 941-8355 or (480) 773-4447; www.thebookpatch.com; [email protected]] (2) “An Anthology of the Music of BERT POTTER Published from 1904 to 1917” – *ALBERT LINCOLN (BERT) POTTER8 (1874 – 1930), ragtime music composer and publisher; compiled by *WILBURN METCALF POTTER10 (1946 - ? ), Grandson; Copyright Wilburn Metcalf Potter, 2015; First Edition: July, 2015; ISBN # 978-0-578-16615-5. [Available from: 48 Hr Books th 2249 14 Street, S.W., Akron, Ohio 44314, (800) 231-0521; www.48HrBooks.com; [email protected]; minimum order quantity: 10 books.] (3) “The American History of a POTTER Family, Volume I: *ANTHONY POTTER1 (ca. 1628 – 1690), Puritan, the First American, and Ipswich Cultivator of Fruit for the years ca. 1285 – 1690” Genealogy by *WILBURN METCALF POTTER10 (1946 - ? ); Copyright Wilburn Metcalf Potter, 2017; First Edition: April, 2017; Printed in the United States of America; 360 pages; ISBN-10: 1946982229; ISBN-13: 9781946982223. [Available from: The Book Patch.com 7048 E. Main Street, Scottsdale, Arizona 85251; (480) 941-8355 or (480) 773-4447; www.thebookpatch.com; [email protected].] Volume II: *SAMUEL.CH2, *THOMAS.CH3, *ANTHONY.CH4 - POTTER Page 3 (4) “The American History of a POTTER Family, Volume VIII: Appendix “A”: *HANCOCK Pedigree, Appendix “B”: *HORE -*HOARE – *HORR Pedigree, Appendix “C”: *WIGHT Pedigree” Genealogy by *WILBURN METCALF POTTER10 (1946 - ? ); Copyright Wilburn Metcalf Potter, 2017; First Edition: August, 2017; Printed in the United States of America; 237 pages; ISBN-10: 194751993X; ISBN-13: 9781947519930. [Available from: The Book Patch.com 7048 E. Main Street, Scottsdale, Arizona 85251; (480) 941-8355 or (480) 773-4447; www.thebookpatch.com; [email protected].] (5) “The American History of a POTTER Family”, Volume IX: *CHILDS – *METCALF - *POTTER Genealogy by *WILBURN METCALF POTTER10 (1946 - ? ); Copyright Wilburn Metcalf Potter, 2016; First Edition: October, 2016; Printed in the United States of America; 308 pages; ISBN: 978-0-578-18538-5. [Available from: 48 Hr Books 2249 14th Street, S.W., Akron, Ohio 44314, (800) 231-0521; www.48HrBooks.com; [email protected]; minimum order quantity: 10 books.] Wilburn Metcalf (Bill) Potter (1946 - ? ) (October, 2017 photograph) Volume II: *SAMUEL.CH2, *THOMAS.CH3, *ANTHONY.CH4 - POTTER Page 4 “The American History of a POTTER Family” Volume II: *SAMUEL.CH2, *THOMAS.CH3, *ANTHONY.CH4 - *POTTER Genealogy Table of Contents Dedication: Pages: 6 – 13 Pedigree of *WILBURN METCALF POTTER10 (1946 - ? ) Pages: 14 – 17 Chapter 2: *SAMUEL POTTER2 (ca. 1657 – 1714) Genealogy Pages: 18 – 113 Chapter 3: *THOMAS POTTER3 (1691 – 1753) Genealogy Pages: 114 – 168 Chapter 4: *ANTHONY POTTER4 (1724 – 1791) Genealogy Pages: 169 – 269 POTTER Family History Series of Books: Pages: 270 - 271 Volume II: *SAMUEL.CH2, *THOMAS.CH3, *ANTHONY.CH4 - POTTER Page 5 Dedication This book is dedicated to the memory of our 7X Great Grandmother *SUSANNAH NORTH MARTIN1 (1621 - 1692) who was accused, tried, convicted, and sadly hanged for witchcraft during the infamous “Salem Witchcraft Hysteria of 1692.” 7X Great Grandmother *SUSANNAH NORTH MARTIN1 (1621 - 1692) was actually a very pious woman who was wrongfully executed for witchcraft during the infamous Salem witch trials of 1692. 7X Great Grandmother *SUSANNAH NORTH MARTIN1 (1621 - 1692) was the fourth daughter and youngest child of *RICHARD NORTH0 (ca. 1590 – 1667) and *JOAN BARTRAM NORTH0 (ca. 1590 – before 1630) of Olney, Buckinghamshire County, England. She was baptized on September 30, 1621 in Olney, Buckinghamshire County, England. Her birth mother died when she was a child. Her stepmother was named URSULA (?) NORTH0. About 1639, *RICHARD NORTH0 (ca. 1590 – 1667) immigrated with his family and settled first in Salisbury, Massachusetts. On August 11, 1646 at Salisbury, Massachusetts, *SUSANNAH NORTH (MARTIN)1 (1621 - 1692) married the widower, *GEORGE MARTIN1 (ca. 1618 – 1686), a blacksmith with whom she had eight (8) children including our 6X Great Grandmother *JANE MARTIN HADLEY2 (1656 - after 1704) who was also the 4X Great Grandfather of President CHESTER A. ARTHUR6 (1829 – 1886). In 1669, *SUSANNAH NORTH MARTIN1 (1621 - 1692) was, for the first time, formally accused of witchcraft in Amesbury, Massachusetts by adversarial neighbors named WILLIAM SARGENT JR1 and THOMAS SARGENT1. In response, 7X Great Grandfather *GEORGE MARTIN1 (ca. 1618 – 1686) sued the SARGENTs1 for two counts of slander against his wife, WILLIAM SARGENT JR1 for accusing her of being a witch, and THOMAS SARGENT1 for claiming one of her sons to be a bastard and another an “imp” (a witch’s familiar). *GEORGE MARTIN1 (ca. 1618 – 1686) eventually withdrew the second count. Unfortunately, however, the Court upheld the accusation of witchcraft but upon appeal, a higher Court later dismissed the witchcraft charge. By 1671, the MARTIN family was again in court dealing with the matter of URSULA (?) NORTH1’s estate, most of which she had left to her granddaughter, MARY JONES WINSLEY3. This time the Court sided against *GEORGE MARTIN1 and *SUSANNAH NORTH MARTIN1. 7X Great Grandfather *GEORGE MARTIN1 (ca. 1618 – 1686) died in 1686 leaving *SUSANNAH NORTH MARTIN1 (1621 - 1692) an impoverished widow. On Saturday, April 30, 1692, JONATHAN WALCOTT2 and Sergeant THOMAS PUTNAM JR2 (1653 - 1699) swore a complaint against our 7X Great Grandmother *SUSANNAH NORTH MARTIN1 (1621 - 1692) of Amesbury, Massachusetts for witchcraft. The complaint said: “Relating to high suspicion of sundry Volume II: *SAMUEL.CH2, *THOMAS.CH3, *ANTHONY.CH4 - POTTER Page 6 acts of Witchcraft donne or committed by her upon ye bodies of MARY WALCOT3, ABIGAIL WILLIAMS3, ANN PUTNAM (JR)3, and MERCY LEWIS3 of Salem Village or Farms whereby great hurt and damage hath been donne to ye bodies of said persons…etc.” The sixty-seven year old salty-tongued widow had been suspected of witchcraft by her neighbors in Amesbury and Salisbury for more than three decades, as far back as 1669. She had been called a witch for so long that she had come to relish the distinction. Long a legend in her home town of Amesbury, as a lightning rod attracts lightning, she was arrested on May 2nd, 1692 and brought to “Ingersoll’s Ordinary” (Inn and Tavern) in Salem Village (Danvers) for pre-trial examination. “Ingersoll’s Ordinary” was the Salem Village inn and tavern where accusations, hearings, examinations, judicial conferences, spectral stabbings, “circle girl” fits, and sentencing occurred during the tragic “Salem Witchcraft Hysteria 1692.” [Pre-Trial Examination of 7X Great Grandmother *SUSANNAH NORTH MARTIN1 (1621 – 1692) – May 2, 1692] At the preliminary trial for the crime of “Witchcraft and Sorcery” *SUSANNAH NORTH MARTIN1 (1621 - 1692) pled “not guilty.” The original court record has been lost, but her testimony was recorded by the witch-hunting Reverend COTTON MATHER2 (1663 – 1728). None of the accused witches was allowed to have legal counsel. Figure 1: Left: “The Ingersoll Ordinary (Inn & Tavern)” and right: “The Salem Village Meeting House” as they may have looked in 1692 during the “Salem Witchcraft Hysteria of 1692.” (Courtesy: Danvers Archival Center) *SUSANNAH NORTH MARTIN1’s (1621 - 1692) reputation
Recommended publications
  • All Hands Are Enjoined to Spin : Textile Production in Seventeenth-Century Massachusetts." (1996)
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1996 All hands are enjoined to spin : textile production in seventeenth- century Massachusetts. Susan M. Ouellette University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Ouellette, Susan M., "All hands are enjoined to spin : textile production in seventeenth-century Massachusetts." (1996). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 1224. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/1224 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UMASS/AMHERST c c: 315DLDb0133T[] i !3 ALL HANDS ARE ENJOINED TO SPIN: TEXTILE PRODUCTION IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MASSACHUSETTS A Dissertation Presented by SUSAN M. OUELLETTE Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 1996 History ALL HANDS ARE ENJOINED TO SPIN: TEXTILE PRODUCTION IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MASSACHUSETTS A Dissertation Presented by SUSAN M. OUELLETTE Approved as to style and content by: So Barry/ J . Levy^/ Chair c konJL WI_ Xa LaaAj Gerald McFarland, Member Neal Salisbury, Member Patricia Warner, Member Bruce Laurie, Department Head History (^Copyright by Susan Poland Ouellette 1996 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT ALL HANDS ARE ENJOINED TO SPIN: TEXTILE PRODUCTION IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MASSACHUSETTS FEBRUARY 1996 SUSAN M. OUELLETTE, B.A., STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK PLATTSBURGH M.A., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Barry J.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminalising Witchcraft
    A Creative Connect International Publication 19 CRIMINALISING WITCHCRAFT Written by Bhavya Sharma* & Utkarsh Jain** * 3rd year BA LLB, Institute of Law, Nirma University, Ahmedabad ** 3rd year BA LLB, Institute of Law, Nirma University, Ahmedabad INTRODUCTION Witchcraft as a term means the belief in, and practice of, magical skills and abilities that are able to be exercised by individuals and certain social groups. These are practiced by witches. Witch is an English word gender specific which is confined to women only. Witch is generally attributed to the individuals who through sheer malice, consciously or subconsciously, use magical power to inflict all type of evil on their fellow humans. They usually bring disease; destroy property and misfortune and causes death, without any provocation to satisfy their inherent craving. Some cultures in the Province of South Africa believe that all the misfortunes and deaths are either due to the punishments by ancestors or by the evil spirits or witches. It is found that majority of the people in the provinces believes in witchcraft and therefore the existence of witches. It is considered that some people are born as witches. In some culture in the African Provinces it is believed that a baby born should be thrown against a wall and if the baby clings to the wall, he or she would become a witch afterwards. Many animals are also considered to be associated with the practice of witchcraft such as owls, cats, snakes, bats, baboons, pole- carts. Some of the material articles related with witchcraft includes mirror, blades, brown bread, whirlwinds, traditional dishes, plates, saucers, traditional horns which are blown at nights, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Elizabeth Howe
    Walton 1 Claire Walton HIST 2090 29 November 2017 Final Paper A Pious Woman Condemned by Rumor, Church, and Court: The Case of Elizabeth Howe “Though shee wer condemned before men shee was Justefyed befor god”1 -Goody Safford Prior to the year 1682, Goody Elizabeth Howe enjoyed a reputation defined by piety, honesty, and neighborliness. Two distinct disputes in 1682 would come together ten years later during the Salem witch crisis to place Elizabeth’s life in mortal peril. A “faling [out]” between Samuel Perley and the Howes preceded fits suffered by Samuel’s daughter, who reportedly identified Elizabeth as her tormentor. Although ministerial accounts contested Elizabeth’s culpability, rumors spread and stained Elizabeth’s holy reputation. Her rejection from the Ipswich Church approximately two or three years later, informed by the rumor of witchcraft and other reports from neighbors, exacerbated suspicion, as those involved in the church’s decision attributed maleficium to Elizabeth.2 The second dispute occurred on June 14, 1682, the same year Samuel Perley’s daughter first reported afflictions. The Topsfield men, Thomas Baker, Jacob Towne, and John Howe, Elizabeth’s brother-in-law, challenged John Putnam of Salem Village over his claim to land along the Ipswich River. This dispute pitted the Howe family against the Putnam family, a driving force behind the Salem witch trials of 1692. Ultimately, Elizabeth’s reputation of witchcraft coupled with her relationship to John Howe and by extension association with the Putnam land dispute influenced her conviction as a witch. Although numerous individuals 1 Bernard Rosenthal, et al., eds., Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 341 (Hereafter RSWH).
    [Show full text]
  • Palgrave Historical Studies in Witchcraft and Magic Series Editors
    Palgrave Historical Studies in Witchcraft and Magic Series Editors: Jonathan Barry, Willem de Blécourt and Owen Davies The history of European witchcraft and magic continues to fascinate and challenge students and scholars. There is certainly no shortage of books on the subject. Several general surveys of the witch trials and numerous regional and micro studies have been published for an English-speaking readership. While the quality of publications on witchcraft has been high, some regions and topics have received less attention over the years. The aim of this series is to help illuminate these lesser known or little studied aspects of the history of witchcraft and magic. It will also encourage the development of a broader corpus of work in other related areas of magic and the supernatural, such as angels, devils, spirits, ghosts, folk healing and divination. To help further our understanding and interest in this wider history of beliefs and practices, the series will include research that looks beyond the usual focus on Western Europe and that also explores their relevance and influence from the medieval to the modern period. Titles include: Jonathan Barry WITCHCRAFT AND DEMONOLOGY IN SOUTH-WEST ENGLAND, 1640–1789 Jonathan Barry RAISING SPIRITS How a Conjuror’s Tale was Transmitted across the Enlightenment Edward Bever THE REALITIES OF WITCHCRAFT AND POPULAR MAGIC IN EARLY MODERN EUROPE Culture, Cognition and Everyday Life Ruth Bottigheimer MAGIC TALES AND FAIRY TALE MAGIC From Ancient Egypt to the Italian Renaissance Alison Butler VICTORIAN
    [Show full text]
  • Perjurium Maleficis: the Great Salem Scapegoat
    Perjurium Maleficis: The Great Salem Scapegoat by Alec Head The Salem Witch Trials, often heralded as a sign of a religious community delving too deep into superstition, were hardly so simple. While certainly influenced by religion, the trials drew upon numerous outside elements. Though accusations were supposedly based in a firm setting of religious tradition, an analysis of individual stories—such as those of Rebecca Nurse, John Alden, and George Burroughs—shows that the accused were often targeted based on a combination of either fitting the existing image of witches, personal feuds, or prior reputations. The Puritans of Salem considered themselves to be “God’s chosen people,” building a new land, a heaven on earth.1 As with many endeavors in the New World, the Puritans faced innumerable struggles and hardships; their path would never be an easy one. However, rather than accepting their hurdles through a secular perspective, the Puritans viewed matters through a theological lens to explain their difficulties. While other, non-Puritan colonies faced similar challenges, the Puritans took the unique stance that they lived in a “world of wonders,” in which God and Satan had hands in the daily lives of humanity.2 In effect, this led to desperate—eventually deadly— searches for scapegoats. Upon his arrival in Salem, Reverend Samuel Parris publicly insisted that the hardships were neither by chance nor mere human hand. After all, if they were God’s chosen people, any opposition must have been instigated by the devil.3 Satan would not simply content himself with individual attacks. Rather, Parris insisted, grand conspiracies were formed by diabolical forces to destroy all that the Puritans built.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of the Salem Village Witchcraft Trials : Illustrated by A
    iiifSj irjs . Elizabeth Howe's Trial Boston Medical Library 8 The Fenway to H to H Ex LlBRIS to H to H William Sturgis Bigelow to H to H to to Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Open Knowledge Commons and Harvard Medical School http://www.archive.org/details/shorthistoryofsaOOperl . f : II ' ^ sfti. : ; Sf^,x, )" &*% "X-':K -*. m - * -\., if SsL&SfT <gHfe'- w ^ 5? '•%•; ..^ II ,».-,< s «^~ « ; , 4 r. #"'?-« •^ I ^ 1 '3?<l» p : :«|/t * * ^ff .. 'fid p dji, %; * 'gliif *9 . A SHORT HISTORY OF THE Salem Village Witchcraft Trials ILLUSTRATED BT A Verbatim Report of the Trial of Mrs. Elizabeth Howe A MEMORIAL OF HER To dance with Lapland witches, while the lab'ring moon eclipses at their charms. —Paradise Lost, ii. 662 MAP AND HALF TONE ILLUSTRATIONS SALEM, MASS.: M. V. B. PERLEY, Publisher 1911 OPYBIGHT, 1911 By M. V. B. PERLEY Saeem, Mass. nJtrt^ BOSTON 1911 NOTICE Greater Salem, the province of Governors Conant and Endicott, is visited by thousands of sojourners yearly. They come to study the Quakers and the witches, to picture the manses of the latter and the stately mansions of Salem's commercial kings, and breathe the salubrious air of "old gray ocean." The witchcraft "delusion" is generally the first topic of inquiry, and the earnest desire of those people with notebook in hand to aid the memory in chronicling answers, suggested this monograph and urged its publication. There is another cogent reason: the popular knowledge is circumscribed and even that needs correcting. This short history meets that earnest desire; it gives the origin, growth, and death of the hideous monster; it gives dates, courts, and names of places, jurors, witnesses, and those hanged; it names and explains certain "men and things" that are concomitant to the trials, with which the reader may not be conversant and which are necessary to the proper setting of the trials in one's mind; it compasses the salient features of witchcraft history, so that the story of the 1692 "delusion" may be garnered and entertainingly rehearsed.
    [Show full text]
  • WITCHCRAFT in SALEM VILLAGE. Harmony So
    134 WITCHCRAFT IN SALEM VILLAGE. given was that certain changes be made in the records. Harmony could not be secured, how- ever, and Mr. Lawson withdrew in 1688. Fol- lowing him came Rev. Samuel Parris, who was ordained on Monday, Nov. 19, 1689. It is evi- dent, therefore, that from the calling of Mr. Bayley in 1672 to the ordination of Mr. Parris in 1689 there was wanting in the parish that harmony so essential to church prosperity. That the disagreements about the settlements of the different pastors and over the parish rec- ords affected the minds of the people after the witchcraft delusion appeared among them there is little doubt. That it was the cause of the first charges being made seems hardly probable. George Burroughs, on leaving Salem Village, returned to Casco, Maine, He remained there a long time, for he and others were there in 1690 when the settlement was raided by Indians. Burroughs then went to Wells, Maine, and preached a year or more. There he was living in peace and quietness when the messenger from Portsmouth came to arrest him, at the demand of the Salem magistrates, in 1692. After leav- ing Salem Village he had married a third wife, a woman who had been previously married and of her own for after had children ; Burroughs' death, when the Massachusetts colony granted compensation to his family, his children com- plained that this third Mrs. Burroughs took the KEV. GEOBGE BUBBOUGHS. 135 entire amount for herself and her children/ Mr. Burroughs was a small, black-haired, dark com- plexioned man, of quick passions and possessing great strength.® We shall see by the testimony to be quoted further on that most of the evi- dence against him consisted of marvellous tales of his great feats of strength.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: the Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: The Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered Susan Kay Ocksreider College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Law Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ocksreider, Susan Kay, "The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: The Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625278. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-7p31-h828 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SALEM WITCH TRIALS FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE; THE IMPORTANCE OF SPECTRAL EVIDENCE RECONSIDERED A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of Williams and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Susan K. Ocksreider 1984 ProQuest Number: 10626505 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10626505 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Bethia Harris 1748-1833
    THE ANCESTRY OF BETHIA HARRIS 1748-1833 WIFE OF DUDLEY WILDES OF TOPSFIELD MASSACHUSETTS BY WALTER GOODWIN DAVIS PORTLAND, MAINE THE SOUTHWORTH PRESS 1934 frro •~ 1•:-1 s-T1•:10 s II EAi>, <'o, D1wos I lo:\I 1•: oF (:11.1-:s ('11\n:s CONTENTS I. HARRIS, OF IPSWICH 3 II. HARRIS, OF IPSWICH, FROM IsLES oF SHOALS • . 35 III. MASON, OF CHELTENHAM, co. GLOUCESTER, ENG­ LAND 41 IV. LAKE, OF NoRTH BENFLEET, co. EssEx, ENGLAND 45 V. SANDELL, OF BASILDON, co. ESSEX, ENGLAND . 57 VI. READE, OF WicKFORD, co. EssEx, ENGLAND . 67 VII. CHURCH, OF RuNWELL, co. EssEx, ENGLAND • . 79 VIII. CooKE, OF PEBMARSH, co. EssEx, ENGLAND . 85 IX. SEAR.LE, OF IPSWICH AND ROWLEY . 95 X. COWES, OF IPSWICH . 101 XI. BERRY, OF IPSWICH 109 XII. JONES, OF IPSWICH . 113 XIII. BRADFORD, OF BEVERLY . 121 XIV. RAYMENT, OF BEVERLY • . 129 -xv. SCROGGS, OF LONDON, ENGLAND, AND SALEM • • 135 William Harris Thomas Harris Thomas Harris I I I John Lake John Harris John Lake --------I Elizabeth Sandell_ Martha Lake Edmund Reade John Harris Margaret Reade I Elizabeth Cooke William Searle _,:_::__Grace Searle I William Cowes John Harris Thomas Cowes Honor Lang Giles Cowes Mary Lux Elizabeth Cowes Bethia Harris Thomas Berry ~-~-Agnes Berry I Nathaniel Jones William Bradford Bethia Jones 1- ·--· George Rayment i , Rachel Bradford J·ohn Rayment I Rachel Rayment William Scroggs William Scruggs I , Rachel Prentice Rachel Scruggs I HARRIS, OF IPSWICH THE ANCESTRY OF BETHIA HARRIS HARRIS This account of the Harris family of Ipswich does not pre­ tend to be an exhaustive genealogy even of the generations with which it deals.
    [Show full text]
  • Radicals, Conservatives, and the Salem Witchcraft Crisis
    Griffiths 1 RADICALS, CONSERVATIVES, AND THE SALEM WITCHCRAFT CRISIS: EXPLOITING THE FRAGILE COMMUNITIES OF COLONIAL NEW ENGLAND Master’s Thesis in North American Studies Leiden University By Megan Rose Griffiths s1895850 13 June 2017 Supervisor: Dr. Johanna C. Kardux Second reader: Dr. Eduard van de Bilt Griffiths 2 Table of Contents Introduction: A New Interpretation………………………………………………....… ……..4 Chapter One: Historiography....................................................................................................11 Chapter Two: The Background to the Crisis: Fragile Communities.........................................18 Puritanism……………………………………………………………….……..18 Massachusetts, 1620-1692……………………………………………...……...21 A “Mentality of Invasion”……………………………………………...……...24 The Lower Orders of the Hierarchy…………………………………………....26 Christian Israel Falling........................................................................................31 Salem, 1630-1692: The Town and the Village...................................................33 Chapter Three: The Radicals.....................................................................................................36 The Demographic Makeup of the Radicals……………………..……....……..38 A Conscious Rebellion……………………………..……….…………..….…..42 Young Rebels………………………………………………….……….……....45 Change at the Root…………………………………………...……....…….......49 The Witches as Rebels: Unruly Turbulent Spirits…………………...…..…......53 The Witches as Radicals: The Devil’s Kingdom……………………...…….....58 Chapter Four: The Conservatives...............................................................................................64
    [Show full text]
  • Criminals, Lunatics and Witches: Finding the Less Than Pleasant in Family History Craig L
    Criminals, Lunatics and Witches: Finding the Less Than Pleasant in Family History Craig L. Foster AG® Criminals The largest portion of the known criminal population were the common sneak thieves which included burglars, pickpockets and other types of thieves. Those involved in more violent crimes such as assault, battery, violent theft, highway robbery, manslaughter, murder, rape and other sexual offenses were fewer in number. Henry Mayhew, et al., The London Underworld in the Victorian Period (Minealoa, New York: Dover Publications, 2005), 109. In 1857, at least 8,600 prostitutes were known to London authorities. Incredibly, that was just a small portion of the estimated prostitutes in London. While London had the most prostitutes, there were ladies of ill-repute in every industrial centre and most market towns. Henry Mayhew, et al., The London Underworld in the Victorian Period (Minealoa, New York: Dover Publications, 2005), 6. Lists/records of “disorderly women” are found at: The National Archives at Kew Bristol Archives Dorset History Centre Gloucestershire Archives Plymouth & West Devon Records As well as many other repositories Children also served time in prison. For example, in Dublin, Ireland alone, between 1859 and 1891, 12,671 children between ages seven and sixteen were imprisoned. Prison registers are found at the National Archives of Ireland. Aoife O’Conner, “Child Prisoners,” Irish Lives Remembered 36 (Spring 2017), [n.p.] Online Sources for Searching for Criminals: Ancestry Birmingham, England, Calendars of Prisoners, 1854-1904 Cornwall, England, Bodmin Gaol, 1821-1899 Dorset, England, Calendar of Prisoners, 1854-1904 England & Wales, Criminal Registers, 1791-1892 London, England, King’s Bench and Fleet Prison Discharge Books and Prisoner Lists, 1734-1862 Surrey, England, Calendar of Prisoners, 1880-1891, 1906-1913 United Kingdom, Licenses of Parole for Female Convicts, 1853-1871, 1883-1887 FamilySearch Ireland Prison Registers, 1790-1924 findmypast Britain, Newgate Prison Calendar, vols.
    [Show full text]
  • Timothy Swan and the Essex County Witchcraft Crisis, 16921
    Chithelen 1 Niall Chithelen HIST2090, Professor Norton Final Paper 11/29/17 It Takes a Witch to Punish a Rapist: Timothy Swan and the Essex County Witchcraft Crisis, 16921 Timothy Swan (1663-1693) was a resident of Andover in 1692, a sufferer from what Emerson Baker calls a “mysterious illness,” a member of a disagreeable family, and an alleged rapist.2 Over the course of the Essex County witchcraft crisis, sixteen women admitted to afflicting Swan, and he became a central figure in the Andover cases.3 In the chaos and suspicion surrounding the witchcraft trials, his would-be afflictrixes saw that Swan was visibly ill; they recognized their own revulsion toward him; and they concluded that they must be responsible for his sickness. Swan’s affliction became a warped form of justice; the women who admitted to afflicting Swan might well have been asserting their own ability to punish an offender whom the law had let free. Conflicts in Andover and the Swan Family Although the 1692 witch trials in Salem Village have been examined in great depth, the goings-on in Andover and surrounding villages remain murky. Mary Beth Norton describes the “spiraling circle of accusations,” whereby confessions and accusations piled upon one another, with accusations crossing village lines—Andoverites testified against George Burroughs, and 1 I am using the term “Essex witchcraft crisis” from: Mary Beth Norton, In the Devil’s Snare: The Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002), 8. 2 Emerson W. Baker, A Storm of Witchcraft: The Salem Trials and the American Experience (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2014), 15.
    [Show full text]