DOCSLIB.ORG

Bethia Harris 1748-1833

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bethia Harris 1748-1833 THE ANCESTRY OF BETHIA HARRIS 1748-1833 WIFE OF DUDLEY WILDES OF TOPSFIELD MASSACHUSETTS BY WALTER GOODWIN DAVIS PORTLAND, MAINE THE SOUTHWORTH PRESS 1934 frro •~ 1•:-1 s-T1•:10 s II EAi>, <'o, D1wos I lo:\I 1•: oF (:11.1-:s ('11\n:s CONTENTS I. HARRIS, OF IPSWICH 3 II. HARRIS, OF IPSWICH, FROM IsLES oF SHOALS • . 35 III. MASON, OF CHELTENHAM, co. GLOUCESTER, ENG­ LAND 41 IV. LAKE, OF NoRTH BENFLEET, co. EssEx, ENGLAND 45 V. SANDELL, OF BASILDON, co. ESSEX, ENGLAND . 57 VI. READE, OF WicKFORD, co. EssEx, ENGLAND . 67 VII. CHURCH, OF RuNWELL, co. EssEx, ENGLAND • . 79 VIII. CooKE, OF PEBMARSH, co. EssEx, ENGLAND . 85 IX. SEAR.LE, OF IPSWICH AND ROWLEY . 95 X. COWES, OF IPSWICH . 101 XI. BERRY, OF IPSWICH 109 XII. JONES, OF IPSWICH . 113 XIII. BRADFORD, OF BEVERLY . 121 XIV. RAYMENT, OF BEVERLY • . 129 -xv. SCROGGS, OF LONDON, ENGLAND, AND SALEM • • 135 William Harris Thomas Harris Thomas Harris I I I John Lake John Harris John Lake --------I Elizabeth Sandell_ Martha Lake Edmund Reade John Harris Margaret Reade I Elizabeth Cooke William Searle _,:_::__Grace Searle I William Cowes John Harris Thomas Cowes Honor Lang Giles Cowes Mary Lux Elizabeth Cowes Bethia Harris Thomas Berry ~-~-Agnes Berry I Nathaniel Jones William Bradford Bethia Jones 1- ·--· George Rayment i , Rachel Bradford J·ohn Rayment I Rachel Rayment William Scroggs William Scruggs I , Rachel Prentice Rachel Scruggs I HARRIS, OF IPSWICH THE ANCESTRY OF BETHIA HARRIS HARRIS This account of the Harris family of Ipswich does not pre­ tend to be an exhaustive genealogy even of the generations with which it deals. The effort to prove the direct paternal ancestry of Bethia Harris became so involved in a maze of John Harrises, four or five of whom lived in the town simultaneously during the greater part of the eighteenth century, that a vast amount of materiai was accumulated dealing with other branches of the family, and it seems unkind not to include this and the conclu­ sions drawn from it for the benefit of other perplexed geneal­ ogists. After many doubts had arisen, the descent of Bethia Harris from Thomas Harris, the first of the name to settle in Ipswich, was brought to the point of genealogical proof by the evidences of the descent of the Sergt. John Harris homestead and the "clay-pit" meadow, both of which were property of the original settler, and the first of which is still in the possession of a direct. descendant in the person of Mrs. James Damon. Harris is one of the commonest of English surnames and initially it seemed very improbable that the English home of the family would ever be disclosed. Iles, however, is an equally un­ common surname, and it was through the relationship of the Harris emigrant to Richard Iles, who died in Charlestown in 1639, that we acquire two earlier generations of English Har­ rises. In treating of Richard Iles in his "Genealogical Diction­ ary of New England" Judge Savage stated "at the other end of. the same volume (referring to the first volume in the Suffolk Probate Registry) will be found the official papers of the parties at Bristol claiming as heirs." An exhaustive search of the early volumes of the registry drew a blank, and it was concluded that the papers had been placed loosely in the volume and had been lost or destroyed some time after Judge Savage had seen them 3 4 The Ancestry of Bethia Harris there. A year after this search a chance glance at the first vol­ ume of Suffolk deeds disclosed the desired power-of-attorney from the Iles heirs and produced the information that, beside a brother in Bristol, Richard Iles had a brother in "Katherope in the Countye of Clone" and a sister in "ffairefield" in the same· non-existent county. It took a surprisingly short time, with the aid of a topographical dictionary, to translate these hideously mis-transcribed localities into Hatherup and Fairford, two neighboring parishes in the county of Gloucester, and the printed index of wills at Gloucester, containing references to several wills of Harrises of Hatherup brought the search to a satisfactory conclusion. Hatherup is situated on a hill rising from the valley of the river Coln in one of the most picturesque districts of Gloucester­ shire. The village itself is a mere appendage to the manor house, now called Hatherup Castle and the home of Sir Thomas Bazeley. The village· church, in which the early Harrises wor­ shipped, was so pulled about in a drastic "restoration" in Vic­ torian days, that nothing of its original character remains. 1. JoHN HARRIS, yeoman, of Hatherup, co. Gloucester, was born at least as early as 1513. He married Anne or Annis ---, perhaps about the year 1533. His will, dated October 22, 1553, and proved June 4, 1554, left the lease of the house in which he dwelt to his daughter Alice Wynchcumbe, and,·if she should die before it expired, the remainder of the term was to belong to her daughter. His two sons, vVilliam and John Harris, received seventy-two acres of land occupied by William Carney, a sheep pasture and also ten sheep and a bullock apiece. The residuary legatee and executrix was his wife Anne Harris, and John Sermon, John Fathers and John Chapleyn were named overseers. The witnesses were John George, William Manne and John Sermon.* The will of Annis Harris, widow, of Hatherup, was made June 17, 1585, and proved February 5, 1585/6. She gave to her daughter Alice Winchkome a new gown, three sheets etc., and made small personal gifts to Anne, James, John and Thomas Winchkome, William Harris the younger, Anthony Harris and John Harris the younger, Joan Reve, Alice Kirbie, George and Marie Vincen and Elizabeth Robins. The residuary legatee and executor was Richard Harris. t * Gloucester Registry. t Gloucester Registry. Harris 5. Children :-. 1. ALICE; m. --Winchcombe before 1553, living in 1585; doubtless mother of Anne, James, John and Thomas Winchcombe, men­ tioned in her mother's will. 2. ii. WILLIAM. iii. JOHN; Richard Harris, executor of the will of John Harris's mother was probably John's son. 2 1 2. WILLIAM HARRIS (John ), of Hatherup, married No­ vember 21, 1568, in Cheltenham, co. Gloucester, Katherine Kiche. She died before 1579, when on January 30 he married Agnes Mason, daughter of Henry Mason of Cheltenham, who left legacies to her and her husband's daughter Anne Harris in his will in 1584. His will, dated ·October 1, 1598, was proved November 8, 1599, by his widow and executrix, Agnes Harris. After directing that he be buried in the church or churchyard of Hatherup, he left £5 apiece to his sons William (eldest), Anthony and John, £12 to his son-in-law John Iles and a cow to Joan Iles, daughter of his son-in-law, to be given her when she became seven years old. He then devised the residue of his property to "Annis Har-· ris my late vVife but if it please God to change the mind of Annis Harris my late Wife and Join herself in marriage and so alter the name, then my 4 youngest Sons: Thomas Harris, Edmund, William and Robert Harris shall have one half of my Goods." Henry Mason of Cheltenham and John Iles of Hatherup were named overseers.* Children, by first wife:- i. A DAUGHTER (Anne?, legatee of her step-mother's father in 1584); m. John Iles before 1598; Iles was listed as living in Hatherup in the military roll of Gloucestershire in 1608. Children:- !. Joan Iles; legatee in the will of her grandfather Harris in 1598. 2. Henry Iles; a husbandman, of Hatherup, in 1640, when he gave power of attorney to Henry Hazard of Bristol to collect the legacy left him by his brother Richard Iles of Charlestown. 3. John Iles; a carpenter, of Bristol, in 1640, when he joined his brothers and sister in the power of attorney to Henry Hazard. 4. William Iles; a blacksmith, probably of Bristol, in 1640, when he joined in the above mentioned power of at­ torney. 5. ]fargaret Iles; m. Thomas Hinton of Fairford, co. Gloucester; both joined in the above-mentioned power of attorney; his nuncupative will, declared Aug. 17, 1647, left his house to his wife Margaret for life, and * Gloucester Registry. 6 The .Ancestry of Bethia Harris named his sons John and Thomas and his daughters Ann and Katherine. 6. Richard Iles; cooper and carpenter; emigrated to Amer­ ica and settled in Charlestown, Mass., before 1639, when on Oct. 29 he made his will, the first recorded in Suffolk County, in which he directs that 45s. be sent · to England to his brother John Iles and John Keene, gives his coverlet to his aunt "for her pains and her love," 20s. apiece to his cousins Thomas, William, Anthony, John and Daniel Harris and Anne Maverick, 5s. apiece to "my two little cosins John and Abigaile Maverick," and the residue of his estate to his three brothers and one sister; on Jan. 25, 1640, (Henry) Iles of Hatherup, co. Gloucester, (John) Iles of the city of Bristol, house carpenter, William Iles of the (same) city, Thomas Hinton of Fairford, co. Glouces­ ter, yeoman, and Margaret, his wife, and John Keene of the city of Bristol gave a power of attorney to Henry Hazard of Bristol, mariner, to recover of Wil­ liam Stilson of Mass. Bay such sums as Richard Iles devised or bequeathed to them by his last will.* ii. WILLIAM; legatee in the wills of his grandmother in 1585 and of his father· in 1598.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • All Hands Are Enjoined to Spin : Textile Production in Seventeenth-Century Massachusetts." (1996)
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1996 All hands are enjoined to spin : textile production in seventeenth- century Massachusetts. Susan M. Ouellette University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Ouellette, Susan M., "All hands are enjoined to spin : textile production in seventeenth-century Massachusetts." (1996). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 1224. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/1224 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UMASS/AMHERST c c: 315DLDb0133T[] i !3 ALL HANDS ARE ENJOINED TO SPIN: TEXTILE PRODUCTION IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MASSACHUSETTS A Dissertation Presented by SUSAN M. OUELLETTE Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 1996 History ALL HANDS ARE ENJOINED TO SPIN: TEXTILE PRODUCTION IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MASSACHUSETTS A Dissertation Presented by SUSAN M. OUELLETTE Approved as to style and content by: So Barry/ J . Levy^/ Chair c konJL WI_ Xa LaaAj Gerald McFarland, Member Neal Salisbury, Member Patricia Warner, Member Bruce Laurie, Department Head History (^Copyright by Susan Poland Ouellette 1996 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT ALL HANDS ARE ENJOINED TO SPIN: TEXTILE PRODUCTION IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MASSACHUSETTS FEBRUARY 1996 SUSAN M. OUELLETTE, B.A., STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK PLATTSBURGH M.A., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Barry J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Elizabeth Howe
    Walton 1 Claire Walton HIST 2090 29 November 2017 Final Paper A Pious Woman Condemned by Rumor, Church, and Court: The Case of Elizabeth Howe “Though shee wer condemned before men shee was Justefyed befor god”1 -Goody Safford Prior to the year 1682, Goody Elizabeth Howe enjoyed a reputation defined by piety, honesty, and neighborliness. Two distinct disputes in 1682 would come together ten years later during the Salem witch crisis to place Elizabeth’s life in mortal peril. A “faling [out]” between Samuel Perley and the Howes preceded fits suffered by Samuel’s daughter, who reportedly identified Elizabeth as her tormentor. Although ministerial accounts contested Elizabeth’s culpability, rumors spread and stained Elizabeth’s holy reputation. Her rejection from the Ipswich Church approximately two or three years later, informed by the rumor of witchcraft and other reports from neighbors, exacerbated suspicion, as those involved in the church’s decision attributed maleficium to Elizabeth.2 The second dispute occurred on June 14, 1682, the same year Samuel Perley’s daughter first reported afflictions. The Topsfield men, Thomas Baker, Jacob Towne, and John Howe, Elizabeth’s brother-in-law, challenged John Putnam of Salem Village over his claim to land along the Ipswich River. This dispute pitted the Howe family against the Putnam family, a driving force behind the Salem witch trials of 1692. Ultimately, Elizabeth’s reputation of witchcraft coupled with her relationship to John Howe and by extension association with the Putnam land dispute influenced her conviction as a witch. Although numerous individuals 1 Bernard Rosenthal, et al., eds., Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 341 (Hereafter RSWH).
    [Show full text]
  • Perjurium Maleficis: the Great Salem Scapegoat
    Perjurium Maleficis: The Great Salem Scapegoat by Alec Head The Salem Witch Trials, often heralded as a sign of a religious community delving too deep into superstition, were hardly so simple. While certainly influenced by religion, the trials drew upon numerous outside elements. Though accusations were supposedly based in a firm setting of religious tradition, an analysis of individual stories—such as those of Rebecca Nurse, John Alden, and George Burroughs—shows that the accused were often targeted based on a combination of either fitting the existing image of witches, personal feuds, or prior reputations. The Puritans of Salem considered themselves to be “God’s chosen people,” building a new land, a heaven on earth.1 As with many endeavors in the New World, the Puritans faced innumerable struggles and hardships; their path would never be an easy one. However, rather than accepting their hurdles through a secular perspective, the Puritans viewed matters through a theological lens to explain their difficulties. While other, non-Puritan colonies faced similar challenges, the Puritans took the unique stance that they lived in a “world of wonders,” in which God and Satan had hands in the daily lives of humanity.2 In effect, this led to desperate—eventually deadly— searches for scapegoats. Upon his arrival in Salem, Reverend Samuel Parris publicly insisted that the hardships were neither by chance nor mere human hand. After all, if they were God’s chosen people, any opposition must have been instigated by the devil.3 Satan would not simply content himself with individual attacks. Rather, Parris insisted, grand conspiracies were formed by diabolical forces to destroy all that the Puritans built.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of the Salem Village Witchcraft Trials : Illustrated by A
    iiifSj irjs . Elizabeth Howe's Trial Boston Medical Library 8 The Fenway to H to H Ex LlBRIS to H to H William Sturgis Bigelow to H to H to to Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Open Knowledge Commons and Harvard Medical School http://www.archive.org/details/shorthistoryofsaOOperl . f : II ' ^ sfti. : ; Sf^,x, )" &*% "X-':K -*. m - * -\., if SsL&SfT <gHfe'- w ^ 5? '•%•; ..^ II ,».-,< s «^~ « ; , 4 r. #"'?-« •^ I ^ 1 '3?<l» p : :«|/t * * ^ff .. 'fid p dji, %; * 'gliif *9 . A SHORT HISTORY OF THE Salem Village Witchcraft Trials ILLUSTRATED BT A Verbatim Report of the Trial of Mrs. Elizabeth Howe A MEMORIAL OF HER To dance with Lapland witches, while the lab'ring moon eclipses at their charms. —Paradise Lost, ii. 662 MAP AND HALF TONE ILLUSTRATIONS SALEM, MASS.: M. V. B. PERLEY, Publisher 1911 OPYBIGHT, 1911 By M. V. B. PERLEY Saeem, Mass. nJtrt^ BOSTON 1911 NOTICE Greater Salem, the province of Governors Conant and Endicott, is visited by thousands of sojourners yearly. They come to study the Quakers and the witches, to picture the manses of the latter and the stately mansions of Salem's commercial kings, and breathe the salubrious air of "old gray ocean." The witchcraft "delusion" is generally the first topic of inquiry, and the earnest desire of those people with notebook in hand to aid the memory in chronicling answers, suggested this monograph and urged its publication. There is another cogent reason: the popular knowledge is circumscribed and even that needs correcting. This short history meets that earnest desire; it gives the origin, growth, and death of the hideous monster; it gives dates, courts, and names of places, jurors, witnesses, and those hanged; it names and explains certain "men and things" that are concomitant to the trials, with which the reader may not be conversant and which are necessary to the proper setting of the trials in one's mind; it compasses the salient features of witchcraft history, so that the story of the 1692 "delusion" may be garnered and entertainingly rehearsed.
    [Show full text]
  • WITCHCRAFT in SALEM VILLAGE. Harmony So
    134 WITCHCRAFT IN SALEM VILLAGE. given was that certain changes be made in the records. Harmony could not be secured, how- ever, and Mr. Lawson withdrew in 1688. Fol- lowing him came Rev. Samuel Parris, who was ordained on Monday, Nov. 19, 1689. It is evi- dent, therefore, that from the calling of Mr. Bayley in 1672 to the ordination of Mr. Parris in 1689 there was wanting in the parish that harmony so essential to church prosperity. That the disagreements about the settlements of the different pastors and over the parish rec- ords affected the minds of the people after the witchcraft delusion appeared among them there is little doubt. That it was the cause of the first charges being made seems hardly probable. George Burroughs, on leaving Salem Village, returned to Casco, Maine, He remained there a long time, for he and others were there in 1690 when the settlement was raided by Indians. Burroughs then went to Wells, Maine, and preached a year or more. There he was living in peace and quietness when the messenger from Portsmouth came to arrest him, at the demand of the Salem magistrates, in 1692. After leav- ing Salem Village he had married a third wife, a woman who had been previously married and of her own for after had children ; Burroughs' death, when the Massachusetts colony granted compensation to his family, his children com- plained that this third Mrs. Burroughs took the KEV. GEOBGE BUBBOUGHS. 135 entire amount for herself and her children/ Mr. Burroughs was a small, black-haired, dark com- plexioned man, of quick passions and possessing great strength.® We shall see by the testimony to be quoted further on that most of the evi- dence against him consisted of marvellous tales of his great feats of strength.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: the Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: The Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered Susan Kay Ocksreider College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Law Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ocksreider, Susan Kay, "The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: The Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625278. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-7p31-h828 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SALEM WITCH TRIALS FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE; THE IMPORTANCE OF SPECTRAL EVIDENCE RECONSIDERED A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of Williams and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Susan K. Ocksreider 1984 ProQuest Number: 10626505 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10626505 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Radicals, Conservatives, and the Salem Witchcraft Crisis
    Griffiths 1 RADICALS, CONSERVATIVES, AND THE SALEM WITCHCRAFT CRISIS: EXPLOITING THE FRAGILE COMMUNITIES OF COLONIAL NEW ENGLAND Master’s Thesis in North American Studies Leiden University By Megan Rose Griffiths s1895850 13 June 2017 Supervisor: Dr. Johanna C. Kardux Second reader: Dr. Eduard van de Bilt Griffiths 2 Table of Contents Introduction: A New Interpretation………………………………………………....… ……..4 Chapter One: Historiography....................................................................................................11 Chapter Two: The Background to the Crisis: Fragile Communities.........................................18 Puritanism……………………………………………………………….……..18 Massachusetts, 1620-1692……………………………………………...……...21 A “Mentality of Invasion”……………………………………………...……...24 The Lower Orders of the Hierarchy…………………………………………....26 Christian Israel Falling........................................................................................31 Salem, 1630-1692: The Town and the Village...................................................33 Chapter Three: The Radicals.....................................................................................................36 The Demographic Makeup of the Radicals……………………..……....……..38 A Conscious Rebellion……………………………..……….…………..….…..42 Young Rebels………………………………………………….……….……....45 Change at the Root…………………………………………...……....…….......49 The Witches as Rebels: Unruly Turbulent Spirits…………………...…..…......53 The Witches as Radicals: The Devil’s Kingdom……………………...…….....58 Chapter Four: The Conservatives...............................................................................................64
    [Show full text]
  • Timothy Swan and the Essex County Witchcraft Crisis, 16921
    Chithelen 1 Niall Chithelen HIST2090, Professor Norton Final Paper 11/29/17 It Takes a Witch to Punish a Rapist: Timothy Swan and the Essex County Witchcraft Crisis, 16921 Timothy Swan (1663-1693) was a resident of Andover in 1692, a sufferer from what Emerson Baker calls a “mysterious illness,” a member of a disagreeable family, and an alleged rapist.2 Over the course of the Essex County witchcraft crisis, sixteen women admitted to afflicting Swan, and he became a central figure in the Andover cases.3 In the chaos and suspicion surrounding the witchcraft trials, his would-be afflictrixes saw that Swan was visibly ill; they recognized their own revulsion toward him; and they concluded that they must be responsible for his sickness. Swan’s affliction became a warped form of justice; the women who admitted to afflicting Swan might well have been asserting their own ability to punish an offender whom the law had let free. Conflicts in Andover and the Swan Family Although the 1692 witch trials in Salem Village have been examined in great depth, the goings-on in Andover and surrounding villages remain murky. Mary Beth Norton describes the “spiraling circle of accusations,” whereby confessions and accusations piled upon one another, with accusations crossing village lines—Andoverites testified against George Burroughs, and 1 I am using the term “Essex witchcraft crisis” from: Mary Beth Norton, In the Devil’s Snare: The Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002), 8. 2 Emerson W. Baker, A Storm of Witchcraft: The Salem Trials and the American Experience (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2014), 15.
    [Show full text]
  • The Putnam Family and George Burroughs
    Revenge in the Salem Witchcraft Hysteria: The Putnam Family and George Burroughs Anastasia Karson "If the Putnams and others ever laid plans to ensnare any one person in the course of the witch-hunt, that person was [George] Burroughs." <1> The colonists of Massachusetts Bay expected to have trouble settling in the New World, far from their English heritage. Growing rapidly from the outset, the newcomers busied themselves establishing a governmental and religious order in a purely Puritanical method. With such success, the population expanded as well, shattering the relative tranquility the people of New England had known in the early years of their colonization. For example, in the mid-1600s, Salem divided into two communities: Salem Town and Salem Village, causing strain on the political, religious, and economical institutions of the people. Beyond these social difficulties, one cannot exclude human character and personal vengeance when considering what prompted the hysteria resulting in the death of nineteen men and women for the practice of witchcraft in 1692. Personal assault and revenge played a role in the accusations, often the result of harsh feuds and bitter memories. The members of the Putnam family were significant contributors to this aspect of the hysteria. Their greatest victim was George Burroughs, a former minister of Salem Village. The people of Massachusetts were in a state of confusion during the time in which the hysteria occurred. Between 1665 and 1692, the colony was enduring a particularly trying period. Political involvement from the crown had been both unstable and unsettling, as the infrequent attention of the distant government often turned violent.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Accused Slaves During the Salem Witchcraft Crisis
    How Black was Black Magic: An Exploration of Accused Slaves during the Salem Witchcraft Crisis Leela Chantrelle History 2090 Prof. Mary Beth Norton November 28, 2011 Chantrelle 2 The way that slaves were identified in their daily lives in Essex County was reflected in the way they were perceived in courts as accused witches. Slaves commonly lived a life in the background, due to the nature of their duties and expected behavior. Slaves were supposed to be invisible, but when they were identified it was by their race, evidenced by the way they were named. However, slaves were not only isolated from society by their race1, they were also different in the way they spoke, their lack of family, and their connections to foreign religions. While in court, slaves also used the power they had as accused witches to rebel against their owners. These aspects of how they were dissimilar can be seen in court with three slaves, Mary Black, Tituba, and Candy, and how their differences led to how they were treated in court. Because slaves were black or Indian and had no rights, they were restricted in ways that they could rebel against their masters. For them, the trials were an avenue through which they could adequately vent their anger. This is evidenced by the case of Candy, a slave originally from Barbados residing in Salem Town with her owner, Mistress Hawkes. When questioned, Candy revealed to the courts that it was her white mistress, Mrs. Margaret Hawkes, who had taught her witchcraft. After being asked if her mistress made her into a witch, Candy replied, “Yes, in this country Mistress give Candy witch.”2 Furthermore, as if to assure the arrest of her mistress, Candy went on to detail how Hawkes made her into a witch by bringing up the “devil’s book,” a book that people signed when they made a pact with the devil.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercy Lewis Mercy Lewis Born in Falmouth, Maine in 1675, Mercy Lewis Lost Both Her Parents to Indian Attacks and Became an Orphan at a Young Age
    Mercy Lewis Mercy Lewis Born in Falmouth, Maine in 1675, Mercy Lewis lost both her parents to Indian attacks and became an orphan at a young age. Dislocated from her family, like many of the accusing girls in Salem Village, she resided first as a servant with Reverend George Burroughs and then later with the family of Thomas Putnam to whom she was distantly related. As a friend of Ann Putnam and the other girls involved in the witchcraft accusations, Mercy herself became one of the most consistent and vocal accusers during the 1692 witchcraft trials in Salem. Mercy Lewis Written By Meghan Carroll, 2001 and Jenny Stone, 2002 Salem Witch Trials in History and Literature An Undergraduate Course, UV Spring Semester 2002 "I veryly believe in my heart," began 19 -year-old Mercy Lewis on April 19, 1692, "that Giles Corey is a dreadful wizzard." Lewis's confidence in herself was not unique to her accusation of Corey during the Salem Witchcraft Trials. Throughout the months plagued by chaos and confusion in Salem Village, Mercy Lewis acted as a member of the core group of accusing young women in the Village, blatantly accusing several persons of afflicting herself and her friends. Besides Giles Cory, Mercy Lewis accused Bridget Bishop, Mary Lacey, Sr., Susannah Martin, John Willard, Nehemiah Abbot, Jr., Sarah Wilds, and her former guardian, George Burroughs. Mercy Lewis was born in Falmouth, Maine in 1675. The Lewis family lived in Maine until an Indian attack killed all of Mercy's extended family. In the Devil's Snare historian Mary Beth Norton suspects that Mercy's parents were killed in a later attack witnessed by Mercy herself.
    [Show full text]
  • If It Weighs As Much As a Duck, It's Made of Wood, and Therefore a Witch
    If it Weighs as Much as a Duck, it’s Made of Wood, and Therefore a Witch Direct and Indirect Accusations of Witchcraft in Depositions of the Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692 Johanna Männistö MA Thesis English/Language Specialist Path School of Languages and Translation Studies Faculty of Humanities University of Turku May 2019 The originality of this thesis has been checked in accordance with the University of Turku quality assurance system using the Turnitin OriginalityCheck service. UNIVERSITY OF TURKU School of Languages and Translation Studies / Faculty of Humanities MÄNNISTÖ, JOHANNA: If it Weighs as Much as a Duck, it’s Made of Wood, and Therefore a Witch: Direct and Indirect Accusations of Witchcraft in Depositions of the Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692 MA Thesis, 70 pages, appendices 16 pages. English, Language Specialist Path May 2019 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – The material for this thesis comes from the original depositions that have survived from the Salem witchcraft crisis of 1692. The aim of the thesis is to show that the depositions contain both direct and indirect accusations of witchcraft, analyse how these are realised in the source material, and discuss trends emerging from them. The theory part of the thesis discusses how what we say is not always what we mean, and proves that there is a credible base to determine some accusations as direct and others as indirect. Main tools used are Grice’s Maxims and the Cooperative Principle, the concept of implicature, and Searle’s Speech acts. The analysis of the material shows that there are several different ways to make direct and indirect accusations in the depositions, that gender has more bearing on the accusers than the accused, and that young women are both more likely to give depositions, and also directly accuse individuals of witchcraft.
    [Show full text]