DOCSLIB.ORG

Drosophila Information Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drosophila Information Service Drosophila Information Service Number 96 December 2013 Prepared at the Department of Biology University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 73019 U.S.A. ii Dros. Inf. Serv. 96 (2013) Preface Drosophila Information Service (often called “DIS” by those in the field) was first printed in March, 1934. Material contributed by Drosophila workers was arranged by C.B. Bridges and M. Demerec. As noted in its preface, which is reprinted in Dros. Inf. Serv. 75 (1994), Drosophila Information Service was undertaken because, “An appreciable share of credit for the fine accomplishments in Drosophila genetics is due to the broadmindedness of the original Drosophila workers who established the policy of a free exchange of material and information among all actively interested in Drosophila research. This policy has proved to be a great stimulus for the use of Drosophila material in genetic research and is directly responsible for many important contributions.” Since that first issue, DIS has continued to promote open communication. The production of DIS volume 96 could not have been completed without the generous efforts of many people. Robbie Stinchcomb, Carol Baylor, and Clay Hallman maintained key records and helped distribute copies and respond to questions. Thanks to the efforts of Clay Hallman and Jenna Hellack, all issues, except the special issues that contained mutant and stock information now provided in detail by FlyBase and similar material in the annual volumes, are now freely-accessible from our web site: www.ou.edu/journals/dis. We continue to encourage all researchers to consider submitting articles that use Drosophila for teaching as well as articles that report new techniques, research results, and interesting new mutations. In the interests of honoring the long-standing philosophy of open exchange of ideas, we sometimes accept articles that have unusual perspectives. We thank the many contributors from around the world who sent material for this issue, and we invite your submissions as well as any suggestions you have for maintaining this as a useful Drosophila research community resource. James N. Thompson, jr., Editor Department of Biology University of Oklahoma, Norman Jenna J. Hellack, Associate Editor Department of Biology, Emeritus University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond Department of Biology, Adjunct Professor University of Oklahoma, Norman. Contributions, Orders, and Inquiries for the annual DIS issue should be sent to: James N. Thompson, jr., Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019; Phone: (405) 325-2001, FAX (405) 325-6202, email: [email protected] Dros. Inf. Serv. 96 (2013) iii List of Contributions General Announcements Back Issues and Invoice 220 Guide to Authors 228 New Books King, Robert C., Pamela K. Mulligan, and William D. Stansfield. A Dictionary of Genetics, 8th edition. 196 do Val, Francisca. Drosophila, Famous Little Flies 196 Research Notes Alatortsev, V.E. Orthologs of the eggshell gene Vml contain a diverse number of coding tandem repeats. 47 Andrianov, B.V., and D.A. Romanov. Comparative analysis of the fragment of the Y chromosome gene kl-2 1-beta dynein heavy chain in Drosophila virilis species group (Diptera: Drosophilidae). 48 Becker, J.R., and M.J. Simmons. Repression of hybrid dysgenesis in D. melanogaster males by the X-linked telomeric P element NA-P(1A). 69 Bhan, V., E. Khasa, P. Badhwar, and D. Dahiva. Divergent strategies for stress adaptations in D. punjabiensis in context of global warming. 20 Blauth, M.L., D.P. Lima, D.S. de Araujo, J.B. Moyses, and M.S. Gottschalk. New distribution records of four Drosophila species (Diptera, Drosophilidae) in Mato Grosso, Brazil. 58 Bochicchio, P.A., D.H. Bodin, L.A. Quesada-Allue, and A. Rabossi. Post-ecdysis behavior of exarate adults in Drosophila melanogaster and Ceratitis capitata. 124 Canals, J., J. Balanya, and F. Mestres. Drosophilid collection in the Font Groga site, Barcelona (Spain). 185 Cartier-Michaud, A., and J.A. Veenstra. Sucrose improves sexual performance in the male fruit fly. 56 Castrezana, S., R. Azurin, and Y.C. Badrakhan. Reproductive age and copulation duration in Drosophila species with females with low re-mating frequency. 177 Caudron, Q., C. Lyn-Adams, J.A.D. Aston, B.G. Frenguelli, and K.G. Moffat. Quantitative assessment of ommatidial distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. 136 Deepashree, S., T. Shivanandappa, and S.R. Ramesh. Extension of Drosophila melanogaster iv Dros. Inf. Serv. 96 (2013) lifespan by Decalepis hamiltonii root extract. 180 Dimitrijevic, D., M. Andjelkovic, and T. Savic. Influence of extremely low frequency magnetic field (50 Hz, 0.5 mT) exposure on fitness components of Drosophila subobscura. 75 Dimitrijevic, D., B. Janac, and T. Savic. Temporal pattern of Drosophila subobscura locomotor activity after exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic field (50 Hz, 0.5 mT). 84 Haddadi, M., S.R. Jahromi, T. Shivanandappa, and S.R. Ramesh. Neuurotransmitter enzymes profile in age-related memory impairment in Drosophila melanogaster. 156 Hogan, J., K. Walker, G. Newquist, A. Bousum, and T. Kidd. A novel mechanism underlying axon guidance phenotypes: Indirect disruption of embryonic axon guidance by unspecified cells. 191 Jayaramu, S.C., and M. Prathibha. Inversion and isozymes variation, mating behavior, and fitness in Drosophila ananassae. 106 Jayaramu, S.C., and M. Prathibha. Inversion polymorphism, sexual behavior, fitness, and morphometric traits in Drosophila ananassae. 114 Jessen, E., J.R. Becker, and M.J. Simmons. Cytotype repression of hybrid dysgenesis in D. melanogaster: Limited synergism between a telomeric P element and individual non-telomeric P elements implies a failure in Ping-pong amplification of regulatory piRNAs. 66 Krishna, M.S. Evidence of selective mating in D. malerkotliana: greater reproductive success of wild flies than Spw mutant. 186 Krishna, M.S., and U. Watson. The effect of pyrogallol on the pre-adult fitness of Drosophila bipectinata. 157 Krishna, M.S., and U.U. Waturuocha. The effect of pyrogallol on the resistance to starvation in Drosophila bipectinata. 127 Krishnamoorti, K., and A.K. Singh. Esterase-4 locus comprises active and null alleles in Drosophila ananassae. 54 Kudupali, S.L., and N. Shivanna. Influence of age on mating and fitness of Drosophila melanogaster. 71 Kumar, S., and A.K. Singh. Intra-chromosomal association between allozyme loci in Drosophila ananassae. 52 McGuire, M.K., A.D.S. Grant, and B.E. Staveley. Chronic exposure to tunicamycin Dros. Inf. Serv. 96 (2013) v during development has little effect upon the eye of GMR-Gal4 UAS-lacZ males. 153 Neethu, B.K., Y.R. Babu, and B.P. Harini. Enriched nutrient diet shortens the developmental time – A transgenerational effect in Drosophila sulfurigaster sulfurigaster. 98 Parkash, R., C. Lambhod, and D. Singh. Sexual selection in search of good genes: analysis of mate choice experiments and ecophysiological stress tolerance in Drosophila biarmipes. 33 Parul, B., E. Khasa, and V. Bhan. Developmental adaptive strategies for water balance mechanisms mediates range shift in Drosophila species of the takahashii subgroup from the western Himalayas. 7 Pasha, M., G. Sanjeev, T. Shivanandappa, and S.R. Ramesh. Radiation induced toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. 183 Paula, M.A., F.A. Brito, P.H.S. Lopes, and R. Tidon. Drosophila collections in the Arc of Deforestation, Brazil. 150 Pavkovic-Lucic, S., J. Trajkovic, and T. Savic. Mating frequency of Drosophila melanogaster strains reared on carrot and banana diets. 4 Pavkovic-Lucic, S., J. Trajkovic, L. Filipovic and T. Savic. Sex comb size in Drosophila melanogaster males maintained on carrot and banana substrates. 64 Prathibha, M., S.C. Jayaramu, and M.S. Krishna. Male age influence on mating activities of monomorphic and polymorphic strains of Drosophila ananassae. 164 Prathibha, M., S.C. Jayaramu, and M.S. Krishna. Male age effects on fitness are independent of inversion system in Drosophila ananassae (Diptera: Drosophilidae). 171 Ramakrishna, M.K., C.G. Darshan Raj, L. Kusuma, B.K. Sarojini, and S.R. Ramesh. Neuro- protective activity of Curcumin against paraquat induced oxidative stress markers in Drosophila melanogaster. 144 Sarswat, M., P.C. Sati, U. Semwal, M.K. Patel, S. Dewan, and R.S. Fartyal. Intra-specific cytogenetic variations among three Drosophilid species, viz., Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila repleta, and Zaprionus indianus collected along an altitudinal gradient in Garhwal region, India. 103 Sati, P.C., R.S. Fartyal, M. Sarswat, S. Dewan, M. Kandpal, Kanita, M.K. Patel, and S. Pradhan. Check-list of drosophilid species so far described and recorded from Uttarakhand state, India. 79 Singh, B.N., A. Singh, and P. Banerjee. Persistence of an inversion in laboratory stocks of Drosophila bipectinata. 1 vi Dros. Inf. Serv. 96 (2013) Srinath, B.S., and N. Shivanna. Fluctuation of Phorticella striata in mango plantations of Dharwad District. 61 Sumitha, R., S. Raman, Priyanka, and D. Parvathi. In vivo and in vitro genotoxicity analysis of silver nitrate. 40 Tahir, D. A preliminary report and the frequency distribution of Drosophila species of Rabwah, Pakistan. 51 Tahir, D. A preliminary report on Drosophila fauna of Lahore, Pakistan. 56 Tiffany, L.A., and S.P. McRobert. Population survey of Drosophila species in the Philadelphia area, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. 179 Trajkovic, J., S. Pavkovic-Lucic, M. Stamenkovic-Radak, M. Andelkovic, and T. Savic. Mating frequency of Drosophila subobscura from two populations. 90 Valer, F.B., A.S. Neutzling, F.R.M. Garcia, M.S. Gottschalk, and M.L. Blauth. The first record of Zygothrica orbitalis (Sturtevant, 1916) for the state of Rio Grande do Sul and the southernmost limits for seven species of Drosophilidae (Insecta: Diptera). 120 Vanderlinde, T., B. Wildemann, L. Bizzo, and D.C. De Toni. Drosophila polymorpha life cycle. 147 Vasudev, V., H.P. Guruhankara, P.V. Mahadimane, D. Khalandar, and B.R. Shamprasad. Effects of fungicide Dithane M 45 in Drosophila melanogaster on courtship behavior. 94 Technique Notes Beck, A.P., E.F. Hamlin, E.L. Hume, and R.M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Evolutionary Life History of P Transposons: from Horizontal Invaders to Domesticated Neogenes
    Chromosoma (2001) 110:148–158 DOI 10.1007/s004120100144 CHROMOSOMA FOCUS Wilhelm Pinsker · Elisabeth Haring Sylvia Hagemann · Wolfgang J. Miller The evolutionary life history of P transposons: from horizontal invaders to domesticated neogenes Received: 5 February 2001 / In revised form: 15 March 2001 / Accepted: 15 March 2001 / Published online: 3 May 2001 © Springer-Verlag 2001 Abstract P elements, a family of DNA transposons, are uct of their self-propagating lifestyle. One of the most known as aggressive intruders into the hitherto uninfected intensively studied examples is the P element of Dro- gene pool of Drosophila melanogaster. Invading through sophila, a family of DNA transposons that has proved horizontal transmission from an external source they useful not only as a genetic tool (e.g., transposon tag- managed to spread rapidly through natural populations ging, germline transformation vector), but also as a model within a few decades. Owing to their propensity for rapid system for investigating general features of the evolu- propagation within genomes as well as within popula- tionary behavior of mobile DNA (Kidwell 1994). P ele- tions, they are considered as the classic example of self- ments were first discovered as the causative agent of hy- ish DNA, causing havoc in a genomic environment per- brid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster (Kidwell et missive for transpositional activity. Tracing the fate of P al. 1977) and were later characterized as a family of transposons on an evolutionary scale we describe differ- DNA transposons
    [Show full text]
  • Highly Contiguous Assemblies of 101 Drosophilid Genomes
    TOOLS AND RESOURCES Highly contiguous assemblies of 101 drosophilid genomes Bernard Y Kim1†*, Jeremy R Wang2†, Danny E Miller3, Olga Barmina4, Emily Delaney4, Ammon Thompson4, Aaron A Comeault5, David Peede6, Emmanuel RR D’Agostino6, Julianne Pelaez7, Jessica M Aguilar7, Diler Haji7, Teruyuki Matsunaga7, Ellie E Armstrong1, Molly Zych8, Yoshitaka Ogawa9, Marina Stamenkovic´-Radak10, Mihailo Jelic´ 10, Marija Savic´ Veselinovic´ 10, Marija Tanaskovic´ 11, Pavle Eric´ 11, Jian-Jun Gao12, Takehiro K Katoh12, Masanori J Toda13, Hideaki Watabe14, Masayoshi Watada15, Jeremy S Davis16, Leonie C Moyle17, Giulia Manoli18, Enrico Bertolini18, Vladimı´rKosˇtˇa´ l19, R Scott Hawley20, Aya Takahashi9, Corbin D Jones6, Donald K Price21, Noah Whiteman7, Artyom Kopp4, Daniel R Matute6†*, Dmitri A Petrov1†* 1Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States; 2Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States; 3Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Washington and Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, United States; 4Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, United States; 5School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom; 6Biology Department, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States; 7Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States; 8Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, United States; 9Department of 10 *For correspondence:
    [Show full text]
  • Factors That Affect the Horizontal Transfer of Transposable Elements
    Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. (2004) 6: 57-72.Horizontal Transfer of Transposable Online journal at Elements www.cimb.org 57 Factors that Affect the Horizontal Transfer of Transposable Elements Joana C. Silva1*, Elgion L. Loreto2, Jonathan B. Clark3 within a genome (Doolittle and Sapienza, 1980; Orgel and Crick, 1980). Indeed, in studies that simulate genetic 1The Institute for Genomic Research, 9712 Medical Center crosses between genomes with and without transposable Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA elements, a TE that is transmitted to 100% of the resulting 2Departamento de Biologia-CCNE, Universidade Federal progeny can become fixed in the population even when de Santa Maria, CEP 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil reducing fitness by 50% (Hickey, 1982). A second 3Department of Zoology, Weber State University, Ogden explanation for the persistence of TEs is that they in fact UT 84408, USA benefit the host, providing genetic variability or mediating favorable structural changes in the genome that increase host fitness (McDonald, 1993; McFadden and Knowles, Abstract 1997; Kidwell and Lisch, 2000). Several recent studies report the widespread presence of TE-derived sequences Transposable elements are characterized by their in host genes and regulatory regions (Makalowski, 2000; ability to spread within a host genome. Many are also Nekrutenko and Li, 2001; Jordan et al., 2003; Silva et al., capable of crossing species boundaries to enter new 2003). These two hypotheses are not mutually exclusive genomes, a process known as horizontal transfer. and both may play roles in the evolution of transposable Focusing mostly on animal transposable elements, we elements. review the occurrence of horizontal transfer and In addition to their propensity for intragenomic spread, examine the methods used to detect such transfers.
    [Show full text]
  • 9Th International Congress of Dipterology
    9th International Congress of Dipterology Abstracts Volume 25–30 November 2018 Windhoek Namibia Organising Committee: Ashley H. Kirk-Spriggs (Chair) Burgert Muller Mary Kirk-Spriggs Gillian Maggs-Kölling Kenneth Uiseb Seth Eiseb Michael Osae Sunday Ekesi Candice-Lee Lyons Edited by: Ashley H. Kirk-Spriggs Burgert Muller 9th International Congress of Dipterology 25–30 November 2018 Windhoek, Namibia Abstract Volume Edited by: Ashley H. Kirk-Spriggs & Burgert S. Muller Namibian Ministry of Environment and Tourism Organising Committee Ashley H. Kirk-Spriggs (Chair) Burgert Muller Mary Kirk-Spriggs Gillian Maggs-Kölling Kenneth Uiseb Seth Eiseb Michael Osae Sunday Ekesi Candice-Lee Lyons Published by the International Congresses of Dipterology, © 2018. Printed by John Meinert Printers, Windhoek, Namibia. ISBN: 978-1-86847-181-2 Suggested citation: Adams, Z.J. & Pont, A.C. 2018. In celebration of Roger Ward Crosskey (1930–2017) – a life well spent. In: Kirk-Spriggs, A.H. & Muller, B.S., eds, Abstracts volume. 9th International Congress of Dipterology, 25–30 November 2018, Windhoek, Namibia. International Congresses of Dipterology, Windhoek, p. 2. [Abstract]. Front cover image: Tray of micro-pinned flies from the Democratic Republic of Congo (photograph © K. Panne coucke). Cover design: Craig Barlow (previously National Museum, Bloemfontein). Disclaimer: Following recommendations of the various nomenclatorial codes, this volume is not issued for the purposes of the public and scientific record, or for the purposes of taxonomic nomenclature, and as such, is not published in the meaning of the various codes. Thus, any nomenclatural act contained herein (e.g., new combinations, new names, etc.), does not enter biological nomenclature or pre-empt publication in another work.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers
    nuMBer 108, 54 pages 5 March 2010 Bishop MuseuM oCCAsioNAL pApeRs RecoRds of the hawaii Biological suRvey foR 2008 PaRt ii: animals Neal l. eveNhuis aNd lucius G. eldredGe, editors Bishop MuseuM press honolulu Cover illustration: Helicorthomorpha holstii (pocock) the flat-backed milliped, female, on o‘ahu. new state record. see p. 45 for more details. photo: Frank G. howarth. Bishop Museum press has been publishing scholarly books on the natu- researCh ral and cultural history of hawai‘i and the pacific since 1892. the Bernice p. Bishop Museum Bulletin series (issn 0005-9439) was begun puBliCations oF in 1922 as a series of monographs presenting the results of research in many scientific fields throughout the pacific. in 1987, the Bulletin series ishop useuM was superceded by the Museum’s five current monographic series, B M issued irregularly: Bishop Museum Bulletins in anthropology (issn 0893-3111) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany (issn 0893-3138) Bishop Museum Bulletins in entomology (issn 0893-3146) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology (issn 0893-312X) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Cultural and environmental studies (issn 1548-9620) Bishop Museum press also publishes Bishop Museum Occasional Papers (issn 0893-1348), a series of short papers describing original research in the natural and cultural sciences. to subscribe to any of the above series, or to purchase individual publi- cations, please write to: Bishop Museum press, 1525 Bernice street, honolulu, hawai‘i 96817-2704, usa. phone: (808) 848-4135. email: [email protected]. institutional libraries interested in exchang- ing publications may also contact the Bishop Museum press for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • Grootaert Debruyn Demeyer 1
    151 Agromyzidae Agromyzidae Luc DE BRUYN & Michael VON TSCHIRNHAUS Agromyzidae, or leaf miners are small to very small, generally grey to black or brown, sometimes partially or completely yellow, flies. Costal vein of wing extending to apex of vein Mi+2 or reduced to the apex of vein R4+5, broken at apex of Ri (then sub-costa developed throughout its length and merging with vein Ri before reaching costa) or some distance before the point where Ri reaches the costa (then sub-costa fading distally, ending in costa well separated of vein Ri); basai crossvein always present, poste- rior crossvein frequently lacking; anal cell present. On the head normally between three and six orbital bristles, lower fronto-orbi- tals inclinated or missing (Selachops\ postverticals divergent; vibrissae mostly present. Third antennal segment usually rounded, shorter or slightly longer than broad, sometimes elongated or with a sharp point, somethimes greatly enlarged in males. Tibiae with¬ out preapical bristles; mid tibiae often with one to three posterolateral bristles; for tibiae rarely with one posterolateral bristle. Fe- male 7 abdominal tergite and sternite fused and chitinised into a non-retractile sheath for ovipositor, the latter with family spécifie teeth for drilling. Larvae of all agromyzid species are internai plant feeders with a family spécifie morphology. Most species are miners in leaves where they produce a characteristic form of mine, in most of the cases a substantial aid in identifying the agromyzid (Hering, 1935a&b, 1936, 1937a&b; key for European species in Hering, 1957). Some species are stem-borers, or develop in roots, seeds or galis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Supertree Analysis and Literature Review of the Genus Drosophila and Closely Related Genera (Diptera, Drosophilidae)
    A supertree analysis and literature review of the genus Drosophila and closely related genera (Diptera, Drosophilidae) KIM VAN DER LINDE and DAVID HOULE Insect Syst.Evol. van der Linde, K. and Houle, D.: A supertree analysis and literature review of the genus Drosophila and closely related genera (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Insect Syst. Evol. 39: 241- 267. Copenhagen, October 2008. ISSN1399-560X. In the 17 years since the last familywide taxonomic analysis of the Drosophilidae, many stud- ies dealing with a limited number of species or groups have been published. Most of these studies were based on molecular data, but morphological and chromosomal data also contin- ue to be accumulated. Here, we review more than 120 recent studies and use many of those in a supertree analysis to construct a new phylogenetic hypothesis for the genus Drosophila and related genera. Our knowledge about the phylogeny of the genus Drosophila and related gen- era has greatly improved over the past two decades, and many clades are now firmly suppor- ted by many independent studies. The genus Drosophila is paraphyletic and comprises four major clades interspersed with at least five other genera, warranting a revision of the genus. Despite this progress, many relationships remain unresolved. Much phylogenetic work on this important family remains to be done. K. van der Linde & D. Houle, Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4295, U.S.A. ([email protected]). *Corresponding author: Kim van der Linde, Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4295, U.S.A.; telephone (850) 645-8521, fax (850) 645- 8447, email: ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Taxonomy in Drosophila Problems and Prospects
    [Fly 3:1, 10-14; January/February/March 2009]; ©2009 Landes Bioscience Drosophila taxonomy Review Phylogenetic taxonomy in Drosophila Problems and prospects Patrick M. O’Grady1,* and Therese A. Markow2 1University of California, Berkeley; Department of Environmental Science; Policy and Management; Berkeley, California USA; 2University of California, San Diego; Division of Biological Sciences; San Diego, California USA Key words: Drosophila, taxonomy, phylogenetics, evolution, classification The genus Drosophila is one of the best-studied model systems A given group of organisms can be classified as monophyletic, in modern biology, with twelve fully sequenced genomes available. paraphyletic or polyphyletic (Fig. 1A–C). Monophyletic groups, or In spite of the large number of genetic and genomic resources, clades, consist of a common ancestor and all descendants of that little is known concerning the phylogenetic relationships, ecology ancestor (Fig. 1A). Basing taxonomic structure on clades is a powerful and evolutionary history of all but a few species. Recent molecular approach because it provides information about the composition systematic studies have shown that this genus is comprised of at and exclusivity of a group. Shared derived characters that delimit a least three independent lineages and that several other genera are group can also be used to tentatively place newly discovered species. actually imbedded within Drosophila. This genus accounts for over Paraphyletic groups contain an ancestor and only some descendants 2,000 described, and many more undescribed, species. While some of that ancestor (Fig. 1B). Because some descendants of an ancestor Drosophila researchers are advocating dividing this genus into are not present in a paraphyletic group, these are less useful when three or more separate genera, others favor maintaining Drosophila trying to make an explicit statement about the evolutionary history as a single large genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Drosophilidae), with Comments on Combined Analysis and Character Support
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24 (2002) 249–264 www.academicpress.com Phylogeny of Drosophilinae (Diptera: Drosophilidae), with comments on combined analysis and character support James Remsena,b,*,1 and Patrick O’Gradya a Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79thStreet, New York, NY 10024, USA b Department of Biology, New York University, 1009 Main Building, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003, USA Received 29 August 2001; received in revised form 10 April 2002 Abstract Drosophilidae (Diptera) is a diverse, cosmopolitan family of flies. Here, we present a combined analysis phylogeny of Droso- philinae, one of the two subfamilies of Drosophilidae, based on data from six different data partitions, including both molecular and morphological characters. Although our data show support for the monophyly of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae, and the subgenus Sophophora, neither the genus Drosophila nor the subgenus Drosophila is monophyletic. Partitioned Bremer support (PBS) indicates that morphological data taken from Grimaldi’s monograph (Grimaldi, 1990a), as well as sequences from the mitochondrial (mt) 16S rDNA and the nuclear Adh gene, lend much support to our tree’s topology. This is particularly interesting in the case of Grimaldi’s data, since his published hypothesis conflicts with ours in significant ways. Our combined analysis cladogram phylogeny reflects the catchall designation that the name Drosophila has become, in that the cladogram does not support the monophyly of either the genus or subgenus Drosophila. Ó 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Fenster, 1989), extensive foreleg and mouthpart modi- fication (Carson et al., 1970), and wing patterning.
    [Show full text]
  • Catálogo De Los Diptera De España, Portugal Y Andorra (Insecta) Coordinador: Miguel Carles-Tolrá Hjorth-Andersen Edita: Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (SEA)
    MONOGRAFÍAS S.E.A. — vol. 8 Primera Edición: Zaragoza, 31 Diciembre, 2002. Título: Catálogo de los Diptera de España, Portugal y Andorra (Insecta) Coordinador: Miguel Carles-Tolrá Hjorth-Andersen Edita: Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (SEA). Avda. Radio Juventud, 37 50012 – Zaragoza (España) Director de publicaciones: A. Melic [email protected] http://entomologia.rediris.es/sea Maquetación y Diseño: A. Melic Portada: Díptero imaginario: Cabeza (Nematocera): Tipula maxima Poda; tórax y alas (Orthorrhapha): Rhagio scolopaceus (Linnaeus); abdomen (Cyclorrhapha): Cylindromyia brassicaria (Fabricius); patas anteriores (Nematocera): Bibio marci (Linnaeus); patas medias (Orthorrhapha): Asilus crabroniformis Linnaeus; patas posteriores (Cyclorrhapha): Micropeza corrigiolata (Linnaeus). Imprime: Gorfi, S.A. c/.Menéndez Pelayo, 4 50009 – Zaragoza (España) I.S.B.N.: 84 – 932807– 0 – 4 Depósito Legal: Z – 1789 – 94 © Los autores (por la obra) © SEA (por la edición). Queda prohibida la reproducción total o parcial del presente volumen, o de cualquiera de sus partes, por cualquier medio, sin el previo y expreso consentimiento por escrito de los autores y editora. Publicación gratuita para socios SEA (ejercicio 2002). Precio de venta al público: 18 euros (IVA incluido). Gastos de envío no incluidos. Solicitudes: SEA. Catálogo de los Diptera de España, Portugal y Andorra (Insecta) Miguel Carles-Tolrá Hjorth-Andersen (coordinador) MONOGRAFÍAS SEA, vol. 8 ZARAGOZA, 2002 a m INDICE DE MATERIAS / ÍNDICE DE CONTEÚDOS / INDEX OF MATTERS Introducción / Introdução
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    CATALOG OF THE DIPTERA OF THE AUSTRALASIAN AND OCEANIAN REGIONS 6^1 tMl. CATALOG OF THE DIPTERA OF THE AUSTRALASIAN AND OCEANIAN REGIONS Edited by Neal L. Evenhuis Bishop Museum Special Publication 86 BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS and E.J. BRILL 1989 Copyright © 1989 E.J. Brill. All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from E.J. Brill, Leiden or Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. ISBN-0-930897-37-4 (Bishop Museum Press) ISBN-90-04-08668-4 (E.J. Brill) Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 89-060913 Book Design and Typesetting by FAST TYPE, Inc. Published jointly by Bishop Museum Press and E.J. Brill TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE provided by: J. Rachel Reynolds B. Leilani Pyle JoAnn M. Tenorio Samuel M. Gon III LITERATURE CITED Neal L. Evenhuis, F. Christian Thompson, Adrian C. Pont & B. Leilani Pyle The- following bibliography gives fiiU referen- indexed in the bibliography under the various ways ces for over 4,000 works cited in the catalog, includ- in which they may have been treated elsewhere. ing the introduction, explanatory information, Dates ofpublication: Much research was done references, and classification sections, and appen- to ascertain the correct dates of publication for all dices. A concerted effort was made to examine as Uterature cited in the catalog. Priority in date sear- many of the cited references as possible in order to ching was given to those articles dealing with sys- ensure accurate citation of authorship, date, tide, tematics that may have had possible homonymies and pagination.
    [Show full text]
  • Song and Bucheli 2009 (Cladistics).Pdf
    Cladistics Cladistics 25 (2009) 1–13 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00273.x Comparison of phylogenetic signal between male genitalia and non-genital characters in insect systematics Hojun Songa,* and Sibyl R. Buchelib aDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA; bDepartment of Biological Sciences, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA Accepted 2 June 2009 Abstract It is generally accepted that male genitalia evolve more rapidly and divergently relative to non-genital traits due to sexual selection, but there is little quantitative comparison of the pattern of evolution between these character sets. Moreover, despite the fact that genitalia are still among the most widely used characters in insect systematics, there is an idea that the rate of evolution is too rapid for genital characters to be useful in forming clades. Based on standard measures of fit used in cladistic analyses, we compare levels of homoplasy and synapomorphy between genital and non-genital characters of published data sets and demonstrate that phylogenetic signal between these two character sets is statistically similar. This pattern is found consistently across different insect orders at different taxonomic hierarchical levels. We argue that the fact that male genitalia are under sexual selection and thus diverge rapidly does not necessarily equate with the lack of phylogenetic signal, because characters that evolve by descent with modification make appropriate characters for a phylogenetic analysis, regardless of the rate of evolution. We conclude that male genitalia are a composite character consisting of different components diverging separately, which make them ideal characters for phylogenetic analyses, providing information for resolving varying levels of hierarchy.
    [Show full text]