DOCSLIB.ORG

Projet De Parc Photovoltaïque Lagarde D’Apt (84)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Projet De Parc Photovoltaïque Lagarde D’Apt (84) 2016 PROJET DE PARC PHOTOVOLTAÏQUE LAGARDE D’APT (84) Ref : PA140905-CTT1 DOSSIER DE DEMANDE DE DEROGATION POUR LA CAPTURE OU L’ENLEVEMENT, LA DESTRUCTION ET LA PERTURBATION INTENTIONNELLE DE SPECIMENS D’ESPECES ANIMALES ET VEGETALES PROTEGEES Pour le compte de : NEOEN AGENCE Rhône-Provence Site Agroparc Rue Lawrence Durrell BP 31 285 84 911 AVIGNON Cedex 9 www.naturalia-environnement.fr 2016 Projet de parc photovoltaïque à Lagarde d’Apt (84) 2 / 183 PROJET DE PARC PHOTOVOLTAÏQUE LAGARDE D’APT (84) DOSSIER DE DEMANDE DE DEROGATION POUR LA CAPTURE OU L’ENLEVEMENT, LA DESTRUCTION ET LA PERTURBATION INTENTIONNELLE DE SPECIMENS D’ESPECES ANIMALES ET VEGETALES PROTEGEES Rapport remis le : 10 novembre 2016 Pétitionnaire : NEOEN 4 rue Euler, 75008 Paris Coordination : Caroline TA-TRUONG Chargés d’études milieu terrestre Thomas CROZE – Botaniste (NATURALIA) : Jean-Charles DELATTRE – Ornithologue Olivier PEYRE – Ornithologue et herpétologue Mathieu FAURE - Mammalogue Sylvain FADDA – Entomologiste Rédaction Chargés d’études listés ci-dessus Cartographie Olivier MAILLARD Validation Olivier PEYRE Suivi des modifications : 23/12/015 Première diffusion – Document de travail CTT, OP 09/11/2015 Intégration remarques –document de travail CTT 11/03/2016 Intégrations remarques DREAL CTT, OP 08/04/2016 Intégrations remarques Neoen CTT 11/04/2016 VF3 CTT 29/08/2016 VF4 CTT 04/11/2016 Version finale CTT 3 / 183 2016 Projet de parc photovoltaïque à Lagarde d’Apt (84) 4 / 183 2016 Projet de parc photovoltaïque à Lagarde d’Apt (84) SOMMAIRE SOMMAIRE ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Table des illustrations ........................................................................................................................... 7 Résumé non technique .......................................................................................................................... 9 1. Préambule ..................................................................................................................................... 20 2. Présentation du projet ................................................................................................................. 21 2.1. Le demandeur .................................................................................................................................... 21 2.2. Choix du site et justification du projet ............................................................................................. 21 2.2.1 Réflexion pour l’implantation d’un parc photovoltaïque sur le territoire de Lagarde d’Apt ............... 21 2.2.2 Justification de l’implantation (absence d’autre solution satisfaisante) ............................................ 22 2.2.3 Projet d’utilité publique ..................................................................................................................... 26 2.3. Présentation du projet retenu ........................................................................................................... 28 2.3.1 Autorisations administratives et appel d’offres ................................................................................. 28 2.3.2 Localisation ...................................................................................................................................... 28 2.3.3 Composantes du projet .................................................................................................................... 31 2.3.4 Phases de vie du projet ................................................................................................................... 44 2.3.5 Calendrier des travaux ..................................................................................................................... 44 3. Méthodologie ................................................................................................................................ 45 3.1. Définition de l’aire d’étude / Zone prospectée................................................................................. 45 3.2. Méthodologie d’inventaire ................................................................................................................. 45 3.3. Effort d’échantillonnage .................................................................................................................... 45 4. Contexte et enjeux naturalistes .................................................................................................. 48 4.1. Considérations éco-paysagères ....................................................................................................... 48 4.2. Bilan des protections et documents d’alerte................................................................................... 50 4.3. Principaux éléments du volet milieu naturel ................................................................................... 55 4.3.1 Les habitats naturels : approche parcellaire .................................................................................... 55 4.3.2 La flore ............................................................................................................................................. 57 4.3.3 La faune ........................................................................................................................................... 60 4.3.4 Cartographie bilan des enjeux ......................................................................................................... 66 4.4. Evaluation des incidences Natura 2000 ........................................................................................... 67 4.5. Principaux impacts du projet de parc photovoltaïque ................................................................... 68 4.5.1 Types d’impacts ............................................................................................................................... 68 4.5.2 Durée des impacts ........................................................................................................................... 73 5. Effets cumulés .............................................................................................................................. 74 6. Mesures d’atténuation proposées .............................................................................................. 75 6.1. Description des mesures d’évitement ............................................................................................. 76 5 / 183 2016 Projet de parc photovoltaïque à Lagarde d’Apt (84) 6.2. Description des mesures de réduction ............................................................................................ 77 6.3. Description des mesures d’accompagnement ................................................................................ 89 7. Evaluation des impacts résiduels du projet sur les espèces protégées ................................. 97 8. Description des espèces objet de la saisine ........................................................................... 100 8.1. Objet de la saisine de la commission Flore du CNPN .................................................................. 100 8.2. Objet de la saisine de la commission Faune du CNPN ................................................................ 100 8.3. Eléments floristiques remarquables .............................................................................................. 102 8.4. Eléments faunistiques remarquables ............................................................................................ 106 8.1. Autres éléments floristiques et faunistiques remarquables ........................................................ 112 9. Mesures compensatoires .......................................................................................................... 116 9.1. Principes fondateurs ....................................................................................................................... 116 9.2. Localisation des scénarios compensatoires proposés au maître d’ouvrage sur fondements écologiques ................................................................................................................................................... 117 9.3. Analyse multicritères ....................................................................................................................... 118 9.4. Scénarios compensatoires retenus ............................................................................................... 120 9.4.1 Localisation .................................................................................................................................... 120 9.4.2 Présentation des mesures compensatoires retenues .................................................................... 131 9.4.3 Localisation des mesures compensatoires .................................................................................... 141 9.4.4 Mesures d’accompagnement à la compensation ........................................................................... 142 10. Suivi des mesures engagées par le maître d’ouvrage ........................................................ 147 11. Chiffrage total des mesures .................................................................................................. 151 12. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 153 ANNEXES ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revision of Hycleus Solonicus (Pallas, 1782) (Coleoptera: Meloidae, Mylabrini), with Larval Description and DNA Barcoding
    © Entomologica Fennica. 30 November 2017 Revision of Hycleus solonicus (Pallas, 1782) (Coleoptera: Meloidae, Mylabrini), with larval description and DNA barcoding Zhao Pan, Qian-Qian Bai, Jue Wang & Guo-Dong Ren Pan, Z., Bai Q.-Q., Wang, J. & Ren, G.-D. 2017: Revision of Hycleus solonicus (Pallas, 1782) (Coleoptera: Meloidae, Mylabrini), with larval description and DNA barcoding. — Entomol. Fennica 28: 219–232. Hycleus solonicus (Pallas, 1782), referred to H. polymorphus species group, is revised. Adults are redescribed and illustrated, eggs and first-instar larvae are de- scribed and illustrated for the first time, COI sequence for DNA barcoding is re- ported for the first time, the geographical distribution is revised and all available faunistic records from the literature and collections are summarized. In addition, two incorrect determinations are pointed out and Zonabris solonica var. dianae Sahlberg, 1913 is proposed to be a synonym of Hycleus scabiosae (Olivier, 1811). Z. Pan, The Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P.R. China; E-mail: [email protected] Q.-Q. Bai, The Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, Col- lege of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China J. Wang, College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China G.-D. Ren, The Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Application, Col- lege of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China; E- mail: [email protected]. Received 30 August 2016, accepted 22 December 2016 1. Introduction vised. In the literature it has been confused with the genus Mylabris Fabricius, 1775 and other Hycleus Latreille, 1817, belonging to the tribe Mylabrini genera by several authors.
    [Show full text]
  • G:\00Bol30\000Meloidaearagon
    Cat. entomofauna aragon., 26 (2002): 3—21. CATALOGUS: 26 INSECTA: COLEOPTERA FAMILIA 41 MELOIDAE José I. Recalde, Antonio F. San Martín & Ignacio Pérez-Moreno Dirección de contacto: c/. Valle de Aranguren, 4 3º Dcha.; 31006 Pamplona (Navarra) INTRODUCCIÓN Los Meloidae constituyen un grupo de Coleoptera Tenebrionoidea especialmente interesante debido a: i) su condición de parásitos de Orthoptera e Hymenoptera en fases larvarias; ii) compleja metamorfosis, con larvas de primer estadio a menudo activas adaptadas para la foresis; y iii) estrategia defensiva ligada a su toxicidad por cantaridina. Están representados en la mayor parte del mundo, si bien tan solo algunos Meloini alcanzan áreas muy septentrionales. Dentro de esta familia se incluyen en la actualidad unos 120 géneros en los que se agrupan a unas 2.500 especies (BOLOGNA & PINTO, 2001). La clasificación de este grupo es actualmente objeto de revisión y cuestión, pero mientras se aclaran algunos puntos problemáticos y se alcanza un cierto consenso (SELANDER, 1991; BOLOGNA & PINTO, 2001), es razonable seguir utilizando el sistema más extendido de clasificación que, por otra parte, parece resultar más que plausible (BOLOGNA, 1991). Según éste, se distinguen cuatro subfamilias (Eleticinae, Tetraonycinae, Meloinae y Nemognathinae) de las cuales tan solo las dos últimas están representadas en la fauna europea, ibérica y aragonesa. El conocimiento existente sobre la fauna ibérica de meloidos es destacable, aunque incompleto en lo relativo a la distribución o incluso la presencia de ciertas especies. Los trabajos de diversos autores como GÓRRIZ (1882, 1902), RODRÍGUEZ LOPEZ-NEYRA (1914), las recopilaciones de FUENTE (1933) y sobre todo PARDO- ALCAIDE (1948, 1950a, 1950b, 1956a, 1956b, 1958, 1975) han hecho de los Meloidae casi una pequeña excepción dentro de los Coleoptera ibéricos.
    [Show full text]
  • Atti Accademia Nazionale Italiana Di Entomologia Anno LIX, 2011: 9-27
    ATTI DELLA ACCADEMIA NAZIONALE ITALIANA DI ENTOMOLOGIA RENDICONTI Anno LIX 2011 TIPOGRAFIA COPPINI - FIRENZE ISSN 0065-0757 Direttore Responsabile: Prof. Romano Dallai Presidente Accademia Nazionale Italiana di Entomologia Coordinatore della Redazione: Dr. Roberto Nannelli La responsabilità dei lavori pubblicati è esclusivamente degli autori Registrazione al Tribunale di Firenze n. 5422 del 24 maggio 2005 INDICE Rendiconti Consiglio di Presidenza . Pag. 5 Elenco degli Accademici . »6 Verbali delle adunanze del 18-19 febbraio 2011 . »9 Verbali delle adunanze del 13 giugno 2011 . »15 Verbali delle adunanze del 18-19 novembre 2011 . »20 Commemorazioni GIUSEPPE OSELLA – Sandro Ruffo: uomo e scienziato. Ricordi di un collaboratore . »29 FRANCESCO PENNACCHIO – Ermenegildo Tremblay . »35 STEFANO MAINI – Giorgio Celli (1935-2011) . »51 Tavola rotonda su: L’ENTOMOLOGIA MERCEOLOGICA PER LA PREVENZIONE E LA LOTTA CONTRO GLI INFESTANTI NELLE INDUSTRIE ALIMENTARI VACLAV STEJSKAL – The role of urban entomology to ensure food safety and security . »69 PIERO CRAVEDI, LUCIANO SÜSS – Sviluppo delle conoscenze in Italia sugli organismi infestanti in post- raccolta: passato, presente, futuro . »75 PASQUALE TREMATERRA – Riflessioni sui feromoni degli insetti infestanti le derrate alimentari . »83 AGATINO RUSSO – Limiti e prospettive delle applicazioni di lotta biologica in post-raccolta . »91 GIACINTO SALVATORE GERMINARA, ANTONIO DE CRISTOFARO, GIUSEPPE ROTUNDO – Attività biologica di composti volatili dei cereali verso Sitophilus spp. » 101 MICHELE MAROLI – La contaminazione entomatica nella filiera degli alimenti di origine vegetale: con- trollo igienico sanitario e limiti di tolleranza . » 107 Giornata culturale su: EVOLUZIONE ED ADATTAMENTI DEGLI ARTROPODI CONTRIBUTI DI BASE ALLA CONOSCENZA DEGLI INSETTI ANTONIO CARAPELLI, FRANCESCO NARDI, ROMANO DALLAI, FRANCESCO FRATI – La filogenesi degli esa- podi basali, aspetti controversi e recenti acquisizioni .
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas De Los Invertebrados Amenazados De España (Especies En Peligro Crítico Y En Peligro)
    ATLAS DE LOS INVERTEBRADOS AMENAZADOS DE ESPAÑA (ESPECIES EN PELIGRO CRÍTICO Y EN PELIGRO) ATLAS DE LOS INVERTEBRADOS AMENAZADOS DE ESPAÑA (ESPECIES EN PELIGRO CRÍTICO Y EN PELIGRO) Editores: José R. Verdú y Eduardo Galante Madrid 2008 Instituciones colaboradoras Asociación Española Sociedad Española de de Entomología Malacología Editores José R. Verdú y Eduardo Galante Instituto de Biodiversidad CIBIO Universidad de Alicante Dirección Técnica del Proyecto Cosme Morillo y Ricardo Gómez Calmaestra Dirección General para la Biodiversidad Ministerio de Medio Ambiente Coordinación General del Proyecto Fernando Corrales y Elena Bermejo División Servicios Medioambientales TRAGSA Realización y producción: Edición cartográfica Roberto Matellanes - División Servicios Medioambientales TRAGSA Catherine Numa - CIBIO, Universidad de Alicante Jorge M. Lobo - Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC Diseño y maquetación Santiago Oñate Fotografías de portada José R. Verdú A efectos bibliográficos la obra debe citarse como sigue: Verdú, J. R. y Galante, E., eds. 2009. Atlas de los Invertebrados Amenazados de España (Especies En Peligro Crítico y En Peligro). Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, 340 pp. Cada ficha de especie debe citarse como un capítulo de libro: Munguira, M.L., Martín Cano, J., García-Barrios, E. y Pajarón, J. L. 2008. Polyommatus golgus (Hübner, [1813]). Pp:185-189. En: Verdú, J. R. y Galante, E., (eds). 2009. Atlas de los Invertebrados Amenazados de España (Especies En Peligro Crítico y En
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Meloidae) and Its Probable Importance in Sexual Behaviour
    Transfer and Distribution of Cantharidin within Selected Members of Blister Beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae) and Its Probable Importance in Sexual Behaviour Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften an der Fakultät für Biologie, Chemie und Geowissenschaften der Universität Bayreuth Vorgelegt von Mahmood Reza Nikbakhtzadeh Shiraz, Iran Bayreuth, Germany September 2004 This study has been accomplished from August 1st 2001 to July 16th 2004, in the Department of Animal Ecology II at the University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany under supervision of Professor Dr. Konrad Dettner. Referee: Professor Dr. Konrad Dettner. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 FAMILY MELOIDAE ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 FAMILY DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 STATUS OF CLASSIFICATION............................................................................................. 2 1.2 BIOLOGY AND LIFE CYCLE IN SUB FAMILY MELOINAE .................................................. 2 1.2.1 HABITATS AND DISTRIBUTION.......................................................................................... 5 1.3 ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF BLISTER BEETLES.............................................................. 5 1.4 AN OVERVIEW TO INSECT CHEMICAL DEFENCE............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meloidae (Coleoptera) of Ankara Province (Turkey)
    M.A. Demir and M. Kabalak et al. / Hacettepe J. Biol. & Chem., 2021, 49 (4), 391-403 Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry Research Article journal homepage: www.hjbc.hacettepe.edu.tr Faunistic Study on the Family Meloidae (Coleoptera) of Ankara Province (Turkey) Ankara İli (Türkiye) Meloidae (Coleoptera) Familyası Üzerine Faunistik Çalışma Muhammed Arif Demir 1 and Mahmut Kabalak1,2* 1Department of Biology, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey. 2Hacettepe University Biodiversity Research and Application Center, Ankara, Turkey. ABSTRACT he main aim of this study is to determining Meloidae fauna of Ankara. 3301 specimens were collected. 43 species belon- Tging to 2 subfamilies and 15 genera were identified. The genus Mylabris Fabricius, 1775 is the most species-rich genus with 10 species. Cerocoma (s.str.) bernhaueri Pardo Alcaide, 1977, Alosimus luteus (Waltl, 1838), Teratolytta monticola Bo- logna, 2006, Hycleus polymorphus (Pallas, 1771), H. sexmaculatus (A.G. Olivier, 1811), Mylabris (Micrabris) unicolor Falder- mann, 1837, Meloe (Eurymeloe) mediterraneus (G. Muller, 1925) and Stenoria (s.str.) apicalis (Latreille, 1804) species were recorded from Central Anatolian Region of Turkey for the first time. Detailed locality records of M. (Micrabris) unicolor and S. (s.str.) apicalis in Turkey were given with this study for the first time. The most western distributions of Alosimus luteus and Teratolytta monticola were given with this study. Key Words Meloidae, Ankara, Turkey, Faunistic evaluations. ÖZ u çalışmanın temel amacı Ankara’nın Meloidae faunasını belirlemektir. 3301 örnek toplanmıştır. 2 altfamilya ve 15 cinse Bait toplam 43 tür tespit edilmiştir. Mylabris Fabricius cinsi, 1775, 10 türle tür sayısı açısından en zengin cinstir.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies & Moths of the Spanish Pyrenees
    Butterflies & Moths of the Spanish Pyrenees Naturetrek Tour Report 5 - 12 July 2017 Mediterranean Burnet Zygaena occitanica by Chris Gibson Spanish Swallowtail by Chris Gibson Owl-fly Libelloides longicornis by Chris Gibson Tibicen plebejus - a large cicada by Chris Gibson Report compiled by Chris Gibson Images courtesy of Neil Holman and Chris Gibson Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Butterflies & Moths of the Spanish Pyrenees Tour participants: Chris Gibson & Peter Rich (leaders) together with ten Naturetrek clients Introduction Recent cool and wet weather around Berdún, in the foothills of the Aragónese Pyrenees, had been preceded by several weeks of ferociously hot conditions that threatened to dry out the landscape, shrivel up the nectar sources, and generally bring the butterfly season to a premature close. In the event, we were saved by the most recent weather, and at least when the sun came out the persisting nectar-rich flowers attracted large numbers and a rich diversity of butterflies. We explored from the lowlands to the high mountains in weather that varied from warm and humid to very hot and dry, but with little rain by day at least. In total the week produced 112 species of butterfly, together with many dazzling day-flying moths (particularly burnets) and other wonderful bugs and beasties. Occasional moth trapping gave us a window into the night-life, albeit dominated by Pine Processionary moths, but with a good sample of the big, beautiful and bizarre.
    [Show full text]
  • Cévennes 31 May – 8 June 2017
    The Cévennes 31 May – 8 June 2017 Participants Ron Fitton and Val Appleyard Michael and Valerie Grogutt Andrew and Ursula Edwards Leslie and Heather Green From the Salisbury & District Natural History Society Barbara Carter Ailsa McKee Brenda Davis Marian Freeman Rosemary and Gerald Nicholls Leaders Rachel and Robin Hamilton Daily diary by Rachel and Robin, plant list by Rachel, other lists by Robin. All the photos in this report were taken during the holiday by group members or leaders RR = Rachel/Robin, AU = Andrew/Ursula, HG = Heather, VA = Val Appleyard. Front cover photo – view across the Dourbie valley (VA). Below – the group at les Baumes (AU) Our host at la Gare Aux Ânes was Sylvain Goleo – http://lagareauxanes.free.fr This holiday, as for every Honeyguide holiday, also puts something into conservation in our host country by way of a contribution to the wildlife that we enjoyed. The conservation contribution this year of £40 per person was supplemented by gift aid through the Honeyguide Wildlife Charitable Trust, giving a total of £700 towards the protection of vultures and other wildlife of the Grands Causses but because this is a LIFE project, the figure is raised by EU funding to £2,800. This brings the total given to LPO to £24,898 since 1991. The total for all conservation contributions through Honeyguide since 1991 and up to September 2017 is £118,522. 2 DAILY DIARY Day 1: Wednesday, 31 May – Arrival, Montpellier to la Gare aux Ânes That first infusion of warm Mediterranean air never fails to lift the heart; the flight was easy, flamingos calmly waded in the lagoon beside the airport as we landed, there was a kestrel hovering and a serin was singing from the airport terminal building.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankara Ili Meloidae (Insecta: Coleoptera)
    ANKARA İLİ MELOIDAE (INSECTA: COLEOPTERA) FAMİLYASI ÜZERİNDE SİSTEMATİK ARAŞTIRMALAR SYSTEMATIC RESEARCHES ON THE FAMILY MELOIDAE (INSECTA: COLEOPTERA) IN ANKARA PROVINCE MUHAMMED ARİF DEMİR DOÇ. DR. MAHMUT KABALAK Tez Danışmanı Hacettepe Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Egitim-Öğretim ve Sınav Yönetmeliğinin Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı için Öngördüğü YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ olarak hazırlanmıştır. 2019 Aileme ve yakın zamanda kaybettiğim dedeme… ÖZET ANKARA İLİ MELOIDAE (INSECTA: COLEOPTERA) FAMİLYASI ÜZERİNDE SİSTEMATİK ARAŞTIRMALAR Muhammed Arif DEMİR Yüksek Lisans, Biyoloji Bölümü Tez Danışmanı: Doç. Dr. Mahmut KABALAK Haziran 2019, 198 Sayfa Bu çalışmada, Ankara ili Meloidae (Coleoptera) familyası üzerinde araştırmalar yapılmıştır. Bu amaçla, Ankara ilinde Mayıs-Ekim 2018 ve Nisan-Mayıs 2019 aylarında arazi çalışmaları yapılmıştır. 2153 örnek toplanmıştır. 2 altfamilya ve 13 cinse ait toplam 30 tür teşhis edilmiştir. Meloinae altfamilyasından 8 cinse ait 22 tür, Nemognathinae altfamilyasından ise 5 cinse ait 8 tür tespit edilmiştir. Mylabris Fabricius, 1775 cinsi 8 tür ile en çok türe sahiptir. Alosimus luteus (Waltl, 1838), Teratolytta monticola Bologna, 2006, Hycleus polymorphus polymorphus (Pallas, 1771) ve Stenoria (s.str.) apicalis apicalis (Latreille, 1804) türleri ilk defa bu çalışma ile İç Anadolu Bölgesi’nden kayıt edilmiş ve S. (s.str.) apicalis apicalis’in, bu çalışmada Türkiye için ilk defa detaylı lokalite kaydı verilmiştir. Alosimus luteus türünün en batı kaydı bu çalışma ile verilmiştir. Tespit edilen tüm türlerin ayrıntılı lokalite kayıtları, Türkiye ve Dünya yayılışları, tüm türlerin sinonimleri verilmiştir. Bu çalışma ile türler sistematik ve taksonomik, faunistik, ekolojik ve zoocoğrafik özellikler açısından değerlendirilmiş ve tartışılmıştır. Sistematik ve taksonomik değerlendirmeler ve tartışmalarda, 30 türün genel morfolojisi ayrıntılı olarak i incelenmiş, tanımlanmış ve fotoğraflanmıştır. Erkek örnekleri olan 20 türün erkek genital organları ayrıntılı bir şekilde tanımlanmış, çizilmiş ve fotoğraflanmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Status in and Around Avadhan Industrial Area in Dhule District of Maharashtra, India
    International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology Research Article Open Access Ecological Status in and around Avadhan Industrial Area in Dhule District of Maharashtra, India Abstract Volume 5 Issue 2 - 2020 The ecology and biodiversity of any area is the indicator of that particular area. Increasing Ashok K Rathoure population demanding more food and place to sustain, the biodiversity of area can be M/s Akone Services, Paschim Vihar Colony, Mohan Road, India protected and conserved to better life and sustainability. Rapid industrialization is degrading the local biodiversity, hence it is strongly recommended that the industry set up should Correspondence: Ashok K Rathoure C/O Mr. Gyanendra K be at defined place or notified industrial area viz. MIDC (Maharashtra), GIDC (Gujarat), Rathoure, Mayashivraj Sadan, Gupta Colony, Hardoi–241001, UPSIDC (Uttar Pradesh), etc. (UP), India, Tel +91 9450501471, Email Keywords: avifauna, biodiversity, industrialization, notified industrial area Received: July 10, 2020 | Published: December 17, 2020 Introduction in the forest can be listed as Teak, Anjan, Arjun, Bel, Babul, Khair, Palas, Parijatak etc. Growth of plants quite stunted because of poor Peculiarity in the species composition and functioning of soil quality but growth of grasses is abundant in all areas. Major ecosystem carried out by anthropogenic activities. The first part to be land is covered with scrub forest which is uneconomic and thorny affected directly as well as indirectly and in a short, medium- and long- species. Biological environment of the area was studied during the 1,2 term span would be the biotic component of the area. The biological study period. No endangered species have been sighted in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • La Colección Ibero–Balear De Meloidae Gyllenhal, 1810 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea) Del Museu De Ciències Naturals De Barcelona
    Arxius de Miscel·lània Zoològica, 14 (2016): 117–216 ISSN: Prieto1698– et0476 al. La colección ibero–balear de Meloidae Gyllenhal, 1810 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea) del Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona M. Prieto, M. García–París & G. Masó Prieto, M., García–París, M. & Masó, G., 2016. La colección ibero–balear de Meloidae Gyllenhal, 1810 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea) del Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona. Arxius de Miscel·lània Zoològica, 14: 117–216. Abstract The Ibero–Balearic collection of Meloidae Gyllenhal, 1810 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea) of the Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona.— A commented catalogue of the Ibero-Balearic collection of Meloidae Gyllenhal, 1810 housed in the Museu de Ciències Naturals de Bar- celona is presented. The studied material consists of 2,129 specimens belonging to 49 of 64 species from the Iberian peninsula and the Balearic Islands. The temporal coverage of the collection extends from the last decades of the nineteenth century to the present time. Revision, documentation, and computerization of the material have been made, resulting in 963 collection records (June 2014). For each lot, the catalogue includes the register number, geographical data, collection date, collector or origin of the collection, and number of specimens. Information about taxonomy and distribution of the species is also given. Chorological novelties are provided, extending the distribution areas for most species. The importance of the collection for the knowledge of the Ibero–Balearic fauna of Meloidae is discussed, particularly concerning the area of Catalonia (northeastern Iberian peninsula) as it accounts for 60% of the records. Some rare or particularly interesting species in the collection are highlighted, as are those requiring protection measures in Spain and Catalonia.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea: Meloidae) of Iran 59-138 Entomofauna 40/1 Heft 5: 59-138 Ansfelden, 10
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomofauna Jahr/Year: 2019 Band/Volume: 0040 Autor(en)/Author(s): Ghahari Hassan, Campos-Soldini Maria Paula Artikel/Article: An annotated catalogue of blister-beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea: Meloidae) of Iran 59-138 Entomofauna 40/1 Heft 5: 59-138 Ansfelden, 10. Mai 2019 An annotated catalogue of blister-beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea: Meloidae) of Iran Hassan GHAHARI & María Paula CAMPOS-SOLDINI Abstract This paper represents the first comprehensive list of Iranian Meloidae and shows that Iran has a highly diverse fauna for the region. In total, 230 species and subspecies from two subfamilies, Meloinae (201 species within 22 genera) and Nemognathinae (29 species within 10 genera) are listed. Of the total species listed here, Apalus bimaculatus (LINNAEUS, 1761) and Meloe (Eurymeloe) scabriusculus BRANDT & ERICHSON, 1832 were found as new records in the country. Forty species are endemic for Iran, and three species are doubtful. Zusammenfassung Die vorliegende Arbeit beinhaltet die erste umfassende Liste der Meloidae des Iran und zeigt, dass der Iran eine hochdiverse Fauna in dieser Region besitzt. Insgesamt werden 230 Arten und Unterarten aus zwei Unterfamilien aufgelistet: Meloinae mit 201 Arten aus 22 Gattungen und Nemognathinae mit 29 Arten aus 10 Gattungen. Apalus bimaculatus (LINNAEUS, 1761) und Meloe (Eurymeloe) scabriusculus BRANDT & ERICHSON, 1832 werden neu für den Iran gemeldet. 40 Arten sind für den Iran endemisch, drei Arten sind zweifelhaft. Introduction The family Meloidae (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea) include about 120 genera and ca.3000 species (BOLOGNA 1991; BOLOGNA et al. 2008a, 2010; BOLOGNA & DI GIULIO 2011).
    [Show full text]