DOCSLIB.ORG

Committee Meeting May 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Committee Meeting May 2018 Committee Meeting May 2018 Committee Members F. Ferrer, Committee Chairman S. Rechler A. Albert J. Samuelsen R. Glucksman P. Trottenberg D. Jones V. Vanterpool S. Metzger J. Vitiello C. Moerdler P. Ward J. Molloy C. Weisbrod View of the completed Myrtle Viaduct after its reconstruction. Photo: Marc A. Hermann/MTA New York City Transit. New York City Transit and Bus Committee Meeting 2 Broadway -20th Floor Conference Room New York, NY 10004 Monday, 5/21/2018 10:30 AM - 12:00 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – APRIL 23, 2018 April Committee Meeting Minutes - Page 4 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN Committee Work Plan - Page 11 4. PRESIDENT'S REPORT President's Report May 2018 - Page 19 a. Customer Service Report i. Subway Report Subway Report - Page 21 ii. NYCT, MTA Bus Report NYCT, MTA Bus Report - Page 49 iii. Paratransit Report Paratransit Report - Page 73 b. Safety Report Safety Report - Page 87 c. Crime Report Crime Report - Page 91 d. NYCT, SIR, MTA Bus Financial & Ridership Reports NYCT, SIR, MTA Bus Financial and Ridership Reports - Page 100 e. Capital Program Status Report Capital Program Status Report - Page 152 5. MTACC REPORT MTACC Report - Page 163 6. PROCUREMENTS NYCT May Procurement Staff Summary and Resolution - Page 168 a. Non-Competitive NYCT Non-Competitive Actions - Page 173 b. Competitive NYCT, MTA Bus Competitive Actions - Page 175 c. Ratifications NYCT Ratifications - Page 181 7. SERVICE CHANGES a. Subway Schedule Changes Effective November 2018 Subway Schedule Changes, Effective November 2018 - Page 184 b. Bus Schedule Changes, Effective July 2018 MTA Bus Schedule Changes, Effective July 2018 - Page 188 c. QM24, QM25, and QM34 Eastbound Travel Path Revision in Glendale, Queens MTA Bus QM24, QM25 and QM34 Eastbound Travel Path Revision in Glendale, Queens - Page 193 8. STANDARD FOLLOW UP REPORTS a. MetroCard Report Metro Card Report - Page 198 b. Elevator & Escalator Report, 1st Quarter, 2018 Elevator & Escalator Report, 1st Quarter, 2018 - Page 203 c. Transit Adjudication Bureau Report, 1st Quarter, 2018 Transit Adjudication Bureau Report, 1st Quarter, 2018 - Page 239 d. EEO & Diversity Report, 1st Quarter, 2018 (NYCT & MTA Bus) NYCT EEO & Diversity Report,1st Quarter, 2018 - Page 242 MTA Bus EEO & Diversity Report, 1st Quarter, 2018 - Page 259 9. OUTSTANDING BUSINESS (No Materials) 10. EXECUTIVE OFFICE CONTACT INFORMATION Executive Office Contact Information - Page 276 Minutes of Regular Meeting Committee on Operations of the MTA New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority, Capital Construction Company and Bus Company April 23, 2018 Meeting Held at: Metropolitan Transportation Authority Two Broadway New York, New York 10004 10:00 AM The following Members were present: Hon. Fernando Ferrer, Committee Chair Hon. Andrew Albert Hon. Randolph Glucksman Hon. David R. Jones Hon. Susan G. Metzger Hon. Charles G. Moerdler Hon. John J. Molloy Hon. Scott Rechler Hon. Polly Trottenberg Hon. Veronica Vanterpool Hon. James E. Vitiello Hon. Peter Ward Hon. Carl Weisbrod The following Members were absent: Hon. Norman E. Brown Hon. Ira Greenberg Hon. John Samuelson Also present were: Hon. Joseph Lhota, Board Chairman Andy Byford, President Joel Andrews, Vice President, EEO and Diversity James Bromfield, Director, System Safety Peter Cafiero, Chief, Operations Planning Edward Delatorre, Chief, NYPD Transit Bureau Robert Diehl, Vice President, Department of Security Jonathan Hawkins, Principal Transportation Planner, Operations Planning James Henly, Vice President and General Counsel, Law Mark Holmes, Chief Officer, Operations Planning, MTA Bus Frank Jezycki, Acting Senior Vice President, Subways ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 4 of 276 - New York City Transit and Bus Committee Meeting 5/21/2018 Sarah Meyer, Chief Customer Officer John O’Grady, Senior Vice President, Capital Program Management Jaibala Patel, Chief, Office of Management and Budget Stephen Plochochi, Senior Vice President, Operations Support, Materiel Darryl Irick, President MTA Bus Company & Senior Vice President NYCT Buses Janno Lieber, MTA Chief Development Officer, MTA Capital Construction I. Chairman Ferrer opened the meeting. II. Public Speakers Omar Vera expressed enthusiasm over the new double decker buses. He advocated for terminating the M4 Bus at 29th Street and 6th Avenue. Jason Pinero also expressed enthusiasm over the new double decker buses. He advocated for cleaner subway tracks and stations. Tabitha Decker, from Transit Center, stated she is looking forward to an ambitious and comprehensive Bus Plan. She advocated for all-door boarding and a plan to re-design routes system-wide. Stephanie Vieras, from Rider’s Alliance, stated an ambitious new Bus Plan will help people escape poverty. Nick Cifuentes, Executive Director, Tristate Transportation Campaign, also expressed enthusiasm for the new Bus Plan. Jackie Cohen, Campaign Coordinator for the NYPIRG Straphangers’ Campaign, expressed support for the Bus Plan. Murray Bodin stated there is a need for change and more teamwork among the various transportation agencies. Pedro Valdez Rivera expressed frustration regarding unreliability on the B38 Bus. He stated he looks forward to the Bus Plan. Jean Ryan, from Disabled in Action, stated she did not see any mention of wheelchair riders in the Bus Plan. Noting an instance in which a bus operator had refused service and another where a bus operator lacked knowledge of how to operate equipment, she advocated for better accessibility for wheelchair users and in particular, using a different model express bus that is more accessible. William Henderson stated he is looking forward to the presentation of the Bus Plan. He noted three factors that he believes are critical to the Plan’s success: (1) the Plan must deal with reality and not past conditions, by addressing congestion; (2) the Plan must embrace changing ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 5 of 276 - New York City Transit and Bus Committee Meeting 5/21/2018 technology; and (3) the Plan must treat all riders fairly, meaning the burden of fare payment must be borne by all riders. III. Minutes and Work Plan Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Committee approved the minutes of the March 19, 2018 meeting of the MTA New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority, Capital Construction Company and Bus Company. There were no changes to the work plan. IV. Agenda Items Following an introduction by President Byford, Darryl Irick, SVP NYCT Buses and President of MTA Bus, presented the Bus Plan. Member Albert inquired how the issue of poorly performing bus routes will be addressed. Mr. Irick stated all 326 routes will be evaluated. President Byford added NYCT will deploy resources quickly to known trouble spots. Member Albert asked whether seasonal adjustments to the routes will continue. President Byford responded in the affirmative. Member Albert asked for clarification regarding the Transit Priority Traffic Teams. President Irick responded these may include the NYPD in addition to NYCT personnel, noting that these details remain to be worked out. President Byford added the NYPD cannot be everywhere and consequently, the addition of camera enforcement is imperative. Member Albert asked which closely spaced stops are planned for elimination. Peter Cafiero, Chief, Operations Planning, responded that in Staten Island, NYCT is exploring eliminating every other stop. In particular, NYCT will take into consideration the ridership at each stop and factors such as stops in areas with large numbers of senior citizens. Member Albert inquired if certain routes are eliminated from the new bus maps, as proposed, would riders know other routes exist. President Irick stated that neighborhood maps will show all the bus routes in each neighborhood. President Byford added the Chief Customer Officer will be tasked with making sure the customers’ point of view is considered when designing the maps. He reiterated Mr. Cafiero’s statements that areas of vulnerable residents will be given special consideration. Member Vanterpool stated that congestion must be addressed in a concerted way and that NYPD needs to be more involved with enforcement. She expressed the need for more dedicated bus lanes, citing the example of the B82, and noted that the needs of bus riders can be drowned out by small numbers of individuals who oppose improvements to bus service. ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 6 of 276 - New York City Transit and Bus Committee Meeting 5/21/2018 Member Vanterpool also urged that NYCT be a stronger proponent of congestion pricing and bus camera enforcement. Member Moerdler made the following suggestions relating to bus operations: (1) Community Boards should be better utilized, including by advising these Boards in advance of changes to bus schedules; (2) Uber vehicles and cabs should be prevented from using bus lanes; (3) NYC-imposed constraints on traffic need to be re-examined, noting that such constraints can mean six lanes are turned into two, resulting in cars moving into bus lanes; (4) Double-parked vehicles should be continually ticketed and not afforded a three hour grace period from a previous ticket; (5) Vehicles parked in bus stops
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fiscal Year 2017 Statement of Community District Needs and Community Board Budget Requests
    Fiscal Year 2017 Statement of Community District Needs and Community Board Budget Requests for Staten Island Community Board 2 Submitted to the Department of City Planning December 2015 LETTER FROM THE COMMUNITY BOARD LETTER FROM THE COMMUNITY BOARD TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1. Community Board Information 2. Overview of Community District 3. Main Issues 4. Summary of Community District Needs and Community Board Budget Requests 4.1. Health Care and Human Service Needs and Requests 4.1.1 Community District Needs and Requests Related to Health Care Facilities and Programming 4.1.2 Community District Needs and Requests Related to Facilities and Programming for Older New Yorkers 4.1.3 Community District Needs and Requests Related to Facilities and Services for the Homeless 4.1.4 Community District Needs and Requests Related to Services and Programming for Low-Income and Vulnerable New Yorkers 4.2. Youth, Education and Child Welfare Needs and Requests 4.2.1 Community District Needs and Requests Related to Educational Facilities and Programs 4.2.2 Community District Needs and Requests Related to Services for Children and Child Welfare 4.2.3 Community District Needs and Requests Related to Youth and Community Services and Programs 4.3. Public Safety Needs and Requests 4.3.1 Community District Needs and Requests Related to Policing and Crime 4.3.2 Community District Needs and Requests Related to Emergency Services 4.4. Core Infrastructure and City Services Needs and Requests 4.4.1 Community District Needs and Requests Related to Water, Sewers and Environmental Protection 4.4.2 Community District Needs and Requests Related to Sanitation Services 4.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Square 14Th Street District Vision Plan
    UNION SQUARE 14TH STREET DISTRICT VISION PLAN DESIGN PARTNER JANUARY 2021 In dedication to the Union Square-14th Street community, and all who contributed to the Visioning process. This is just the beginning. We look forward to future engagement with our neighborhood and agency partners as we move forward in our planning, programming, and design initiatives to bring this vision to reality. Lynne Brown William Abramson Jennifer Falk Ed Janoff President + Co-Chair Co-Chair Executive Director Deputy Director CONTENTS Preface 7 Introduction 8 Union Square: Past, Present and Future 15 The Vision 31 Vision Goals Major Projects Park Infrastructure Streetscape Toolkit Implementation 93 Conclusion 102 Appendix 107 Community Engagement Transit Considerations 4 UNION SQUARE PARTNERSHIP | VISIONING PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 6 UNION SQUARE PARTNERSHIP | VISIONING PLAN Photo: Jane Kratochvil A NEW ERA FOR UNION SQUARE DEAR FRIENDS, For 45 years, the Union Square Partnership has been improving the neighborhood for our 75,000 residents, 150,000 daily workers, and millions of annual visitors. Our efforts in sanitation, security, horticulture, and placemaking have sustained and accelerated growth for decades. But our neighborhood’s growth is not over. With more than 1 million square feet of planned development underway, it is time to re-invest for tomorrow. The projects and programs detailed in the Union Square-14th Street District Vision Plan will not just focus on the neighborhood’s competitive advantage but continue to make the area a resource for all New Yorkers for generations to come. This plan is a jumping-off point for collaboration with our constituents. At its center, the vision proposes a dramatic 33% expansion of public space.
    [Show full text]
  • C 180263 Zsm-110 East 16Th Street
    CITY PLANNING COMMISSION August 22, 2018/Calendar No. 16 C 180263 ZSM CORRECTED IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by East 16th Street Owner LLC and Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, Inc. pursuant to Sections 197-c and 201 of the New York City Charter for the grant of a special permit pursuant to Section 74-711 of the Zoning Resolution to modify the height and setback regulations of Section 23-662 (Maximum height of buildings and setback regulations), side yard regulations of Section 23-4621 (Side yards for all other buildings containing residences), and distance between buildings regulations of Section 23-711 (Standard minimum distance between buildings) to facilitate the development of a 21-story mixed-use building, on a zoning lot containing a landmark designated by the Landmarks Preservation Commission, on property located at 109-115 East 15th Street a.k.a. 110-112 East 16th Street (Block 871, Lots 10, 12, and 74), in a C2-6A district, Borough of Manhattan, Community District 5. * *197-d(2)(B) eligible This application for the grant of a special permit pursuant to Section 74-711 of the Zoning Resolution (ZR) was submitted by East 16th Street Owner LLC and Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana, Inc. on February 16, 2018. The applicants request modification of the height and setback regulations of ZR Section 23-662, the side yard regulations of ZR Section 23-4622 and the distance between buildings regulations of ZR Section 23-711. Along with the related application for a second special permit, the requested action would facilitate the development of a 21-story mixed-use building on property located at 110 East 16th Street, in Manhattan Community District 5.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT) Decreased to 793
    Appendix A BRIDGE CAPITAL PROGRAM East River Bridge Rehabilitation Plans A-1 Bridges Under Construction A-2 Component Rehabilitation A-3 Bridges Under Design A-4 216 2017 BRIDGES AND TUNNELS ANNUAL CONDITION REPORT APPENDIX A-1 MANHATTAN BRIDGE REHABILITATION ITEMS TOTAL ESTIMATED COST Est. Cost ($ in millions) Repair floor beams. (1982) 0.70* Replace inspection platforms, subway stringers on approach spans. (1985) 6.30* Install truss supports on suspended spans. (1985) 0.50* Partial rehabilitation of walkway. (1989) 3.00* Rehabilitate truss hangers on east side of bridge. (1989) 0.70* Install anti-torsional fix (side spans) and rehabilitate upper roadway decks on approach spans on east side; replace drainage system on approach spans, install new lighting on entire upper roadways east side, including purchase of fabricated material for west side of bridge. (1989) 40.30* Eyebar rehabilitation - Manhattan anchorage Chamber “C.” (1988) 12.20* Replacement of maintenance platform in the suspended span. (1982) 4.27* Reconstruct maintenance inspection platforms, including new rail and hanger systems and new electrical and mechanical systems; over 2,000 interim repairs to structural steel support system of lower roadway for future functioning of roadway as a detour during later construction contracts. (1992) 23.50* Install anti-torsional fix on west side (main and side spans); west upper roadway decks, replace drainage systems on west suspended and approach spans; walkway rehabilitation (install fencing, new lighting on west upper roadways
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 3 – Impact Analyses
    2.6 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 2.6 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 2.6.1 INTRODUCTION Historic and cultural resources include both archaeological and historic architectural resources, and are defined in the CEQR Technical Manual as districts, buildings, structures, sites, and objects of historical, aesthetic, cultural, and archaeological importance. This includes resources listed in the State/National Registers of Historic Places (“S/NRHP”), resources determined eligible for listing in the S/NRHP by the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation (“OPRHP”), landmarks designated or under consideration for designation by the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission (“NYCLPC”), National Historic Landmarks (“NHL”), National Monuments, and previously unidentified resources that meet the S/NRHP and/or NYCLPC eligibility requirements. The CEQR Technical Manual recommends that a historic and cultural resources impacts assessment be conducted for projects that would result in ground disturbance, new construction, physical alterations to existing structures, and/or change in scale, visual prominence or visual context of buildings, structures, or landscape features, among others. The Proposed Project involves the development of an approximately 66-acre Development Area located in Charleston, Staten Island, with parkland, retail, residential, and community facility uses, along with the mapping as parkland of an existing 20-acre Conservation Area, and the mapping and construction of new streets, including approximately 6-acres for the construction of Englewood Avenue. The overall Project Area of approximately 93 acres is generally bounded to the north by the future northern limit of Englewood Avenue and present-day Clay Pit Ponds State Park Preserve (CPPSPP), to the south and east by Veterans Road West, and to the west by Arthur Kill Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Sirtoa Operating Rules and Timetable Special Instructions
    Metropolitan Transportation Authority Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority Staten Island Railway SIRTOA OPERATING RULES AND TIMETABLE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS John H. McCabe Chief Officer – General Manager Prepared By: Metropolitan Transportation Authority Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating Authority Staten Island Railway SIRTOA OPERATING RULES FIRST EDITION In Effect 12:01 AM, Saturday, September 4, 2004 John H. McCabe Chief Officer – General Manager Prepared By: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL NOTICE..............................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Safety is First and Paramount .........................................................................................1-2 2.0 TERMINOLOGY, DEFINITIONS, and AUTHORIZED ABBREVIATIONS..................... 2-1 3.0 GENERAL RULES................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Required Documents.......................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Rules and Special Instructions........................................................................................3-1 3.3 Required Examinations...................................................................................................3-2 3.4 Employee Conduct..........................................................................................................3-3 3.5 Prohibited Behavior........................................................................................................3-3
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australia
    Bibliothek/Librarydes Forschungszentrums Jülich 8, Teil 11 Schriften Reihe Band Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek Kompendium Information Teil II Ausbildungsstätten, Fort- und Weiterbildungsaktivitäten, Informationsdienste, Presse- und Nachrichtenagenturen, Verlagswesen und Buchhandel, Einrichtungen des Patent- und Normungswesen, Publikationen Gertrud Steuer Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich Reihe Bibliothek/Library Band 8, Teil II ISSN 1433-5557 ISBN 3-89336-286-X Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Steuer, Gertrud : Kompendium Information / Gertrud Steuer . - Jülich : Forschungszentrum, Zentralbibliothek, 2001 (Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich . Reihe Bibliothek , Band 8) ISBN 3-89336-286-X Herausgeber Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH und Vertrieb : ZENTRALBIBLIOTHEK D-52425 Jülich Telefon (02461) 61-5368 - Telefax (02461) 61-6103 e-mail: [email protected] e Internet : http ://www.fz-juelich .de/zb Umschlaggestaltung : Grafische Betriebe, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Druck: Grafische Betriebe, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Copyright: Forschungszentrum Jülich 2001 Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich Reihe Bibliothek/Library Band 8, Teil II ISSN 1433-5557 ISBN 3-89336-286-X Alle Rechte vorbehalten . Kein Teil des Werkes darf in irgendeiner Form (Druck, Fotokopie oder in einem anderen Verfahren) ohne schriftliche Genehmigung des Verlages reproduziert oder unter Verwendung elektronischer Systeme verarbeitet, vervielfältigt oder verbreitet werden . Inhaltsverzeichnis Teil I 1Vorwort 5 2 Einleitung
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION The New York City Economic Development Corporation (“NYCEDC”), on behalf of the City of New York, is proposing the development of an approximately 66-acre parcel (the “Development Area”), located in Charleston, Staten Island, with parkland, retail, residential, and community facility uses and the mapping and construction of new public streets. In addition, NYCEDC is seeking to map as parkland an existing approximately 20-acre Conservation Area, which is located adjacent to the 66-acre Development Area and to map adjacent privately-owned streets. The overall proposed project is referred to as the Charleston Mixed-Use Development (the “Proposed Project”). The Development Area, the Conservation Area and existing private streets to be mapped, constitute the “Project Area”. The Project Area encompasses approximately 93 acres, including the mapping of streets, utility corridors and the Conservation Area. The Project Area is generally bounded to the north by the future northern limit of Englewood Avenue and Clay Pit Ponds State Park Preserve (“CPPSPP”), to the south and east by Veterans Road West, to the west by Arthur Kill Road, and to the south by the shopping center known as the Bricktown Centre at Charleston Mall (“Bricktown Centre”). The Charleston Mixed-Use Development consists of a number of discrete project elements that would be undertaken by different entities. The area is divided into the following development parcels: • Parkland: The NYC Department of Parks and Recreation (“NYCDPR”) would map and develop an approximately 23-acre park site (Fairview Park) with areas for both active and passive recreation. Adjacent to this 23-acre new park that would be mapped, the existing approximately 20-acre Conservation Area would be mapped as parkland, creating approximately 43 acres of contiguous mapped parkland.
    [Show full text]
  • C 180203 ZSM-EAST 14Th STREET and IRVING PLACE
    CITY PLANNING COMMISSION June 27, 2018/Calendar No. 14 C 180203 ZSM IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by Fourteenth at Irving, LLC pursuant to Sections 197-c and 201 of the New York City Charter for the grant of a special permit pursuant to Section 74-721 of the Zoning Resolution to modify the rear yard regulations of Section 23-53 (Rear Yards) and the height and setback regulations of Section 33-43 (Maximum Height of Walls and Required Setbacks) to facilitate the development of a 21-story commercial building on property located at 124 East 14th Street (Block 559, Lots 16 & 55), in a C6-4 District, partially within the Special Union Square District, Borough of Manhattan, Community District 3. This application for a special permit was filed by Fourteenth at Irving, LLC and the NYC Economic Development Corporation (EDC) on January 3, 2018. The applicant proposes to modify the rear yard equivalent and height and setback requirements of the C6-4 zoning district. This application, along with the related actions, would facilitate the redevelopment of City-owned property with a 21-story, 209,246-square-foot technology-focused office and retail commercial building located at 124 East 14th Street in the Union Square neighborhood of Community District 3 in Manhattan. RELATED ACTIONS In addition to the special permit (C 180203 ZSM) that is the subject of this report, implementation of the proposed development also requires action by the City Planning Commission on the following applications, which are being considered concurrently with this application: N 180202 ZRM Zoning text amendments to designate a Mandatory Inclusionary Housing (MIH) area and to modify bulk regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 3 – Impact Analyses
    2.13 TRANSPORTATION 2.13.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the Proposed Action’s potential impact on traffic, parking, transit, and pedestrian facilities in the vicinity of the Project Area. As described in Chapter 1.0, “Project Description,” the Project Area contains a Development Area that has five different components that would generate new travel demand to the surrounding streets and would create new traffic, parking, transit, and pedestrian demands. The five components of the Development Area that would generate travel demand as a result of the Proposed Action include up to 195,000 square feet of medium- to large-format retail on Retail Site “A” (11.01 acres), 90,000 square feet of neighborhood retail on Retail Site “B” (7.28 acres), a 15,000 square-foot library on Retail Site “A”, a residential use with 162 units of senior housing (9.06 acres), a 750-seat elementary/middle school (5.88 acres) and a 23.53 acre park (Fairview Park). The mapping and construction of Englewood Avenue as a new east-west connection between Arthur Kill Road and Veterans Road West is proposed for the Development Area, which would provide access to the proposed school and senior housing sites. Project elements in the Development Area would be constructed over an approximately 7-year period. The potential for transportation impacts are assessed for both a 2015 and a 2020 analysis year. The 2015 analysis would include the development of Retail Site “A”, the library, and Fairview Park, while the 2020 analysis would include the development of Retail Site “B”, the school and the senior housing.
    [Show full text]
  • People Converge, and Interests Compete - the New York Times
    10/16/2017 People Converge, and Interests Compete - The New York Times REAL ESTATE | LIVING AROUND | UNION SQUARE People Converge, and Interests Compete By C. J. HUGHES DEC. 26, 2008 UNION SQUARE PARK wasn’t named to honor the labor movement — or the winning side in the Civil War, for that matter. The label has more prosaic origins: when city planners laid out the square in the 1830s, it sat at the union of three major roads, where stagecoaches picked up routes leading to Albany or Boston. The traffic that circumnavigates its thumb-shaped green space these days has slightly less room to maneuver. Over the last two decades, New York has gradually increased the park’s size to its present 3.6 acres by adding castoff lots and absorbing parts of streets. The change has been one factor turning the park — with its statues of former presidents, long lines of benches and rows of thick oaks — into a destination spot. Yet when vehicles converge on one spot, there can be collisions, and the same is true of interests at the square. One example is the battle over its $20 million renovation. The Union Square Partnership, a coalition of 100 businesses, has a plan to restore a Classical-style pavilion at the northern end to accommodate a seasonal restaurant. (An earlier restaurant, in intermittent operation for almost a decade, had been next to the pavilion rather than inside it.) The Union Square Community Coalition, formed in 1980, opposes that plan and has sued to stop it. This month, a state Supreme Court judge began hearing arguments.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the David Hadley Rockwell New York Disco Ephemera Collection
    Guide to the David Hadley Rockwell New York Disco Ephemera Collection NMAH.AC.1342 Franklin A. Robinson, Jr. 2016 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 5 Series 1: Venue Advertisments and Invitations, 1983-2004, undated...................... 5 Series 2: Correspondence and Personal, 1988-2000, undated............................. 39 Series 3: Other Advertisements and Ephemera, 1983-2002, undated................... 40 David Hadley Rockwell New York Disco Ephemera Collection, NMAH.AC.1342 Collection Overview Repository:
    [Show full text]