The Life of Sir Thomas More, by His Great-Grandson, Thomas More, Was First Printed in the Succeed- Ing Year

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Life of Sir Thomas More, by His Great-Grandson, Thomas More, Was First Printed in the Succeed- Ing Year Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Ottawa http://www.archive.org/details/lifeofsirthomasOOrope "^•^•^••^s^ j \o It 5jjv TH LIFE DIS£A&X>EE> OF SIR THOMAS MORE, BY HIS SON-IN-LAW, WILLIAM ROPER, ESQ. WITH NOTES, AND AN APPENDIX OF LETTERS. ,^V^£nE1^$DITI0N, REVISED AND CORRECTED, ?**$.l&k *#; TsY s. w. singer. CHISWICK: FROM THE PRESS OF C. WHITTINGHAM, FOR R.jTl^i'LJOQJ^, OLD BOND STREET, LONDON. < 0' \ AUG 2 8 1984 THE EDITOR'S PREFACE. About five years since I had the pleasure of recommending this delightful piece of genuine biography to the attention of those who are gra- tified by authentic pictures of ancient manners and ancient virtues. The very limited impression then published was received in the most flatter- ing manner, and copies have now for some time ranked among the number of scarce books. More than one literary journal of eminence gave its approving voice, and recommended the repro- duction of this biographical gem in a form which would give it more extensive circulation. I have at length listened to the suggestion, and my good fortune has enabled me very much to amend the text by the collation of two manuscript copies. One of these, in the handwriting of Roper's age, has come into my possession since the former edition was printed; for the collation of the other I am indebted to the polite attention a 2 : vi editor's preface. of Sir William Strickland, Baronet, of Boynton, in Yorkshire ; who was kind enough to furnish me with it : a favour conveyed in the most agree- able manner, as it came unsolicited, and which I have much pleasure in gratefully acknow- ledging *. The first edition of this little book is of great rarity : it bears the date of Paris, 1626, but was probably printed in England. It was then not uncommon for books which favoured Catholic doctrines to have a foreign imprint, even when not printed abroad. It is remarkable that the Life of Sir Thomas More, by his great-grandson, Thomas More, was first printed in the succeed- ing year. In 1716, Thomas Hearne, the celebrated anti- quary, gave to the world another impression, and boasts of having had the choice of several manu- script copies ; he does not however seem to have been fortunate in the one he selected, but he has followed it most scrupulously in every particular, errors and redundancies not excepted. His va- rious readings at the end of the volume offer many emendations, of which he, perhaps with too punctilious accuracy, omitted to avail himself in the construction of his text. * Opposite the first page of Sir William Strickland's manuscript, are emblazoned the arms of Leigh and Egerton ; beneath them are seven lines referring to the arms, and complimenting the bearer of them : these are signed Fra "Wynne. The manuscript is in the handwriting of the period at which Roper lived. editor's preface. vii In 1729, the Rev. John Lewis, well known by his Life of Caxton and other autiquarian publica- tions, again committed it to the press ; upon the whole his edition may be pronounced superior to either of the former, yet it is not without its defects. The manuscript from which Lewis printed was lent him by Mr. Thomas Beake of Stourmouth, in Kent, and appears in many in- stances to have deserved the preference over those collated by Hearne ; but this is not always the case, and it frequently happens that where the sense in the latter is simple and obvious, Mr. Beake's MS, has it involved and obscure. Mr. Lewis's edition was again printed in Lon- don in 1731, and in Dublin in 1765. It was from a collation of the printed copies with Lewis's manuscript collections for his edition, I prepared that which I published in 1817. Upon the present occasion I have carefully revised the text by a comparison of the two manuscripts mentioned above with my former edition, and the result has been the correction of many errors, some of which materially affected the sense. I have in this instance been in- duced to reform the unsettled and wretched ortho- graphy and punctuation, so as to render this edition acceptable to the general reader, for whom it is more particularly designed ; at the same time I beg to assure the literary antiquary that it has been done with proper caution, and that the ; viii editor's preface. colour of the style will not be found changed by this innovation. In the present, as in the former impression, I have given that part of Hearne's Latin preface to his edition of this work which has relation to it also Mr. Lewis's preface, and the Dedication to the first edition by its anonymous editor T. P. It should appear that Mr. Roper compiled this life about the close of Queen Mary's reign (A.D. 1557), when Sir Thomas More's English Works were first collected and printed, at the queen's instance, by his nephew, Mr. Justice Rastall. Perhaps it was not ready for the press before the death of Mary, and it is obvious why it was not printed during the reign of her suc- cessor. Like other books of a Catholic tendency it was handed about in manuscript, and in the course of frequent transcripts the text became very much corrupted. It is hoped that the two excellent manuscripts which have been collated for this edition may have restored the text to nearly its original integrity. The Appendix has received some further aug- mentation which I think will be found acceptable ; and here I have continued the old spelling and pointing, because the letters are taken from the printed copy of Sir Thomas More's works, which Dr. Johnson thought might " be better trusted than any English book of that or the preceding EDITOR S PREFACE. IX age." Some additions have also been made to the notes in the present edition. A beautiful reduced copy of the exquisite draw- ing by Holbein, in the collection of his late Majesty, has been added, as giving the most au- thentic idea of Sir Thomas More's person*, and therefore the most appropriate accompaniment to this interesting delineation of his life and virtues. The following minute description of his person and habits, said to be " according to the relation of those who best knew him," may be no unac- ceptable addition to the article in the Appendix. " Sir Thomas More was no tall man; all the parts of his body were in good proportion, and congruous as man could wish. His skin was something white ; the colour of his face drew rather to whiteness than to paleness, far from * The picture of the More family, described in Hearne's preface, and in No. XVII of the Appendix, has been about the last fourteen years at Nostall, in Yorkshire, the seat of Mr. Winn. Sir Win. Strickland informs me that he be- r lieves it is now in the same state as when it came from W ell Hall, in Essex, except that it has lately been judiciously repaired in some few immaterial places, which has neither altered or injured it in the least. The picture is as perfect as any picture of that age can be, though some of the faces of the female figures do appear a little faded. It appears that Hearne must have been in error when he asserted that part of it had been painted over again by some inferior artist, for a person well skilled in pictures asserts that there is no appearance of that having been the case. The picture which is mentioned as being in the possession of the Lenthal family, and which is still probably at Burford, seems to have been in part copied from the former, but apparently not by the hand of Holbein, and there are additions which bring it down a generation or two lower. X EDITOR S PREFACE. redness, saving that some little red sparkes every where appeared. His hair was blackish yellow, or rather yellow blackish, his beard thin ; his eyes grey and speckled, which kind of eyes do commonly betoken a good and sharp wit, and as physicians say are least cumber'd with diseases and faults ; his were not great, nor yet glittering, yet much pleasing. His countenance was con- formable to his nature and disposition, pleasant and amiable, somewhat resembling to the fashion of one that would seem to smile. His voice was neither boisterous nor big, nor yet too small and shrill; he spake his words very distinctly and treatably, without any manner of hastiness or stuttering; and albeit he delighted in all kind of melody, yet he seemed not of his own nature to be apt to sing himself. He enjoyed the health of his body very well : and although he was never a strong man, yet he was able to go through with any labour and pains meet and convenient for him to dispatch his business. A little before he gave over his office of Lord Chancellor, he began to be troubled with a little sickness, and after he was shut up in the Tower it much increased. When he was a young man, he used and delighted in drinking of water ; his common drink wa,s very small ale ; and as for wine he did but sip of it, and that only for company's sake, or for pledging his friends. He delighted more to feed on beef, and salt meats, coarse bread, and that very well leavened, than upon fine meats and bread.
Recommended publications
  • William Roperroper----2267622676 6 Feb 2011 Page 1
    Descendants of William RoperRoper----2267622676 6 Feb 2011 Page 1 1. William RoperRoper----2267622676 (b.1498(b.1498----Canterbury,,Kent,England;d.4Canterbury,,Kent,England;d.4 Jan 1577/15781577/1578----Canterbury,,Kent,England)Canterbury,,Kent,England) sp: Margaret More-22678 (b.1505-Chelsea,,Kent,England;m.2 Jul 1521;d.Abt 25 Dec 1544-Butclose,,Kent,England) 2. Margaret Roper-22683 (b.Abt 1523-Eltham,,Kent,England;d.Aft 1577) sp: William Dawtrey-25482 (b.Abt 1526-Petworth,,Suss,England;m.Abt 1547;d.Abt 1590-Petworth,,Suss,England) 3. William Dawtrey Jr-25483 (b.Abt 1548-Petworth,,Suss,England;d.16 Sep 1589) sp: Dorothy Stanley-35949 (b.Abt 1553-Warwick,,England;m.20 Aug 1574) 4. Henry Dawtrey-35950 (b.Abt 1578-Petworth,,Suss,England) sp: Anne Dunne-35953 (b.Abt 1580-Theydon Gernon,,Essex,England;m.Abt 1620;d.23 Feb 1623/1624) 5. Henry Dawtrey-35956 (b.30 Apr 1621-Petworth,,Suss,England) 5. William Dawtrey-35957 (b.1 Jan 1623/1624-Petworth,,Suss,England;d.Abt 4 Nov 1679) sp: Amy Strutt-35967 (b.Abt 1626-Great Warley,,Essex,England;m.25 Apr 1650) 6. Thomas Dawtrey-35968 (b.Abt 1652-Petworth,,Suss,England;d.Abt 11 Oct 1732) sp: Sarah Bright-35970 (m.28 Nov 1677) 7. William Dawtrey-35971 (b.8 Nov 1678-Petworth,,Suss,England;d.26 Aug 1758-Petworth,,Suss,England) 7. Sarah Dawtrey-35972 (b.Abt 1679-Petworth,,Suss,England) sp: Edward Luther-35973 8. William Luther-35974 8. Richard Luther-35975 (d.28 Dec 1767-Vicars Hill,,,England) sp: Charlotte Chamberlen-35976 (d.1 Feb 1776-Bath,,,England) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • OPENING of the ROPER VAULT in St. Dunstan's Canterbury and Thoughts on the Burial of William and Margaret Roper
    OPENING OF THE ROPER VAULT in St. Dunstan's Canterbury and thoughts on the burial of William and Margaret Roper. by Hugh O. Albin From Saturday 15 July until Wednesday 26 July 1978, the vault of the Roper family remained open in St. Dunstan's Church, Canterbury, for the purpose of making a complete record of its contents. This first archaeological survey ever made was arranged by me to mark the 500th anniversary of the birth of Sir Thomas More. The work was carried out by members of the Canterbury Archaeological Trust under their director Tim Tatton-Brown in conjunction with the church architect Peter Marsh, whose Dutch assistant, Henk Strik made detailed drawings of the Chapel and vault, as well as a complete photographic record. The archaeological report tells us that the present Roper chantry chapel attached to the south-east side of St. Dunstan's Church is almost entirely the building that was erected circa 1524. Of the first chapel, built in 1402, there probably remain only the three arches, one on the west and two on the north, which join the chapel to the main church building. The pilgrim looking at the outside of the Roper Chapel should notice that it is made of fine red bricks with Caen stone quoins and window surrounds. The windows are all typical of the early 16th century. The bricks are large (6.5 x 12 x 25 cms) and each laid entirely in an English bond. Red brickwork of this type does not occur commonly in Canterbury until the late 15th century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family and Descendants of Sir Thomas More
    The Family and Descendants of Sir Thomas More Grandparents: William More and Johanna Joye: William was a Citizen and Baker of London. He died in 1469. Johanna (d.1470) was the daughter of John Joye, a Citizen and Brewer of London and his wife Johanna, daughter of John Leycester, a Chancery Clerk. Due to the seizure of family documents by Henry VIII following Thomas More‟s execution his ancestry cannot be traced back further than this. He referred to himself as “a Londoner born, of no noble family, but of honest stock”. [Note: It has sometimes been claimed that Sir John More, Thomas More‟s father, said that his ancestors came from Ireland. However, what he actually said was that his ancestors “either came out of the Mores of Ireland, or they came out of us”. No records of any Irish links have been discovered.] Parents: Sir John More (c.1451-1530) and Agnes Graunger (d.1499): John and Agnes were married in the church of St Giles without Cripplegate, London, on 24th April 1474. Agnes was the daughter of Thomas Graunger, an Alderman of London and a Merchant of the Staple of Calais. Agnes was John More‟s first wife, and the mother of all his children. Agnes died in 1499 and was buried in the Church of St. Michael Bassishaw, London. After her death John More married again three times. His second wife was Joan Marshall (the widow of John Marshall) who died in 1505. His third wife was Joan Bowes (the widow of Thomas Bowes) who died in 1520.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The early career op Christopher Goodman and his place in the development of English protestant thought Dawson, Jane E. A. How to cite: Dawson, Jane E. A. (1978) The early career op Christopher Goodman and his place in the development of English protestant thought, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8005/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 THE EAPiY CAREER OP CHRISTOPHER GOODMAN AND HIS PLACE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH PROTESTANT THOUGHT JANE E. A. DAWSON Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Durham 1978 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. JANE E.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Death of Sir Thomas More, Knight by Nicholas Harpsfield
    The Life and Death of Sir Thomas More, Knight by Nicholas Harpsfield icholas Harpsfield (1519–1575) com- Clements, and the Rastells. With Mary’s ac- Npleted this biography ca. 1557, during cession to the throne in 1553, he returned and the reign of Queen Mary, but it was not pub- became archdeacon of Canterbury and worked lished until 1932. Indebted to William Rop- closely with Cardinal Reginald Pole, the Arch- er’s recollections, Harpsfield’s Life presents bishop of Canterbury. With Mary’s and Pole’s More as both a spiritual and secular figure, and deaths in 1558, and with his refusal to take the Harpsfield dedicates his biography to William oath recognizing Queen Elizabeth’s suprem- Roper, presenting More as the first English acy, Harpsfield was imprisoned from 1559 to martyr among the laity, who serves as an “am- 1574 in Fleet Prison where, as he relates in his bassador” and “messenger” to them. Dedicatory Epistle, William Roper supported Harpsfield was born in London, and was ed- him generously. ucated at Winchester and then New College This edition of Harpsfield’s Life is based on at Oxford where he became a perpetual fellow the critical edition published for the Early En- and eventually earned a doctorate in canon glish Text Society (EETS) in 1932 by Oxford law. In 1550, during the reign of Edward VI, University Press, edited by E. V. Hitchcock; he moved to Louvain and come to know many the cross-references in the headnotes refer to in the More circle such as Antonio Bonvisi, the this edition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sadness of Christ, Mary Basset's 1557 Translation
    1 ST. THOMAS MORE’S HISTORY OF THE PASSION. Translated from the Latin by his granddaughter, MISTRESS MARY BASSET Edited in modern spelling with an Introduction by RIGHT REV. MGR. P. E. HALLETT LONDON BURNS OATES & WASHBOURNE LTD PUBLISHERS TO THE HOLY SEE NIHIL OBSTAT: LAURENTIUS P. EMERY, M.A., Censor Deputatus. IMPRIMATUR THOMAS, Archiepiscopus Birmingamiensis. BIRMINGAMIAE, die 31a Januarii, 1941. MADE AND PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN FOR BURNS OATES & WASHBOURNE LTD ​ ​ I94I 2 INTRODUCTION The History of the Passion closes the long list of works, both Latin and English, written by St. ​ ​ Thomas More. His imprisonment in the Tower lasted from April 17, 1534, to July 6, 1535, the day of his ​ ​ martyrdom. From the beginning he knew that he was never likely to regain his freedom and determined to make the best possible use of his time as a preparation for death. In all sincerity he expressed his satisfaction at obtaining so valuable a period of quiet and recollection for prayer and study. To Margaret Roper, his beloved daughter, he wrote of his appreciation of the grace of God that ‘hath also put in the king towards me that good and gracious mind, that as yet he hath taken from me nothing but my liberty, wherewith (as help me God) his grace hath done me great good by the spiritual profit that I trust I take thereby, that among all his great benefits heaped upon me so thick I reckon, upon my faith, my 1 imprisonment even the very chief.’ ​ Similarly on another occasion he said to her: ‘They that have put ​ me here ween they have done me a high displeasure.’..
    [Show full text]
  • Grade Twelve: Theology Course: Western Philosophy Text: a Man for All Seasons Author: Robert Bolt
    Grade Twelve: Theology Course: Western Philosophy Text: A Man for All Seasons Author: Robert Bolt Main Characters The Common Man Margaret More William Roper Sir Thomas More Cardinal Wolsey King Henry VIII Richard Rich Thomas Cromwell Cranmer, Archbishop of The Duke of Norfolk Signor Chapuys, the Canterbury Alice More Spanish Ambassador Character Reflections 1. Who is the Common Man? What different roles does he play? What do they all have in common? 2. What is Thomas More's occupation? What virtues is he known for? Describe his relationship with King Henry at the beginning of the play. 3. Who is King Henry VIII? What is his predicament? Why does this present a problem for his ministers? 4. How does Thomas More's family look at him? What is his relationship with his daughter, Margaret, like? 5. What is the nature of Thomas More's friendship with the Duke of Norfolk? How are they different from each other? How does their friendship change by the end of the play? 6. Who is Richard Rich? What advice does Thomas give him? Why does he refuse to take this advice? How does he “lose his innocence”? 7. Why does King Henry so greatly desire Thomas's approval of his divorce from Catherine of Aragon? 8. Why does Thomas refuse to share with his family and friends his opinion about the King's actions? 9. Who is William Roper? Why does Thomas initially refuse to give his daughter to him in marriage? In what way are he and Thomas very different? How are they the same? 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Thomas More (1478-1535)
    The following text was originally published in Prospects: the quarterly review of comparative education (Paris, UNESCO: International Bureau of Education), vol. XXIV, no. 1/2, 1994, p. 185–202 ©UNESCO:International Bureau of Education, 2000 This document may be reproduced free of charge as long as acknowledgement is made of the source SIR THOMAS MORE (1478-1535) Keith Watson1 Sir Thomas More, or more accurately Saint Thomas More, since he was beatified by the Roman Catholic Church in 1886 and canonized as a saint in 1935, has been variously described as ‘the most attractive figure of the early sixteenth century’,2 ‘the voice of conscience’ of the early English Reformation3 and ‘one of the three greatest figures of the English Renaissance’.4 He was a scholar, lawyer, theologian, statesman and eventual martyr, whose influence was less on the development of the Reformation in England as upon creating a particular genre of futuristic and idealistic writing about society. His most famous book, Utopia, has come to be accepted as an everyday term in the English language and ‘utopian’ is often used to refer to an idea or concept that is idealistic and highly desirable, but which at the same time is completely impracticable and unrealistic. In terms of political science, both liberals and socialists lay claim to Thomas More as a founder of some of their ideas. There has even been a room in the Kremlin devoted to Thomas More because of his apparent espousal of communism as a political ideal.5 He was born into a period of intense political and social turmoil in English history as the House of York was overthrown by Henry Tudor in 1485 and as a new, ruthless dynasty was established, a dynasty that was to have a profound influence not only on the future shape of Church/State relations, and consequently on the development of parliamentary democracy in England and Wales, but above all on the future development of the Reformation in England.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study Guide, with Theatrical Emphasis, for Robert Bolt's Play a Man for All Seasons For
    A Study Guide, with Theatrical Emphasis, For Meg for Robert Bolt’s Play A Man for All Seasons by Arthur Kincaid V. Questions for Discussion and Essay Writing…..….…....…105 Contents VI. List of Works Consulted……………….………..………..109 I. Introduction…………………………..……….………..….5 II. General Background 1. Thomas More…………………………..….……...……..6 2. Henry VIII and Thomas More…...……….…….….…..10 3. Renaissance Humanism…...……………....…….….…..12 4. Robert Bolt…………………………………...….…..…13 5. Theatrical Influences………………………….......…....15 III. Classroom & Theatre Performance 1. What Is Theatre?……………...………….….…….....…19 2. Aspects of a Play...……………………………………..22 3. Classroom Performance………...………………..…......30 4. Full Performance………………………………………31 5. Acting Exercises……………….……..………….....…..37 IV. Notes and Questions for Study and Performance 1. Act 1, A Man for All Seasons……………...…….....…..….47 2. Act 2, A Man for All Seasons……………....……..…....….74 5 www.thomasmorestudies.org Kincaid’s Guide: A Man for All Seasons 6 II. General Background I. Introduction 1. Sir Thomas More This guide is designed to give a performance orientation to the study of Robert Bolt’s A Man for All Seasons. It attempts to encourage teachers Nobody wants to be a hero. You go through life giving up and students to discover the work as a play to be performed. You can use parts of yourself – a hope, a dream, an ambition, a belief, a liking, this guide for inactive classroom study if you wish, but it would be much a piece of self-respect. But in every man there is something he more interesting and productive to use it as a stimulus to performance cannot give up and still remain himself – a core, an identity, a work of some sort, whether it be rehearsing a scene in class or a full thing that is summed up for him by the sound of his own name on his own ears.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Roper Basset's English Rendering Of
    Translating Devotion: Mary Roper Basset’s English Rendering of Thomas More’s De tristitia … Christi brenda m. hosington Université de Montréal/University of Warwick La dernière œuvre de Thomas More, composée en 1534–1535 dans la Tour de Londres alors qu’il attendait son exécution, retrace l’agonie du Christ à Gethsémani dans les heures précédant son arrestation. Le De tristitia, tedio, pauore, et oratione Christi ante captionem eius, texte d’une grande intensité dévotionnelle et émotionnelle, n’en est pas moins marqué par les traits d’esprit et l’humour ironique caractéristiques de More. L’œuvre est traduite en anglais quelque temps après le décès de More par sa petite-fille, Mary Roper, mais c’est seulement en 1557, après le mariage de cette dernière à James Basset, et alors qu’elle tient l’office de dame de compagnie (« lady of the privy chamber ») de la reine Marie Tudor, que la traduction est publiée. On la retrouve en effet dans l’édition des English Works de More par William Rastell (1557), qui présente Mary Basset comme une femme « tout à fait experte en latin et en anglais ». Bien que les notices biographiques et les ouvrages de référence sur l’écriture féminine anglaise à la Renaissance fassent mention de cette œuvre — quoique parfois de manière erronée —, ainsi que des passages tirés de l’Histoire de l’Église d’Eusèbe que Basset avait précédemment traduits en latin et en anglais, ces textes n’ont jamais été étudiés. Afin de remédier à cette situation, cet article offre dans un premier temps une analyse détaillée de l’œuvre remarquable que représente Of the sorowe, werinesse, feare, and prayer of Christ before hys taking.
    [Show full text]
  • Foxe's Book of Martyrs
    FOXE'S BOOK OF MARTYRS CHAPTER I - History of Christian Martyrs to the First General Persecutions Under Nero Christ our Savior, in the Gospel of St. Matthew, hearing the confession of Simon Peter, who, first of all other, openly acknowledged Him to be the Son of God, and perceiving the secret hand of His Father therein, called him (alluding to his name) a rock, upon which rock He would build His Church so strong that the gates of hell should not prevail against it. In which words three things are to be noted: First, that Christ will have a Church in this world. Secondly, that the same Church should mightily be impugned, not only by the world, but also by the uttermost strength and powers of all hell. And, thirdly, that the same Church, notwithstanding the uttermost of the devil and all his malice, should continue. Which prophecy of Christ we see wonderfully to be verified, insomuch that the whole course of the Church to this day may seem nothing else but a verifying of the said prophecy. First, that Christ hath set up a Church, needeth no declaration. Secondly, what force of princes, kings, monarchs, governors, and rulers of this world, with their subjects, publicly and privately, with all their strength and cunning, have bent themselves against this Church! And, thirdly, how the said Church, all this notwithstanding, hath yet endured and holden its own! What storms and tempests it hath overpast, wondrous it is to behold: for the more evident declaration whereof, I have addressed this present history, to the end, first, that the wonderful works of God in His Church might appear to His glory; also that, the continuance and proceedings of the Church, from time to time, being set forth, more knowledge and experience may redound thereby, to the profit of the reader and edification of Christian faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Aubrey of Llantrithyd: 1590-1856
    © 2007 by Jon Anthony Awbrey Dedicated to the Memory of Marvin Richard Awbrey 1911-1989 Whose Curiosity Inspired the Writing of this Book Table of Contents Preface...................................................................... ix Descent and Arms ................................................... xvi Awbrey of Abercynrig: 1300-1621 ................... 1 Dr. William Awbrey of Kew, 1529-1595 ............ 27 Awbrey of Tredomen: 1583-1656 ....................... 42 Aubrey of Llantrithyd: 1590-1856 ...................... 87 John Aubrey of Easton Pierce, 1626-1695 ......... 105 Aubrey of Clehonger: 1540-1803 ........................ 125 Awbrey of Ynyscedwin: 1586-1683 .................... 131 Awbrey of Llanelieu and Pennsylvania: 1600-1716135 Awbrey of Northern Virginia: 1659-1804 ......... 149 Awbrey of South Carolina: 1757-1800 .................... 236 Bibliography .................................................. 263 Index .......................................................................... 268 iii Illustrations Dr. William Aubrey & Abercynrig .................... after 26 Ynsycdewin House .............................................. after 131 Goose Creek Chapel, Awbrey’s Plantation and after 186 Samuel Awbrey ................................................... Noland House ...................................................... after 201 Awbrey of Ynyscedwin: 1586-1683 .................... after 131 iv Preface In an age of relatively static social mobility, the Aubrey/Awbrey family was distinguished by the fact that they
    [Show full text]