Programme Expo 40E Gb BAT:Mise En Page 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Programme Expo 40E Gb BAT:Mise En Page 1 Opening of Maison La Roche, photo Peter Willi, October 1970 31st July 1968 – 31st July 2008 A Foundation and a Modern Art Collection Fortieth Anniversary of the setting up of the Fondation Le Corbusier 15th April – 18th June 2008 Maison La Roche - Paris hile still only in his infancy With my wife’s agreement, I have “I here declare, for every eventuality, W as an architect and budding arranged to leave what I own to the that I leave everything that I possess artist, Charles-Edouard Jeanneret poor. to an administrative entity, the was already at an early age showing Now, what I own can at best be a will to achieve ambitious aims and used as something to light the fire “Fondation Le Corbusier”, or any a desire to leave behind him signifi- with. Here at 24 rue Nungesser et other meaningful form, which shall cant traces of his endeavour that Coli (and even at 35 Sèvres in a become a spiritual entity, that is, would outlast his earthly existence. cellar), I have substantial archives a continuation of the endeavour “Let life be something with a goal of all kinds: drawings, writings, and not merely an arrow speeding notes, travel diaries, albums, etc. pursued throughout a lifetime. toward death” he wrote to his I don’t want some hooligan happily ” Le Corbusier parents in 1910 (1). pillaging it all, and destroying series Note dated 13 January 1960 whose value depends on their being Having become Le Corbusier, complete. without direct heirs and driven by In other words, we’ll have to take a the fear that his carefully conserved look at my archives so as to make archives and works be scattered the most of them (to sell them, or after his death, he spent the last give them to people, institutions fifteen years of his life conceiving or museums). and implementing, down to its Conclusion: the aim of this letter smallest details, the project of a is to set you thinking and to request Foundation that would bear his name. you – when the time comes –to take immediate possession, or rather, Already in 1949, he had written, immediate control of my archives, in a letter addressed to his friend so as to protect them from being Jean-Jacques Duval, for whom he wrongfully scattered. built the Duval factory in Saint-Dié: And the present letter, with my signature, is to be used as (1) Letter of 2 October 1910. One can conk out at any time of documentary proof, for whatever (2) 30 April 1949, quoted in Jean-Jacques life. I’ve been talking about it to my purpose it may serve. Duval, Le Corbusier, l’écorce et la fleur, brother who is here on a visit. With my friendship and my gratitude (2). Paris, Éditions du Linteau, 2006. “…we’ll have to take a look at my archives so as to make the most of them […]”. Villa le Lac, Corseaux, photo Olivier-Martin Gambier, 2006 To pursue the question of the provisional deed of donation as a Early days Fondation Le Corbusier, I am sending sharp curb to take the wind out of you here the decisions taken with my any stranger’s sails. That’s what they Heavily involved in the big brother Albert on his visit last call the prudence and wisdom of building commissions that got under Sunday, 29 September. nations! way at the beginning of the fifties, Le 1°/ We have agreed that the little I mean this very seriously and I think Corbusier, although still concerned maison du Lac, and the land belonging it essential that these two steps with his project for a Foundation, no to it, which, as our father’s heirs, are should be taken right away - the longer had much time to devote to it. our jointly held property (under Swiss donation of the maison du Lac and law), could be made over directly to that of the house in the Square du It was only in 1957, shortly before his the Foundation, envisaged as having Docteur Blanche. 70th birthday, that he started thinking its legal business address in Switzer- about it again in more precise terms. land, to facilitate the succession or In making his project a reality, Le In a series of letters exchanged with the inheritance. Corbusier very rapidly sought the help of Gabriel Chéreau, a lawyer his friend the banker Jean-Pierre de 2°/ This little house would also be from Nantes and the legal consultant Montmollin, he requested the latter’s used as the “Fondation Albert who had defended him in the advice on determining the legal Jeanneret”, in which the consider- Marseilles trial and obtained for him status of the future Foundation. He able quantity of Albert Jeanneret’s the commission for the Unité d’habi- manuscripts would be conserved tation in Rezé. His job was to find an informed him of his intentions in a and which would be authorised to ideal legal set-up for the Foundation letter dated 1 October 1957. publish his musical works at any time and to draw up its statutes. Le in the future. Corbusier also called upon the skills of other outside experts, Alphonse 3°/ We need to find the relevant strat- Ducret, an engineer and the agem for divesting our two indivi- President of the Fédération duals, Albert Jeanneret and Le Internationale du Bâtiment, as well Corbusier, of the instant ownership as his lawyer, Maître Maguet. of the house (in case of one or the other’s decease), since we have no The archives left by Le Corbusier valid inheritors. attest to the increasing importance this project was taking in his life: 4°/ And what’s more, something that letters to his friends, to state officials, is always to be feared for old gentle- to foreign dignitaries; notes in his men of our age is falling into the carnets, various traces on sheets of clutches of femmes fatales with paper or cards (invitations, menus or exaggerated ideas about people’s programmes), texts typed in the fortunes and capable, with the Atelier, handwritten letters sent from talents Nature has given them, of Roquebrune-Cap-Martin, meetings in twisting round their little fingers one the apartment in rue Nungesser et or other of the septuagenarians in Coli… question. In other words, use this 2 • 31st July 1968 - 31st July 2008 A Foundation and a Modern Art Collection On the roof of the Nantes-Rezé Unité d’Habitation, Gabriel Chéreau, José-Luis Sert, André Wogenscky, Le Corbusier, photo Lucien Hervé but not adapted to the needs of the lities for locating the Foundation’s Groundwork future institution. headquarters. The different schemes Le Corbusier then began negotiations all included the Musée National d’Art Le Corbusier had begun by on two different fronts. On one hand, Moderne, where a large part of his defining his conception of the he succeeded in persuading his collection of paintings was deposi- Foundation’s missions at a very early friend Raoul La Roche, for whom he ted. Thus, in one of these schemes, stage, but he still had to draw up a had built the house in Square du he planned to present a selection of timetable of the legal steps needed Docteur Blanche and who had no works in Villa Savoye (“Musée for it to become a reality at the direct heirs, to donate the house to Corbu”), with the Foundation’s secre- appointed time. There were now four the Foundation. On the other, in his tariat being housed in Maison La major points that were to focus all his talks with André Malraux on the Roche. Paintings, sculptures and attention and that of his friends. restoration and future attribution of drawings would have been stored by Villa Savoye, which had just been the Musée d’Art Moderne. The role • Their most immediate task was to saved from demolition, he proposed that this institution might play in the define a legal status, which would to turn it into an international centre project was the subject of numerous ensure both the Foundation’s coming housing the Fondation Le Corbusier. discussions with its two curators, into being and its permanence, and who had been closely following provide it with the necessary resources Le Corbusier’s work, Bernard Dorival for accomplishing its missions. The et Maurice Besset. main subject of his preliminary study was the tax question, but it also On 3 July 1959, after an exchange of confirmed the advantage to be gained letters lasting several months, Le from conceiving of the Foundation as Corbusier sent a handwritten letter to a testamentary body after the death La Roche to thank him for formally of its founder. To begin with, however, confirming the donation of his house this solution meant provisionally in Square du Docteur Blanche to the forming an association with the job of Fondation Le Corbusier. ensuring a transition/transfer in legal and material conditions that were On this occasion you and I are sound. accomplishing a material and moral act expressing our mutual respect • It was equally important to find and our faith in art. Your life and mine premises to house the different acti- alike have been inspired by it. vities of the Foundation. The project After my time, the Fondation Le required office accommodation for a Corbusier will prolong the research secretariat, exhibition and meeting Portrait of Raoul La Roche, I have devoted myself to; giving this spaces as well as a building for photo private collection foundation a roof will consecrate the stocking archives and a large collec- friendship that brought us together tion of works of art.
Recommended publications
  • Charles-Édouard Jeanneret
    L E COR- BUS- CHARLES-ÉDOUARDIER JEANNERET Charles-Édouard Jeanneret, known as Le Corbusier (October 6, 1887 – August 27, 1965), was a Swiss-French architect, designer, painter, urban planner, writer, and one of the pio- neers of what is now called modern architecture. He was born in Switzerland and became a French citizen in 1930. His career spanned five decades; he constructed buildings in Eu- rope, Japan, India, and North and South America. Dedicated to providing better living conditions for the residents of crowded cities, Le Corbusier was influential in urban planning, and was a founding member of the Congrès International d’Architecture Moderne (CIAM). Le Corbusier prepared the master plan for the city of Chandigarh in India, and contributed specific designs for several buildings there. On July 17, 2016, seventeen projects by Le Corbusier in seven countries were inscribed in the list of UNESCO World Heritage sites as “an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement”. Charles-Édouard Jeanneret was born on October 6, 1887 in La Chaux-de-Fonds, a small city in the French-speaking Neuchâtel canton in north-western Switzerland, in the Jura mountains, just 5 kilometres (3.1 mi) across the border from France. It was an industrial town, devoted to the manufacture of watches. (He adopted the pseudonym Le Corbusier in 1933 of Le Corbusier in 1920). His father was an artisan who Charles-Édouard Jeanneret-Gris[1] October 6, 1887 enameled boxes and watches, while his mother gave piano La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland lessons. His elder brother Albert was an amateur violinist. Died :August 27, 1965 (aged 77) Roquebrune :Cap-Martin, France [3] He attended a kindergarten that used Fröbelian Nationality :Swiss, French methods.
    [Show full text]
  • A Symbol of Global Protec- 7 1 5 4 5 10 10 17 5 4 8 4 7 1 1213 6 JAPAN 3 14 1 6 16 CHINA 33 2 6 18 AF Tion for the Heritage of All Humankind
    4 T rom the vast plains of the Serengeti to historic cities such T 7 ICELAND as Vienna, Lima and Kyoto; from the prehistoric rock art 1 5 on the Iberian Peninsula to the Statue of Liberty; from the 2 8 Kasbah of Algiers to the Imperial Palace in Beijing — all 5 2 of these places, as varied as they are, have one thing in common. FINLAND O 3 All are World Heritage sites of outstanding cultural or natural 3 T 15 6 SWEDEN 13 4 value to humanity and are worthy of protection for future 1 5 1 1 14 T 24 NORWAY 11 2 20 generations to know and enjoy. 2 RUSSIAN 23 NIO M O UN IM D 1 R I 3 4 T A FEDERATION A L T • P 7 • W L 1 O 17 A 2 I 5 ESTONIA 6 R D L D N 7 O 7 H E M R 4 I E 3 T IN AG O 18 E • IM 8 PATR Key LATVIA 6 United Nations World 1 Cultural property The designations employed and the presentation 1 T Educational, Scientific and Heritage of material on this map do not imply the expres- 12 Cultural Organization Convention 1 Natural property 28 T sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of 14 10 1 1 22 DENMARK 9 LITHUANIA Mixed property (cultural and natural) 7 3 N UNESCO and National Geographic Society con- G 1 A UNITED 2 2 Transnational property cerning the legal status of any country, territory, 2 6 5 1 30 X BELARUS 1 city or area or of its authorities, or concerning 1 Property currently inscribed on the KINGDOM 4 1 the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention
    WHC. 12/01 July 2012 Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANISATION INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE The Operational Guidelines are periodically revised to reflect the decisions of the World Heritage Committee. Please verify that you are using the latest version of the Operational Guidelines by checking the date of the Operational Guidelines on the UNESCO World Heritage Centre Web address indicated below. The Operational Guidelines (in English and French), the text of the World Heritage Convention (in five languages), and other documents and information concerning World Heritage are available from the World Heritage Centre: UNESCO World Heritage Centre 7, place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel : +33 (0)1 4568 1876 Fax : +33 (0)1 4568 5570 E-mail : [email protected] Links : http://whc.unesco.org/ http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines (English) http://whc.unesco.org/fr/orientations (French) ii Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Paragraph number number(s) ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS I. INTRODUCTION I.A The Operational Guidelines 1-3 I.B The World Heritage Convention 4-9 I.C The States Parties to the World Heritage Convention 10-16 I.D The General Assembly of States Parties to the World 17-18 Heritage Convention I.E The World Heritage Committee 19-26 I.F The Secretariat to the World Heritage Committee (the 27-29 World Heritage Centre) I.G The Advisory Bodies to the World Heritage Committee: 30-37 ⋅ ICCROM 32-33 ⋅ ICOMOS 34-35 ⋅ IUCN 36-37 I.H Other organizations 38 I.I Partners in the protection of World Heritage 39-40 I.J Other Conventions, Recommendations and Programmes 41-44 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Impressionist & Modern
    IMPRESSIONIST & MODERN ART Thursday 1 March 2018 IMPRESSIONIST & MODERN ART Thursday 1 March 2018 at 5pm New Bond Street, London VIEWING ENQUIRIES Brussels Rome Thursday 22 February, 9am to 5pm London Christine de Schaetzen Emma Dalla Libera Friday 23 February, 9am to 5pm India Phillips +32 2736 5076 +39 06 485 900 Saturday 24 February, 11am to 4pm Head of Department [email protected] [email protected] Sunday 25 February, 11am to 4pm +44 (0) 20 7468 8328 Monday 26 February, 9am to 5pm [email protected] Cologne Tokyo Tuesday 27 February, 9am to 3pm Katharina Schmid Ryo Wakabayashi Wednesday 28 February 9am to 5pm Hannah Foster +49 221 2779 9650 +81 3 5532 8636 Thursday 1 March, 9am to 2pm Department Director [email protected] [email protected] +44 (0) 20 7468 5814 SALE NUMBER [email protected] Geneva Zurich 24743 Victoria Rey-de-Rudder Andrea Bodmer Ruth Woodbridge +41 22 300 3160 +41 (0) 44 281 95 35 CATALOGUE Specialist [email protected] [email protected] £22.00 +44 (0) 20 7468 5816 [email protected] Livie Gallone Moeller PHYSICAL CONDITION OF LOTS ILLUSTRATIONS +41 22 300 3160 IN THIS AUCTION Front cover: Lot 16 Aimée Honig [email protected] Inside front covers: Lots 20, Junior Cataloguer PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NO 21, 15, 70, 68, 9 +44 (0) 20 7468 8276 Hong Kong REFERENCE IN THIS CATALOGUE Back cover: Lot 33 [email protected] Dorothy Lin TO THE PHYSICAL CONDITION OF +1 323 436 5430 ANY LOT.
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO World Heritage and Kosovo Towards a Tentative List for Kosovo Caroline Jaeger Klein Vienna University of Technology, [email protected]
    University of Business and Technology in Kosovo UBT Knowledge Center UBT International Conference 2016 UBT International Conference Oct 28th, 9:00 AM - Oct 30th, 5:00 PM UNESCO World Heritage and Kosovo Towards a Tentative List for Kosovo Caroline Jaeger Klein Vienna University of Technology, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://knowledgecenter.ubt-uni.net/conference Part of the Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Klein, Caroline Jaeger, "UNESCO World Heritage and Kosovo Towards a Tentative List for Kosovo" (2016). UBT International Conference. 65. https://knowledgecenter.ubt-uni.net/conference/2016/all-events/65 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Publication and Journals at UBT Knowledge Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in UBT International Conference by an authorized administrator of UBT Knowledge Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book of Proceedings International Conference on Architecture and Spatial Planning UNESCO World Heritage and Kosovo Towards a Tentative List for Kosovo. Caroline Jaeger-Klein Vienna University of Technology, Department for History of Architecture and Building Archaeology, Karlsplatz 13/251; A-1040 Vienna, Austria [email protected] Abstract. In 2015, Kosovo tried to join UNESCO and failed by three quotes. Is Kosovo ready for its UNESCO membership? At least for its national architectural heritage, this question is to answer with no. The intensively discussed issue of the medieval monuments of Kosovo inscribed as UNESCO World Heritage by Serbia and Montenegro before the declaration of independency in 2008 and their further management through Kosovo is just one aspect.
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage 35 COM
    World Heritage 35 COM Distribution Limited WHC-11/35.COM/6 Paris, 6 May 2011 Original: English/French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-fifth session Paris, UNESCO Headquarters 19 – 29 June 2011 Item 6 of the Provisional Agenda: Progress report on the World Heritage related category 2 centres SUMMARY The present document provides information on the first annual meeting of the World Heritage related category 2 centres, which was held in Bahrain on 19-20 December 2010 and includes a consolidated report of activities by the Nordic World Heritage Foundation (NWHF), the World Heritage Institute of Training and Research-Asia and Pacific (WHITR-AP); the Arab Regional Centre for World Heritage (ARC-WH); the Regional Heritage Management Training Centre in Brazil; the African World Heritage Fund (AWHF), and the Regional World Heritage Institute in Zacatecas, Mexico. Draft decision: 35 COM 6, see Point III. I. Background 1. In the recent years, the framework for training and research in the field of World Heritage has changed significantly since the Global Training Strategy was first adopted by the World Heritage Committee (2001), and became much richer around the world with more and diverse training opportunities being offered. In particular, States Parties have established capacity building institutions that have been granted the status of “category 2 centres under the auspices of UNESCO” dealing specifically with World Heritage. All these changes to the landscape of training and research have led to the need to take advantage of these new positive developments and, in the meantime, to ensure a clearer definition of the roles and responsibilities of each of the main actors involved in the implementation of the World Heritage strategy for capacity-building (see Document WHC-11/35.COM/9B).
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Local Communities and Well-Being in UNESCO World Heritage Site Conservation: an Analysis of the Operational Guidelines, 1994–2019
    sustainability Article The Role of Local Communities and Well-Being in UNESCO World Heritage Site Conservation: An Analysis of the Operational Guidelines, 1994–2019 Hanbyeol Jang * and Jeremy Mennis Department of Geography and Urban Studies, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: UNESCO’s world heritage program aims to protect sites of cultural and natural heritage worldwide. Issues of local communities and well-being have been given increasing attention by heritage conservation scholars, but a systemic review of UNESCO guidelines has not been performed. Here, we examine the evolution of the ‘Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention,’ documents representing the heritage conservation policies of UNESCO over the period 1994–2019. Using keyword analysis and document analysis, the findings show evidence of an increasing emphasis on local communities, growing primarily since 2005. However, the theme of well-being only first emerged in the operational guidelines in 2019. Political, economic, and environmental challenges idiosyncratic to specific places often complicate the role of local communities and well-being in heritage conservation priorities. Future research should investigate the potential implementation and implications of these changes for the guidelines at specific UNESCO Citation: Jang, H.; Mennis, J. The world heritage sites. Role of Local Communities and Well-Being in UNESCO World Keywords: UNESCO; operational guidelines;
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage of Religion, Beliefs and Spirituality Patrimoine De La Religion, Des Croyances Et De La Spiritualité
    Heritage of religion, beliefs and spirituality Patrimoine de la religion, des croyances et de la spiritualité A bibliography Une bibliographie By ICOMOS Documenta on Centre - October 2014 Par le Centre de Documenta on ICOMOS - Octobre 2014 Updated and edited by Valéria De Almeida Gomes, intern at ICOMOS Documentation Centre, and Lucile Smirnov. This bibliography refers to documents and materials available at ICOMOS Documentation Centre. It does not intend to be a comprehensive list of scientific literature on religions cultural heritage. Any reference can be consulted or scanned, subject to the limits of copyright legislation. Actualisé et mis en page par Valéria De Almeida Gomes et Lucile Smirnov. Cette bibliographie fait référence à des documents et ouvrages disponibles au Centre de documentation de l’ICOMOS. Elle ne prétend pas constituer une bibliographie exhaustive de la littérature scientifique sur e patrimoine culturel des religions. Toutes ces références peuvent être consultées ou scannées dans la limite de la loi sur le copyright. Contact ICOMOS Documentation Centre / Centre de Documentation ICOMOS http://www.icomos.org/en/documentation-center [email protected] © ICOMOS Documentation Centre, October 2014. ICOMOS - International Council on Monuments and sites Conseil International des Monuments et des Sites 11 rue du Séminaire de Conflans 94 220 Charenton-le-Pont France Tel. + 33 (0) 1 41 94 17 59 http://www.icomos.org Cover photographs: Photos de couverture : Hagia Sophia, Istanbul © David Spencer / Flickr; Borobudur near Yogyakarta. ©: Paul Arps/Flickr; Old Jewish Cemetery (Starý židovský hrbitov), Prague (Prag/Praha) © Ulf Liljankoski / Flickr Index Polytheism and early cults ......................................................... 2 African syncretism and traditional religions .................................
    [Show full text]
  • English Version
    UNESCO World Heritage Convention World Heritage Committee 2011 Addendum Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties ICOMOS report for the World Heritage Committee, 35th ordinary session UNESCO, June 2011 Secrétariat ICOMOS International 49-51 rue de la Fédération 75015 Paris France Tel : 33 (0)1 45 67 67 70 Fax : 33 (0)1 45 66 06 22 World Heritage List Nominations received by 1st February 2011 V Mixed properties A Asia - Pacific Minor modifications to the boundaries Australia [N/C 147ter] Kakadu National Park 1 VI Cultural properties A Africa Properties referred back by previous sessions of the World Heritage Committee Ethiopia [C 1333rev] The Konso Cultural Landscape 2 Kenya [C 1295rev] Fort Jesus, Mombasa 16 Minor modifications to the boundaries Mauritius [C 1259] Le Morne Cultural Landscape 29 B Arab States Creation of buffer zone Syrian Arab Republic [C 20] Ancient City of Damascus 30 C Asia - Pacific Minor modifications to the boundaries Malaysia [C 1223] Melaka and George Town, Historic Cities of the Straits of Malacca 32 D Europe Properties referred back by previous sessions of the World Heritage Committee France [C 1153rev] The Causses and the Cévennes, Mediterranean agro-pastoral Cultural Landscape 34 France, Argentina, Belgium, Germany, Japan, Switzerland [C 1321rev] The architectural work of Le Corbusier, an outstanding contribution to the Modern Movement 47 Israel [C 1105rev] The Triple-arch Gate at Dan 72 Minor modifications to the boundaries Cyprus [C 848] Choirokoitia 83 Italy [C 726] Historic Centre of Naples 85 Spain [C 522rev] Renaissance Monumental Ensembles of Úbeda and Baeza 87 Creation of buffer zone Germany [C 271] Pilgrimage Church of Wies 89 Germany [C 515rev] Abbey and Altenmünster of Lorsch 90 E Latin America and the Caribbean Minor modifications to the boundaries Chile [C 1178] Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works 92 Creation of buffer zone Honduras [C 129] Maya Site of Copan 94 surrounded by the property, which currently extends to 1.98 million hectares.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin | Bulletin | POLISH NATIONAL COMMISSION for UNESCO Reviev
    biuletyn 2014 PRZEGLÑD POLSKIEGO KOMITETU DO SPRAW UNESCO PRZEGLÑD POLSKIEGO KOMITETU DO SPRAW UNESCO biuletyn| | biuletyn bulletin | bulletin | POLISH NATIONAL COMMISSION for UNESCO Reviev for UNESCO Review UNESCO for POLISH NATIONAL COMMISSION COMMISSION NATIONAL POLISH 2014 bulletin covBIUL14kalOK.indd 1 05.10.2015 19:08 POLISH NATIONAL COMMISSION for UNESCO Review bulletin| 2014 Polish National Commission for UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization strtytBIU13.indd 7 05.10.2015 22:34 Table of Contents Henryka Mościcka-Dendys 5 UNESCO and Poland today Andrzej Rottermund 7 UNESCO – A Mission Still Valid 14–83 UNESCO and Poland – 70 Years of Cooperation Sławomir Ratajski 85 What We Did in 2014 91–99 Events 2014 100 Polish National Commission’s Honorary Patronage 2014 102 Members of the Polish National Commission for UNESCO 70TH ANNIVERSARY OF UNESCO 5 UNESCO and Poland Today Dr Henryka Mościcka-Dendys Undersecretary of State Ministry of Foreign Affairs “...since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defences of peace must be constructed” This message, taken from the Preamble to UNESCO’s Constitution, remains compelling, all the more so as new threats to peace and security unfold. These include the activities of extremist groups, often aimed directly at world heritage, culture and people active in culture. For this reason, UNESCO’s activities are of more significance than ever before. The international community should unremittingly continue to promote the values that underpinned the Organization’s foundation, and continue to motivate its actions. UNESCO was founded 70 years ago, after the tragic experiences of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Communique De Presse
    COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE 20/07/16 World Heritage listing by UNESCO of « the architectural work of Le Corbusier, an outstanding contribution to the Modern Movement”: Gael Perdriau and Marc Petit welcome a major international award for the region. The Site Le Corbusier, located in Firminy, France – Europe’s largest collection of the works by the visionary architect - has finally been awarded World Heritage status. It is such a wonderful international recognition! Said Gael Perdriau, Maire of Saint-Etienne, President of Saint Etienne Métropole and Marc Petit, Maire of Firminy, Vice-President of Saint Etienne Métropole. As a result, the Culture Center of Firminy will become part of an international network of World Heritage Sites, joining the nearby city of Saint Etienne which is already listed as a ‘Creative City of Design’ by UNESCO. One of the features of this application is its unique international aspect. We would like to thank all the local residents, organizations and sponsors who have supported this campaign. The ‘Site Le Corbusier’ at Firminy - the second largest site after Chandigarh in India - is a major collection of architectural works. It is also a cultural, economic and touristic landmark, an invaluable asset for our region. The project strategy put in place by the City of Firminy and St Etienne Metropolitan Council will be enhanced by this award. It will lead to an increase in short and medium stay visits, an increase in hotel and restaurant bookings and furthermore, a boost to tourism in the wider region. » Open every day from 10 am to 12:30am and from 11:30 pm to 6 pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Word Heritage Papers 5 ; Identification and Documentation of Modern
    World Heritage papers5 Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage Disclaimer The authors are responsible for the choice and presentation of the facts contained in this publication and for the opinions therein, which are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. The designation employed and the presentation of the material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published in 2003 by the UNESCO World Heritage Centre with financial contribution from the Netherlands Funds-in-Trust 7, place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel : 33 (0)1 45 68 18 76 Fax : 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 E-mail : [email protected] http://whc.unesco.org Compiled and edited by R. van Oers and S. Haraguchi Foreword Under the Global Strategy for a credible, balanced and representative World Heritage List, adopted by the World Heritage Committee in 1994, the World Heritage Centre is engaged in assisting States Parties that have few or no World Heritage sites to protect, preserve and nominate their heritage of outstanding universal value. Next to this, a pro-active approach is also taken with regard to the identification and documentation of less-represented categories of heritage for inclusion on the World Heritage List. One such category is Modern Heritage, which comprises the architecture, town planning and landscape design of the 19th and 20th centuries.
    [Show full text]