Influence of Light Availability on Tree Growth, Defense

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Influence of Light Availability on Tree Growth, Defense Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2020 Influence of light va ailability on tree growth, defense, and emerald ash borer (Agrlius planipennis) success in white fringetree (Chionanthus virginicus) and black ash (Fraxinus nigra) Michael S. Friedman Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Biology Commons Repository Citation Friedman, Michael S., "Influence of light va ailability on tree growth, defense, and emerald ash borer (Agrlius planipennis) success in white fringetree (Chionanthus virginicus) and black ash (Fraxinus nigra)" (2020). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 2310. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/2310 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFLUENCE OF LIGHT AVAILABILITY ON TREE GROWTH, DEFENSE, AND EMERALD ASH BORER (AGRILUS PLANIPENNIS) SUCCESS IN WHITE FRINGETREE (CHIONANTHUS VIRGINICUS) AND BLACK ASH (FRAXINUS NIGRA) A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science by MICHAEL S. FRIEDMAN B.S., Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, 2017 2020 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL March 25, 2020 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Michael S. Friedman ENTITLED “Influence of light availability on tree growth, defense mechanisms, and emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) success in White fringetree (Chionanthus virginicus) and black ash (Fraxinus nigra)” BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE. _______________________ Don Cipollini, Ph.D. Thesis Director __________________________ David Goldstein, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Biological Sciences Committee on Final Examination: ________________________________ Don Cipollini, Ph.D. ________________________________ Megan Rúa, Ph.D. ________________________________ John O. Stireman III, Ph.D. ________________________________ Barry Milligan, Ph.D. Interim Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Friedman, Michael S. M.S. Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 2020. Influence of light availability on tree growth, defense mechanisms, and emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) success in white fringetree (Chionanthus virginicus) and black ash (Fraxinus nigra). White fringetree is a host for the invasive emerald ash borer (EAB) despite being lower quality than black ash. Observations suggest that host trees grown in full sun are more resistant to EAB than those grown in shade, hoWever chemical defense mechanisms and the impact of environmental stress have not been assessed. We quantified constitutive and induced defenses and other characteristics White fringetree and black ash phloem tissue groWn under differential light conditions, and these traits Were related to EAB larval performance. White fringetree had significantly lower constitutive and induced activities of defense associated enzymes and lignin but higher phenolic, non-structural carbohydrate, and oleuropein concentrations compared to black ash. Light limitation did not impact measured defense traits or EAB larval performance, although it did impact groWth and photosynthetic efficiency. Our results suggest that phenolic profiles, metabolite abundance, and groWth traits are important in mediating White fringetree susceptibility to EAB infestation. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................vi LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..............................................................................................viii INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................1 Emerald ash borer-host tree system.........................................................................6 Ash species and EAB...............................................................................................9 White fringetree and EAB.....................................................................................12 SPECIFIC AIMS AND HYPOTHESES...........................................................................15 METHODS AND MATERIALS.......................................................................................17 Experimental design and location..........................................................................17 Growth and photosynthetic efficiency...................................................................18 Methyl jasmonate treatment...................................................................................19 EAB larval performance........................................................................................20 Protein extraction and activity assays....................................................................20 Total phenolic and lignin content..........................................................................22 Non-structural carbohydrate content......................................................................24 Oleuropein concentration.......................................................................................24 Statistical analyses.................................................................................................26 iv RESULTS..........................................................................................................................27 Growth and photosynthetic efficiency...................................................................27 Enzyme activity assays..........................................................................................28 Total phenolic and lignin content..........................................................................29 Non-structural carbohydrate content......................................................................30 Oleuropein concentration.......................................................................................30 Principal component analyses................................................................................30 EAB larval performance........................................................................................31 DISCUSSION....................................................................................................................32 LITERATURE CITED......................................................................................................59 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Terminal bud growth throughout the study, presented by species and light treatment....43 2. Total growth rate, presented by species and light treatment............................................44 3. Initial terminal bud growth by species............................................................................45 4. Photosynthetic efficiency by light treatment...................................................................46 5. Protein concentration by species and MeJA treatment....................................................47 6. Peroxidase, β-glucosidase, and chitinase activities.........................................................48 7. Polyphenol oxidase and trypsin inhibitor activities.......................................................50 8. Lignin, total phenolic, and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations........................51 9. Oleuropein concentration by species and MeJA treatment............................................53 10. PCA 1: Control v. MeJA treated black ash..................................................................54 11. PCA 2: control v. MeJA treated white fringetree........................................................55 12. PCA 3: control black ash v. control white fringetree...................................................56 13. PCA 4: MeJA treated black ash v. MeJA treated white fringetree..............................57 14: Emerald ash borer larval gallery width by species......................................................58 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Impact of species, methyl jasmonate, and light treatment on defense-associated enzyme activities, three-factor ANOVA results..............................................................................42 vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor and mentor, Dr. Don Cipollini, for taking me on as a student, for all of the laboratory training necessary to complete this study, and for the professional opportunities I have had over the past tWo years. I also need to include members of the Cipollini and Stireman labs including Emily Ellison, Dr. Donnie Peterson, Alicia Goffe, and Juan Manuel Perilla Lopez for assistance with lab and field Work when needed. Thank you to my committee members Dr. Megan Rúa and Dr. John Stireman III for alWays being available to ansWer my questions. And a huge thanks to all the undergraduate and graduate students, staff, and faculty members of the Biological Sciences Department that have made my time at Wright State University incredible. Lastly, to my family and friends: thank you for all of the love and support you have
Recommended publications
  • Whole-Genome Data Reveal the Complex History of a Diverse Ecological Community
    Whole-genome data reveal the complex history of a diverse ecological community Lynsey Bunnefelda,b,1,2, Jack Hearna,1, Graham N. Stonea,3, and Konrad Lohsea,3 aInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, Scotland; and bBiological & Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland Edited by Craig Moritz, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Douglas Futuyma May 30, 2018 (received for review January 8, 2018) How widespread ecological communities assemble remains a key Concordant population histories are expected in obligate question in ecology. Trophic interactions between widespread species associations, such as those between plants and special- species may reflect a shared population history or ecological ist pollinators, and these commonly show both coevolution of fitting of local pools of species with very different population his- associated traits and codiversification of the lineages involved tories. Which scenario applies is central to the stability of trophic (6, 7). However, much of terrestrial diversity is found in com- associations and the potential for coevolution between species. munities dominated by less specific interactions between guilds Here we show how alternative community assembly hypotheses of species, for which either codispersal or ecological fitting is can be discriminated using whole-genome data for component a plausible assembly mechanism. These are exemplified by the species and provide a likelihood framework that overcomes cur- rich insect communities associated with temperate trees, in which rent limitations in formal comparison of multispecies histories. widespread herbivores are commonly attacked by a consistent set We illustrate our approach by inferring the assembly history of of parasitoid enemies (8, 9).
    [Show full text]
  • Olive Family)
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- OLEACEAE OLEACEAE (Olive Family) A family of about 24 genera and 615 species, trees and shrubs, nearly cosmopolitan, but centered in Asia. References: Hardin (1974)=Z. 1 Leaves pinnately compound; fruit a samara; plant a small to large tree . Fraxinus 1 Leaves simple; fruit a drupe or capsule; plant a shrub to small tree. 2 Flowers bright yellow, showy; fruit a many-seeded capsule . Forsythia 2 Flowers white, lilac, or purplish; fruit a drupe or 4-seeded capsule. 3 Leaves cordate or truncate at the base; fruit a 4-seeded capsule; corolla lobes shorter than the tube; flowers lilac or white, in terminal panicles ...............................................................Syringa 3 Leaves cuneate to rounded at the base; fruit a drupe; corolla lobes either shorter or longer than the tube; flowers white or greenish-white, in terminal or lateral panicles or fascicles. 4 Corolla absent; calyx minute or lacking; flowers in axillary fascicles . Forestiera 4 Corolla present (often conspicuous and showy); calyx present; flowers lateral or terminal panicles. 5 Corolla lobes elongate, much longer than the corolla tube . Chionanthus 5 Corolla lobes short, no longer than the corolla tube. 6 Inflorescence a many-flowered terminal panicle; leaves generally ovate, elliptic or lanceolate (widest below or at the middle)....................................................Ligustrum 6 Inflorescence a few-flowered axillary panicle; leaves generally oblanceolate or obovate (widest above the middle)........................................................... Osmanthus Chionanthus Linnaeus (Fringe-tree, Old Man's Beard) A genus of controversial circumscription, either of only 3 species, limited to se. North America and e. Asia, or (if including Linociera) of about 100 species, primarily tropical.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerald Ash Borer Fact Sheet
    Symptoms of EAB Infestation WhatWhat to doDo if if you You suspectSuspect a Etreemerald has emeraldAsh ashBorer: borer: If your ash tree exhibits Emerald Ash Borer dieback,If your ashrefer tree to all exhibits possible BE AWISE ASH bioticdieback, and referabiotic to issues all in thispossible guide. biotic For further and abiotichelp, issues in this guide. contact a certified arborist in your area. If you suspect EAB For further help, contact a Emerald Ash Borer, Agrilus planipennis Damage from woodpeckers Thinning in upper D-shaped exit holes in trunk24 on your property or have a feeding on EAB larvae22 canopy23 certified arborist in your area.suspected If you suspectEAB insect EAB on The emerald ash borer (EAB) is a destructive wood- sample,your property contact oryour have local a boring insect that has killed millions of ash trees in suspectedextension EAB agent, insect the North America. It was first discovered in Detroit, Schuttersample, Diagnosticcontact your Lab local at Michigan in 2002, and it likely came from wood Montana State University extension agent, the packaging material imported from Asia. It has become Schutter(406-994-5704), Diagnostic or the Lab at widely established in 35 states and five Canadian MontanaMontana DepartmentState University of provinces. As of March 2020, it has not been detected Agriculture(406-994-5704), (406-444-3790). or the Montana Department of in Montana. Unfortunately, it is easily transported on Bark splitting from EAB Serpentine galleries under Epicormic branches and Agriculture firewood so Montana is always just one visitor’s 27 infestation25 the bark26 shoots at base of tree (406-444-3790).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Fitting As a Determinant of the Community Structure of Platyhelminth Parasites of Anurans
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 7-2006 Ecological Fitting as a Determinant of the Community Structure of Platyhelminth Parasites of Anurans Daniel R. Brooks University of Toronto, [email protected] Virginia León-Règagnon Nacional Autónoma de México Deborah A. McLennan University of Toronto Derek Zelmer Emporia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Parasitology Commons Brooks, Daniel R.; León-Règagnon, Virginia; McLennan, Deborah A.; and Zelmer, Derek, "Ecological Fitting as a Determinant of the Community Structure of Platyhelminth Parasites of Anurans" (2006). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 269. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/269 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Ecology, 87(7) Supplement, 2006, pp. S76-S85 ? 2006 by the Ecological Society of America ECOLOGICAL FITTING AS A DETERMINANT OF THE COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF PLATYHELMINTH PARASITES OF ANURANS and Daniel R. Brooks,1'5 Virginia Le?n-Regagnon,2 Deborah A. McLennan,3 Derek Zelmer4 1Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G5 Canada 2Laboratorio de Helmintolog?a, Instituto de Biolog?a, Universidad Nacional Aut?noma de M?xico, C. P. 04510, D. F. M?xico, M?xico of Zoology, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G5 Canada * 3'Department Department of Biological Sciences, Emporia State University, Emporia, Kansas 66801 USA are Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Simple Sequence Repeat Markers for <I>Chionanthus Retusus</I> (Oleaceae) and Effective Discrimination
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2011 Development of Simple Sequence Repeat Markers for Chionanthus Retusus (Oleaceae) and Effective Discrimination of Closely Related Taxa R. S. Arias U.S.D.A. National Peanut Res. Lab., [email protected] Timothy A. Rinehart University of Mississippi Richard T. Olsen U.S. National Arboretum, USDA-ARS Joseph H. Kirkbride Jr. U.S. National Arboretum, USDA-ARS Brian E. Scheffler USDA-ARS, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons Arias, R. S.; Rinehart, Timothy A.; Olsen, Richard T.; Kirkbride, Joseph H. Jr.; and Scheffler, Brian E., "Development of Simple Sequence Repeat Markers for Chionanthus Retusus (Oleaceae) and Effective Discrimination of Closely Related Taxa" (2011). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 894. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/894 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. HORTSCIENCE 46(1):23–29. 2011. the three temperate species are economically important as ornamentals and natural prod- ucts. Temperate Chionanthus spp. (C. retusus Development of Simple Sequence from eastern Asia and C. pygmaeus and C. virginicus from eastern North America) are Repeat Markers for Chionanthus cultivated for their white flowers in feathery panicles and decorative blue fruits.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Host-Switching by Ecological Fitting Sabrina B
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Biology Publications Dept. of Biology 2015 Understanding Host-Switching by Ecological Fitting Sabrina B. L. Araujo Universidade Federal do Paraná Mariana Pires Braga Universidade Federal do Paraná Daniel R. Brooks Universidade Federal do Paraná See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/biol_pubs Part of the Biology Commons This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The orkw is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication Downloaded from http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/biol_pubs/26 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Dept. of Biology at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Publications by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Sabrina B. L. Araujo, Mariana Pires Braga, Daniel R. Brooks, Salvatore J. Agosta, Eric P. Hoberg, Francisco W. von Hartenthal, and Walter A. Boeger This article is available at VCU Scholars Compass: http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/biol_pubs/26 RESEARCH ARTICLE Understanding Host-Switching by Ecological Fitting Sabrina B. L. Araujo1,2, Mariana Pires Braga1, Daniel R. Brooks1, Salvatore J. Agosta3, Eric P. Hoberg4, Francisco W. von Hartenthal5, Walter A. Boeger1* 1 Laboratório de Ecologia Molecular e Parasitologia Evolutiva, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19073, Curitiba, PR 81531–980, Brazil, 2 Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19044, Curitiba, PR 81531–980, Brazil, 3 Center for Environmental Studies and Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America, 4 US National Parasite Collection, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, BARC East No.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardening News the Newsletter of the Men’S Garden Club of Englewood October 2011 Issue No
    The Gardening News The Newsletter of the Men’s Garden Club of Englewood October 2011 Issue No. 12.01 Editor’s Notes Caring For Your Palm Trees The Coming Year With this issue of the newsletter we start If we had fewer palm trees in Florida our landscape would be more similar to the several new projects which I hope you will Carolinas. We have many palms, yet there seems to be confusion as to how to care for find interesting and useful. Last year we them. This article is in two parts. It will try to give some direction regarding the use of focused on flowering plants. This year our fertilizer for your palms while the second part will be about how and when to prune focus will be on plants that have interest- those palms. ing and colorful leaf structure as well as A simple fertilizer plan would be to apply a slow release fertilizer with microelements more on taking care of what is in your three or four times a year, following the directions on the bag. The following list of garden. The article to the right onCaring “DOs” and “DON’Ts” should help you make some decisions. For Your Palm Trees, is a good example. DOs A second focus in the newsletter will • Read the directions on the bag. be a Gardening Glossary. The last one • Fertilize only when the soil is moist, especially when using a quick release material. was printed about eight to ten years ago • Water quite thoroughly after fertilizing. and some of our long time members will • Try to under-fertilize rather than over-fertilize your palm trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Floral Nectar in Heliconia Stilesii Daniels by Three Species of Hermit Hummingbirds
    The Condor89~779-787 0 The Cooper OrnithologicalSociety 1987 ECOLOGICAL FITTING: USE OF FLORAL NECTAR IN HELICONIA STILESII DANIELS BY THREE SPECIES OF HERMIT HUMMINGBIRDS FRANK B. GILL The Academyof Natural Sciences,Philadelphia, PA 19103 Abstract. Three speciesof hermit hummingbirds-a specialist(Eutoxeres aquikz), a gen- eralist (Phaethornissuperciliosus), and a thief (Threnetesruckerz]-visited the nectar-rich flowers of Heliconia stilesii Daniels at a lowland study site on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica. Unlike H. pogonanthaCufodontis, a related Caribbean lowland specieswith a less specialized flower, H. stilesii may not realize its full reproductive potential at this site, becauseit cannot retain the services of alternative pollinators such as Phaethornis.The flowers of H. stilesii appear adapted for pollination by Eutoxeres, but this hummingbird rarely visited them at this site. Lek male Phaethornisvisited the flowers frequently in late May and early June, but then abandonedthis nectar sourcein favor of other flowers offering more accessiblenectar. The strong curvature of the perianth prevents accessby Phaethornis to the main nectar chamber; instead they obtain only small amounts of nectar that leaks anteriorly into the belly of the flower. Key words: Hummingbird; pollination; mutualism;foraging; Heliconia stilesii; nectar. INTRODUCTION Ultimately affectedare the hummingbird’s choice Species that expand their distribution following of flowers and patterns of competition among speciationenter novel ecologicalassociations un- hummingbird species for nectar (Stiles 1975, related to previous evolutionary history and face 1978; Wolf et al. 1976; Feinsinger 1978; Gill the challenges of adjustment to new settings, 1978). Use of specificHeliconia flowers as sources called “ecological fitting” (Janzen 1985a). In the of nectar by particular species of hermit hum- case of mutualistic species, such as plants and mingbirds, however, varies seasonally and geo- their pollinators, new ecological settingsmay in- graphically (Stiles 1975).
    [Show full text]
  • Open As a Single Document
    . ARNOLDIA E I A publication of THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts 02130 VOLUME 28 APRIL 12, 1968 NUMBER 1 COUNTRY COUSINS the horticultural world, a continuous effort ~s bemg made to select the I"best" N trees and shrubs for ornamental use. In the process, many other plants are relegated to secondary status and then are often ignored by the hor- ticultural public. Later on, a few may show traits that were not obvious at first - and so bid for reconsideration. In other cases, one species has become en- trenched in horticultural usage-and for this reason alone continues to over- shadow later introductions. An occasional looking back through the lists of little-used plants can be expected to turn up a few that have been overshadowed by better-known relatives, but that have character of their own-and potential usefulness. Chionanthus retusus Chinese Fringetree Our native (southeastern U. S. ) fringetree (Chionanthus virginicus) is fairly well known, even though not widely used as a landscape plant in our area. Its oriental relative, Chionanthus retnsus, is even less used, probably because its flowers and inflorescences are smaller. But the overall effect of C. retusus in bloom is almost as spectacular as that of C. virginicus (Plate I). In addition, it can be grown with minimal pruning, while C. virginicus requires heavy pruning every few years to maintain good form. The largest specimen of C. retusus m the Arnold Arboretum is about 20 feet tall and resembles a miniature American elm in outline. This and its interesting furrowed bark keep this tree interesting during the winter months (Plates I and II).
    [Show full text]
  • Landscaping Near Black Walnut Trees
    Selecting juglone-tolerant plants Landscaping Near Black Walnut Trees Black walnut trees (Juglans nigra) can be very attractive in the home landscape when grown as shade trees, reaching a potential height of 100 feet. The walnuts they produce are a food source for squirrels, other wildlife and people as well. However, whether a black walnut tree already exists on your property or you are considering planting one, be aware that black walnuts produce juglone. This is a natural but toxic chemical they produce to reduce competition for resources from other plants. This natural self-defense mechanism can be harmful to nearby plants causing “walnut wilt.” Having a walnut tree in your landscape, however, certainly does not mean the landscape will be barren. Not all plants are sensitive to juglone. Many trees, vines, shrubs, ground covers, annuals and perennials will grow and even thrive in close proximity to a walnut tree. Production and Effect of Juglone Toxicity Juglone, which occurs in all parts of the black walnut tree, can affect other plants by several means: Stems Through root contact Leaves Through leakage or decay in the soil Through falling and decaying leaves When rain leaches and drips juglone from leaves Nuts and hulls and branches onto plants below. Juglone is most concentrated in the buds, nut hulls and All parts of the black walnut tree produce roots and, to a lesser degree, in leaves and stems. Plants toxic juglone to varying degrees. located beneath the canopy of walnut trees are most at risk. In general, the toxic zone around a mature walnut tree is within 50 to 60 feet of the trunk, but can extend to 80 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • DEER RESISTANT PLANTS Recommended for Coastal Southeast Landscapes
    DEER RESISTANT PLANTS Recommended for Coastal Southeast Landscapes Hungry deer can devastate landscape plants in just a matter of a few nights. While it is true that some plants like azaleas and blueberries are preferred food sources for white-tailed deer, there are many attractive landscape selections that are less palatable and less frequently damaged by deer. KEY TO LIST One of the easiest ways to reduce deer damage in your yard is to landscape with plants deer prefer not to eat. This fact sheet is intended to serve as a guide for choosing landscape plants resistant to deer feeding in North Carolina. Since a starving deer will eat anything to stay alive, no plant is guaranteed! Tips on Deer and Plants No plant is deer proof! When hungry, deer will eat anything to survive. During stressful times such as drought, plants that are usually avoided may be damaged. Deer will eat almost anything in spring, as tender new growth emerges from plants. Deer prefer vegetation that is soft to the touch and high in water content. They especially relish flower buds. Over fertilized and over watered plants are particularly lush and appealing to deer. The plants deer prefer not to eat have common characteristics: Thorny or prickly leaves or stems Strong scents and pungent tastes, such as herbs Poisonous parts Thick, latex-like sap Hairy leaves Using a combination of a variety of methods to deter deer will give the most dependable results. To find out more about additional strategies to minimize deer damage in your landscape, visit the online publications listed at the end of this fact sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • White Fringetree As a Novel Larval Host for Emerald Ash Borer
    Journal of Economic Entomology Advance Access published January 15, 2015 RAPID COMMUNICATION White Fringetree as a Novel Larval Host for Emerald Ash Borer DON CIPOLLINI Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH 45435, USA E-mail: [email protected] J. Econ. Entomol. 1–6 (2015); DOI: 10.1093/jee/tou026 ABSTRACT Emerald ash borer is an invasive Asian pest of ash species in North America. All North American species of ash tested so far are susceptible to it, but there are no published reports of this insect developing fully in non-ash hosts in the field in North America. I report here evidence that emerald ash borer can attack and complete development in white fringetree, Chionanthus virginicus L., a species native to the southeastern United States that is also planted ornamentally. Four of 20 mature ornamental white fringetrees examined in the Dayton, Ohio area showed external symptoms of emerald ash borer attack, including the presence of adult exit holes, canopy dieback, and bark splitting and other deformities. Removal of bark from one of these trees yielded evidence of at least three generations of usage by emerald ash borer larvae, several actively feeding live larvae, and a dead adult confirmed as emerald ash borer. KEY WORDS Buprestidae, emerald ash borer, host range, Oleaceae, white fringetree Introduction trees continue to decline in number (Powell Gardens The emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (Fairm- 2014). aire) (Buprestidae), is an invasive Asian pest of ash In the only investigation of the potential use of white (Fraxinus spp.) species in North America.
    [Show full text]