The Eurobond Market-Its Use and Misuse

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Eurobond Market-Its Use and Misuse FRBSF WEEKLY LETTER June 10, 1988 The Eurobond Market-Its Use and Misuse This Letter discusses the growth, structure, and subject to the same registration requirements and attributes of the Eurobond market. An aspect of other regulations as domestic bonds, Eurobonds this market that has attracted relatively little can be issued on very short notice. An entire is­ attention is the attractiveness of Eurobonds aris­ sue may be underwritten by a single commercial ing from motives related to tax evasion. or investment bank, and the secondary market is well developed. What's a Eurobond? A Eurobond is a bond issued by a corporation or Issuers of Eurobonds almost exclusively have public agency outside the national jurisdiction of been large highly-rated corporations and govern­ any country, and generally not registered in or mental agencies. In most cases these issuers also subject to regulation by any government. It may are active borrowers in their own domestic mar­ or may not be denominated in the same currency kets. Even though "Euro" and domestic bond as that of the issuer's home country. The Euro­ markets often handle issues by the same firms in bond market sprang up in the mid-1970s, and the same currencies, there is evidence that the grew rapidly in scope until recently, particu- Euro and domestic markets nevertheless are seg­ larly between 1981 and 1986. In 1987, issuance mented. Researchers have demonstrated that tapered off somewhat, leading to speculation instruments in the two markets are imperfect about the demise of the market. However, like substitutes. Considerable spreads between rates Mark Twain, reports of its demise are premature. on otherwise comparable instruments issued in the domestic and the Euro markets often prevail. Because Eurobonds are issued outside of the Sometimes these spreads are positive, and some­ country of the issuer, they generally are exempt times negative. "Clientele effects;' where issuers from most regulations, restrictions, and taxes that and investors are imperfectly mobile across mar­ would apply to comparable domestic bonds. It is kets, seem to playa role in determining the estimated that about $750 billion of Eurobonds magnitude and sign of these spreads. currently are outstanding (including non-dollar bonds), with daily turnover in the secondary mar­ Several factors may help to explain why these cli­ ket of about $13 billion. entele effects exist. First, there is the question of legal jurisdiction, recourse, and enforcement. It Initially, Eurobonds were issued primarily in may be more difficult for the holder of a Euro­ fixed-rate form and denominated primarily in bond than a domestic bond to sue the issuer or U.S. dollars. Since the early 1980s, increasing to force the issuer into bankruptcy. Indeed, it is numbers of new issues are denominated in other not even clear how and where such legal pro­ currencies. Eurobonds also increasingly include ceedings would take place. This question of legal floating interest rate pricing (with and without enforceability of claims may be the reason that "caps" and "collars"), conversion features, and Eurobonds generally contain few, if any, restric­ warrants, among other things. Eurobonds fre­ tive covenants. The legal questions also may quently are combined with swap agreements by explain why the Eurobond market is dominated the issuers. on the issuers' side by highly-rated borrowers. The market for Eurobonds Differences in registration and disclosure require­ The primary market for Eurobonds is a direct ments are another factor explaining both the placement market. Issuers generally sell directly existence of Eurobonds and the differences be­ to investors without a public auction for the se­ tween the pricing of these bonds and domestic curities. Unlike domestic bonds, Eurobonds are bonds. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Com­ bearer bonds; the identity of the investor is not mission provided impetus to the development of recorded. Moreover, because Eurobonds are not the Eurobond market when it announced in 1964 FRBSF that any public offering would be exempt from Prior to July 1984, non-U.s. investors holding u.s. u.s. registration if it "is made under circum­ domestically-issued securities were subject to stances reasonably designed to preclude distribu­ withholding tax. This provided an impetus for the tion or redistribution of the securities within, or issuance of Eurobonds through financial inter­ to nationals of, the United States;' and is carried mediaries outside the United States. Eurobonds out "in a manner which will result in the se­ issued by U.S. firms in the Netherland Antilles curities coming to rest abroad:' Eurobond issues enabled foreign investors to purchase U.S. se­ thus avoid the costs and delays associated with curities comparable to domestic securities, but registration of domestic securities. Moreover, in exempt from withholding. In many instances, for­ practice, the SEC waives Eurobond registration as eign investors could have recovered the U.S. long as the security is not sold directly to u.s. withholding tax on comparable domestic se­ investors during an initial 90-day "seasoning curities by meeting certain conditions, including period:' (Eurobonds brought back into the U.S. demonstrating that taxes were being paid on the are supposed to be registered. It is possible that interest to the investor's home government. How­ many are not.) Thereafter, the security may be ever, many foreign investors in domestic bonds traded in the u.s. Indeed, because Eurobonds are preferred not to recover taxes withheld, presum­ bearer bonds, it probably is quite easy for a u.s. ably because they were not reporting the income investor to purchase the security at issue (during at home. This suggests both that the "expense" the seasoning period) through an intermediary. of reporting outweighed the loss due to withhold­ ing, and that many overseas investments in dol­ The taxation of Eurobond interest lar bonds. may have been held for purposes of tax The third and perhaps most important feature evasion. that separates the Eurobond from the domestic bond market is the differing tax treatment of the The U.S. withholding tax for foreign investors in two types of instruments. Unlike domestic bonds, U.s. securities was repealed in July 1984. Yet Eurobonds issued by U.S. firms traditionally were Eurobond issuance continued to grow, perhaps (until 1984) exempt from u.s. withholding tax. in part because it still is easier to hide the iden­ Other Eurobonds often are exempt from with­ tity of investors in unregistered Eurobonds than holding tax in other countries. A non-U.s. in­ in domestic securities. Many investors in Euro­ vestor who buys a Eurobond issued before 1984 bonds make purchases through custodian ac­ by a u.s. firm outside the United States essen­ counts at Swiss banks. It has been estimated that tially would be exempt from u.s. taxation. Bond in the past 40 to 60 percent of all Eurobonds earnings might be subject to taxation in the in­ were held in such portfolios. Some of these funds vestor's own country, in the same way that U.S. undoubtedly were savings that went undetected investors' earnings on Eurobonds are subject to and untaxed in their countries of origin. The U.S. taxation of interest income. Eurobonds may provide both tax-free interest to such portfolios as well as an absence of a paper In addition to legitimate business and investment trail leading to the savers who deposited the orig­ reasons for holding Eurobonds, there may be in­ inal principal. vestors who choose to hold Eurobonds to evade taxation. Because Eurobonds are in bearer form Eurobond investment may represent a large flow and the identity of the owner never is recorded, it of undetected and untaxed income for Ameri­ is difficult to trace interest income on Eurobonds. cans. But the misuse of Eurobonds probably is an Thus, investors may be able to avoid reporting in­ even more serious problem in other countries, come from this source and thereby evade taxa­ particularly newly developing countries. Euro­ tion in their home country. bonds may be the destination for some of the "flight capital" leaving such countries. In other This does not mean that all or even most Euro­ cases, funds invested in Eurobonds may originate bond investors are tax evaders. But it does mean in criminal activity. Eurobonds are attractive to that the market may be misused for tax evasion these investors because they offer the security of by some. It also means ~hat tax evasion has sig­ low default risk and protection from high inflation nificance for the structure of and pricing in the and currency depreciation, together with discre­ Eurobond market. tion and secrecy. A Fourth of July firecracker Alive and well The bulk of Eurobonds issued by u.s. firms tradi­ Over the past year, the Eurobond market de­ tionally were issued through financial subsidiar­ clined sharply and returned to its 1985 levels. ies in the Netherlands Antilles. Generally, such The 1987 decline was related to a number of fac­ Eurobonds were issued with a provision stating tors, including the October stock market crash, that the bond becomes callable in the event of the fall of the u.S. dollar, high real interest rates any change in tax laws or treaties that would af­ on bonds, diminishing Eurobond profit margins, fect the bond, including withholding taxes. On and some complaints about trading and mar­ July 4, 1987, the u.s. Treasury Department an­ keting procedures. The July 4 action of the U.S. nounced a 30 percent withholding tax on Euro­ Treasury compounded the jitters in this market. bonds that had been issued by u.s. firms in the Even so, the non-U.S. dollar segment of the Euro­ Netherlands Antilles before 1984, ending a 40­ bond market actually grew in 1987, and U.s.
Recommended publications
  • Credit Spread Arbitrage in Emerging Eurobond Markets
    Credit Spread Arbitrage in Emerging Eurobond Markets Caio Ibsen Rodrigues de Almeida *,a ** Antonio Marcos Duarte, Jr. *** Cristiano Augusto Coelho Fernandes Abstract Simulating the movements of term structures of interest rates plays an important role when optimally allocating portfolios in fixed income markets. These movements allow the generation of scenarios that provide the assets’ sensitivity to the fluctuation of interest rates. The problem becomes even more interesting when the portfolio is international. In this case, there is a need to synchronize the different scenarios for the movements of the interest rate curves in each country. An important factor to consider, in this context, is credit risk. For instance, in the corporate Emerging Eurobond fixed income market there are two main sources of credit risk: sovereign risk and the relative credit among the companies issuers of the eurobonds. This article presents a model to estimate, in a one step procedure, both the term structure of interest rates and the credit spread function of a diversified international portfolio of eurobonds, with different credit ratings. The estimated term structures can be used to analyze credit spread arbitrage opportunities in Eurobond markets. Numerical examples taken from the Argentinean, Brazilian and Mexican Eurobond markets are presented to illustrate the practical use of the methodology. Please address all correspondence to: Antonio Marcos Duarte, Jr., Director Risk Management Unibanco S.A. Av. Eusébio Matoso, 891 / 5 andar 05423-901 São Paulo, SP, Brazil Phone: 55-11-30971668 Fax: 55-11-30974276 a The first author acknowledges the financial support granted by FAPERJ * Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Debt Securities
    Clifford Chance LLP An introduction to 10 Upper Bank Street, London, E14 5JJ Switchboard: +44 (0)20 7006 1000 Fax: +44 (0)20 7006 5555 n debt securities o www.cliffordchance.com i n a p m o C s ’ r e r u s a e r A debt security is any instrument which is, or may be Types of debt security T traded more or less freely among investors in the market. Securities are either expressed to be payable to the I Commercial paper g n bearer or state that entitlement is determined by reference Commercial paper is normally created pursuant to a i d to a register of holders. Bearer securities will usually be programme and, when issued in the Euromarket, is n u f “negotiable instruments”. Broadly speaking, this means that commonly called “Euro-commercial paper” (ECP). An ECP d title to the security can be transferred by mere delivery and programme will provide for the issue of ECP notes (usually n a that the transferee is unaffected by any third party claim for a period of one or three months, but can be up to 12 s t against the transferor. In practice, bearer securities are months) from time to time at short notice to one or more e k usually lodged with a depository or custodian for safe- dealers on a non-committed basis at a price agreed at the r a keeping, because of the risk of loss or theft, and are traded time. ECP is usually non-interest bearing and is, therefore, m l through clearing systems such as Euroclear and Clearstream, issued at a discount to face value.
    [Show full text]
  • Doubleline Asset Allocation Webcast Recap
    DoubleLine Asset Allocation Webcast Recap About this Webcast Recap On May 5, 2020, Deputy Chief Investment Officer Jeffrey Sherman, CFA held a webcast discussing the DoubleLine Core Fixed Income (DBLFX/DLFNX), DoubleLine Flexible Income (DFLEX/DLINX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond (DBLSX/DLSNX) Funds. This recap is not intended to represent a complete transcript of the webcast. It is not intended as solicitation to buy or sell securities. If you are interested in hearing more of Mr. Sherman’s views, please listen to the full version of this webcast on www.doublelinefunds.com on the “Webcasts” tab under “Latest Webcast”. You can use the “Jump To” feature to navigate to each slide. DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund Performance Annualized Quarter-End Returns Since Inception March 31, 2020 1Q2020 Year-to-Date 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years (6-1-10 to 3-31-20) I-share (DBLFX) -3.29% -3.29% 1.42% 2.54% 2.35% 4.67% N-share (DLFNX) -3.45% -3.45% 1.17% 2.29% 2.07% 4.41% Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index 3.15% 3.15% 8.93% 4.82% 3.36% 3.75% Gross Expense Ratio: I-share 0.48%; N-share 0.73% DoubleLine Flexible Income Fund Performance Annualized Quarter-End Returns Since Inception March 31, 2020 1Q2020 Year-to-Date 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years (4-7-14 to 3-31-20) I-share (DFLEX) -12.56% -12.56% -9.06% -0.90% 0.63% 1.16% N-share (DLINX) -12.63% -12.63% -9.30% -1.19% 0.36% 0.90% ICE BAML 1-3 Year Eurodollar Index -0.40% -0.40% 2.96% 2.46% 2.02% 1.89% LIBOR USD 3 Month 0.43% 0.43% 2.14% 2.03% 1.46% 1.27% Gross Expense Ratio: I-share 0.76%; N-share 1.01% DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Performance Annualized Since Inception Quarter-End Returns (9-30-11 to 3-31- March 31, 2020 1Q2020 Year-to-Date 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 20) I-share (DBLSX) -4.40% -4.40% -1.59% 1.10% 1.45% 1.87% N-share (DLSNX) -4.47% -4.47% -1.84% 0.85% 1.20% 1.61% ICE BAML 1-3 Year U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of African Eurobond Markets. Its Causes and Possible Implications for Domestic Financial Markets
    The birth of African Eurobond markets. Its causes and possible implications for domestic financial markets Anne Löscher1 Abstract As the recent international financial crisis unfolded in 2007/08 leading to asset prices and interest rates to slump, financial capital around the globe started to search for new investment opportunities. This flight of international capital allowed several African countries to issue US-Dollar denominated sovereign debt on a large scale, as African Eurobonds combined high yields with the relative safety of government bonds in times of an uncertain investment environment. There are two main research questions addressed by the paper: (1) What were the causes for this recent development; and: (2) What are its resulting effects? To answer question (1) the concepts of the international currency hierarchy and the original sin are chosen as starting point to analyse the phenomenon of recent sovereign Eurobond issuance in African economies. The currency hierarchy is the underlying cause for foreign currency dependency of developing and emerging markets for imports, debt service and the conduct of monetary policies, which in turn results in export dependency and debt denominated in hard currencies. Governments in many African countries managed – often with the help of de-risking policies – to attract international financial capital to go into newly issued bonds temporarily filling in this gap. Question (2) includes the inquiry on what effects this surge in public external debt denominated in foreign exchange might have on domestic financial markets and overall development prospects. The paper finds that the nascent sovereign bond issuance by many African governments is fully in line with literature on the deleterious effects of the international currency hierarchy and international financialisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reaching a New Investor Base Via the ICSD Model
    EUROBOND OPPORTUNITIES FOR APAC ISSUERS Reaching a New Investor Base via the ICSD Model EUROBOND OPPORTUNITIES FOR APAC ISSUERS Reaching a New Investor Base via the ICSD Model The international bond market, commonly known as the Eurobond market, encompasses a diversified range of fixed income debt securities products, ranging from short-term to extremely long-term (or even perpetual) debt, and from plain vanilla bonds to structured instruments. At the end of the second quarter of 2020, Clearstream/Euroclear figures show that the market hosted €10.7 trillion in outstanding issuance from thousands of financial and nonfinancial companies, with bonds in scores of currencies (although issuance in dollars, euros, yen, and The increasing role of Asia sterling predominates). -Pacific, and in particular “Despite their name, Eurobonds can be issued in any currency, including China, in the global the issuer’s home currency, and do not have to be issued and/or placed economy means that in Europe,” says Rosa Scappatura, Head of ICSDs Relationships at international investors’ BNY Mellon Corporate Trust. “Instead, the common features of these allocations to bonds from products are that they are issued internationally (typically outside the market where the borrower resides) and through the International the region are growing as Central Securities Depositories (ICSDs) (Clearstream and Euroclear).” they add exposure. The Eurobond name is a legacy of the first issuances in the 1960s denominated in U.S. dollars and placed with European investors. From the start of the market, and especially today, the market has always been global in nature. Asia-Pacific borrowers have accessed the Eurobond market for decades, but issuance has grown strongly in the past decade.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Eurobond” Proposal: a Challenging Path Towards Integration
    MUTUALIZATION The “eurobond” proposal: A challenging path towards integration Discussions over the creation of a eurobond date back prior to the creation of the single currency itself. No matter how strong political opposition may be, as long as cross- border capital markets are still inefficient at assessing sovereign risk and averting moral hazard, eurobonds will be necessary and the debate will persist. Erik Jones Abstract: Despite being a recurrent theme advantages and risks. On the positive side, in discussions over euro area reform, the such an instrument would provide increased eurobond proposal seems to be gaining little legal clarity in the event of a restructuring, as traction as regards its conversion into actual well as create a large class of relatively risk- policy. Various concepts of the eurobond date free assets. However, risks related to legal back prior to even the creation of the euro itself. certainty, political control, financial liability The most recent proposals for a mutualized and finally, moral hazard make it politically sovereign debt instrument contain both difficult to sell to an already sceptical public. 3 In this context, the European alternative is to Minister and Eurogroup President with real push for greater national responsibility and powers to promote structural reform at the to support that with limited forms of Member State level; he suggested that this conditional lending. The question is whether new Economics and Finance Minister have or not such an alternative will be sufficient. access to a euro-area budget line within the Cross-border capital markets are still Commission’s financial framework; and, he inefficient at assessing sovereign risk and insisted that every EU Member State accept averting moral hazard – particularly, but its obligation to join the euro.
    [Show full text]
  • Will COVID-19 Reduce the Resistance to Eurobonds?
    ECMI Event Report | 2 April 2020 Will COVID-19 reduce the resistance to eurobonds? Apostolos Thomadakis* With the spread of COVID-19 across Europe, governments and central banks are mobilising resources to avoid a deep recession, growing unemployment and corporate failures. The issuance of joint eurozone debt, or so-called eurobonds, could ensure the necessary fiscal resources to tackle the crisis. Are eurobonds a solution to the current challenges and how should such an instrument be designed? Who would issue the eurobonds and how would they be traded? Where would clearing and settlement take place? This webinar considered the practical aspects (and conveniences) of a common euro bond. Speakers: Vítor Constâncio, Former Vice President of the ECB, and current President at the School Council at ISEG, University of Lisbon Maria Cannata, Chair of MTS Markets and former Director General of the Public Debt Directorate, Italian Treasury Moderated by Karel Lannoo, CEO of CEPS and General Manager of ECMI * Apostolos Thomadakis is Researcher at ECMI. The report is not a transcript of the speakers’ interventions; rather, it should be understood as an interpretation of their views by the author. Will COVID-19 reduce the resistance to eurobonds? Summary While eurobonds have existed since the 1960s,1 interest in them reignited during the sovereign crisis, but as real ‘euro’-bonds. That was an effort to avoid countries losing access to markets, also in the future. The current systemic shock in Europe is a completely different situation.2 The resources mobilised by governments and central banks in recent weeks are unlikely to be sufficient to avoid a deep recession, growing unemployment and corporate failures.3 COVID-19 demands that the response be as big and far-reaching as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Eurobond Market
    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 12 Number 3 Article 2 Summer 1987 An Overview of the Eurobond Market Virginia K. Trioa Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Part of the Commercial Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Virginia K. Trioa, An Overview of the Eurobond Market, 12 N.C. J. INT'L L. 331 (1987). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol12/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Overview of the Eurobond Market Virginia K. Troia* I. Introduction A. Development of the Eurobond Market Throughout the 1950s and early 1960s the U.S. capital market was the primary source of funds for international borrowers. The reasons for the United States' financial leadership at this time in- cluded the fact that the U.S. economy was the only major economy that had survived World War II not only in good condition but in stronger condition than it had been in at the beginning of the war; the U.S. dollar, at the time, was the only major freely convertible currency and the U.S. financial markets were the only financial mar- kets that had the needed financial resources. However, these uncontrolled capital exports from the United States quickly put the United States in an unfavorable balance of pay- ments position.
    [Show full text]
  • Issuing International Bonds: a Guidance Note1 Patrick B.G
    Public Disclosure Authorized DISCUSSION Issuing International PAPER MTI Global Practice Bonds Public Disclosure Authorized A Guidance Note No. 13 April 2019 Patrick B. G. van der Wansem Lars Jessen Diego Rivetti Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized This series is produced by the Macroeconomics, Trade, and Investment (MTI) Global Practice of the World Bank. The papers in this series aim to provide a vehicle for publishing preliminary results on MTI topics to encourage discussion and debate. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. Citation and the use of material presented in this series should take into account this provisional character. For information regarding the MTI Discussion Paper Series, please contact the Editor, Ivailo Izvorski, at [email protected]. © 2019 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 All rights reserved ii MTI DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 13 Abstract Financial conditions in recent years have provided developing countries with unprecedented opportunities to tap international bond markets, increasing access to commercial debt financing. On that background, developing countries are broadening the range of debt instruments employed in implementing debt management strategies, and this has changed the risk profile of their public debt portfolios. The target audience of this Discussion Paper is the sovereign debt manager, with a special focus on first time/infrequent issuer in Low Income Developing Countries.
    [Show full text]
  • By Temple University in Partial. Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree Or in Part. Signature of Author Certified By
    FINANCING OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH PROPERTY SPECIFIC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES by STEPHEN J. MURPHY Bachelor of Architecture Temple University (1981) Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial. Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Masters of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 1987 @Stephen J. Murphy 1987 The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author_ /,t-ephen / . urphy Departmefit of Arc ecture July 31,1987 Certified by iviarp- Louargand Visiting Associ e Professor Department of Urban Studie and Planning Thesis Supervisor Accepted by_____ ____________ Michael Wheeler Chairman Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development FINANCING OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH PROPERTY SPECIFIC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES by Stephen J. Murphy Submitted to the Department of Architecture on July 31, 1987 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Masters of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to identify issues relevant to real estate professionals considering the financing of commercial real estate assets through the public or private sale of mortgage backed securities. Currently, two categories of securitized debt issues have emerged; financings of individual, specified properties, and financings of pools of mortgages, in which the underlying mortgages may or may not be specified. This paper limits its examination to property specific financings. This paper describes the development of the mortgage backed securities and the security markets. It also examines the alternative issuing structures for property specific securities, risk assesment methodologies, and the component costs of capital raised.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Relations Release Allianz Jumbo Eurobond Generates Strong
    Investor Relations Release Allianz Jumbo Eurobond Generates Strong Demand Allianz AG has issued a eurobond with a volume of two billion euros through its Dutch financing subsidiary Allianz Finance II B.V. The bond was placed on the capital market with exceptional success. The issue is rated “AA” by Standard & Poor’s and “Aa2” by Moody’s and was four times oversubscribed. The issue was placed on the market in two tranches with a five-year and a ten-year maturity. Both tranches have a fixed coupon. The overwhelming demand triggered an increase in the total volume from 1.0 to 2.0 billion euros and the interest rate was set at the lower end of the bookbuilding range. The investor’s return is 4.735 % for the five-year tranche and 5.665 % for the ten-year tranche. “We were able to satisfy different segments of demand by dividing the issue into two tranches with different terms”, explained Stephan Theissing, Head of Corporate Finance at Allianz AG. “Interest rates are at a historically low level. In addition, investors have high levels of liquidity because of the lack in new offerings – and we have taken advantage of this situation,” continued Theissing. With orders exceeding 8 billion euros, the bond was more than four times oversubscribed. The bank syndicate comprises Deutsche Bank, Dresdner Bank, Schroder Salomon Smith Barney and UBS Warburg. A listing on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange is anticipated. Allianz is also planning the placement of a subordinated bond with a volume amounting to at least 500 million US dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • WPC Eurobond B.V
    PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To prospectus dated November 8, 2016) 20NOV201213010286 A500,000,000 WPC Eurobond B.V. 2.250% Senior Notes due 2026 Fully, Unconditionally and Irrevocably Guaranteed by W. P. Carey Inc. Interest payable on April 9 WPC Eurobond B.V. (the ‘‘Issuer’’) is offering A500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 2.250% Senior Notes due 2026 (the ‘‘notes’’). The notes will be issued in book-entry form only, in minimum denominations of A100,000 and integral multiples of A1,000 in excess thereof. The Issuer will pay interest annually in arrears on April 9 of each year, beginning on April 9, 2019. The notes will mature on April 9, 2026. However, the Issuer may, at its option, redeem the notes, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at the applicable redemption price described in this prospectus supplement under the caption ‘‘Supplemental description of the notes and guarantee—Optional redemption.’’ The notes will be senior unsecured obligations of the Issuer and will rank equally in right of payment with all of its other senior unsecured indebtedness from time to time outstanding. The notes will be fully, unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed (the ‘‘guarantee’’) on a senior unsecured basis by W. P. Carey Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), the indirect parent company of the Issuer. The Company’s guarantee will rank equally in right of payment with its other senior unsecured indebtedness and guarantees. Investing in the notes involves risks. Before making a decision to invest in the notes, you should carefully read the
    [Show full text]