Reaching a New Investor Base Via the ICSD Model
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Clearstream: General Court Confirms Commission Decision
Antitrust Clearstream: General Court confirms Commission Decision Rosalind Bufton and Eduardo Martínez Rivero (1) 1 On 9 September 2009 the Court of First Instance and settlement services. Clearstream Banking AG is (now the General Court) dismissed the action for Germany’s only CSD. annulment (2) brought by Clearstream Banking AG (also known as Clearstream Banking Frankfurt or 1.2. The 2004 Decision CBF) and Clearstream International SA against the 2 June 2004 Commission decision in the Clearstream The Commission decision found that Clearstream case. The decision had found that Clearstream Banking AG enjoyed a dominant position in the Banking AG and its parent company Clearstream market for the provision of ‘primary’ clearing and International SA violated Article 82 EC (now Art- settlement services for securities issued under Ger- icle 102 TFEU) by refusing to supply certain clear- man law to CSDs in other Member States and to ing and settlement services to one of its customers international central securities depositories (IC- 3 (Euroclear Bank SA), and by applying discrimina- SDs) ( ). For certain categories of companies seek- tory prices to that same customer. ing to provide efficient and less costly services to their customers, the decision found that the use of 1. Background ‘secondary’ clearing and settlement through an in- termediary could not be a substitute for access to ‘primary’ clearing and settlement services as it does 1.1. Clearing and settlement not offer the same level of service. It also found Clearing and settlement services are necessary steps that Clearstream Banking AG, together with its par- for a securities trade to be completed. -
ISIN Guidelines 2018
ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL NUMBERING AGENCIES scrl ISIN UNIFORM GUIDELINES RELATING TO ISO 6166 (8th edition) Version 14: March 2018 Implementation date by National Numbering Agencies: April 16, 2018 ANNA - ISIN Uniform Guidelines 2018 Page 1 of 18 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. EXCEPTIONS 4 2.1. SPECIFIC CASES RELATING TO FUNGIBILITY 4 2.2. GUIDANCE RELATING TO ALLOCATION RULES 6 2.3. COUNTRY SPECIFIC ASSIGNMENT PRACTICES 9 3. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS OTHER THAN SECURITIES 10 4. CONSEQUENCES OF CORPORATE ACTIONS 12 5. SUBSTITUTE NUMBERING AGENCIES (SNAS) 15 6. RE-USE OF ISIN CODES 15 7. ISIN CODE STRUCTURE 16 8. ISIN DOCUMENTATION 16 9. LEI & ISIN LINKAGE 16 10. NUMBERING AGENCIES NOT IN LINE WITH THE GUIDELINES 17 11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SCOPE OF ISO 6166 17 12. FOOTNOTES 17 ANNA - ISIN Uniform Guidelines 2018 Page 2 of 18 ISIN Guidelines 2018 1. INTRODUCTION The ISO 6166 standard describes the structure of the ISIN codes and which organizations are allowed to allocate ISIN codes to which securities. Competence on the allocation and maintenance of ISIN codes is split between NNAs and DSB, a numbering agency designed to operate on a global basis as regards the OTC derivatives. The aim of these guidelines is to obtain a uniform process among the various National Numbering Agencies for the allocation of ISIN codes under their competence. In line with the ISIN Quality Management concept, as defined by the Association of National Numbering Agencies (ANNA, registration authority for ISO 6166), we encourage the use of the list of Operational Contacts - as indicated on ANNA web for the majority of NNAs - to ensure timely and proper allocation of ISIN codes. -
Automated Securities Lending Programme Product Guide Automated Securities Lending Programme
Automated Securities Lending Programme Product Guide Automated Securities Lending Programme Clearstream Banking AG, Frankfurt Document number: F-GSF13 January 2018 This document is the property of Clearstream Banking AG. (“Clearstream Banking”). No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, for any purpose without the express written consent of Clearstream Banking. Information in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of Clearstream Banking, or any other entity belonging to Clearstream Banking. © Copyright Clearstream Banking AG (2017). All rights reserved. Clearstream and Xemac® are registered trademarks of Clearstream Banking AG. Foreword This guide (the “Product Guide”January 2018) describes the Clearstream Banking Frankfurt (CBF) Automated Securities Lending Programme, a lending service as defined in the Special Conditions for Securities Lending of Clearstream Banking AG, Frankfurt and in the Supplementary Conditions to the Special Conditions for Securities Lending of Clearstream Banking AG, Frankfurt. The Special Conditions for Securities Lending of Clearstream Banking AG, Frankfurt together with the Supplementary Conditions to the Special Conditions for Securities Lending of Clearstream Banking AG, Frankfurt are governing documents for the use of the Automated Securities Lending Programme and prevail over this Product Guide. The agreement is governed exclusively by German law, which means that it benefits from clear, efficient and protective laws on securities and pledges. Client Services The daily administration of the Automated Securities Lending Programme is handled by a dedicated team in Frankfurt as follows: Securities Lending Frankfurt Tel.: +49-(0) 69 - 2 11-1 31 80 Fax: +49-(0) 69 - 2 11-61 31 80 Email:[email protected] Service hours: 08:00 to 17:451. -
Clearstream Global Securities Financing the Global Liquidity Hub Excellence in Collateral Management
Clearstream Global Securities Financing The Global Liquidity Hub Excellence in collateral management Live since 2009 24/7 Real-time Across locations Across timezones Across asset classes Innovative solutions Award-winning service Clearstream’s world-leading Global Liquidity Hub encompasses a pioneering, comprehensive and flexible The Global Liquidity Hub regularly suite of products which deliver advanced collateral receives top marks in industry surveys such as the Global Custodian Triparty management and securities lending and borrowing for Securities Financing Survey and the both financial and non-financial institutions worldwide. Global Investor / ISF Triparty Survey. Clearstream is always particularly We’ve turned a vision into reality commended for its outstanding collateral management services The Global Liquidity Hub was launched offers a comprehensive collateral and its efficient customer service. in 2009 but is built on Clearstream’s management and securities financing long-standing experience in post- environment. Our highly sophisticated trade services. Indeed, we were the systems enable customers to manage first supplier to launch triparty repo their collateral efficiently in real-time, in Europe in 1992. Today, Clearstream’s regardless of asset class, location award-winning Global Liquidity Hub or timezone. A global priority How the Global New regulations adopted in the wake of the financial crisis require systemic Liquidity Hub changes for many financial institutions and corporate treasuries. The current regulatory focus on risk management has a major impact on the way institutions works for you around the world securitise their exposures. In a nutshell, the whole market will need to optimise collateral to make the most of their assets. The Global Liquidity Hub’s open architecture maximises opportunities for customers. -
Credit Spread Arbitrage in Emerging Eurobond Markets
Credit Spread Arbitrage in Emerging Eurobond Markets Caio Ibsen Rodrigues de Almeida *,a ** Antonio Marcos Duarte, Jr. *** Cristiano Augusto Coelho Fernandes Abstract Simulating the movements of term structures of interest rates plays an important role when optimally allocating portfolios in fixed income markets. These movements allow the generation of scenarios that provide the assets’ sensitivity to the fluctuation of interest rates. The problem becomes even more interesting when the portfolio is international. In this case, there is a need to synchronize the different scenarios for the movements of the interest rate curves in each country. An important factor to consider, in this context, is credit risk. For instance, in the corporate Emerging Eurobond fixed income market there are two main sources of credit risk: sovereign risk and the relative credit among the companies issuers of the eurobonds. This article presents a model to estimate, in a one step procedure, both the term structure of interest rates and the credit spread function of a diversified international portfolio of eurobonds, with different credit ratings. The estimated term structures can be used to analyze credit spread arbitrage opportunities in Eurobond markets. Numerical examples taken from the Argentinean, Brazilian and Mexican Eurobond markets are presented to illustrate the practical use of the methodology. Please address all correspondence to: Antonio Marcos Duarte, Jr., Director Risk Management Unibanco S.A. Av. Eusébio Matoso, 891 / 5 andar 05423-901 São Paulo, SP, Brazil Phone: 55-11-30971668 Fax: 55-11-30974276 a The first author acknowledges the financial support granted by FAPERJ * Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. -
An Introduction to Debt Securities
Clifford Chance LLP An introduction to 10 Upper Bank Street, London, E14 5JJ Switchboard: +44 (0)20 7006 1000 Fax: +44 (0)20 7006 5555 n debt securities o www.cliffordchance.com i n a p m o C s ’ r e r u s a e r A debt security is any instrument which is, or may be Types of debt security T traded more or less freely among investors in the market. Securities are either expressed to be payable to the I Commercial paper g n bearer or state that entitlement is determined by reference Commercial paper is normally created pursuant to a i d to a register of holders. Bearer securities will usually be programme and, when issued in the Euromarket, is n u f “negotiable instruments”. Broadly speaking, this means that commonly called “Euro-commercial paper” (ECP). An ECP d title to the security can be transferred by mere delivery and programme will provide for the issue of ECP notes (usually n a that the transferee is unaffected by any third party claim for a period of one or three months, but can be up to 12 s t against the transferor. In practice, bearer securities are months) from time to time at short notice to one or more e k usually lodged with a depository or custodian for safe- dealers on a non-committed basis at a price agreed at the r a keeping, because of the risk of loss or theft, and are traded time. ECP is usually non-interest bearing and is, therefore, m l through clearing systems such as Euroclear and Clearstream, issued at a discount to face value. -
Doubleline Asset Allocation Webcast Recap
DoubleLine Asset Allocation Webcast Recap About this Webcast Recap On May 5, 2020, Deputy Chief Investment Officer Jeffrey Sherman, CFA held a webcast discussing the DoubleLine Core Fixed Income (DBLFX/DLFNX), DoubleLine Flexible Income (DFLEX/DLINX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond (DBLSX/DLSNX) Funds. This recap is not intended to represent a complete transcript of the webcast. It is not intended as solicitation to buy or sell securities. If you are interested in hearing more of Mr. Sherman’s views, please listen to the full version of this webcast on www.doublelinefunds.com on the “Webcasts” tab under “Latest Webcast”. You can use the “Jump To” feature to navigate to each slide. DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund Performance Annualized Quarter-End Returns Since Inception March 31, 2020 1Q2020 Year-to-Date 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years (6-1-10 to 3-31-20) I-share (DBLFX) -3.29% -3.29% 1.42% 2.54% 2.35% 4.67% N-share (DLFNX) -3.45% -3.45% 1.17% 2.29% 2.07% 4.41% Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index 3.15% 3.15% 8.93% 4.82% 3.36% 3.75% Gross Expense Ratio: I-share 0.48%; N-share 0.73% DoubleLine Flexible Income Fund Performance Annualized Quarter-End Returns Since Inception March 31, 2020 1Q2020 Year-to-Date 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years (4-7-14 to 3-31-20) I-share (DFLEX) -12.56% -12.56% -9.06% -0.90% 0.63% 1.16% N-share (DLINX) -12.63% -12.63% -9.30% -1.19% 0.36% 0.90% ICE BAML 1-3 Year Eurodollar Index -0.40% -0.40% 2.96% 2.46% 2.02% 1.89% LIBOR USD 3 Month 0.43% 0.43% 2.14% 2.03% 1.46% 1.27% Gross Expense Ratio: I-share 0.76%; N-share 1.01% DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Performance Annualized Since Inception Quarter-End Returns (9-30-11 to 3-31- March 31, 2020 1Q2020 Year-to-Date 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 20) I-share (DBLSX) -4.40% -4.40% -1.59% 1.10% 1.45% 1.87% N-share (DLSNX) -4.47% -4.47% -1.84% 0.85% 1.20% 1.61% ICE BAML 1-3 Year U.S. -
The Eurobond Market-Its Use and Misuse
FRBSF WEEKLY LETTER June 10, 1988 The Eurobond Market-Its Use and Misuse This Letter discusses the growth, structure, and subject to the same registration requirements and attributes of the Eurobond market. An aspect of other regulations as domestic bonds, Eurobonds this market that has attracted relatively little can be issued on very short notice. An entire is attention is the attractiveness of Eurobonds aris sue may be underwritten by a single commercial ing from motives related to tax evasion. or investment bank, and the secondary market is well developed. What's a Eurobond? A Eurobond is a bond issued by a corporation or Issuers of Eurobonds almost exclusively have public agency outside the national jurisdiction of been large highly-rated corporations and govern any country, and generally not registered in or mental agencies. In most cases these issuers also subject to regulation by any government. It may are active borrowers in their own domestic mar or may not be denominated in the same currency kets. Even though "Euro" and domestic bond as that of the issuer's home country. The Euro markets often handle issues by the same firms in bond market sprang up in the mid-1970s, and the same currencies, there is evidence that the grew rapidly in scope until recently, particu- Euro and domestic markets nevertheless are seg larly between 1981 and 1986. In 1987, issuance mented. Researchers have demonstrated that tapered off somewhat, leading to speculation instruments in the two markets are imperfect about the demise of the market. However, like substitutes. Considerable spreads between rates Mark Twain, reports of its demise are premature. -
Creation Quick Tax Reference Matrix Disclaimer
Creation Quick Tax Reference Matrix Disclaimer This Quick Tax Reference Matrix is intended as a high-level overview of applicable tax rates and documents to be submitted by Clearstream Banking customers that use the Creation platform to Clearstream Banking for obtaining relief at source from, or by refund of, taxes applied at source to securities deposited in Clearstream Banking. It is not designed to give comprehensive information concerning all taxation issues relating to securities held with Clearstream Banking, including those mentioned in this document, nor to give exhaustive information on tax relief available by virtue of domestic or international law. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. Clearstream Banking believes the information provided in this Quick Tax Reference Matrix to be correct at the time of publication, but disclaims responsibility as to the accuracy and completeness of the information. Note: Customers must refer to the following sources of information in the order indicated to obtain complete information and to obtain copies of most of the documents that are mentioned in this Quick Tax Reference Matrix: 1. Market Taxation Guide; 2. Clearstream Banking Announcements; 3. Customer Service Tax Help Desk. The Quick Tax Reference Matrix is currently applicable for customers using the Creation platform only. Average refund time The estimated time for receiving a refund can vary depending on the time that the application is filed and the complexity of the information supplied in the reclaim form. Clearstream Banking has collected the information published in the “Average refund time” column of the Quick Tax Reference Matrix from sources considered reliable but does not guarantee the accuracy of the timings presented. -
The Birth of African Eurobond Markets. Its Causes and Possible Implications for Domestic Financial Markets
The birth of African Eurobond markets. Its causes and possible implications for domestic financial markets Anne Löscher1 Abstract As the recent international financial crisis unfolded in 2007/08 leading to asset prices and interest rates to slump, financial capital around the globe started to search for new investment opportunities. This flight of international capital allowed several African countries to issue US-Dollar denominated sovereign debt on a large scale, as African Eurobonds combined high yields with the relative safety of government bonds in times of an uncertain investment environment. There are two main research questions addressed by the paper: (1) What were the causes for this recent development; and: (2) What are its resulting effects? To answer question (1) the concepts of the international currency hierarchy and the original sin are chosen as starting point to analyse the phenomenon of recent sovereign Eurobond issuance in African economies. The currency hierarchy is the underlying cause for foreign currency dependency of developing and emerging markets for imports, debt service and the conduct of monetary policies, which in turn results in export dependency and debt denominated in hard currencies. Governments in many African countries managed – often with the help of de-risking policies – to attract international financial capital to go into newly issued bonds temporarily filling in this gap. Question (2) includes the inquiry on what effects this surge in public external debt denominated in foreign exchange might have on domestic financial markets and overall development prospects. The paper finds that the nascent sovereign bond issuance by many African governments is fully in line with literature on the deleterious effects of the international currency hierarchy and international financialisation. -
Economic Paper 163. Giovannini Group. Cross-Border Clearing And
ECONOMIC PAPERS EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance Number 163 February 2002 The Giovannini Group Cross-border clearing and settlement arrangements in the European Union Brussels, November 2001 ECFIN/112/02-EN This paper only exists in English. ©European Communities, 2002 FOREWORD The evolution of the European economy is the result of the interaction of markets and technical progress. On this interaction are superimposed government initiatives - which should be, and are generally, aimed at reforming national institutions towards greater economic efficiency – as well as co-ordinating initiatives conceived and developed at the European level. Such co-ordination ensures that efficiency- inducing reforms at the national level satisfy compatibility criteria defined by the free movement of goods, services and people within Europe. In the financial field, the most important co-ordinating initiative has been the process of monetary integration and the elimination of national discretion in the management of monetary policies and of flexible exchange rates within Europe. The initiatives grouped under the Financial Services Action Plan are designed to strengthen the European financial industry, by encouraging both free access and competition, and the creation of more efficient markets. The financial industry contributes to efficient allocation of capital and risk in an economy and it is a fundamental infrastructure that permits other economic activities to function and develop efficiently. This infrastructure needs in turn another infrastructure, both physical and non-physical, in order to function properly. The latter includes financial market rules and regulations, a payments system, and a system to permit the exchange of financial assets. -
The “Eurobond” Proposal: a Challenging Path Towards Integration
MUTUALIZATION The “eurobond” proposal: A challenging path towards integration Discussions over the creation of a eurobond date back prior to the creation of the single currency itself. No matter how strong political opposition may be, as long as cross- border capital markets are still inefficient at assessing sovereign risk and averting moral hazard, eurobonds will be necessary and the debate will persist. Erik Jones Abstract: Despite being a recurrent theme advantages and risks. On the positive side, in discussions over euro area reform, the such an instrument would provide increased eurobond proposal seems to be gaining little legal clarity in the event of a restructuring, as traction as regards its conversion into actual well as create a large class of relatively risk- policy. Various concepts of the eurobond date free assets. However, risks related to legal back prior to even the creation of the euro itself. certainty, political control, financial liability The most recent proposals for a mutualized and finally, moral hazard make it politically sovereign debt instrument contain both difficult to sell to an already sceptical public. 3 In this context, the European alternative is to Minister and Eurogroup President with real push for greater national responsibility and powers to promote structural reform at the to support that with limited forms of Member State level; he suggested that this conditional lending. The question is whether new Economics and Finance Minister have or not such an alternative will be sufficient. access to a euro-area budget line within the Cross-border capital markets are still Commission’s financial framework; and, he inefficient at assessing sovereign risk and insisted that every EU Member State accept averting moral hazard – particularly, but its obligation to join the euro.