DOCSLIB.ORG

Law Debenture V Ukraine Final Judgment Subject to Editorial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Law Debenture V Ukraine Final Judgment Subject to Editorial Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 655 (Comm) Case No: FL-2016-000002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION COMMERCIAL COURT FINANCIAL LIST Royal Courts of Justice, Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 29/03/2017 Before : MR JUSTICE BLAIR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : The Law Debenture Trust Corporation P.L.C Claimant - and - Ukraine, represented by the Minister of Finance of Defendant Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mark Howard QC and Oliver Jones (instructed by Norton Rose Fulbright LLP) for the Claimant Bankim Thanki QC, Malcolm Shaw QC and Simon Atrill (instructed by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 17-19 January 2017 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Judgment Approved by the court for handing down (subject to editorial corrections) If this Judgment has been emailed to you it is to be treated as ‘read-only’. You should send any suggested amendments as a separate Word document. Judgment Approved by the court for handing down The Law Debenture Trust v Ukraine (subject to editorial corrections) Mr Justice Blair: ​ Introduction The parties and the proceedings 1. This is an application by the claimant for summary judgment in respect of non-payment of Notes in the form of debt instruments that are commonly called Eurobonds. Summary judgment is the procedure by which the court may decide a claim without a trial, where the claimant can show that the defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim. 2. The claimant (the “Trustee”) is The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc. It is a company incorporated under the laws of England. It is trustee under a Trust Deed which was (or was purportedly) entered into with the defendant on 24 December 2013. It is a professional provider of such services, and as explained below, it brings these proceedings on the direction of the Russian Ministry of Finance. The Russian Federation (“Russia”) is the sole holder of these Notes. 3. The defendant (“Ukraine”) is the State of Ukraine. It is the issuer of the Notes. It is represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine is referred to in the evidence and in this judgment as the “CMU”). 4. Ukraine’s case is that Russia applied massive, unlawful and illegitimate economic and political pressure to Ukraine in 2013 to deter the administration led by President Viktor Yanukovych from signing an Association Agreement with the European Union, which was to have been signed at the Vilnius Summit on 28 November 2013, and to accept Russian financial support instead. The Notes were to be the first tranche of that support. Ukraine’s case, opposed by the Trustee, is that the borrowing resulted from that pressure, and that for this and other reasons, its non-payment of the Notes is justified, and that in any event summary judgment is not appropriate. 5. Evidence has been filed in the form of witness statements by: i) Julian Robert Mason-Jebb, Director of The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc; ii) Galina Danylivna Pakhachuk, Head of the Debt Policy Department of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine; iii) Olena Mykolaiivna Zubchenko, Partner in the Finance and Banking Law Department of the Ukraine law firm Lavrynovych & Partners (which advised the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine); iiii) Oleksandr Oleksandrovych Danyliuk, the Minister of Finance of Ukraine; v) Volodymyr Andriiovych Pasichnyk, Head of the Division for Budget and Tax Policy, the CMU Secretariat; vi) Alexander Joseph Gerbi, Partner in Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan UK LLP, acting for Ukraine in these proceedings 6. In addition, Ukraine filed Expert Reports on Ukrainian law by Professor William E. Butler, the John Edward Fowler Distinguished Professor of Law, Dickinson School of Law, Pennsylvania State University. 7. In addition to the evidence, each party filed written submissions and a chronology. 8. As regards the facts: i) Some of the facts, for example as to the documentation relating to the transaction in issue, are not in dispute. ii) Other facts, for example those maintained by Ukraine in its defence, are or may be in dispute. iii) Disputed issues of fact are not normally capable of determination on a summary judgment application such as is before the court. iiii) With some exceptions, the Trustee accepts that the court will proceed on the basis of Ukraine’s factual case, whilst stating, “This is not to say, however, that the Trustee does not have very serious concerns about the plausibility or veracity of many of the matters advanced by Ukraine”. The factual framework 9. The full facts are set out elsewhere in this judgment. The following is the factual framework relating to the issuance of the Notes. 10. On 17 December 2013, President Putin of Russia and President Yanukovych announced Russia’s intention to subscribe for up to US$15 billion of Ukrainian sovereign debt before the end of 2014. This included an initial tranche of US$3 billion in the form of Eurobonds having a maturity of two years and a fixed interest rate of five per cent per annum. These are the Notes which are the subject of these proceedings. There was also to be a substantial reduction in the price of gas to be supplied by Russia to Ukraine. 11. On 18 December 2013, there was a meeting of the CMU which adopted or purportedly adopted Decree No.904 concerning the borrowing of the US$3 billion. The facts concerning this meeting form an important part of Ukraine’s capacity defence (see below). 12. On 24 December 2013, a Trust Deed was (or was purportedly) entered into between Ukraine and the Trustee as part of a transaction by which Ukraine issued US$3 billion notes (the “Notes”) due on 20 December 2015 carrying interest at 5% payable bi- annually. 13. According to the evidence, such instruments governed by English law are often constituted by a trust deed. The issuer appoints a trustee to represent the interests of the holders, for the time being, of the instruments, with the practical consequence that litigation generally has to be brought via the trustee. In fact, the claimant in these proceedings is the Trustee, not the Noteholders. 14. The Notes were constituted by the Trust Deed, which is governed by English law, the English courts having exclusive jurisdiction. By the terms of the Trust Deed, Ukraine waived sovereign immunity. Jurisdiction is not at issue in this case. 15. It is not in dispute that instruments of this kind are tradable instruments, though Russia acquired the entire issuance, and Ukraine’s case is that Russia had no intention of transferring the Notes. 16. On 20 December 2013: i) Ukraine’s Minister of Finance signed a Subscription Agreement with VTB Capital plc, part of the Russian investment banking group, as Sole Lead Manager for the issuance of the Notes. ii) The Prospectus for the issuance of the Notes was published by Ukraine. The Prospectus states that it was approved by the Central Bank of Ireland. It was required so that the Notes could be listed on the Irish Stock Exchange. iii) Both parties have referred to and relied on the Prospectus. It includes a section on “Risk Factors Relating to Ukraine”, including a reference to the possibility of “punitive measures” by Russia should Ukraine sign in the future the Association Agreement with the EU. 17. The transaction came into effect on 24 December 2013. On that day: i) Ukraine’s Minister of Finance signed the Trust Deed and other documentation relating to the Notes issue. ii) This documentation included an Agency Agreement between Ukraine, the Trustee and Citibank, N.A., London Branch (“Citibank”) and others, pursuant to which Citibank would act as Principal Paying Agent and Registrar in respect of the Notes (the “Agency Agreement”). iii) The Notes were issued. The Russian Ministry of Finance was the sole subscriber —in other words, Russia bought and paid for all the Notes. None of the Notes have since been transferred by Russia, which remains the only noteholder. iiii) The subscription money for the Notes was paid by Russia, and Ukraine received payment in the amount of US$3 billion into the foreign currency accounts of the Treasury. v) The Notes were listed on the Irish Stock Exchange. 18. There are full explanations of the structure of the transaction in the evidence of Mr Mason-Jebb for the Trustee, and in Ukraine’s evidence, particularly that of Ms Zubchenko. In summary, the issuer of the Notes was Ukraine, the trustee was The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc, the Paying Agent was Citibank, and the Notes were acquired by Russia on issuance. 19. Ukraine’s case is that the CMU’s decision on 21 November 2013 to suspend preparation for Ukraine’s signing of the EU Association Agreement resulted in mass protests in the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv. Following President Yanukovych’s decision not to sign at the Vilnius Summit on 28 November 2013, these protests grew significantly in size. President Yanukovych is reported to have fled Kyiv on 21 February 2014. 20. Shortly afterwards, Russia invaded Crimea. In addition to the invasion, Ukraine’s case is that Russia has also fuelled and supported separatist elements in, interfered militarily in and succeeded in destabilising and causing huge destruction across eastern Ukraine. 21. During this period, Ukraine made payments under the Notes. Three bi-annual interest payments under the Notes totalling US$233,333,350 were paid by Ukraine during 2014 and 2015. 22. The Trustee relies on these payments in support of its case on ratification/ affirmation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Credit Spread Arbitrage in Emerging Eurobond Markets
    Credit Spread Arbitrage in Emerging Eurobond Markets Caio Ibsen Rodrigues de Almeida *,a ** Antonio Marcos Duarte, Jr. *** Cristiano Augusto Coelho Fernandes Abstract Simulating the movements of term structures of interest rates plays an important role when optimally allocating portfolios in fixed income markets. These movements allow the generation of scenarios that provide the assets’ sensitivity to the fluctuation of interest rates. The problem becomes even more interesting when the portfolio is international. In this case, there is a need to synchronize the different scenarios for the movements of the interest rate curves in each country. An important factor to consider, in this context, is credit risk. For instance, in the corporate Emerging Eurobond fixed income market there are two main sources of credit risk: sovereign risk and the relative credit among the companies issuers of the eurobonds. This article presents a model to estimate, in a one step procedure, both the term structure of interest rates and the credit spread function of a diversified international portfolio of eurobonds, with different credit ratings. The estimated term structures can be used to analyze credit spread arbitrage opportunities in Eurobond markets. Numerical examples taken from the Argentinean, Brazilian and Mexican Eurobond markets are presented to illustrate the practical use of the methodology. Please address all correspondence to: Antonio Marcos Duarte, Jr., Director Risk Management Unibanco S.A. Av. Eusébio Matoso, 891 / 5 andar 05423-901 São Paulo, SP, Brazil Phone: 55-11-30971668 Fax: 55-11-30974276 a The first author acknowledges the financial support granted by FAPERJ * Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Debt Securities
    Clifford Chance LLP An introduction to 10 Upper Bank Street, London, E14 5JJ Switchboard: +44 (0)20 7006 1000 Fax: +44 (0)20 7006 5555 n debt securities o www.cliffordchance.com i n a p m o C s ’ r e r u s a e r A debt security is any instrument which is, or may be Types of debt security T traded more or less freely among investors in the market. Securities are either expressed to be payable to the I Commercial paper g n bearer or state that entitlement is determined by reference Commercial paper is normally created pursuant to a i d to a register of holders. Bearer securities will usually be programme and, when issued in the Euromarket, is n u f “negotiable instruments”. Broadly speaking, this means that commonly called “Euro-commercial paper” (ECP). An ECP d title to the security can be transferred by mere delivery and programme will provide for the issue of ECP notes (usually n a that the transferee is unaffected by any third party claim for a period of one or three months, but can be up to 12 s t against the transferor. In practice, bearer securities are months) from time to time at short notice to one or more e k usually lodged with a depository or custodian for safe- dealers on a non-committed basis at a price agreed at the r a keeping, because of the risk of loss or theft, and are traded time. ECP is usually non-interest bearing and is, therefore, m l through clearing systems such as Euroclear and Clearstream, issued at a discount to face value.
    [Show full text]
  • Doubleline Asset Allocation Webcast Recap
    DoubleLine Asset Allocation Webcast Recap About this Webcast Recap On May 5, 2020, Deputy Chief Investment Officer Jeffrey Sherman, CFA held a webcast discussing the DoubleLine Core Fixed Income (DBLFX/DLFNX), DoubleLine Flexible Income (DFLEX/DLINX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond (DBLSX/DLSNX) Funds. This recap is not intended to represent a complete transcript of the webcast. It is not intended as solicitation to buy or sell securities. If you are interested in hearing more of Mr. Sherman’s views, please listen to the full version of this webcast on www.doublelinefunds.com on the “Webcasts” tab under “Latest Webcast”. You can use the “Jump To” feature to navigate to each slide. DoubleLine Core Fixed Income Fund Performance Annualized Quarter-End Returns Since Inception March 31, 2020 1Q2020 Year-to-Date 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years (6-1-10 to 3-31-20) I-share (DBLFX) -3.29% -3.29% 1.42% 2.54% 2.35% 4.67% N-share (DLFNX) -3.45% -3.45% 1.17% 2.29% 2.07% 4.41% Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index 3.15% 3.15% 8.93% 4.82% 3.36% 3.75% Gross Expense Ratio: I-share 0.48%; N-share 0.73% DoubleLine Flexible Income Fund Performance Annualized Quarter-End Returns Since Inception March 31, 2020 1Q2020 Year-to-Date 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years (4-7-14 to 3-31-20) I-share (DFLEX) -12.56% -12.56% -9.06% -0.90% 0.63% 1.16% N-share (DLINX) -12.63% -12.63% -9.30% -1.19% 0.36% 0.90% ICE BAML 1-3 Year Eurodollar Index -0.40% -0.40% 2.96% 2.46% 2.02% 1.89% LIBOR USD 3 Month 0.43% 0.43% 2.14% 2.03% 1.46% 1.27% Gross Expense Ratio: I-share 0.76%; N-share 1.01% DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Performance Annualized Since Inception Quarter-End Returns (9-30-11 to 3-31- March 31, 2020 1Q2020 Year-to-Date 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 20) I-share (DBLSX) -4.40% -4.40% -1.59% 1.10% 1.45% 1.87% N-share (DLSNX) -4.47% -4.47% -1.84% 0.85% 1.20% 1.61% ICE BAML 1-3 Year U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eurobond Market-Its Use and Misuse
    FRBSF WEEKLY LETTER June 10, 1988 The Eurobond Market-Its Use and Misuse This Letter discusses the growth, structure, and subject to the same registration requirements and attributes of the Eurobond market. An aspect of other regulations as domestic bonds, Eurobonds this market that has attracted relatively little can be issued on very short notice. An entire is­ attention is the attractiveness of Eurobonds aris­ sue may be underwritten by a single commercial ing from motives related to tax evasion. or investment bank, and the secondary market is well developed. What's a Eurobond? A Eurobond is a bond issued by a corporation or Issuers of Eurobonds almost exclusively have public agency outside the national jurisdiction of been large highly-rated corporations and govern­ any country, and generally not registered in or mental agencies. In most cases these issuers also subject to regulation by any government. It may are active borrowers in their own domestic mar­ or may not be denominated in the same currency kets. Even though "Euro" and domestic bond as that of the issuer's home country. The Euro­ markets often handle issues by the same firms in bond market sprang up in the mid-1970s, and the same currencies, there is evidence that the grew rapidly in scope until recently, particu- Euro and domestic markets nevertheless are seg­ larly between 1981 and 1986. In 1987, issuance mented. Researchers have demonstrated that tapered off somewhat, leading to speculation instruments in the two markets are imperfect about the demise of the market. However, like substitutes. Considerable spreads between rates Mark Twain, reports of its demise are premature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of African Eurobond Markets. Its Causes and Possible Implications for Domestic Financial Markets
    The birth of African Eurobond markets. Its causes and possible implications for domestic financial markets Anne Löscher1 Abstract As the recent international financial crisis unfolded in 2007/08 leading to asset prices and interest rates to slump, financial capital around the globe started to search for new investment opportunities. This flight of international capital allowed several African countries to issue US-Dollar denominated sovereign debt on a large scale, as African Eurobonds combined high yields with the relative safety of government bonds in times of an uncertain investment environment. There are two main research questions addressed by the paper: (1) What were the causes for this recent development; and: (2) What are its resulting effects? To answer question (1) the concepts of the international currency hierarchy and the original sin are chosen as starting point to analyse the phenomenon of recent sovereign Eurobond issuance in African economies. The currency hierarchy is the underlying cause for foreign currency dependency of developing and emerging markets for imports, debt service and the conduct of monetary policies, which in turn results in export dependency and debt denominated in hard currencies. Governments in many African countries managed – often with the help of de-risking policies – to attract international financial capital to go into newly issued bonds temporarily filling in this gap. Question (2) includes the inquiry on what effects this surge in public external debt denominated in foreign exchange might have on domestic financial markets and overall development prospects. The paper finds that the nascent sovereign bond issuance by many African governments is fully in line with literature on the deleterious effects of the international currency hierarchy and international financialisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reaching a New Investor Base Via the ICSD Model
    EUROBOND OPPORTUNITIES FOR APAC ISSUERS Reaching a New Investor Base via the ICSD Model EUROBOND OPPORTUNITIES FOR APAC ISSUERS Reaching a New Investor Base via the ICSD Model The international bond market, commonly known as the Eurobond market, encompasses a diversified range of fixed income debt securities products, ranging from short-term to extremely long-term (or even perpetual) debt, and from plain vanilla bonds to structured instruments. At the end of the second quarter of 2020, Clearstream/Euroclear figures show that the market hosted €10.7 trillion in outstanding issuance from thousands of financial and nonfinancial companies, with bonds in scores of currencies (although issuance in dollars, euros, yen, and The increasing role of Asia sterling predominates). -Pacific, and in particular “Despite their name, Eurobonds can be issued in any currency, including China, in the global the issuer’s home currency, and do not have to be issued and/or placed economy means that in Europe,” says Rosa Scappatura, Head of ICSDs Relationships at international investors’ BNY Mellon Corporate Trust. “Instead, the common features of these allocations to bonds from products are that they are issued internationally (typically outside the market where the borrower resides) and through the International the region are growing as Central Securities Depositories (ICSDs) (Clearstream and Euroclear).” they add exposure. The Eurobond name is a legacy of the first issuances in the 1960s denominated in U.S. dollars and placed with European investors. From the start of the market, and especially today, the market has always been global in nature. Asia-Pacific borrowers have accessed the Eurobond market for decades, but issuance has grown strongly in the past decade.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Eurobond” Proposal: a Challenging Path Towards Integration
    MUTUALIZATION The “eurobond” proposal: A challenging path towards integration Discussions over the creation of a eurobond date back prior to the creation of the single currency itself. No matter how strong political opposition may be, as long as cross- border capital markets are still inefficient at assessing sovereign risk and averting moral hazard, eurobonds will be necessary and the debate will persist. Erik Jones Abstract: Despite being a recurrent theme advantages and risks. On the positive side, in discussions over euro area reform, the such an instrument would provide increased eurobond proposal seems to be gaining little legal clarity in the event of a restructuring, as traction as regards its conversion into actual well as create a large class of relatively risk- policy. Various concepts of the eurobond date free assets. However, risks related to legal back prior to even the creation of the euro itself. certainty, political control, financial liability The most recent proposals for a mutualized and finally, moral hazard make it politically sovereign debt instrument contain both difficult to sell to an already sceptical public. 3 In this context, the European alternative is to Minister and Eurogroup President with real push for greater national responsibility and powers to promote structural reform at the to support that with limited forms of Member State level; he suggested that this conditional lending. The question is whether new Economics and Finance Minister have or not such an alternative will be sufficient. access to a euro-area budget line within the Cross-border capital markets are still Commission’s financial framework; and, he inefficient at assessing sovereign risk and insisted that every EU Member State accept averting moral hazard – particularly, but its obligation to join the euro.
    [Show full text]
  • Will COVID-19 Reduce the Resistance to Eurobonds?
    ECMI Event Report | 2 April 2020 Will COVID-19 reduce the resistance to eurobonds? Apostolos Thomadakis* With the spread of COVID-19 across Europe, governments and central banks are mobilising resources to avoid a deep recession, growing unemployment and corporate failures. The issuance of joint eurozone debt, or so-called eurobonds, could ensure the necessary fiscal resources to tackle the crisis. Are eurobonds a solution to the current challenges and how should such an instrument be designed? Who would issue the eurobonds and how would they be traded? Where would clearing and settlement take place? This webinar considered the practical aspects (and conveniences) of a common euro bond. Speakers: Vítor Constâncio, Former Vice President of the ECB, and current President at the School Council at ISEG, University of Lisbon Maria Cannata, Chair of MTS Markets and former Director General of the Public Debt Directorate, Italian Treasury Moderated by Karel Lannoo, CEO of CEPS and General Manager of ECMI * Apostolos Thomadakis is Researcher at ECMI. The report is not a transcript of the speakers’ interventions; rather, it should be understood as an interpretation of their views by the author. Will COVID-19 reduce the resistance to eurobonds? Summary While eurobonds have existed since the 1960s,1 interest in them reignited during the sovereign crisis, but as real ‘euro’-bonds. That was an effort to avoid countries losing access to markets, also in the future. The current systemic shock in Europe is a completely different situation.2 The resources mobilised by governments and central banks in recent weeks are unlikely to be sufficient to avoid a deep recession, growing unemployment and corporate failures.3 COVID-19 demands that the response be as big and far-reaching as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Eurobond Market
    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 12 Number 3 Article 2 Summer 1987 An Overview of the Eurobond Market Virginia K. Trioa Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Part of the Commercial Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Virginia K. Trioa, An Overview of the Eurobond Market, 12 N.C. J. INT'L L. 331 (1987). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol12/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Overview of the Eurobond Market Virginia K. Troia* I. Introduction A. Development of the Eurobond Market Throughout the 1950s and early 1960s the U.S. capital market was the primary source of funds for international borrowers. The reasons for the United States' financial leadership at this time in- cluded the fact that the U.S. economy was the only major economy that had survived World War II not only in good condition but in stronger condition than it had been in at the beginning of the war; the U.S. dollar, at the time, was the only major freely convertible currency and the U.S. financial markets were the only financial mar- kets that had the needed financial resources. However, these uncontrolled capital exports from the United States quickly put the United States in an unfavorable balance of pay- ments position.
    [Show full text]
  • Issuing International Bonds: a Guidance Note1 Patrick B.G
    Public Disclosure Authorized DISCUSSION Issuing International PAPER MTI Global Practice Bonds Public Disclosure Authorized A Guidance Note No. 13 April 2019 Patrick B. G. van der Wansem Lars Jessen Diego Rivetti Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized This series is produced by the Macroeconomics, Trade, and Investment (MTI) Global Practice of the World Bank. The papers in this series aim to provide a vehicle for publishing preliminary results on MTI topics to encourage discussion and debate. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. Citation and the use of material presented in this series should take into account this provisional character. For information regarding the MTI Discussion Paper Series, please contact the Editor, Ivailo Izvorski, at [email protected]. © 2019 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 All rights reserved ii MTI DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 13 Abstract Financial conditions in recent years have provided developing countries with unprecedented opportunities to tap international bond markets, increasing access to commercial debt financing. On that background, developing countries are broadening the range of debt instruments employed in implementing debt management strategies, and this has changed the risk profile of their public debt portfolios. The target audience of this Discussion Paper is the sovereign debt manager, with a special focus on first time/infrequent issuer in Low Income Developing Countries.
    [Show full text]
  • By Temple University in Partial. Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree Or in Part. Signature of Author Certified By
    FINANCING OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH PROPERTY SPECIFIC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES by STEPHEN J. MURPHY Bachelor of Architecture Temple University (1981) Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial. Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Masters of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 1987 @Stephen J. Murphy 1987 The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author_ /,t-ephen / . urphy Departmefit of Arc ecture July 31,1987 Certified by iviarp- Louargand Visiting Associ e Professor Department of Urban Studie and Planning Thesis Supervisor Accepted by_____ ____________ Michael Wheeler Chairman Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development FINANCING OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH PROPERTY SPECIFIC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES by Stephen J. Murphy Submitted to the Department of Architecture on July 31, 1987 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Masters of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to identify issues relevant to real estate professionals considering the financing of commercial real estate assets through the public or private sale of mortgage backed securities. Currently, two categories of securitized debt issues have emerged; financings of individual, specified properties, and financings of pools of mortgages, in which the underlying mortgages may or may not be specified. This paper limits its examination to property specific financings. This paper describes the development of the mortgage backed securities and the security markets. It also examines the alternative issuing structures for property specific securities, risk assesment methodologies, and the component costs of capital raised.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Relations Release Allianz Jumbo Eurobond Generates Strong
    Investor Relations Release Allianz Jumbo Eurobond Generates Strong Demand Allianz AG has issued a eurobond with a volume of two billion euros through its Dutch financing subsidiary Allianz Finance II B.V. The bond was placed on the capital market with exceptional success. The issue is rated “AA” by Standard & Poor’s and “Aa2” by Moody’s and was four times oversubscribed. The issue was placed on the market in two tranches with a five-year and a ten-year maturity. Both tranches have a fixed coupon. The overwhelming demand triggered an increase in the total volume from 1.0 to 2.0 billion euros and the interest rate was set at the lower end of the bookbuilding range. The investor’s return is 4.735 % for the five-year tranche and 5.665 % for the ten-year tranche. “We were able to satisfy different segments of demand by dividing the issue into two tranches with different terms”, explained Stephan Theissing, Head of Corporate Finance at Allianz AG. “Interest rates are at a historically low level. In addition, investors have high levels of liquidity because of the lack in new offerings – and we have taken advantage of this situation,” continued Theissing. With orders exceeding 8 billion euros, the bond was more than four times oversubscribed. The bank syndicate comprises Deutsche Bank, Dresdner Bank, Schroder Salomon Smith Barney and UBS Warburg. A listing on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange is anticipated. Allianz is also planning the placement of a subordinated bond with a volume amounting to at least 500 million US dollars.
    [Show full text]