DOCSLIB.ORG

America's Micronesia Problem | the Diplomat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
America's Micronesia Problem | the Diplomat America’s Micronesia Problem | The Diplomat MENU SEARCH REGIONS ANA/国内線割引運賃「旅 CENTRAL ASIA EAST ASIA 割春夏の旅行も早めのご予約がおト ク！ 10月ご搭乗分まで販売中です。 OCEANIA SOUTH ASIA SOUTHEASTFEATURES ASIA DIPLOMACY OCEANIA TOPICS America’s Micronesia Problem BLOGSThe end of the CompactDIPLOMACY of Free Association with ECONOMY the Federated StatesENVIRONMENT of Micronesia would have serious repercussions. FEATURES INTERVIEWS By Thomas R. Matelski MAGAZINEFebruary 19, 2016 PHOTO ESSAYS PODCASTS POLITICS 5.1k Shares SECURITY SOCIETY In December 2015, in an oft overlooked corner of the Image Credit: U.S. Department of State THE globe, DIPLOMAT'S the Congress QUIZ VIDEOS of the Federated States of Micronesia (F.S.M.) introduced a BLOGS resolution* signifying the intent to end the Compact of Free Association with the United States of America in 2018. The two sides were in the process of discussing a potential renewal of the Compact CHINA when POWER it expires in 2023.FLASHPOINTS ASIAWhile DEFENSE the rest of theASEAN world BEAT watches events in the South China Sea and the East China Sea, the People’s Republic of China is positioning itself to be in the driver’s seat in an area of key strategic interest to the THE United PULSE States. If WashingtonTHE KOREAS fails to act in a timely manner to renew the sometimes troubled Compact relationship, it will inadvertently drive the Micronesians into the arms of China and simultaneously TOKYO REPORT THE DEBATE leave a gaping hole in strategic access. CROSSROADS ASIA THE REBALANCE A Compact History: A Lesson in Complex Co-Dependency PACIFICThe Compact MONEY of FreeASIA Association LIFE is a little known element of the complex web of relationships that spans the global interests of the United States of America. At the end of World War II, the United OCEANIA Nations established relationships between recently liberated Japanese Imperial holdings and the winning parties. As a result, the Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands (TTPI) were established by UN mandate (Security Council Resolution 21 signed July 18, 1947) and United States assumed responsibility for oversight. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s the U.S. developed and implemented the current civil code and mechanisms that are the basis of governance in the F.S.M. today. Beginning in the mid-1960s, moves towards autonomy in the region led to the establishment of the Commonwealth of Northern Marianas, Republic of Marshall Islands, Republic of Palau, and the Federated States of Micronesia. The Federated States of Micronesia consists of four districts: Kosrae, Pohnpei, Chuuk, and Yap. All the districts consists of multiple islands and atoll groupings that represent in excess of 2,600,000 square kilometers of land and territorial waters with a population slightly more than 100,000 citizens located strategically in the western portion of the North Pacific Ocean east of the Republic of the Philippines and north of Papua New Guinea. Historically, these islands were called the Caroline Islands and they http://thediplomat.com/2016/02/americas-micronesia-problem/[2016/04/19 17:42:21] America’s Micronesia Problem | The Diplomat Figure 1: Map of Federated States of Micronesia (www.fsmgov.org) As a key feature of the Compact, the United States provides for the defense of F.S.M. This allows F.S.M. to free up important resources while maintaining a small constabulary force consisting of a small paramilitary force in the Division of Maritime Surveillance. As members of the Compact, Micronesians can freely join the U.S. military without permanent residency or citizenship. The agreement allows the U.S. to maintain strategic access to Lines of Communication that extend into the East China and South China Sea and beyond, waters that account for a majority of the trade and energy commodities transiting through Asia. With approximately one-third of global trade and nearly 50 percent of energy commerce passing through the region, it’s understandable why U.S. security interests maintain visibility on F.S.M. Administration of the islands has been a source of tension between the local Micronesian people and the U.S. government since the establishment of the TTPI in 1947. The U.S. military (as administered by the U.S. Navy from Guam from 1947-1951) used many of the atolls in the region for open nuclear weapons testing, resulting in many diseases (cancer, birth abnormalities, and diabetes). In addition to the long-term health implications, continued resentment in the local populace remains below the surface. The Department of the Interior is the current U.S. government agency that manages the Compact relationship with F.S.M. through the mechanisms of the Joint Economic Management Committee (JEMCO). JEMCO’s purpose is to “strengthen management and accountability with regard to the assistance provided under the Compact, as amended, and to promote the effective use of funding provided thereunder.” The JEMCO relationship provides for joint oversight of the Compact, but is viewed as being overly favorable towards the U.S. side of the relationship. The Compact agreement allows free movement of F.S.M. citizens to the rest of the U.S. with legal non-immigrant status. The majority of Micronesians migrate to Hawaii, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands. The associated costs with the arrangement weigh heavily on already limited budgets in the destination states and countries. The U.S. Congress has authorized increased funding in the budget over the last few fiscal years to address these impacts. Both sides of the Compact relationship agree that there are economic, education, and healthcare concerns in F.S.M. It is solving those concerns where disagreement takes place, with Micronesians accusing the U.S. government of mismanagement and being too slow with development aid. The Department of the Interior’s Office of Insular Affairs in Honolulu also recognizes the unique set of challenges to F.S.M. and its neighbors and recently provided recommendations to Congressional leaders on how to address the concerns: “1) Addressing Freely Associated States (FAS) Out Migration 2) Improved coordination of Current Federal Programs and Funds 3) Establishment of Micronesian One-Stop Service Centers and 4) Establishing a Federal Interagency Group on Compact Impact Aid.” E di h C S Wh ? http://thediplomat.com/2016/02/americas-micronesia-problem/[2016/04/19 17:42:21] America’s Micronesia Problem | The Diplomat Although the Compact of Free Association with the Federated States of Micronesia is scheduled to expire in 2023, the process for renegotiating the relationship with the United States has been ongoing throughout the agreement’s history. The most recent amendment to the agreement took place in 2003 with the passing of Public Law 108-188 by the 108th U.S. Congress. This highlights the ability to periodically go back and address policy and implementation concerns. The move to end the Compact in 2018 is not only five years early, it disrupts the funding of programs that are mandated through a 15-year provision cycle. In the current amended agreement, annual mandatory financial assistance is scheduled to end in 2023 and be replaced with a general trust fund. The Trust Fund was established and continues to report annually in accordance with the amended 2003 Compact. Ending the Compact in 2018 impacts F.S.M. more than it does the U.S. For one thing, Micronesians currently living abroad will lose their immigration status and face a potential loss of federal benefits already being provided. In F.S.M.s view, the ending of the Compact provides an opportunity to redefine the relationship with the U.S. and set things on a more equal footing, replacing the existing junior-senior partner relationship with one between two independent sovereign nations. The most serious impact from the U.S. standpoint is in the provision of security and defense for F.S.M. If that is not provided by the United States, who then would be the guarantor of Micronesian security? This is where the People’s Republic of China enters the picture. China’s Growing Influence and the Second Island Chain Strategy At a time when news on the South China Sea disputes and the tensions in the East China Sea dominates the 24 hour news cycle, the growing Chinese influence in the Pacific islands seems to go generally unnoticed. However, Beijing’s growing presence has become of significant concern to many nations, including the U.S., Australia and New Zealand. The influence is generally low key, taking the form of a “soft power” approach that provides economic and developmental aid with “no strings attached.” As the investment and aid eclipses that provided by the U.S. and others in the region, Chinese influence carries more weight, including in foreign policy decisions, such as negotiations over the Compact of Free Association with F.S.M. Through numerous large-scale infrastructure investments (many of which are of questionable quality), small-scale programs and organizations, as well as the construction of Official Residences, the Chinese have demonstrated “a stark (difference) as the U.S. clearly and openly begun a process of decreased funding…leading to the end of the major bilateral agreement between it and the FSM.” Although concerns such as these were highlighted almost 10 years ago, Chinese investment is more noticeable now than ever. Overseas Developmental Assistance (ODA) from China has increased steadily since 2003, from minimal amounts to an officially reported total of $28 million. Anecdotal information estimates that the actual figure could be as much as three to four times higher. Reports of numerous trips by F.S.M. Congressional leaders to China only exacerbate the perceptions of influence and a reluctance to engage the U.S. Despite the relatively benign view of investment by the Chinese in F.S.M., the issues of maritime security and strategic access provide more cause for concern.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • El Niño and Its Impacts on Federated States of Micronesia – Pohnpei And
    El Niño and its Impacts on Federated States of Micronesia – Pohnpei and Kosrae What is El Niño? The El Niño – Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a recurring climate pattern involving changes in the temperature of waters in the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean and the patterns of sea level pressure, lower- and upper-level winds, and tropical rainfall across the Pacific basin. On periods ranging from about two to seven years, the surface waters across a large swath of the tropical Pacific Ocean warm or cool by anywhere from 1°C to 3°C, compared to normal. This irregular oscillation between warm and cool patterns, referred to as the ENSO cycle, directly affects rainfall distribution in the tropics and can have a strong influence on weather across the Pacific basin. El Niño and La Niña are the extreme phases of the ENSO cycle; between these two phases is a third phase called ENSO-neutral. ENSO-neutral: Under normal conditions strong El Niño in FSM trade winds blow from the east along the equator, pushing warm water into the western Pacific Ocean. Rainfall Less more at first, but then much less; longer and drier dry-season Trade Winds Less weaker, with occasional westerly winds Tropical Cyclones More increased risk, as more storms form closer to the islands El Niño conditions occur when abnormally warm Sea Level Less waters build in tropical region of the central and eastern Pacific Ocean and are usually associated with lower at first, then gradually recovering a weakening of the easterly trade winds, sometimes even reversing to westerlies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Failed Relationship: Micronesia and the United States of America Eddie Iosinto Yeichy*
    A Failed Relationship: Micronesia and the United States of America Eddie Iosinto Yeichy* I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 172 II. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MIRCORONESIA AND THE UNITED STATES .............................................................................................. 175 A. Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands ........................................ 175 B. Compact of Free Association.................................................... 177 III. UNITED STATES FAILURE TO FULFILL ITS LEGAL DUTIES .................. 178 A. Historical Failures ................................................................... 178 B. Modern Failures ....................................................................... 184 C. Proposed Truths for United States Failure ............................... 186 IV. PROPOSED SOLUTION: SOCIAL HEALING THROUGH JUSTICE FRAMEWORK .................................................................................... 186 A. Earlier Efforts of Reparation: Courts Tort Law Monetary Model ........................................................................................ 187 B. Professor Yamamoto’s Social Healing Through Justice Framework ............................................................................... 188 C. Application: Social Healing Through Justice Framework ....... 191 D. Clarifying COFA Legal Status .................................................. 193 V. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jesuitvolunteers.Org CHUUK, MICRONESIA Volunteer
    CHUUK, MICRONESIA MAU PIAILUG HOUSE JV Presence in Microneisa since 1985 Mailing Address Jesuit Volunteers [JV’s Name] Xavier High School PO Box 220 Chuuk, FSM 96942 Ph: 011-691-330-4266 Volunteer Accompaniment JVC Coordinator Emily Ferron (FJV Chuuk, 2010-12) [email protected] Local Formation Team Fr. Tom Benz, SJ Fr. Dennis Baker, SJ In-Country Coordinator Support Person [email protected] [email protected] Overview The term Micronesia is short for the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), and refers more accurately to geographic/cultural region (not dissimilar to terms such as Central America or the Caribbean). Micronesia contains four main countries (and a few little ones but we’ll focus on the main four): Republic of the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Republic of Palau, and Republic of Kiribati. Within Micronesia, there are many different cultural groups. For instance in FSM, there are four states, each uniquely different (culturally). Within one of those states, one can find different cultural groups as well (outer islands vs lagoon or main island). In some placements JVs have the opportunity to interact with many of these different culture groups from outside of the host island. For example, Xavier High School (in Chuuk), the student and staff/teacher population is truly international and representative of many of these cultural groups. The FSM consists of some 600 islands grouped into four states: Kosrae, Pohnpei, Chuuk (Truk) and Yap. Occupying a very small total land mass, it is scattered over an ocean expanse five times the size of France. With a population of 110,000, each cultural group has its own language, with English as the common language.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesuitvolunteers.Org POHNPEI, MICRONESIA Volunteer
    POHNPEI, MICRONESIA PAULINO CANTERO HOUSE JV Presence in Microneisa since 1985 Mailing Address Jesuit Volunteers [JV’s Name] PO Box 73 Pohnpei, FSM 96941 Ph: 011-691-320-3239 Volunteer Accompaniment JVC Coordinator Brooke Silvas (Rostro de Cristo, 2016-17) [email protected] Local Formation Team Sr. Christina Elias, MA Fr. Ken Urumolug, SJ In-Country Coordinator Support Person [email protected] [email protected] Overview The term Micronesia is short for the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), and refers more accurately to geographic/cultural region (not dissimilar to terms such as Central America or the Caribbean). Micronesia contains four main countries (and a few little ones but we’ll focus on the main four): Republic of the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Republic of Palau, and Republic of Kiribati. Within Micronesia, there are many different cultural groups. For instance in FSM, there are four states, each uniquely different (culturally). Within one of those states, one can find different cultural groups as well (outer islands vs lagoon or main island). In some placements JVs have the opportunity to interact with many of these different culture groups from outside of the host island. For example, Xavier High School (in Chuuk), the student and staff/teacher population is truly international and representative of many of these cultural groups. The FSM consists of some 600 islands grouped into four states: Kosrae, Pohnpei, Chuuk (Truk) and Yap. Occupying a very small total land mass, it is scattered over an ocean expanse five times the size of France. With a population of 110,000, each cultural group has its own language, with English as the common language.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia and Oceania: Physical Geography
    R E S O U R C E L I B R A R Y E N C Y C L O P E D I C E N T RY Australia and Oceania: Physical Geography Encyclopedic entry. Oceania is a region made up of thousands of islands throughout the South Pacific Ocean. G R A D E S 6 - 12+ S U B J E C T S Biology, Earth Science, Geology, Geography, Human Geography, Physical Geography C O N T E N T S 10 Images For the complete encyclopedic entry with media resources, visit: http://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/oceania-physical-geography/ Oceania is a region made up of thousands of islands throughout the Central and South Pacific Ocean. It includes Australia, the smallest continent in terms of total land area. Most of Australia and Oceania is under the Pacific, a vast body of water that is larger than all the Earth’s continental landmasses and islands combined. The name “Oceania” justly establishes the Pacific Ocean as the defining characteristic of the continent. Oceania is dominated by the nation of Australia. The other two major landmasses of Oceania are the microcontinent of Zealandia, which includes the country of New Zealand, and the eastern half of the island of New Guinea, made up of the nation of Papua New Guinea. Oceania also includes three island regions: Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia (including the U.S. state of Hawaii). Oceania’s physical geography, environment and resources, and human geography can be considered separately. Oceania can be divided into three island groups: continental islands, high islands, and low islands.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Pacific Island Allies
    America’s Pacific Island Allies The Freely Associated States and Chinese Influence Derek Grossman, Michael S. Chase, Gerard Finin, Wallace Gregson, Jeffrey W. Hornung, Logan Ma, Jordan R. Reimer, Alice Shih C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2973 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0228-8 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover photo: Palau islands by Adobe Stock / BlueOrange Studio. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Located north and northeast of Australia and east of the Philippines, the Freely Associated States (FAS)—comprising the independent countries of the Republic of Palau, the Federated States of Microne- sia (FSM), and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI)—occupy an ocean area roughly the size of the continental United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Polynesia and Micronesia: Sociocultural Aspects
    Polynesia and Micronesia: Sociocultural Aspects Stouffer S A, Suchman E A, DeVinney L C, Star S A, Williams marangi), in Micronesia to the northwest of the R M Jr 1965 [1949] The American Soldier: Adjustments During Polynesian Triangle. Army Life. Wiley, New York, Vol. 1 Micronesia forms a wide arc of small islands Traugott M W, Lavrakas P J 2000 The Voter’s Guide to Election spanning from the western region of Insular Southeast Polls , 2nd edn. Chatham House, New York Asia to the Central Pacific, comprising the following R. Y. Shapiro island groups: Palau and outlying islands, Guam and the Mariana Islands, Caroline Islands, Marshall Islands, Gilbert Islands, and two isolated islands, Nauru and Banaba (Ocean Island). Contemporary political considerations may include island groups of the Central Pacific like the Phoenix and Line Islands; Polynesia and Micronesia: Sociocultural although geographically located in the Polynesian Aspects Triangle, these islands, which were not permanently inhabited until the modern age, are governed by The two geographical areas commonly referred to as Kiribati, the modern state based in the Gilbert Islands. ‘Polynesia’ and ‘Micronesia’ consist of a scattering of With the exception of Guam, the islands of Micronesia relatively small and widely disseminated islands across are small, although some of the largest atolls in the the central, south, and northwestern Pacific Ocean. world are found in the region (e.g., Kwajalein in the The two areas are complementary to Melanesia, the Marshalls). third area customarily
    [Show full text]
  • The Toll of Natural Disasters on Education in Micronesia and the Needs of Education During Recovery
    International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education (IJTIE), Volume 8, Issue 2, December 2019 The Toll of Natural Disasters on Education in Micronesia and the Needs of Education During Recovery Michelle LaBrunda1, Mary Jane Miller2, Naushad Amin3 University of South Florida1 University of Guam2 GloMed LLC3 Abstract Micronesia is a large subregion of Oceana area is roughly divided into four main archipelagos located north of the equator in the Pacific Ocean. It each with numerous islands. The population is spans over 290,000 square miles and includes some around 600,000 [1]. The region is prone to 2500 islands, of which approximately 120 are numerous types of natural disasters due to its unique populated. While cultural trends exist, the region is geography and geology. Despite being one of the extremely diverse in its language and culture. most disaster-prone areas in the world, the area is Micronesia is located on the Ring-of-Fire and can be almost non-existent if one were to judge based on subject to a multitude of natural disasters including world media coverage. typhoons, earthquakes, floods, volcanic eruptions, Politically, Micronesia is divided into five tsunamis, and flooding due to climate change. Of countries and three US territories. The countries are these, typhoons, earthquakes, draughts, and flooding the Federated States of Micronesia, Palau, Kiribati, are most notable. Because the islands are remote, Marshall Islands and Nauru. The US territories are support small populations, and have frequent Guam, US Minor Outlying Islands, and the Northern disasters, humanitarian aid efforts in the region Mariana Islands. The Federated States of Micronesia require a unique approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Micronesia Challenge "We Are One" Business Plan
    We are One Business Plan and Conservation Campaign Micronesia Challenge This page: Natural wonders are found even in the smallest riffles, such as this one in Kosrae. ©KCSO. Cover: The Micronesia Challenge seeks to permanently protect mountain to reef habitats and the species that live within them, such as these Yellow Tail Fusiliers. ©Ethan Daniels/Shutterstock. Our wonders Your generosity A future secured We are One Help protect some of the most pristine, splendid environments on earth. The Micronesia Challenge brings together three nations, two territories, thousands of communities, and hundreds of international partners all working as one to permanently and effectively protect over 14,000 square kilometers of marine and terrestrial habitats. By helping us reach our goal of raising $55 million dollars for an endowment to support a wide range of annual conservation activities, you will help us protect thousands of unique and endemic species, and preserve a way of life for generations to come. Please, give generously to the Micronesia Challenge. We are Micronesia We are One Republic of Palau U.S. Territory of Guam U.S. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Federated States of Micronesia Republic of the Marshall Islands Micronesia is alike, yet different. Isolated, yet connected. Small, but immense. e are joined as one. For our children, and the world. 500,000 people. 2,000 islands. 12 languages. 5 Micronesian jurisdictions. From the top: Flags of Palau, Guam, CNMI, FSM, and RMI Underwater scenes such as this one highlight the variety of macro- and microfauna present on Micronesian Reefs. ©Isabelle Kuehn/Shutterstock. 30, 20, one Micronesia The Micronesia Challenge is a shared commitment to conserve at least 30% of near-shore marine resources and 20% of terrestrial resources across Micronesia by 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pholcid Spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae)
    Butler University Digital Commons @ Butler University Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS College of Liberal Arts & Sciences 2008 The pholcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae) Joseph A. Beatty James W. Berry Butler University, [email protected] Bernhard A. Huber Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers Part of the Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Beatty, Joseph A.; Berry, James W.; and Huber, Bernhard A., "The pholcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae)" Journal of Arachnology / (2008): 1-25. Available at https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers/782 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences at Digital Commons @ Butler University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Butler University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The pholcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae) Author(s): Joseph A. Beatty, James W. Berry, Bernhard A. Huber Source: Journal of Arachnology, 36(1):1-25. Published By: American Arachnological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/H05-66.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1636/H05-66.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use.
    [Show full text]
  • Micronesia Challenge
    Micronesia Challenge U.S. Coral Reef Task Force September 23, 2016 Evangeline Lujan Guam Focal Point What is the Micronesia Challenge? The Micronesia Challenge is a shared commitment to conserve at least 30% of near-shore marine resources and 20% of terrestrial resources across Micronesia by 2020. Why the Micronesia Unique cultures and geography Challenge? 500,000 people 2,000 islands 12 languages Global rarities 2 World Heritage Sites 3 Ramsar Wetlands 3 Biosphere Reserves 53 IUCN-listed threatened species Spectacular biodiversity 1,500 plant species 1,300 fish species 535 coral species © Robyn J What are the Goals of the Micronesia Challenge ? • Sustain our unique island biodiversity; • Ensure a healthy future for our island people; • Protect our unique island cultures; • Guard the foundations of our future development, our pristine island environments; • Sustain the livelihoods of our island communities; • Contribute to global and national targets History of the MC 2004 International community commits to Protected Areas (CBD COP 7, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) 2005 Palau invites chief executives from the Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, the Marshall Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands to join the Micronesia Challenge (MC), effectively conserving at least 30% of the near-shore marine resources and 20% of terrestrial resources across Micronesia by 2020, at the 12th US Coral Reef Task Force Meeting (Palau) 2006 Leaders from all five MC jurisdictions sign Micronesia Challenge declaration 1st MC Regional Action Planning meeting (Palau)
    [Show full text]
  • Island Towns
    Island Towns Managing Urbanization in Micronesia John Connell and John PLea Occasional Paper 40 Center for Pacific Islands Studies School of Hawaiian, Asian & Pacific Studies University ofHawai'i at Manoa Honolulu and Research Institute for Asia & the Pacific University of Sydney to 1998 by John Connell and John PLea The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of AusAID or any other body associated with it. ISSN 0897-8905 Contents Preface v Acknowledgments vii PART ONE: THE CONTEXT OF URBANIZATION IN MICRONESIA 1 1 Introduction 3 Urban Beginnings 17 2 Population Migration and Urbanization 35 The Demographic Structure 37 Migration in the Region 48 International Migration 60 3 Urban Economy and Society 80 The Urban Economy 86 Employment and Urban Society 97 Conclusion 105 PART Two: URBAN DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 109 4 Urban Management and Planning 110 Land-Use Planning Goals 114 Land-Use Planning in the Federated States of Micronesia 119 Urban Management in Kiribati 122 Urban Planning in the Marshall Islands 126 Master Planning in Palau 127 Strengthening Planning Capabilities in Micronesia 130 5 Urban Land Policy 135 Federated States of Micronesia 137 Kiribati 146 Marshall Islands 149 Palau 151 Addressing the Priorities 154 6 Housing 158 The Urban Housing Process in Micronesia 160 Housing Conditions in Micronesia 163 ,ji Housing Policy in the Micronesian Countries 169 It Accommodating Micronesia 177 7 Public Utilities 181 Water Supply, Sewage Treatment, and Waste Disposal 183 Palau 185 Power and
    [Show full text]