Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Monday, April 23, 2007 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions for Foreign Species; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:36 Apr 20, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\23APP2.SGM 23APP2 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_2 20184 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the above immediate publication of a proposed address. rule to list a species is precluded by Fish and Wildlife Service FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: higher-priority listing proposals, and Marie T. Maltese at the above address, expeditious progress is being made to 50 CFR Part 17 or by telephone, 703–358–1708; fax, add and remove species from the Lists, as appropriate. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 703–358–2276; or e-mail, [email protected]; or through Pursuant to section 4(b)(3)(C)(i) of the and Plants; Annual Notice of Findings Act, when, in response to a petition, we on Resubmitted Petitions for Foreign the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. find that listing a species is warranted Species; Annual Description of but precluded, we must make a new 12- Progress on Listing Actions SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: month finding annually until we publish a proposed rule or make a AGENCY: Background Fish and Wildlife Service, determination that listing is not Interior. The Endangered Species Act of 1973, warranted. These subsequent 12-month ACTION: Review of findings on petitions. as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et findings are referred to as ‘‘resubmitted’’ seq.), provides two mechanisms for petition findings. This notice contains SUMMARY: In this review, we announce considering species for listing. First, we our resubmitted petition findings for all our annual petition findings for foreign can identify and propose for listing foreign species that are currently the species, as required under section those species that are endangered or subject of outstanding petitions. 4(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Endangered Species threatened based on the factors Act of 1973, as amended. When, in contained in section 4(a)(1). We Previous Notices response to a petition, we find that implement this through the candidate The species discussed in this review listing a species is warranted but program. Candidate taxa are those taxa were the result of three separate precluded, we must complete a new for which we have sufficient petitions submitted to the Service to list status review each year until we publish information on file relating to biological a number of foreign bird and butterfly a proposed rule or make a determination vulnerability and threats to support a species as threatened or endangered that listing is not warranted. These proposal to list the taxa as endangered under the Act. We received petitions to subsequent status reviews and the or threatened, but for which preparation list foreign bird species on November accompanying 12-month findings are and publication of a proposed rule is 28, 1980, and April 30, 1991 (46 FR referred to as ‘‘resubmitted’’ petition precluded by higher-priority listing 26464 and 56 FR 58664 respectively). findings. actions. None of the species covered by On January 10, 1994, we received a Information contained in this review this review were assessed through the petition to list 7 butterfly species as describes our status review of 56 foreign candidate program; they were the result threatened or endangered (59 FR 24117). taxa that were the subjects of previous of public petitions to add species to the We took several actions on these warranted-but-precluded findings. Lists of Endangered and Threatened petitions, and to notify the public, we Based on our review, we find that 50 Wildlife and Plants (Lists), which is the published earlier petition findings, species continue to warrant listing, but other mechanism for considering status reviews, and petition finding that their listing remains precluded by species for listing. Under section reviews that included foreign species in higher-priority listing actions (see Table 4(b)(3)(A), when we receive such a the Federal Register on May 12, 1981 1). For six species previously found to petition, we must determine within 90 (46 FR 26464); January 20, 1984 (49 FR be warranted but precluded, listing is days, to the maximum extent 2485); May 10, 1985 (50 FR 19761); now warranted. We will promptly practicable, whether the petition January 9, 1986 (51 FR 996); July 7, 1988 publish a listing proposal for those six presents substantial scientific or (53 FR 25511); December 29, 1988 (53 species. commercial information indicating that FR 52747); January 6, 1989 (54 FR 554); With this review, we are requesting the petitioned action may be warranted November 21, 1991 (56 FR 58664); additional status information for the 50 (90-day finding). If we make a positive March 28, 1994 (59 FR 14496); May 10, species that remain warranted-but- 90-day finding, we are required to 1994 (59 FR 24117), and January 12, precluded by higher priority listing promptly commence a review of the 1995 (60 FR 2899). Our most recent actions. We will consider this status of the species. Section 4(b)(3)(B) review of petition findings was information in preparing listing of the Act requires that we must make published on May 21, 2004 (69 FR documents and future resubmitted one of three findings within 12 months 29354). petition findings. This information will of the receipt of the petition (12-month Since our last review of petition also help us to monitor the status of the finding). findings we have taken two listing taxa and in conserving them. The first possible 12-month finding is actions related to this notice. On that listing is not warranted, in which December 7, 2004, we published our 12- DATES: We will accept comments on case we need not take any further action month finding on a petition to list seven these resubmitted petition findings at on the petition. The second possibility foreign species of Swallowtail any time. is that we may find that listing is butterflies as threatened or endangered ADDRESSES: Submit any comments, warranted, in which case we must (69 FR 70580). We also published a information, and questions by mail to promptly publish a proposed rule to list proposed rule on November 22, 2006, to the Chief, Division of Scientific the species. Once we publish a list six foreign bird species as Authority, U.S. Fish and Wildlife proposed rule for a species, section endangered (71 FR 67530). Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room 4(b)(5) and (6) govern further 750, Arlington, Virginia 22203; by fax to procedures, regardless of whether or not Findings on Resubmitted Petitions 703–358–2276; or by e-mail to we issued the proposal in response to This review describes our resubmitted [email protected]. Comments the petition. The third possibility is that petition findings for 56 foreign species and supporting information will be we may find that listing is warranted for which we had previously found available for public inspection, by but precluded. A warranted-but- listing to be warranted but precluded. appointment, Monday through Friday precluded finding means that We have considered all of the new VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:36 Apr 20, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23APP2.SGM 23APP2 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL_2 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules 20185 information we have obtained since the on the wing at sea. The only time they Fiji petrel (Pterodroma macgillivrayi) previous findings. As a result of our spend any significant amount of time on The Fiji petrel is a marine species and review, we find that warranted-but- land is to breed and rear young, and presumably pelagic (del Hoyo et al. precluded findings remain appropriate these species require specific islands for 1992). It was originally known from just for 50 species. We emphasize that we reproduction and rearing fledglings. one specimen collected in 1855 on Gau are not proposing these species for Procellarids are long-lived species with Island and more recently from eight listing by this review, but we do low reproductive rates and juvenile records of sightings on the island since anticipate developing and publishing mortality is often high due to predation 1983 (BirdLife International 2000). The proposed listing rules for these species by introduced mammalian species. As is only other record is a reported sighting in the future, with an objective of common for all island nesting avian at sea over 200 km north of Gau progressively and conclusively species, they are vulnerable to (Watling 2000, as cited in BirdLife addressing all 50 foreign species within stochastic events, such as typhoons, International 2000). The Fiji petrel’s a reasonable time-frame. which could result in rapid population breeding grounds have not been Also as a result of this review, we find declines or unforeseen species discovered, but may be located in areas that for six species, listing is warranted. extinctions (Birdlife International 2006). of undisturbed mature forest, on rocky, We will promptly publish proposals to Based on information gathered and mountainous ground, or in the cloud list six species in the Family assessed since May 21, 2004 and forest highlands of Gau Island (del Hoyo Procellariidae (tube-nosed seabirds). December 7, 2004, we have updated our et al. 1992, Rare 2006). The species is These species include: the Fiji petrel determinations of whether listing of classified as Critically Endangered by (Pterodroma macgillivrayi), the these taxa continues to be warranted or the IUCN because it is inferred, given Chatham petrel (Pterodroma axillaris), warranted but precluded, or whether the paucity of recent records, that there Cook’s petrel (Pterodroma cookii), the listing is no longer warranted.
Recommended publications
  • Bird List Column A: 1 = 70-90% Chance Column B: 2 = 30-70% Chance Column C: 3 = 10-30% Chance
    Colombia: Chocó Prospective Bird List Column A: 1 = 70-90% chance Column B: 2 = 30-70% chance Column C: 3 = 10-30% chance A B C Tawny-breasted Tinamou 2 Nothocercus julius Highland Tinamou 3 Nothocercus bonapartei Great Tinamou 2 Tinamus major Berlepsch's Tinamou 3 Crypturellus berlepschi Little Tinamou 1 Crypturellus soui Choco Tinamou 3 Crypturellus kerriae Horned Screamer 2 Anhima cornuta Black-bellied Whistling-Duck 1 Dendrocygna autumnalis Fulvous Whistling-Duck 1 Dendrocygna bicolor Comb Duck 3 Sarkidiornis melanotos Muscovy Duck 3 Cairina moschata Torrent Duck 3 Merganetta armata Blue-winged Teal 3 Spatula discors Cinnamon Teal 2 Spatula cyanoptera Masked Duck 3 Nomonyx dominicus Gray-headed Chachalaca 1 Ortalis cinereiceps Colombian Chachalaca 1 Ortalis columbiana Baudo Guan 2 Penelope ortoni Crested Guan 3 Penelope purpurascens Cauca Guan 2 Penelope perspicax Wattled Guan 2 Aburria aburri Sickle-winged Guan 1 Chamaepetes goudotii Great Curassow 3 Crax rubra Tawny-faced Quail 3 Rhynchortyx cinctus Crested Bobwhite 2 Colinus cristatus Rufous-fronted Wood-Quail 2 Odontophorus erythrops Chestnut Wood-Quail 1 Odontophorus hyperythrus Least Grebe 2 Tachybaptus dominicus Pied-billed Grebe 1 Podilymbus podiceps Magnificent Frigatebird 1 Fregata magnificens Brown Booby 2 Sula leucogaster ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINGS ● 1643 N. Alvernon Way Ste. 109 ● Tucson ● AZ ● 85712 ● www.wingsbirds.com (866) 547 9868 Toll free US + Canada ● Tel (520) 320-9868 ● Fax (520)
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Population Density of the Endangered Cauca Guan Penelope Perspicax
    Bird Conservation International (2006) 16:299–307. ß BirdLife International 2006 doi: 10.1017/S0959270906000475 Printed in the United Kingdom Distribution and population density of the Endangered Cauca Guan Penelope perspicax GUSTAVO H. KATTAN, ADRIANA LEO´ N, GERMA´ N CORREDOR, WILLIAM BELTRA´ N and MO´ NICA PARADA Summary The original 24,900 km2 distribution of the Cauca Guan Penelope perspicax is currently reduced to less than 750 km2. In addition, forest within this range is fragmented and populations are isolated. We conducted surveys to determine the presence of the Cauca Guan at several locations within its present range, and mapped all known localities with guan records. Cauca Guan populations are confirmed to occur at only four sites, and the guan is absent from several localities with historic records. Some sites where the Cauca Guan is potentially present are highlighted. In particular, the possible existence of populations on the Pacific slope of the Andes requires confirmation, since a large habitat block is available. Population density estimates were obtained in two protected areas. In Yotoco Forest Reserve (559 ha) we estimated 8.6 guans km22. At Otu´ n-Quimbaya Flora and Fauna Sanctuary (489 ha), guans fed seasonally on leaves of Chinese ash Fraxinus chinensis, an exotic tree planted in a revegetation programme. Seasonal densities in ash plantations were over 100 guans km22, whereas in mixed forest, mean density was 41.6 birds km22. Ash has apparently become a key resource for this population. Although these two populations are within protected areas and have relatively high densities, they are small and isolated and require continued monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Wind Energy Facilities on Grouse: a Systematic Review
    Journal of Ornithology (2020) 161:1–15 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-019-01696-1 REVIEW The impact of wind energy facilities on grouse: a systematic review Joy Coppes1 · Veronika Braunisch1,2 · Kurt Bollmann3 · Ilse Storch4 · Pierre Mollet5 · Veronika Grünschachner‑Berger6,7 · Julia Taubmann1,4 · Rudi Suchant1 · Ursula Nopp‑Mayr8 Received: 17 January 2019 / Revised: 1 July 2019 / Accepted: 18 July 2019 / Published online: 1 August 2019 © Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2019 Abstract There is increasing concern about the impact of the current boom in wind energy facilities (WEF) and associated infra- structure on wildlife. However, the direct and indirect efects of these facilities on the mortality, occurrence and behaviour of rare and threatened species are poorly understood. We conducted a literature review to examine the potential impacts of WEF on grouse species. We studied whether grouse (1) collide with wind turbines, (2) show behavioural responses in relation to wind turbine developments, and (3) if there are documented efects of WEF on their population sizes or dynam- ics. Our review is based on 35 sources, including peer-reviewed articles as well as grey literature. Efects of wind turbine facilities on grouse have been studied for eight species. Five grouse species have been found to collide with wind turbines, in particular with the towers. Fifteen studies reported behavioural responses in relation to wind turbine facilities in grouse (seven species), including spatial avoidance, displacement of lekking or nesting sites, or the time invested in breeding vs. non-breeding behaviour. Grouse were afected at up to distances of 500 m by WEF infrastructure, with indications of efects also at bigger distances.
    [Show full text]
  • Oni1,2 ∙ Juan Aguirre2
    (2018) 29: 11–18 NESTING ECOLOGY OF THE ENDANGERED CHILEAN WOODSTAR (EULIDIA YARRELLII) Cristián F. Estades1,2 ∙ Ilenia Lazzoni1,2 ∙ Juan Aguirre2 1 Laboratorio de Ecología de Vida Silvestre, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Conservación de la Naturaleza, Universidad de Chile, Av. Santa Rosa 11315, La Pintana, Santiago, Chile. 2 AvesChile (Chilean Ornithologists' Union), Santiago, Chile. E-mail: Cristián F. Estades∙[email protected] Abstract ∙ The Chilean Woodstar (Eulidia yarrellii) is a critically endangered hummingbird of the Atacama desert in northern Chile, with a population estimate of around 320 individuals in 2017. To generate useful information for the design of population-recovery actions, we conducted a study of the nesting ecology of the species between 2006 and 2008. Our specific goals were to provide a quantitative descrip- tion of the species breeding habitat, to describe the basic breeding biology of the species, and to assess the current levels of nesting success. Most of our work was conducted in the valleys of Azapa and Vitor, two of the three last valleys where the species is known to persist. Alt- hough we recorded some juveniles in Azapa, we only observed the species nesting in one site in Chaca (Vitor valley), in a small (1.4 ha) olive grove where 13–20 simultaneous nests were found during the studied breeding seasons. Nesting occurs in September–October, and its tim- ing is apparently synchronized with the flowering of chañar (Geoffroea decorticans). The species has a particularly long breeding period with an average of 48 days (17 d for the egg stage, 31 d for the nestling stage).
    [Show full text]
  • Ficus Spp.) in a Tropical Cloud Forest: Evaluation of a Potential Keystone Resource
    Journal of Tropical Ecology (2013) 29:401–407. © Cambridge University Press 2013 doi:10.1017/S0266467413000461 Phenology, abundance and consumers of figs (Ficus spp.) in a tropical cloud forest: evaluation of a potential keystone resource Gustavo H. Kattan∗,†,1 and Leonor A. Valenzuela∗,‡ ∗ Fundacion´ EcoAndina, Carrera 2 A Oeste No. 12-111, Cali, Colombia † Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Matematicas,´ Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali, Avenida Canasgordas˜ No. 118-250, Cali, Colombia ‡ Departamento de Ecolog´ıa, Pontificia Universidad Catolica´ de Chile and Instituto de Ecolog´ıa y Biodiversidad (IEB), Santiago, Chile (Received 21 January 2013; revised 21 June 2013; accepted 22 June 2013; first published online 26 July 2013) Abstract: Fig trees (Ficus spp) produce fruit year-round and figs are consumed by a large proportion of frugivores throughout the tropics. Figs are potential keystone resources that sustain frugivore communities during periods of scarcity, but studies have produced contradictory results. Over 1 y we monitored the phenology of 206 trees of five Ficus species in a Colombian cloud forest, to test whether figs produced fruit during periods of low overall fruit availability. We also measured fig tree densities in 18 0.5-ha plots and made 190 h of observations at 24 trees of three species to determine whether figs were abundant and consumed by a large proportion of the local frugivores. The five species produced fruit year-round but fig availability varied monthly by orders of magnitude. Fig trees reached comparatively high densities of 1–5 trees ha−1 and were consumed by 36 bird species (60% of the local frugivore assemblage) and three mammal species.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference File
    References added since publication of 2007 CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses Abadie, K. B., J. Pérez Z., and M. Valverde. 2006. Primer reporte de colonias del Martín Peruano Progne murphyi. Cotinga 24:99-101. Ackerman, J. T., J. Y. Takekawa, J. D. Bluso, J. L. Yee, and C. A. Eagles-Smith. 2008. Gender identification of Caspian Terns using external morphology and discriminant function analysis. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120:378-383. Alarcos, S., C. de la Cruz, E. Solís, J. Valencia, and M. J. García-Baquero. 2007. Sex determination of Iberian Azure-winged Magpies Cyanopica cyanus cooki by discriminant analysis of external measurements. Ringing & Migration 23:211-216. Albayrak, T., A. Besnard, and A. Erdoğan. 2011. Morphometric variation and population relationships of Krüeper’s Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) in Turkey. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 123:734-740. Aleixo, A., C. E. B. Portes, A. Whittaker, J. D. Weckstein, L. Pedreira Gonzaga, K. J. Zimmer, C. C. Ribas, and J. M. Bates. 2013. Molecular systematics and taxonomic revision of the Curve-billed Scythebill complex (Campylorhamphus procurvoides: Dendrocolaptidae), with description of a new species from western Amazonian Brazil. Pp. 253-257, In: del Hoyo, J., A Elliott, J. Sargatal, and D.A. Christie (eds). Handbook of the birds of the world. Special volume: new species and global index. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain. Volume 1. Alfano, A. 2014. Pygmy Nightjar (Nyctopolus hirundinaeus). Neotropical Birds Online (T.S. Schulenberg, ed.). Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. Alvarenga, H. M. F., E. Höfling, and L. F. Silveira. 2002. Notharchus swainsoni (Gray, 1846) é uma espécie válida.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Occurrence of Hybrids of Castanopsis Cuspidata and C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kanazawa University Repository for Academic Resources Patterns of occurrence of hybrids of Castanopsis cuspidata and C. sieboldii in the IBP Minamata Special Research Area , Kumamoto Prefecture , Japan 著者 Kobayashi Satoshi, Hiroki Shozo journal or 植物地理・分類研究 = The journal of publication title phytogeography and toxonomy volume 51 number 1 page range 63-67 year 2003-06-25 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2297/48538 Journal of Phytogeography and Taxonomy 51 : 63-67, 2003 !The Society for the Study of Phytogeography and Taxonomy 2003 Satoshi Kobayashi and Shozo Hiroki : Patterns of occurrence of hybrids of Castanopsis cuspidata and C. sieboldii in the IBP Minamata Special Research Area , Kumamoto Prefecture , Japan Graduate School of Human Informatics, Nagoya University, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya 464―8601, Japan Castanopsis cuspidata(Thunb.)Schottky and However, it is difficult to identify the hybrids by C. sieboldii(Makino)Hatus. ex T. Yamaz. et nut morphology alone, because the nut shapes of Mashiba are dominant components of the ever- the 2 species are variable and can overlap with green broad-leaved forests of southwestern Ja- each other. Kobayashi et al.(1998)showed that pan, including parts of Honshu, Kyushu and hybrids have a chimeric structure of both 1 and Shikoku but excluding the Ryukyu Islands(Hat- 2 epidermal layers within a leaf. These morpho- tori and Nakanishi 1983).Although these 2 Cas- logical differences among C. cuspidata, C. sie- tanopsis species are both climax species, it is boldii and their hybrid can be confirmed by ge- very difficult to distinguish them because of the netic differences in nuclear species-specific existence of an intermediate type(hybrid).
    [Show full text]
  • Colombia Andean Endemics II 21St October to 7Th November 2017 (18 Days)
    Colombia Andean Endemics II 21st October to 7th November 2017 (18 Days) Flame-winged Parakeet by Clayton Burne Colombia has more species of birds than any other country; a staggering 1900 species are to be found within the confines of this incredible nation, of which at least 85 are endemic. This huge diversity of species results from the equally diverse range of habitats: three Andean Cordilleras (Western, Central and Eastern Andes), two inter-Andean valleys (the Cauca and Magdalena Valleys), the lowlands RBL Colombia Andean Endemics Itinerary 2 forests of the Amazon and Orinoco regions, the isolated snow-capped Santa Marta Mountains, the Pacific and Caribbean coasts, deserts and lakes, and the rich wet forests of the Chocó all help to make it one of the most exciting countries to bird on earth! Despite the impressive number of species and endemics, Colombia is also among the least visited birding destination in South America. There can be little doubt that this is a direct result of the turbulent political and social climate; yet while Colombia has for a long time been considered unsafe to visit, there are many parts of the country that are now safe for tourists. Our tour will focus on the large number of endemics the country has to offer; firstly in the Andean region, and then with an extension to the Guajira desert and the impressive Santa Marta Mountains on the northern coast. THE TOUR AT A GLANCE… THE ITINERARY Day 1 Arrival in Bogota Day 2 PNN Chingaza & Guasca Day 3 La Florida, Laguna Tabacal & Jardin Encantado to Mariquita Day
    [Show full text]
  • Listing Five Foreign Bird Species in Colombia and Ecuador, South America, As Endangered Throughout Their Range; Final Rule
    Vol. 78 Tuesday, No. 209 October 29, 2013 Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing Five Foreign Bird Species in Colombia and Ecuador, South America, as Endangered Throughout Their Range; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:44 Oct 28, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\29OCR4.SGM 29OCR4 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES4 64692 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR endangered or threatened we are proposed for these five foreign bird required to publish in the Federal species as endangered, following careful Fish and Wildlife Service Register a proposed rule to list the consideration of all comments we species and, within 1 year of received during the public comment 50 CFR Part 17 publication of the proposed rule, a final periods. rule to add the species to the Lists of [Docket No. FWS–R9–IA–2009–12; III. Costs and Benefits 4500030115] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. On July 7, 2009, we We have not analyzed the costs or RIN 1018–AV75 published a proposed rule in which we benefits of this rulemaking action determined that the blue-billed because the Act precludes consideration Endangered and Threatened Wildlife curassow, brown-banded antpitta, Cauca of such impacts on listing and delisting and Plants; Listing Five Foreign Bird guan, gorgeted wood-quail, and determinations. Instead, listing and Species in Colombia and Ecuador, Esmeraldas woodstar currently face delisting decisions are based solely on South America, as Endangered numerous threats and warrant listing the best scientific and commercial Throughout Their Range under the Act as endangered species (74 information available regarding the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, FR 32308).
    [Show full text]
  • Can Urban Conservation Save a Critically Endangered Bird?
    BIRDCONSERVATION The Magazine of American Bird Conservancy FALL 2017 BIRD’S EYE VIEW ABC’s New President: ABC is the Western Hemisphere’s bird conservation Putting Hope Into Action specialist—the only organization with a single and steadfast t is an enormous honor for me to take on the species are among the most heavily impacted. ABC commitment to achieving conservation results for native role of ABC President following in the footsteps will work with partners through BirdScapes and other Fall 2017 Iof George Fenwick. As we worked together for conservation tools to ensure that these birds and wild birds and their habitats more than 20 years, George and I collaborated with their habitats are adequately conserved. And we will throughout the Americas. the staff to develop American remain at the forefront to find BIRDCONSERVATION Bird Conservancy’s conservation both political and technological strategy. It has produced solutions to the main threats to A copy of the current financial statement and registration filed by the organization demonstrable results year after birds. may be obtained by contacting: ABC, P.O. 10 Airspace May Be the Final year, and I believe ABC is firmly Box 249, The Plains, VA 20198. 540-253- 5780, or by contacting the following state We will continue to conduct Ecological Frontier on the right track. agencies: our work with authenticity, Florida: Division of Consumer Services, I love birds and birding, and I want transparency, and dignity; we will toll-free number within the state: my children, and eventually their approach our partners thoughtfully 800-435-7352. 14 Can Urban Conservation children, to have the opportunity and with respect, even if we Maryland: For the cost of copies and postage: Office of the Secretary of State, Save a Rare Bird? to enjoy birds as I have.
    [Show full text]
  • Update of the Situation of the Cantabrian Capercaillie Tetrao Urogallus Cantabricus: an Ongoing Decline Maria José Bañuelos & Mario Quevedo
    Grouse News 25 Newsletter of Grouse Specialist Group Update of the situation of the Cantabrian capercaillie Tetrao urogallus cantabricus: an ongoing decline Maria José Bañuelos & Mario Quevedo In a previous number of Grouse News (Bañuelos et al. 2004) we reported the drastic decline that Cantabrian capercaillie Tetrao urogallus cantabricus had apparently suffered in two decades, from the early 1980’s to 2000 - 2001. Based on extensive evaluation of lek occupancy, about 50% of the display areas had been deserted, and the number of remaining cocks was roughly estimated at 300. Accordingly, Cantabrian capercaillie was listed as endangered in Spain, and became the only subspecies of capercaillie qualifying as endangered according to IUCN criteria (Storch et al. 2006). This capercaillie population occupies a very southerly range for a tetraonid (Quevedo et al. 2006a), and has recently been identified as an evolutionary significant unit because of its unique ecological and genetic characteristics (Rodríguez- Muñoz et al. 2007). Between 2005 and 2007 a new extensive lek survey was performed in the northern watershed of the range (Asturias), over a territory that comprises more than 50% of the population. Almost all known display areas (N=364) were repeatedly surveyed during the lekking season (April-May). Surveys were performed during the day, looking for signs such as feathers, fresh droppings or footprints, so that results were mainly presence-absence data. Occupancy surveys during the day were mostly chosen over more traditional lek counts at dawn to minimize disturbances, but also because the previous survey (2000/2001) showed that less than 10% of the occupied sites had more than one cock.
    [Show full text]
  • Neblina Reserve Facts for Rainforest Concern
    Rainforest Concern: Neblina Reserve facts for NatureNature Travels 1.1.1. THE NEBLINA RESERVE Facts and figures Rainforest Concern’s Neblina Reserve is a cloud forest in North West Ecuador, and forms part of the Southern phase of the Chocó Andean corridor project The Neblina Reserve is currently around 2,200 hectares The region is predominantly tropical montane cloud forest, and has exceptional biodiversity Before project intervention the forest was depleting at a rate of 1.5% per year Rainforest Concern has been working on this project since 1993. The ultimate goal of the Chocó Andean corridor project is to form a corridor of continuous protected forest from Mindo Reserve, close to the capital Quito in the south, to the Awa Reserve on the Colombian border in the north. The southern phase of this project is located between two of the Global Biodiversity hotspots : the Chocó-Darien and Tropical Andes , and will link the last vulnerable forests between the Cotacachi-Cayapas Reserve to the North, and the Maquipucuna, Mindo and Pululahua reserves to the South. Species Among the endemic species found in the area are the Andean (spectacled) bear, puma and Cock of the Rock. A recent discovery, in forest close to Neblina, is the Olinguito. This small, nocturnal mammal was only discovered in 2013. According to DECOIN, no less than 28 species of mammals and birds are seriously threatened - including spectacled bears, pumas, ocelots, northern tiger cat and two other species of cats, two species of monkeys, a very rare species of wild dog, mountain tapirs, and a river otter.
    [Show full text]