Victoriawatson2021.Pdf (6.532Mb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Victoriawatson2021.Pdf (6.532Mb) PALEOLIMNOLOGY AS A QUANTITATIVE INDICATOR OF ECOSYSTEM VULNERABILITY by Victoria Watson Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia July 2021 © Copyright by Victoria Watson, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. iv LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................. v ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED .............................................................................. viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ ix CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Overview of the problem to be addressed ...................................................................................... 3 1.1.2 Primary data research purpose and objectives ............................................................................... 4 1.2 LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................................................................. 5 1.2.1 Sable Island National Park Reserve ............................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Paleolimnology ............................................................................................................................ 10 1.2.3 Ecological vulnerability ............................................................................................................... 14 1.3 RESEARCH SITES ................................................................................................................... 16 1.3.1 Sable Island National Park Reserve ............................................................................................. 16 1.3.2 Landscape .................................................................................................................................... 17 1.3.3 Naturalized horses ........................................................................................................................ 18 1.3.3 Pond PD67 ................................................................................................................................... 19 1.3.4 Pond PD03 ................................................................................................................................... 20 1.4 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 21 CHAPTER 2: THE VALUE OF PALEOLIMNOLOGY IN RECONSTRUCTING AND MANAGING ECOSYSTEM VULNERABILITY: A SYSTEMATIC MAP ................... 30 2.1 STATEMENT OF STUDENT CONTRIBUTIONS .......................................................................... 30 2.2 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................. 30 2.3 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 31 2.4 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 35 2.4.1 Search strategy ............................................................................................................................. 35 2.4.2 Inclusion criteria .......................................................................................................................... 36 2.4.3 Article selection process .............................................................................................................. 37 2.4.4 Analysis ........................................................................................................................................ 37 2.5 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 38 2.5.1 To what extent is capacity covered in the paleolimnology and vulnerability literature? ............ 40 2.5.2 To what extent is adaptation covered in the paleolimnology and vulnerability literature? ......... 40 2.6 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................... 43 2.6.1 The role of paleolimnology in vulnerability assessment ............................................................. 45 2.6.2 Ecological integrity ...................................................................................................................... 48 2.6.3 Reference conditions and ecosystem monitoring ......................................................................... 49 2.6.4 Establishing management goals ................................................................................................... 52 2.6.5 Creating targets for ecosystem restoration ................................................................................... 54 2.7 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 56 2.8 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 58 ii CHAPTER 3: A PALEOLIMNOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE OF ECOLOGICAL VULNERABILITY AND MANAGEMENT OF FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS OF SABLE ISLAND NATIONAL PARK RESERVE, CANADA ........................................ 70 3.1 STATEMENT OF STUDENT CONTRIBUTION ............................................................................ 70 3.2 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................. 70 3.3 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 71 3.4 STUDY SITE ........................................................................................................................... 74 3.5 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 76 3.5.1 Field sampling .............................................................................................................................. 76 3.5.2 Laboratory analysis ...................................................................................................................... 77 3.5.3 Statistical and numerical methods ............................................................................................... 78 3.6 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 79 3.6.1 Chronology .................................................................................................................................. 79 3.6.2 Chironomid assemblages ............................................................................................................. 80 3.6.3 Water quality ................................................................................................................................ 86 3.7 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................... 87 3.7.1 Ecosystem changes ...................................................................................................................... 88 3.7.2 Causes of ecosystem stress .......................................................................................................... 90 3.7.2 Vulnerability and implications for management .......................................................................... 92 3.8 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 94 3.9 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 97 CHAPTER 4: CONCLUSION ........................................................................................ 107 4.1 STATEMENT OF STUDENT CONTRIBUTION .......................................................................... 107 4.2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 107 4.3 THE VALUE OF PALEOLIMNOLOGY IN RECONSTRUCTING AND MANAGING ECOSYSTEM VULNERABILITY: KEY INSIGHTS .............................................................................................. 107 4.4 A PALEOLIMNOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE OF ECOLOGICAL VULNERABILITY OF LAKES IN SABLE ISLAND NATIONAL PARK RESERVE, CANADA: KEY INSIGHTS ..................................... 108 4.5 FINAL THOUGHTS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS ..................................................................... 110 4.6 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 113 REFERENCE ..................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019
    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts
    Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts September 15, 2013 This report is the result of several years of field data collection, analyses and IBI development, and consideration of the opportunities for wetland program and policy development in relation to IBIs and CAPS Index of Ecological Integrity (IEI). Contributors include: University of Massachusetts Amherst Kevin McGarigal, Ethan Plunkett, Joanna Grand, Brad Compton, Theresa Portante, Kasey Rolih, and Scott Jackson Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Jan Smith, Marc Carullo, and Adrienne Pappal Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Lisa Rhodes, Lealdon Langley, and Michael Stroman Empirically Derived Indices of Biotic Integrity for Forested Wetlands, Coastal Salt Marshes and Wadable Freshwater Streams in Massachusetts Abstract The purpose of this study was to develop a fully empirically-based method for developing Indices of Biotic Integrity (IBIs) that does not rely on expert opinion or the arbitrary designation of reference sites and pilot its application in forested wetlands, coastal salt marshes and wadable freshwater streams in Massachusetts. The method we developed involves: 1) using a suite of regression models to estimate the abundance of each taxon across a gradient of stressor levels, 2) using statistical calibration based on the fitted regression models and maximum likelihood methods to predict the value of the stressor metric based on the abundance of the taxon at each site, 3) selecting taxa in a forward stepwise procedure that conditionally improves the concordance between the observed stressor value and the predicted value the most and a stopping rule for selecting taxa based on a conditional alpha derived from comparison to pseudotaxa data, and 4) comparing the coefficient of concordance for the final IBI to the expected distribution derived from randomly permuted data.
    [Show full text]
  • University Micrcsilms International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
    [Show full text]
  • PROCEEDINGS of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY of SCIENCE Volume 98 2018
    PROCEEDINGS of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Volume 98 2018 EDITOR: Mostafa Elshahed Production Editor: Tammy Austin Business Manager: T. David Bass The Official Organ of the OKLAHOMA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Which was established in 1909 for the purpose of stimulating scientific research; to promote fraternal relationships among those engaged in scientific work in Oklahoma; to diffuse among the citizens of the State a knowledge of the various departments of science; and to investigate and make known the material, educational, and other resources of the State. Affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Publication Date: January 2019 ii POLICIES OF THE PROCEEDINGS The Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science contains papers on topics of interest to scientists. The goal is to publish clear communications of scientific findings and of matters of general concern for scientists in Oklahoma, and to serve as a creative outlet for other scientific contributions by scientists. ©2018 Oklahoma Academy of Science The Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy Base and/or other appropriate repository. of Science contains reports that describe the Information necessary for retrieval of the results of original scientific investigation data from the repository will be specified in (including social science). Papers are received a reference in the paper. with the understanding that they have not been published previously or submitted for 4. Manuscripts that report research involving publication elsewhere. The papers should be human subjects or the use of materials of significant scientific quality, intelligible to a from human organs must be supported by broad scientific audience, and should represent a copy of the document authorizing the research conducted in accordance with accepted research and signed by the appropriate procedures and scientific ethics (proper subject official(s) of the institution where the work treatment and honesty).
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014
    United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington, DC EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014 2013‐2014 National Rivers & Streams Assessment Laboratory Operations Manual Version 1.3, May 2014 Page ii of 224 NOTICE The intention of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 is to provide a comprehensive “State of Flowing Waters” assessment for rivers and streams across the United States. The complete documentation of overall project management, design, methods, quality assurance, and standards is contained in five companion documents: National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Quality Assurance Project Plan EPA‐841‐B‐12‐007 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Site Evaluation Guidelines EPA‐841‐B‐12‐008 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐ 12‐009a National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐12‐ 009b National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Laboratory Operations Manual EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 Addendum to the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable & Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manuals This document (Laboratory Operations Manual) contains information on the methods for analyses of the samples to be collected during the project, quality assurance objectives, sample handling, and data reporting. These methods are based on the guidelines developed and followed in the Western Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (Peck et al. 2003). Methods described in this document are to be used specifically in work relating to the NRSA 2013‐2014.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS N WATER POLLUT1 on April 23
    BIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS N WATER POLLUT1 ON Transactions of a Seminar on Biological Problems in Water Pollution held at the Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center Cincinnati, Ohio April 23 - 27, 1956 Compiled and Edited by CLARENCE M. TARZWELL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Public Health Service Bureau of State Services Division of Sanitary Engineering Services Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center 1957 PREFACE During the past few years a number of State Health Departments and Water Pollution Control Boards have initiated or expanded investigations in the field of sanitary biology. Universities and other research organizations are showing increased interest in biological problems connected with the detection and abatement of stream pollution. A few universities are now giving courses directed toward the training of sanitary biologists, and several are considering the establishment of curricula for the training of aquatic biologists for work in the water works, sewage treatment, and stream pollution fields. In recent years industries have added sanitary biologists to their staffs, and several aquatic biologists have undertaken consultant activities. Biologists engaged in pollution investigations and research often work alone and are somewhat isolated. For some time, therefore, there had been recognized a need for a conference of those engaged in the study of biological problems in water pollution control, to acquaint them with current developments and new methods of approach, and to enable them to become acquainted with other workers in the field. The first such gathering was held as a seminar at the Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center, April 23 - 27, 1956. The meeting was well attended, as ninety persons were registered at the Seminar.
    [Show full text]
  • Recherches Sur Les Chironomides (Diptera) Lacus­ Tres Du Massif De Néouvielle (Hautes-Pyrénées)
    ANNALES DE LIMNOLOGIE, t. 7, fasc. 3, 1971, p. 335-414 RECHERCHES SUR LES CHIRONOMLDECHIRONOMDJES [DIPTERA] LACUSTRES DU MASSIF DE NÉOUVIELLE (HAUTES-PYRÉNÉES) DEUXIÈME PARTIE COMMUNAUTÉS ET PRODUCTION par H. LAVILLE1 SOMMAIRE IV. Les communautés 337 1. — Méthode de détermination des groupements 337 2. — Groupements de stations 340 2.1. — Différents groupements 340 2.2. — Affinités entre les groupements 342 3. — Groupements d'espèces 343 4. — Analyse des groupements 347 4.1. — Groupement I 351 4.1.1. Composantes écologiques 351 4.1.2. Composantes spécifiques 352 4.2. — Groupement II 353 4.2.1. Composantes écologiques 354 4.2.2. Composantes spécifiques 354 4.3. — Groupement III' 355 4.3.1. Composantes écologiques 355 4.3.2. Composantes spécifiques 356 4.4. — Groupement IV 357 4.4.1. Composantes écologiques 357 4.4.2. Composantes spécifiques 357 4.5. — Remarques 358 1. Ce mémoire constitue la deuxième partie d'une Thèse présentée devant l'Université Paul-Sabatier de Toulouse en vue de l'obtention du Doctorat es Sciences naturelles. Laboratoire d'Hydrobiologie, Université Paul-Sabatier, 118, route de Narbonne, 31 - Toulouse. Article available at http://www.limnology-journal.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/limn/1971005 336 H. LAVILLE (162) 5. — Répartition des Tanytarsus 359 5.1. — Les lacs du vallon d'Estibère 359 5.2. — Les lacs du vallon de Port-Bielh 361 5.3. — Discussion 361 6. — Résumé et conclusions 362 V. Etude de la production du lac de Port-Bielh 367 1. — Méthodes 368 2. — Composition qualitative et quantitative du macroben­ thos 369 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Catálogo De Los Diptera De España, Portugal Y Andorra (Insecta) Coordinador: Miguel Carles-Tolrá Hjorth-Andersen Edita: Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (SEA)
    MONOGRAFÍAS S.E.A. — vol. 8 Primera Edición: Zaragoza, 31 Diciembre, 2002. Título: Catálogo de los Diptera de España, Portugal y Andorra (Insecta) Coordinador: Miguel Carles-Tolrá Hjorth-Andersen Edita: Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (SEA). Avda. Radio Juventud, 37 50012 – Zaragoza (España) Director de publicaciones: A. Melic [email protected] http://entomologia.rediris.es/sea Maquetación y Diseño: A. Melic Portada: Díptero imaginario: Cabeza (Nematocera): Tipula maxima Poda; tórax y alas (Orthorrhapha): Rhagio scolopaceus (Linnaeus); abdomen (Cyclorrhapha): Cylindromyia brassicaria (Fabricius); patas anteriores (Nematocera): Bibio marci (Linnaeus); patas medias (Orthorrhapha): Asilus crabroniformis Linnaeus; patas posteriores (Cyclorrhapha): Micropeza corrigiolata (Linnaeus). Imprime: Gorfi, S.A. c/.Menéndez Pelayo, 4 50009 – Zaragoza (España) I.S.B.N.: 84 – 932807– 0 – 4 Depósito Legal: Z – 1789 – 94 © Los autores (por la obra) © SEA (por la edición). Queda prohibida la reproducción total o parcial del presente volumen, o de cualquiera de sus partes, por cualquier medio, sin el previo y expreso consentimiento por escrito de los autores y editora. Publicación gratuita para socios SEA (ejercicio 2002). Precio de venta al público: 18 euros (IVA incluido). Gastos de envío no incluidos. Solicitudes: SEA. Catálogo de los Diptera de España, Portugal y Andorra (Insecta) Miguel Carles-Tolrá Hjorth-Andersen (coordinador) MONOGRAFÍAS SEA, vol. 8 ZARAGOZA, 2002 a m INDICE DE MATERIAS / ÍNDICE DE CONTEÚDOS / INDEX OF MATTERS Introducción / Introdução
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Impairment Criteria for Flowing Waters in New York State
    ~- . l Division of Water BIOLOGICAL IMPAIRMENT CRITERIA FOR FLOWING WATERS i IN NEW YORK STATE September 1990 .. New York State/Department of Environmental Conservation BIOLOGICAL IMPAIRMENT CRITERIA FOR FLOWING WATERS IN NEW YORK STATE September 21, 1990 Robert W. Bode Margaret A. Novak Lawrence E. Abele Stream Biomonitoring unit Bureau of Monitoring and Assessment Division of Water NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 50 Wolf Road Albany, New York 12233 -3503 CONTENTS I. SU MMARY ................................ ........................ 1 I I. DEFINITIONS ................................ ................... 2 III. INTRODUCTION ................................ ............. 3 A. RATIONALE B. BENEFITS C. SITE-SPECIFIC VS. REGIONAL APPROACH D. POSSIBLE AREAS OF CONCERN IV. SPECIFICATIONS OF CRITERIA ............................... 7 A. SAMPLING METHODS B. INDEX VALUES C. OUTLINE OF PROCEDURES V. CHRONOLOGY/ DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA ...................... 12 A. PRELIMINARY CRITERIA ASSIGNED B. PRELIMINARY CRITERIA TESTED C. PRELIMINARY CRITERIA MODIFIED VI. LITERATURE CITED ................................ ........ 61 APPENDIX I. METHODS FOR APPLICATION OF CRITERIA ............. 62 A. DETERMINATION OF SAMPLING METHOD B. SELECTION OF SAMPLING SITES C. HABITAT COMPARABILITY CRITERIA D. SAMPLING METHODS E. CALCULATION OF HILSENHOFF BIOTIC INDEX F. CALCULATION OF PERCENT MODEL AFFINITY G. PERFORMING THE STUDENT'S T-TEST H. CALCULATING PERCENT SIMILARITY APPENDIX II. REQUIRED LEVEL OF TAXONOMY ..................... 76 APPE NDIX III. SUGGESTED
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Freshwater Species Richness, Endemism, and Vulnerability in California
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Patterns of Freshwater Species Richness, Endemism, and Vulnerability in California Jeanette K. Howard1☯*, Kirk R. Klausmeyer1☯, Kurt A. Fesenmyer2☯, Joseph Furnish3, Thomas Gardali4, Ted Grantham5, Jacob V. E. Katz5, Sarah Kupferberg6, Patrick McIntyre7, Peter B. Moyle5, Peter R. Ode8, Ryan Peek5, Rebecca M. Quiñones5, Andrew C. Rehn7, Nick Santos5, Steve Schoenig7, Larry Serpa1, Jackson D. Shedd1, Joe Slusark7, Joshua H. Viers9, Amber Wright10, Scott A. Morrison1 1 The Nature Conservancy, San Francisco, California, United States of America, 2 Trout Unlimited, Boise, Idaho, United States of America, 3 USDA Forest Service, Vallejo, California, United States of America, 4 Point Blue Conservation Science, Petaluma, California, United States of America, 5 Center for Watershed Sciences and Department of Wildlife Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America, 6 Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America, 7 Biogeographic Data Branch, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, California, United States of America, 8 Aquatic Bioassessment Laboratory, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Rancho Cordova, California, United States of America, 9 School of Engineering, University of California Merced, Merced, California, United States of America, 10 Department of Biology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America ☯ OPEN ACCESS These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] Citation: Howard JK, Klausmeyer KR, Fesenmyer KA, Furnish J, Gardali T, Grantham T, et al. (2015) Patterns of Freshwater Species Richness, Abstract Endemism, and Vulnerability in California. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0130710. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130710 The ranges and abundances of species that depend on freshwater habitats are declining Editor: Brian Gratwicke, Smithsonian's National worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Benthic Index of Stream Quality (M-BISQ) Report with Appendices
    Development and Application of the Mississippi Benthic Index of Stream Quality (M-BISQ) Prepared for: Water Quality Assessment Branch Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality 2380 Highway 80 West Jackson, Mississippi 39204 Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. 10045 Red Run Blvd., Suite 110 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117-6102 June 30, 2003 Development of Mississippi Benthic Index of Stream Quality ABSTRACT In 2001 Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality initiated development of a geographically calibrated multimetric index for the purpose of re-evaluating §303(d) listed streams found throughout the state except the Mississippi Alluvial Plain. Biological, chemical, physical, and landscape data were collected for over 450 sites during the winter index period (Jan-Mar) of 2001. Sites used for calibrating and testing indices and associated metrics were selected using quantitative landscape, physical, and chemical criteria. They were selected to represent the least-disturbed and most-disturbed conditions. Five site classes (Northwest, Black Belt, Northeast, West and East) were developed for the state based on variability of physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the streams sampled across the study region. Separate indices were developed for each of these site classes and used to evaluate the impairment status of streams found within each site class. A total of 455 streams were evaluated using the Mississippi Benthic Index of Stream Quality (M-BISQ). This report describes the steps involved in developing the M-BISQ and
    [Show full text]