The Larger Moths of Staffordshire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Larger Moths of Staffordshire The Larger Moths of Staffordshire D.W. Emley and R.G. Warren 2001 Biological Recording Scheme Publication number 16 Published by Staffordshire Ecological Record Maps were produced using DMAP and are reproduced with kind permission of Ordnance Survey. © Crown copyright NC/01/271. ISSN : 0309-2100 ISBN : 1 874414 20 3 The Larger Moths of Staffordshire D.W. Emley & R.G. Warren Richard Gordon Warren 1912 - 1999......................................................................................... 2 Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 3 Aim of the Publication ............................................................................................................... 3 Area Covered.............................................................................................................................. 3 Which are the Larger Moths?.....................................................................................................4 Finding Moths ............................................................................................................................ 4 Searching................................................................................................................................ 4 Attracting................................................................................................................................ 5 When to look .............................................................................................................................. 6 Where to find moths................................................................................................................... 7 Identifying Moths....................................................................................................................... 7 Future Recording........................................................................................................................ 8 Where to Record..................................................................................................................... 8 Rarities and Verification ........................................................................................................ 9 Submission of Records........................................................................................................ 10 Introduction to the Species Accounts....................................................................................... 10 Sources of the Records............................................................................................................. 10 List of Recorders ...................................................................................................................... 11 References ................................................................................................................................ 12 The Species Accounts .............................................................................................................. 13 Appendix 1 : Species needing confirmation .......................................................................... 124 Appendix 2 : List of plants mentioned in the text.................................................................. 125 Appendix 3 : Localities from which records were received................................................... 126 Appendix 4 : Most widespread species.................................................................................. 128 Appendix 5 : Most restricted species ..................................................................................... 129 Appendix 6 : Species no longer with us................................................................................. 129 Appendix 7 : Useful Addresses.............................................................................................. 130 Butterfly Conservation ....................................................................................................... 130 North Staffordshire Field Club........................................................................................... 130 Potteries Museum and Art Gallery..................................................................................... 130 Staffordshire Ecological Record ........................................................................................ 130 Staffordshire Invertebrate Group ....................................................................................... 130 Staffordshire Wildlife Trust ............................................................................................... 130 Index to English Names ......................................................................................................... 131 Index to Scientific Names ...................................................................................................... 137 1 Richard Gordon Warren 1912 - 1999 With the death of Richard Warren, Staffordshire has lost one of its best known and most experienced naturalists. Not only was he the leading authority and recorder of the butterflies and moths of the county, he also had a deep knowledge of its caddisflies, damselflies, dragonflies and lacewings as well as its birds and plants. He was, in fact, one of that rare breed of people - an all-round naturalist. Richard was Chairman of the Entomology Section of the North Staffordshire Field Club from 1951 until his death and was made a Life Vice President of the Club in 1987. He was a founder member of the Staffordshire Wildlife Trust and was its Treasurer for many years. He will be forever associated with two of its reserves - Loynton Moss and in particular Burnt Wood. I was fortunate to learn at the feet of the master. We travelled all over the county and spent many hours watching a blue lamp on a white sheet, often in the middle of nowhere! His dexterity with a net and enthusiasm for his beloved lepidoptera, especially the "micros" never diminished. It was a severe blow to him when his health prevented him from handling the "small fry" as he called them. He was always quick to share his knowledge and he corresponded widely with other lepidopterists throughout the county. He had country-wide connections too and was often contacted by other county recorders and national experts when new atlases etc. were being compiled. Over the years Richard built up a fine and important collection of both macro and microlepidoptera, which is now housed in the Potteries Museum and Art Gallery and is available for inspection on request. Like all naturalists Richard enjoyed finding species that were new to the county and, I suspect, dreamed of finding a species new to the British Isles. However, he went even one better than that and found something completely new and, as far as I know, unique to science - a wild hybrid between the Spring Usher and the Dotted Border Agriopis leucophaearia x marginaria. It was one of his proudest achievements. Sadly, Richard was unable to see his revision of the Larger Moths of Staffordshire in print. It has been my privilege to complete this and to see it through to publication. It is, of course, dedicated to his memory. David W Emley 2 Foreword Between 1978 and 1981 Richard published county distribution maps for all the butterflies and larger moths - the so called "macrolepidoptera". He was able to revise the maps for the butterflies in 1984 and, before he died, began a revision of the macrolepidoptera. In my capacity as the new county recorder I was asked by the Natural History Unit at the Potteries Museum to check a draft version of his manuscript. In so doing it quickly became apparent that by including information on preferred habitat, flight times of the adults and foodplants of the larvae and with some rearrangement of the text, the booklet could be of interest to a much wider audience. I also took the opportunity to re-check the records for the past twenty years in order to make the maps and accounts as up-to-date as possible. The eight colour plates illustrate the range of shapes, colours and degree of camouflage to be found in the larger moths and include some of the species more often seen by the casual observer. Acknowledgements On behalf of Richard and myself, I would like to thank all the recorders whose records have made this publication possible. We are particularly endebted to Helen Ball, Godfrey Blunt, Jon Clifton, Dave Friday, Dave Grundy, Ian Lycett, Dave McDermott, Jan Koryszko, Mark Sutton, Anna Poyser, Craig Slawson, Ken and Wendy Wheatley all of whom responded to a last-minute request for data. Personally I would like to thank Keith Bloor at the Potteries Museum and Art Gallery for the opportunity to work on this publication, Richard Tribbeck for the photograph of Richard Warren, Andy Lawrence for producing the cover and Graham Lees, Phil Lane, Mick and Joy Green for commenting on the script. I particularly thank Staffordshire Wildlife Trust, Potteries Museum and Art Gallery, Butterfly Conservation and the North Staffordshire Field Club whose generosity made this publication possible. Finally I would like to thank my wife Sue for reading through and commenting on the script and for her forbearance over the past year when I spent far too long at the computer. Aim of the Publication The aim of this publication is to detail the status
Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    732 _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 7, No. 2, June 2012__________ STRUCTURE OF LEPIDOPTEROCENOSES ON OAKS QUERCUS DALECHAMPII AND Q. CERRIS IN CENTRAL EUROPE AND ESTIMATION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT SPECIES Miroslav Kulfan* * Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina B-1, SK-84215 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. E-mail: [email protected] [Kulfan, M. 2012. Structure of lepidopterocenoses on oaks Quercus dalechampii and Q. cerris in Central Europe and estimation of the most important species. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 7 (2): 732-741] ABSTRACT: On the basis of lepidopterous larvae a total of 96 species on Quercus dalechampii and 58 species on Q. cerris were recorded in 10 study plots of Malé Karpaty and Trnavská pahorkatina hills. The families Geometridae, Noctuidae and Tortricidae encompassed the highest number of found species. The most recorded species belonged to the trophic group of generalists. On the basis of total abundance of lepidopterous larvae found on Q. dalechampii from all the study plots the most abundant species was evidently Operophtera brumata. The most abundant species on Q. cerris was Cyclophora ruficiliaria. Based on estimated oak leaf area consumed by a larva it is shown that Lymantria dispar was the most important leaf-chewing species of both Q. dalechampii and Q. cerris. KEY WORDS: Slovakia, Quercus dalechampii, Q. cerris, the most important species. About 300 Lepidoptera species are known to damage the assimilation tissue of oaks in Central Europe (Patočka, 1954, 1980; Patočka et al.1999; Reiprich, 2001). Lepidoptera larvae are shown to be the most important group of oak defoliators (Patočka et al., 1962, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis.Pdf (3.979Mb)
    FACULTY OF BIOSCIENCES, FISHERIES AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF ARCTIC AND MARINE BIOLOGY Cyclically outbreaking geometrid moths in sub-arctic mountain birch forest: the organization and impacts of their interactions with animal communities — Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor – October 2014 Cyclically outbreaking geometrid moths in sub-arctic mountain birch forest: the organization and impacts of their interactions with animal communities Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor University of Tromsø – The arctic university of Norway Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics Department of Arctic and Marine Biology Autumn 2014 1 Dedicated to everyone who has helped me along the way 2 Supervisors Professor Rolf Anker Ims1 Senior researcher Jane Uhd Jepsen2 1 Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway 2 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway Cover photos Front cover – Larvae of Epirrita autumnata feeding on mountain birch during a moth outbreak in northern Norway. Photo: Moritz Klinghardt Study I – Portrait of Agrypon flaveolatum. One of the most important larval parasitoid species in study I. Photo: Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad Study II – Carcass of an Operophtera brumata larva, standing over the cocoon of its killer, the parasitoid group Protapanteles anchisiades/P. immunis/Cotesia salebrosa. Photo: Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad Study III – Larva of the parasitoid group Phobocampe sp./Sinophorus crassifemur emerging from Agriopis aurantiaria host larva. Photo: Tino Schott Study IV – An area of healthy mountain birch forest, representative for the undamaged sampling sites in study IV and V. Photo: Jakob Iglhaut Study V – An area of mountain birch forest that has been heavily damaged by a moth outbreak, representative for the damaged sampling sites in study IV and V.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to Knowledge of the Geometrid Fauna of Bulgaria and Greece, with Four Species New for the Greek Fauna (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) (Plate 12)
    Esperiana Band 18: 221- 224 Bad Staffelstein; Schwanfeld, 02. Dezember 2013 ISBN 978-3-938249-04-8 Contributions to knowledge of the geometrid fauna of Bulgaria and Greece, with four species new for the Greek fauna (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) (plate 12) Balázs TÓTH, János BABICS & Balázs BENEDEK Abstract During a tour led by the authors to Bulgaria and Greece in March, 2013, a total of 19 geometrid species were observed at five localities. Biston achyra WEHRLI, 1936, Agriopis marginaria (FABRICIUS, 1776), A. leucophaearia ([DENIS & SCHIffERMÜLLER], 1775) and Erannis ankeraria (STAUDINGER, 1861) were found for the first time in Greece. An entirely new habitat type is included to the biotope range of E. ankeraria, arousing the possibility of this species being widespread in the Mediterranean countries. The authors hope that these observations will encourage attention to the exploration of the populations, thereby contributing to the more efficient protection of this species. Checklists are given to each collecting events. Key words: Biston, Agriopis, Erannis, Bulgaria, Greece, new data, oak woodland, macchia-scrub, soil types Introduction Biston achyra WEHRLI, 1936 was described from Asia Minor and subsequently found in Ukraine (KOSTJUK, 1990), the Levant (KOSTJUK, 1991) and Russia (SINEV, 2008). This species can be distinguished from its relative B. strataria (HUFNAGEL, 1767) by its considerably smaller size, more elongated forewing, and the presence of discal spot on the hindwing. Agriopis marginaria (FABRICIUS, 1776) and A. leucophaearia ([DENIS & SCHIFFERMÜLLER], 1775) are both frequent and widespread in Europe. The former species is distributed from the Iberian Peninsula to the Urals and the Caucasus Mts., and is also present in Asia Minor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods
    The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods A report prepared for The Woodland Trust The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods Andrew Carr, Dr Matt Zeale & Professor Gareth Jones School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ Report prepared for The Woodland Trust October 2016 Acknowledgements Thanks to: Dave Rickwood of the Woodland Trust for his central role and continued support throughout this project; Dr Andrew Weatherall of the University of Cumbria; Simon Lee of Natural England and James Mason of the Woodland Trust for helpful advice; Dr Beth Clare of Queen Mary University of London for support with molecular work; the many Woodland Trust volunteers and assistants that provided their time to the project. We would particularly like to thank Tom ‘the tracker’ Williams and Mike ‘the trapper’ Treble for dedicating so much of their time. We thank the Woodland Trust, Natural England and the Heritage Lottery Fund for funding this research. We also appreciate assistance from the local landowners who provided access to land. i Contents Acknowledgements i Contents ii List of figures and tables iii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 The Barbastelle in Bovey Valley Woods 2 1.3 Objectives 2 2 Methods 2 2.1 Study area 2 2.2 Bat capture, tagging and radio-tracking 3 2.3 Habitat mapping 4 2.4 Analysis of roost preferences 5 2.5 Analysis of ranges and foraging areas 7 2.6 Analysis of diet 7 3 Results 8 3.1 Capture data 8 3.2 Roost selection and preferences 9 3.3 Ranging and foraging 14 3.4 Diet 17 4 Discussion 21 4.1 Roost use 21 4.2 Ranging behaviour 24 4.3 Diet 25 5 Conclusion 26 References 27 Appendix 1 Summary table of all bat captures 30 Appendix 2 Comparison of individual B.
    [Show full text]
  • List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007)
    UK Biodiversity Action Plan List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) visit https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/uk-bap/ List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) A list of the UK BAP priority terrestrial invertebrate species, divided by taxonomic group into: Insects, Arachnids, Molluscs and Other invertebrates (Crustaceans, Worms, Cnidaria, Bryozoans, Millipedes, Centipedes), is provided in the tables below. The list was created between 1995 and 1999, and subsequently updated in response to the Species and Habitats Review Report published in 2007. The table also provides details of the species' occurrences in the four UK countries, and describes whether the species was an 'original' species (on the original list created between 1995 and 1999), or was added following the 2007 review. All original species were provided with Species Action Plans (SAPs), species statements, or are included within grouped plans or statements, whereas there are no published plans for the species added in 2007. Scientific names and commonly used synonyms derive from the Nameserver facility of the UK Species Dictionary, which is managed by the Natural History Museum. Insects Scientific name Common Taxon England Scotland Wales Northern Original UK name Ireland BAP species? Acosmetia caliginosa Reddish Buff moth Y N Yes – SAP Acronicta psi Grey Dagger moth Y Y Y Y Acronicta rumicis Knot Grass moth Y Y N Y Adscita statices The Forester moth Y Y Y Y Aeshna isosceles
    [Show full text]
  • Download List of Notable Species in Edinburgh
    Group Scientific name Common name International / UK status Scottish status Lothian status marine mammal Balaenoptera acutorostrata Minke Whale HSD PS W5 SBL SO1 marine mammal Delphinus delphis Common Dolphin Bo HSD PS W5 SBL SO1 marine mammal Halichoerus grypus Grey Seal Bo HSD marine mammal Lagenorhynchus albirostris White-beaked Dolphin Bo HSD PS W5 SBL SO1 marine mammal Phocoena phocoena Common Porpoise Bo GVU HSD PS W5 SBL SO1 marine mammal Tursiops truncatus Bottle-Nosed Dolphin Bo HSD PS W5 SBL SO1 terrestrial mammal Arvicola terrestris European Water Vole PS W5 SBL Sc5 terrestrial mammal Erinaceus europaeus West European Hedgehog PS terrestrial mammal Lepus europaeus Brown Hare PS SBL Sc5 terrestrial mammal Lepus timidus Mountain Hare HSD PS SBL Sc5 terrestrial mammal Lutra lutra European Otter HSD PS W5 SBL SO1 terrestrial mammal Meles meles Eurasian Badger BA SBL SO1 terrestrial mammal Micromys minutus Harvest Mouse PS E? terrestrial mammal Myotis daubentonii Daubenton's Bat Bo HSD W5 SBL terrestrial mammal Myotis nattereri Natterer's Bat Bo HSD W5 SBL terrestrial mammal Pipistrellus pipistrellus Pipistrellus pipistrellus Bo HSD W5 terrestrial mammal Pipistrellus pygmaeus Soprano Pipistrelle PS SBL terrestrial mammal Plecotus auritus Brown Long-eared Bat Bo HSD PS W5 SBL terrestrial mammal Sciurus vulgaris Eurasian Red Squirrel PS W5 SBL SO1 bird Accipiter nisus Eurasian Sparrowhawk Bo bird Actitis hypoleucos Common Sandpiper Bo bird Alauda arvensis Sky Lark BCR BD SBL bird Alcedo atthis Common Kingfisher BCA W1 SBL bird Anas
    [Show full text]
  • Buletinul Известия Journal
    Buletinul AŞM. Ştiinţele vieţii. Nr. 3(330) 2016 Buletinul AŞM. Ştiinţele vieţii. Nr. 3(330) 2016 ISSN 1857-064X Categoria B BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A MOLDOVEI Ştiinţele vieţii ИЗВЕСТИЯ АКАДЕМИИ НАУК МОЛДОВЫ Науки о жизНи JOURNAL OF ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF MOLDOVA LIFE SCIENCES 3 (330) 2016 Chişinău Buletinul AŞM. Ştiinţele vieţii. Nr. 3(330) 2016 Buletinul AŞM. Ştiinţele vieţii. Nr. 3(330) 2016 COLEGIUL DE REDACŢIE Redactor-şef Valentina CIOCHINĂ Teodor FURDUI Institutul de Fiziologie şi Sanocreatologie al Aca- Institutul de Fiziologie şi Sanocreatologie al Aca- demiei de Ştiinţe a Moldovei, Laboratorul Fiziolo- demiei de Ştiinţe a Moldovei, Laboratorul Fiziolo- gia stresului, adaptării şi Sanocreatologie generală, gia stresului, adaptării şi Sanocreatologie generală, doctor, conferenţiar. Adresa: str. Academiei, 1, MD- academician, doctor habilitat, profesor. Adresa: str. 2028 Chişinău, Republica Moldova. Tel.: (+373)22 Academiei, 1, MD-2028 Chişinău, Republica Mol- 725152; E-mail: [email protected] dova. Tel.: (+373)22 725209; (+373) 069972538 Gheorghe DUCA Redactor-şef adjunct Institutul de Chimie al Academiei de Ştiinţe a Moldovei, Centrul Chimie Fizică şi Nanocompozite, Ion TODERAŞ academician, doctor habilitat, profesor. Adresa: Institutul de Zoologie al Academiei de Ştiinţe bd.Ştefan cel Mare, 1, MD-2001 Chişinău, a Moldovei, Centrul de Cercetare a Invaziilor Republica Moldova. Tel/Fax.: (+373)22 271478; Biologice, Laboratorul de Sistematică şi Filogenie E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] moleculară, academician, doctor habilitat, profesor. Adresa: str. Academiei, 1, MD-2028 Chişinău, Maria DUCA Republica Moldova. Tel.: (+373)22 731255; Universitatea Academiei de Ştiinţe a Moldovei, E-mail:[email protected] Centrul universitar Genetică funcţională, Secretar responsabil academician, doctor habilitat, profesor.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset's Ecological Network
    Somerset’s Ecological Network Mapping the components of the ecological network in Somerset 2015 Report This report was produced by Michele Bowe, Eleanor Higginson, Jake Chant and Michelle Osbourn of Somerset Wildlife Trust, and Larry Burrows of Somerset County Council, with the support of Dr Kevin Watts of Forest Research. The BEETLE least-cost network model used to produce Somerset’s Ecological Network was developed by Forest Research (Watts et al, 2010). GIS data and mapping was produced with the support of Somerset Environmental Records Centre and First Ecology Somerset Wildlife Trust 34 Wellington Road Taunton TA1 5AW 01823 652 400 Email: [email protected] somersetwildlife.org Front Cover: Broadleaved woodland ecological network in East Mendip Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Policy and Legislative Background to Ecological Networks ............................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Government White Paper on the Natural Environment .............................................. 3 National Planning Policy Framework ......................................................................... 3 The Habitats and Birds Directives ............................................................................. 4 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 7 Moth Species List Froyle Records
    Moth species list Froyle Records extracted 9th December 2012 from the moth databases held by the Hampshire & Isle of Wight Branch of Butterfly Conservation. Contains Lepidoptera records in the Froyle Parish, Hampshire. Taxon Vernacular Abrostola tripartita Spectacle Acasis viretata Yellow-barred Brindle Acleris forsskaleana Acleris variegana Garden Rose Tortrix Adaina microdactyla Adela rufimitrella Agapeta hamana Agonopterix arenella Agonopterix heracliana Agriopis leucophaearia Spring Usher Agriopis marginaria Dotted Border Agriphila straminella Agrochola lota Red-line Quaker Agrochola macilenta Yellow-line Quaker Agrotis exclamationis Heart and Dart Agrotis puta Shuttle-shaped Dart Alcis repandata Mottled Beauty Allophyes oxyacanthae Green-brindled Crescent Alucita hexadactyla Twenty-plume Moth Amblyptilia acanthadactyla Amphipyra pyramidea Copper Underwing Amphipyra pyramidea agg. Copper Underwing agg. Anthophila fabriciana Anticlea badiata Shoulder Stripe Anticlea derivata Streamer Apamea crenata Clouded-bordered Brindle Apamea epomidion Clouded Brindle Apamea monoglypha Dark Arches Apamea sordens Rustic Shoulder-knot Apeira syringaria Lilac Beauty Aphomia sociella Bee Moth Aplocera efformata Lesser Treble-bar Archips podana Large Fruit-tree Tortrix Asteroscopus sphinx Sprawler Autographa gamma Silver Y Autographa pulchrina Beautiful Golden Y Axylia putris Flame Batia unitella Biston betularia Peppered Moth Biston strataria Oak Beauty Blastobasis adustella Page 1 of 7 Blastobasis lacticolella Cabera exanthemata Common Wave Cabera
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 IUFRO Forest Genetics Meeting Proceedings 1
    2004 IUFRO Forest Genetics Meeting Proceedings 1 2004 IUFRO Forest Genetics Meeting Proceedings 2 2004 IUFRO Forest Genetics Meeting Proceedings Table of Contents Foreword_______________________________________________________ 4 Table of Contents – Oral Presentations____________________________ 6 Oral Presentations _______________________________________________ 17 Table of Contents – Poster Presentations___________________________ 400 Poster Presentations _____________________________________________ 403 Participant List _________________________________________________ 467 Title Index ____________________________________________________ 479 Speaker Index __________________________________________________ 485 3 2004 IUFRO Forest Genetics Meeting Proceedings FOREWORD In November 2004, North Carolina State University hosted a joint conference of multiple working parties related to breeding and genetic resource management of IUFRO Division 2. The papers and abstracts that follow in this proceeding were presented at this conference entitled "Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding in the Age of Genomics - Progress and Future". This international conference brought together geneticists, breeders, applied and basic scientists, managers and professional foresters to exchange the latest information on forest genetics and tree breeding, with special focus on potential application of biotechnology and genomics in the future. Given that the topics were important, timely, and pertinent to scientists worldwide, a total of 231 people from 22 countries participated
    [Show full text]