DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 1: Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 1: Introduction CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.0 Introduction This chapter describes the background information of ranking issues within the context of higher education. This chapter contains nine parts. Section 1.1 contains the Background of Study. Subsection 1.1.1 involves Malaysian Government Education Plans whereas subsections 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 identify New Straits Times and World Ranking with all being located under the section 1.1 main text. Section 1.2 covers the Purpose of Study. Significance of Study forms section 1.3, followed by section 1.4 with the Research Questions. In section 1.5 covers the details of the Conclusion. 1.1 Background of study 1.1.1 Malaysian Government Education Plans Education has been proven to be a priority of the Malaysian Government through the extensive development of the academic infrastructure in the last half century. As the development of higher learning took place, the government adjusted departmental responsibilities in order to accommodate the resultant changes. To illustrate, “The Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) was established on 27 March, 2004” in order to consolidate better the management of universities and colleges in the country (Ministry of Higher Education, 2009). The issue of rankings is included in the affairs of higher education matters, as reflected in The National Higher Education Strategic Plan of 2007. The National Higher Education Strategic Plan identified that the past role of the Ministry of Education was to facilitate government matters with the nation’s academic infrastructure. With the division of the department into the separate bodies of the Ministry of Education and Ministry of Higher Education, the responsibility of the latter now handles administrative tasks so the area of higher education within the country may have more focus for development. 1 The ministry’s site also included information that the official distinction of the Ministry of Higher Education as a separate entity happened on 27 March, 2004. In addition to the role of administering government policy, it was also required to assure that tertiary education in Malaysia “is in line with the vision of the government to make Malaysia a centre of educational excellence and to internationalise” the higher education facilities locally. Significant organisation has occurred to construct the path of Malaysian education in such a way that it becomes developed with the component of internationalized status as a primary part. While the ministry has clearly identified domestic interests are of foremost consideration, the inclusion of global elements into the institutional framework of academia has also been voiced. According to the National Higher Education Action Plan of 2007–2010 made available on August 27, 2007, the former Prime Minister Yab Dato’ Seri Abdullah Bin Haji Ahmad Badawi gave a message which indicated that the issue of education was a significant focus of attention and its developmental path was being directed from a nationally administrative position. One of the primary goals listed in the mission statement of the MOHE is to ensure that Malaysian Higher Education is internationalised. The former Prime Minister Yab Dato’ Seri Abdullah Bin Haji Ahmad Badawi stated in the introductory message of the National Higher Education Plan that both the National Mission and the Ninth Malaysia Plan focus on human capital development. The former Minister of Higher Education Dato’ Mustapa Mohamed elaborated on the necessity that "we must bear in mind that in this increasingly global era, Malaysia will be faced with many new challenges and our ‘rakyat’ must be well equipped to face and overcome them" and addressing these challenges could be aided by working on building up five key institutional pillars (National Higher Education 2 Action Plan 2007–2010:4). Governance, leadership, academia, teaching and learning, and research and development constitute the five areas of focus. Governance and leadership also involve the administrative role of the institutions. Three pillars deal directly with educational matters of academia, teaching and learning, and research and development. They contain critical information concerning the direction of Malaysian higher education. The aspect of academia in the Action plan is aimed to cultivate international contacts “through exchange programmes at all levels” (p.24). This includes working with other academic institutions and international companies to achieve these exchanges. Two primary goals indicated for the academic community to achieve within this proposed plan are regular publications in international high-impact journals in addition to a developed pedagogy and research reputation in order to ultimately enable Malaysian higher education to be "respected internationally as an education hub" (p.25). The Action plan also characterized through the teaching and learning focus that an internationalized higher education should be “benchmarked” alongside prominently recognized universities globally. The aspect of Research and Development also maintained the importance of Malaysia’s projected position as an educational hub by emphasizing the importance of knowledge creation. Elaboration on this initiative has indicated that international cooperation and incorporation of foreign faculty members is a proposed method of achieving this portion. One of the proposed results of these directives planned by the MOHE indicates an organized direction toward recognition, acceptance, and comparative status with the global academic community. This is reaffirmed through two of the desired outcomes of the Action Plan where the research universities of Malaysia are desired to become internationally-acclaimed, and five of the nation’s research and development centres achieve world renowned excellence. Alongside the establishment of national 3 universities with research status, the Action Plan includes the establishment of one or two Apex Universities to serve as examples of academic excellence. The specialized status of "an Apex University is a conceptual construct that in due time will stand atop the pyramid of institutions. The Apex Universities will be the nation’s centres of academic distinction" (p.35). As reflected in The National Higher Education Strategic Plan of 2007, institutions selected to receive recognition as an Apex university are required to include successful leaders, highly productive faculty, academically excellent students, and fully-equipped facilities. This category requires larger budgets and greater autonomy concerning the operation. Although the exclusive class for universities has been determined, criteria for classification have not been included in detail. The Star reported that "having apex universities is good for the country's branding as it will give us an international focus,” (“Reaching For The Top”, 2007). Inclusion of an Apex status for the universities in Malaysia may indicate that it is being employed for both internal and external reasons. From an international perspective, it appears that this will distinguish the class of universities accorded this distinction from the other institutions and hopefully attract talent from elsewhere. Internally, it has been mentioned by the higher education minister that it might encourage other institutions to work harder. Bajunid (2012) indicated in the New Straits Times that University of Malaya had been the only academic institution within Malaysia up until the 1960s. Since that time, in little more than 50 years, large-scale planning has been applied to expand the nation's academic infrastructure. Based on recent statistics from the Ministry of Higher Education official portal, the state of Malaysian academics has increased significantly. Currently, higher education opportunities in Malaysia include 20 public universities, 22 polytechnics, 37 public community colleges, 33 private universities and university colleges, 4 foreign university branch campuses and about 500 private colleges (Ministry 4 of Higher Education, 2009). The efforts to expand from only a single institution that existed 50 years ago with University of Malaya to what exists in the 21st century of Malaysia's higher education system indicates an achievement in working toward the goal of an international education hub. 1.1.2 New Straits Times The first paper put into publication was The Prince of Wales Island Government Gazette, which was started in Pulau Pinang, known as modern day Penang, in 1806 (Othman, 1992). Malaya's first printed news source sporadically remained in print until 1830 (Wade, 2002). Numerous other publications were in circulation during that time and eventually ceased production for equally numerous reasons. Fifteen years later, in 1845, the first issue of the Straits Times was printed and distributed as a weekly publication (The New Straits Times Press, 2013). Since the initial production of the Straits Times, many changes have occurred such as ownership, physical layout, and name, but the continuous transformations of this paper led to the form recognised today. The year was 1967 for when the current name was chosen in order to maintain compliance with the new Companies Act which became effective in 1966 and that was The New Straits Times (The New Straits Times Press, 2013). As Malaysia's oldest newspaper that has remained in publication, The New Straits Times is the second largest circulated English-language newspaper, second only to The Star (Audit Bureau of Circulations, 2013). Currently it is owned by Media Prima Berhad (Media Prima, 2013).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The House of the Rising Sons
    PP3739/12/2004 ISSN 0127 - 5127 / RM3.00 / 2004:Vol.24No.9 Aliran Monthly : Vol.24(9) Page 1 COVER STORY TheThe HouseHouse ofof thethe RisingRising SonsSons What they didn’t debate at the UMNO General Assembly by Khoo Boo Teik n the old BBC TV series, II Yes Minister, the wily but III likeable mandarin, Sir Humphrey Appleby, ex- plained the ‘Law of Inverse Rel- evance’ in government thus: The less you intend to do about something, the more you have to keep talking about it. Or, as Barisan Nasional politicos so cheaply love to taunt their crit- ics and the opposition with it, ‘NATO’ – ‘No Action Talk Only’, except the BN types wouldn’t dare to apply it to UMNO’s first Gen- eral Assembly to be held in 22 years without Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s presiding influence. But look at what transpired, or didn’t, during the Assembly. UMNO endorsed its new Presi- dent, Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, and his deputy, Datuk Najib Tun Razak, without any fuss. That, however, was a foregone conclu- sion after the Mahathir-Abdullah transition and the March general election. There being no genuine excite- ment over serious issues, a bit of Predictably, ‘Inverse Relevance’ Failure Baru B-Grade drama was provided by took over, followed by … ‘NATO’: Or Ubat Lama? some complaints that ‘money poli- those complaints were raised and tics’ had influenced the results of dropped with no evidence that For that matter, there was a lot of the party elections at the Vice- real offenders will be identified talk about ‘the Malay agenda’ and President and Supreme Council and real action taken against the New Economic Policy, matters levels.
    [Show full text]
  • J-QAF’ Program in Malaysia
    310 Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 6(3): 310-315, 2012 ISSN 1995-0772 This is a refereed journal and all articles are professionally screened and reviewed ORIGINAL ARTICLE The Islamic Education and The ‘j-QAF’ Program in Malaysia 1Farid Mat Zain, 1,2Wan Kamal Mujani and 1Ibrahim Abu Bakar 1Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. 2Institute of West Asian Studies (IKRAB), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. Farid Mat Zain, Wan Kamal Mujani and Ibrahim Abu Bakar; The Islamic Education and The ‘j-QAF’ Program in Malaysia ABSTRACT Recently the Islamic education in some Muslim countries such as Pakistan and Afghanistan are said to produce the supporters of Muslim terrorists. The bad and ugly image of the Islamic education is not in line with the noble, sublime and pristine goals of Islam and its education namely to inculcate the good and beneficial values in human minds and souls. Both human minds and spirits are important to be inculcated and trained with the good and beneficial values because good and useful conducts and actions originate from good, sound, healthy minds and souls. Evil and useless conducts and actions originate from evil and useless minds and souls. Hence both Islam and its education pay attention to human minds and souls with the hope of producing good and useful Muslims. For this good reason, all Muslims rely on their Islamic education for their children. They do not believe that the Islamic education should produce bad and evil Muslims who terrorize human beings since the Muslims themselves are human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Evolution of Ethnocracy in Malaysia
    Volume 7 | Issue 47 | Number 4 | Article ID 3259 | Nov 16, 2009 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Origins and Evolution of Ethnocracy in Malaysia Geoff Wade The Origins and Evolution of1957 Constitution has been used as a basis for Ethnocracy in Malaysia all manner of exclusionist and discriminatory policies which have become increasingly Geoff Wade socially encompassing, producing a situation where non-Malay members of Malaysian 1. Introduction society feel themselves excluded and thereby ignored in terms of access to “public” facilities, How is it that today in the diverse, multi-ethnic funds and opportunities. The March 2008 polity of Malaysia (where government figures election results were in part a reflection of give a population breakdown of 65%sentiments over this socially inequitable Bumiputra, 26% Chinese and 8% Indian), a situation. single ethnic group completely controls - and occupies virtually all positions in - the judiciary, 2. The History of Ethnocracy in public administrative organs, the police, the Malaya/Malaysia from 1942 armed forces and increasingly the universities? While Malays constitute a majority of the Let us begin the account with 1942, and population of this nation, their presence in all proceed to earlier times later in the paper. these spheres of power far exceeds their ratio Even from the beginning of the Japanese within the general population. How did this invasion and occupation of Malaya and situation emerge and how has it evolved? Singapore over the period 1941-45, it was obvious to the British and others that there would need to be a real reassessment of the British role in the peninsula and Borneo post- war.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into Australia's Relationship with Malaysia
    Submission No 11 Inquiry into Australia’s Relationship with Malaysia Organisation: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Contact Person: Kate Duff Assistant Secretary South-East Asia Division Address: Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Foreign Affairs Sub-Committee Australian Covernnient Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Submission by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Foreign Affairs Sub-Committee INQUIRY INTO AUSTRALIA’S RELATIONSHIP WITH MALAYSIA —1— Australia-Malaysia Bilateral Relations Introduction Malaysia’s impressive economic development, location, active participation in our immediate region, and its long-standing relationship with Australia in many spheres makes Malaysia an important bilateral partner. The bilateral relationship is diverse, with active and cooperative relations across a broad range of sectors. These include trade and investment, education, defence, counter-terrorism, law enforcement, people smuggling, tourism and aviation. Historical Background Given the proximity ofour countries, links between Australia and Malaysia are long- standing and reach back to the th century. One ofthe most notable early indications 18 of the presence of Malaysians in Australia was in the th century when Malays 19 participated in the pearling industry off Australia’s north coast. Today their descendants form an integral part of Darwin’s multicultural society. William Light, the son of Francis Light (who acquired Penang on behalf of the British East India Company in 1786), planned the city of Adelaide in 1837. Today, Georgetown in Penang and Adelaide commemorate this early link with a formal sister city relationship. Australian troops have fought on a number ofoccasions alongside Malaysians.
    [Show full text]
  • Kajian Tentang Cabaran Dan Masalahnya Di Melaka Fakulti Akademi Pengajian Islam Tahun 2013
    NAMA MOHAMAD NAZLI BIN OMAR NO MATRIK IHA 080063 PENGURUSAN DAKWAH DI NEGERI TAJUK TESIS MAJU : KAJIAN TENTANG CABARAN DAN MASALAHNYA DI MELAKA FAKULTI AKADEMI PENGAJIAN ISLAM TAHUN 2013 PENGURUSAN DAKWAH DI NEGERI MAJU : KAJIAN TENTANG CABARAN DAN MASALAHNYA DI MELAKA MOHAMAD NAZLI BIN OMAR JABATAN DAKWAH DAN PEMBANGUNAN INSAN AKADEMI PENGAJIAN ISLAM UNIVERSITI MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR 2013 PENGURUSAN DAKWAH DI NEGERI MAJU : KAJIAN TENTANG CABARAN DAN MASALAHNYA DI MELAKA MOHAMAD NAZLI BIN OMAR TESIS INI DIKEMUKAKAN UNTUK MEMENUHI KEPERLUAN BAGI IJAZAH DOKTOR FALSAFAH JABATAN DAKWAH DAN PEMBANGUNAN INSAN AKADEMI PENGAJIAN ISLAM UNIVERSITI MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR 2013 ABSTRAK Negeri Melaka telah diiktiraf sebagai sebuah negeri maju pada tahun 2010 oleh Organization Of Economic Co-Operation Development setelah memenuhi beberapa indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Di antara indikator yang telah ditetapkan merangkumi kriteria ekonomi, politik dan sosial dengan pembahagian-pembahagian yang tertentu. Namun, dengan kemajuan yang dikecapi ini, ia telah memberi pelbagai impak kepada rakyat di negeri ini menerusi kemajuan yang dicapai ini. Seterusnya, ia juga telah memberi kesan kepada pengembangan dakwah di negeri ini memandangkan negeri Melaka ini suatu ketika dahulu merupakan salah sebuah negeri yang terawal menerima kedatangan Islam malahan dapatan sejarah juga menjelaskan bahawa Melaka adalah sebuah pusat penyebaran Islam di Malaysia. Sehubungan dengan itu, kajian ini telah mensasarkan tiga objektif utama berhubung latarbelakang kajian ini yang tertumpu kepada pengurusan dakwah di dalam negeri maju. Kajian ini mensasarkan objektif bagi mengetahui tentang realiti Melaka sebagai sebuah negeri maju. Selain daripada itu, kajian ini juga akan mengenalpasti tentang cabaran dan masalah pengurusan dakwah dalam sebuah negeri maju dengan memfokuskan kepada negeri Melaka yang telah diiktiraf sebagai sebuah negeri maju pada tahun 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Umno Members Should Not Feel Inferior to Pas on Islam, Says Dpm
    12 MAR 2000 Abdullah-Islam UMNO MEMBERS SHOULD NOT FEEL INFERIOR TO PAS ON ISLAM, SAYS DPM MENTAKAB, March 12 (Bernama) -- Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said Umno members and supporters should not let PAS rhetorics make them feel inferior and guilt-ridden over fighting for the Islamic cause. For instance, he said, they should not subscribe to PAS' fallacious exhortations that a vote for the opposition party was a ticket to heaven. Addressing community leaders in the Sanggang state constituency here today, Abdullah said proof abound of Umno consistently putting Islam uppermost in realising its ideals. "In fact we have all along strive for Islam and we've proven our capabilities in uplifting the image of Islam more than any other party," he said. The Umno cause for religion, race and country should be cause for pride among party members, he said. He cautioned party members against PAS' schemes to undermine their faith in Umno especially with the impending Sanggang state by-election slated for April 1. Umno, he said, regarded the by-election as crucial as it was determined to keep the party's representation in the Pahang state legislature intact. He said the Barisan Nasional election machinery should share similar determination to maintain the coalition's hold on the state legislative assembly. Abdullah said this called for the BN election machinery to give their best to help the BN candidate retain the seat. While nomination has been fixed for March 21, the BN had already named Redzwan Harun, 49, who is chairman of Mentakab Umno division religious bureau, as its candidate.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Menteri Baru, 3 Gugur (HL) (BH 11/12/1999)
    11/12/1999 9 menteri baru, 3 gugur (HL) Kadir Dikoh; Jamhariah Jaafar; Johny Giles Senin PUTRAJAYA, Jumaat - Tujuh muka baru adalah antara sembilan menteri baru yang diumumkan menganggotai Kabinet Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad, hari ini. Tiga menteri sebelum ini digugurkan, manakala tiga lagi berpindah portfolio. Perdana Menteri turut membuat kejutan dengan melantik bekas Naib Canselor Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Tan Sri Musa Mohamad, sebagai Menteri Pendidikan yang baru. Musa akan dilantik sebagai senator bagi membolehkannya memegang jawatan itu. Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi kekal sebagai Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Dalam Negeri, manakala Tun Daim Zainuddin masih memegang portfolio Kewangan dan Menteri Tugas-tugas Khas. Daripada sembilan menteri baru, lima ialah timbalan menteri yang dinaikkan pangkat. Mereka ialah Datuk Nazri Abdul Aziz sebagai Menteri Pembangunan Usahawan; Datuk Hishammuddin Tun Hussein (Belia dan Sukan); Datuk Azmi Khalid (Pembangunan Luar Bandar); Datuk Dr Fong Chan Onn (Sumber Manusia); dan Datuk Ong Ka Ting (Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan). Seorang lagi muka baru ialah Pengerusi Natseven TV (ntv7), Datuk Effendi Norwawi sebagai Menteri Pertanian. Turut dilantik ialah Ahli Parlimen Jelebu, Datuk Dr Rais Yatim dan Presiden Pertubuhan Pasokmomogun Kadazandusun Bersatu (Upko), Tan Sri Bernard Dompok - kedua-duanya sebagai Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri (JPM). Bagaimanapun Dr Rais dan Dompok tidak boleh dianggap muka baru dalam Kabinet. Dr Rais pernah menyertai Kabinet dengan jawatan terakhir sebagai Menteri Luar pada 1987 dan Dompok ialah Menteri di JPM sehingga 1995. Menteri yang digugurkan dalam senarai Kabinet ialah Datuk Amar Dr Sulaiman Daud (Pertanian); Datuk Dr Ting Chew Peh (Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan); dan Datin Paduka Zaleha Ismail (Perpaduan Negara dan Pembangunan Masyarakat).
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Julai 2013
    Bil. 13 Isnin 15 Julai 2013 MALAYSIA PENYATA RASMI PARLIMEN DEWAN RAKYAT PARLIMEN KETIGA BELAS PENGGAL PERTAMA MESYUARAT PERTAMA Diterbitkan Oleh: CAWANGAN PENYATA RASMI PARLIMEN MALAYSIA 2013 K A N D U N G A N JAWAPAN-JAWAPAN LISAN BAGI PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN (Halaman 1) RANG UNDANG-UNDANG Rang Undang-undang Perbekalan Tambahan (2012) 2013 (Halaman 72) USUL-USUL: Penguntukan Semula Peruntukan Perbelanjaan Di Bawah P.M. 66A (Halaman 19) Anggaran Pembangunan Tambahan (Bil.1) 2012 (Halaman 74) Diterbitkan Oleh: CAWANGAN PENYATA RASMI PARLIMEN MALAYSIA 2013 DR.15.07.2013 i AHLI-AHLI DEWAN RAKYAT 1. Yang Berhormat Tuan Yang di-Pertua, Tan Sri Datuk Seri Panglima Pandikar Amin Haji Mulia, P.S.M., S.P.D.K., S.U.M.W., P.G.D.K., J.S.M., J.P. 2. “ Timbalan Yang di-Pertua, Datuk Ronald Kiandee, P.G.D.K., A.S.D.K. [Beluran] - UMNO 3. “ Timbalan Yang di-Pertua, Dato’ Haji Ismail bin Haji Mohamed Said, D.I.M.P., S.M.P., K.M.N. [Kuala Krau] - UMNO MENTERI 1. Yang Amat Berhormat Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan I, Dato’ Sri Mohd. Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak, Orang Kaya Indera Shah Bandar, S.P.D.K., S.S.A.P., S.S.S.J., S.I.M.P., D.P.M.S., D.S.A.P., P.N.B.S. (Pekan) – UMNO 2. “ Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Pendidikan I, Tan Sri Dato’ Haji Muhyiddin bin Mohd. Yassin, P.S.M., S.P.M.P., S.P.M.J., S.M.J., P.I.S., B.S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaders Gone from Cabinet but Not from Life of Politics Zubaidah Abu Bakar February 15, 2006 New Straits Times
    Leaders gone from Cabinet but not from life of politics Zubaidah Abu Bakar February 15, 2006 New Straits Times Feb 14: DATUK SERI ABDUL KADIR SHEIKH FADZIR's departure from the Cabinet does not spell an end to active politics for the outgoing Information Minister. The veteran politician expects to have his plate full explaining government policy to the people - but without ministerial responsibilities. Perhaps the most colourful minister in terms of his views and appearance, the lawyer who favours bow-ties intends to seek re-election to the Kulim-Bandar Baru parliament seat at the next general election. He also wants to go for an Umno supreme council seat, which eluded him in 2004. "I intend to be more active in politics. I have been holding positions in Umno since 1956 and it is difficult to stop being active in politics," he said. Kadir, who described his working relationship with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and his deputy Datuk Seri Najib Razak as an "extremely happy one", said he would actively rally support for the Government. "Abdullah's administration is facing different and difficult times and everybody should be helping them. I hope to go around the country to help explain government policies and strengthen the party (Umno)." Kadir, who resigned as Information Minister yesterday, said his decision to quit the Cabinet had nothing to do with the reshuffle nor pressure after his supreme council ouster. His reasons lie closer to home and a family he had not seen as often as he wanted to. "Because of my passion and commitment to the job, I failed miserably in giving reasonable time to my family and my own personal affairs." His departure comes a full nine months after he broached the subject with Abdullah.
    [Show full text]
  • US Department of State Self Study Guide for Malaysia, October 2002
    Description of document: US Department of State Self Study Guide for Malaysia, October 2002 Requested date: 11-March-2007 Released date: 25-Mar-2010 Posted date: 19-April-2010 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Office of Information Programs and Services A/GIS/IPS/RL U. S. Department of State Washington, D. C. 20522-8100 Fax: 202-261-8579 Note: This is one of a series of self-study guides for a country or area, prepared for the use of USAID staff assigned to temporary duty in those countries. The guides are designed to allow individuals to familiarize themselves with the country or area in which they will be posted. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Amini Amir Abdullah (Ph.D)
    Curriculum Vitae 2018 Dr. Amini Amir Abdullah (Ph.D) University Lecturer (SSB) Department of Nationhood (Government) and Civilization Studies Faculty of Human Ecology Universiti Putra Malaysia 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan Amini Amir A. Page | ii Curriculum Vitae 2018 CONTENTS CONTENTS i BRIEF CURRICULUM VITAE iv Executive Summary v Summary Statistics vii Table 1 : Summary of Courses Taught vii Table 2 : Summary of Student Supervision viii Table 3 : Summary of Research Projects ix Table 4 : Summary of Publications ix Table 5 : Summary of Community & Network Industry x CURRICULUM VITAE 1 Personal Profile 2 Academic Qualification 3 Field of Expertise 3 Research Interest 3 Early Education 4 Present Occupation 4 Working Experience 5 TEACHING & SUPERVISION 7 Courses By Semester 8 Teaching Assessment 19 Student Supervision 28 Undergraduate (Supervisor): Graduated 28 Undergraduate (Supervisor): Ongoing 31 Master Supervision 32 Master Science (Chairman): On Going 32 Master Science (Chairman): Completed 32 Master Science (Member): On Going 32 PhD Thesis Supervision 33 PhD (Chairman): On Going 33 PhD (Chairman): Completed 33 PhD (Member): On Going 34 PhD (Member): Completed 34 RESEARCH & PUBLICATION 35 Research Grants 36 Project Leader: On Going 36 Project Leader: Completed 36 Project Member: On Going 37 Project Member: Completed 38 Research Outcome 39 Intelectual Property 40 Copyright 40 Academic Publication 40 Conference/ Seminar(s) Proceedings 40 International 40 National 44 Conference/ Seminar(S) Presented (Orally) 50 Amini Amir A.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of University Autonomy in Malaysia
    Policy IDEAS № 40 May 2017 The History of University Autonomy in Malaysia Chang-Da Wan 2 The History of University Autonomy in Malaysia Policy IDEAS № 40 Introduction During his New Year’s speech in 2012, then Minister of Higher Education, Mohamed Khaled Nordin announced that Malaysia’s five public universities, the oldest in the country, would be given an autonomous status. Autonomy in this sense meant that the universities were given the freedom to self-govern, manage its own finances and generate its own source of income. They could manage their own resources including hiring and firing their own staff and had full control over the academic management of the institution including student intakes - all of this provided that the universities succeeded in meeting the mark after an audit by the Code of University Good Governance and University Good Governance Index (Ministry of Higher Education, 2011). The Minister also explained that the Vice Chancellor and Board of Governors would assume the ministry’s roles in governing the university, and importantly that “[these universities] would not be tied down by Government rules or processes” (Priya, 2012). Since then the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) has awarded 17 of the 20 public universities in Malaysia autonomy. But are Malaysian universities truly autonomous? And if so, how did they lack independence from the government in the past? Has there ever been a point in our history where higher education institutions were fully autonomous? This study attempts to answer these questions by exploring the historical development of university autonomy in Malaysia. It analyses the current state of university autonomy in Malaysia and suggest ways in which Malaysian universities can better embrace the notion of autonomy.
    [Show full text]