DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Better Elections Results of the European Electoral Management Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Better Elections Results of the European Electoral Management Survey Building Better Elections Results of the European Electoral Management Survey Toby S. James, Holly Ann Garnett, Leontine Loeber & Carolien van Ham April 2020 1 Building Better Elections: Electoral Management in Europe Building Better Elections There is considerable variation in the quality of the delivery of elections around the world. One factor that contributes towards this is the design of the electoral management body/bodies (EMBs) that are responsible for delivering elections. This policy brief presents pioneering data on variations in the institutional design of EMBs in Europe. It also highlights new research findings about ‘what works’ in improving electoral integrity. There is considerable variation in practice across Europe, and worldwide. Eight policy interventions to improve electoral integrity are proposed, which includes greater EMB independence, resourcing, training and management of workplace conditions. Introduction It is often said by policy-makers and academics that EMBs that are independent should be used to deliver While many elections across the world are conducted elections. However, there is remarkably little data to very high standards, there remains evidence of about how elections are managed across countries. In problems with the delivery of elections in both turn, there has been very little analysis of 'what works' transitional and established democracies. These when it comes to Improving electoral management. In problems are important as they can lead to citizens this policy we summarise new data on how elections losing their right to cast a ballot, have their confidence are run in Europe. We also point to new research in democratic institutions undermined or even lead to findings about how electoral integrity can be improved wider conflict and political instability. that was generated with this research by combining it with data sources. There are always multiple causes of problems and many solutions. One major factor, however, is the For more on the survey, see the Introduction to the Special Issue “Building Better Elections,” In the actual design of the electoral management International Political Science Review. Guest Edited body/bodies who deliver the elections. Are they by: Toby S James, Holly Ann Garnett, Leontine Loeber independent from government? Do they have and Carolien van Ham. Visit sufficient capacity? What technology are they using? https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119828206 Are their staff well trained and independent? 2 Building Better Elections: Electoral Management in Europe Methodology Key Findings To understand the organizational determinants of Independence electoral management body performance and electoral integrity outcomes, pioneering data on variation in the EMBs were asked about their institutional design, as it institutional design of EMBs worldwide was collected. relates to how they function in relationship to other The European Electoral Management Survey (EMS) branches of government, and where they fit within the was conducted between July 2016 and October 2017 government bureaucracy. Traditionally, systems of by Toby S. James, Holly Ann Garnett, Leontine Loeber electoral management have been classified according and Carolien van Ham, and administered with the to three categories: independent, governmental or support of the Venice Commission. mixed. The independent model, also sometimes Figure 1: Participating European Countries referred to as the agency model, sees EMBs as arms- (Structural Survey) length from the executive branch of government. Governmental models, on the other hand, are often election administrators that work from within a government department or ministry. The mixed model refers to countries where both exist, and each have specific functions or oversight over elections in the country. In the European Electoral Management Survey, organizations were asked how they saw themselves: as independent, governmental or other. Of those countries that responded, the majority (17) identified themselves as independent bodies (65%), while 9 EMBs (35%) categorized themselves as within a government department. Figure 2: Formal Independence: Is your organization... The project both included a structural survey and a personnel survey and included a series of common questions in each survey. The structural survey was Within completed by one senior official from each EMB. This government survey collected data on the organisational design of department 35% the EMB, their tasks and responsibilities, the decision- making process, budgets, staff and training. Independent 65% Where appropriate, multiple EMBs were contacted in each country. In many countries, multiple organizations are involved in the administration of elections. As such, the results presented here represent 27 European countries that responded to the structural survey. See the Appendix for a full listing of Percentage of 26 countries that responded to this question. countries and organizations surveyed. It Is important to note that the sample is not necessarily representative Rather than functioning out of the executive, or because it is possible that those who are responding bureaucratic, branches of government, some EMBs are not representative of the population. are part of the judicial branch of government, such as a special electoral tribunal, for example. In this survey, The dataset is available for download on Harvard only 5 EMBs identified as a specialized judicial body. Dataverse: "Comparative Structural Survey Election Management Bodies EMS", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1X5FVB 3 Building Better Elections: Electoral Management in Europe Figure 3: Specialized Judicial Bodies: Figure 5: Basis of Appointment: Is your organization... EMB Chair/President Party stataus 4% Both professional qualifications and A party status specialised 11% judicial body 22% Other 21% Professional Not a status specialised 64% judicial body 78% Percentage of 23 countries that responded to this question. Percentage of 28 countries that responded to this question. Figure 6: Basis of Appointment: A final dimension of independence is EMBs’ inclusion EMB Members (or not) of political parties in their management boards. There are arguments to suggest that involving political Both professional qualifications and parties in electoral management will lead to better party status cooperation, as parties can serve as “watchdogs” of 13% their elections. In this survey, the vast majority (19) of EMBs reported they did not include political parties in Other their organization. 17% Figure 4: Partisan Membership: Is your organisation… Professional Qualifications 70% Mixed partisan non- partisan 17% Note: Percentage of 23 countries that responded to this question. For more on the specific organisational design features Non- that shape EMB formal independence such as partisan appointment procedures, budgetary control, and formal 83% competences, see Carolien van Ham and Holly Ann Garnett. “Building Impartial Electoral Management? Institutional design, Independence and Electoral Integrity.” In the International Political Science Review. Note: Percentage of 23 countries that responded to this Visit https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119834573. question. Another dimension of independence concerns the The European EMBs studied here were asked about basis of appointment of the EMB chair and board their powers for specific electoral functions. The most members. In this survey, the basis of appointment for common of these powers was to order a recount both the EMB chair and EMB board members were (partial or full) of results, though still only 9 EMBs predominately their professional qualifications (18 for noted they had this power. EMB chair, and 16 for EMB board members). However, a considerable portion of EMBs studied also noted unique procedures for choosing these important actors. 4 Building Better Elections: Electoral Management in Europe Budgets Figure 7: EMB Powers Does your organization have powers to… Budgetary data was collected from participating EMBs, however, it is difficult to compare these data directly, Call elections 12% since each EMB includes different tasks and activities in their budget. Order a recount (partial or 35% full) of results More comparable between countries is the response to Order re-polling in particular the question of whether the EMB's budget has 27% polling stations increase or decreased over the past 5 years. For the European countries studied here, most reported that Completely annul an election 31% their budget had remained about the same. Only 3 countries reported decreases in their EMB budget. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Percentage of EMBs Figure 9: Budgets Would you say that over the past 5 years your overall budget has… Percentage of 26 EMBs that responded to this question. Centralization Decidedly increased 3 EMBs were asked about their relationship with other Somewhat increased 4 EMBs at the regional or local level. 7 EMBs reported that these regional or local EMBs were subordinate Remained about the same 9 and accountable to the national EMB. Only 3 EMBs reported that regional or local electoral management Womewhat decreased 2 bodies were separate and autonomous from the national EMB. However, the greatest number of Decidedly decreased countries responded 'other' and described alternative 1 arrangements between the local, regional and national 0 2 4 6 8 10 levels. For example, Belarus and Croatia reported that Number of EMBs regional or local electoral commissions are created for specific elections that report
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elections Held and Mitigating Measures Taken During COVID-19 – As of October 21, 2020
    Featured Elections Held and Mitigating Measures Taken During COVID-19 – As of October 21, 2020 Contents Mitigating Measures During Recent Elections ................................................................................. 1 Other Mitigating Measures ............................................................................................................... 15 Mitigating Measures During Recent Elections This list focuses on some of the measures election management bodies (EMBs) around the globe are using when holding electoral activities amid COVID-19. The International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) has not analyzed these mitigating measures for their effectiveness or desirability. Please contact IFES at [email protected] if you know of additional mitigating measures or believe any data in this resource to be inaccurate. Israel General Elections – March 4, 2020 Israelis under quarantine from the coronavirus voted at separate, tented-off polling locations. Paramedics “dressed in head-to-toe protective gear stood guard” at these designated polling stations, where election officials sat behind sheeted plastic to ensure voting operations went smoothly while staying protected.1 France Municipal Elections – Round 1 on March 15, 2020 On March 14, France introduced significant restrictions to curb the spread of COVID-19, such as banning gatherings of over 100 people, closing schools and nonessential shops and suspending sporting events. However, France continued to hold local elections on March 15. Proxy voting is permitted
    [Show full text]
  • Presentación De Powerpoint
    The world has been radically transformed since the seventies, Content 1. CICIE´s Programs especially in relation to the expansion of political liberties and the openness of the political systems to direct the growing and International Internship Monitoring of Election complex political diversity of the contemporary society. Campaign Expenses – TE Panama.........4 The National Electoral Institute is an active member within the Exchange of Experiences on Monitoring and international network of bodies and institutions working in favor Social Networks and Policies on Gender and of electoral democracy. Non-Discrimination - RNEC Colombia)…....… 9 9th Forum on Latin American Democracy…… 17 INE’s role is also oriented towards promoting a wider collaboration program within different electoral democracy International Workshop Monitoring and Auditing the Finances of Political Parties areas: electoral observation, technical assistance missions, Election Campaigns and Social Networks research and currently, by offering an international training - ISIE, HAICA and CC -Tunisia/ EC Nepal)……...25 program. Reciprocally, INE benefits from the international field through the 2 INE International Linking Activities……32 promotion of international horizontal cooperation and from the knowledge gained of learning about other practices through the Participation of International Events……….. 34 exchange of experiences; also, by participating and generating Electoral Observation: knowledge through the discussion and debate forums with avant- Ecuador…….. 38 garde matters, along with challenges faced by electoral democracies. 3. Elections in the World…… 45 4. Publications: Women in Politics…… 53 This Newsletter´s edition presents the knowledge exchange activities that were carried out by the International Center for Electoral Research and Training (CICIE) during the first quarter of 2019, as well as for other international activities in which INE was involved such as forums, conferences, or electoral observation missions.
    [Show full text]
  • I~~~I~ ~I~M~ * a D E 2 2 9 * I I I I I I I I
    Date Printed: 11/03/2008 JTS Box Number: IFES 3 Tab Number: 32 Document Title: Election Observation El Salvador, March 20 - April 24, 1994 Document Date: 1994 Document Country: El Salvador IFES ID: R01588 I~~~I~ ~I~m~ * A D E 2 2 9 * I I I I I I I I N A L 0 F I \ 0 '\ '-. U \'- "It I ~ 0 ~ .., I '<I .>. f.... .". I <: 0 z DO NOT REMOVE FROM IFES RESOURCE CENTER! I -=.'·~S International Foundation for Election Systems I lI1 110115th STREET, NW.· THIRD flOOR· WASHINGTON, D.C 20005 • (202) 8288507 • fAA (202) 452~ I I El Salvador I Election Observation: March 20-April 24, 1994 I I I I I I I I I I August 8, 1994 I Kelly McBride I BOARD OF DIREGORS Barbara Boggs Peter G. Kelly William R. Sweeney, Jr. DIREGORS EMERITI Charles T. Manatt Patricia Hutar Dame Eugenia Charles Maureen A. Kindel leon J. Weil James M. Cannon Chairman Secretary (Dominica) I Jean-Pierre Kingsley Randal C. Teague Richard M. Scammon David R. Jones Joseph Napolitan Judy G. Fernald (Canada) Counsel Vice Chairman Treasurer Victor Kamber Peter McPherson Richard W. Soudriette I President I Election Observation II EL SALVADOR II March 20, 1994 - April 24, 1994 II II II II II II II II August 8, 1994 II II This repon was made possible throughjunding by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) I An)' person or organization ;s we/come 10 quote infonnation from this report if i1 is attributed to IFES I I I! ------------------- EL SALVADOR .
    [Show full text]
  • INTER-AMERICAN MEETING of ELECTORAL MANAGEMENT BODIES 1 This Is a Publication of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States (GS/OAS)
    Inter-American Meeting VIII of Electoral Management Bodies SEPTEMBER 18-19, 2012, MONTEGO BAY, JAMAICA EIGHTH INTER-AMERICAN MEETING OF ELECTORAL MANAGEMENT BODIES 1 This is a publication of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States (GS/OAS). OAS publications are inde- pendent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of the Organization of American States (OAS) or its Member States. This publication may not be reproduced in whole or in part or stored in or transmitted by any information retrieval system, in any form or by any means. © General Secretariat of the Organization of American States 2014 Team: Compilation of Report: Juliette Maughan, Consultant, (DECO/OAS). Project Coordinator: Sara Mía Noguera, Chief, Electoral Studies and Projects Section, Department of Electoral Cooperation and Observation, Organization of American States (DECO/OAS). Editing: Brenda Santamaría, Specialist, Electoral Studies and Projects Section (DECO/OAS). Applications for permissions to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: GS/OAS 17th St. & Constitution Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 USA OAS Cataloging in-Publication Data Inter-American Meeting of Electoral Management Bodies (8th : 2012 : Montego Bay, Jamaica) Eighth Inter-American Meeting of Electoral Management Bodies : The role of EMBs in candidate selection processes; Vote counting, data transmission, and preliminary results reporting [held in] Montego Bay, Jamaica, September 18-19, 2012. p. ; cm. (OAS official records ; OEA/Ser.D/XX SG/SAP/III.4.8) ISBN 978-0-8270-6128-6 1. Elections--America--Congresses. 2. Democracy--America--Congresses.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.1 the Relationship Between Political Parties and Electoral Authorities: Lessons from the Mexican Case
    Strengthening Electoral Processes and Systems throughout the Hemisphere: The Role of the Media in Electoral Campaigns and the Relationship Between Electoral Management Bodies and Political Parties Second Inter-American Electoral Training Seminar OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data Inter-American Electoral Training Seminar (2nd : 2009 : Mexico City) Fortaleciendo los procesos electorales en el hemisferio : el papel de los medios de comunicación en las campañas electorales y la relación entre las autoridades electorales y los partidos políticos = Strengthening electoral processes and systems throughout the hemisphere : the role of the media in electoral campaigns and the relationship between electoral management bodies and political parties / [presentaciones a] la segunda Jornada Interamericana Electoral [la cual] se llevó a cabo en Ciudad de México del 28 de septiembre al 3 de octubre de 2009. p. ; cm. ISBN 978-0-8270-5484-4 1. Democracy--Study and teaching--America--Congresses. 2. Political culture--America--Congresses. 3. Elections--Study and teaching--America--Congresses. 4. Press and politics--Study and teaching--America--Congresses. 5. Electioneering- -Study and teaching--America--Congresses. JF1001 .I58 2009 OEA/Ser.D/XX SG/SAP/III.10.2 Strengthening Electoral Processes and Systems throughout the Hemisphere: The Role of the Media in Electoral Campaigns and Relations Between Electoral Management Bodies and Political Parties This is a publication of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States (GS/OAS) in cooperation with the Federal Electoral Institute of Mexico (IFE). Project Coordination: Betilde Muñoz – Pogossian, Head, Section for Electoral Studies and Projects, Department for Electoral Cooperation and Observation (DECO). Compilation of Report: Claudia Zambra, Consultant, OAS/DECO Editing: Charlotte McDowell, Specialist, Section for Electoral Studies and Projects, Department for Electoral Cooperation and Observation.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Processes Report | SGI Sustainable Governance Indicators
    Sustainable Governance Indicators SGI 2015 Electoral Processes Report Candidacy Procedures, Media Access, Voting and Registration Rights, Party Financing, Popular Decision-Making SGI 2015 | 2 Electoral Processes Indicator Candidacy Procedures Question How fair are procedures for registering candidates and parties? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = Legal regulations provide for a fair registration procedure for all elections; candidates and parties are not discriminated against. 8-6 = A few restrictions on election procedures discriminate against a small number of candidates and parties. 5-3 = Some unreasonable restrictions on election procedures exist that discriminate against many candidates and parties. 2-1 = Discriminating registration procedures for elections are widespread and prevent a large number of potential candidates or parties from participating. Australia Score 10 The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) is an independent statutory authority that oversees the registration of candidates and parties according to the registration provisions of Part XI of the Commonwealth Electoral Act. The AEC is accountable for the conduct of elections to a cross-party parliamentary committee, the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (JSCEM). JSCEM inquiries into and reports on any issues relating to electoral laws and practices and their administration. There are no significant barriers to registration for any potential candidate or party. A party requires a minimum of 500 members who are on the electoral roll. A candidate for a federal election must be an Australian citizen, at least 18 years old and must not be serving a prison sentence of 12 months or more, or be an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP/INE: Election Campaign Regulations in 18 Latin American
    ELECTORAL STUDIES IN COMPARED INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE Election Campaign Regulations in 18 Latin American Countries ELECTORAL STUDIES IN COMPARED INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE Concept and development of the series: Carlos Navarro Fierro In collaboration with: Julia Almaraz Anaya Mariana Sánchez Rodríguez Alejandra Robles Rios José Luis Escutia Design: José Luis Escutia Acknowledgements: This English edition was made possible through a collaboration agreement between the National Electoral Institute (INE) of Mexico and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Special thanks go to Aleida Ferreyra and Manuela Matzinger from UNDP for their continuous support in finalizing this undertaking. The INE and UNDP are particularly grateful to Magdalena Palencia for her detailed revision and suggestions regarding the publication. A note of thanks goes also to Marabotto Traducciones for translating the text into English and to Wendy Knerr and John Stacey who copy-edited the publication. Election Campaign Regulations in 18 Latin American Countries ELECTORAL STUDIES IN COMPARED INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ELECION CAMPAIGN REGULATIONS IN 18 LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES First edition: July, 2014 © Instituto Nacional Electoral Coordinación de Asuntos Internacionales Viaducto Tlalpan 100, Arenal Tepepan 14610, Mexico City www.ine.mx ISBN: 978-607-9218-32-4 Printed in Mexico Free distrubution. Not for sale. CONTENTS PREFACE ......................................................................... 7 I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Voting from Abroad
    Voting from Abroad The International IDEA Handbook Voting from Abroad The International IDEA Handbook Lead Writers Contributors Andrew Ellis Alan Wall Luis Arias Núñez Carlos Navarro Arlinda Chantre Manuel Carrillo Isabel Morales Brett Lacy Marina Costa Lobo Maria Gratschew Catinca Slavu Nada Hadzimehic Nadja Braun Dieter Nohlen Nuias Silva Epp Maaten Nydia Restrepo de Acosta Florian Grotz Ozias Tungwarara Graham Hassall Pasquale Lupoli Jacobo Hernández Cruz Patrick Molutsi Jeff Fischer Phil Green Jon Fraenkel Reginald Austin Judy Thompson Richard Vengroff Kåre Vollan Simon-Pierre Nanitelamio Leticia Calderón Stina Larserud Linda Edgeworth Handbook Series The International IDEA Handbook Series seeks to present comparative analysis, information and insights on a range of democratic institutions and processes. Handbooks are aimed primarily at policy makers, politicians, civil society actors and practitioners in the field. They are also of interest to academia, the democracy assistance community and other bodies. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the view of International IDEA, the Federal Electoral Institute of Mexico, or their respective executive boards, governing bodies, and/or member states. This Handbook is independent of specific national or political interests. It is the result of a collaborative effort by these institutions and the work of prominent experts in the field of elections. © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2007 © The Federal Electoral Institute of Mexico 2007
    [Show full text]
  • Elections During Covid-19 Mitigation Measures for Parliamentary Elections in Albania
    ELECTIONS DURING COVID-19 MITIGATION MEASURES FOR PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN ALBANIA Developed by Saniela Xhaferi December 2020 This document was produced as part of the alumni initiatives of the Academy of Political Studies with the support of the Council of Europe. The opinions, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the supporting organization. Introduction Albania will held the parliamentary election in April 25, 2021. Elections in Albania continue to be held in a climate of political standoff and polarisation which undermine public confidence in the legitimacy of their votes. This elections will constitute an additional challenge for government and electoral management body as it will be organized under the COVID-19 measures to contain the virus, which have both constitutional and technical implications for the timing and administration of elections all over the world. As of November 23, 2020, there have been 67 countries and 8 territories that have decided to postpone electoral events due to COVID-19. Electoral processes held under normal circumstances entail a degree of risk to both voters and poll workers. During extraordinary times, such as responding to a new and unfamiliar pandemic, the guidance issued by national public health authorities on the movement of people should inform the decisions taken by governments and electoral management bodies (EMBs) to either postpone or hold an election. Consideration should also be given to the safe conduct of activities throughout the entire electoral cycle (voter registration, staff recruitment and training, candidate nomination, political campaigning, procurement and electoral dispute resolution).
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Charter of the Inter-American
    INTER-AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Center for Electoral Assistance and Promotion Inter-American Union of Electoral Organization - UNIORE- WORKING PAPERS FOR THE EXTRAORDINARY MEETING OF UNIORE IN PANAMA NOVEMBER 6 AND 7, 2013 IIHR/CAPEL EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT November 2013 1 INTRODUCTION Documents in this dossier are those produced and sent to the Executive Secretariat since the UNIORE Working Group meeting in Mexico (Mexico City, 13-14 July 2011), followed by the Extraordinary UNIORE Meeting in Mexico City (November 10-11, 2011), the XI UNIORE Conference in Dominican Republic (Punta Cana, July 29-August 3, 2012) and the Extraordinary Meetings of UNIORE in Ecuador (Quito, February 13, 2013) and (Cuenca, June, 2013). UNIORE’s Executive Secretariat has compiled the documents received aimed at sending them to all the members timely, in order for you to have all the information regarding the topics the next Extraordinary Meeting will deal with, and in doing so complying with the request of the Extended Coordination and Follow-up Committee. The documents are grouped following the order of the proposed agenda and despite they are subdivided with numbers, they follow a consecutive alphabetical order. 2 INDEX General Documents 1. A. Founding Charter of UNIORE .............................................................................................. 5 1. B. Agreements of the XI Conference of UNIORE in Dominican Republic, July 2012 ............. 15 1. C Agreements of the Extraordinary Meeting of UNIORE in Ecuador, February 2013 ... ......20 1. D Agreements of the Extraordinary Meeting of UNIORE in Ecuador, June 2013 ............ ......31 Proposals with functions clarification in the framework of UNIORE 2. D. Electoral Tribunal of Panama ........................................................................................... 44 General observations to documents filed in the Extraordinary Meeting of UNIORE in Ecuador, February 2013 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Democracy
    Direct Democracy The International IDEA Handbook Direct Democracy The International IDEA Handbook Lead Writers and Editors Contributors Virginia Beramendi Jennifer Somalie Angeyo Andrew Ellis Nadja Braun Bruno Kaufman Mugyenyi Silver Byanyima Miriam Kornblith Algis Krupavicius Larry LeDuc Humberto de la Calle Lombana Paddy McGuire Krisztina Medve Theo Schiller Alfred Lock Okello Oryem Palle Svensson Rodolfo Gonzáles Rissotto Daniel Zovatto Handbook Series The International IDEA Handbook Series seeks to present comparative analysis, information and insights on a range of democratic institutions and processes. Handbooks are aimed primarily at policy makers, politicians, civil society actors and practitioners in the field. They are also of interest to academia, the democracy assistance community and other bodies. © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2008 International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. The map presented in this publication does not imply on the part of the Institute any judgement on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement of such boundaries, nor does the placement or size of any country or territory reflect the political view of the Institute. The map is created for this publication in order to add clarity to the text. Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: International IDEA SE -103 34 Stockholm Sweden International IDEA encourages dissemination of its work and will promptly respond to requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications.
    [Show full text]
  • VOTER TURNOUT Since 1945
    VT_Inlay.qxp.1 02 02 11 14.50 Sida 1 VOTER TURNOUT since 1945 A Global Report VT_Inlay.qxp.1 02 02 11 14.50 Sida 2 VT_Inlay.qxp.1 02 02 11 14.50 Sida 3 VOTER TURNOUT since 1945 Rafael López Pintor Maria Gratschew with Jamal Adimi, Julie Ballington, Craig Brians, Sergei Lounev, Dieter Nohlen, Pippa Norris, Smita Notosusanto, Kate Sullivan, Edmundo Urrutia A Global Report VT_Inlay.qxp.1 02 02 11 14.50 Sida 4 Voter Turnout Since 1945 A Global Report © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) 2002 All rights reserved. This is the third book in the voter turnout series, previously entitled Voter Turnout from 1945 to 1997: a Global Report on Political Participation. Applications for permission to reproduce all or any part of this publication should be made to: Publications Officer, International IDEA, SE -103 34 Stockholm, Sweden. International IDEA encourages dissemination of its work and will respond promptly to requests for permission for reproduction or translation. This is an International IDEA publica- tion. International IDEA’s publications are not a reflection of specific national or political inter- ests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA’s Board or Council members. Maps created for this publication in order to add clarity to the text do not imply any judgement on the part of the Institute on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement of any boundaries, nor does the placement or size of any country or territory reflect a political view of the Institute.
    [Show full text]