DOCSLIB.ORG

A B Figure S1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A B Figure S1 A B Figure S1 A B Share No Share 1 or more Share No Share 1 or more Indications Indications Indications Indications C D Share No Share 1 or more Share No Share 1 or more Indications Indications Indications Indications E F Share No Share 1 or more Share No Share 1 or more Indications Indications Indications Indications G H Share No Share 1 or more Share No Share 1 or more Indications Indications Indications Indications Figure S2 A B Share No Share 1 or more Share No Share 1 or more Indications Indications Indications Indications C Share No Share 1 or more Indications Indications Figure S3 A B Share No Share 1 or more Share No Share 1 or more Indications Indications Indications Indications C Share No Share 1 or more Indications Indications Figure S4 A Share No Share 1 or more Indications Indications Figure S5 A Precision−Recall − P: 23840, N: 1299623 1.0 0.8 0.6 CATNIP AUPRC = 0.189 Precision Random AUPRC = 0.0184 0.4 AUPRC = 0.189 AUPRC Rand = 0.0184 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Recall Figure S6 Mental Disorder Skin Cancer Lung Cancer A B C Percent of Drugs in Percent of Drugs in Percent of Drugs in Class Approved for Class Approved for Class Approved for Indication Indication Indication Location Shift Location Shift Location Shift Breast Cancer Thryoid Cancer Large Intestine Cancer D E F Percent of Drugs in Percent of Drugs in Percent of Drugs in Class Approved for Class Approved for Class Approved for Indication Indication Indication Location Shift Location Shift Location Shift Upper Aerodigestive tract Cancer Gastric Cancer Renal Cancer G H I Percent of Drugs in Class Approved for Percent of Drugs in Percent of Drugs in Indication Class Approved for Class Approved for Indication Indication Location Shift Location Shift Location Shift Figure S7 Urinary Tract Cancer Endometrium Cancer A B Pleura Cancer C Percent of Drugs in Percent of Drugs in Class Approved for Percent of Drugs in Class Approved for Indication Class Approved for Indication Indication Location Shift Location Shift Location Shift Ovarian Cancer Bone Cancer D E Pancreatic Cancer F Percent of Drugs in Percent of Drugs in Percent of Drugs in Class Approved for Class Approved for Class Approved for Indication Indication Indication Location Shift Location Shift Location Shift Oesophagus Cancer Lymphoma/Leukemia Autonomic Ganglia Cancer G H I Percent of Drugs in Percent of Drugs in Class Approved for Percent of Drugs in Class Approved for Indication Class Approved for Indication Indication Location Shift Location Shift Location Shift Figure S8 A Drug Pair Types Kinase Inhibitor & Drug approved for disease Kinase Inhibitor & Drug not approved for disease A Drug Pair Types Dopamine Antagonist & Drug approved for disease Dopamine Antagonist & Drug not approved for disease Figure S9 A Benzatropine & Trimipramine Rotigotine & Trimipramine CATNIP Score CATNIP Dierence in Dierence Figure S10 A 20 B 6 15 4 10 Overlap of Shared kegg Overlap Overlap of Shared reactome Overlap 2 5 0 0 METIXENE ● ● ● BENZATROPINE ● ● BENZATROPINE ● ● ● ATROPINE ● ● ATROPINE ● ● ● ● METIXENE ● ● PERGOLIDE ● ● ● PERGOLIDE ● ● AMITRIPTYLINE ● ● ● ● ● ● ● AMITRIPTYLINE ● ● ● ● 40 30 20 10 0 9 6 3 0 Set Size Set Size C D 40 15 30 10 20 Overlap of Shared mf Overlap Overlap of Shared reactome Overlap 5 10 0 0 METIXENE ● ● ● ● GLICLAZIDE ● PERGOLIDE ● ● ● ● ● ATROPINE ● ● ● ● ● ● ● BENZATROPINE ● ● ● ● ● VANDETANIB ● ● AMITRIPTYLINE ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 100 75 50 25 0 20 15 10 5 0 Set Size Set Size E F 30 15 20 10 Overlap of Shared mf Overlap Overlap of Shared kegg Overlap 10 5 0 0 GLICLAZIDE ● GLICLAZIDE ● VANDETANIB ● ● VANDETANIB ● ● 25 20 15 10 5 0 40 20 0 Set Size Set Size Figure S10 Table S1 Table S2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The National Drugs List
    ^ ^ ^ ^ ^[ ^ The National Drugs List Of Syrian Arab Republic Sexth Edition 2006 ! " # "$ % &'() " # * +$, -. / & 0 /+12 3 4" 5 "$ . "$ 67"5,) 0 " /! !2 4? @ % 88 9 3: " # "$ ;+<=2 – G# H H2 I) – 6( – 65 : A B C "5 : , D )* . J!* HK"3 H"$ T ) 4 B K<) +$ LMA N O 3 4P<B &Q / RS ) H< C4VH /430 / 1988 V W* < C A GQ ") 4V / 1000 / C4VH /820 / 2001 V XX K<# C ,V /500 / 1992 V "!X V /946 / 2004 V Z < C V /914 / 2003 V ) < ] +$, [2 / ,) @# @ S%Q2 J"= [ &<\ @ +$ LMA 1 O \ . S X '( ^ & M_ `AB @ &' 3 4" + @ V= 4 )\ " : N " # "$ 6 ) G" 3Q + a C G /<"B d3: C K7 e , fM 4 Q b"$ " < $\ c"7: 5) G . HHH3Q J # Hg ' V"h 6< G* H5 !" # $%" & $' ,* ( )* + 2 ا اوا ادو +% 5 j 2 i1 6 B J' 6<X " 6"[ i2 "$ "< * i3 10 6 i4 11 6! ^ i5 13 6<X "!# * i6 15 7 G!, 6 - k 24"$d dl ?K V *4V h 63[46 ' i8 19 Adl 20 "( 2 i9 20 G Q) 6 i10 20 a 6 m[, 6 i11 21 ?K V $n i12 21 "% * i13 23 b+ 6 i14 23 oe C * i15 24 !, 2 6\ i16 25 C V pq * i17 26 ( S 6) 1, ++ &"r i19 3 +% 27 G 6 ""% i19 28 ^ Ks 2 i20 31 % Ks 2 i21 32 s * i22 35 " " * i23 37 "$ * i24 38 6" i25 39 V t h Gu* v!* 2 i26 39 ( 2 i27 40 B w< Ks 2 i28 40 d C &"r i29 42 "' 6 i30 42 " * i31 42 ":< * i32 5 ./ 0" -33 4 : ANAESTHETICS $ 1 2 -1 :GENERAL ANAESTHETICS AND OXYGEN 4 $1 2 2- ATRACURIUM BESYLATE DROPERIDOL ETHER FENTANYL HALOTHANE ISOFLURANE KETAMINE HCL NITROUS OXIDE OXYGEN PROPOFOL REMIFENTANIL SEVOFLURANE SUFENTANIL THIOPENTAL :LOCAL ANAESTHETICS !67$1 2 -5 AMYLEINE HCL=AMYLOCAINE ARTICAINE BENZOCAINE BUPIVACAINE CINCHOCAINE LIDOCAINE MEPIVACAINE OXETHAZAINE PRAMOXINE PRILOCAINE PREOPERATIVE MEDICATION & SEDATION FOR 9*: ;< " 2 -8 : : SHORT -TERM PROCEDURES ATROPINE DIAZEPAM INJ.
    [Show full text]
  • Upregulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Α And
    Upregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α and the lipid metabolism pathway promotes carcinogenesis of ampullary cancer Chih-Yang Wang, Ying-Jui Chao, Yi-Ling Chen, Tzu-Wen Wang, Nam Nhut Phan, Hui-Ping Hsu, Yan-Shen Shan, Ming-Derg Lai 1 Supplementary Table 1. Demographics and clinical outcomes of five patients with ampullary cancer Time of Tumor Time to Age Differentia survival/ Sex Staging size Morphology Recurrence recurrence Condition (years) tion expired (cm) (months) (months) T2N0, 51 F 211 Polypoid Unknown No -- Survived 193 stage Ib T2N0, 2.41.5 58 F Mixed Good Yes 14 Expired 17 stage Ib 0.6 T3N0, 4.53.5 68 M Polypoid Good No -- Survived 162 stage IIA 1.2 T3N0, 66 M 110.8 Ulcerative Good Yes 64 Expired 227 stage IIA T3N0, 60 M 21.81 Mixed Moderate Yes 5.6 Expired 16.7 stage IIA 2 Supplementary Table 2. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of an ampullary cancer microarray using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). This table contains only pathways with p values that ranged 0.0001~0.05. KEGG Pathway p value Genes Pentose and 1.50E-04 UGT1A6, CRYL1, UGT1A8, AKR1B1, UGT2B11, UGT2A3, glucuronate UGT2B10, UGT2B7, XYLB interconversions Drug metabolism 1.63E-04 CYP3A4, XDH, UGT1A6, CYP3A5, CES2, CYP3A7, UGT1A8, NAT2, UGT2B11, DPYD, UGT2A3, UGT2B10, UGT2B7 Maturity-onset 2.43E-04 HNF1A, HNF4A, SLC2A2, PKLR, NEUROD1, HNF4G, diabetes of the PDX1, NR5A2, NKX2-2 young Starch and sucrose 6.03E-04 GBA3, UGT1A6, G6PC, UGT1A8, ENPP3, MGAM, SI, metabolism
    [Show full text]
  • Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor
    mAChR Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor mAChRs (muscarinic acetylcholine receptors) are acetylcholine receptors that form G protein-receptor complexes in the cell membranes of certainneurons and other cells. They play several roles, including acting as the main end-receptor stimulated by acetylcholine released from postganglionic fibersin the parasympathetic nervous system. mAChRs are named as such because they are more sensitive to muscarine than to nicotine. Their counterparts are nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), receptor ion channels that are also important in the autonomic nervous system. Many drugs and other substances (for example pilocarpineand scopolamine) manipulate these two distinct receptors by acting as selective agonists or antagonists. Acetylcholine (ACh) is a neurotransmitter found extensively in the brain and the autonomic ganglia. www.MedChemExpress.com 1 mAChR Inhibitors & Modulators (+)-Cevimeline hydrochloride hemihydrate (-)-Cevimeline hydrochloride hemihydrate Cat. No.: HY-76772A Cat. No.: HY-76772B Bioactivity: Cevimeline hydrochloride hemihydrate, a novel muscarinic Bioactivity: Cevimeline hydrochloride hemihydrate, a novel muscarinic receptor agonist, is a candidate therapeutic drug for receptor agonist, is a candidate therapeutic drug for xerostomia in Sjogren's syndrome. IC50 value: Target: mAChR xerostomia in Sjogren's syndrome. IC50 value: Target: mAChR The general pharmacol. properties of this drug on the The general pharmacol. properties of this drug on the gastrointestinal, urinary, and reproductive systems and other… gastrointestinal, urinary, and reproductive systems and other… Purity: >98% Purity: >98% Clinical Data: No Development Reported Clinical Data: No Development Reported Size: 10mM x 1mL in DMSO, Size: 10mM x 1mL in DMSO, 1 mg, 5 mg 1 mg, 5 mg AC260584 Aclidinium Bromide Cat. No.: HY-100336 (LAS 34273; LAS-W 330) Cat.
    [Show full text]
  • The In¯Uence of Medication on Erectile Function
    International Journal of Impotence Research (1997) 9, 17±26 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/97 $12.00 The in¯uence of medication on erectile function W Meinhardt1, RF Kropman2, P Vermeij3, AAB Lycklama aÁ Nijeholt4 and J Zwartendijk4 1Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Leyenburg Hospital, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague, The Netherlands; 3Pharmacy; and 4Department of Urology, Leiden University Hospital, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands Keywords: impotence; side-effect; antipsychotic; antihypertensive; physiology; erectile function Introduction stopped their antihypertensive treatment over a ®ve year period, because of side-effects on sexual function.5 In the drug registration procedures sexual Several physiological mechanisms are involved in function is not a major issue. This means that erectile function. A negative in¯uence of prescrip- knowledge of the problem is mainly dependent on tion-drugs on these mechanisms will not always case reports and the lists from side effect registries.6±8 come to the attention of the clinician, whereas a Another way of looking at the problem is drug causing priapism will rarely escape the atten- combining available data on mechanisms of action tion. of drugs with the knowledge of the physiological When erectile function is in¯uenced in a negative mechanisms involved in erectile function. The way compensation may occur. For example, age- advantage of this approach is that remedies may related penile sensory disorders may be compen- evolve from it. sated for by extra stimulation.1 Diminished in¯ux of In this paper we will discuss the subject in the blood will lead to a slower onset of the erection, but following order: may be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial: Efficacy of Donepezil Against
    BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003533 on 25 September 2013. Downloaded from Open Access Protocol Protocol for a randomised controlled trial: efficacy of donepezil against psychosis in Parkinson’s disease (EDAP) Hideyuki Sawada, Tomoko Oeda To cite: Sawada H, Oeda T. ABSTRACT ARTICLE SUMMARY Protocol for a randomised Introduction: Psychosis, including hallucinations and controlled trial: efficacy of delusions, is one of the important non-motor problems donepezil against psychosis Strengths and limitations of this study in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and is in Parkinson’s disease ▪ In previous randomised controlled trials for (EDAP). BMJ Open 2013;3: possibly associated with cholinergic neuronal psychosis the efficacy was investigated in patients e003533. doi:10.1136/ degeneration. The EDAP (Efficacy of Donepezil against who presented with psychosis and the primary bmjopen-2013-003533 Psychosis in PD) study will evaluate the efficacy of endpoint was improvement of psychotic symp- donepezil, a brain acetylcholine esterase inhibitor, for toms. By comparison, this study is designed to prevention of psychosis in PD. ▸ Prepublication history for evaluate the prophylactic effect in patients this paper is available online. Methods and analysis: Psychosis is assessed every without current psychosis. Because psychosis To view these files please 4 weeks using the Parkinson Psychosis Questionnaire may be overlooked and underestimated it is visit the journal online (PPQ) and patients with PD whose PPQ-B score assessed using a questionnaire, Parkinson (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ (hallucinations) and PPQ-C score (delusions) have Psychosis Questionnaire (PPQ) every 4 weeks. bmjopen-2013-003533). been zero for 8 weeks before enrolment are ▪ The strength of this study is its prospective randomised to two arms: patients receiving donepezil design using the preset definition of psychosis Received 3 July 2013 hydrochloride or patients receiving placebo.
    [Show full text]
  • Zebrafish Behavioral Profiling Links Drugs to Biological Targets and Rest/Wake Regulation
    www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/327/5963/348/DC1 Supporting Online Material for Zebrafish Behavioral Profiling Links Drugs to Biological Targets and Rest/Wake Regulation Jason Rihel,* David A. Prober, Anthony Arvanites, Kelvin Lam, Steven Zimmerman, Sumin Jang, Stephen J. Haggarty, David Kokel, Lee L. Rubin, Randall T. Peterson, Alexander F. Schier* *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] (A.F.S.); [email protected] (J.R.) Published 15 January 2010, Science 327, 348 (2010) DOI: 10.1126/science.1183090 This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S18 Table S1 References Supporting Online Material Table of Contents Materials and Methods, pages 2-4 Supplemental Text 1-7, pages 5-10 Text 1. Psychotropic Drug Discovery, page 5 Text 2. Dose, pages 5-6 Text 3. Therapeutic Classes of Drugs Induce Correlated Behaviors, page 6 Text 4. Polypharmacology, pages 6-7 Text 5. Pharmacological Conservation, pages 7-9 Text 6. Non-overlapping Regulation of Rest/Wake States, page 9 Text 7. High Throughput Behavioral Screening in Practice, page 10 Supplemental Figure Legends, pages 11-14 Figure S1. Expanded hierarchical clustering analysis, pages 15-18 Figure S2. Hierarchical and k-means clustering yield similar cluster architectures, page 19 Figure S3. Expanded k-means clustergram, pages 20-23 Figure S4. Behavioral fingerprints are stable across a range of doses, page 24 Figure S5. Compounds that share biological targets have highly correlated behavioral fingerprints, page 25 Figure S6. Examples of compounds that share biological targets and/or structural similarity that give similar behavioral profiles, page 26 Figure S7.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D. Study Characteristics
    Appendix D. Study Characteristics Table D1. Study characteristics Participant Author Study Study Characteristics Treatment Characteristics Outcomes Reported Characteristics Conclusions Alacqua et al., Recruitment dates: Enrolled: 73 Treatment duration: 3 mo Benefits: NR Adverse events 2008 96 Jan 2002 to Dec 2003 Analyzed: 73 Run-in phase: No occurred frequently Completed: 50 Run-in phase duration: NR Harms: Behavioral during first 3 months Country: Italy Study design: issues, dyskinesia, of treatment with Retrospective cohort GROUP 1 Permitted drugs: NR dystonia, atypical Condition N: 2 dermatologic AE, liver antipsychotics. category: Mixed Diagnostic criteria: Age, mean±SD (range): Prohibited drugs: NR function, hepatic conditions (ADHD, DSM-IV 15.5±0.7 volume, prolactin, ASD, Males %: 50 GROUP 1 prolactin-related AE, schizophrenia- Setting: Caucasian %: NR Drug name: Clozapine sedation, sleepness, related, tics) Outpatient/community Diagnostic breakdown Dosing variability: variable total AE, weight (n): psychosis (1), Target dose (mg/day): NR change Funding: NR Inclusion criteria: (1) schizophrenia (1) Daily dose (mg/day), mean±SD ≤18 yr, (2) received an Treatment naïve (n): all (range): 150±70.1 Newcastle-Ottawa incident treatment with Inpatients (n): NR Concurrent treatments: NR Scale: 6/8 stars atypical antipsychotics First episode psychosis or SSRIs during the (n): NR GROUP 2 study period Comorbidities: NR Drug name: Olanzapine Dosing variability: variable Exclusion criteria: GROUP 2 Target dose (mg/day): NR NR N: 24 Daily dose
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Central Nervous System Active Drugs During Pregnancy
    Pharmaceuticals 2013, 6, 1221-1286; doi:10.3390/ph6101221 OPEN ACCESS pharmaceuticals ISSN 1424-8247 www.mdpi.com/journal/pharmaceuticals Review The Use of Central Nervous System Active Drugs During Pregnancy Bengt Källén 1,*, Natalia Borg 2 and Margareta Reis 3 1 Tornblad Institute, Lund University, Biskopsgatan 7, Lund SE-223 62, Sweden 2 Department of Statistics, Monitoring and Analyses, National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm SE-106 30, Sweden; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology, Linköping University, Linköping SE-581 85, Sweden; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-46-222-7536, Fax: +46-46-222-4226. Received: 1 July 2013; in revised form: 10 September 2013 / Accepted: 25 September 2013 / Published: 10 October 2013 Abstract: CNS-active drugs are used relatively often during pregnancy. Use during early pregnancy may increase the risk of a congenital malformation; use during the later part of pregnancy may be associated with preterm birth, intrauterine growth disturbances and neonatal morbidity. There is also a possibility that drug exposure can affect brain development with long-term neuropsychological harm as a result. This paper summarizes the literature on such drugs used during pregnancy: opioids, anticonvulsants, drugs used for Parkinson’s disease, neuroleptics, sedatives and hypnotics, antidepressants, psychostimulants, and some other CNS-active drugs. In addition to an overview of the literature, data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register (1996–2011) are presented. The exposure data are either based on midwife interviews towards the end of the first trimester or on linkage with a prescribed drug register.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) 11 Patent Number: 6165500
    USOO6165500A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,165,500 Cevc (45) Date of Patent: *Dec. 26, 2000 54 PREPARATION FOR THE APPLICATION OF WO 88/07362 10/1988 WIPO. AGENTS IN MINI-DROPLETS OTHER PUBLICATIONS 75 Inventor: Gregor Cevc, Heimstetten, Germany V.M. Knepp et al., “Controlled Drug Release from a Novel Liposomal Delivery System. II. Transdermal Delivery Char 73 Assignee: Idea AG, Munich, Germany acteristics” on Journal of Controlled Release 12(1990) Mar., No. 1, Amsterdam, NL, pp. 25–30. (Exhibit A). * Notice: This patent issued on a continued pros- C.E. Price, “A Review of the Factors Influencing the Pen ecution application filed under 37 CFR etration of Pesticides Through Plant Leaves” on I.C.I. Ltd., 1.53(d), and is subject to the twenty year Plant Protection Division, Jealott's Hill Research Station, patent term provisions of 35 U.S.C. Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 6EY, U.K., pp. 237-252. 154(a)(2). (Exhibit B). K. Karzel and R.K. Liedtke, “Mechanismen Transkutaner This patent is Subject to a terminal dis- Resorption” on Grandlagen/Basics, pp. 1487–1491. (Exhibit claimer. C). Michael Mezei, “Liposomes as a Skin Drug Delivery Sys 21 Appl. No.: 07/844,664 tem” 1985 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Biomedical Division), pp 345-358. (Exhibit E). 22 Filed: Apr. 8, 1992 Adrienn Gesztes and Michael Mazei, “Topical Anesthesia of 30 Foreign Application Priority Data the Skin by Liposome-Encapsulated Tetracaine” on Anesth Analg 1988; 67: pp 1079–81. (Exhibit F). Aug. 24, 1990 DE) Germany ............................... 40 26834 Harish M. Patel, "Liposomes as a Controlled-Release Sys Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceuticals As Environmental Contaminants
    PharmaceuticalsPharmaceuticals asas EnvironmentalEnvironmental Contaminants:Contaminants: anan OverviewOverview ofof thethe ScienceScience Christian G. Daughton, Ph.D. Chief, Environmental Chemistry Branch Environmental Sciences Division National Exposure Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development Environmental Protection Agency Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 [email protected] Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Why and how do drugs contaminate the environment? What might it all mean? How do we prevent it? Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada This talk presents only a cursory overview of some of the many science issues surrounding the topic of pharmaceuticals as environmental contaminants Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada A Clarification We sometimes loosely (but incorrectly) refer to drugs, medicines, medications, or pharmaceuticals as being the substances that contaminant the environment. The actual environmental contaminants, however, are the active pharmaceutical ingredients – APIs. These terms are all often used interchangeably Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Office of Research and Development Available: http://www.epa.gov/nerlesd1/chemistry/pharma/image/drawing.pdfNational
    [Show full text]
  • Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization
    No. 31874 Multilateral Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organ ization (with final act, annexes and protocol). Concluded at Marrakesh on 15 April 1994 Authentic texts: English, French and Spanish. Registered by the Director-General of the World Trade Organization, acting on behalf of the Parties, on 1 June 1995. Multilat ral Accord de Marrakech instituant l©Organisation mondiale du commerce (avec acte final, annexes et protocole). Conclu Marrakech le 15 avril 1994 Textes authentiques : anglais, français et espagnol. Enregistré par le Directeur général de l'Organisation mondiale du com merce, agissant au nom des Parties, le 1er juin 1995. Vol. 1867, 1-31874 4_________United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1995 Table of contents Table des matières Indice [Volume 1867] FINAL ACT EMBODYING THE RESULTS OF THE URUGUAY ROUND OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS ACTE FINAL REPRENANT LES RESULTATS DES NEGOCIATIONS COMMERCIALES MULTILATERALES DU CYCLE D©URUGUAY ACTA FINAL EN QUE SE INCORPOR N LOS RESULTADOS DE LA RONDA URUGUAY DE NEGOCIACIONES COMERCIALES MULTILATERALES SIGNATURES - SIGNATURES - FIRMAS MINISTERIAL DECISIONS, DECLARATIONS AND UNDERSTANDING DECISIONS, DECLARATIONS ET MEMORANDUM D©ACCORD MINISTERIELS DECISIONES, DECLARACIONES Y ENTEND MIENTO MINISTERIALES MARRAKESH AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ACCORD DE MARRAKECH INSTITUANT L©ORGANISATION MONDIALE DU COMMERCE ACUERDO DE MARRAKECH POR EL QUE SE ESTABLECE LA ORGANIZACI N MUND1AL DEL COMERCIO ANNEX 1 ANNEXE 1 ANEXO 1 ANNEX
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,980,308 B2 Horstmann Et Al
    (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,980,308 B2 Horstmann et al. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 17, 2015 (54) TRANSDERMAL PHARMACEUTICAL 5,877,173 A * 3/1999 Olney et al. ................... 514,217 PREPARATION CONTAINING ACTIVE 5,902,601 A 5/1999 Horstmann 6,193.992 B1* 2/2001 El-Rashidy et al. .......... 424/430 SUBSTANCE COMBINATIONS, FOR 2003, OO82214 A1 5, 2003 Williams TREATING PARKINSONS DISEASE 2003/01 19884 A1 6/2003 Epstein et al. 2004/OO13620 A1* 1/2004 Klose et al. ..................... 424,59 (75) Inventors: Michael Horstmann, Neuwied (DE); 2007/0225.379 A1* 9/2007 Carrara et al. ................ 514,756 Frank Theobald, Bad Breisig (DE) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (73) Assignee: LTS Lohmann Therapie-Systeme AG, CA 2 383 509 3, 2001 Andernach (DE) DE 3710966 12/1987 EP O241809 B1 8, 1990 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this EP B-04O4807 6, 1993 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 EP 1254 661 11, 2002 EP A-1 256339 10, 2003 U.S.C. 154(b) by 1785 days. FR 2788.982 8, 2000 JP S611451 12 T 1986 (21) Appl. No.: 10/568,941 JP S61186.317 8, 1986 JP A S62-249923 10, 1987 (22) PCT Filed: Aug. 14, 2004 JP A HO2-503677 11, 1990 JP AH11-506744 6, 1999 PCT/EP2004/OO9136 JP H11506462 6, 1999 (86). PCT No.: JP AH11-209271 8, 1999 JP A 2000-514053 10, 2000 S371 (c)(1), JP A 2001-398.65 2, 2001 (2), (4) Date: Feb. 21, 2006 JP 2001518058 10, 2001 JP A 2002-97137 4/2002 (87) PCT Pub.
    [Show full text]