DOCSLIB.ORG

Level Crossings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 194 and The Scottish Law Commission Discussion Paper No 143 LEVEL CROSSINGS A Joint Consultation Paper ii THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Law Commissions The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Right Honourable Lord Justice Munby (Chairman), Professor Elizabeth Cooke, Mr David Hertzell, Professor Jeremy Horder and Frances Patterson QC. The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Mr Mark Ormerod CB and its offices are at Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9LJ The Scottish Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Drummond Young (Chairman), Laura J Dunlop QC, Professor George L Gretton, Patrick Layden QC TD and Professor Hector L MacQueen. The Chief Executive of the Scottish Law Commission is Malcolm McMillan and its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. Topic of this consultation This consultation paper reviews the law relating to level crossings and makes proposals for its reform. Scope of this consultation The purpose of this consultation is to generate responses to our provisional proposals and consultation questions with a view to developing recommendations for reform of the law. Geographical scope The contents of this consultation paper refer to the law of England and Wales and the law of Scotland. Impact assessment An impact assessment is available to download from our websites: www.lawcom.gov.uk and www.scotlawcom.gov.uk Duration of the consultation We invite responses before 30 November 2010. How to respond Send your responses either – By email to: [email protected] Sarah Young, Law Commission, Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9LJ By post to: Tel: 020 3334 0279 / Fax: 020 3334 0201 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, whenever possible, you could send them to us electronically as well (for example, on CD or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format). After the consultation In the light of the responses we receive, we will decide our final recommendations and we will present them to Parliament. Code of Practice We are a signatory to the Government’s Code of Practice on Consultation and carry out our consultations in accordance with the Code criteria (set out on the next page). Freedom of information We will treat all responses as public documents in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and we may attribute comments and include a list of all respondents' names in any final report we publish. If you wish to submit a confidential response, you should contact us before sending the response. PLEASE NOTE – We will disregard automatic confidentiality statements generated by an IT system. Responses will also be shared with the Department for Transport and the Office of Rail Regulation. Availability of this consultation paper You can view/download it free of charge on our website at: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/cp194.pdf. iii CODE OF PRACTICE ON CONSULTATION THE SEVEN CONSULTATION CRITERIA Criterion 1: When to consult Formal consultation should take place at a stage when there is scope to influence the policy outcome. Criterion 2: Duration of consultation exercise Consultations should normally last for at least 12 weeks with consideration given to longer timescales where feasible and sensible Criterion 3: Clarity and scope of impact Consultation documents should be clear about the consultation process, what is being proposed, the scope to influence and the expected costs and benefits of the proposals. Criterion 4: Accessibility of consultation exercises Consultation exercises should be designed to be accessible to, and clearly targeted at, those people the exercise is intended to reach. Criterion 5: The burden of consultation Keeping the burden of consultation to a minimum is essential if consultations are to be effective and if consultees’ buy-in to the process is to be obtained. Criterion 6: Responsiveness of consultation exercises Consultation responses should be analysed carefully and clear feedback should be provided to participants following the consultation. Criterion 7: Capacity to consult Officials running consultations should seek guidance in how to run an effective consultation exercise and share what they have learned from the experience. CONSULTATION CO-ORDINATOR The Law Commission’s Consultation Co-ordinator is Phil Hodgson. You are invited to send comments to the Consultation Co-ordinator about the extent to which the criteria have been observed and any ways of improving the consultation process. Contact: Phil Hodgson, Consultation Co-ordinator, Law Commission, Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9LJ – Email: [email protected] Full details of the Gov ernment’s Code of Practice on Consultation are available on the BIS website at http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/better-regulation/consultation-guidance. iv THE LAW COMMISSION LEVEL CROSSINGS: CONSULTATION PAPER CONTENTS Table of photographs viii PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Background to the project 2 Historical context 4 Scope of the project 12 Structure of the consultation paper 21 Legislative competence 21 PART 2: SCOTLAND AND WALES: DEVOLUTION AND OTHER ISSUES 22 Introduction 22 Scotland 22 Wales 28 PART 3: DISABILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY 33 Introduction 33 Accessibility and the assessment of safety/convenience of level crossings 33 Accessibility of level crossings: disabled users 33 Accessibility of level crossings: other users 43 Concluding remarks 43 PART 4: CREATION OF LEVEL CROSSINGS 44 Introduction 44 The old system: special Acts 44 The modern system: Transport and Works Act 1992 and Transport and Works (Scotland) Act 2007 46 The modern system: private and hybrid legislation 48 The modern system: powers under town and country planning legislation 49 New level crossings on existing railway lines 50 Conclusion 50 v PART 5: THE CURRENT REGULATION OF LEVEL CROSSINGS 52 Introduction 52 Railway-specific safety provisions 52 General safety regime 57 The relationship between level crossing-specific rules and HSWA 1974 64 PART 6: CLOSURE OF LEVEL CROSSINGS 66 Introduction 66 Transport and Works Act 1992 and the Transport and Works (Scotland) Act 2007 66 The Highways Act 1980 (England and Wales) 67 Closure of private level crossings 74 PART 7: THE CASE FOR REFORM 75 Introduction 75 Aims of level crossing regulation 75 Regulatory approaches 76 Analysis: the case for reform 77 Economic modelling of level crossings 79 PART 8: SAFETY REGULATION AND CLOSURE: REFORM PROPOSALS 83 Introduction 83 Safety regulation 83 Closure 93 Other mechanisms for managing change 103 Creation of new level crossings 105 Requirements in special Acts and level crossing orders 106 Heritage and private railways 107 PART 9: PLANNING: ENGLAND AND WALES 109 Introduction 109 Overview of the spatial planning system in England and Wales 109 Individual planning decisions and level crossings 111 Planning law and funding of infrastructure improvements 114 vi PART 10: PLANNING: SCOTLAND 117 Introduction 117 Individual planning decisions and level crossings 117 Planning decisions and closure of level crossings 120 Planning law and funding of infrastructure improvements 121 PART 11: RIGHTS OF WAY AND ACCESS ISSUES: ENGLAND AND WALES 123 Introduction 123 Private rights of way over the railway 123 Public rights of way 135 Possibility of a private right of way becoming a public right of way 139 PART 12: RIGHTS OF WAY AND ACCESS ISSUES: SCOTLAND 143 Introduction 143 Private rights of way 143 Public rights of way 153 Access rights under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 161 PART 13: CRIMINAL OFFENCES 167 Introduction 167 Conduct at level crossings 168 The existing criminal law 169 Reform 177 PART 14: SIGNS AND THE HIGHWAY CODE 184 Introduction 184 Signs, lights and markings on public roads at or near level crossings 184 Signs, lights and markings on private roads at or near level crossings 186 The Highway Code 186 Issues relating to signs and the Highway Code 187 PART 15: SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS AND QUESTIONS 188 APPENDIX A: MAIN LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS 197 APPENDIX B: TABLE OF CRIMINAL OFFENCES 201 APPENDIX C: GLOSSARY 206 vii TABLE OF PHOTOGRAPHS A number of photographs are i ncluded in this consultation paper, as set out below. Page x Automatic half barrier crossing When properly used, a modern level crossing is very safe – The automatic half-barrier level crossing (AHB) at Dilston near Corbridge on the Newcastle to Carlisle line: note the flashing lights and the car correctly stopped at the white “stop” line. Photographer: Ian Britton. Page 8 Traditional level crossing on a heritage railway A traditional level crossing on a heritage railway: Blue Anchor station on the West Somerset Railway. Photographer: Adrian Copley. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Page 11 Manually controlled full barrier crossing The manually controlled (full) barrier level crossing (MCB) operated by the signalman in the adjacent signal box at Foxton station on the Hitchin to Cambridge line: note the flashing lights. Credit: Rail Accident Investigation Branch. Page 15 Level crossing in an urban setting The level crossing in a busy urban setting: the manually controlled (full) barrier level crossing operated remotely by a signalman and monitored by CCTV (MCB-CCTV) at Lincoln High Street. Photographer: Chris McKenna. Page 17 The Hixon rail crash, 1968 “The largest single risk of catastrophic train accident on Britain’s railways” – the aftermath of the collision in 1968 between an express train and a heavy road vehicle on the automatic half-barrier level crossing (AHB) at Hixon in Staffordshire. Credit: Mirrorpix. Page 22 Automatic open locally monitored level crossing The automatic open (ungated) locally monitored level crossing (AOCL) at Garve station on the Inverness to Kyle of Lochalsh line seen from the hillside.
Recommended publications
  • NR05 Oxford TWAO

    NR05 Oxford TWAO

    OFFICIAL Rule 10(2)(d) Transport and Works Act 1992 The Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006 Network Rail (Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements (Land Only)) Order 202X Report summarising consultations undertaken 1 Introduction 1.1 Network Rail Infrastructure Limited ('Network Rail') is making an application to the Secretary of State for Transport for an order under the Transport and Works Act 1992. The proposed order is termed the Network Rail (Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements (Land Only)) Order ('the Order'). 1.2 The purpose of the Order is to facilitate improved capacity and capability on the “Oxford Corridor” (Didcot North Junction to Aynho Junction) to meet the Strategic Business Plan objections for capacity enhancement and journey time improvements. As well as enhancements to rail infrastructure, improvements to highways are being undertaken as part of the works. Together, these form part of Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements ('the Project'). 1.3 The Project forms part of a package of rail enhancement schemes which deliver significant economic and strategic benefits to the wider Oxford area and the country. The enhanced infrastructure in the Oxford area will provide benefits for both freight and passenger services, as well as enable further schemes in this strategically important rail corridor including the introduction of East West Rail services in 2024. 1.4 The works comprised in the Project can be summarised as follows: • Creation of a new ‘through platform’ with improved passenger facilities. • A new station entrance on the western side of the railway. • Replacement of Botley Road Bridge with improvements to the highway, cycle and footways.
  • 25897 Chapter 19 Cover 6Mm.Indd

    25897 Chapter 19 Cover 6Mm.Indd

    Civil Aviation Act 2012 CIVIL AVIATION ACT 2012 AVIATION CIVIL CHAPTER 19 Explanatory Notes have been produced to assist in the understanding of this Act and are available separately Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail TSO PO Box 29, Norwich, NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Houses of Parliament Shop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square London SW1A 2JX £18.50 Telephone orders/General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.shop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Civil Aviation Act 2012 CHAPTER 19 CONTENTS PART 1 AIRPORTS CHAPTER 1 REGULATION OF OPERATORS OF DOMINANT AIRPORTS General duties 1 CAA’s general duty 2 Secretary of State’s general duty Prohibition 3Prohibition 4 Prohibition: exemption Dominant airports 5 Dominant areas and dominant airports 6 Market power test 7 Market power determinations 8Publication of market power determinations 9 Operators of areas 10 Operator determinations 11 Publication of operator determinations 12 Advance determinations 13 Appeals against determinations Licences 14 Application for licence ii Civil Aviation Act 2012 (c. 19) 15 Granting licence 16 Refusing to grant licence 17 Content and effect of licence Licence conditions 18 Licence conditions 19 Price control conditions 20 Conditions relating to CAA charges 21 Content and effect
  • HRA-News-160-April-2020.Pdf

    HRA-News-160-April-2020.Pdf

    April 2020 The official journal of THE HERITAGE RAILWAY ASSOCIATION Issue 160 UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE Three general managers talk about coping with lockdown New faces at the HRA! COVID-19 Advice and guidance Coal OFFERS 2020 Awards & winners update WANTS Chairman’s Briefing Dates for your Diary Dear Member, November 2020 Right now, you’re trying to see the future for your railway, or your museum, your tramway, your cliff railway. When can you reopen? 10th Autumn Seminar How will finances look? How long will it take things to get back to 11th Autumn Management Forum normal? You’re not alone. Thank goodness for the friendship and solidarity of the heritage railways movement. We’ve always been good at collaboration Inside this edition and sharing, from locomotives and rolling stock, through staff and equipment, to knowledge and ideas. I’m proud to say that the Chairman’s Briefing 2 Chief Exec’s Briefing 3 HRA has contributed to that solidarity and sharing. Today, we’re Covid -19 4 working even harder at our role of supporting all our members, Covid -19 HRA support 6 and helping you all to speak with one voice for the aid and Coal - latest news 10 consideration we’ll be needing over the weeks and months to Coal - key facts 13 come. New Faces at the HRA 14 Members News 15 We can’t help looking ahead. Many of you will be planning for a Friends Tour 16 long, dry season. And that’s wise work. But there’s also plenty of In Memoriam 17 important work to do today.
  • Devolution Decade

    Devolution Decade

    spring 2009 Production Editor: John Osmond Devolution Decade Assistant Editor: Nick Morris Associate Editors: On the face of it the verdicts we publish in this issue by leading protagonists in Geraint Talfan Davies, Rhys David the 1997 referendum on the first ten years of the National Assembly make pretty depressing reading. Professor Kevin Morgan, who chaired the Yes Campaign, is Administration: Helen Sims-Coomber, Clare Johnson especially damning. He lets us in to what he describes as “devolution’s dirty little secret”, its failure to make a fist of developing the Welsh economy. And the Design: statistics are incontrovertible. In terms of our prosperity relative to most other www.theundercard.co.uk parts of the United Kingdom, we’ve actually gone backwards in the first decade To advertise – declining from 77 to 75 per cent of the UK’s average GVA. When we started Tel: 029 2066 6606 out the Assembly Government’s stated ambition was to climb to 90 per cent by Institute of Welsh Affairs 2010, an aspiration that has been quietly dropped. One way or another our other 4 Cathedral Road contributors all point to the economy as the central reason for their Cardiff CF11 9LJ disappointment with devolution’s record so far. Tel: 029 2066 0820 Yet a narrow focus on the economy, important as it undoubtedly is, leads Email: [email protected] to a zero sum game. Devolution is about much more than that. And anyway, www.iwa.org.uk as Kevin Morgan himself concedes, the amount that government can do to The IWA is a non-aligned independent think- influence the economy will always be limited, especially a government with so tank and research institute, based in Cardiff with relatively little control over the main economic levers as the one in Cardiff Bay.
  • Transport and Works (Scotland) Act 2007 (Asp 8)

    Transport and Works (Scotland) Act 2007 (Asp 8)

    Transport and Works (Scotland) Act 2007 (asp 8) Transport and Works (Scotland) Act 2007 2007 asp 8 CONTENTS Section PART 1 ORDERS AUTHORISING WORKS ETC. Power to make orders 1 Orders as to transport systems and inland waterways 2 Subject-matter of orders under section 1 3 Crown land Procedure for making orders 4 Applications 5 Cases where other Member States are affected 6 Orders made otherwise than on application 7 Model provisions 8 Objections and representations 9 Inquiries and hearings 10 Procedure at inquiries and hearings 11 Making or refusal of orders under section 1 12 Publicity for making or refusal of order 13 “Developments of national significance” etc.: special procedure Consents etc. under other enactments 14 Consents etc. under other enactments 15 Town and country planning Miscellaneous 16 Validity of orders under section 1 17 Powers of certain bodies to apply for, or object to, order under section 1 18 Access to land 19 Acquisition of land by agreement 20 Service of notices and other documents 21 Annual report 22 Orders under the Light Railways Act 1896 23 Interpretation ii Transport and Works (Scotland) Act 2007 (asp 8) PART 2 MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS 24 Amendment of Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 25 Amendment of Harbours Act 1964 26 Amendment of Pilotage Act 1987 27 Amendment of Transport (Scotland) Act 2001 PART 3 GENERAL 28 Further provision as regards rules, regulations and orders 29 Modification and repeal of enactments 30 Short title, commencement and transitional provision __________ Schedule 1—Matters within section 1 Schedule 2—Modification of enactments Schedule 3—Repeals Transport and Works (Scotland) Act 2007 (asp 8) 1 Part 1—Orders authorising works etc.
  • Appendix C. List of Consultees

    Appendix C. List of Consultees

    Appendix C. List of Consultees C.1. Introduction C.1.1 This appendix provides a list of the organisations consulted under section 42, section 47 and section 48 of the Planning Act 2008 . C.2. Section 42(1)(a) Prescribed Consultees C.2.1 Prescribed consultees are set out under Schedule 1 of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 ; these are outlined in Appendix Table A below. Any variation from the list of organisations set out in Schedule 1 is clarified within column 3 of the table. C.2.2 The Planning Inspectorate provided a list of prescribed consultation bodies in accordance with Regulation 9(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations and Advice Note three 1 (see Appendix A ), referred to as the “Regulation 9 list”. Those consultees included in the Reg 9 list are included in Table A, B and C. Those consultees that were not previously identified as a prescribed consultee as per Schedule 1 are identified with asterisk (*), and were consulted in the same way as the Schedule 1 consultees. C.2.3 The list of parish councils consulted under section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table C. The list of statutory undertakers consulted under Section 42 (1) (a) is outlined separately in Appendix Table B . C.2.4 Organisations noted in Appendix Tables A, B and C were issued with a copy of the Section 48 notice, notifying them of the proposed application and with consultation information, including the consultation brochure and details of how to respond. Appendix Table A: Prescribed Consultees Variation from the schedule where Consultee Organisation applicable The proposed application is not likely The Welsh Ministers N/A to affect land in Wales.
  • The Chappel and Wakes Colne Light Railway Order 1994

    The Chappel and Wakes Colne Light Railway Order 1994

    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1994 No. 84 TRANSPORT The Chappel and Wakes Colne Light Railway Order 1994 Made - - - - 5th January 1994 Coming into force - - 6th January 1994 The Secretary of State for Transport, on the application of the East Anglian Railway Museum and in exercise of powers conferred by sections 7 and 9 to 12 and 18 of the Light Railways Act 1896(1) and now vested in him(2), and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Order: Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Chappel and Wakes Colne Light Railway Order 1994 and shall come into force on 6th January 1994. Interpretation 2.—(1) In this Order, unless the context otherwise requires, the following expressions have the meanings hereby respectively assigned to them: “the Board” means the British Railways Board; “the deposited plan” means the plan deposited in respect of the application for this Order with the Secretary of State for Transport; “the lease” means the lease granted by the Board on 23rd April 1991 to the Branch Line Preservation Company Limited, any extension of the said lease or any new lease of Railway No.1 granted by the Board to the Museum or the Trading Company; “the Museum” means the East Anglian Railway Museum, incorporated under the Companies Act 1985(3) and having its registered office at Chappel and Wakes Colne Station, Colchester, Essex, CO6 2DS; “the principal Act” means the Light Railways Act 1896; “the railways” means Railway No.1 or Railway No.2, or both of them, as the case may require; (1) 1896 c.
  • The Electric Telegraph

    The Electric Telegraph

    To Mark, Karen and Paul CONTENTS page ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENTS TO 1837 13 Early experiments—Francis Ronalds—Cooke and Wheatstone—successful experiment on the London & Birmingham Railway 2 `THE CORDS THAT HUNG TAWELL' 29 Use on the Great Western and Blackwall railways—the Tawell murder—incorporation of the Electric Tele- graph Company—end of the pioneering stage 3 DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE COMPANIES 46 Early difficulties—rivalry between the Electric and the Magnetic—the telegraph in London—the overhouse system—private telegraphs and the press 4 AN ANALYSIS OF THE TELEGRAPH INDUSTRY TO 1868 73 The inland network—sources of capital—the railway interest—analysis of shareholdings—instruments- working expenses—employment of women—risks of submarine telegraphy—investment rating 5 ACHIEVEMENT IN SUBMARINE TELEGRAPHY I o The first cross-Channel links—the Atlantic cable— links with India—submarine cable maintenance com- panies 6 THE CASE FOR PUBLIC ENTERPRISE 119 Background to the nationalisation debate—public attitudes—the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce— Frank Ives. Scudamore reports—comparison with continental telegraph systems 7 NATIONALISATION 1868 138 Background to the Telegraph Bill 1868—tactics of the 7 8 CONTENTS Page companies—attitudes of the press—the political situa- tion—the Select Committee of 1868—agreement with the companies 8 THE TELEGRAPH ACTS 154 Terms granted to the telegraph and railway companies under the 1868 Act—implications of the 1869 telegraph monopoly 9 THE POST OFFICE TELEGRAPH 176 The period 87o-1914—reorganisation of the
  • TECHNICAL ARTICLE the Journal April 2019 Volume 137 Part 2

    TECHNICAL ARTICLE the Journal April 2019 Volume 137 Part 2

    APRIL 2019 VOL 137 PART 2 Permanent Way Institution The Institution for Rail Infrastructure Engineers PWI Practical Trackwork Challenge GREAT CENTRAL RAILWAY LEICESTERSHIRE Richard Spoors, Malcolm Pearce and Andy Packham TECHNICAL ARTICLE PAGE 12 CALIFORNIA: FROM DOUBLE AN EXPLORATIVE CASE STUDY INNOVATIVE APPLICATION OF RAIL TRACK TO TRIPLE TRACK COLLABORATIVE WORKING AND FASTENINGS FOR HS2 INTEGRATED DATA MANAGEMENT IN TRACK RENEWAL PROJECTS AS PUBLISHED IN Page 16 Page 22 Page 42 PWI Journal APR 2019.indd 1 25/04/2019 14:41 The Journal April 2019 Volume 137 Part 2 If you would like to reproduce this article, please contact: Kerrie Illsley JOURNAL PRODUCTION EDITOR Permanent Way Institution [email protected] PLEASE NOTE THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS JOURNAL ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF THE EDITOR OR OF THE INSTITUTION AS A BODY. TECHNICAL Stobart Rail & Civils and Network Rail’s partnership delivers far reaching track improvement in the far north For the last three years, Stobart Rail & A range of interventions were delivered, approach also reduced ongoing maintenance Civils have been hard at work delivering an including replacing expired rails and requirements to deliver far-reaching whole-life innovative new approach to track maintenance sleepers, correcting track defects and many cost savings of at least £1m annually. across 300 route miles in Scotland. The other improvements that reduced future Far North Plain Line Workbank was an maintenance, enhanced safety and increased On a major site at Thurso on Scotland’s north £11m programme in some of the UK’s most passengers’ ride quality. The high standard coast, the challenge was to re-rail more challenging access and environmental of work handed back resulted in little, if any, than six miles of track during a twelve-week conditions.
  • The Transport Act 2000 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2001 No

    The Transport Act 2000 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2001 No

    Document Generated: 2017-11-19 Draft Legislation: This is a draft item of legislation. This draft has since been made as a UK Statutory Instrument: The Transport Act 2000 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2001 No. 4050 SCHEDULE Article 2 PART I CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO AVIATION Aviation Security Act 1982 1. In section 38 of the Aviation Security Act 1982(1) (interpretation etc.) in subsection (2)(b) for “the manager of an aerodrome” there shall be substituted “the person”. CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO STATUTORY AND OTHER UNDERTAKERS PART II Welsh Development Agency Act 1975 2. In section 27 of the Welsh Development Agency Act 1975 (interpretation)(2)— (a) in subsection (1) in the definition of “statutory undertakers” in paragraph (b) after “the Civil Aviation Authority,” there shall be inserted “a person who holds a licence under Chapter I of Part I of the Transport Act 2000 (to the extent that the person is carrying out activities authorised by the licence)”; and (b) after subsection (1) there shall be inserted— “(1B) The undertaking of a person who holds a licence under Chapter I of Part I of the Transport Act 2000 shall not be considered to be a statutory undertaking for the purposes of this Act except to the extent that it is the person’s undertaking as licence holder; and references in this Act to the person’s undertaking shall be construed accordingly. (1C) A person who holds a licence under Chapter I of Part I of the Transport Act 2000 shall not be considered a statutory undertaker for the purposes of section 21C above.”.
  • ASTRODYNAMICS Z^S Hovercraft

    ASTRODYNAMICS Z^S Hovercraft

    UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW Postgraduate Courses At CRANFIELD (Departments of Astronomy and Aeronautics & Fluid Mechanics) Diploma Course in Air Transport ASTRODYNAMICS Engineering Commencing October 1969 The College of Aeronautics offers a one-year Subjects of Study residential postgraduate course in Air Transport Celestial Mechanics and Astrodynamics Engineering designed for engineers and scientists of graduate standard concerned with or interested Numerical Methods and Programming in the airline industry and the transport aircraft Environmental Problems manufacturing industry. Propulsion Navigation and Stabilisation The syllabus covers the operational, engineering Re-entry Problems and economic implications of air transport together Joint Project on the Requirements of a Hypothetical Mission with the directly related aspects of systems, materials, design and propulsion. Entry requirement: Degree or equivalent in Science Full use is made of College aircraft and extensive (Astronomy, Mathematics or Physics) or Engineering. laboratory demonstration resources of all Departments to illustrate the operational aspects Duration: One Calendar Year with examination in of the subject. September 1970. Advice given on financial aid. Application forms and further information obtainable Further information and forms of application from: from The Registrar, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, The Registrar, The CoUege of Aeronautics, W2, Scotland. Cranfield, Bedford. DIRECTORATE ELECTRONICS RESEARCH AND Z^S Hovercraft DEVELOPMENT (AIR) Ministry of Technology
  • Landscape Character Assessment Ross

    Landscape Character Assessment Ross

    Landscape Character Assessment 2019 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT ROSS & CROMARTY LANDSCAPE EVOLUTION AND INFLUENCES Landscape Evolution and Influences – Ross & Cromarty 1 Landscape Character Assessment 2019 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION page 3 2. PHYSICAL INFLUENCES page 4 3. HUMAN INFLUENCES page 13 4. CULTURAL INFLUENCES AND PERCEPTION page 31 Title Page Photographs, clockwise from top left: Beallach nam Ba, Pass of the Cattle, Applecross©NatureScot The view over Ullapool and Loch Broom from the road north. ©Lorne Gill/NatureScot Slioch ©Lorne Gill/NatureScot Rigs in the Cromarty Firth. ©Rachel Haines/NatureScot This document provides information on how the landscape of the local authority area has evolved. It complements the Landscape Character Type descriptions of the 2019 dataset. The original character assessment reports, part of a series of 30, mostly for a local authority area, included a “Background Chapter” on the formation of the landscape. These documents have been revised because feedback said they are useful, despite the fact that other sources of information are now readily available on the internet, unlike in the 1990’s when the first versions were produced. The content of the chapters varied considerably between the reports, and it has been restructured into a more standard format: Introduction, Physical Influences and Human Influences for all areas; and Cultural Influences sections for the majority. Some content variation still remains as the documents have been revised rather than rewritten, The information has been updated with input from the relevant Local Authorities. The historic and cultural aspects have been reviewed and updated by Historic Environment Scotland. Gaps in information have been filled where possible.