Coleophoridae 37.001 486 Augasma Aeratella Knotgrass Case-Bearer 37.002 487 Coleophora Lutarea Stitchwort Case-Bearer 37.003

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coleophoridae 37.001 486 Augasma Aeratella Knotgrass Case-Bearer 37.002 487 Coleophora Lutarea Stitchwort Case-Bearer 37.003 Coleophoridae 37.001 486 Augasma aeratella Knotgrass Case-bearer 37.002 487 Coleophora lutarea Stitchwort Case-bearer 37.003 488 Coleophora limoniella Silver-streaked Case-bearer 37.004 489 Coleophora albella Viviparous Case-bearer 37.005 490 Coleophora lutipennella Common Oak Case-bearer 37.006 491 Coleophora gryphipennella Rose Case-bearer 37.007 492 Coleophora flavipennella Tipped Oak Case-bearer 37.009 496 Coleophora milvipennis Buff Birch Case-bearer 37.010 498 Coleophora alnifoliae Brown Alder Case-bearer 37.011 497 Coleophora badiipennella Pale Elm Case-bearer 37.012 499 Coleophora limosipennella Dark Elm Case-bearer 37.013 501 Coleophora siccifolia Grey Birch Case-bearer 37.014 494 Coleophora coracipennella Blackthorn Case-bearer 37.015 493 Coleophora serratella Common Case-bearer 37.016 495 Coleophora spinella Apple & Plum Case-bearer 37.017 494a Coleophora prunifoliae New Sloe Case-bearer 37.018 500 Coleophora hydrolapathella Water-dock Case-bearer 37.019 502 Coleophora trigeminella Scarce Thorn Case-bearer 37.022 504 Coleophora lusciniaepennella Osier Case-bearer 37.026 509 Coleophora violacea Violet Case-bearer 37.027 513 Coleophora potentillae Shaded Case-bearer 37.028 510 Coleophora juncicolella Least Case-bearer 37.029 511 Coleophora orbitella Pale Birch Case-bearer 37.030 512 Coleophora binderella Grey Alder Case-bearer 37.032 515 Coleophora albitarsella White-legged Case-bearer 37.033 516 Coleophora trifolii Large Clover Case-bearer 37.034 517a Coleophora frischella White-clover Case-bearer 37.035 517 Coleophora alcyonipennella Clover Case-bearer 37.036 521 Coleophora conyzae Spikenard Case-bearer 37.038 522 Coleophora lineolea Woundwort Case-bearer 37.039 523 Coleophora hemerobiella Black-stigma Case-bearer 37.040 524 Coleophora lithargyrinella Sandy Case-bearer 37.041 546 Coleophora genistae Petty-whin Case-bearer 37.042 545 Coleophora saturatella Broom Case-bearer 37.043 548 Coleophora niveicostella Drab Case-bearer 37.044 547 Coleophora discordella Lotus Case-bearer 37.045 528 Coleophora chalcogrammella Pointed Case-bearer 37.046 519 Coleophora deauratella Red-clover Case-bearer 37.048 518 Coleophora mayrella Meadow Case-bearer 37.049 533 Coleophora anatipennella Pistol Case-bearer 37.050 532 Coleophora albidella White Sallow Case-bearer 37.051 537 Coleophora kuehnella White Oak Case-bearer 37.052 535 Coleophora ibipennella Forest Case-bearer 37.053 536 Coleophora betulella White Birch Case-bearer 37.054 534 Coleophora currucipennella Scarce Wood Case-bearer 37.055 541 Coleophora pyrrhulipennella Ling Case-bearer 37.058 539 Coleophora conspicuella Knapweed Case-bearer 37.061 530 Coleophora lixella Downland Case-bearer 37.062 529 Coleophora tricolor Basil-thyme Case-bearer 37.063 544 Coleophora albicosta Gorse Case-bearer 37.065 549 Coleophora pennella Bugloss Case-bearer 37.066 526 Coleophora laricella Larch Case-bearer 37.069 587 Coleophora caespititiella Buff Rush Case-bearer 37.070 583 Coleophora tamesis Jointed-rush Case-bearer 37.071 582 Coleophora glaucicolella Grey Rush Case-bearer 37.072 578 Coleophora otidipennella Wood-rush Case-bearer 37.073 584 Coleophora alticolella Common Rush Case-bearer 37.074 581 Coleophora taeniipennella Small Rush Case-bearer 37.075 575 Coleophora salinella Sea-purslane Case-bearer 37.077 552 Coleophora lassella Toad-rush Case-bearer 37.078 585 Coleophora maritimella Sea-rush Case-bearer 37.081 561 Coleophora therinella Black-bindweed Case-bearer 37.082 562 Coleophora asteris Sea-aster Case-bearer 37.083 565 Coleophora saxicolella Orache Case-bearer 37.084 566 Coleophora sternipennella Speckled Case-bearer 37.085 569 Coleophora squamosella Surrey Case-bearer 37.086 568 Coleophora versurella Pale Orache Case-bearer 37.087 572 Coleophora vestianella Eastern Case-bearer 37.088 573 Coleophora atriplicis Saltmarsh Case-bearer 37.090 577 Coleophora artemisicolella Mugwort Case-bearer 37.091 574 Coleophora deviella Grey Blite Case-bearer 37.092 551 Coleophora galbulipennella Kent Case-bearer 37.093 559 Coleophora peribenanderi Pale Thistle Case-bearer 37.095 556 Coleophora trochilella Verge Case-bearer 37.096 557 Coleophora gardesanella Small Streaked Case-bearer 37.098 554 Coleophora inulae Fleabane Case-bearer 37.099 553 Coleophora striatipennella Hedge Case-bearer 37.100 525 Coleophora solitariella Ochreous Case-bearer 37.101 576 Coleophora albicans Wormwood Case-bearer 37.102 563 Coleophora argentula Yarrow Case-bearer 37.103 555 Coleophora follicularis Agrimony Case-bearer 37.104 567 Coleophora adspersella Dusted Case-bearer 37.105 550 Coleophora nutantella Campion Case-bearer 37.106 560 Coleophora paripennella Dark Thistle Case-bearer 37.107 589 Coleophora clypeiferella Body-marked Case-bearer 37.108 588 Coleophora salicorniae Glasswort Case-bearer.
Recommended publications
  • Moths in Pheromone Traps for Anarsia Lineatella Zll
    372 Acta Zoologica Lituanica, 2001, Volumen 11, Numerus 4 ISSN 1392-1657 MOTHS IN PHEROMONE TRAPS FOR ANARSIA LINEATELLA ZLL. AND PHTHORIMAEA OPERCULELLA ZLL. (GELECHIIDAE, LEPIDOP- TERA) IN LITHUANIA Henrikas OSTRAUSKAS Lithuanian State Plant Protection Service, Pelesos 85, 2014 Vilnius, Lithuania Abstract. During the 19972000 investigations the quarantine pest Phthorimaea operculella was not registered in Lithuania. During the studies undertaken in 19982000 Anarsia lineatella was caught in four new localities of two new districts Utena and Panevëþys. Moths belonging to 94 species from 17 families were caught with pheromone traps for P. operculella and A. lineatella, with species rare for Lithuania among them (Calybites phasianipennella, Phyllonorycter corylifoliella, Coleophora ibipennella, Scrobipalpa acuminatella, Scrobipalpa artemisiella, Ypsolopha horridella, Synanthedon myopaeformis, Pammene spiniana, Cydia lunulana, Cydia orobana, Mesapamea secalella, Hypena rostralis). As a result of the above studies the names of moths most frequently caught with A. lineatella and P. operculella pheromone traps have been elucidated. Also some new localities for the other nine moth species in Lithuania have been additionally distinguished and adduced in the present study. Key words: peach twig borer, Anarsia lineatella, potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella, pheromone traps, distribution, Lithuania INTRODUCTION sticky inserts for A. lineatella and for P. operculella; d) Funnel traps with moth killing strips for the potato tuber Anarsia lineatella is a rare for Lithuania moth species moth. In 2000 dispensers (ANLI) and Delta traps with which was entered into the European quarantine pest sticky inserts produced by Pherobank firm (Netherlands) list (Quarantine, 1997) and in the Checklist of were used for A. lineatella trapping. The pheromone Lithuanian Lepidoptera (Ivinskis, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Bon Echo Provincial Park
    BON ECHO PROVINCIAL PARK One Malaise trap was deployed at Bon Echo Provincial Park in 2014 (44.89405, -77.19691 278m ASL; Figure 1). This trap collected arthropods for twenty weeks from May 7 – September 24, 2014. All 10 Malaise trap samples were processed; every other sample was analyzed using the individual specimen protocol while the second half was analyzed via bulk analysis. A total of 2559 BINs were obtained. Over half the BINs captured were flies (Diptera), followed by bees, ants and wasps (Hymenoptera), moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera), and beetles (Coleoptera; Figure 2). In total, 547 arthropod species were named, representing 22.9% of the BINs from the site (Appendix 1). All BINs were assigned at least to Figure 1. Malaise trap deployed at Bon Echo family, and 57.2% were assigned to a genus (Appendix Provincial Park in 2014. 2). Specimens collected from Bon Echo represent 223 different families and 651 genera. Diptera Hymenoptera Lepidoptera Coleoptera Hemiptera Mesostigmata Trombidiformes Psocodea Sarcoptiformes Trichoptera Araneae Entomobryomorpha Symphypleona Thysanoptera Neuroptera Opiliones Mecoptera Orthoptera Plecoptera Julida Odonata Stylommatophora Figure 2. Taxonomy breakdown of BINs captured in the Malaise trap at Bon Echo. APPENDIX 1. TAXONOMY REPORT Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona obesa Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus atriceps Neriene Neriene radiata Philodromidae Philodromus Salticidae Pelegrina Pelegrina proterva Tetragnathidae Tetragnatha Tetragnatha shoshone
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Coleophora Proterella Wikström & Tabell, a New Species Belonging to C. Virgaureae Species-Complex (Lepidoptera
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Tabell, J.; Wikström, B. Coleophora proterella Wikström & Tabell, a new species belonging to C. virgaureae species-complex (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 44, núm. 173, marzo, 2016, pp. 169-174 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45545991020 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative SHILAP Revta. lepid., 44 (173) marzo 2016: 169-174 eISSN: 2340-4078 ISSN: 0300-5267 Coleophora proterella Wikström & Tabell, a new species belonging to C. virgaureae species-complex (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) J. Tabell & B. Wikström Abstract Coleophora proterella Wikström & Tabell, sp. n. is described as new. The new species belongs to the C. virgaureae species-complex. According to the genitalia structures it is closely related to C. obscenella Herrich- Schäffer, 1855, C. virgaureae Stainton, 1857, C. cinerea Toll, 1954, and according to the DNA barcode studies the closest species is C. squamosella Stainton, 1856. Photographs of the adult, genitalia and larval case of the new taxon are provided and the known distribution range is given. KEY WORDS: Lepidoptera, Coleophoridae, Coleophora proterella, Coleophora virgaureae species-complex, DNA, new species. Coleophora proterella Wikström & Tabell, una nueva especie que pertenece al complejo de especies de C. virgaureae (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae) Resumen Coleophora proterella Wikström & Tabell, sp. n.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    732 _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 7, No. 2, June 2012__________ STRUCTURE OF LEPIDOPTEROCENOSES ON OAKS QUERCUS DALECHAMPII AND Q. CERRIS IN CENTRAL EUROPE AND ESTIMATION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT SPECIES Miroslav Kulfan* * Department of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina B-1, SK-84215 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. E-mail: [email protected] [Kulfan, M. 2012. Structure of lepidopterocenoses on oaks Quercus dalechampii and Q. cerris in Central Europe and estimation of the most important species. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 7 (2): 732-741] ABSTRACT: On the basis of lepidopterous larvae a total of 96 species on Quercus dalechampii and 58 species on Q. cerris were recorded in 10 study plots of Malé Karpaty and Trnavská pahorkatina hills. The families Geometridae, Noctuidae and Tortricidae encompassed the highest number of found species. The most recorded species belonged to the trophic group of generalists. On the basis of total abundance of lepidopterous larvae found on Q. dalechampii from all the study plots the most abundant species was evidently Operophtera brumata. The most abundant species on Q. cerris was Cyclophora ruficiliaria. Based on estimated oak leaf area consumed by a larva it is shown that Lymantria dispar was the most important leaf-chewing species of both Q. dalechampii and Q. cerris. KEY WORDS: Slovakia, Quercus dalechampii, Q. cerris, the most important species. About 300 Lepidoptera species are known to damage the assimilation tissue of oaks in Central Europe (Patočka, 1954, 1980; Patočka et al.1999; Reiprich, 2001). Lepidoptera larvae are shown to be the most important group of oak defoliators (Patočka et al., 1962, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Lepidopteran Seasonal Guilds Differ on Some Oaks (Quercus Spp.) – a Case Study
    JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 55, 2009 (12): 578–590 How do lepidopteran seasonal guilds differ on some oaks (Quercus spp.) – A case study † M. Turčáni1, J. Patočka1 , M. Kulfan2 1 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 2Department of Zoology, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, Bratislava, Slovakia ABSTRACT: The differences between oak lepidopteran communities were studied in Slovakia in 1993 and 1994. Sampling was undertaken between April and October on 3 oak species (Quercus robur, Q. petraea, Q. rubra). Biologi- cal traits of larvae were examined in order to explain differences in seasonal guilds among oaks. Communities varied in structure and abundance. Species richness in four seasonal guilds (flush, late spring, summer and autumn feeders) had a similar pattern on each of the studied oak species. The guild of flush feeders had the richest species assemblage, followed by the late spring feeder guild and both guilds were significantly richer than the summer feeder guild and autumn feeder guild. Keywords: lepidopteran larvae communities; Slovakia; oaks; seasonal guilds Oaks (Quercus spp.) are represented in Slovakia dant defoliators: Lymantria dispar, Operophtera (Central Europe) by eight native and one introduced brumata, Erannis defoliaria, Tortrix viridana, Aleim- species; they are distributed in the warmest part ma loeflingiana, Archips xylosteana and several of the country from an altitude of about 100 m up others. The occurrence of outbreaks was used as an to 1,000 m a.s.l. More than 250 lepidopteran spe- indicator of habitat preference (the outbreak is de- cies have been recorded feeding on Quercus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera) Bývalého Vojenského Prostoru U Oleška (Česká Republika, Ústecký Kraj)
    Published September 15, 2010 Klapalekiana, 46: 69–130, 2010 ISSN 1210-6100 Motýli (Lepidoptera) bývalého vojenského prostoru u Oleška (Česká republika, Ústecký kraj) Butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) of the former military training area near Oleško (Czech Republic, Ústí Region) Jan ŠumpICH 582 61 Česká Bělá 212, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Lepidoptera, ecofaunistics, species diversity, sand habitats, Czech Republic, Central Europe Abstract. The lepidopteran fauna of the former military training area near Oleško (Czech Republic: Ústecký Region) was studied in the year 2008. This area is on sandy ground, the predominant habitats are dry Scots pine forests growing on sand. 700 species were recorded, many of them are markedly psammophilous. Some characteristic spe- cies are very abundant there, namely on open habitats Aroga velocella (Zeller, 1839), Teleiopsis diffinis (Haworth, 1828), Platytes alpinellus (Hübner, 1813), Pyrausta ostrinalis (Hübner, 1796), Paradrina selini (Boisduval, 1840), Agrotis vestigialis (Hufnagel, 1766), Eilema pygmaeolum (Doubleday, 1847)���������������������������������������, some other species were only recorded individually (Aristotelia brizella (Treitschke, 1833), Helcystogramma lineolellum (Zeller, 1839), Pediasia fasce- linella (Hübner, 1813), Lythria cruentaria (Hufnagel, 1767) and Hadena irregularis (Hufnagel, 1766)). Elatobia fuliginosella (Lienig et Zeller, 1846), Decantha borkhausenii (Zeller, 1839), Epinotia rubiginosana (Herrich- Schäffer, 1851), Cydia conicolana (Heylaerts, 1874)
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 19(5) 2020, 129–142 https://czasopisma.up.lublin.pl/index.php/asphc ISSN 1644-0692 e-ISSN 2545-1405 DOI: 10.24326/asphc.2020.5.13 ORIGINAL PAPER Accepted: 28.11.2019 THE EFFECT OF VEGETATION IN APPLE ORCHARD EDGES ON THE PHENOLOGY OF PARASITOIDS FROM THE SUBFAMILY Pimplinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Hanna Piekarska-Boniecka1, Joanna Zyprych-Walczak2 , Idzi Siatkowski2, Tadeusz Barczak3 1 Department of Entomology and Environmental Protection, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, Poland 2 Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland 3 Department of Biology and Animal Environment, University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, Hetmańska 33, 85-039 Bydgoszcz, Poland ABSTRACT Wild vegetation neighbouring orchards may be a factor attracting imagines of parasitoids from the subfam- ily Pimplinae into fruit tree plantations and thus increase both their species diversity and population size in this habitat. For this reason in the years 2008–2010 a study was initiated on the phenology of 8 dominant Pimplinae species in apple orchards and on their edges, which included shrubberies and roadside avenues of trees and shrubs. Slightly higher numbers of Pimplinae were recorded in orchards compared to their edges. At strong correlation was observed between the counts of Pimplinae in both habitats. The preference of selec- tion of orchards by Pimplinae was observed in the autumn period, while no such preference was found in the spring or summer months. Analyses showed that flowering plants in the orchard edges such asTilia cordata, Symphoricarpos albus, Cirsium arvense and Galium aparine may have attracted Pimplinae to the orchards.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002
    Lepidoptera in Cheshire in 2002 A Report on the Micro-Moths, Butterflies and Macro-Moths of VC58 S.H. Hind, S. McWilliam, B.T. Shaw, S. Farrell and A. Wander Lancashire & Cheshire Entomological Society November 2003 1 1. Introduction Welcome to the 2002 report on lepidoptera in VC58 (Cheshire). This is the second report to appear in 2003 and follows on from the release of the 2001 version earlier this year. Hopefully we are now on course to return to an annual report, with the 2003 report planned for the middle of next year. Plans for the ‘Atlas of Lepidoptera in VC58’ continue apace. We had hoped to produce a further update to the Atlas but this report is already quite a large document. We will, therefore produce a supplementary report on the Pug Moths recorded in VC58 sometime in early 2004, hopefully in time to be sent out with the next newsletter. As usual, we have produced a combined report covering micro-moths, macro- moths and butterflies, rather than separate reports on all three groups. Doubtless observers will turn first to the group they are most interested in, but please take the time to read the other sections. Hopefully you will find something of interest. Many thanks to all recorders who have already submitted records for 2002. Without your efforts this report would not be possible. Please keep the records coming! This request also most definitely applies to recorders who have not sent in records for 2002 or even earlier. It is never too late to send in historic records as they will all be included within the above-mentioned Atlas when this is produced.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Fauna of Casebearers from the Centre of the European Part of Russia (Lepidoptera, Coleophoridae) by V a S S Il Y V
    Atalanta (Juli 2004) 35(1/2): 133-140, Wurzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 On the fauna of casebearers from the centre of the European part of Russia (Lepidoptera, Coleophoridae) by V a s s il y V. A n ik in & Ir in a V. S h m yto v a received 30.1.2004 Abstract: 47 species of the casebearers (Lepidoptera, Coleophoridae) are recorded from the centre of the European part of Russia. The first investigation in the Lepidoptera from the centre of the European part of Russia was made about 200 years ago. Inspite of it the fauna of Coleophoridae of this territory still has been almost completely unknown until present time. In the course of our study, collections were made from 1984 to 1999 in some parts of Kaluga, Smolensk, Oryel provinces (I. V. Shmytova leg.) and Tula province (L. V. Bolshakov, C. A. Rjabov, A. F. Lakomov leg.). This territory is mainly composed of forest as well as forest-steppe zones (fig. 1). Kaluga, Smolensk and some regions of Tula provinces are typical for the occurence of coniferous (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), broad-leaved (Quercus robur L., Ulmus L, Tilia cordata Mill., Fraxinus excel­ sior L.) and small-leaved forests (Betula L., Populus tremula L., Alnus Mill., Salix L.). Pines (Pinus sylvestris L.) are spread here on the sandy lands. The elements of steppe flora are met mainly in Tula and Oryel provinces, but along the valleys of rivers they penetrate to the north and north-west. It consists of species of Festuca L., Koeleria Pers., Stipa L., Phleum L., Flelictitrichon Bess., Poa L., Ranunculus L, Galium L., Anem­ one L., Salvia L.
    [Show full text]
  • Амурский Зоологический Журнал Amurian Zoological Journal
    Амурский зоологический журнал Amurian zoological journal Том VIII. № 1 Март 2016 Vol. VIII. No 1 March 2016 Амурский зоологический журнал ISSN 1999-4079 Рег. свидетельство ПИ № ФС77-31529 Amurian zoological journal Том VIII. № 1. Vol. VIII. № 1. Март 2016 www.bgpu.ru/azj/ March 2016 РЕДАКЦИОННАЯ КОЛЛЕГИЯ EDITORIAL BOARD Главный редактор Editor-in-chief Член-корреспондент РАН, д.б.н. Б.А. Воронов Corresponding Member of R A S, Dr. Sc. Boris A. Voronov к.б.н. А.А. Барбарич (отв. секретарь) Dr. Alexandr A. Barbarich (exec. secretary) к.б.н. Ю. Н. Глущенко Dr. Yuri N. Glushchenko д.б.н. В. В. Дубатолов Dr. Sc. Vladimir V. Dubatolov д.н. Ю. Кодзима Dr. Sc. Junichi Kojima к.б.н. О. Э. Костерин Dr. Oleg E. Kosterin д.б.н. А. А. Легалов Dr. Sc. Andrei A. Legalov д.б.н. А. С. Лелей Dr. Sc. Arkadiy S. Lelej к.б.н. Е. И. Маликова Dr. Elena I. Malikova д.б.н. В. А. Нестеренко Dr. Sc. Vladimir A. Nesterenko д.б.н. М. Г. Пономаренко Dr. Sc. Margarita G. Ponomarenko к.б.н. Л.А. Прозорова Dr. Larisa A. Prozorova д.б.н. Н. А. Рябинин Dr. Sc. Nikolai A. Rjabinin д.б.н. М. Г. Сергеев Dr. Sc. Michael G. Sergeev д.б.н. С. Ю. Синев Dr. Sc. Sergei Yu. Sinev д.б.н. В.В. Тахтеев Dr. Sc. Vadim V. Takhteev д.б.н. И.В. Фефелов Dr. Sc. Igor V. Fefelov д.б.н. А.В. Чернышев Dr. Sc. Alexei V. Chernyshev к.б.н.
    [Show full text]
  • Moth Surveys 2020
    Table of Contents Introduction 2 Visit 1 – 20th May, 2020 2 Visit 2 – 15th June, 2020 3 Visit 3 – 14th July, 2020 4 Visit 4 – 8th August, 2020 5 Visit 5 – 8th September, 2020 6 Visit 6 – 10th November, 2020 7 Summary 8 Acknowledgements 8 Appendix I – Recording Details 8 Appendix II – The Complete List 2020 8 Appendix III – National Status & Foodplants 15 Appendix IV – Other Wildlife Recorded During Survey 21 Some Photos From Sun Rising 2020 22 Cover Photo: 2064 (72.024) Ruby Tiger (Phragmatobia fuliginosa) 8th September, 2020 All photos in this report taken at Sun Rising by A. Prior © 2020 1 Sun Rising NBG Moth Surveys 2020 Introduction After the atrocious weather experienced going back to the last couple of months of 2019 it seems miraculous that six visits were made to Sun Rising during 2020. Throw in a frustrating global virus and it is even more so! Most were arranged at very short notice to take advantage of whatever decent weather was on offer. There were a couple of breezy nights, but they were mild enough to make them worthwhile and all were productive with additions of new species to further lengthen the site list. Visit 1 – 20th May, 2020 The weather finally relented towards the end of May and after all that had gone on earlier in the year it was decided that Martin Kennard and I should use this as a “test” night to see if we could carry on moth recording safely. Neither of us thought there should be any problem with that as by the very nature of moth recording we are widely separated.
    [Show full text]