DOCSLIB.ORG

Pterodroma Baraui) from Réunion Island, South-Western Indian Ocean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pterodroma Baraui) from Réunion Island, South-Western Indian Ocean THE TROPHIC ECOLOGY OF THE ENDANGERED ENDEMIC BARAU’S PETREL (PTERODROMA BARAUI) FROM RÉUNION ISLAND, SOUTH-WESTERN INDIAN OCEAN. A thesis submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of: Masters in Marine Biology at: Rhodes University By DANIEL KEITH DANCKWERTS BSc(Hons) African vertebrate ecology, Rhodes University DECEMBER 2014 “The richness I achieve in life comes from nature, the source of my inspiration” :- Claude Monet -: Abstract ABSTRACT: Réunion is the only tropical island that supports two endemic gadfly petrels. Population modelling has indicated that the current threats to the Barau’s Petrel (Pterodroma baraui) may drive it to extinction; this fate is almost definite for the Mascarene Petrel (Pseudobulweria aterrima). Management interventions have therefore been implemented, but conservation potential is handicapped since virtually nothing is known about the former species’ at-sea biology. Thus, following numerous recommendations, this study aimed to combine stomach content, stable isotope, and fatty acid analyses so to provide new information on the at-sea ecology of Barau’s Petrel. Breeding colonies were repeatedly visited over the same season and samples gathered from adults, fledglings, and downy chicks. Stomach contents consisted mostly of accumulated cephalopod beaks whereas structures from fishes, molluscs, arthropods, and crustaceans were less frequently encountered. Fatty acid profiles of blood varied greatly among individuals and the low incidences of monounsaturated and n-3 fatty acids discounted fish as an important dietary component. δ15N of blood indicated a niche between the fourth and fifth trophic levels, which proposes that these birds scavenge to a greater degree than other sympatric seabirds and suggests that adults are also reliant on their endogenous reserves during breeding. δ13C values confirmed the migratory behaviour of adults since birds returning from the non- breeding grounds were enriched relative to individuals sampled through the breeding period. Significant intra-breeding season variations in δ13C were also observed, which matched this species’ patterns of habitat use as have recently described. These results collectively indicate an opportunistic behaviour, which implies some degree of resilience against shifts in prey availability/accessibility, and suggest that this species’ reproduction is i Abstract dependent on distant foraging areas. This breeding strategy is synonymous with great vulnerability as over-investing into a single breeding episode may jeopardize future survival and fecundity. Thus, in light of environmental conditions that are becoming increasingly more susceptible to dramatic changes, the birds could rather be prioritising adult survival, over reproductive output. Further work is obviously necessary and should benefit from databases of fatty acid profiles and isotope signatures of potential prey species. ii Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS: ABSTRACT: ...................................................................................................................................i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: .......................................................................................................... viii LIST OF NON-STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS: ................................................................................ x LIST OF FIGURES: ...................................................................................................................... xii LIST OF TABLES: ...................................................................................................................... xvii CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION ...................................................... 1 1.1. Seabirds as biological models ..................................................................................... 1 1.2. Research, management, and conservation priorities for procellariiform seabirds .... 3 1.3. Réunion Island’s endemic Petrels ............................................................................... 8 1.3.1. Description ...................................................................................................... 8 1.3.2. History and taxonomy ................................................................................... 10 1.3.3. At-sea distribution and habitat ..................................................................... 11 1.3.4. Reproductive behaviour ................................................................................ 14 1.3.5. Relationship with man and conservation...................................................... 18 1.3.6. Trophic ecology ............................................................................................. 19 1.4. Motivation, objectives, and hypotheses ................................................................... 20 CHAPTER 2: STUDY SITE AND GENERAL METHODOLOGY ....................................................... 23 2.1. Study site ................................................................................................................... 23 iii Table of contents 2.1.1. Geography and topography .......................................................................... 24 2.1.2. Flora ............................................................................................................... 25 2.1.3. Fauna ............................................................................................................. 25 2.2. General methodology ............................................................................................... 26 2.2.1. Pre-sample collection preparation ................................................................ 26 2.2.2. Sample collection from dead birds ............................................................... 27 2.2.3. Sample collection from live birds .................................................................. 28 2.2.4. Molecular sexing ........................................................................................... 30 CHAPTER 3: IDENTIFICATION OF THE KEY DIETARY RESOURCES TARGETED BY BARAU’S PETREL (PTERODROMA BARAUI) DURING THE BREEDING SEASON AS INFERRED FROM TRADITIONAL STOMACH CONTENT ANALYSIS. ....................................................................... 33 3.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 33 3.2. Materials and methods ............................................................................................. 36 3.2.1. Sample description ........................................................................................ 36 3.2.2. Stomach content analysis ............................................................................. 36 3.2.3. Prey group identification ............................................................................... 38 3.2.4. Data analysis .................................................................................................. 39 3.2.5. Size estimation of cephalopod prey .............................................................. 40 3.3. Results ....................................................................................................................... 41 3.3.1. Breadth of diet .............................................................................................. 41 3.3.2. Diet composition ........................................................................................... 42 3.3.3. Size structure of cephalopod prey ................................................................ 46 iv Table of contents 3.4. Discussion .................................................................................................................. 48 3.4.1. Overall diet composition of breeding Barau’s Petrel .................................... 49 3.4.2. Other inferences about the foraging behaviour of breeding adult Barau’s Petrel ............................................................................................................. 53 3.4.3. Limitations of stomach content analyses ...................................................... 57 3.4.4. Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................. 60 CHAPTER 4: INTRA-ANNUAL VARIATION IN THE FORAGING ECOLOGY OF A MIGRATORY, TRULY-PELAGIC SEABIRD: INSIGHTS FROM AN ANALYSIS OF CARBON AND NITROGEN STABLE ISOTOPES. ................................................................................................................................ 62 4.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 62 4.2. Materials and methods ............................................................................................. 67 4.2.1. Tissue selection ............................................................................................. 67 4.2.2. Sample description ........................................................................................ 68 4.2.3. Sample preparation ....................................................................................... 69 4.2.4. Sample analysis ............................................................................................. 70 4.2.5. Trophic level estimation ................................................................................ 71 4.2.6. Data analysis .................................................................................................. 72 4.3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cytochrome-B Evidence for Validity and Phylogenetic Relationships of Pseudobulweria and Bulweria (Procellariidae)
    The Auk 115(1):188-195, 1998 CYTOCHROME-B EVIDENCE FOR VALIDITY AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF PSEUDOBULWERIA AND BULWERIA (PROCELLARIIDAE) VINCENT BRETAGNOLLE,•'5 CAROLE A3VFII•,2 AND ERIC PASQUET3'4 •CEBC-CNRS, 79360 Beauvoirsur Niort, France; 2Villiers en Bois, 79360 Beauvoirsur Niort, France; 3Laboratoirede ZoologieMammi•res et Oiseaux,Museum National d'Histoire Naturelie, 55 rue Buffon,75005 Paris, France; and 4Laboratoirede Syst•matiquemol•culaire, CNRS-GDR 1005, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelie, 43 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France ABSTRACT.--Althoughthe genus Pseudobulweria was described in 1936for the Fiji Petrel (Ps.macgillivrayi), itsvalidity, phylogenetic relationships, and the number of constituenttaxa it containsremain controversial. We tried to clarifythese issues with 496bp sequencesfrom the mitochondrialcytochrome-b gene of 12 taxa representingthree putative subspecies of Pseudobulweria,seven species in six othergenera of the Procellariidae(fulmars, petrels, and shearwaters),and onespecies each from the Hydrobatidae(storm-petrels) and Pelecanoidi- dae (diving-petrels).We alsoinclude published sequences for two otherpetrels (Procellaria cinereaand Macronectesgiganteus ) and use Diomedeaexulans and Pelecanuserythrorhynchos as outgroups.Based on thepronounced sequence divergence (5 to 5.5%)and separate phylo- genetichistory from othergenera that havebeen thought to be closelyrelated to or have beensynonymized with Pseudobulweria,we conclude that the genusis valid, and that the MascarenePetrel (Pseudobulweria aterrima)
    [Show full text]
  • Light-Induced Mortality of Petrels: a 4-Year Study from Re´Union Island
    Biological Conservation 105 (2002) 93–102 www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Light-induced mortality of petrels: a 4-year study from Re´ union Island (Indian Ocean) M. Le Correa,b,*,A. Ollivier b,S. Ribes c,P. Jouventin d aLaboratoire d’Ecologie Marine, Universite´ de la Re´union, 15 avenue Rene´ Cassin, BP 7151, 97715 Saint Denis messag cedex, France bSocie´te´ d’Etudes Ornithologiques de La Re´union, 1 rue Poivre, 97400 Saint Denis, France cMuse´um d’Histoire Naturelle, 1 rue Poivre, 97400 Saint Denis, France dGEC, CNRS- CEFE, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France Received 8 December 2000; received in revised form 2 July 2001; accepted 30 August 2001 Abstract We report the results of a study of light-induced mortality of petrels at Re´ union Island which holds two endemic endangered species,Barau’s petrel ( Pterodroma baraui) and Mascarene petrel (Pseudobulweria aterrima),together with an endemic non threa- tened subspecies of Audubon’s shearwater (Puffinus lherminieri bailloni). We collected 2348 birds attracted to lights between Jan- uary 1996 and December 1999,among which 70% were Barau’s petrels and 29% were Audubon’s shearwaters. We found also three specimens of the very rare Mascarene petrel. Most grounded birds were fledglings (94%). Light-induced mortality was seasonal and linked with the breeding schedule of each species. At least 20–40% of the fledglings of Barau’s petrels produced annually are attracted by lights. Light-induced mortality is a recent perturbation at Re´ union Island. Thus,the effects of this disturbance on the population dynamics of these long lived seabirds may be hard to detect at the present time,but they are likely to occur in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Vocal Repertoire of the Tahiti Petrel Pseudobulweria Rostrata: a Preliminary Assessment
    Rauzon & Rudd: Vocal repertoire of Tahiti Petrel 143 VOCAL REPERTOIRE OF THE TAHITI PETREL PSEUDOBULWERIA ROSTRATA: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT MARK J. RAUZON1 & ALEXIS B. RUDD2 1Laney College, Geography Department, 900 Fallon St. Oakland, CA 94607, USA ([email protected]) 2Marine Mammal Research Program, Hawai’i Institute of Marine Biology, P.O. Box 1106, Kane’ohe, Hawai’i 96744, USA Received 7 February 2013, accepted 15 May 2014 Tahiti Petrel captured on Mt. Lata, December 2002 (Photo: M. Fialua). SUMMARY RAUZON, M.J. & RUDD, A.B. 2014. Vocal repertoire of Tahiti Petrel Pseudobulweria rostrata: a preliminary assessment. Marine Ornithology 42: 143–148. The Tahiti Petrel Pseudobulweria rostrata is a little-known seabird of tropical Pacific islands. Nocturnal at the colony and a burrow nester, the species relies on acoustic signals to communicate. Its vocalizations have not been intensively studied, and our study is the first to analyze the vocalizations made by the Tahiti Petrel in American Samoa. We found two main vocalizations, a ground call and an aerial call. The ground call consists of seven parts that allow variation to occur in duration and frequency in any portion of the call. That would be important to individual and gender variation, which may be critical to finding mates in burrows in the montane rainforest. The aerial call appears to be a condensed version of the ground call, used when approaching the colony in fog and darkness, and may have echolocating qualities. The Pseudobulweria genus has uncertain evolutionary relationships among petrels, and vocalization may provide a link to ancestral relationships to help better understand evolution of this group.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Action Plan Black-Capped Petrel
    January 2012 Conservation Action Plan for the Black-capped Petrel (Pterodroma hasitata) Edited by James Goetz, Jessica Hardesty-Norris and Jennifer Wheeler Contact Information for Editors: James Goetz Cornell Lab of Ornithology Cornell University Ithaca, New York, USA, E-mail: [email protected] Jessica Hardesty-Norris American Bird Conservancy The Plains, Virginia, USA E-mail: [email protected] Jennifer Wheeler U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arlington, Virginia, USA E-mail: [email protected] Suggested Citation: Goetz, J.E., J. H. Norris, and J.A. Wheeler. 2011. Conservation Action Plan for the Black-capped Petrel (Pterodroma hasitata). International Black-capped Petrel Conservation Group http://www.fws.gov/birds/waterbirds/petrel Funding for the production of this document was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Table Of Contents Introduction . 1 Status Assessment . 3 Taxonomy ........................................................... 3 Population Size And Distribution .......................................... 3 Physical Description And Natural History ................................... 4 Species Functions And Values ............................................. 5 Conservation And Legal Status ............................................ 6 Threats Assessment ..................................................... 6 Current Management Actions ............................................ 8 Accounts For Range States With Known Or Potential Breeding Populations . 9 Account For At-Sea (Foraging) Range ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Species Account from the Threatened Birds of the Americas
    JAMAICA PETREL Pterodroma caribbaea E/Ex4 Predation by introduced mongooses and human exploitation for food caused the extinction or near- extinction of this very poorly known seabird of the forested mountains of eastern Jamaica, which recent evidence suggests is (or was) a good species. DISTRIBUTION The Jamaica Petrel (see Remarks 1) formerly nested in the Blue Mountains of Jamaica, where specimens were taken at the summit in 1829 (Bancroft 1835) and in Cinchona Plantation on the south flank at about 1,600 m in November and December 1879 (Bond 1956b, Benson 1972, Imber 1991). Carte (1866) was aware of the species in the north-eastern end of Jamaica, and the John Crow Mountains, adjacent to the Blue Mountains, were known to harbour birds at the end of the nineteenth century (see Scott 1891-1893); Bourne (1965) reported that “birds are still said to call at night” in the John Crow Mountains. It is conceivable that the species also nested in the mountains of Guadeloupe and Dominica, since there is evidence of nesting black petrels in Guadeloupe (see Bent 1922, Murphy 1936, Imber 1991, Remarks 2 under Black-capped Petrel Pterodroma hasitata), and Verrill (1905) reported that the Jamaica Petrel nested in Dominica (see Remarks 2) in La Birne, Pointe Guignarde, Lance Bateaux, Morne Rouge and Scott's Head. Virtually nothing is known about the species's range at sea other than Bond's (1936) report of a possible sighting west of the Bimini Group, Bahama Islands. POPULATION When first reported in the literature in 1789 it was considered plentiful (see Godman 1907-1910).
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Seabirds: a Global Assessment 2 3 4 Authors: Maria P
    1 Threats to seabirds: a global assessment 2 3 4 Authors: Maria P. Dias1*, Rob Martin1, Elizabeth J. Pearmain1, Ian J. Burfield1, Cleo Small2, Richard A. 5 Phillips3, Oliver Yates4, Ben Lascelles1, Pablo Garcia Borboroglu5, John P. Croxall1 6 7 8 Affiliations: 9 1 - BirdLife International. The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK 10 2 - BirdLife International Marine Programme, RSPB, The Lodge, Sandy, SG19 2DL 11 3 – British Antarctic Survey. Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, 12 Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 13 4 – Centre for the Environment, Fishery and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33, UK 14 5 - Global Penguin Society, University of Washington and CONICET Argentina. Puerto Madryn U9120, 15 Chubut, Argentina 16 * Corresponding author: Maria Dias, [email protected]. BirdLife International. The David 17 Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK. Phone: +44 (0)1223 747540 18 19 20 Acknowledgements 21 We are very grateful to Bartek Arendarczyk, Sophie Bennett, Ricky Hibble, Eleanor Miller and Amy 22 Palmer-Newton for assisting with the bibliographic review. We thank Rachael Alderman, Pep Arcos, 23 Jonathon Barrington, Igor Debski, Peter Hodum, Gustavo Jimenez, Jeff Mangel, Ken Morgan, Paul Sagar, 24 Peter Ryan, and other members of the ACAP PaCSWG, and the members of IUCN SSC Penguin Specialist 25 Group (Alejandro Simeone, Andre Chiaradia, Barbara Wienecke, Charles-André Bost, Lauren Waller, Phil 26 Trathan, Philip Seddon, Susie Ellis, Tom Schneider and Dee Boersma) for reviewing threats to selected 27 species. We thank also Andy Symes, Rocio Moreno, Stuart Butchart, Paul Donald, Rory Crawford, 28 Tammy Davies, Ana Carneiro and Tris Allinson for fruitful discussions and helpful comments on earlier 29 versions of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Booklet
    About NEPA The National Environment and Planning Agency (NEPA) is the lead government agency with the mandate for environmental protection, natural resource management, land use and spatial planning in Jamaica. NEPA, through the Town and Country Planning Authority and the Natural Resource Conservation Authority, operates under a number of statutes which include: The Town and Country Planning Act The Land Development and Utilization Act The Beach Control Act The Watershed Protection Act The Wild Life Protection Act The Natural Resources Conservation Authority Act. Vision NEPA’s vision is “for a Jamaica where natural resources are used in a sustainable way and that there is a broad understanding of environment, planning and development issues, with extensive participation amongst citizens and a high level of compliance with relevant legislation.” Mission “To promote Sustainable Development by ensuring the protection of the envi- ronment and orderly development in Jamaica through highly motivated staff performing at the highest standard.” A view of the Blue Mountains The agency executes its mandate through the development of environmental and planning policies; monitoring the natural resource assets and the state of Jamaica’s environment; enforcement of environmental and planning legislation; processing of applications for environmental permits and licences; preparing Town and Parish Development Plans and Parish Development Orders; providing environmental and land use database systems; advising on land use planning and development; public
    [Show full text]
  • On the Brink of Extinction: Saving Jamaica’S Vanishing Species
    The Environmental Foundation of Jamaica in association with Jamaica Conservation and Development Trust present The 7th Annual EFJ Public Lecture On the Brink of Extinction: Saving Jamaica’s Vanishing Species Dr. Byron Wilson, Senior Lecturer, Department of Life Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona October 20, 2011, 5:30 pm FOREWORD The Environmental Foundation of Jamaica (EFJ) is very pleased to welcome you to our 7th Annual Public Lecture. The Lecture this year is being organized in partnership with our member and long standing partners at the Jamaica Conservation and Development Trust (JCDT). JCDT has been a major player not only in Protected Areas and Management of the Blue and John Crow Mountain National Park, but also in the area of public awareness and education with features such as the National Green Expo held every other year. Like all our work over the last 18 years, we have balanced the Public Lectures between our two major areas of focus – Child Development and Environmental Management. This year, our environmental lecture will focus on issues of biodiversity and human impact on ecological habitats. Our lecturer, Dr. Byron Wilson is a Senior Lecturer in the University of the West Indies. He is an expert in conservation biology and has dedicated his research to the ecology and conservation of the critically endangered Jamaican Iguana and other rare endemic reptile species. In addition to Dr. Wilson’s work, the EFJ has partnered with Government, Researchers and Conservationists to study and record critical information and data on Endemic and Endangered Species across Jamaica, including the establishment of the UWI/EFJ Biodiversity Centre in Port Royal, the Virtual Herbarium and the publication of the “Endemic Trees of Jamaica” book.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES REPORT for ASHY STORM-PETREL (Oceanodroma Homochroa)
    1 SPECIES REPORT FOR ASHY STORM-PETREL (Oceanodroma homochroa) PHOTO CREDIT: ILANA NIMZ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Bay-Delta Fish and Wildlife Office, Sacramento, California 9/16/13 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The ashy storm-petrel (Oceanodroma homochroa) is a small seabird whose known at-sea distribution ranges from about the California-Oregon Border to Islas San Benitos, Mexico. The 32 known breeding sites of the ashy storm-petrel stretch from Point Cabrillo, Mendocino County, California to Islas Todos Santos Island, Ensenada, Mexico. More than 90 percent of the population breeds in two population centers at Southeast (SE) Farallon Island and in the California Channel Islands. Anacapa, San Miguel, Santa Cruz, Santa Rosa, San Clemente, San Nicholas, Santa Barbara, and Santa Catalina Islands comprise the Channel Islands. Ashy storm-petrels occur at their breeding colonies nearly year-round and occur in greater numbers from February through October. The ashy storm-petrel feeds at night on euphausiids, other krill, decapods, larval lanternfish, fish eggs, young squid, and spiny lobster. Previous Federal Actions The purpose of this species report is to provide the best available scientific and commercial information about the species so that we can evaluate whether or not the species warrants protection under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act or ESA). On August 9, 2009, the Service announced its 12-month finding that found, after reviewing the best available scientific and commercial information, listing the ashy storm-petrel was not warranted. The Center for Biological Diversity challenged this decision in the District Court of the Northern District of California on October 25, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Espèces Françaises En Danger Critique D'extinction Selon L
    Service du Patrimoine Naturel Département Ecologie et Gestion de la Biodiversité Coordination : Olivier Escuder Patrick Haffner Les espèces françaises en danger critique d'extinction selon l'UICN (Liste rouge mondiale version 2007) Etat de conservation sur le territoire national, préconisation de mesures de gestion Tome 1 : Espèces Animales Convention MEEDDAT / MNHN 2008 - fiche n°1 Version finale ~ MNHN / MEEDDAT Rapport SPN 2008/7 Août 2008 Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle Département Écologie et Gestion de la biodiversité USM 0308 Service du Patrimoine naturel 14 août 2008 Ont contribué à la rédaction de ce rapport : Oscar Arribas, Stéphane Aulagnier, Jean-Michel Bichain, Michel Breuil, François Catzeflis, Romain Causse, Françoise Claro, Gilbert Cochet, Jacques Comolet-Tirman, Trevor Coote, Delphine Dananche, Olivier Escuder, Régis Gallais, Geraldo Garcia, Olivier Gargominy, Philippe Gaudin, Owen Griffiths, Patrick Haffner, Éric Hansen, Jacques Labonne, Frédéric Leblanc, Jean Lescure, François Moutou, Jean- François Perrin, Gilles Pottier, Vincent Prié, Philippe Raust, Bernard Recorbet, Marc Salamolard, Julien Semelin, Bernard Séret, Jean-Philippe Siblet, Simon Tillier, Jacques Trouvilliez et Jean-Pierre Vacher. Crédits photographiques : Première de couverture : photo de gauche (bandeau vertical) : Partula otaheitana , cliché : © Olivier Gargominy ; photo de droite : Albatros des Chatham ( Thalassarche eremita (Murphy, 1930)), cliché anonyme. Référencement : BICHAIN J.-M., COMOLET -TIRMAN J., COOTE T., ESCUDER O., GARGOMINY O., HAFFNER P., PRIE V., SERET B., SIBLET J.-P. & TILLIER S., 2008. Les espèces françaises en danger critique d’extinction selon l’UICN (liste rouge mondiale version 2007) – État de conservation sur le territoire national, préconisation de mesures de gestion . Rapport SPN n°2008/7, MNMN-DEGB-SPN, Paris, 329 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpestes Auropunctatus) Predation in a Hotspot Within a Hotspot: the Hellshire Hills, Jamaica
    Biol Invasions DOI 10.1007/s10530-010-9781-0 ORIGINAL PAPER Conservation implications of small Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus) predation in a hotspot within a hotspot: the Hellshire Hills, Jamaica Delano S. Lewis • Rick van Veen • Byron S. Wilson Received: 16 November 2009 / Accepted: 17 May 2010 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Abstract This study documents impacts of the small of sample size, this suggests that the analysis of Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus)ona stomach contents alone may mask important demo- threatened endemic fauna occurring in a biodiversity graphic impacts attributable to the mongoose (or other hotspot within a hotspot, the Hellshire Hills, Jamaica. predator species). In other words, rare and endangered We analyzed the stomach contents of 217 mongooses species may not be detected in diet samples, but the and supplemented this information with behavioural impact of predation may be of demographic signifi- observations. The mongoose’s diet consists primarily cance for effected prey taxa. This study supports of invertebrates and lizards, but bird feathers, mammal previous arguments concerning the negative impact of hair, and a small number of seeds were also recorded. the mongoose on endemic insular species, and under- Invertebrates and lizards accounted for 93% of iden- scores the utility of employing field observations of tified prey items. Of special concern were the remains mongoose foraging behaviour to provide important of threatened species such as the recently re-discov- insights into the conservation implications of preda- ered blue-tailed galliwasp (Celestus duquesneyi), tion by non-native predators. indicating that the mongoose may represent a consid- erable threat to this poorly known taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Seabird Conservation Status, Threats and Priority Actions: a Global Assessment
    Bird Conservation International (2012) 22:1–34. © BirdLife International, 2012 doi:10.1017/S0959270912000020 Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: a global assessment JOHN P. CROXALL, STUART H. M. BUTCHART, BEN LASCELLES, ALISON J. STATTERSFIELD, BEN SULLIVAN, ANDY SYMES and PHIL TAYLOR Summary We review the conservation status of, and threats to, all 346 species of seabirds, based on BirdLife International’s data and assessments for the 2010 IUCN Red List. We show that overall, seabirds are more threatened than other comparable groups of birds and that their status has deteriorated faster over recent decades. The principal current threats at sea are posed by commercial fisheries (through competition and mortality on fishing gear) and pollution, whereas on land, alien invasive predators, habitat degradation and human disturbance are the main threats. Direct exploitation remains a problem for some species both at sea and ashore. The priority actions needed involve: a) formal and effective site protection, especially for Important Bird Area (IBA) breeding sites and for marine IBA feeding and aggregation sites, as part of national, regional and global networks of Marine Protected Areas; b) removal of invasive, especially predatory, alien species (a list of priority sites is provided), as part of habitat and species recovery initiatives; and c) reduction of bycatch to negligible levels, as part of comprehensive implementation of ecosystem approaches to fisheries. The main knowledge gaps and research priorities relate to the three topics above but new work is needed on impacts of aquaculture, energy generation operations and climate change (especially effects on the distribution of prey species and rise in sea level).
    [Show full text]