On the Identity of a Little-Known Riccia Species, Riccia Wichurae (Ricciaceae) from Japan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On the Identity of a Little-Known Riccia Species, Riccia Wichurae (Ricciaceae) from Japan Hattoria 11: 23–29. 2020 On the identity of a little-known Riccia species, Riccia wichurae (Ricciaceae) from Japan Tomoyuki KATAGIRI Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Obi 6–1–26, Nichinan, Miyazaki 889–2535, Japan Author for correspondence: Tomoyuki KATAGIRI, [email protected] Abstract Detailed morphological descriptions of a little-known Japanese species, Riccia wichurae Steph. are given based on the type specimen. SEM images of the spores are also provided for the first time. The species is mainly characterized by 0.6–1.0 mm wide thalli with deep median grooves, lacking air chambers, purple or hyaline ventral scales, and large spore size (75–)80–90(–100) µm with irregular thickened wing margins. The author proposes that the species should be treated as a synonym of R. beyrichiana Hampe ex Lehm. which is widely distributed in Japan. Introduction Riccia wichurae Steph. was described by Stephani (1898) based on Japanese plants. Stephani gave a short description of the plants and the rough information on the locality: “Hab. Japonia (Wichura)” (Fig. 1). It is interesting that below the description Stephani also noted: “It is doubtful whether the plant is from Japan. It may be from another part of Asia. At least other liverworts from his collection were described as questionable in this regard. In any case, the plant is new”. On the basis of this description Hattori (1943) excluded this species from Japanese flora, and it has long been neglected by Japanese bryologists (Yamada & Iwatsuki 2006), while it was recognized as an independent species in the liverwort world checklist by Söderström et al. (2016). I think that this species should not have been buried but treated as a validly proposed species reported from Japan. The German botanist, Max Ernst Wichura (1817–1866), visited Japan in 1860 (Shirahata 1994, Stafleu & Cowan 1988) and collected plants from several parts of Japan. Brotherus (1899) showed that he collected bryophytes in such locations as Yedo (currently Tokyo), Yokohama, and Nagasaki. According to Stephani’s Icones (Stephani 1985, n. 9005), his description was based on the specimen, Wichura 1492a, which was kept in Stephani’s collection in Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de la Ville de Genève (G), and the specimen Wichura 1492a (G-00067889; Fig. 1) was considered the holotype (Turland et al. 2018; Art. 9.1. Note 1). As noted in the specimen label “Herb. Berlin”, Wichura’s collection was in the herbarium of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem (B) but it was 23 Figure 1. Holotype specimen (A) and close-up of the label (B) of Riccia wichurae Steph. Photographed from Wichura 1492a (G-00067889). destroyed during World War II. In this study I examine the holotype of R. wichurae and give morphological information including SEM images of spores for the first time. Based on the morphological information, taxonomic treatment of the species is proposed. Materials and Methods The type specimen of Riccia wichurae Steph. was investigated using a Leica M205C stereomicroscope equipped with a Nikon DS-Fi3 digital camera. For SEM images the samples were mounted on an aluminium stage with double-sided carbon tape and sputter-coated with gold at ca. 200 Å using a JFC-1500 Ion Sputtering Device (JEOL, Tokyo). The images were then captured using a JCM-6000 scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo). Taxonomy Riccia wichurae Steph., Bull. Herb. Boissier 6: 330. 1898. Figs. 2–4 Type: Japan (location not specified). Wichura 1492a (G-00067889!, holotype) Plants yellowish brown in aged material, forming partial rosettes 5–10 mm in diam. or intricate mats, not glistening. Thalli 1–2(–3) times furcate, 3–5(–10) mm long, branches 0.6–1.0 mm wide; median groove deep and narrow at apex, gradually posteriorly becoming shallow and widening to 1/4–1/3 branch-width; cilia absent or scarce. Ventral scales purple or hyaline, not extended beyond margin of thallus. Thallus section 0.4–0.6(–0.8) mm high and 2.0–2.5(–3.0) times as wide, lacking air chambers and consisting of vertical filaments with 1/3–1/2 thallus height; flanks weakly convex; margin acute, with thin-walled cells; epidermal cells collapsing, confirmed only with thin basal walls; ventral tissues parenchymatous, cells 50–70(–100)×30–50(–60) µm, often not persistent after dispersal of spores. Monoicous. Antheridial protuberances developed along the thallus midline, inconspicuous. Mature capsules slightly projecting to dorsal surface of thallus. Spores 24 Figure 2. Riccia wichurae Steph. A–B: Habit. C: Single shoot. D–F: Apical parts of thallus. Arrow shows the projecting part with mature capsule in E. All photographed from Wichura 1492a (G-00067889). 25 Figure 3. Riccia wichurae Steph. A–B: Cross-sections of thallus. C–D: Spores from distal view with different focus. E: Spores from proximal view. F: Part of wing from proximal view. All photographed from Wichura 1492a (G-00067889). 26 Figure 4. SEM images of spores of Riccia wichurae Steph. A–B: Distal view. C–D: Proximal view. E: Alveolae on distal surface. F: Close-up of wing from proximal view. All photographed from Wichura 1492a (G-00067889). (75–)80–90(–100) µm in diam., reddish brown; distal surface with 8–10 incomplete alveolae 7–10(–12) µm wide across surface and tubercles at the angles; proximal surface indistinctly alveolate, with scattered tubercles, with an indistinct trilete scar; wing distinct, 6–8 µm wide, sinuate or subcrenate, obscurely papillose, margin irregularly thickened. 27 Discussion The detailed morphological study based on the holotype shows that the above-mentioned description basically fits the original description given by Stephani (1898) and of his illustrations of cross-sections of the thallus (Stephani 1985, n. 9005) (Fig. 3 A–B). The morphological characters of the thallus, such as (1) 0.6–1.0 mm wide thallus (Fig. 2A–B), (2) median groove deep and narrow at apex, gradually posteriorly becoming shallow and widening to 1/4–1/3 branch-width (Fig. 2E–F), (3) purple or hyaline ventral scales not extended beyond margin of thallus (Fig. 2D), (4) thallus in cross-section 0.4–0.6(–0.8) mm high, 2.0–2.5(–3.0) times as wide, lacking air chambers (Fig. 3A–B), and (5) slightly projecting dorsal surface of thallus with mature capsule (Fig. 2E) suggest its close relationship to R. bifurca Hoffm. and R. beyrichiana Hampe ex Lehm., both widely distributed in Japan (Tominaga & Furuki 2014). According to Tominaga & Furuki (2014) who gave a taxonomic revision of the genus Riccia sect. Riccia in Japan, R. beyrichiana can be distinguished from R. bifurca by larger size of spores (75–105 µm in R. beyrichiana vs. 50–80 µm in R. bifurca) and presence of distinct irregular thickenings of wings. Although Stephani noted the spore size of R. wichurae as 68 µm, the detailed study shows that the spores of R. wichurae are characterized by (1) large size of (75–)80–90(–100) µm in diam. (Figs. 3C–E & 4A–D), (2) 8–10 incomplete alveolae on distal surface (Figs. 3C & 4A–B), (3) indistinctly alveolate and an indistinct trilete on proximal surface (Figs. 3E & 4C–D), and (4) distinct wing with irregularly thickened margin (Figs. 3F & 4F), and these data suggest its morphological relationships to R. beyrichiana. Taking the limited information which was based only on a single old herbarium specimen into consideration and considering morphological characters of spores are more stable than those of the thallus, I propose that R. wichurae should be treated as a synonym of R. beyrichiana which is one of the most widely ranging holarctic species of the genus with wide range of morphological variations (Schuster 1992; Paton 1999; Damsholt 2002; Tominaga & Furuki 2014). Acknowledgements I am grateful to the curator and staff of Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de la Ville de Genève (G) for the specimen loan. I also thank Dr. Yuya Inoue (Hiroshima University) for providing SEM images and Dr. Anders Hagborg (Field Museum) for checking the English text. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16K18604 and Grant- in-Aid for Scientific Research (Specially Designated Research Promotion) of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). References Brotherus V. F. 1899. Neue Beiträge zur Moosflora Japans. Hedwigia 38: 204–247. Damsholt K. 2002. Illustrated Flora of Nordic Liverworts and Hornworts. Nordic Bryological Society, Lund. 28 Hattori S. 1943. Ricciaceae nipponicae. National Science and Museum 14: 138–143. Paton J. A. 1999. The Liverwort Flora of the British Isles. Harley Books, Colchester. Schuster R. M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America, East of the Hundredth Meridian. Vol. 6. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago. Shirahata Y. 1994. Plant Hunters. Kodansha, Tokyo. Stafleu F. A. & Cowan R. S. 1988. Taxonomic literature: a selective guide to botanical publications and collections with dates, commentaries and types. Ed. 2, Vol. 7: W-Z. Regnum Vegetabile 116: 1–653. Stephani F. 1898. Species hepaticarum 1. Bulletin de l’Herbier Boissier 6: 309–343. Stephani F. 1985. Icones Hepaticarum (microfiche). IDC, Zug. Söderström L., Hagborg A., von Konrat M., Bartholomew-Began S., Bell D., Briscoe L., Brown E., Cargill D. C., Costa D. P., Crandall-Stotler B. J., Cooper E. D., Dauphin G., Engel J. J., Feldberg K., Glenny D., Gradstein S. R., He X., Heinrichs J., Hentschel J., Ilkiu-Borges A. L., Katagiri T., Konstantinova N. A., Larraín J., Long D. G., Nebel M., Pócs T., Puche F., Reiner-Drehwald E., Renner M. A. M., Sass-Gyarmati A., Schäfer-Verwimp A., Moragues J. G. S., Stotler R. E., Sukkharak P., Thiers B. M., Uribe J., Váňa J., Villarreal J. C., Wigginton M., Zhang L. & Zhu R.-L. 2016. World checklist of hornworts and liverworts.
Recommended publications
  • Eleven Species of Liverworts As New Distributional Records to Bryoflora Andhra Pradesh, India
    Bioscience Discovery, 11(3):111-120, July - 2020 © RUT Printer and Publisher Print & Online available on https://jbsd.in ISSN: 2229-3469 (Print); ISSN: 2231-024X (Online) Research Article Eleven species of liverworts as new distributional records to Bryoflora Andhra Pradesh, India. Ananthaneni Sreenath and Boyina Ravi Prasad Rao Biodiversity Conservation Division, Department of Botany, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Ananthapuramu -515003, Andhra Pradesh. E-mail: [email protected] Article Info Abstract Received: 05-04-2020 Eleven species of liverworts viz., Asterella khasiana (Griff.) Grolle., Revised: 10-06-2020 Plagiochasma cordatum Lehm. & Lindenb., Plagiochasma intermedium Accepted: 18-06-2020 Lindend & Gottsche, Riccia frostii Austin, Riccia poihaniana A.E.D. Daniels Keywords: Eleven Species, & P. Daniel, Riccia sporocarpa Bisch. Riccia stricta (Gottsche, Lindenb. & Liverworts, New records, Nees) Perold, Riccia velimalaiana A.E.D. Daniels & P. Daniel, Andhra Pradesh Riccardia levieri Schiffner., Riccardia tenuicostata Schiffn. and Riccardia villosa (Stephani) S.C. Srivast. & Udar, are collected from different forest tracts of Eastern Ghats in Andhra Pradesh, are being new distributional records the state. INTRODUCTION: Plagiochasma intermedium Lindend & Gottsche, Andhra Pradesh is the seventh largest state Riccia frostii Austin, Riccia poihaniana A.E.D. in Indian union, it covers an area about 162, 970 sq. Daniels & P. Daniel, Riccia sporocarpa Bisch. kilometers and lies between 12°37ʹ and 19° 25ʹ Riccia stricta (Gottsche, Lindenb. & Nees) Perold, Northern latitude and 76° 45ʹ and 84° 72ʹ Eastern Riccia velimalaiana A.E.D. Daniels & P. Daniel, longitude (Map 1). The state comprises 13 districts, Riccardia levieri Schiffner., Riccardia tenuicostata there are two areas namely called Rayalaseema and Schiffn. and Riccardia villosa (Stephani) S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • 02-Bryophyta-2.Pdf
    498 INTRODUCTORY PLANT SCIENCE layer. In certain species, the capsule con­ til1Ues to grow as long as the gametophyte lives. The presence of a meristcm in A11tlioceros and an aerating system complete with sto­ mata may indicate that Antlwceros evolved from ancestors with even ·larger· and more 1. Civ complex sporophytes. These features may Bryophyt be vestiges from a more complex ancestral. 2. Wh sporophyte. that ti alga ? 3. De� ORIGIN AND RELATIONSHIPS OF THE Bryophyt, BRYOPHYTA 4._ characteri Little is known with certainty about the r are small origin and evolution of the bryophytes. The ' tall. ( B) fossil record is too fragmenta to enable • ry s true roots us to trace their evolutionary history. Frag­ ,, sperms ar mentary remnants of thallose liverworts, spore idium and mother\4'/ttN) which resemble present-day liverworts, have cell Jar arch� been foum! in rocks of Carboniferous age, bryophyt as have structures that may be remains of more com mosses. all bryoph The immediate ancestors of the bryo­ bryo whicl phytes were probably more complex plants from the have an i than present-day forms. In other words, the gametophy evolutionary tendency has been one of re- with a dip1 duction instead of increased complexity. •• • • • spores If evolution has progressed . from more • . •, .... • s. __ complex sporophytes to those of simpler • . vascular p Anthoceros . form, the sporophyte of wou1d • • green algat be considered more ancient than that of • (D) red Marchantia or Riccia. Because Riccia has Fig. 35-16. longitudinal section of the spo­ 6. How the most reduced sporophyte, it would be t·:i;,hyte of Anthoceros.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Ponds for Rare Mosses and Liverworts
    Creating ponds for rare mosses and liverworts Freshwater Habitats Trust 1. Mosses and liverworts Key messages Mosses and liverworts, collectively known as bryophytes, are an incredibly • Clean water is essential for diverse group of plants. There are over 1,000 species in the UK occurring all of our rarest mosses and in almost every habitat, from dappled shade in woodlands to almost bare liverworts. Avoid areas where limestone crags. Within these habitats the margins of ponds, lakes and the adjacent landuse could pools provide an important resource for many species because they add nutrients or pollution to provide areas of bare wet mud on which bryophytes can germinate surface waters or (Figure 1). groundwater. Unfortunately due to habitat loss, regulation of water levels and declines • On mineral or forestry sites, in the availability of clean unpolluted water, many bryophytes are now ensure that waterbodies have seriously threatened (Figure 2). By creating suitable pond habitats we can bryophyte friendly after uses. give rare mosses and liverworts the best chance of recovery. If needed, partition the site into areas for recreation and those for wildlife conservation. • Ensure that all waterbodies whether large or small have very wide shallow margins. Freshwater Habitats Trust This will increase the width of the drawdown zone and © Michael Lüth © Michael © David Holyoak © David Holyoak optimise the area available Figure 1. Bryophytes growing on bare mud within the pond margin: for bryophytes. Norfolk Bladder-moss Physcomitrium eurystomum (left) and Lizard • Create a complex of ponds of Crystalwort Riccia bifurca (right). different sizes. This will 2. Designing ponds for bryophytes provide a range of different environmental conditions and The spores of mosses and liverworts can readily move to new ponds on support the greatest number the feet of grazing animals and wildfowl.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverworts, Mosses and Hornworts of Afghanistan - Our Present Knowledge
    ISSN 2336-3193 Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur., 68: 11-24, 2019 DOI: 10.2478/cszma-2019-0002 Published: online 1 July 2019, print July 2019 Liverworts, mosses and hornworts of Afghanistan - our present knowledge Harald Kürschner & Wolfgang Frey Liverworts, mosses and hornworts of Afghanistan ‒ our present knowledge. – Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur., 68: 11-24, 2019. Abstract: A new bryophyte checklist for Afghanistan is presented, including all published records since the beginning of collection activities in 1839 ‒1840 by W. Griffith till present. Considering several unidentified collections in various herbaria, 23 new records for Afghanistan together with the collection data can be added to the flora. Beside a new genus, Asterella , the new records include Amblystegium serpens var. serpens, Brachythecium erythrorrhizon, Bryum dichotomum, B. elwendicum, B. pallens, B. weigelii, Dichodontium palustre, Didymodon luridus, D. tectorum, Distichium inclinatum, Entosthodon muhlenbergii, Hygroamblystegium fluviatile subsp. fluviatile, Oncophorus virens, Orthotrichum rupestre var. sturmii, Pogonatum urnigerum, Pseudocrossidium revolutum, Pterygoneurum ovatum, Schistidium rivulare, Syntrichia handelii, Tortella inflexa, T. tortuosa, and Tortula muralis subsp. obtusifolia . Therewith the number of species increase to 24 liverworts, 246 mosses and one hornwort. In addition, a historical overview of the country's exploration and a full biogeography of Afghan bryophytes is given. Key words: Bryophytes, checklist, flora, phytodiversity. Introduction Recording, documentation, identification and classification of organisms is a primary tool and essential step in plant sciences and ecology to obtain detailed knowledge on the flora of a country. In many countries, such as Afghanistan, however, our knowledge on plant diversity, function, interactions of species and number of species in ecosystems is very limited and far from being complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Marchantiales, I-Iii
    Journ. Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 71: 267-287 (Jan. 1992) STUDIES ON MARCHANTIALES, I-III 1 R. M. SCHUSTER I. THE CLASS I FI CATION OF THE G E NUS RICCIA L. Riccia remains a puzzling group whose intrageneric classification is still unresolv­ ed. Recent chromosome counts (Jovet-Ast 1975; Na-Thalang 1980; Bornefeld 1984) show that in various taxa these range from n = 8, 9, 10 and 12 to n = 16 to n = 24 and 48, with R. caroliniana Na-Thalang, the type of subg. Viridisquamata (Na-Thalang) Jovet-Ast deviant in having n = JO. Subg. Riccia (sect. Riccia sensu Volk & Bornefeld) has chromosome numbers of n = 8, 16, 24 recurring repeatedly, with one [ undescribed] species aneuploid with n = 15, except for R. albosquamata S. Arn., with n = 12. Aside from in the isolated taxa, R. caroliniana and R . albosquamata , thus, chromosome numbers seem to offer little hope for working out an intrageneric phylogeny today. Several taxa (i.a., R. lamellosa s. amplo) occur as polyploid races. If far-reaching attempts at homologizing the basic chromosome complement found in Riccia represent reality, then, eventually, perhaps chromosome structure may give us some aid in refining our classification. To date, it does not. (The attempt by Bornefeld ( 1984) to derive the Riccia genotype, together with that of Takakia and the Antherocotae, from one basic type seems forced to me. We are still not certain if the basic number is 4 or 5 (both are found in Takakia, although Bornefeld states "nur 4 Chromosomen" are found in Takakia; the latter number occurs in anthocerotes).
    [Show full text]
  • Ricciocarpos Natans Fringed Heartwort
    Marchantiales Ricciocarpos natans Fringed Heartwort 8 mm Floating form 4 mm Identification This small thallose liverwort has both floating and terrestrial forms. Floating plants consist of small, yellow-green to dark green or reddish-tinged, duckweed (Lemna)- like rosettes 5–15 mm diameter. Thalli have a conspicuous fringe of violet, spreading ventral scales with a finely toothed margin protruding from beneath the lobes. The heart-shaped thalli branch regularly in a Y-like fashion, with each branch of a pair approximately equal in size to its twin branch, and each thallus ending in 2 broadly rounded lobes. Inconspicuous dots (air pores) lie on the upper surface, surrounded by lines arranged in a delicate network. Terrestrial plants are often more pigmented, with much smaller ventral scales than in floating plants.R. natans is only known non-fertile in the British Isles, unlike most Riccia species. Similar species Floating forms are more likely to be confused with the vascular plant duckweed (Lemna) at first glance, but duckweeds are smooth, and lack ventral scales. Floating Riccia species (Riccia fluitans, p. 261, and Riccia rhenana, Paton, p. 583) have narrow, linear thalli about 1 mm wide. Terrestrial forms could be confused with Riccia cavernosa (p. 263) and Riccia crystallina (p. 262), but those species lack a median groove or have one only at the branch tips, and the upper thallus surface soon disintegrates and becomes conspicuously spongy. Riccia huebeneriana (p. 264, which has grooved branches like R. natans) differs in its narrow, usually reddish branches and older parts becoming spongy. Habitat This southern species is found floating in mineral-rich pools, ditches, canals and drains, sometimes on slow-flowing streams, often where the water is calcareous, or on mud at the water’s edge.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Constituents of Japanese Ricciocarpos Natans
    J Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 81 : 257- 262 (Feb. 1997) CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF JAPANESE RICCIOCARPOS NATANS 1 TATSUHIKO YOSHIDA , MASAO TOYOTA1, TOSHIHIRO 1 1 HASHIMOT0 and YOSHINORl ASAKAWA ABSTRACT. From the methanol extract of Japanese Ricciocarpos natans (Ricciaceae), stigmast-4-en- 3-one, sitost-4-en-3-one, lunularic acid and phytol have been isolated, together with the mixture of stigmasterol, sitosterol and fatty acids. This is the first example of the isolation of the steroid ketones from the bryophytes. The chemical constituents of Japanese R. natans are collected in the field are quite different from those of R. natans grown in axenic culture. INTRODUCTION Liverworts are rich sources of mono-, sesqui- and diterpenoids and lipophilic aromatic compounds several of which show interesting biological activity (Asakawa 1982, 1990, 1993, 1996). Ricciocarpos natans which lives on the surface of pond and paddy field be­ longs to the Ricciaceae. Previously, Huneck et al. (1972) reported the presence of sitosterol (3) in the field-collected R. natans. Recently, the chemical constituents of European R. natans grown in axenic culture was analyzed and showed to have cuparane- (6) and mono­ cyclofarnesane-type sesquiterpenoids (7) (Wurzel & Becker 1989, 1990), bibenzyl and benzyl derivative including their glucosides (5, 8-10) and cyclic bis(bibenzyl) dimer, pusi­ latin B (12) (Kunz & Becker 1992; Siegmund and Becker 1994), cyclic bis(bibenzyl), ric­ cardin C (11) (Asakawa & Matsuda 1982; Kunz & Becker 1992), fatty acids, palmitic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, linolenic, arachidonic, 5,8,l l,14,l 7-eicosapentaenoic acids (Kohn et al. 1988) and flavonoids (Markham & Porter 1975). We are continuing to study the chemi­ cal constituents of bryophytes not only from the isolation and the structure elucidation of biologically active components but also from chemosystematics.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Identity of Riccia Vulcanicola Eb. Fisch. (Marchantiophyta: Ricciaceae)
    Botanica Pacifica. A journal of plant science and conservation. 2017. 6(2): 49–51 DOI: 10.17581/bp.2017.06206 On the identity of Riccia vulcanicola Eb. Fisch. (Marchantiophyta: Ricciaceae) Eugene A. Borovichev 1,2 * & Vadim A. Bakalin 3 Eugene A. Borovichev 1,2 * ABSTRACT e­mail: [email protected] The study of type specimen of Riccia vulcanicola Eb. Fisch. recently described from Vadim A. Bakalin 3 Africa (Rwanda) has revealed its identity with R. nipponica S. Hatt., the imper fectly e­mail: [email protected] known East Asian taxon. Two names are synonymized under R. nipponica having priority over R. vulcanicola. The present result considerable extends the known 1 area of the species and expects its distribution in some wetter areas of Medi ter­ Polar­Alpine Botanical Garden­Institute ra nean and mountain system of equatorial and subequatorial Africa. of the Kola Science Center of RAS, Kirovsk, Russia Keywords: Riccia vulcanicola, Riccia nipponica, Ricciaceae, taxonomy 2 Institute of Industrial Ecology Problems РЕЗЮМЕ of the North of the Kola Science Center of RAS, Apatity, Russia Боровичев Е.А., Бакалин В.А. О статусе Riccia vulcanicola Eb. Fisch. (Marchan tiophyta: Ricciaceae). Изучение типа Riccia vulcanicola Eb. Fisch., не­ 3 Botanical Garden­Institute FEB RAS, дав но описанного из Африки (Руанда) вида, показало его идентичность с ма­ Vladivostok, Russia ло из вестным восточноазиатским R. nipponica S. Hatt., в синонимы с которым све­ дено первое название. Учитывая существенное расширение известного ареала R. nipponica, можно ожидать его находок также в некоторых районах Сре ди зем­ * corresponding author но мо рья и горных системах экваториальной и субэкваториальной Африки.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Diversity of the Genus Riccia L. (Marchantiales, Ricciaceae) in Maranhão State, Brazil
    14 5 ANNOTATED LIST OF SPECIES Check List 14 (5): 763–769 https://doi.org/10.15560/14.5.763 Species diversity of the genus Riccia L. (Marchantiales, Ricciaceae) in Maranhão state, Brazil José Augusto dos Santos Silva1, Rozijane S. Fernandes1, Denise Pinheiro Costa2 1 Laboratório de Sistemática Vegetal, Centro de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais-CCAA, Universidade Federal do Maranhão-UFMA, MA-222, KM 04, S/N, Boa Vista, 65500-000, Chapadinha, MA, Brasil. 2 Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Pacheco Leão 915, 22460-030, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Corresponding author: Rozijane S. Fernandes, [email protected] Abstract Ricciaceae is a little-known liverwort family in northeastern Brazil. Fieldwork in 4 localities in Maranhão state yielded 4 species of Riccia, with 2 taxa, R. mauryana and R. weinionis, representing new state records. This paper describes the species diversity of the genus Riccia in Maranhão state, and provides descriptions, ecological notes, and illustrations for each species. Key words Biodiversity; bryophytes; Cerrado; liverworts; Northeastern Brazil; riparian forest; taxonomy. Academic editor: Adaíses Simone Maciel da Silva | Received 10 April 2018 | Accepted 9 July 2018 | Published 21 September 2018 Citation: Silva JAS, Fernandes RS, Costa DP (2018) Species diversity of the genus Riccia L. (Marchantiales, Ricciaceae) in Maranhão state, Brazil. Check List 14 (5): 763–769. https://doi.org/10.15560/14.5.763 Introduction for Marchantiidae; and Ayub et al. (2014), who reported 22 species for Rio Grande do Sul State (including new Riccia L. is the most species-rich genus within the order records for Brazil and for that state).
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in the Genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from Southern Africa
    Bothalia 34,1: 23-26(2004) Studies in the genus Riccia (Marchantiales) from southern Africa. 26. A new species in section Pilifer, Riccia radiata, is described S.M. PEROLD* Keywords: dorsal epithelium. Riccia radiata Perold, section Pilifer O.H.Volk. sporangia, spores, thallus ABSTRACT Riccia radiata Perold, a new species endemic to southern Africa, is described. It is referred to section Pilifer O.H.Volk, which is characterized by the dorsal epithelium of the thalli consisting of short or long, free-standing, hyaline cell pillars. INTRODUCTION mally shaggy, entirely covered with closely crowded, coarse white woolly tufts (Figure 3A-C); medium-sized, Including this new species, 18 southern African 6-11 mm long, growing from a narrow base, ± 0.5 mm species of Riccia have been referred to section Pilifer wide and widening distally to 2.5 mm before bifurcation, The previous 17 species were treated in Perold (1999). in crass section slightly concave above and rounded As I remarked previously in Perold (1990a), the species below, 0.9 mm thick, i.e. nearly 3 times wider than thick assigned to this section, with rare exceptions, have ± (Figure 2C). Branches once or twice symmetrically or rounded, colourless scales and in several the spores have asymmetrically furcate, lobes ligulate, narrowly to mod­ radiating ridges on the distal face. The dorsal cell pillars erately divergent, terminal segments 1.3-5.0 mm long, are composed of two or more hyaline cells: two cells in up to 2 mm wide, apex ovoid, rounded or wedge-shaped, R pulveracea (Perold 1990b) for example, and up to six once or twice shortly grooved (Figure 3B.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecophysiology of Development: Hormones
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Ecophysiology of Development: Hormones. Chapt. 5-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 5-1-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 5 June 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 5-1 ECOPHYSIOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT: HORMONES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5-1-2 Developmental Adjustments ......................................................................................................................... 5-1-4 Life Cycle Importance .................................................................................................................................. 5-1-5 Growth Regulators........................................................................................................................................ 5-1-5 Auxins ................................................................................................................................................... 5-1-6 Cytokinins ............................................................................................................................................. 5-1-8 Factor H .............................................................................................................................................. 5-1-11 Gibberellins ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]