DOCSLIB.ORG

Associated Societies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Associated Societies Associated Societies GSA has a long tradition of collaborating with a wide range of partners in pursuit of our mutual goals to advance the geosciences, enhance the professional growth of society members, and promote the geosciences in the service of humanity. GSA works with other organizations on many programs and services. As the Society looks to AASP - The Palynological American Association of American Geophysical Union American Institute of American Quaternary American Rock Mechanics Society Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) (AGU) Professional Geologists (AIPG) Association (AMQUA) Association (ARMA) Association for the Sciences of American Water Resources Asociación Geológica Association for Women Association of American State Association of Earth Science Limnology and Oceanography Association (AWRA) Argentina (AGA) Geoscientists (AWG) Geologists (AASG) Editors (AESE) (ASLO) Association of Environmental Association of Geoscientists Blueprint Earth (BE) The Clay Minerals Society Colorado Scientific Society Council on Undergraduate & Engineering Geologists for International Development (CMS) (CSS) Research Geosciences Division (AEG) (AGID) (CUR) Cushman Foundation (CF) Environmental & Engineering European Association of European Geosciences Union Geochemical Society (GS) Geologica Belgica (GB) Geophysical Society (EEGS) Geoscientists & Engineers (EGU) (EAGE) Geological Association of Geological Society of Africa Geological Society of Australia Geological Society of China Geological Society of London Geological Society of South Canada (GAC) (GSAF) (GSAus) (GSC) (GSL) Africa (GSSA) Geologische Vereinigung (GV) Geoscience Information Society Geoscience Society of New Groundwater Resources History of Earth Sciences International Association for (GSIS) Zealand (GSNZ) Association of California Society (HESS) Geoscience Diversity (IAGD) (GRA) 102 2015 GSA Annual Meeting & Exposition the future, it aims to build strong, meaningful partnerships with societies and organizations across the country and around the world in service to members and the larger geoscience community. National and international societies with consistent aims and missions of advancing the geosciences and/or science in general are invited to affiliate with GSA as Associated Societies. For further information, or if your organization’s contact person has changed, please contact GSA’s Executive Director, [email protected]. International Association for International Association of International Association of International Association of International Medical Geology International Society for Promoting Geoethics (IAPG) Emergency Managers (IAEM) GeoChemistry (IAGC) Hydrogeologists (IAH) Association (IMGA) Aeolian Research (ISAR) Israel Geological Society (IGS) Karst Waters Institute (KWI) Microanalysis Society (MAS) Mineralogical Association of The Mineralogical Society (MS) Mineralogical Society of Canada (MAC) America (MSA) Minnesota Ground Water National Association of Black National Association of National Association of State National Cave and Karst National Earth Science Association (MGWA) Geoscientists (NABG) Geoscience Teachers (NAGT) Boards of Geology (ASBOG®) Research Institute (NCKRI) Teachers Association (NESTA) National Ground Water Nepal Geological Society Paleontological Research Paleontological Society (PS) Seismological Society of Sigma Gamma Epsilon (SGE) Association (NGWA) (NGS) Institution (PRI) America (SSA) Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, Società Geologica Italiana (SGI) Society for American Society for Environmental Society for Mining, Metallurgy SEPM (Society for Sedimentary A.C. (SGM) Archaeology (SAA) Geochemistry and Health & Exploration (SME) Geology) (SEGH) Society for the Preservation of Society of Economic Geologists Society of Exploration Society of Vertebrate Soil Science Society of America Western Interior Natural History Collections (SEG) Geophysicists (SEG) Paleontology (SVP) (SSSA) Paleontological Society (WIPS) (SPNHC) 1–4 November • Baltimore, Maryland, USA 103 Organizing Committee 2015 BALTIMORE LOCAL ORGANIZING Sedimentary Geology Division: Ed Simpson, Ryan F. Morgan COMMITTEE Structural Geology and Tectonics Division: Chris Bailey, General Chair: David A. Vanko Mary S. Hubbard Field Trip Co-chairs: Richard A. Ortt Jr. (Chair), David K. Brezinski, Jeffrey P. Halka Representatives at Large Sponsorship Chair: David A. Vanko Marine/Coastal Geology: Joseph Kelley K–12 Education Chair: Michael Passow Paleoceanography/Paleoclimatology: Claude Hillaire-Marcel Special Events Chair: Michael S. Kelley Precambrian Geology: Kent Condie Student Committee: Hannah Susorney, Sophie Lehmann Soils and Soil Processes (Interdisciplinary Interest Group): Michael Young, Steven G. Driese 2015 JOINT TECHNICAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE ANNUAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES Chair: Peter T. Bobrowsky 2015 Technical Program Chair: Patrick Burkhart Christopher M. Bailey, Paul Baldauf, Richard C. Berg, Aaron L. 2015 Technical Program Vice-Chair: Paul Bauldauf Berger, Lisa Park Boush, Patrick Burkhart, Bernardo Cesare, Rebecca Pickering, Brian R. Pratt Associated Societies Association of Earth Science Editors: Monica Easton Geochemical Society: Brandy M. Toner, Matthew Brueseke Geoscience Information Society: Hannah Winkler Mineralogical Society of America: James S. Beard, Philip Brown GENERAL CHAIR NAGT: Randy Richardson David A. Vanko, Towson University, [email protected] Paleontological Society: Christy Visaggi, Marc Laflamme, Thomas D. Olszewski TECHNICAL PROGRAM CHAIR Society for Sedimentary Geology: Lucy Edwards Patrick Burkhart, Slippery Rock University, patrick.burkhart.sru.edu Society of Economic Geologists: Jeffrey Mauk TECHNICAL PROGRAM VICE CHAIR GSA Divisions Paul Baldauf, Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] Archaeological Geology Division: Cynthia M. Fadem, Richard Dunn FIELD TRIP CHAIR Energy Geology Division: Brett J. Valentine, J. Fred Mclaughlin, Richard A. Ortt, Jr., Maryland Geological Survey, richard.ortt@ Jen O’Keefe, Marc L. Buursink maryland.gov Environmental and Engineering Geology Division: Matt Crawford, Thad A. Wasklewicz Geobiology & Geomicrobiology Division: Frank Corsetti FIELD TRIP CO-CHAIRS David K. Brezinski, Maryland Geological Survey, dbrezinski@ Geoinformatics Division: M. Lee Allison dnr.state.md.us Geology and Health Division: Saugata Datta Jeffrey P. Halka, Maryland Geological Survey, jeff.halka@ Geology and Society Division: Suzanne O’Connell, maryland.gov Christopher P. Carlson Geophysics Division: Nicholas C. Schmerr Geoscience Education Division: Christopher L. Atchison, SPONSORSHIP CHAIR Shane V. Smith David A. Vanko, Towson University, [email protected] History and Philosophy of Geology Division: Renee Clary, Joanne (Jody) Bourgeois K–12 EDUCATION CHAIR Hydrogeology Division: Christopher Gellasch, Mark Engle Michael Passow, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia Karst Division: Cory BlackEagle, Bonnie A.B. Blackwell University, [email protected] Limnogeology Division: Tim Cook Mineralogy, Geochemistry, Petrology, and Volcanology SPECIAL EVENTS CHAIR Division: Yildirim Dilek, Wendy A. Bohrson Michael S. Kelley, NASA, [email protected] Planetary Geology Division: Debra Buczkowski, Danielle Wyrick, James J. Wray STUDENT COMMITTEE Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology Division: Alan R. Hannah Susorney, Johns Hopkins University, [email protected] Nelson, David Dethier, Anne Chin Sophie Lehmann, Johns Hopkins University, [email protected] 104 2015 GSA Annual Meeting & Exposition Sponsor Recognition–Session Cosponsor Organizations AASP - The Palynological Society GSA Planetary Geology Division Advances in Parasitology Special Volume Fund; Paleontological GSA Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology Division Association GSA Sedimentary Geology Division American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Petroleum, GSA Soils and Soil Processes Interdisciplinary Interest Group Structure and Geomechanics Division GSA Structural Geology and Tectonics Division American Geophysical Union Heritage Stone Task Group of the International Union of American Geosciences Institute Geological Sciences Association for Women Geoscientists History of Earth Sciences Society Association of American State Geologists IGCP-637: Heritage Stone Designation Association of Environmental and Engineering Geologists International Association for Geoscience Diversity Avalon Institute of Applied Sciences, Canada International Association for the Promotion of Geoethics Canadian Association of Palynology International Association of GeoChemistry Cave Research Foundation International Association of Hydrogeologists CLEAN Network International Nannoplankton Association Coastal Education & Research Foundation International Research Center on Karst Under the Auspices of Commission Internationale de la Microflore du Paleozoique CIMP UNESCO (International Commission of the Palaeozoic Microflora) International Society of Groundwater for Sustainable Development Council on Undergraduate Research Geosciences Division iSamples Cushman Foundation Journal of Palaeogeography Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research Karst Waters Institute EarthCube Marine/Coastal Science Discipline EarthCube C4P Mineralogical Association of Canada EarthScope Mineralogical Society of America Ecological Society of America MSA Mineral Physics EGU Division on Tectonics and Structural Geology NASA Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute Gemological Institute of America National Association of Geoscience Teachers Geo2YC Division of the National Association
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 World Championships Statistics
    2019 World Championships Statistics – Women’s DT by K Ken Nakamura The records to look for in Doha: 1) Perkovic can complete medal set by winning a bronze 2) Can Cuban (Perez and Caballero) win gold and silver, joining GDR as second to do so? 3) Can Caballero become 5th WDT to win gold for the second time at WC? Summary: All time Performance List at the World Championships Performance Performer Dist Name Nat Pos Venue Year 1 1 71.62 Martina Hellmann GDR 1 Roma 1987 2 2 71.02 Tsvetanka Khristova BUL 1 To kyo 1991 3 3 70.31 Sandra Perkovic CRO 1 London 2017 4 4 70.12 Diana Gansky GDR 2 Roma 1987 5 69.67 Sandra Perkovic 1qA London 2017 6 5 69.64 Dani Stevens AUS 2 London 2017 7 6 69.28 Denia Caballero CUB 1 Beijing 2015 8 7 69.12 Ilke Wylud da GER 2 Tokyo 1991 9 68.94 Martina Optiz 1 Helsinki 1983 10 68.82 Tsvetanka Khristova 3 Roma 1987 Margin of Victory Difference Distance Name Nat Venue Year Max 2.23m 66.56 Franka Dietzsch GER Helsinki 2005 2.09m 68.14 Franka Dietzsch GER Sevilla 1999 Min 13cm 65.44 Dani Samuels AUS Berlin 2009 18cm 67.32 Irina Yatchenko BLR Paris 2003 Best Marks for Places in the World Championships Pos Distance Name Nat Venue Year 1 71.62 Martina Hellmann GDR Roma 1987 2 70.12 Diana Gansky GDR Roma 1987 69.64 Dani Stevens AUS London 2017 69.12 Ilke Wyludda GER Tokyo 1991 3 68.82 Tsvetanka Khristova BUL Roma 1987 4 68.20 Ilke Wyludda GDR Roma 1987 Multiple Medalists: Sandra Perkovic (CRO): 2013 Gold; 2015 Silver, 2017 Gold Yarelis Barrios (CUB): 2007 Silver, 2009 Silver, 2011 Bronze Franka Dietzsch (GER): 1999 Gold, 2005
    [Show full text]
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS
    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 1998 Gems & Gemology
    VOLUME 34 NO. 1 SPRING 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL 1 The Dr. Edward J. Gübelin Most Valuable Article Award FEATURE ARTICLE 4 The Rise to pProminence of the Modern Diamond Cutting Industry in India Menahem Sevdermish, Alan R. Miciak, and Alfred A. Levinson pg. 7 NOTES AND NEW TECHNIQUES 24 Leigha: The Creation of a Three-Dimensional Intarsia Sculpture Arthur Lee Anderson 34 Russian Synthetic Pink Quartz Vladimir S. Balitsky, Irina B. Makhina, Vadim I. Prygov, Anatolii A. Mar’in, Alexandr G. Emel’chenko, Emmanuel Fritsch, Shane F. McClure, Lu Taijing, Dino DeGhionno, John I. Koivula, and James E. Shigley REGULAR FEATURES pg. 30 44 Gem Trade Lab Notes 50 Gem News 64 Gems & Gemology Challenge 66 Book Reviews 68 Gemological Abstracts ABOUT THE COVER: Over the past 30 years, India has emerged as the dominant sup- plier of small cut diamonds for the world market. Today, nearly 70% by weight of the diamonds polished worldwide come from India. The feature article in this issue discuss- es India’s near-monopoly of the cut diamond industry, and reviews India’s impact on the worldwide diamond trade. The availability of an enormous amount of small, low-cost pg. 42 Indian diamonds has recently spawned a growing jewelry manufacturing sector in India. However, the Indian diamond jewelery–making tradition has been around much longer, pg. 46 as shown by the 19th century necklace (39.0 cm long), pendant (4.5 cm high), and bracelet (17.5 cm long) on the cover. The necklace contains 31 table-cut diamond panels, with enamels and freshwater pearls.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the New Chairman
    Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy Newsletter No. 21 April, 2005 MESSAGE FROM THE NEW CHAIRMAN Dear SDS Members: This new Newsletter gives me the pleasant opportunity to thank you for your confidence which should allow me to lead our Devonian Subcommission successfully through the next four years until the next International Geological Congress in Norway. Ahmed El Hassani, as Vice-Chairman, and John Marshall, as our new Secretary, will assist and help me. As it has been our habit in the past, our outgoing chairman, Pierre Bultynck, has continued his duties until the end of the calendar year, and in the name of all the Subcommission, I like to express our warmest thanks to him for all his efforts, his enthusi- asm for our tasks, his patience with the often too slow progress of research, and for the humorous, well organized and skil- ful handling of our affairs, including our annual meetings. At the same time I like to thank all our outgoing Titular Members for their partly long-time service and I express my hope that they will continue their SDS work with the same interest and energy as Corresponding Members. The new ICS rules require a rather constant change of voting members and the change from TM to CM status should not necessarily be taken as an excuse to adopt the lifestyle of a “Devonian pensioner”. I see no reason why constantly active SDS members shouldn´t become TM again, at a later stage. On the other side, the rather strong exchange of voting members should bring in some fresh ideas and some shift towards modern stratigraphical tech- niques.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Iron–Silicate and Carbon Material of Carbonaceous Chondrites A
    ISSN 01458752, Moscow University Geology Bulletin, 2013, Vol. 68, No. 5, pp. 265–281. © Allerton Press, Inc., 2013. Original Russian Text © A.A. Marakushev, L.I. Glazovskaya, S.A. Marakushev, 2013, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Geologiya, 2013, No. 5, pp. 3–17. Evolution of the Iron–Silicate and Carbon Material of Carbonaceous Chondrites A. A. Marakusheva, L. I. Glazovskayab, and S. A. Marakushevc aInstitute of Experimental Mineralogy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, Moscow oblast, 142432 Russia email: [email protected] bFaculty of Geology, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119234 Russia email: [email protected] cInstitute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, Moscow oblast, 142432 Russia email: [email protected] Received February 18, 2013 Abstract—The observed consistence of the composition of chondrules and the matrix in chondrites is explained by their origin as a result of chondrule–matrix splitting of the material of primitive (not layered) planets. According to the composition of chondrites, two main stages in the evolution of chondritic planets (silicate–metallic and olivine) are distinguished. Chondritic planets of the silicate–metallic stage were ana logs of chondritic planets, whose layering resulted in the formation of the terrestrial planets. The iron–silicate evolution of chondritic matter is correlated with the evolution of carbon material in the following sequence: diamond ± moissanite → hydrocarbons → primitive organic compounds. Keywords: meteorite matter, carbonaceous chondrites, hydrocarbons DOI: 10.3103/S0145875213050074 INTRODUCTION 2003) in star–planet systems that are similar to the solar system, in which nearstar giant planets were still The occurrence of diamond in a stable paragenesis preserved and are distinguished under the name rapid with moissanite (SiC) in an ironrich matrix is a char Jupiters.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fossiliferous Spherule-Rich Bed at the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) Boundary in 1 Mississippi, USA: Implications for the K
    1 A fossiliferous spherule-rich bed at the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary in 2 Mississippi, USA: implications for the K–Pg mass extinction event in the Mississippi 3 Embayment and Eastern Gulf Coastal Plain 4 James D. Witts1, Neil H. Landman1, Matthew P. Garb2, Caitlin Boas2, Ekaterina Larina3, 5 Remy Rovelli4, Lucy E. Edwards5, Robert M. Sherrell6,7, and J. Kirk Cochran8 6 1Division of Paleontology (Invertebrates), American Museum of Natural History, New York, 7 NY 10024, USA 8 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, NY 11210, 9 USA 10 3University of Southern California, Department of Earth Sciences, Los Angeles, CA 90018, 11 USA 12 4Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, 13 NM 87131, USA 14 5U.S. Geological Survey, Mail Stop 926A, Reston, VA 20192, USA 15 6Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08901, 16 USA 17 7 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08901, 18 USA 19 8School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, 20 USA 21 [The final, fully formatted version of this article is available online at Cretaceous Research: 22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2018.06.002 ] 23 Abstract 24 We describe an outcrop of the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary exposed due 25 to construction near New Albany, Union County, Mississippi. It consists of the Owl Creek 26 Formation and overlying Clayton Formation. The Owl Creek Formation is rich in the 27 ammonites Discoscaphites iris and Eubaculites carinatus, which, along with 28 biostratigraphically important dinoflagellate cysts and calcareous nannofossils, indicate 29 deposition occurred within the last 1 million years, most likely last 500 kyrs, of the 30 Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Instability and Tipping Points in the Late Devonian
    Archived version from NCDOCKS Institutional Repository – http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/ Sarah K. Carmichael, Johnny A. Waters, Cameron J. Batchelor, Drew M. Coleman, Thomas J. Suttner, Erika Kido, L.M. Moore, and Leona Chadimová, (2015) Climate instability and tipping points in the Late Devonian: Detection of the Hangenberg Event in an open oceanic island arc in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, Gondwana Research The copy of record is available from Elsevier (18 March 2015), ISSN 1342-937X, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.02.009. Climate instability and tipping points in the Late Devonian: Detection of the Hangenberg Event in an open oceanic island arc in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt Sarah K. Carmichael a,*, Johnny A. Waters a, Cameron J. Batchelor a, Drew M. Coleman b, Thomas J. Suttner c, Erika Kido c, L. McCain Moore a, and Leona Chadimová d Article history: a Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA Received 31 October 2014 b Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Received in revised form 6 Feb 2015 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3315, USA Accepted 13 February 2015 Handling Editor: W.J. Xiao c Karl-Franzens-University of Graz, Institute for Earth Sciences (Geology & Paleontology), Heinrichstrasse 26, A-8010 Graz, Austria Keywords: d Institute of Geology ASCR, v.v.i., Rozvojova 269, 165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic Devonian–Carboniferous Chemostratigraphy Central Asian Orogenic Belt * Corresponding author at: ASU Box 32067, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA. West Junggar Tel.: +1 828 262 8471. E-mail address: [email protected] (S.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous–Paleogene Extinction Event (End Cretaceous, K-T Extinction, Or K-Pg Extinction): 66 MYA At
    Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (End Cretaceous, K-T extinction, or K-Pg extinction): 66 MYA at • About 17% of all families, 50% of all genera and 75% of all species became extinct. • In the seas it reduced the percentage of sessile animals to about 33%. • All non-avian dinosaurs became extinct during that time. • Iridium anomaly in sediments may indicate comet or asteroid induced extinctions Triassic–Jurassic extinction event (End Triassic): 200 Ma at the Triassic- Jurassic transition. • About 23% of all families, 48% of all genera (20% of marine families and 55% of marine genera) and 70-75% of all species went extinct. • Most non-dinosaurian archosaurs, most therapsids, and most of the large amphibians were eliminated • Dinosaurs had with little terrestrial competition in the Jurassic that followed. • Non-dinosaurian archosaurs continued to dominate aquatic environments • Theories on cause: 1.) Gradual climate change, perhaps with ocean acidification has been implicated, but not proven. 2.) Asteroid impact has been postulated but no site or evidence has been found. 3.) Massive volcanics, flood basalts and continental margin volcanoes might have damaged the atmosphere and warmed the planet. Permian–Triassic extinction event (End Permian): 251 Ma at the Permian-Triassic transition. Known as “The Great Dying” • Earth's largest extinction killed 57% of all families, 83% of all genera and 90% to 96% of all species (53% of marine families, 84% of marine genera, about 96% of all marine species and an estimated 70% of land species, • The evidence of plants is less clear, but new taxa became dominant after the extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Skempton's Poroelastic Relaxation
    Datashare 129 Skempton’s poroelastic relaxation: The mechanism that accounts for the distribution of pore pressure and exhumation-related fractures in black shale of the Appalachian Basin Terry Engelder and Rose-Anna Behr AAPG Bulletin, v. 105, no. 4 (April 2021), pp. 669–694 Copyright ©2021. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved. EXPLANATIONS FOR TABLE 2: In an expansion of work by Sheldon (1912) on COMPARATIVE TERMINOLOGIES FROM the Appalachian Plateau, east-northeast fractures were SELECTED JOINT STUDIES IN THE mapped across a region large enough to sample rocks APPALACHIAN BASIN through a 20° swing of the Appalachian oroclinal bend (Parker, 1942). Parker (1942) relabeled the strike fi The rst depictions of Appalachian Basin fractures joints in Sheldon (1912) as set III (accompanying paper were in wood block prints by Sarah Hall as they appear Table 2 and in this Datashare). This was necessary ’ in her husband s paper from the geological survey of because the azimuth of these set III joints (i.e., the east- the fourth district of New York (Hall, 1843). A print northeast set) did not follow around the oroclinal of Taughannock Falls cascading over the Geneseo bend as defined by fold axes. Parker (1942, p. 406) black shale a few kilometers north of Ithaca, New York, writes, “Their different character and constant strike shows two major joint sets that are not quite orthogonal. over the whole region point definitely to an indepen- The artist even captured a hint of lithological control dent origin, perhaps simultaneous or perhaps much of the black shale on joint development.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Ichnofabrics in Shale Gas Reservoirs
    3D ICHNOFABRICS IN SHALE GAS RESERVOIRS By @ Małgorzata Bednarz A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth Sciences Memorial University of Newfoundland October 2014 St. John’s Newfoundland Abstract This PhD research project uses three-dimensional ichnology to address issues of shale- hydrocarbon reservoir quality and provides new tools for ichnofabric analysis and ichnotaxonomic considerations. The study presents deterministic (devoid of conceptual simplifications and interpretations) visualizations of the true spatial geometry of the aff. Chondrites, aff. Phycosiphon and Nereites trace fossils and models the three-dimensional arrangements of the burrow components. The volumetric reconstructions of the real geometry of the trace fossils allowed for their comparison with the previously established visualizations and for reconsideration of pre-existing palaeobiological models. To date three-dimensional understanding of the majority of trace fossils is presented as conceptual drawings available only on two-dimensional media. Such reconstructions are extrapolated mainly from observations of cross sections of burrows from core and outcrop and do not allow for realistic volumetric quantification and full elucidation of complex trace fossil geometries in the context of the host-sediment. The new methodology based on precise serial grinding and volume-visualization presented herein addresses this gap in ichnological knowledge, and is especially useful for examination of the ichnofabric contained in mudstones and muddy siltstones where the application or non-destructive methods of 3D reconstructions as CT scanning or MRI is impossible owing to the rock petrological characteristics (e.g., low burrow-matrix density difference).
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Troy, Miss., 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle Chickasaw and Pontotoc Counties Mississippi by Charles T
    ~ Geology of the Troy, Miss., 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle Chickasaw and Pontotoc Counties Mississippi by Charles T. Swann, R.P.G. and Jeremy J. Dew Mississippi Mineral Resources Institute 310 Lester Hall University, Mississippi 38677 Mississippi Mineral Resources Institute Open - File Report 09-2S August, 2009 On The Cover The Mississippi Office of Geology drilled the MMRI-Reeves, No. 1 well in support of the MMRI’s surface mapping efforts. The cover picture is the drill rig set up in sand pits in sec.22, T.12S, R.3E. A set of core samples as well as a set of geophysical logs were obtained during the drilling operations. The well was begun in the lower Clayton section (Tertiary) and reached a total depth of 403 feet in the Demopolis Formation (Cretaceous). -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS On The Cover ............................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents . ..................................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures . ......................................................................................................................... iii Abstract...................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction. .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]