DOCSLIB.ORG

Municipality of Anchorage Public Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Municipality of Anchorage Public Transportation Municipality of Anchorage Public Transportation Department Human Services Transportation Coordination Plan Phase 1, 2007-2008 May 10, 2007 INTRODUCTION Agencies and providers of social services, medical aid, education, employment training and specialized transportation for disabled, elderly and mobility-limited individuals fill a critical need in our community. More than 30,000 Anchorage citizens struggle daily to obtain transportation mobility that meets their diverse needs. Mobility is their lifeline for access to training, education, medical services, work sites and other community activities. There are over 90 agencies and organizations in Anchorage that serve people with disabilities, elderly and low income citizens. This report sets out a Plan for Coordinating Transportation Services among these stakeholders. Its aim is to improve transportation services for persons with disabilities, older adults, and individuals with lower income. Strategies and actions to coordinate our collective efforts seek to improve transportation access; minimize duplication of services; provide quicker and more reliable transportation service response; achieve higher efficiency; and realize economies through better use of available resources. This Plan provides goals and strategies as Phase One for 2007-2008. It represents the first tier of actions toward advancing coordinated transportation services in Anchorage. Already, efforts toward that purpose are underway. A Human Services Coordination Task Group drawn from multiple agencies and providers is examining additional ways and means to expand the coordination agenda. Further work, to be done later, will extend the Coordination Plan for future years beyond 2008. TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION RETROSPECTIVE There is a long history of inter-agency coordination and collaboration for human services transportation in the Anchorage metropolitan area. In 1995, a major effort was undertaken among human service transportation organizations to develop coordinated transportation services. The Municipality Public Transportation Department led an effective effort that brought service providers, agencies, and users together to explore ways in which better and more cost-effective services could be provided for transportation-dependent residents of Anchorage through coordination of transportation services. Two key documents were produced from that effort, the “Human Services Transportation Coordination Feasibility Study” (March 1995) and the “Human Services Transportation Coordination Study Implementation Plan” (December 1995). A Working Group developed background understanding, compiled needs, assessed options and resources available, and identified a phased sequence of coordination that could occur over time. The 1995 documents have served as the baseline for human services transportation in Anchorage. They were instrumental in the creation of AnchorRIDES which combined the senior transportation (OATS) and transportation for people with disabilities (Muni-Lift) Human Services Transportation Coordination Plan Page 2 into a single system that operates as a brokerage utilizing multiple funding sources and providers (See Figure 1). Eleven entities collaborate with the Municipality in funding human services transportation under the AnchorRIDES umbrella to provide transportation via paratransit, taxi, fuel vouchers and bus passes. Figure 1: Human Services Transportation Funding for AnchorRIDES Human Services Transportation Funding FTAFTA AKAK DivDiv ofof SeniorSenior && DisabilityDisability MUNICIPALITYMUNICIPALITY OFOF ANCHORAGEANCHORAGE StateState ofof AlaskaAlaska ServicesServices FTAFTA 53105310 AMHTA ACS/FosterACS/Foster AMHTA GrandparentsGrandparents AnchorRIDES AnchorRIDES CHOICECHOICE Scheduling/DispatchingScheduling/Dispatching MedicaidMedicaid DriverDriver TrainingTraining ContractingContracting JARCJARC Anchorage Anchorage ReportingReporting SchoolSchool DistrictDistrict MaintenanceMaintenance AgencyAgency FaresFares PublicPublic OutreachOutreach && DonationsDonations ShipShip CreekCreek DrugDrug TestingTesting ShuttleShuttle ContractContract ProviderProvider PaymentsPayments RiderRider FaresFares && Donations MostMost Appropriate,Appropriate, LeastLeast CostCost ProviderProvider DeterminationsDeterminations Donations TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION PROVIDERSPROVIDERS ParatransitParatransit AnchorageAnchorage CabCab FuelFuel BusBus PassesPasses ServicesServices CompaniesCompanies VouchersVouchers The AnchorRIDES system is contractor-operated. The contractor is tasked with maximizing use of infrastructure and working with multiple community organizations to bring other funding agencies and service providers under the AnchorRIDES umbrella. Nearly $4.9 million was allocated for AnchorRIDES funding in 2006 (See Figure 2). Seventy percent of AnchorRIDES funding came from the Municipal operating budget while 30 percent was derived from other sources. Human Services Transportation Coordination Plan Page 3 Figure 2: AnchorRIDES Funding Sources, 2006 AnchorRIDES Funding 2% MOA 1% 12% Contractor 0% Fares 11% SOA DSDS-NTS Donations 70% 4% Agencies 0% Medicaid ADOT&PF Total 2006 Funding - $4,873,888 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION LEGISLATION On August 10, 2005, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, commonly referred to as SAFETEA-LU, was signed into federal law. SAFETEA-LU authorized the provision of $286.4 billion in guaranteed funding for federal surface transportation programs over six years through Fiscal Year 2009, including $52.6 billion for federal transit programs. Three programs are identified in SAFETEA-LU to address transportation needs of lower income persons, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities. They are referred to as the Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (JARC, Section 5316), New Freedom (Section 5317), and the Formula Program for Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310). The three funding programs focus on the needs of transportation disadvantaged persons and those with special transportation needs that cannot be met through traditional personal automobile or public transportation means. Starting in Fiscal Year 2007, projects funded through these three federal programs are required to be derived from a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Human Services Transportation Coordination Plan Page 4 SAFETEA-LU guidance issued by the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) indicates that the public transit-human services plan should be a “unified, comprehensive strategy for public transportation service delivery that identifies the transportation needs of individuals with disabilities, older adults, and individuals with limited income, laying out strategies for meeting these needs, and prioritizing services.”1 The requirements codified in SAFETEA-LU build upon previous federal initiatives to enhance social service transportation coordination. Among the prior items are: • Presidential Executive Order: In February 2004, President Bush signed an Executive Order establishing an Interagency Transportation Coordinating Council on Access and Mobility to focus 10 federal agencies on the coordination agenda. It may be found at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/02/20040224- 9.html • A Framework for Action: The Framework for Action is a self-assessment tool developed through the United We Ride initiative sponsored by FTA. States and communities can use the Framework to identify areas of success and highlight the actions still needed to improve the coordination of human service transportation. Further information on the framework for Action can be found on FTA’s website: http://www.fta.dot.gov/CCAM/wwww/idnex.html The State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities conducted a Framework for Action assessment during the October 2005 Alaska Public Transportation Conference. The clear consensus was that Alaska needed a directive that establishes structure for coordination of human service transportation at the state level. • The State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities are working toward organizing a Governor’s Coordinated Transportation Task Force to carry-out the President’s Executive Order. This Task Force will be made-up of state agency representatives who work with/advocate for human service transportation issues. The Task Force’s primary purpose will be to create a State Action Plan to address statewide coordinated transportation and mobility issues. The Task Force will be formed upon the signing of an administrative order by the Governor. • Medicaid Transportation Initiatives: Alaska Medicaid has three distinct programs to ensure non-emergency transportation for those individuals who are in need. Medicaid Transportation plays a significant and increasing role in community mobility as discussed later in this document. 1 Federal Register: March 15, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 50, page 13458) Human Services Transportation Coordination Plan Page 5 ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS The 1995 Human Services Transportation Coordination Feasibility Study inventoried service providers, tallied transportation budgets, and estimated trips served. The number of persons in three groups – limited income residents, elderly seniors and mobility- impaired individuals were estimated from census and service agency inputs. From these results, estimates of latent unmet client trip needs were derived. More recent census and agency data sources are used to update
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ropeway People Movers for Ski Resorts
    Ropeway People Movers for Ski Resorts by Andrew S. Jakes* Abstract Las Vegas, Reno, Sun City, Foxwoods, Tunica, Broad Beach, and several other international mega-resorts, have discovered that People Movers (Automated Guideway Transit) improve their image and subsequently attract new customers. In addition to presenting the rope-propelled People Mover technologies, this paper reviews how specific installations have solved visitor circulation needs in many hotel resort complexes in Las Vegas and elsewhere. This approach can be duplicated to many ski resorts worldwide since the level of ridership in Las Vegas frequently exceeds levels typically found on ski resort shuttle bus systems worldwide. We particularly focus on existing, proven technologies and specific installations, including ropeway Horizontal Elevators (Mandalay Bay, Mirage, Primadonna, and Circus-Circus Automated People Mover installations). People Mover systems represent major changes and advances in equipment, facilities, operations, and services in comparison with conventional rail, bus, taxi, and other street modes. System performance and capacities can be tailored to match expected loads and a broad range of performance and operational requirements. Suppliers usually claim, with justification, that they can adapt their product to buyer's specific needs. Vehicle size can be expanded or reduced. Seats can be added or removed from vehicles. Various grades and curves can be accommodated by altering guideway design and speeds. Riding the circulation People Mover system can be as convenient, safe and comfortable as riding a modern elevator. Stations can be sufficiently numerous to provide development-wide access. Passengers experience little or no waiting for vehicles. The operation can be environmentally friendly with no emissions, very little noise and minimum visual impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Elevator Law Revision 3.Doc
    MODEL ELEVATOR LAW The proper names of state offices may have to be changed. Please read this document carefully and correct to the proper name or title. ELEVATORS, ESCALATORS, PLATFORM AND STAIRWAY CHAIR LIFTS, DUMBWAITERS, MOVING WALKS, AUTOMATED PEOPLE MOVERS AND OTHER CONVEYANCES §1 Equipment Covered by this Chapter 1.1 This chapter covers the design, construction, operation, inspection, testing, maintenance, alteration, and repair of the following equipment, its associated parts, and its hoistways, (except as modified by Section 2.1). (a) Hoisting and lowering mechanisms equipped with a car or platform, which move between two or more landings. This equipment includes, but is not limited to, the following (also see ASME A17.1/CSA B44, ASME A17.7/CSA B44.7, ASME A17.3 and ASME A18.1): 1. Elevators; 2. Platform lifts and stairway chair lifts; (b) Power driven stairways and walkways for carrying persons between landings. This equipment includes, but is not limited to, the following (also see ASME A17.1/CSA B44, ASME A17.7/CSA B44.7, and ASME A17.3): 1. Escalators; 2. Moving Walks; (c) Hoisting and lowering mechanisms equipped with a car, which serves two or more landings and is restricted to the carrying of material by its limited size or limited access to the car. This equipment includes, but is not limited to, the following (also see ASME A17.1/CSA B44, ASME A17.7/CSA B44.7, and ASME A17.3): 1. Dumbwaiters; 2. Material lifts and dumbwaiters with automatic transfer devices. 1.2 This chapter covers the design, construction, operation, inspection, maintenance, alteration and repair of automatic guided transit vehicles on guideways with an exclusive right-of way.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Power Rail for Third Rail and APM Systems Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail
    www.conductix.us www.conductixtransit.com Transit Power Rail For Third Rail and APM Systems Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail 3rd & 4th Rail • APM & PRT • Stinger Systems • Monorail 2 3 Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail Conductix-Wampfler Transit Power Rail For over six decades, Conductix-Wampfler has built a worldwide reputation as a proven supplier of transit electrification products. We are your partner of choice when you need to power mass transit, people mover, monorail, and advanced light rail systems. Our mission is to design and build cost effective, energy efficient products, and to provide dedicated engineering expertise and support services that meet or exceed your expectations. We consistently meet your project needs in a variety of operating scenarios. Every component design is verified to meet the requirements of the application in our fully staffed test facility and through years of field experience. We set the standard for long term reliability and performance. Conductix-Wampfler has the engineering know-how, practical experience, and testing capabilities to be a partner in your success! You can choose from a wide variety of proven aluminum stainless conductor rail designs for mass transit systems. If you need a special rail design to meet unique and exacting criteria, Conductix-Wampfler can supply it! ISO9001:2008 Certified • Downtown People Movers • Automated Guideway Monorails • Light Rapid Transit • Amusement Park Scenic Rides • Automated People Movers • Maintenance Stinger
    [Show full text]
  • Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan for the Mat-Su Borough Area
    Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan For the Mat-Su Borough Area Phase III – 2011-2016 Final Draft January 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3 Community Background .................................................................................................. 4 Coordinated Services Element ........................................................................................ 6 Coordination Working Group – Members (Table I) ................................................... 6 Inventory of Available Resources and Services (Description of Current Service / Public Transportation) .............................................................................................. 7 Description of Current Service / Other Transportation (Table II) .............................. 8 Assessment of Available Services – Public Transportation (Table III) ................... 13 Human Services Transportation Community Client Referral Form......................... 16 Population of Service Area: .................................................................................... 16 Annual Trip Destination Distribution – Current Service: ......................................... 19 Annual Trip Destination Distribution (Table V) ....................................................... 19 Vehicle Inventory .................................................................................................... 20 Needs Assessment ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metromover System Expansion Study Final Report
    Metromover System Expansion Study Final Report Work Order #GPC V-16 Metromover System Expansion Study Final Report Work Order #GPC V-16 Metromover System Expansion Study Final Report Work Order #GPC V-16 Metromover System Expansion Study Final Report Prepared for: Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by: Work Order # GPC V-16 September 2014 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Miami-Dade MPO Metromover System Expansion Study Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................................................i List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ v List of Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................................................ vi 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Need ..................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anchorage Airport Moves Taxi Queue Closer Shuffle Frees up Heated Lobby for Those Awaiting Shuttles
    For Immediate Release: November 5, 2018 Contact: Trudy Wassel, Division Operations Manager – (907) 266-2545; [email protected] Eland Conway, Development Specialist – (907) 266-2694; [email protected] Anchorage Airport Moves Taxi Queue Closer Shuffle Frees up Heated Lobby for Those Awaiting Shuttles (ANCHORAGE, Alaska) – Beginning this afternoon Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC) passengers will be able to conveniently catch a taxicab as they walk out of the south terminal and cross directly over to the relocated taxicab queue. While those passengers waiting for hotel courtesy shuttles, and limousines will do so out of the elements—in the ground transportation lobby, where the taxicabs used to queue. “We looked at our current ground transportation operation, and asked ourselves. What can we do to improve our passenger’s airport experience?” said Jim Szczesniak, Airport Manager, “All of the taxicabs are warmed up and ready to go, and they queue up away from the baggage claim. While a little further down the curb, passengers are braving the elements waiting for the hotel shuttles.” The airport is shuffling things around on a trial basis. No longer will passengers have to wait outside for their hotel courtesy shuttle, or limousine. Now they will be able to watch from the comfort of the heated ground transportation lobby, and those catching a taxicab will have a much shorter walk to the front of the taxicab queue. There are no changes for the People Mover and the Alaska Native Medical Center shuttle. Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport is an important gateway to the city of Anchorage and the State of Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • January–June 2004 • $10.00 / Don Scott's Museum Chronicles • Light Rail in the Twin Cities
    January–June 2004 • $10.00 / Don Scott’s Museum Chronicles • Light Rail in the Twin Cities 40 headlights | january–june 2004 LIGHT RAIL IN THE TWIN CITIES By Raymond R. t seemed an inglorious end of an era for the citizens of the Twin Berger (ERA #2298) Cities area, back on June 7, 1954. But that was about to change. At left, car 111 waits for time at the temporary southern Exactly 50 years, 19 days since the last streetcar rolled in Minneapolis, terminus, Forth Snelling, passengers were lining up to ride on the city’s new light rail line. on opening day of the Hiawatha Line. It will be ISo many, in fact, that some had to be turned away. The opening of the third in-service train the Hiawatha Line promissed to become one of the most significant northbound. Onlookers are taking pictures and waiting recent events in the history of electric railroading, the culmination for their turn to board. of studies, plans and setbacks spanning over three decades. Most are not old enough to remember when the Twin Cities was last served Opening Day by electric traction, some 50 years previously. Saturday, June 26, 2004 was a perfect day — sunny and mild — certainly befitting the glorious ray berger event that was finally taking place in Minneapolis. People gathered at the Warehouse District/ Hennepin Avenue station for the opening ceremony as soon as the sun had risen. This terminal station, gateway to the city’s entertainment district, was the site of speeches by public officials. It is also the starting point of a new light rail line connecting downtown Minneapolis with the Twin Cities’ most important traffic generators: the Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport (MSP) and the Mall of America, the largest shopping center in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • TCQSM Part 8
    Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual—2nd Edition PART 8 GLOSSARY This part of the manual presents definitions for the various transit terms discussed and referenced in the manual. Other important terms related to transit planning and operations are included so that this glossary can serve as a readily accessible and easily updated resource for transit applications beyond the evaluation of transit capacity and quality of service. As a result, this glossary includes local definitions and local terminology, even when these may be inconsistent with formal usage in the manual. Many systems have their own specific, historically derived, terminology: a motorman and guard on one system can be an operator and conductor on another. Modal definitions can be confusing. What is clearly light rail by definition may be termed streetcar, semi-metro, or rapid transit in a specific city. It is recommended that in these cases local usage should prevail. AADT — annual average daily ATP — automatic train protection. AADT—accessibility, transit traffic; see traffic, annual average ATS — automatic train supervision; daily. automatic train stop system. AAR — Association of ATU — Amalgamated Transit Union; see American Railroads; see union, transit. Aorganizations, Association of American Railroads. AVL — automatic vehicle location system. AASHTO — American Association of State AW0, AW1, AW2, AW3 — see car, weight Highway and Transportation Officials; see designations. organizations, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. absolute block — see block, absolute. AAWDT — annual average weekday traffic; absolute permissive block — see block, see traffic, annual average weekday. absolute permissive. ABS — automatic block signal; see control acceleration — increase in velocity per unit system, automatic block signal.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Corridor Rapid Transit Project Alternatives Workshops
    Beach Corridor Rapid Transit Project Alternatives Workshops Department of Transportation and Public Works September 12 and 16, 2019 Meeting Agenda • Introductions • Project Overview • Project Milestones • Transit Modes Comparison • Alternatives Analysis Process • Evaluation Criteria and Methodology • Project Alignments and Evaluation Results • Evaluation Summary • Next Steps • FTA Capital Investment Grant Rating • Project Schedule • Public Engagement 1 Project Overview – Project Location 2 Project Overview – Purpose and Need • Selected as one of the six SMART Plan Rapid Transit Corridors • Major east-west connection • High levels of traffic congestion • Need to serve major regional economic engines 3 Project Overview – Project Goals • Provide direct, convenient and comfortable rapid transit service to existing and future planned land uses • Provide enhanced transit connections • Promote pedestrian and bicycle-friendly solutions 4 Project Milestones • Tier 1 Analysis Completed • Tier 2 Analysis of Alternatives – Automated People Mover (APM)- Metromover extension – Monorail – Light Rail Transit (LRT)/Streetcar – Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) • Public Involvement in Tier 2 – December 2018 Miami Beach Kick-off – May 2019 Project Advisory Group Meeting – June 2019 Alternatives Workshops – August 29, 2019 Project Advisory Group Meeting No. 2 – September 12 and 16, 2019 Alternatives Workshops 5 Transit Modes Comparison 6 Alternatives Analysis Process Technology Alternatives Input Data Analysis Evaluation Parameters Legend • Light Rail Transit (LRT)
    [Show full text]
  • Bombardier Manufactures a Variety of Standalone Transit Systems, Including the INNOVIA Monorail, the INNOVIA APM, and the MOVIA Light Metro
    Response to City of San Jose RFI 2019-DOT-PPD-4 New Transit Options: Airport-Diridon-Stevens Creek Transit Connection Bombardier manufactures a variety of standalone transit systems, including the INNOVIA Monorail, the INNOVIA APM, and the MOVIA Light Metro. All these systems, or a combination of these systems, could be an excellent basis for the Airport - Diridon - Steven's Creek corridor project(s). Of the three technologies, the INNOVIA Monorail appears to best address the objectives of the proposed project in that it is less expensive to construct, can be constructed more rapidly, and operates in a grade-separated, high capacity system. Ultimately the choice of technology depends on a variety of factors, most notably the planned ridership per hour, which are not available at present. As such, Bombardier has submitted information on all three technologies, and looks forward to the opportunity to discuss the best fit solution with the City of San Jose at their convenience. Bombardier anticipates that this project could be delivered as a Design-Build-Operate Maintain Finance (DBFOM) Public Private Partnership (PPP). Contact: Kevin Walker, Head of Ecosystem US West [email protected] (210) 781 9316 Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA Inc. 1501RFI 2019 LEBANON-DOT-PPD CHURCH-4 ROAD PITTSBURGH,New Transit Options: PA 15236 Airport -USADiridon -Stevens Creek Transit Connection Confidential and Proprietary Information Page | 1 New Transit Options: Airport-Diridon-Stevens Creek Transit Connection INNOVIA 300 APM Executive Summary With Automobile-based transportation reaching saturation in Silicon Valley, the City of San Jose is looking for sustainable transportation solutions which can be deployed quickly and cost effectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipality of Anchorage Public Transportation Department Memorandum
    Municipality of Anchorage Public Transportation Department Memorandum DATE: May 10, 2018 TO: Abul Hassan | Public Transportation Director THROUGH: Bart Rudolph | Planning & Communications Manager FROM: Christine Schuette | Transit Planner SUBJECT: Public Comments Summary – Service Change: 07-02-2018 ______________________________________________________________________________ Service Changes Addressed Public Comments Count Topics Count Source 5 Route 11 & 41 - Positive Feedback 27 Email 0 Route 11 & 41 - Negative Feedback 1 Facebook 7 Route 21 - Option 1 1 Petition 0 Route 21 - Option 2 8 PM - City Hall Route 21 - Negative Feedback 1 PM - Eagle River 8 (Want a Downtown Transfer) 6 PM - Mountain View Library Route 31 - Positive Feedback 4 PM - Muldoon 2 (Likes the Muldoon/Debarr Loop) 48 Total Route 31 - Positive Feedback 1 (Change Running Time 5 Min. later) Public Meeting Attendance Route 31 - Negative Feedback Count Location 2 (Do not change) 10 City Hall Route 31 - Negative Feedback 2 Eagle River 7 (Want a Downtown Transfer) 9 Mountain View Other - Not Related to the 07-2018 6 Muldoon 5 Service Change (Bring back the 36) 27 Total Other - Not Related to the 07-2018 3 Service Change (Bring back the 36 - stop at the library) Other - Not Related to the 07-2018 6 Service Change (Bring back the 60) Other - Not Related to the 07-2018 40 Service Change (varies) 168 Signed Petition * Each topic covered was tallied separately within each comment received PUBLIC COMMENTS I am an Administrator with the Federal Aviation Administration. I do not drive. I am writing to express my displeasure with the new bus system. Prior to the implementation of the new bus system, I used to take the bus from work every day.
    [Show full text]
  • What's New in European and Other International Light Rail Transit Projects?
    What's New in European and Other International Light Rail Transit Projects? DAVID BAYLISS he paper takes a broad look at goes on to review the status of light the pattern and nature of recent rail in the Eastern Bloc countries, Tdevelopments in light rail tran- Japan, and the Pacific Rim. As an ex- Sit outside North America. In so doing, ample of good state-of-the-art de- it uses a liberal definition of "light velopment, the new Tuen Mun line in rail" to include both conventional Hong Kong is described. Brief refer- Street tramways and unconventional ence is also made to examples of other automated systems. It looks first at the forms of innovative low- and inter- distribution of the light rail operations mediate-capacity guided passenger and describes the recent revival of in- transport, and their attributes are con- terest in light rail in the United King- trasted with modern light rail. It is dom, including recent developments in concluded that the flexibility and per- London's Docklands. The broad pat- formance of modern light rail make it tern of recent innovation in Western a suitable and affordable technology Europe is described with fuller ac- for improving public transport in a counts given of developments in wide range of cities. Hanover and Grenoble. The paper OUTSIDE NORTH AMERICA MORE than 300 light rail transit (LRT) systems of varying age and size are in service in 33 countries. As Table 1 shows, this total is heavily dominated by the fairly conventional streetcar systems of the Eastern Bloc countries.
    [Show full text]