Asserting Gender Justice Case studies of flagrant sexual and reproduc ve health rights viola ons
Human Rights Law Network 8, Vijay Colony, Near Railway Station, 576, Masjid Road, Jangpura Chittorgarh - 312 001 India New Delhi - 110014 India
Tel. : +91-1472-243788, Fax : +91-1472-250044 www.hrln.org Human Rights Law Network Email : [email protected], [email protected] The European Union URL : www.prayaschittor.org
Human Rights Law Network
Human Rights Law Network The European Union Human Rights Law Network The European Union PRAYAS' VISION
• Enable poor to have opportuni es for their social, economic, physical and cultural growth. • Create alterna ve knowledge and mechanisms for community development. • Lobby to secure social, economic, poli cal and cultural rights to all. • Respond to contemporary poverty related community needs • Campaign to gender sensi ve conduct and equity
Human Right Law Network's Vision
• To protect fundamental human rights, increase access to basic resources for marginalized communi es, and eliminate discrimina on. • To create a jus ce delivery system that is accessible, accountable transparent, and efficient and affordable, and works for the underprivileged. • To raise the level of pro bono legal exper se for the poor to make the work uniformly competent as well as compassionate. • To equip through professional training a new genera on of public interest lawyers and paralegals who are comfortable both in the world of law as well as in social movements, and who learn from the social movements to refine legal concepts and strategies. • To work towards an increased awareness of rights as universal and indivisible, and their realiza on as an immediate goal.
CREDITS Funded by : European Union Design : Cover photo: Book Design: Mahima Crea ons Printed by : Mahima Crea ons Wri en & Edited by : Tushita Mukherjee and Kshi z Sisodia Published by : Prayas 8, Vijay Colony, Near Railway Sta on Chi orgarh, Rajasthan312001, India Ph: +91-1472-243788/250044 E-mail: info@prayaschi or.org Website: www.prayschi or.org & Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) A division of Socio Legal Informa on Centre 576, Masjid Road, Jangpura, New Delhi, India 110014 Ph: +91-1124379855/56 E-mail: publica [email protected] Website: wwwhrln.org ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The publica on is based on research conducted by the fact finding team of Prayas and Human Rights Law Network. We would like to thank the whole team of Reproduc ve Rights Ini a ve of Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) and extend our gra tude to Sr. Adv. Colin Gonsalves, SaritaBarpanda and Sanjai Sharma of HRLN who were suppor ve throughout. We want to thank HRLN team: Doma Bhu a, Shanno Khan, Sunil Mow, Vikash Kumar Pankaj, Saroj Kumar Padhi, Debsmita Bora, Pra bha D'Mello, Pri sha Bora, Deepa Pandey, Prayas team: Khemraj Chaudhary, Govardhan Yadav, Ajalu Lingi, Duyu Anga, Jawahar Singh Dagur, Udailal Meghwal, Rameshar Sharma, Geeta Mathur, Rekha Nagda, Dinesh Lal, Lalu Ram Game , Sudhindhra Kumawat, Madhav Lal Meghwal. We are extremely grateful for the valuable inputs from Dr. Narendra Gupta who helped us at every level. We would also like to extend our gra tude to European Union for its financial support for this publica on. We would also like to acknowledge with gra tude the support of Chhaya Pachauli and Priyanka Sharma of Prayas. Lastly we would like to thank Mr. Balkrishan Gupta of Mahima Crea ons for designing and prin ng the publica on. TABLE OF CONTENTS
S.No. Par culars Page No. 1) Introduc on 1 2) Failure in providing maternity services: Maternal 3 and infant death case in Madhya Pradesh 3) Viola ons of health Rights of refugees in Mewat 12 4) Understanding quality of care in steriliza on opera ons 20 and Family Planning Indemnity Scheme in Delhi 5) S gma and discrimina on against transgender persons in Odisha 31 6) Maternal death in Odisha 43 7) Primary health services falling apart: A case study 51 of a non-func onal PHC in Arunachal Pradesh 8) A case of maternal and infant death in Bihar 58 9) Steriliza on failure leading to grave viola ons 67 of reproduc ve rights in Rajasthan 10) Maternal death case in Cachar, Assam 73 11) Denial of treatment to an HIV posi ve woman in need 84 of hysterectomy in Rajasthan 12) List of acronyms 92 13) List of laws related to women 94 INTRODUCTION
Discussion about sexual and reproduc ve health issues was always considered a taboo in India for a very long me and for a very long period a er independence while many na onal health programmes were ini ated but none rela ng to sexual and reproduc ve health was started. There was no clear defini on of sexual and reproduc ve health and no clarity on what entails into it. Ma ers rela ng to sexual and reproduc ve health were part of the mother and child health (MCH) programmewhich was started in 1952. It was only in the late eigh es and early nine es when randomized clinical trials were conducted in some areas of India, it came to knowledge that women carry a huge burden of sexual and reproduc ve tract morbidity a er they a ain reproduc ve age. These are essen ally morbidity rela ng to reproduc ve tract morbidity which remained undetected and untreated essen ally because of strong inhibi ons and majority of women suffered in silence. Things began to change a er the organisa on of the Interna onal Conference on Popula on and Development in Cairo in 1994 and the World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995 in which India was an important stakeholder. The Govt. of India modified the MCH programme and renamed it as Reproduc ve & Child Health (RCH) programme. Many new elements were added in the programme viz. detec on and treatment of RTI and STI clinics in Community Health Centres and higher ins tu ons through syndromic management approach, organiza on of adolescent health clinics and later women counseling and protec on centres to provide support in instances of gender based violence. New legisla ons such as the Protec on of Women from Domes c Violence Act 2005, the Child Marriage Restraint Act and the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Preven on, Prohibi on and Redressal) Act, 2013 were promulgated. India accounts for highest maternal deaths in the world followed by Nigeria according to the UN report on maternal deaths in 2014. In India nearly 50,000 women dies out of 2.85 lakh women due to complica ons arising out of pregnancy or childbearing. The Maternal Mortality Rate of India as per SRS 2012 is 178 and Infant Mortality rate is 42. Total Fer lity Rate of India is 2.3. To reduce the maternal mortality rate and infant mortality rate, India has ra fied with various interna onal conven ons and formulated various schemes and policies. The World Health Organiza on (WHO) reported that India's MMR, which was 560 in 1990, reduced to 178 in 2010-2012. However, as per the MDG mandate, India needs to reduce its MMR further down to 103. Though India's MMR is reducing at an average of 4.5 per cent annually, it has to bring down the MMR at the annual rate of 5.5% to meet the Millennium Development Goal. Despite India progressing no ceably in curbing the maternal mortality rate (MMR) — 65 per cent drop reported since 1990 — the country is lagging behind the UN-mandated Millennium Development Goal (MDG) of bringing a 75 per cent decline in the MMR ll 2015. According to the UN Human Rights Commission, “Women's sexual and reproduc ve health is related to mul ple human rights, including the right to life, the right to be free from cruelty, the right to health, the right to privacy, the right to educa on, and the prohibi on of discrimina on”. Despite these obliga ons, viola ons of women's sexual and reproduc ve health rights are frequent. These take many forms including denial of access to services that only women require, or poor quality services and performance of procedures related to women's reproduc ve and sexual health without the woman's consent, including forced steriliza on, forced virginity examina ons, and forced abor on. Women's sexual and reproduc ve health rights are also at risk when they are subjected to early marriage.
1h p://indianexpress.com/ar cle/india/india-others/india-has-highest-number-of-maternal-deaths/
1 Viola ons of women's sexual and reproduc ve health rights are o en deeply engrained in societal values pertaining to women's sexuality. Patriarchal concepts of women's roles within the family mean that women are o en valued based on their ability to reproduce. Early marriage and pregnancy, or repeated pregnancies spaced too closely together, o en as the result of efforts to produce male offspring because of the preference for sons, have a devasta ng impact on women's health, some mes with fatal consequences. Women are also o en blamed for infer lity, suffering ostracism and being subjected various human rights viola ons as a result. With the launch of Na onal Rural Health Mission in India in 2005, a new energy is infused in public health programme in India with focus on reduc on in maternal mortality rate. This led to condi onal cash transfer scheme to promote ins tu onal deliveries. The scheme is named Janani Suraksha Yojna (Mothers Protec on Scheme) which was further expanded in scope in 2011 to provide all services rela ng to mother and child health cashless to all who approach public hospitals. However, there is no corresponding improvement in services other than maternal health services. Therefore, most other important services rela ng to sexual and reproduc ve health remain una ended and are the cause of persistently high prevalence sexual and reproduc ve tract morbidi es. The quality of sexual and reproduc ve health services delivered through public health ins tu ons in India has been a cause of concern all the me and ins tu on based maternal mortali es are not declining. Similarly, female steriliza on for permanent contracep on is also an important issue rela ng to SRHR as women bear unprecedented burden of contracep on mostly in the form of tubectomies. There are strict standard guidelines formulated to conduct tubectomies in India, but in most instances they are being flouted. The project tled “Expanding Access to Reproduc ve Rights: Using Law to Guarantee Reproduc ve Health and Rights in India” implemented by Human Rights Law Network and Prayas Chi orgarh seeks to reach out to those families in the states of Rajasthan, M.P., Bihar, Odisha, Chha sgarh, Delhi, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Nagaland and Assam who could not access sexual and reproduc ve health services for barriers beyond their control and as a result experienced adverse consequences. This book is a collec on of ten case studies of ten different persons from different states of India describing the experiences of different forms of denial of sexual and reproduc ve health services and consequences thereof. These case studies have been documented by the reproduc ve health unit of Human Rights Law Network and a team comprising Kshi z Sisodia, Tushita Mukherjee, Chhaya Pachauli and Narendra Gupta of Prayas. Every effort has been made to the accuracy of the events while wri ng the case studies, however inadvertent mistakes if there are regre ed.
Prayas Human Rights Law Network
2 FAILURE IN PROVIDING MATERNITY SERVICES: MATERNAL AND INFANT DEATH CASE IN MADHYA PRADESH Background The infant mortality rate in Madhya Pradesh is the third highest among the states of India. The infant mortality in NFHS-3 (Na onal Family Health Survey-3) is es mated at 70 deaths before the age of one year per 1,000 live births, down from the NFHS-2 (na onal Family Health Survey- 2) es mate of 88. The under-five mortality rate, at 94 deaths per 1,000 live births, is the second highest in the country. These rates imply that, despite declines in mortality, 1 in 14 children s ll die within the first year of life. Children from scheduled tribes, scheduled castes, and other backward classes are at greater risk of dying than children not belonging to any of these groups. Scheduled-tribe women are less likely than any other caste/tribe group to receive antenatal care. Almost all women belonging to the highest wealth quin le received antenatal care, compared with only two- thirds of women in the lowest wealth quin le. Almost three out of every four births in Madhya Pradesh take place at home; only one in four births (26%) take place in a health facility. Methodology The fact finding was conducted with the objec ve of reviewing all the possible factors that played an important role in Ramkuri's death such as informa on gaps, service gaps, and lacunae in quality of services, negligence and denial of services. The fact finding team conducted: · Site visits to home and health centers · Interviews with family and hospital staff · Observa ons of quality of care provided in different facili es. Fact Finding Team Respondents Fact Finding Team Respondents
1. Goverdhan Lal Yadav, SRHR Bhopal 1. Sanjivan singh – Husband
2. Budh Lal Marko, MPW Podki 2. Santoshi devi – AWW
3. Kamlesh Kumar, HARD Anuppur 3. Durda devi – ASHA
4. Shan bai - Mother - in- law
5. Seema devi –ANM Podki
Case of Maternal death and Infant death Ramkuri's background Ramkuri lived with her three children (two boys and a girl) and her husband, Sanjeevan Singh Baiga. The eldest son studies in standard seven and the girl is in standard three. The third child is a boy of three years. They
1 Na onal Family Health Survey- 2005-2006, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Sta s cs Division, Government of India
3 reside in a remote village of Dumgarh which is near a forest in Pushprajgarh Block, Anupur District. This village has no direct transport facility. To go to a nearest city, one has to travel almost 8 kilometres to get a bus from Podkai. Nobody in the village possesses a four wheeler; hence everyone is dependent on the buses to travel. Even for buying necessary things like ra on, they have to go as far as Amarkantak which is about 22 kilometres from Dumgarh. The nearest Sub health centre is in Podkai which doesn't have any specialized care unit or facili es that government mandates a sub centre to have. The closest Primary Health Centre is in Amarkantak which takes hours for the people of Ramkuri Bai and her husband Sanjeevan Dumgarh to reach. The buses are in bad shape and the roads are not very smooth. For a pa ent it is highly uncomfortable to travel in such a bus. Ramkuri's family lives in a kutchha house made of mud. They have one room where one half is occupied by two cows and other half is u lized by them for cooking, ea ng and sleeping. They do not have any func onal Right to Life The cons tu on under ar cle 21 guarantees that toilet; therefore they use forest area for cleaning and everyone everywhere has the right to live with bathing. They use an old rug to sleep and have few dignity'. As an extension of it, Ar cle 21 also rugged sheets to cover themselves. They do not have protects the right to safe pregnancy. any assets other than the cows. They use earthen utensils to eat and store water in earthen pots. There is no regular source of water for them. They have a big food container made of mud where they store cereal but that container is usually empty. Hunger is a huge problem that they face almost every day. Ramkuri and Sanjeevan both used to work as labourers and his husband con nues to work as one. Both used to set out for work early and come home a er the dark with meagre wage in their hands. They would spend the money in buying food for their children and their minimum requirements of school. Many a mes Ramkuri and Sanjeevan would go to sleep on an empty stomach. In their absence, Sanjeevan's mother used to take care of the children. Ramkuri got married to Sanjeevan when she was 18 years old. Her first pregnancy was at nineteen. Without much complica on she had a normal delivery. At 21, she delivered again. A er four years when she was 25, she gave birth to another child. The children were born malnourished but they survived. When she got pregnant for the fourth me, life took a huge turn for Ramkuri and Sanjeevan. She couldn't survive the delivery and nor did the child survive. Ramkuri and her family are unaware of the various schemes of JSSK and JSY that guarantees safe pregnancy. Hospital being at a Sanjeevan and his two children
4 long distance leads to failure of implementa on of such schemes. There is no one to provide care and educa on to pregnant women of villages like Dumgarh, far from any city.
Factors leading to death of Ramkuri Bai
Deaths of Ramkuri Bai and her new born child is a clear illustra on of u er negligence, apathy and insensi vity of health care providers from ASHA to the staff at the district hospital Annupur. The medical and health department of Annupur district has completely failed in complying with the norms laid down in JSSK and JSY for safe motherhood. Village health register and records of Anganwadi centre make it explicit that:
- Her pregnancy was registered when she was seven months pregnant and the norm is that confirma on for pregnancy should be done soon a er a woman in a heterosexual rela onship misses her menstrual period and then on confirma on she is registered as early as possible and certainly in the first trimester.
As a result of very late registra on of Ramkuri, she could not be examined for the growth of foetus, haemoglobin, blood pressure, urine at intervals which was required and mandated. She could not be counselled for diet, rest, work etc. In the absence of her registra on at Aganwari centre she was deprived of the supplementary nutri on (Take Home Ra on THR) which was an important requirement for her. It is also not clear how her last menstrual period (LMP) and expected date of delivery (EDD) were calculated because her first contact with the health workers took place when she was in advanced stage of pregnancy. Since Ramkuri had low haemoglobin and low body mass index (BMI); certainly the foetus she carried was small for gesta onal age (SGA). In such a situa on Ramkuri should have been admi ed and kept under medical supervision even if the medical staff found that she is s ll not due for delivery. While Ramkuri was examined by staff nurse/ANM at the hospital and a er conduc ng primary examina on of her abdomen she was asked to go back home in-spite of clear complica on of swelling and anaemia.
Since her pregnancy was registered when she was about JSSK Guidelines seven months pregnant, opportunity for all the possible “Free transport from home to health measures required to be taken for safe motherhood were ins tu on” lost. The baby she delivered in full public glare in a corner at the bus stand Annupur is an abominable tes mony of the fact that the public health system downright failed in responding to ensure safe motherhood to Ramkuri and her new borne.
There was extreme delay in her pregnancy registra on which further kept her deprived of all the antenatal services which she should have received during the course of pregnancy. There were no home visits nor could she get adequate Take Home Ra on (THR) from Anganwari Centre during her pregnancy and later on.
Failure from the medical team to ensure safe delivery and save life Death of Ramkuri also le behind various ques on on present health care system. The amount of negligence shown by the medical staff at various levels is no doubt one of the main reasons for the death of both mother and child in this case. Ramkuri Bai was referred from one place to another despite pain in her abdomen. She
5 had clear signs of high risk pregnancy like the swelling on her body, reports indica ng a low HB level s ll no medical centre took the right measures to deal with the case. There were no doctors to a end her. Even when the MTC card clearly showed the date of delivery she was asked to get back home. She was provided with no ambulance facility and was bound to take public transport in that acute labor pain. Hospital did not inform the family about any of the rights en tled to them under the JSY and JSSK.
Date Par culars (2015)
1st April Ramkuri bai went to PHC Amarkan tak which was about 20 kms from her village because of acute abdominal pain. She went there by a private jeep. She was examined by the staff there and was asked to return home as she s ll had days le for her delivery and was given iron sucrose, IV saline and gave some medicines a long with iron tablets as reported by family.
15th April Ramkuri bai and ASHA worker Kusum Dhurve went to PHC Amarkantak a er Ramkuri started having labor pains at about 09:30 AM and ASHA called 108 which reached a er some me. The medical officer at the PHC referred her to CHC Pushprajgarh. She was
not advised during her ANC to go to higher level facility (CHC or district hospital) at the