THE AUDITORY SYSTEM the Central Auditory System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE AUDITORY SYSTEM the Central Auditory System THE AUDITORY SYSTEM The Central Auditory System • Each auditory nerve sends information to the cochlear nucleus. • From there, projections diverge to many different pathways. The Central Auditory System • There are many parallel pathways in the auditory brainstem. • The binaural system receives input from both ears. • The monaural system receives input from one ear only. Each set of auditory pathways has a specialized function The cochlear nucleus is the first stage in the central auditory pathway • Each auditory nerve fiber diverges to three divisions of the cochlear nucleus. This means that there Are three tonotopic maps In the cochlear nucleus. Each map provides a separate set of pathways. Each division of the cochlear nucleus contains specialized cell types • Different cell types receive different types of synaptic endings, and respond differently to the same stimulus. Neurons in the cochlear nucleus (and at higher levels) transform the incoming signal in many different ways. • The auditory nerve input is strictly excitatory (glutamate). Some neurons in the cochlear nucleus are inhibitory (GABA or glycine). • Auditory nerve discharge patterns are converted to many other types of temporal pattern. • There is a progressive increase in the range of response latencies. Changes in response pattern • The stereotyped auditory nerve discharge is converted to many different temporal response patterns. • Each pattern emphasizes different information. Increase in range of latencies • Each synapse adds approximately 1 ms latency. • Any integrative process that requires time adds latency. The superior olive and processing of sound localization cues • Cues for sound localization in the horizontal plane: • Interaural level difference • Interaural time difference Interaural Intensity Differences (IIDs) • For wavelengths less than head diameter, the head casts a partial or total sound “shadow”. • The difference in sound intensity between the two ears is the interaural intensity difference (IID). • IID varies as a function of sound source position Interaural Time Differences (ITDs) • For wavelengths greater than head diameter, there is no sound shadow, but the sound may reach the two ears at slightly different times. • The difference in timing between the two ears is the interaural time difference (ITD). • ITD varies as a function of sound source position. The superior olivary complex receives input from both cochlear nuclei • The medial superior olive (MSO) receives excitatory input from both ears. • The lateral superior olive (LSO) receives excitatory input from the ipsilateral ear and inhibitory input from the contralateral ear. The duplex theory of sound localization • The cues that are available suggest that we use two different mechanisms for localizing sound sources: • Interaural Intensity Differences (ILDs) for high frequency sounds • Interaural Time Differences (ITDs) for low frequency sounds VIA AUDITIVA CORTEZA AUDITIVA TÁLAMO AUDITIVO COLÍCULO INFERIOR NÚCLEOS DEL LEMNISCO LATERAL NÚCLEOS COCLEARES COMPLEJO OLIVAR SUPERIOR ESTRUCTURA DE LOS NÚCLEOS DEL LEMNISCO LATERAL DEL GATO NDLL VNLL Coronal Plane IC IC Petrol Station DNLL VNLL From CN and SOC From NLL Neurotrasmitters TEMPORAL PROCESSING includes • Neural representation of time-varying stimulus features • Generation of a temporal pattern of neural activity from stimulus properties that are not temporal in nature. • Time-based neural computations or other operations. Neural Representation of Time-Varying Information: Some Examples Onset or sustained responses provide time markers for temporal features of a stimulus, e.g. onset time and/or duration. There may be synchrony of responses within a neural population. onset sustained Many neurons at early stages of the auditory system respond in a phaselocked pattern to each cycle of a low frequency tone or each cycle of a tone that is periodically modulated in amplitude or frequency. The temporal pattern of response provides real-time information about the fine structure of sound. What Happens to Temporal Patterns of Neural Activity in Sensory Systems? • The original temporal pattern that directly reflects stimulus timing may be retained. Any neuron can transmit this information. • The original temporal pattern may be converted to a place code. This means that activity in a specific neuron signals that a specific temporal pattern occurred. The activity in this case does not need to reflect stimulus timing properties. • The original temporal pattern may be converted to a hybrid spatio-temporal code in which specific neurons are active and fire in specific temporal patterns. The Central Nervous System Performs Storage, Retrieval, and Recombination of Temporal Information. • Short-term storage provides context or sets up a pattern of expectation. • Long-term storage provides templates for recognition of commonly encountered temporal patterns. • Specific patterns of sensory stimuli can evoke specific spatiotemporal patterns of motor activity. All of the auditory structures and pathways in the central nervous system participate in some aspect of temporal processing. Green arrows show the cochlear nucleus (CN) and inferior colliculus (IC). They also indicate the plane of section in the next slide where the laleral lemniscus nuclei are shown. The Nuclei of the Lateral Lemniscus (NLL) are an important part of the pathway for analyzing temporal patterns of sound. Frontal section through the brain of a bat shows the large NLL complex. In animals such as the cat, the nuclei of the lateral lemniscus are smaller relative to total brain size, and cell types are not as well segregated. VIA AUDITIVA CORTEZA AUDITIVA TÁLAMO AUDITIVO COLÍCULO INFERIOR NÚCLEOS DEL LEMNISCO LATERAL NÚCLEOS COCLEARES COMPLEJO OLIVAR SUPERIOR ESTRUCTURA DE LOS NÚCLEOS DEL LEMNISCO LATERAL DEL GATO NDLL VNLL 31 kHz. CASE OO/122 Fluorescein 110µm VCN 30.5 kHz. 160µm Rodhamine 200µm Deep DCN 100µm Case 00/034 Case 97/114 CASECASE 00/12200/122 Coronal DCNDCN-30.5-30.5 kHz.kHz. Sagittal Horizontal Slicing VCNVCN-31-31 kHz.kHz. (270 µm. thick) D M V D D R M M C CASECASE 00/12100/121 Coronal DCNDCN-1.8-1.8 kHz.kHz. Sagittal Horizontal Slicing DCNDCN-1.7-1.7 kHz.kHz. (200 µm. thick) D M V D D M M C C Coronal Sagittal Horizontal L C CASECASE 00/12100/121 DCNDCN-1.8-1.8 kHz.kHz. D D DCNDCN-1.7-1.7 kHzkHz M C CASECASE 97/11497/114 Coronal VCNVCN-3-3 kHz.kHz. Sagittal Horizontal Slicing DCNDCN-6-6 kHz.kHz. (230 µm. thick) D M R V M D D M C 97/114 00/121 3 kHz. vs. 6kHz. 1.8 kHz. vs. 1.7kHz. Segregated Overlaping axonal plexus axonal plexus Lateral view D D C C 1.8 kHz. vs. 1.7kHz. 3 kHz. vs. 6kHz. TONOTOPICAL ORGANIZATION OF CNC AFFERENCES 30.5 / 31 kHz. 1.7/1.8 kHz. WIRING DIAGRAM Dorsal Middle Ventral ESTRUCTURA DE LOS NÚCLEOS DEL LEMNISCO LATERAL DEL GATO ESTRUCTURA DE LOS NÚCLEOS DEL LEMNISCO LATERAL DEL GATO ESTRUCTURA DE LOS NÚCLEOS DEL LEMNISCO LATERAL DEL GATO ESTRUCTURA DE LOS NÚCLEOS DEL LEMNISCO LATERAL DEL GATO The intermediate and ventral divisions of the NLL (INLL and VLL) are predominantly monaural, receiving excitatory input from the contralateral cochlear nucleus (AVCN and PVCN) and inhibitory input from the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) The IC receives direct projections from the cochlear nucleus (DCN and AVCN) as well as projections via the INLL and VNLL. 6 µm 20 µm Neuron Types‐DNLL Neuron Types‐VCLL The lower brainstem auditory pathways perform a number of transformations that are important for temporal processing: • Change from excitation to inhibition • Change in discharge pattern • Increase in response latency • Selectivity for behaviorally relevant sound patterns. Change From Excitation to Inhibition All input from the auditory nerve is glutamatergic and excitatory. Fibers diverge to different cell types which in turn provide direct or indirect excitatory or inhibitory input to cells in the NLL complex. The firing of the NLL neuron (or IC neuron) is determined by the relative strengths and timing of convergent inputs, which may add together or cancel each other. Each division of the NLL has characteristic cell types and characteristic discharge patterns. Sustained, non- adapting response Single-spike onset response Chopper response The range of latencies increases at each stage of processing up through the level of the IC. There is considerable overlap in the ranges of neurons’ latencies at every stage of the central auditory system. This means that a single brief sound causes a prolonged wave of activity that is simultaneously present at all stages. Delay lines Neurons with different latencies form systems of delay lines that provide a mechanism for comparing or otherwise integrating information about sounds that occur at different times. This is important for analyzing temporal patterns, including speech. The nuclei of the lateral lemniscus provide both excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the IC. These inputs have different latencies and time courses. Blue = monaural Red = binaural A single neuron in the IC may receive many inputs with very different characteristics. There is convergence of excitatory and inhibitory inputs with different latiencies, time courses, and tuning. As a result of this convergence, many neurons in the IC are selective for specific temporal features of patterns of sound. IC neurons may be selective for: • Amplitude • Sound duration • Interstimulus interval • Direction of frequency modulation • Rate of sinusoidal amplitude modulation • Multiple parameters of sinusoidal frequency modulation Synaptic inputs interact with IC neurons’ intrinsic properties. The resulting computations are important for creating selectivity to temporal features, including those important for speech. IC neurons act as coincidence detectors (or anti-coincidence detectors) in that they respond only to certain combinations of inputs that arrive in specific time relationships. A Case Study in Temporal Pattern Analysis: Delay-Tuned Neurons A Some neurons in the IC respond selectively to two sounds separated by B a specific interval, or “delay” between one sound and the next (A- C C). They respond poorly or not at all to a single sound (D). D Another Case Study: Duration Tuning.
Recommended publications
  • Guide to Sensory Processing.Pdf
    Guide to Sensory Processing Prepared by Allison Travnik, MSOTS Level II Fieldwork Student Project Kavitha N Krishnan MS OTR/L Fieldwork Instructor Sensory Processing In order to understand what is going on around us, we need to organize all of the incoming sensory information (Ayres, 2005). The sensory information involves what we see, smell, taste, hear, feel on our body, where our body is in relation to others, and how well we are balanced. This is a lot of information that our brains need to process in order to engage in productive behavior, learn, and form accurate perceptions. Proprioceptive Where are body is in space Tactile Auditory What we feel The noise on our skin around us Sensory Smell Processing The Sight difference What we see scents around us around us Oral Sensory Processing Vestibular The sensations Jean Ayres developed the sensory Our sense of Disorder + balance that food give integration (SI) theory. SI gives us in our mouth meaning to what our senses are recognizing. When the sensations are not being organized properly may notice some of the same qualities in the brain, Ayres compared it to about yourself.It is important to a traffic jam. The traffic jam of remember that everyone has some sensory information can lead to quirks about their sensory processing learning difficulties and problem whether it be a sensitivity to loud behavior (Ayres, 2005). Children noises or dislike of light touch. with Sensory Processing Disorder However the identification of SPD is (SPD) are struggling with this reserved for individuals whose traffic jam. sensory quirks are outside of the Sensory processing is a typical range and affect their daily dynamic and complex theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Perforated Eardrum
    Vinod K. Anand, MD, FACS Nose and Sinus Clinic Perforated Eardrum A perforated eardrum is a hole or rupture m the eardrum, a thin membrane which separated the ear canal and the middle ear. The medical term for eardrum is tympanic membrane. The middle ear is connected to the nose by the eustachian tube. A perforated eardrum is often accompanied by decreased hearing and occasional discharge. Paih is usually not persistent. Causes of Eardrum Perforation The causes of perforated eardrum are usually from trauma or infection. A perforated eardrum can occur: if the ear is struck squarely with an open hand with a skull fracture after a sudden explosion if an object (such as a bobby pin, Q-tip, or stick) is pushed too far into the ear canal. as a result of hot slag (from welding) or acid entering the ear canal Middle ear infections may cause pain, hearing loss and spontaneous rupture (tear) of the eardrum resulting in a perforation. In this circumstance, there may be infected or bloody drainage from the ear. In medical terms, this is called otitis media with perforation. On rare occasions a small hole may remain in the eardrum after a previously placed P.E. tube (pressure equalizing) either falls out or is removed by the physician. Most eardrum perforations heal spontaneously within weeks after rupture, although some may take up to several months. During the healing process the ear must be protected from water and trauma. Those eardrum perforations which do not heal on their own may require surgery. Effects on Hearing from Perforated Eardrum Usually, the larger the perforation, the greater the loss of hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Sensory Processing: Looking at Children's Behavior Through the Lens of Sensory Processing
    Understanding Sensory Processing: Looking at Children’s Behavior Through the Lens of Sensory Processing Communities of Practice in Autism September 24, 2009 Charlottesville, VA Dianne Koontz Lowman, Ed.D. Early Childhood Coordinator Region 5 T/TAC James Madison University MSC 9002 Harrisonburg, VA 22807 [email protected] ______________________________________________________________________________ Dianne Koontz Lowman/[email protected]/2008 Page 1 Looking at Children’s Behavior Through the Lens of Sensory Processing Do you know a child like this? Travis is constantly moving, pushing, or chewing on things. The collar of his shirt and coat are always wet from chewing. When talking to people, he tends to push up against you. Or do you know another child? Sierra does not like to be hugged or kissed by anyone. She gets upset with other children bump up against her. She doesn’t like socks with a heel or toe seam or any tags on clothes. Why is Travis always chewing? Why doesn’t Sierra liked to be touched? Why do children react differently to things around them? These children have different ways of reacting to the things around them, to sensations. Over the years, different terms (such as sensory integration) have been used to describe how children deal with the information they receive through their senses. Currently, the term being used to describe children who have difficulty dealing with input from their senses is sensory processing disorder. _____________________________________________________________________ Sensory Processing Disorder
    [Show full text]
  • SENSORY MOTOR COORDINATION in ROBONAUT Richard Alan Peters
    SENSORY MOTOR COORDINATION IN ROBONAUT 5 Richard Alan Peters 11 Vanderbilt University School of Engineering JSC Mail Code: ER4 30 October 2000 Robert 0. Ambrose Robotic Systems Technology Branch Automation, Robotics, & Simulation Division Engineering Directorate Richard Alan Peters II Robert 0. Ambrose SENSORY MOTOR COORDINATION IN ROBONAUT Final Report NASNASEE Summer Faculty Fellowship Program - 2000 Johnson Space Center Prepared By: Richard Alan Peters II, Ph.D. Academic Rank: Associate Professor University and Department: Vanderbilt University Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Nashville, TN 37235 NASNJSC Directorate: Engineering Division: Automation, Robotics, & Simulation Branch: Robotic Systems Technology JSC Colleague: Robert 0. Ambrose Date Submitted: 30 October 2000 Contract Number: NAG 9-867 13-1 ABSTRACT As a participant of the year 2000 NASA Summer Faculty Fellowship Program, I worked with the engineers of the Dexterous Robotics Laboratory at NASA Johnson Space Center on the Robonaut project. The Robonaut is an articulated torso with two dexterous arms, left and right five-fingered hands, and a head with cameras mounted on an articulated neck. This advanced space robot, now dnven only teleoperatively using VR gloves, sensors and helmets, is to be upgraded to a thinking system that can find, in- teract with and assist humans autonomously, allowing the Crew to work with Robonaut as a (junior) member of their team. Thus, the work performed this summer was toward the goal of enabling Robonaut to operate autonomously as an intelligent assistant to as- tronauts. Our underlying hypothesis is that a robot can deveZop intelligence if it learns a set of basic behaviors ([.e., reflexes - actions tightly coupled to sensing) and through experi- ence learns how to sequence these to solve problems or to accomplish higher-level tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Brainstem Exclusive of the Pyramids Themselves, Which Were Blood-Supplied Through the Intact Basilar Artery
    NOTE ON CONVERGENCE OF PYRAMIDAL AND PRIMARY AFFERENT IMPULSES IN THE SPINAL CORD OF THE CAT BY DAVID P. C. LLOYD THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY Communicated December 20, 1967 The burden of this note is to present an example of observations long since made but not previously published. The immediate stimulus for presenting them now was provided by the paper by R. Porter' in which a combination of im- pulses of cortical and of lingual nerve origin was shown by convergence to facilitate the response of interneurons in or near the spinal trigeminal nucleus to a level of activity greater than that of the sum of responses elicited by lingual nerve stimu- lation and corticospinal stimulation, respectively, in isolation. Experiments of the sort now to be described concern the convergence upon interneurons in the lumbar spinal enlargement of pyramidal tract impulses and primary afferent im- pulses engendered by stimulation of the seventh lumbar dorsal root. To an ex- tent these experiments are confirmatory, with respect to another location in the neuraxis, of the observations of Porter,' but they demonstrate, in addition, how one pathway by occlusion may pre-empt the interneuron from service to the other pathway. In a prior paper2 convergence at the internuncial level was im- plied by virtue of pyramidal tract facilitatory influence upon disynaptic (three- neuron-arc) reflexes in the absence of any influence upon monosynaptic (two- neuron-arc) reflexes (ref. 2, Figs. 9 and 10). Preparation and procedure were discussed in the previous publication2 and need not be restated here, except to note that the pyramidal tract impulses were "pure" because the bulbar pyramid was stimulated rostral to a lesion that sev- ered the entire brainstem exclusive of the pyramids themselves, which were blood-supplied through the intact basilar artery.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditory System & Hearing
    Auditory System & Hearing Chapters 9 part II Lecture 17 Jonathan Pillow Sensation & Perception (PSY 345 / NEU 325) Fall 2017 1 Cochlea: physical device tuned to frequency! • place code: tuning of different parts of the cochlea to different frequencies 2 The auditory nerve (AN): fibers stimulated by inner hair cells • Frequency selectivity: Clearest when sounds are very faint 3 Threshold tuning curves for 6 neurons (threshold = lowest intensity that will give rise to a response) Characteristic frequency - frequency to which the neuron is most sensitive threshold(dB) frequency (kHz) 4 Information flow in the auditory pathway • Cochlear nucleus: first brain stem nucleus at which afferent auditory nerve fibers synapse • Superior olive: brainstem region thalamus MGN in the auditory pathway where inputs from both ears converge • Inferior colliculus: midbrain nucleus in the auditory pathway • Medial geniculate nucleus (MGN): part of the thalamus that relays auditory signals to the cortex 5 • Primary auditory cortex (A1): First cortical area for processing audition (in temporal lobe) • Belt & Parabelt areas: areas beyond A1, where neurons respond to more complex characteristics of sounds 6 Basic Structure of the Mammalian Auditory System Comparing overall structure of auditory and visual systems: • Auditory system: Large proportion of processing before A1 • Visual system: Large proportion of processing after V1 7 Basic Structure of the Mammalian Auditory System Tonotopic organization: neurons organized spatially in order of preferred frequency •
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide Medical Terminology by Thea Liza Batan About the Author
    Study Guide Medical Terminology By Thea Liza Batan About the Author Thea Liza Batan earned a Master of Science in Nursing Administration in 2007 from Xavier University in Cincinnati, Ohio. She has worked as a staff nurse, nurse instructor, and level department head. She currently works as a simulation coordinator and a free- lance writer specializing in nursing and healthcare. All terms mentioned in this text that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Use of a term in this text shouldn’t be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. Copyright © 2017 by Penn Foster, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. Requests for permission to make copies of any part of the work should be mailed to Copyright Permissions, Penn Foster, 925 Oak Street, Scranton, Pennsylvania 18515. Printed in the United States of America CONTENTS INSTRUCTIONS 1 READING ASSIGNMENTS 3 LESSON 1: THE FUNDAMENTALS OF MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY 5 LESSON 2: DIAGNOSIS, INTERVENTION, AND HUMAN BODY TERMS 28 LESSON 3: MUSCULOSKELETAL, CIRCULATORY, AND RESPIRATORY SYSTEM TERMS 44 LESSON 4: DIGESTIVE, URINARY, AND REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM TERMS 69 LESSON 5: INTEGUMENTARY, NERVOUS, AND ENDOCRINE S YSTEM TERMS 96 SELF-CHECK ANSWERS 134 © PENN FOSTER, INC. 2017 MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY PAGE III Contents INSTRUCTIONS INTRODUCTION Welcome to your course on medical terminology. You’re taking this course because you’re most likely interested in pursuing a health and science career, which entails ­proficiency­in­communicating­with­healthcare­professionals­such­as­physicians,­nurses,­ or dentists.
    [Show full text]
  • Imaging of the Confused Patient: Toxic Metabolic Disorders Dara G
    Imaging of the Confused Patient: Toxic Metabolic Disorders Dara G. Jamieson, M.D. Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY The patient who presents with either acute or subacute confusion, in the absence of a clearly defined speech disorder and focality on neurological examination that would indicate an underlying mass lesion, needs to be evaluated for a multitude of neurological conditions. Many of the conditions that produce the recent onset of alteration in mental status, that ranges from mild confusion to florid delirium, may be due to infectious or inflammatory conditions that warrant acute intervention such as antimicrobial drugs, steroids or plasma exchange. However, some patients with recent onset of confusion have an underlying toxic-metabolic disorders indicating a specific diagnosis with need for appropriate treatment. The clinical presentations of some patients may indicate the diagnosis (e.g. hypoglycemia, chronic alcoholism) while the imaging patterns must be recognized to make the diagnosis in other patients. Toxic-metabolic disorders constitute a group of diseases and syndromes with diverse causes and clinical presentations. Many toxic-metabolic disorders have no specific neuroimaging correlates, either at early clinical stages or when florid symptoms develop. However, some toxic-metabolic disorders have characteristic abnormalities on neuroimaging, as certain areas of the central nervous system appear particularly vulnerable to specific toxins and metabolic perturbations. Areas of particular vulnerability in the brain include: 1) areas of high-oxygen demand (e.g. basal ganglia, cerebellum, hippocampus), 2) the cerebral white matter and 3) the mid-brain. Brain areas of high-oxygen demand are particularly vulnerable to toxins that interfere with cellular respiratory metabolism.
    [Show full text]
  • An EM Study of the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus: Inhibitory, Commissural, Synaptic Connections Between Ascending Auditory Pathways
    The Journal of Neuroscience, March 1989, g(3): 987-982 An EM Study of the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus: Inhibitory, Commissural, Synaptic Connections Between Ascending Auditory Pathways Douglas L. Oliver and Amiram Shneiderman Department of Anatomy, The University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06032 The dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL) and its tions between the nuclei. Crossed inhibitory connections in connections constitute one of the ascending auditory path- the DNLL pathway may be important in regulating the flow ways to the inferior colliculus. One notable feature of this of ascending auditory information. nucleus is the heavy commissural connections between DNLL on opposite sides of the midbrain. These commissural con- The dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL) holds a nections may have a significant impact on the ascending unique position in the auditory system. Astride the fibers of the pathway. In this study, the fine structure of DNLL in the cat lateral lemniscus,DNLL receives most of the sameprojections and its commissural connections were examined. Both an- that ascendto the inferior colliculus (Glendenning et al., 1981; terograde and retrograde transport methods were used si- Shneiderman et al., 1988); and DNLL also projects bilaterally multaneously at the EM level. Injections of 3H-leucine mixed to the inferior colliculus. Thus, the combined inputs and outputs with WGA-HRP were made in one DNLL. After axonal trans- of DNLL form a multisynaptic pathway, parallel to the other port, EM autoradiographic methods were used to identify the ascending pathways to the inferior colliculus (Goldberg and anterogradely labeled axonal endings from the opposite Moore, 1967; van Noort, 1969; Roth et al., 1978; Adams, 1979; DNLL.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensory Change Following Motor Learning
    A. M. Green, C. E. Chapman, J. F. Kalaska and F. Lepore (Eds.) Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 191 ISSN: 0079-6123 Copyright Ó 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 2 Sensory change following motor learning { k { { Andrew A. G. Mattar , Sazzad M. Nasir , Mohammad Darainy , and { } David J. Ostry , ,* { Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada { Shahed University, Tehran, Iran } Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA k The Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA Abstract: Here we describe two studies linking perceptual change with motor learning. In the first, we document persistent changes in somatosensory perception that occur following force field learning. Subjects learned to control a robotic device that applied forces to the hand during arm movements. This led to a change in the sensed position of the limb that lasted at least 24 h. Control experiments revealed that the sensory change depended on motor learning. In the second study, we describe changes in the perception of speech sounds that occur following speech motor learning. Subjects adapted control of speech movements to compensate for loads applied to the jaw by a robot. Perception of speech sounds was measured before and after motor learning. Adapted subjects showed a consistent shift in perception. In contrast, no consistent shift was seen in control subjects and subjects that did not adapt to the load. These studies suggest that motor learning changes both sensory and motor function. Keywords: motor learning; sensory plasticity; arm movements; proprioception; speech motor control; auditory perception. Introduction the human motor system and, likewise, to skill acquisition in the adult nervous system.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinal Cord Organization
    Lecture 4 Spinal Cord Organization The spinal cord . Afferent tract • connects with spinal nerves, through afferent BRAIN neuron & efferent axons in spinal roots; reflex receptor interneuron • communicates with the brain, by means of cell ascending and descending pathways that body form tracts in spinal white matter; and white matter muscle • gives rise to spinal reflexes, pre-determined gray matter Efferent neuron by interneuronal circuits. Spinal Cord Section Gross anatomy of the spinal cord: The spinal cord is a cylinder of CNS. The spinal cord exhibits subtle cervical and lumbar (lumbosacral) enlargements produced by extra neurons in segments that innervate limbs. The region of spinal cord caudal to the lumbar enlargement is conus medullaris. Caudal to this, a terminal filament of (nonfunctional) glial tissue extends into the tail. terminal filament lumbar enlargement conus medullaris cervical enlargement A spinal cord segment = a portion of spinal cord that spinal ganglion gives rise to a pair (right & left) of spinal nerves. Each spinal dorsal nerve is attached to the spinal cord by means of dorsal and spinal ventral roots composed of rootlets. Spinal segments, spinal root (rootlets) nerve roots, and spinal nerves are all identified numerically by th region, e.g., 6 cervical (C6) spinal segment. ventral Sacral and caudal spinal roots (surrounding the conus root medullaris and terminal filament and streaming caudally to (rootlets) reach corresponding intervertebral foramina) collectively constitute the cauda equina. Both the spinal cord (CNS) and spinal roots (PNS) are enveloped by meninges within the vertebral canal. Spinal nerves (which are formed in intervertebral foramina) are covered by connective tissue (epineurium, perineurium, & endoneurium) rather than meninges.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Ear Infection (Otitis Interna) in Dogs
    Hurricane Harvey Client Education Kit Inner Ear Infection (Otitis Interna) in Dogs My dog has just been diagnosed with an inner ear infection. What is this? Inflammation of the inner ear is called otitis interna, and it is most often caused by an infection. The infectious agent is most commonly bacterial, although yeast and fungus can also be implicated in an inner ear infection. If your dog has ear mites in the external ear canal, this can ultimately cause a problem in the inner ear and pose a greater risk for a bacterial infection. Similarly, inner ear infections may develop if disease exists in one ear canal or when a benign polyp is growing from the middle ear. A foreign object, such as grass seed, may also set the stage for bacterial infection in the inner ear. Are some dogs more susceptible to inner ear infection? Dogs with long, heavy ears seem to be predisposed to chronic ear infections that ultimately lead to otitis interna. Spaniel breeds, such as the Cocker spaniel, and hound breeds, such as the bloodhound and basset hound, are the most commonly affected breeds. Regardless of breed, any dog with a chronic ear infection that is difficult to control may develop otitis interna if the eardrum (tympanic membrane) is damaged as it allows bacteria to migrate down into the inner ear. "Dogs with long, heavy ears seem to bepredisposed to chronic ear infections that ultimately lead to otitis interna." Excessively vigorous cleaning of an infected external ear canal can sometimes cause otitis interna. Some ear cleansers are irritating to the middle and inner ear and can cause signs of otitis interna if the eardrum is damaged and allows some of the solution to penetrate too deeply.
    [Show full text]