DOCSLIB.ORG

STACEY W Nuclear Reactor Physics (Wiley, 2Nd Ed. 2004) Chapter 6 - Fuel Burnup

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STACEY W Nuclear Reactor Physics (Wiley, 2Nd Ed. 2004) Chapter 6 - Fuel Burnup STACEY W Nuclear Reactor Physics (Wiley, 2nd ed. 2004) Chapter 6 - Fuel Burnup . 197 6 Fuel Burnup The long-term changes in the properties of a nuclear reactor over its lifetime are determined by the changes in composition due to fuel burnup and the manner in which these are compensated. The economics of nuclear power is strongly affected by the efficiency of fuel utilization to produce power, which in turn is affected by these long-term changes associated with fuel burnup. In this chapter we describe the changes in fuel composition that take place in an operating reactor and their effects on the reactor, the effects of the samarium and xenon fission products with large thermal neutron cross sections, the conversion of fertile material to fission- able material by neutron transmutation, the effects of using plutonium from spent fuel and from weapons surplus as fuel, the production of radioactive waste, the extraction of the residual energy from spent fuel, and the destruction of long-lived actinides. 6.1 Changes in Fuel Composition The initial composition of a fuel element will depend on the source of the fuel. For reactors operating on the uranium cycle, fuel developed directly from natural ura- nium will contain a mixture of 234U, 235U, and 238U, with the fissile 235Ucontent varying from 0.72% (for natural uranium) to more than 90%, depending on the enrichment. Recycled fuel from reprocessing plants will also contain the various isotopes produced in the transmutation–decay process of uranium. Reactors oper- ating on the thorium cycle will contain 232Th and 233Uor235U, and if the fuel is from a reprocessing plant, isotopes produced in the transmutation–decay process of thorium. During the operation of a nuclear reactor a number of changes occur in the composition of the fuel. The various fuel nuclei are transmuted by neutron cap- ture and subsequent decay. For a uranium-fueled reactor, this process produces a variety of transuranic elements in the actinide series of the periodic table. For a thorium-fueled reactor, a number of uranium isotopes are produced. The fission event destroys a fissile nucleus, of course, and in the process produces two inter- mediate mass fission products. The fission products tend to be neutron-rich and 198 6 Fuel Burnup Fig. 6.1 Transmutation–decay chains for 238Uand232Th. (From Ref. 3; used with permission of Taylor & Francis.) subsequently decay by beta or neutron emission (usually accompanied by gamma emission) and undergo neutron capture to be transmuted into a heavier isotope, which itself undergoes radioactive decay and neutron transmutation, and so on. The fissile nuclei also undergo neutron transmutation via radiative capture fol- lowed by decay or further transmutation. Fuel Transmutation–Decay Chains Uranium-235, present 0.72% in natural uranium, is the only naturally occurring isotope that is fissionable by thermal neutrons. However, three other fissile (fis- sionable by thermal neutrons) isotopes of major interest as nuclear reactor fuel are produced as the result of transmutation–decay chains. Isotopes that can be con- verted to fissile isotopes by neutron transmutation and decay are known as fertile isotopes. 239Pu and 241Pu are products of the transmutation–decay chain beginning with the fertile isotope 238U, and 233U is a product of the transmutation–decay 6.1 Changes in Fuel Composition 199 chain beginning with the fertile isotope 232Th. These two transmutation–decay chains are shown in Fig. 6.1. Isotopes are in rows with horizontal arrows rep- resenting (n, γ ) transmutation reactions, with the value of the cross section (in barns) shown. Downward arrows indicate β-decay, with the half-lives shown. Ther- mal neutron fission is represented by a dashed diagonal arrow, and the thermal cross section is shown. (Fast fission also occurs but is relatively less important in thermal reactors.) Natural abundances, decay half-lifes, modes of decay, decay energies, spontaneous fission yields, thermal capture and fission cross sections av- eraged over a Maxwellian distribution with kT = 0.0253 eV (σ th), infinite-dilution capture and fission resonance integrals (RIs), and capture and fission cross sec- tions averaged over the fission spectrum (σ χ ) are given in Table 6.1. Fuel Depletion–Transmutation–Decay Equations Concentrations of the various fuel isotopes in a reactor are described by a coupled set of production–destruction equations. We adopt the two-digit superscript con- vention for identifying isotopes in which the first digit is the last digit in the atomic number and the second digit is the last digit in the atomic mass. We represent the nm nm neutron reaction rate by σx ϕn , although the actual calculation may involve a sum over energy groups of such terms. For reactors operating on the uranium cycle, the isotopic concentrations are de- scribed by ∂n24 =−σ 24φn24 ∂t a ∂n25 = σ 24φn24 − σ 25φn25 ∂t γ a ∂n26 = σ 25φn25 − σ 26φn26 + λ36n36 ∂t γ a ec ∂n27 = σ 26φn26 + σ 28 φn28 − λ27n27 ∂t γ n,2n ∂n28 =−σ 28φn28 ∂t a ∂n29 = σ 28φn28 − λ29 + σ 29φ n29 ∂t γ a ∂n36 = σ 37 φn37 − λ36 + σ 36φ n36 ∂t n,2n a ∂n37 = λ27n27 − σ 27φn37 ∂t a ∂n38 = σ 37φn37 − λ38 + σ 38φ n38 ∂t γ a ∂n39 = λ29n29 − λ39 + σ 39φ n39 (6.1) ∂t a 200 6 Fuel Burnup ∂n48 = λ38n38 − σ 48φn48 ∂t a ∂n49 = λ39n39 − σ 49φn49 + σ 48φn48 ∂t a γ ∂n40 = σ 49φn49 − σ 40φn40 + σ 29φn29 + σ 39φn39 ∂t γ a γ γ ∂n41 = σ 40φn40 − λ41 + σ 41φ n41 ∂t γ a ∂n42 = σ 41φn41 − σ 42φn42 ∂t γ a ∂n43 = σ 42φn42 − λ43 + σ 43φ n43 ∂t γ a ∂n51 = λ41n41 − λ51 + σ 51φ n51 ∂t a ∂n52 = σ 51φn51 − σ 52φn52 ∂t γ a ∂n53 = λ43n43 − σ 53φn53 + σ 52φn52 ∂t a γ With respect to Fig. 6.1, a few approximations have been made in writing Eqs. (6.1). 239 240 Theneutroncapturein Utoproduce Ufollowedbythedecay(t1/2 = 14 h) 240 240 into Np and the subsequent decay (t1/2 = 7 min) into Pu is treated as the di- rect production of 240Pu by neutron capture in 239U, and the production of 240Np 239 by neutron capture in Np followed by the subsequent decay (t1/2 = 7 min) of 240Np into 240Pu is treated as the direct production of 240Pu by neutron capture in 239Np. These approximations have the beneficial effect for numerical solution tech- niques of removing short time scales from the set of equations, without sacrificing information of interest on the longer time scale of fuel burnup. For reactors operating on the thorium cycle, the isotopic concentrations are de- scribed by ∂n02 =−σ 02φn02 ∂t a ∂n03 = σ 02φn02 − λ03 + σ 03φ n03 ∂t γ a ∂n13 = λ03n03 − λ13 + σ 13φ n13 ∂t a ∂n22 =− λ22 + σ 22φ n22 ∂t a ∂n23 = σ 22φn22 + λ13n13 − σ 25φn23 ∂t γ a (6.2) ∂n24 = σ 23φn23 + σ 13φn13 − σ 24φn24 ∂t γ γ a 6.1 Changes in Fuel Composition 201 χ f f f 95 22 24 33 92 08 59 31 74 42 11 04 33 01 . σ (Continued) χ γ 072209 1 1 1 17 1 19 1 09 0 1107 0 0 93 0 11 1 091128 0 0 03 0 2 –– –– . σ 0 0 0 f f f − − – – – RI γ 84 94 –––– – – 864 RI − − − th f f f – – – σ 7 52 54 10 346 278 8 2 0 0 2 th γ 418887 469 6 507 138 631 133 774 278 7 0 0 0 35 64 66 173 364 0 144 20 661 7 0 621 2453 259 1032 0 392 1 1084399 49 1835 0 201 940 0 σ 1285 13 643 11 0 (barns) (barns) (barns) (barns) (barns) (barns) 9 9 9 9 8 10 5 − − − − − − − 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 – –– – –––––– – – – – – – –– –– × × × × × × × 6 1 7 0 6 2 . < < < Fission Yield (%) 9 91 77 69 35 0 94 49 1 2 52 3 2 27 57 4 3 39 . 4 4 4 4 4 5 0 0 4 2 0 1 1 0 0 5 1 0 ∗ ∗ α α α α α α α α β β β β β β β β β Mode (MeV) Decay Energy Spontaneous y y y y y y yec y 10 5 5 8 6 9 5 6 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 2 2 2 / / / 1 1 1 d d × × × × × × × × t t t h m d d y m h 41 7 59 46 04 34 75 47 54 14 12 3 1 0 9 5 1 . 1 6 1 2 7 2 6 4 1 2 2 22 24 27 68 23 14 Abundance Cross Section and Decay Data for Fuel Isotopes ThThThPa 100 Pa – U– – U– – U – UU– U– 0.0057 U 0.719 U– U– Np 99.27 NpNp – – – Isotope232 (%) 233 234 233 234 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 236 237 238 Table 6.1 202 6 Fuel Burnup χ f f f 08 99 80 65 36 38 13 46 . σ 1 1 χ γ 1510 2 05 1 12 1 1 09 1 10 23 19 1 –– . σ 0 0 f f f − – – RI γ – 445 RI 1130 − th f f f – – σ th γ 17 33 126458 146274264326 15 401 698532 53 938 154 59 182 8103 180 3 33 303 0 9 1305 576 0 0 0 0 14 0 σ (barns) (barns) (barns) (barns) (barns) (barns) 4 7 7 6 14 − 10 10 − − − − − − 10 10 10 10 10 –– – × 10 10 × × × × 5 . × × 7 4 9 2 . 5 < > Fission Yield (%) 23 35 0 22 72 64 91 61 02 – – –––––– .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Compilation and Evaluation of Fission Yield Nuclear Data Iaea, Vienna, 2000 Iaea-Tecdoc-1168 Issn 1011–4289
    IAEA-TECDOC-1168 Compilation and evaluation of fission yield nuclear data Final report of a co-ordinated research project 1991–1996 December 2000 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Data Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria COMPILATION AND EVALUATION OF FISSION YIELD NUCLEAR DATA IAEA, VIENNA, 2000 IAEA-TECDOC-1168 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2000 Printed by the IAEA in Austria December 2000 FOREWORD Fission product yields are required at several stages of the nuclear fuel cycle and are therefore included in all large international data files for reactor calculations and related applications. Such files are maintained and disseminated by the Nuclear Data Section of the IAEA as a member of an international data centres network. Users of these data are from the fields of reactor design and operation, waste management and nuclear materials safeguards, all of which are essential parts of the IAEA programme. In the 1980s, the number of measured fission yields increased so drastically that the manpower available for evaluating them to meet specific user needs was insufficient. To cope with this task, it was concluded in several meetings on fission product nuclear data, some of them convened by the IAEA, that international co-operation was required, and an IAEA co-ordinated research project (CRP) was recommended. This recommendation was endorsed by the International Nuclear Data Committee, an advisory body for the nuclear data programme of the IAEA. As a consequence, the CRP on the Compilation and Evaluation of Fission Yield Nuclear Data was initiated in 1991, after its scope, objectives and tasks had been defined by a preparatory meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Fissile Material Report 2006 a Table of Contents
    IPF M Global Fis sile Material Report Developing the technical basis for policy initiatives to secure and irreversibly reduce stocks of nuclear weapons and fissile materials 2006 Over the past six decades, our understanding of the nuclear danger has expanded from the threat posed by the vast nuclear arsenals created by the super- powers in the Cold War to encompass the prolifera- tion of nuclear weapons to additional states and now also to terrorist groups. To reduce this danger, it is essential to secure and to sharply reduce all stocks of highly enriched uranium and separated plutonium, the key materials in nuclear weapons, and to limit any further production. The mission of the IPFM is to advance the technical basis for cooperative international policy initiatives to achieve these goals. A report published by Global Fissile The International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM) www.fissilematerials.org Program on Science and Global Security Princeton University Material Report 2006 221 Nassau Street, 2nd Floor Princeton, NJ 08542, USA First report of the International Panel on Fissile Materials First report of the International Panel on Fissile Materials Developing the Technical Basis for Policy Initiatives to Secure and Irreversibly Reduce Stocks of Nuclear Weapons and Fissile Materials www.fissilematerials.org Global Fissile Material Report 2006 a Table of Contents About the IPFM 1 Summary 2 I. Background 5 1 Fissile Materials and Nuclear Weapons 6 2 Nuclear-Weapon and Fissile-Material Stocks 12 3 Production and Disposition of Fissile
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Reactor Realities
    Page 1 of 26 Nuclear Reactor Realities NUCLEAR REACTOR REALITIES (An Australian viewpoint) PREFACE Now that steam ships are no longer common, people tend to forget that nuclear power is just a replacement of coal, oil or gas for heating water to form steam to drive turbines, or of water (hydro) to do so directly. As will be shown in this tract, it is by far the safest way of doing so to generate electricity economically in large quantities – as a marine engineer of my acquaintance is fond of saying. Recently Quantum Market Research released its latest Australian Scan (The Advertiser, Saturday April 17, 2012, p 17). It has been tracking social change by interviewing 2000 Australians annually since 1992. In the concerns in the environment category, “[a]t the top of the list is nuclear accidents and waste disposal” (44.4 per cent), while “global warming” was well down the list of priorities at No 15, with only 27.7 per cent of people surveyed rating the issue as “extremely serious.” Part of the cause of such information must be that people are slowly realising that they have been deluded by publicity about unverified computer models which indicate that man’s emissions of CO2 play a major part in global warming. They have not yet realised that the history of the dangers of civilian nuclear power generation shows the reverse of their images. The topic of nuclear waste disposal is also shrouded in reactor physics mysteries, leading to a mis-placed general fear of the unknown. In this article only nuclear reactors are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Axial Neutron Flux Evaluation in a Tokamak System: a Possible Transmutation Blanket Position for a Fusion-Fission Transm
    Brazilian Journal of Physics ISSN: 0103-9733 [email protected] Sociedade Brasileira de Física Brasil Velasquez, Carlos E.; Barros, Graiciany de P.; Pereira, Claubia; Fortini Veloso, Maria A.; Costa, Antonella L. Axial Neutron Flux Evaluation in a Tokamak System: a Possible Transmutation Blanket Position for a Fusion-Fission Transmutation System Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 42, núm. 3-4, julio-diciembre, 2012, pp. 237-247 Sociedade Brasileira de Física Sâo Paulo, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=46423465009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Braz J Phys (2012) 42:237–247 DOI 10.1007/s13538-012-0081-2 NUCLEAR PHYSICS Axial Neutron Flux Evaluation in a Tokamak System: a Possible Transmutation Blanket Position for a Fusion–Fission Transmutation System Carlos E. Velasquez & Graiciany de P. Barros & Claubia Pereira & Maria A. Fortini Veloso & Antonella L. Costa Received: 28 August 2011 /Published online: 17 May 2012 # Sociedade Brasileira de Física 2012 Abstract A sub-critical advanced reactor based on Tokamak regions more suitable to transmutation were determined. The technology with a D–T fusion neutron source is an innovative results demonstrated that the best zone in which to place a type of nuclear system. Due to the large number of neutrons transmutation blanket is limited by the heat sink and the shield produced by fusion reactions, such a system could be useful in block.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactor Physics
    Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactor Physics E. E. Lewis Professor of Mechanical Engineering McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science Northwestern University AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO ELSEVIER Academie Press is an imprint of Elsevier Contents Preface xiii 1 Nuclear Reactions 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Nuclear Reaction Fundamentals 2 Reaction Equations 3 Notation 5 Energetics 5 1.3 The Curve of Binding Energy 7 1.4 Fusion Reactions 8 1.5 Fission Reactions 9 Energy Release and Dissipation 10 Neutron Multiplication 12 Fission Products 13 1.6 Fissile and Fertile Materials 16 1.7 Radioactive Decay 18 Saturation Activity 20 Decay Chains 21 2 Neutron Interactions 29 2.1 Introduction 29 2.2 Neutron Cross Sections 29 Microscopic and Macroscopic Cross Sections 30 Uncollided Flux 32 Nuclide Densities 33 Enriched Uranium 35 Cross Section Calculation Example 36 Reaction Types 36 2.3 Neutron Energy Range 38 2.4 Cross Section Energy Dependence 40 Compound Nucleus Formation 41 Resonance Cross Sections 42 Threshold Cross Sections 46 Fissionable Materials 47 vii viii Contents 2.5 Neutron Scattering 48 Elastic Scattering 49 Slowing Down Decrement 50 Inelastic Scattering 52 3 Neutron Distributions in Energy 57 3.1 Introduction 57 3.2 Nuclear Fuel Properties 58 3.3 Neutron Moderators 61 3.4 Neutron Energy Spectra 63 Fast Neutrons 65 Neutron Slowing Down 66 Thermal Neutrons 70 Fast and Thermal Reactor Spectra 72 3.5
    [Show full text]
  • Module01 Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory
    Module I Nuclear physics and reactor theory International Atomic Energy Agency, May 2015 v1.0 Background In 1991, the General Conference (GC) in its resolution RES/552 requested the Director General to prepare 'a comprehensive proposal for education and training in both radiation protection and in nuclear safety' for consideration by the following GC in 1992. In 1992, the proposal was made by the Secretariat and after considering this proposal the General Conference requested the Director General to prepare a report on a possible programme of activities on education and training in radiological protection and nuclear safety in its resolution RES1584. In response to this request and as a first step, the Secretariat prepared a Standard Syllabus for the Post- graduate Educational Course in Radiation Protection. Subsequently, planning of specialised training courses and workshops in different areas of Standard Syllabus were also made. A similar approach was taken to develop basic professional training in nuclear safety. In January 1997, Programme Performance Assessment System (PPAS) recommended the preparation of a standard syllabus for nuclear safety based on Agency Safely Standard Series Documents and any other internationally accepted practices. A draft Standard Syllabus for Basic Professional Training Course in Nuclear Safety (BPTC) was prepared by a group of consultants in November 1997 and the syllabus was finalised in July 1998 in the second consultants meeting. The Basic Professional Training Course on Nuclear Safety was offered for the first time at the end of 1999, in English, in Saclay, France, in cooperation with Institut National des Sciences et Techniques Nucleaires/Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique (INSTN/CEA).
    [Show full text]
  • European Consortium for the Development of Fusion Energy European Consortium for the Development of Fusion Energy CONTENTS CONTENTS
    EuropEan Consortium for thE DEvElopmEnt of fusion EnErgy EuropEan Consortium for thE DEvElopmEnt of fusion EnErgy Contents Contents introDuCtion ReseaRCH units CooRDinating national ReseaRCH FoR euRofusion 16 agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie, l’energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile (enea), italy euRofusion: eMboDying tHe sPiRit oF euRoPean CollaboRation 17 FinnFusion, finland 4 the essence of fusion 18 fusion@Öaw, austria the tantalising challenge of realising fusion power 19 hellenic fusion research unit (Hellenic Ru), greece the history of European fusion collaboration 20 institute for plasmas and nuclear fusion (iPFn), portugal 5 Eurofusion is born 21 institute of solid state physics (issP), latvia the road from itEr to DEmo 22 Karlsruhe institute of technology (Kit), germany 6 Eurofusion facts at a glance 23 lithuanian Energy institute (lei), lithuania 7 itEr facts at a glance 24 plasma physics and fusion Energy, Department of physics, technical university of Denmark (Dtu), Denmark JEt facts at a glance 25 plasma physics Department, wigner Fusion, hungary 8 infographic: Eurofusion devices and research units 26 plasma physics laboratory, Ecole royale militaire (lPP-eRM/KMs), Belgium 27 ruder Boškovi´c institute, Croatian fusion research unit (CRu), Croatia 28 slovenian fusion association (sFa), slovenia 29 spanish national fusion laboratory (lnF), CiEmat, spain 30 swedish research Council (vR), sweden rEsEarCh unit profilEs 31 sylwester Kaliski institute of plasma physics and laser microfusion (iPPlM), poland 32 the institute
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
    DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND nuclear power today, and more than 40 others have recently ENGINEERING expressed an interest in developing new nuclear energy programs. Nuclear power is the only low-carbon energy source that is both inherently scalable and already generating a signicant share of the The Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering (NSE) provides world's electricity supplies. Fission technology is entering a new era undergraduate and graduate education for students interested in in which upgraded existing plants, next-generation reactors, and developing new nuclear technologies for the benet of society and new fuel cycle technologies and strategies will contribute to meeting the environment. the rapidly growing global demand for safe and cost-competitive low- carbon electricity supplies. This is an exciting time to study nuclear science and engineering. There is an upsurge of innovative activity in the eld, including a Fission energy research in the Nuclear Science and Engineering drastic increase in nuclear start-up companies, as energy resource department is focused on developing advanced nuclear reactor constraints, security concerns, and the risks of climate change are designs for electricity, process heat, and fluid fuels production creating new demands for safe, secure, cost-competitive nuclear that include passive safety features; developing innovative energy systems. At the same time, powerful new tools for exploring, proliferation-resistant fuel cycles; extending the life of nuclear measuring, modeling, and controlling complex nuclear and radiation fuels and structures; and reducing the capital and operating costs processes are laying the foundations for major advances in the of nuclear energy systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Effects of Pu-240, Pu-241, and Pu-242 on the Pu-239 Critical Mass of a Fast Reactor Frank Peter Mertes Jr
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1962 Some effects of Pu-240, Pu-241, and Pu-242 on the Pu-239 critical mass of a fast reactor Frank Peter Mertes Jr. Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Nuclear Commons, and the Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons Recommended Citation Mertes, Frank Peter Jr., "Some effects of Pu-240, Pu-241, and Pu-242 on the Pu-239 critical mass of a fast reactor " (1962). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 2313. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/2313 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 63—2991 microfilmed exactly as received MERTES, Jr., Frank Peter. 1935— SOME EFFECTS OF PU-240, PU-241, AND PU-242 ON THE PU-239 CRITICAL MASS OF A FAST REACTOR. Iowa State University of Science and Technology Ph.D., 1962 Physics, nuclear University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan SOME EFFECTS OF PU-2ltO, PU-2liL, AND PU-2lj2 ON THE PU-239 CRITICAL ÎS.SS OF A FAST REA.CTGR Frank Peter Martes, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Nuclear Engineering Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Rom - M.It
    MITNE-I 88 NUCLEAR 'GINEERING READING ROM - M.IT. INNUCLEAR ENGINEERING AT RACT 1976 ACT IVITIES IN NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AT MIT Prepared by the Staff of the Nuclear Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction -------------------------------------- 1 2. Summary of Developments Since February 1975 ------- 5 3. Research and Educational Activities ---------------- 14 3.1 Reactor Physics -------------------------------- 14 3.1.1 Subjects of Instruction ---------------- 14 3.1.2 Reactor Theory --------------------------16 3.1.3 Fast Reactor Physics Analysis --------- 19 3.1.4 Thermal Reactor Physics ---------------- 21 3.1.5 Reactor Kinetics ------------------------22 3.1.6 Reactor Physics Constants for Safety Analysis ------------------------------ 24 3.1.7 Reactor Safety Codes ------------------- 25 3.1.8 Rod-Drop Accident Analysis ------------ 26 3.2 Reactor Engineering ---------------------------- 27 3.2.1 Subjects of Instruction ---------------- 27 3.2.2 Reactor Thermal Analysis --------------- 31 3.2.3 Nuclear Power Reactor Safety ---------- 41 3.2.4 Nuclear Reactor and Energy System Design ---------------------------------- 49 3.2.5 Fuel Designs for Plutonium Recycle ---- 51 3.3 Nuclear Materials and Radiation Effects ------ 52 3.3.1 Subjects of Instruction --------------- 52 3.3.2 Irradiation-Induced Stress Relaxation and Creep in Reactor Materials -------- 54 3.3.3 Strength Differential Effects in Zirconium Alloys ------------------------55 3.3.4 Fuel Performance
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Research Centres in the 21St Century
    IAEA-NRC-21ST Nuclear Research Centres in the 21st Century Final report of a meeting held in Vienna, 13-15 December 1999 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY 33/05 November 2001 — 21VT Nuclear Research Centres in the 21st Century Final report of a meeting held in Vienna, 13-15 December 1999 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY ^ November 2001 The originator of this publication in the IAEA was: Division of Physical and Chemical Sciences International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria NUCLEAR RESEARCH CENTRES IN THE 21st CENTURY IAEA, VIENNA, 2001 IAEA-NRC-21ST © IAEA, 2001 Printed by the IAEA in Austria November 2001 FOREWORD During the last fifty years, a large number of countries have established nuclear research centres (NRCs) with the mission of (1) developing indigenous expertise in nuclear science and technology, (2) training scientists/engineers for research and development on nuclear power reactors and applications of radioisotopes and radiation, and (3) facilitating commercial exploitation of nuclear technology. Many research centres have developed nuclear expertise on all aspects of nuclear science and technology through setting up and operating large nuclear facilities like research reactors, accelerators, fuel cycle facilities and the like. NRCs have been the cradle for a host of industries dealing with peaceful uses of nuclear energy. By virtue of their multidisciplinary nature, nuclear research centres have also been strategic elements of technology development in many countries and a number of industries have benefited by association with NRCs. For technologies which have already been deployed, there is a belief that less R&D from NRCs is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Techniques Syllabus
    PhD COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION NUCLEAR TECHNIQUES SYLLABUS FUSION PLASMA PHYSICS 1. Concepts of fusion power generation Nuclear physics basics for fusion power: reactions, cross sections, fuel cycle, concept of thermonuclear fusion. Comparison of the concepts of peaceful thermonuclear power (inertial and magnetic confinement). Main types of plasma diagnostics, related physical phenomena: plasma waves, plasma radiation, rate equations. Prominent fusion devices. 2. Magnetic confinement fusion technology Magnetic confinement, motion of charged particles in a magnetic field. Geometry of the magnetic field in the various designs: linear device, stellarator, tokamak, RFP. Installation and main components of fusion devices. Plasma production, refueling, heating, plasma-wall relationship, current drive, course of an experiment. Particle and heat transport in fusion plasmas. Instabilities important from the perspective of operation. 3. Theoretical fusion plasma physics Definition and primary physical properties of a plasma. Formulation, properties and limit of applicability of the kinetic theory, the multi-fluid plasma model and magnetohydrodynamics; examples through applications. MHD equilibrium, MHD stability, prominent plasma waves and their applications in magnetic confinement fusion devices. MEDICAL PHYSICS 4. Teletherapy – photon and electron therapy Principles of operation, design and characteristic parameters of radiotherapy treatment machines. Photon and electron beam calibration, dosimetry of small radiation fields. Devices and methods of metrology used in radiotherapy. Radiation design, the role of imaging, assessment of radiation treatment plans, plan quality indices, patient dosimetry. Equipment of image-guided radiotherapy, correction methods. Radiation protection of teletherapy treatment machines. Radiobiological characteristics of acute and late side effects induced by radiation, LQ model. Prevention of radiation accidents, quality assurance measurements and risk assessment. 5.
    [Show full text]