DOCSLIB.ORG

UCC Library and UCC Researchers Have Made This Item Openly Available

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UCC Library and UCC Researchers Have Made This Item Openly Available UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks! Title Not thinking straight? A critical discourse analysis of the 2006 Irish High Court ruling in Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Attorney General Author(s) Mullins, Jackie (Gertrude Jacqueline) Publication date 2013 Original citation Mullins, J. 2013. Not thinking straight? A critical discourse analysis of the 2006 Irish High Court ruling in Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Attorney General. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Link to publisher's http://library.ucc.ie/record=b2073900 version Access to the full text of the published version may require a subscription. Rights © 2013, Jackie Mullins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/1128 from Downloaded on 2021-10-05T06:48:22Z TITLE PAGE Thesis Title: Not Thinking Straight? A Critical Discourse Analysis of the 2006 Irish High Court Ruling in Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Attorney General Author: Jackie Mullins (Gertrude Jacqueline Mullins) Thesis submitted for PhD Thesis submitted to National University of Ireland, Cork Research conducted under School of Applied Social Studies, UCC Date of Submission: May 2013 Head of School: Professor Fred Powell Supervisors: Dr. Máire Leane and Dr. Jacqui O’Riordan 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................. 2 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 10 What’s the Story? Interrogating the Constitutional and Legislative Position on Same-Sex Marriage in Ireland ............................................ 10 Background to the High Court Ruling .................................................... 12 Research Questions and Rationale .......................................................... 14 Relationship and Family Recognition: Irish and International Developments .......................................................................................... 16 Introduction to Trajectory ................................................................... 16 Aspects to the American Trajectory ................................................... 18 Aspects to the Wider European Trajectory ......................................... 20 Aspects to the Irish Trajectory ............................................................ 21 International Perspectives on Relationship Recognition .................... 23 Further Aspects to the Irish Trajectory ............................................... 24 Further Aspects to the American Trajectory ....................................... 26 Further Aspects to the Irish Trajectory ............................................... 27 Further Aspects to the Wider European Trajectory ............................ 34 Further Aspects to the American Trajectory ....................................... 36 Current Aspects to the Irish Trajectory ............................................... 37 Conclusion to Trajectory ..................................................................... 39 Chapter Outline ....................................................................................... 40 Introduction: What’s the Story? Interrogating the Constitutional and Legislative Position on Same-Sex Marriage in Ireland ...................... 40 Chapter One: Text Messages and Baggage Claim: Method and Methodology ........................................................................................ 40 Chapter Two: In Theory: Theoretical and Conceptual Considerations ............................................................................................................. 41 Chapter Three: Nuclear Options: Conceptualisations of Marriage ... 42 Chapter Four: Irish Ways and Irish Laws: Aspects to Marriage, Family and Sexuality ........................................................................... 43 Chapter Five: The Love That Dare Now Speak Her Name: Critical Discourse Analysis of the High Court Ruling in Zappone and Gilligan ............................................................................................................. 44 Chapter Six: Pen Pals, Parish-Pumps, and Putting on an Act: ‘Letters to the Editor’, E-Mails from Politicians, and Oireachtas Debates Pertaining to Civil Partnership........................................................... 45 Conclusion: The Last Word: Concluding Thoughts ........................... 46 CHAPTER ONE ......................................................................................... 48 Text Messages and Baggage Claim: Method and Methodology ............ 48 Introduction ............................................................................................. 48 Language, Social Cognition, Discourse, Critical Discourse Analysis.... 49 The Linguistic Turn ............................................................................ 49 Social Cognition .................................................................................. 52 2 Discourse ............................................................................................. 53 Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) .................................................... 55 CDA: Important Considerations ............................................................. 57 Discourse Access Profile of Elites: The Judiciary .............................. 58 Discourse Access Profile of Elites: Expert Witnesses ........................ 59 Discourse Access Profile of Elites: Politicians / Legislators .............. 60 Access to Discourse: Non-Elites / ‘Ordinary’ People ........................ 61 Letters to the Editor ............................................................................. 63 Legitimation ........................................................................................ 64 Negative Representation of the ‘Other’ .............................................. 65 Framing ............................................................................................... 67 Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) .............................................. 69 Other CDA Considerations ................................................................. 70 Further Methodological Considerations ................................................. 71 Reflexivity ........................................................................................... 71 Marriage Equality................................................................................ 72 Marriage and Family as Institution ..................................................... 73 Heteronormativity ............................................................................... 73 Heterosexism ....................................................................................... 74 My Politics .......................................................................................... 75 Intellectual Baggage ............................................................................ 76 The Importance of Our Constitution ................................................... 76 My Evolving Perspective on Relationship Recognition ..................... 78 Conclusion ............................................................................................... 80 CHAPTER TWO ........................................................................................ 83 In Theory: Theoretical and Conceptual Considerations ........................ 83 Introduction ............................................................................................. 83 Theorisation of Equality / Inequality ...................................................... 84 Theorisation of Difference ...................................................................... 87 Biological Difference .......................................................................... 87 Difference as Disadvantage ................................................................ 89 Difference as Social Relation .............................................................. 89 Difference To ...................................................................................... 91 Difference as Deficit / Defect / Deviance ........................................... 92 Difference as Deployment .................................................................. 94 Equality of Respect and Recognition ...................................................... 96 A Way Forward ....................................................................................... 99 Conclusion ............................................................................................. 100 CHAPTER THREE ................................................................................... 102 Nuclear Options: Conceptualisations of Marriage .............................. 102 Introduction ........................................................................................... 102 Historical Construction of Marriage ..................................................... 104 Order and Stability ................................................................................ 108 Procreation ............................................................................................ 108 Additional Marriage Laws .................................................................... 110 3 The Criminalisation of Homosexuality ................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2013 Irish Legislation on Abortion: Turning-Point Or Missed Opportunity?
    NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND GALWAY European Master’s Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation A.Y. 2013/2014 The 2013 Irish legislation on abortion: turning-point or missed opportunity? A critical analysis from a human rights perspective Author: Chiara Cosentino Supervisor: Noelle Higgins Ackowledgements I would like to thank Noelle Higgins, from the NUI of Galway, for the supervision of the present work and for her precise and insightful comments and suggestions. Furthermore, I would like to deeply thank the contacted civil society organisations that kindly and enthusiastically agreed on allowing me to steal a bit of their time for interviews. They were fundamental for my analysis, for the perception from the ground they gave me, and for the global picture that I could capture from their different angles of perspective on the topic. In particular I would love to thank for their availability Richie Keane (Coordinator of Doctors For Choice), Sinéad Corcoran (member of the Policy and Advocacy Team of Abortion Right Campaign), Kelly Mackey (from the Campaign Office of Amnesty International Ireland), Maeve Taylor (Senior Policy and Advocacy Officer of the Irish Family Planning Association) and Dette McLoughlin, John Walshe and Joseph Loughnane (members of Galway Pro-Choice). I would also like to thank my family, my parents, my sister and my grandmother for their unconditional support, and for making my participation in this Master possible, both with their practical help and love. I missed them throughout this year, but we all know that, wherever I am, they are always in my heart. Moreover, I would like to thank all my friends, old and new, for what they mean and they will always mean to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    DÁIL ÉIREANN AN COMHCHOISTE UM AN OCHTÚ LEASÚ AR AN MBUNREACHT JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITU- TION Dé Céadaoin, 25 Deireadh Fómhair 2017 Wednesday, 25 October 2017 The Joint Committee met at 1.30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Deputy James Browne, Senator Paul Gavan, Deputy Lisa Chambers, Senator Rónán Mullen, Deputy Ruth Coppinger, Senator Lynn Ruane. Deputy Clare Daly, Deputy Bernard J. Durkan, Deputy Peter Fitzpatrick, Deputy Billy Kelleher, Deputy Mattie McGrath, Deputy Catherine Murphy, Deputy Hildegarde Naughton, Deputy Jonathan O’Brien, Deputy Kate O’Connell, Deputy Louise O’Reilly, Deputy Jan O’Sullivan, Deputy Anne Rabbitte, SENATOR CATHERINE NOONE IN THE CHAIR. 1 JEAC The joint committee met in private session until 2.15 p.m. Business of Joint Committee Chairman: We are now in public session. I welcome members. I welcome viewers who may be watching our proceedings on Oireachtas television to this meeting in public session of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution. We will be holding three separate sessions this afternoon. The first session will address risk to mental health; the second will address termination arising from rape and the third will look at personal experience of cases of fatal foetal abnormality. We had invited the support group One More Day to that third session, however, they could not make today’s session and the secretariat will accommodate them on a date in November. I welcome Professor Veronica O’Keane to the meeting, but before I introduce her I must attend to some housekeeping matters. There are two items of correspondence that I need to read into the record.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Studies Around the World – 2020
    Estudios Irlandeses, Issue 16, 2021, pp. 238-283 https://doi.org/10.24162/EI2021-10080 _________________________________________________________________________AEDEI IRISH STUDIES AROUND THE WORLD – 2020 Maureen O’Connor (ed.) Copyright (c) 2021 by the authors. This text may be archived and redistributed both in electronic form and in hard copy, provided that the author and journal are properly cited and no fee is charged for access. Introduction Maureen O’Connor ............................................................................................................... 240 Cultural Memory in Seamus Heaney’s Late Work Joanne Piavanini Charles Armstrong ................................................................................................................ 243 Fine Meshwork: Philip Roth, Edna O’Brien, and Jewish-Irish Literature Dan O’Brien George Bornstein .................................................................................................................. 247 Irish Women Writers at the Turn of the 20th Century: Alternative Histories, New Narratives Edited by Kathryn Laing and Sinéad Mooney Deirdre F. Brady ..................................................................................................................... 250 English Language Poets in University College Cork, 1970-1980 Clíona Ní Ríordáin Lucy Collins ........................................................................................................................ 253 The Theater and Films of Conor McPherson: Conspicuous Communities Eamon
    [Show full text]
  • A Reproductive Right, Or a Moral Profligacy?
    A REPRODUCTIVE RIGHT, OR A MORAL PROFLIGACY? A POLICY PAPER DISCUSSING THE LEGISLATIVE FUTURE FOR MALTA An Għaqda Studenti Tal-Liġi Policy Paper © Għaqda Studenti tal-Liġi 2020 OPENING REMARKS INTRODUCTION It is with great pleasure that I present A multidisciplinary modus operandi was to you this year’s GħSL policy paper employed to offer a holistic discussion addressing the subject of Abortion, a and this was achieved through a paper which is the culmination of the thorough examination of pertinent comprehensive work of the GħSL Policy areas beyond the legal sphere such as Office. medical research, ethical considerations involved, as well as the psychological GħSL strives to keep law students as aspects, among others. well as society as a whole abreast regarding current legal issues in Malta. Moreover, a comparative exercise was An ongoing area of contention featuring carried out, whereby the laws regulating, across local media centres around the restricting and prohibiting abortion were topic of abortion. Due to the polarised evaluated. This contributed towards a views on this subject, the GħSL comprehensive outcome of this policy Executive Board decided that it would paper and provided a robust reference be opportune to delve into this topic. point for active and potential students alike. As a body representing the interests of law students, throughout this paper our Finally, I would like to thank the main focus was to maintain and uphold colleagues of GħSL, including all those an impartial appreciation of the law who contributed to this paper, namely while taking into account the sensitive Dr Desiree Attard, Andrew Sciberras, nature of this topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage Equality and the Catholic Church in Ireland Helen Meaney
    Master Thesis In the Name of the Father, and of the Son: Marriage Equality and the Catholic Church in Ireland Helen Meaney Supervisor: Christina Bergqvist Year: Autumn 2016 Words: 13 869 Points: 15 Abstract This thesis will use the final Marriage Equality Referendum debate which took place on the Irish national broadcaster RTÉ in May 2015 and analyse the No campaign’s willingness to be associated with the Catholic Church through discourse and framing analysis. This qualitative study aspires to ascertain the salience of the Catholic Church to the Irish electorate in areas of moral-social policy in Ireland. It will be found that substantial Catholic identification and high levels of religiosity does not necessitate influence of the Church over the electorate. Table of Contents List of Acronyms.................................................................................................... 1 Irish Titles ............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2 Aims and Research Question ............................................................................... 3 Disposition ........................................................................................................... 5 Literature Review .................................................................................................. 6 Theory ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Reproductive Right, Or a Moral Profligacy? a Policy Paper Discussing the Legislative Future for Malta
    A REPRODUCTIVE RIGHT, OR A MORAL PROFLIGACY? A POLICY PAPER DISCUSSING THE LEGISLATIVE FUTURE FOR MALTA An Għaqda Studenti Tal-Liġi Policy Paper © Għaqda Studenti tal-Liġi 2020 OPENING REMARKS INTRODUCTION It is with great pleasure that I present A multidisciplinary modus operandi was to you this year’s GħSL policy paper employed to offer a holistic discussion addressing the subject of Abortion, a and this was achieved through a paper which is the culmination of the thorough examination of pertinent comprehensive work of the GħSL Policy areas beyond the legal sphere such as Office. medical research, ethical considerations involved, as well as the psychological GħSL strives to keep law students as aspects, among others. well as society as a whole abreast regarding current legal issues in Malta. Moreover, a comparative exercise was An ongoing area of contention featuring carried out, whereby the laws regulating, across local media centres around the restricting and prohibiting abortion were topic of abortion. Due to the polarised evaluated. This contributed towards a views on this subject, the GħSL comprehensive outcome of this policy Executive Board decided that it would paper and provided a robust reference be opportune to delve into this topic. point for active and potential students alike. As a body representing the interests of law students, throughout this paper our Finally, I would like to thank the main focus was to maintain and uphold colleagues of GħSL, including all those an impartial appreciation of the law who contributed to this paper, namely while taking into account the sensitive Dr Desiree Attard, Andrew Sciberras, nature of this topic.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF(All Devices)
    Published by: The Irish Times Limited (Irish Times Books) © The Irish Times 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of The Irish Times Limited, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographic rights organisation or as expressly permitted by law. Acknowledgements A large thank you to all the authors who have contributed to this eBook: Una Mullally, Ursula Halligan, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin, Benedict O Floinn, Stephen McIntyre, Patricia McKenna, Maire Geoghegan Quinn, Heather Barwick, Finn Murray, Noel Whelan, Colm Toibin, Vincent Twomey, Rosaleen, McDonagh, Kathy Sheridan, William Binchy, Diarmaid Ferriter, Breda O’Brien, Fintan O’Toole, Patrick Comerford, Colm O’Gorman, Paddy Monaghan, Derek J. Byrne, Jane Suiter, James Kelly, Juan Carlos Cordovez-Mantilla, David Hoctor, John Holden, Quentin Fottrell, Jensen Byrne, Aoife Byrne, Ronan Mullen, Ivana Bacik, Prof Ray Kinsella, Denis Staunton, Fiach Kelly, Kathy Sheridan, Stephen Collins, Marie O’Halloran, Ruadhan Mac Cormaic, Miriam Lord, Patsy McGarry and David Norris Foreword Ireland's referendum to legalise same-sex marriage was the first of its kind in the world and the campaign to change the Constitution was unlike any the country had seen before. Just over two decades after homosexuality was decriminalised in Ireland, all the political parties represented in parliament and much of civil society came together to back marriage equality. But the campaign was led by a small group of gay and lesbian activists and the most powerful arguments for change came in the form of personal testimonies of individual gay men and lesbians.
    [Show full text]
  • 20200214 Paul Loughlin Volume Two 2000 Hrs.Pdf
    DEBATING CONTRACEPTION, ABORTION AND DIVORCE IN AN ERA OF CONTROVERSY AND CHANGE: NEW AGENDAS AND RTÉ RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMMES 1968‐2018 VOLUME TWO: APPENDICES Paul Loughlin, M. Phil. (Dub) A thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Professor Eunan O’Halpin Contents Appendix One: Methodology. Construction of Base Catalogue ........................................ 3 Catalogue ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. BASE PROGRAMME CATALOGUE CONSTRUCTION USING MEDIAWEB ...................................... 148 1.2. EXTRACT - MASTER LIST 3 LAST REVIEWED 22/11/2018. 17:15H ...................................... 149 1.3. EXAMPLES OF MEDIAWEB ENTRIES .................................................................................. 150 1.4. CONSTRUCTION OF A TIMELINE ........................................................................................ 155 1.5. RTÉ TRANSITION TO DIGITISATION ................................................................................... 157 1.6. DETAILS OF METHODOLOGY AS IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS THESIS PRE-DIGITISATION ............. 159 1.7. CITATION ..................................................................................................................... 159 Appendix Two: ‘Abortion Stories’ from the RTÉ DriveTime Series ................................ 166 2.1. ANNA’S STORY .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Article 40.3.3° and the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Limerick Institutional Repository 2013 Article 40.3.3 and the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013 1 Article 40.3.3 and the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013: The Impetus for, and Process of, Legislative Change Dr. Catherine O’Sullivan, Jennifer Schweppe and Dr. Eimear Spain This article serves as an introduction to this special edition of the I.J.L.S. on the recent developments on abortion law in Ireland. It briefly explains what were the two main drivers behind the introduction of the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013, namely the European Court of Human Right’s judgment against Ireland in the case of A., B. & C. v. Ireland, no. 25579/05 [2010] E.C.H.R. 2032 (16 December 2010) and the untimely death of Savita Halappanavar. It then reviews a series of public hearings, heard by the Joint Committee on Health and Children in January and May 2013, on how to best meet Ireland’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and under the Constitution. Finally it details the genesis of this special edition and introduces the work of the contributors. I – Introduction This special edition of the I.J.L.S. has arisen out of recent developments in the area of abortion law in Ireland. In brief, the passage of the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013 (2013 Bill) through both Houses of the Oireachtas has been prompted by two main drivers. The first was the finding of the European Court of Human Rights (E.Ct.H.R.) in the December 2010 judgment of A., B.
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad Éireann
    Vol. 252 Tuesday, No. 6 20 June 2017 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SEANAD ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insert Date Here 20/06/2017A00100Business of Seanad 385 20/06/2017B00150Commencement Matters 386 20/06/2017B00175Schools Building Projects �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������386 20/06/2017E00200Home Care Packages Provision 390 20/06/2017G00400Motorised Transport Grant Closure 392 20/06/2017J00400Child Care Services Provision ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������394 20/06/2017N00100Appointment of Taoiseach, Members of Government, Minister of State and Attorney General 396 20/06/2017N00300Order of Business 399 20/06/2017EE00100Report of Committee on Procedure and Privileges on Standing Order 70A: Motion ������������������������������������������420 20/06/2017EE00400Special Joint Committee on the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution: Motion 420 20/06/2017GG00400Inland Fisheries (Amendment) Bill 2017: Second Stage 424 20/06/2017LL00100Offences against the
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Submitted by Nigel Connor Ba
    A POST GAY IRELAND? EXPLORING THE LEGACY OF THE ‘YES EQUALITY’ CAMPAIGN FOR LGBT+ SOCIAL MOVEMENT LEADERS AND CONSTITUENT MEMBERS. A THESIS SUBMITTED BY NIGEL CONNOR B.A. (P.S.P), M.A FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LITERATURE SOCIOLOGY DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE MAYNOOTH UNIVERSITY, IRELAND DATE OF SUBMISSION OCTOBER 2017 HEAD OF DEPARTMENT: PROF. MARY P. CORCORAN RESEARCH SUPERVISOR: DR. PAULINE CULLEN CONTENTS Abstract 4 Acknowledgments 5 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Research Aims 7 1.2 Exploring social movement success through a Plurality of Voices 8 1.3 Acceptance and LGBT+ People In Ireland 9 1.4 Community, Movement and Identity 10 1.5 Rurality 12 1.6 Key Findings 13 1.7 Contribution 14 2. Methodology 16 2.1 PURPOSE AND VALUES 16 2.2 GOALS AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 16 2.3 PARADIGM AND CRITICAL APPROACHES 17 2.5 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS 20 2.6 SAMPLING: IDENTIFYING KEY ACTORS AND PARTICIPANT GROUPS 21 2.7 METHODOLOGY OF DATA COLLECTION 22 2.7.1 FOCUS GROUPS 22 2.8 PROFILES OF FOCUS GROUP PARTICIPANTS 23 2.8.1 EQUALITY MAYO 24 2.8.2 LONGFORD LGBT 25 2.8.3 DUBLIN FOCUS GROUP 26 2.9 ELITE INTERVIEWS 31 2.9.1 IRISH LGBT+ MOVEMENT ORGANISATIONS 33 2.10 Participant observation 36 2.11 CODING 38 2.12 LIMITATIONS 38 2.12.1 ETHICALLY CONSIDERATIONS TOWARDS PARTICIPANTS 39 3. The Development of the Yes Equality Campaign. 40 3.1 The KAL Case 40 3.2 Agitation for Marriage Rights Begins 41 3.3 The Formation of Marriage Equality and LGBT Noise 42 3.4 Tension caused by Civil Partnership and Civil Marriage 43 3.5 The Introduction of Civil Partnership 45 3.6 The Groundwork for Civil Marriage is Laid 46 1 3.7 The Irish Counter Movement to LGBT+ rights 48 3.8 Yes Equality: Beginnings 49 3.9 Mothers and Fathers Matter 50 3.10 Pantigate 50 3.11 Yes Equality: Messaging and Groundwork 51 3.12 Yes Equality: The Referendum Campaign 53 3.13 Contemporary Issues for Irish LGBT+ people 54 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad Éireann
    Vol. 242 Tuesday, No. 11 20 October 2015 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SeaNad ÉireaNN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insert Date Here 20/10/2015A00100Business of Seanad 529 20/10/2015B00100Commencement Matters 530 20/10/2015B00200Greenways Funding 530 20/10/2015D00500Pensions Levy 532 20/10/2015F00200Hospital Services 535 20/10/2015J00250Housing Provision 538 20/10/2015O00100Order of Business 541 /2015FF00100Proceeds of Sale of Aer Lingus: Motion 559 20/10/2015FF01600Marriage Bill 2015: Second Stage 559 SeaNad ÉireaNN Dé Máirt, 20 Deireadh Fómhair 2015 Tuesday, 20 October 2015 Chuaigh an Cathaoirleach i gceannas ar 230 pm Machnamh agus Paidir. Reflection and Prayer. 20/10/2015a00100Business of Seanad 20/10/2015A00200an Leas-Chathaoirleach: I have received notice from Senator Paschal Mooney that, on the motion for the Commencement of the House today, he proposes to raise the following matter: The need for the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport to outline his Department’s
    [Show full text]