The Meaning of Civil Partnership for Same

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Meaning of Civil Partnership for Same The Meaning of Civil Partnership for Same- Sex Couples in Ireland: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Presented to Dublin City University By Gráinne (Gertrude C.) Healy Bachelor of Arts, Higher Diploma in Education Post Graduate Diploma in Journalism Supervisors: Dr Mel Duffy, Dublin City University Mr Jean-Philippe Imbert, Dublin City University Dublin City University School of Applied Language and Intercultural Studies August 2015 Declaration I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy is entirely my own work, that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ID No. 89908589 Date: Acknowledgements My sincere gratitude goes to Dr Mel Duffy and Mr Jean-Philippe Imbert for their unstinting support over the four years of study at DCU. They provided me with guidance and a listening ear while encouraging rigour and academic discipline. Thank you to the School of Applied Language and Intercultural Studies for providing much needed financial assistance in year one and two and to the Government of Ireland fund for their scholarship in year three which enabled me to finish the thesis. As this is essentially a study about love, I wish to acknowledge my beloved partner Patricia O’Connor, without whom I could never have sustained the level of attention needed to complete this work. From start to finish and over the decades we have been together, conversations with Patricia have brought me on many of the discursive journeys contained in this work. Her insights, her understanding, her love and her patience during my PhD absence are all acknowledged here. To Conor Irwin and Ciara Travers for their support and for allowing me spend time with their wonderful son, Harry during his first two years. He was often my beautiful distraction and times spent walking in parks with him were an oasis of peace in stressful times. To friends who supported me on the journey, Ursula Barry, Monica O’Connor, Ailbhe Smyth, Ann Louise Gilligan, Felicity Kennedy, Mary McPhail, Melissa Murray, Caroline Butler, Noreen Byrne, Des McGuinness, Fiona Casey, Denise Charlton, Paula Fagan, Linda Cullen, Feargha Ní Bhroin, Ruth O’Rourke, and my dear departed friend and mentor Tom Kearns. Each of you helped me follow Seamus Heaney’s advice that in order to write, one needs to start, write and start again. To the twelve couples who shared with me their experiences of relationship recognition, thank you. Each of you welcomed me to your home and opened your heart to me. I hope I have done some justice to the worlds you shared as you transformed my understanding. Thanks you to my sisters and brothers for their encouragement and to my nephew Jonathan who understood the PhD process so well. To my mother Maureen Healy who always knew formal education was a precious gift and who made sacrifices for her seven children so that we could experience what she never had. Much missed since her death, but very present throughout this journey. To the staff and board of Marriage Equality who over a decade gave me a space in which to actively pursue the dream of marriage equality, thank you. Finally, to the Yes Equality campaign, thank you for making the dream a reality in Referendum 2015 with a 62.7% Yes vote – a national transformation achieved. This thesis is a small part of that. Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction and Overview ................................................................................. 2 1. 1. The Research Journey: an Introduction ........................................................................... 2 1.2. Aim, Purpose and Research Question ................................................................................ 3 1.3. Overview of Study .............................................................................................................. 3 1.4. Choice of Topic and Proposed Contribution ...................................................................... 4 1.5. Context: Relationship Recognition - The Heteronormative Model: Marriage .................. 5 Chapter 2. Socio-Historic Review of Same-Sex Relationships and Emergence of Same-Same Relationship Recognition ................................................................................................... 17 2.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 17 2.2. Same-Sex Love and Same-Sex Relationships: a Socio-Historical Review ......................... 17 2.2.1. Roots of Officially Sanctioned Prejudice against Same-Sex Sexuality....................... 18 2.2.2. Same-Sex Relations as Transgression ....................................................................... 20 2.2.3. Changing Views of Sexuality ..................................................................................... 21 2.2.4. Beginnings of Revolts and Organised Resistance...................................................... 23 2.2.5. Emergence of Relational Rights in the Gay Liberation Movement ...................... 24 2.3. Same-Sex Sexualities and Emergence of ‘Families of Choice’ ......................................... 25 2.4. Displacement of Lesbians and Gays from Family and Marriage ...................................... 28 2.5. Sexual Identities are Troubling ........................................................................................ 29 2.6. Changing Patterns: Current Provision of Same-Sex Relationship Recognition ................ 30 2.7. Same-Sex Relationship Recognition Research Themes ................................................... 32 2.7.1. Positive Impacts of Relationship Recognition ........................................................... 32 2.7.2. Concerns Arising from the Introduction of Same-Sex Relationship Regulation ....... 33 2.7.3. Impact on Community and Public Policy .................................................................. 34 2.7.4. Same-Sex Parenting and Family Issues ..................................................................... 35 2.7.5. Parenting Rights Gaps, Heteronormativity and the Legacy of Same-Sex Family Studies ................................................................................................................................. 36 2.7.6. Same-Sex Relationship Recognition: Future Challenges for Same-Sex Couples ....... 39 2.8. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 39 Chapter 3. Same-Sex Relationship Recognition in Ireland ................................................... 41 3.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 41 3.2. Emergence of Same-Sex Headed Households ................................................................. 41 3.3. Family, Marriage, Same-Sex Relationship Recognition and the Irish Constitution ......... 44 3.4. Gay and Lesbian Rights Progress ..................................................................................... 48 3.5. Same-Sex Relationship Recognition: Growing Support ................................................... 51 3.6. Emergence of Civil Partnership ........................................................................................ 53 3.7. Legal Discourse Backdrop to Same-Sex Relationship Recognition in Ireland .................. 57 3.8. Irish Same-Sex Relationship Recognition Legal Challenge: The KAL Case ....................... 60 3.9. Key Provisions of the Civil Partnership and Certain Cohabitants Act (2010) ................... 64 3.9.1. Key Differences between Civil Partnership and Civil Marriage ................................ 65 3.10. Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 71 Chapter 4. Methodology and Research Methods ................................................................ 73 4.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 73 4.2. Section One: The Principles of the Theoretical Framework Underpinning Hermeneutic Phenomenological Research ................................................................................................... 73 4.2.1. Qualitative Vs Quantitative Methodology ................................................................ 73 4.2.2. Rationale for Not Opting For Other Qualitative Research Traditions ....................... 75 4.2.2.i Focus ........................................................................................................................ 75 4.2.2.ii. Discipline Origin ..................................................................................................... 76 4.2.2.iii. Narrative Form ...................................................................................................... 76 4.2.2.iv. Data Collection ...................................................................................................... 76 4.2.2.v. Data Analysis .........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Irish Studies Around the World – 2020
    Estudios Irlandeses, Issue 16, 2021, pp. 238-283 https://doi.org/10.24162/EI2021-10080 _________________________________________________________________________AEDEI IRISH STUDIES AROUND THE WORLD – 2020 Maureen O’Connor (ed.) Copyright (c) 2021 by the authors. This text may be archived and redistributed both in electronic form and in hard copy, provided that the author and journal are properly cited and no fee is charged for access. Introduction Maureen O’Connor ............................................................................................................... 240 Cultural Memory in Seamus Heaney’s Late Work Joanne Piavanini Charles Armstrong ................................................................................................................ 243 Fine Meshwork: Philip Roth, Edna O’Brien, and Jewish-Irish Literature Dan O’Brien George Bornstein .................................................................................................................. 247 Irish Women Writers at the Turn of the 20th Century: Alternative Histories, New Narratives Edited by Kathryn Laing and Sinéad Mooney Deirdre F. Brady ..................................................................................................................... 250 English Language Poets in University College Cork, 1970-1980 Clíona Ní Ríordáin Lucy Collins ........................................................................................................................ 253 The Theater and Films of Conor McPherson: Conspicuous Communities Eamon
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage Equality and the Catholic Church in Ireland Helen Meaney
    Master Thesis In the Name of the Father, and of the Son: Marriage Equality and the Catholic Church in Ireland Helen Meaney Supervisor: Christina Bergqvist Year: Autumn 2016 Words: 13 869 Points: 15 Abstract This thesis will use the final Marriage Equality Referendum debate which took place on the Irish national broadcaster RTÉ in May 2015 and analyse the No campaign’s willingness to be associated with the Catholic Church through discourse and framing analysis. This qualitative study aspires to ascertain the salience of the Catholic Church to the Irish electorate in areas of moral-social policy in Ireland. It will be found that substantial Catholic identification and high levels of religiosity does not necessitate influence of the Church over the electorate. Table of Contents List of Acronyms.................................................................................................... 1 Irish Titles ............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2 Aims and Research Question ............................................................................... 3 Disposition ........................................................................................................... 5 Literature Review .................................................................................................. 6 Theory ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF(All Devices)
    Published by: The Irish Times Limited (Irish Times Books) © The Irish Times 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of The Irish Times Limited, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographic rights organisation or as expressly permitted by law. Acknowledgements A large thank you to all the authors who have contributed to this eBook: Una Mullally, Ursula Halligan, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin, Benedict O Floinn, Stephen McIntyre, Patricia McKenna, Maire Geoghegan Quinn, Heather Barwick, Finn Murray, Noel Whelan, Colm Toibin, Vincent Twomey, Rosaleen, McDonagh, Kathy Sheridan, William Binchy, Diarmaid Ferriter, Breda O’Brien, Fintan O’Toole, Patrick Comerford, Colm O’Gorman, Paddy Monaghan, Derek J. Byrne, Jane Suiter, James Kelly, Juan Carlos Cordovez-Mantilla, David Hoctor, John Holden, Quentin Fottrell, Jensen Byrne, Aoife Byrne, Ronan Mullen, Ivana Bacik, Prof Ray Kinsella, Denis Staunton, Fiach Kelly, Kathy Sheridan, Stephen Collins, Marie O’Halloran, Ruadhan Mac Cormaic, Miriam Lord, Patsy McGarry and David Norris Foreword Ireland's referendum to legalise same-sex marriage was the first of its kind in the world and the campaign to change the Constitution was unlike any the country had seen before. Just over two decades after homosexuality was decriminalised in Ireland, all the political parties represented in parliament and much of civil society came together to back marriage equality. But the campaign was led by a small group of gay and lesbian activists and the most powerful arguments for change came in the form of personal testimonies of individual gay men and lesbians.
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad Éireann
    Vol. 252 Tuesday, No. 6 20 June 2017 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SEANAD ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insert Date Here 20/06/2017A00100Business of Seanad 385 20/06/2017B00150Commencement Matters 386 20/06/2017B00175Schools Building Projects �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������386 20/06/2017E00200Home Care Packages Provision 390 20/06/2017G00400Motorised Transport Grant Closure 392 20/06/2017J00400Child Care Services Provision ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������394 20/06/2017N00100Appointment of Taoiseach, Members of Government, Minister of State and Attorney General 396 20/06/2017N00300Order of Business 399 20/06/2017EE00100Report of Committee on Procedure and Privileges on Standing Order 70A: Motion ������������������������������������������420 20/06/2017EE00400Special Joint Committee on the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution: Motion 420 20/06/2017GG00400Inland Fisheries (Amendment) Bill 2017: Second Stage 424 20/06/2017LL00100Offences against the
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Submitted by Nigel Connor Ba
    A POST GAY IRELAND? EXPLORING THE LEGACY OF THE ‘YES EQUALITY’ CAMPAIGN FOR LGBT+ SOCIAL MOVEMENT LEADERS AND CONSTITUENT MEMBERS. A THESIS SUBMITTED BY NIGEL CONNOR B.A. (P.S.P), M.A FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LITERATURE SOCIOLOGY DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE MAYNOOTH UNIVERSITY, IRELAND DATE OF SUBMISSION OCTOBER 2017 HEAD OF DEPARTMENT: PROF. MARY P. CORCORAN RESEARCH SUPERVISOR: DR. PAULINE CULLEN CONTENTS Abstract 4 Acknowledgments 5 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Research Aims 7 1.2 Exploring social movement success through a Plurality of Voices 8 1.3 Acceptance and LGBT+ People In Ireland 9 1.4 Community, Movement and Identity 10 1.5 Rurality 12 1.6 Key Findings 13 1.7 Contribution 14 2. Methodology 16 2.1 PURPOSE AND VALUES 16 2.2 GOALS AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 16 2.3 PARADIGM AND CRITICAL APPROACHES 17 2.5 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS 20 2.6 SAMPLING: IDENTIFYING KEY ACTORS AND PARTICIPANT GROUPS 21 2.7 METHODOLOGY OF DATA COLLECTION 22 2.7.1 FOCUS GROUPS 22 2.8 PROFILES OF FOCUS GROUP PARTICIPANTS 23 2.8.1 EQUALITY MAYO 24 2.8.2 LONGFORD LGBT 25 2.8.3 DUBLIN FOCUS GROUP 26 2.9 ELITE INTERVIEWS 31 2.9.1 IRISH LGBT+ MOVEMENT ORGANISATIONS 33 2.10 Participant observation 36 2.11 CODING 38 2.12 LIMITATIONS 38 2.12.1 ETHICALLY CONSIDERATIONS TOWARDS PARTICIPANTS 39 3. The Development of the Yes Equality Campaign. 40 3.1 The KAL Case 40 3.2 Agitation for Marriage Rights Begins 41 3.3 The Formation of Marriage Equality and LGBT Noise 42 3.4 Tension caused by Civil Partnership and Civil Marriage 43 3.5 The Introduction of Civil Partnership 45 3.6 The Groundwork for Civil Marriage is Laid 46 1 3.7 The Irish Counter Movement to LGBT+ rights 48 3.8 Yes Equality: Beginnings 49 3.9 Mothers and Fathers Matter 50 3.10 Pantigate 50 3.11 Yes Equality: Messaging and Groundwork 51 3.12 Yes Equality: The Referendum Campaign 53 3.13 Contemporary Issues for Irish LGBT+ people 54 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad Éireann
    Vol. 242 Tuesday, No. 11 20 October 2015 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SeaNad ÉireaNN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insert Date Here 20/10/2015A00100Business of Seanad 529 20/10/2015B00100Commencement Matters 530 20/10/2015B00200Greenways Funding 530 20/10/2015D00500Pensions Levy 532 20/10/2015F00200Hospital Services 535 20/10/2015J00250Housing Provision 538 20/10/2015O00100Order of Business 541 /2015FF00100Proceeds of Sale of Aer Lingus: Motion 559 20/10/2015FF01600Marriage Bill 2015: Second Stage 559 SeaNad ÉireaNN Dé Máirt, 20 Deireadh Fómhair 2015 Tuesday, 20 October 2015 Chuaigh an Cathaoirleach i gceannas ar 230 pm Machnamh agus Paidir. Reflection and Prayer. 20/10/2015a00100Business of Seanad 20/10/2015A00200an Leas-Chathaoirleach: I have received notice from Senator Paschal Mooney that, on the motion for the Commencement of the House today, he proposes to raise the following matter: The need for the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport to outline his Department’s
    [Show full text]
  • UCC Library and UCC Researchers Have Made This Item Openly Available
    UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks! Title Not thinking straight? A critical discourse analysis of the 2006 Irish High Court ruling in Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Attorney General Author(s) Mullins, Jackie (Gertrude Jacqueline) Publication date 2013 Original citation Mullins, J. 2013. Not thinking straight? A critical discourse analysis of the 2006 Irish High Court ruling in Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Attorney General. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Link to publisher's http://library.ucc.ie/record=b2073900 version Access to the full text of the published version may require a subscription. Rights © 2013, Jackie Mullins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/1128 from Downloaded on 2021-10-05T06:48:22Z TITLE PAGE Thesis Title: Not Thinking Straight? A Critical Discourse Analysis of the 2006 Irish High Court Ruling in Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Attorney General Author: Jackie Mullins (Gertrude Jacqueline Mullins) Thesis submitted for PhD Thesis submitted to National University of Ireland, Cork Research conducted under School of Applied Social Studies, UCC Date of Submission: May 2013 Head of School: Professor Fred Powell Supervisors: Dr. Máire Leane and Dr. Jacqui O’Riordan 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................. 2 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 10 What’s the Story? Interrogating the Constitutional and Legislative Position on Same-Sex Marriage in Ireland ............................................ 10 Background to the High Court Ruling .................................................... 12 Research Questions and Rationale .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Potential of Participatory Learning & Action (PLA)
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/183426 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-05 and may be subject to change. Engaging service-users in co-designing primary health care | Mary O’Reilly-de Brún and Tomas de Brún de Brún de Tomas and Brún Tomas and Brún | Mary O’Reilly-de care | Mary O’Reilly-de care health primary health primary co-designing in co-designing in service-users service-users Engaging Engaging Engaging service-users in co-designing primary health care: assessing the potential of Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) Mary O’Reilly-de Brún and Tomas de Brún Engaging service-users in co-designing primary health-care: assessing the potential of Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) Mary O’Reilly-de Brún and Tomas de Brún 516530-L-bw-Reilly Processed on: 24-1-2018 PDF page: 1 Colophon This thesis has been prepared by the Department of Primary and Community Care of the Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The Department of Primary and Community Care participates in the Netherlands School of Primary Care research (CaRe), which has been acknowledged by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) in 1995. Financial support This thesis was made possible by funding support from: Irish Trust Fund, Norwegian Trust Fund and UNICEF, co-ordinated by The World Bank Population and Human Resources Division, Africa Region: re projects in The Gambia, Senegal, Guinea-Bissau and Mauritania (1993 - 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • To the 32Nd Dáil and 25Th Seanad
    Nealon’s Guide To the 32nd Dáil and 25th Seanad Edited by: Tim Ryan Backing Club and County Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c. is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. 07377RO GAA Ad Club nad County A4.indd 1 21/04/2017 16:53 Nealon’s Guide To the 32nd Dáil and 25th Seanad Edited by: Tim Ryan Published by: Grand Canal Consulting Acknowledgements The Irish Times Nealon’s Guide to the 32nd Dáil and 25th Seanad is the thirteenth in the series started by Ted Nealon after the 1973 General Election. I feel privileged to both edit and publish it, in association with The Irish Times which allows for the continuation of a long tradition in producing the best known reference book to the results of Irish general elections. This edition adopts the same general format as previous guides, which has proved hugely popular with readers over the years. The Guide could not have been produced without the help and co-operation of many people. I wish to thank The Irish Times, notably Jim Miley, the Business to Consumer Director. A special thanks to Stephen Collins, who acted as consulting editor, for his tremendous support and invaluable advice throughout the process of producing this edition. I also wish to thank the picture Editor, Frank Miller for assembling the wonderful photographs. I wish to thank Lee Ryan and the team at Design Room for their dedication and commitment in the design and layout of the Guide and in overseeing the printing. Sincere thanks also to Allied Irish Banks for their generous sponsorship of the project and without whom it would not have happened.
    [Show full text]
  • Belfast 4-6 July 2017
    Report of Proceedings of Biennial Delegate Conference 2017 Belfast 4-6 July 2017 1 Tuesday 4 July 2017 Morning Session Kevin Callinan, Vice-President A chairde, cuir fáilte roimh Uachtaráin na hEireann, Michael O’Higin, ladies and gentlemen please welcome the President of Ireland, Michael D Higgins. Brian Campfield, President Okay Conference, thank you very much and thank you for being patient. It’s now my pleasure to introduce and call upon Councillor Nuala McAllister the Lord Mayor of Belfast to give a short welcome to delegates. Nuala McAllister, Councillor Good morning delegates and I welcome you all too sunny Belfast this morning. President Higgins, President of ICTU Brian Campfield, ladies and gentlemen I am delighted to welcome the Irish Congress of Trade Unions Conference to the city of Belfast. It is also a great privilege and honour to extend a very special welcome on behalf of the citizens of Belfast to the President of Ireland Michael D. Higgins. President Higgins it is notable on your first official visit to Belfast in 2012 you gave an address to the Irish Congress of Trade Unions Women’s conference, and so it is a pleasure to welcome you back here today to speak to us all here this morning. Belfast has a very proud trade union history and we actually have two stained glass windows in City Hall to commemorate that heritage. The first window is of James Larkin, a giant in the Irish Labour Movement and the founding father of the Irish Transport and General Workers’ Union. The second window unveilled in 2014 is an illustration of Belfast women mill workers and the struggles that women have faced in our history.
    [Show full text]
  • Same-Sex Marriage and Conservative Christian Values
    Same-Sex Marriage and Conservative Christian Values: A Comparison Between the Republic of Ireland and the State of California (US) from a Post-Legalisation Perspective A dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2020 Bryana Tunder Trinity College Dublin Declaration I declare that this thesis has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other university and it is entirely my own work. I agree to deposit this thesis in the Library of Trinity College Dublin and to allow the Library to lend or copy the thesis on request. I agree to deposit this thesis in the University’s open access institutional repository or allow the library to do so on my behalf, subject to Irish Copyright Legislation and Trinity College Library conditions of use and acknowledgement. Bryana Tunder ii Summary Insufficient research has been done to examine same-sex marriage discourse from a post-legalisation perspective in California and Ireland. This project investigates the topic through the lens of campaigns for and against the legalisation of same-sex marriage in both regions. It examines relational dynamics between pro- and anti-same sex marriage campaigners in California (US) and Ireland because, although different in population size and religious demographics, there are sufficient similarities between the debates, and among the primary activists, to prove informative. Building on existing work that investigates the ideologies involved in this conflict, this project looks at the subject primarily through the experience of the actors most immediately involved in its political campaign. This research identifies ideological, religious and cultural factors that have played significant roles in the facilitation of polarisation between these two groups.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of the Links Between Male Identity and the Development of the Field of Men’S Community Education in Ireland
    An Exploration of the Links between Male Identity and the Development of the Field of Men’s Community Education in Ireland Antonia Owens BA, MA. A Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dublin City University Supervisor: Dr Ann Louise Gilligan Department of Education St. Patrick’s College Drumcondra Dublin 9 October 2004 I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: Candidate I.D. Number: S> U 0 3 \ \ ** D ate:-----------------------------------------------21 Abstract Social, economic, legislative and technological developments ongoing since the 1970s have culminated in profound change in the structure and form of work and of family life today. This changing socio-economic structure has implications for ways in which gender roles and relationships are understood and enacted; and this study is concerned with the impact of such change on men’s, particularly marginalised men’s, understandings of masculinity. While men’s studies as an academic discipline has been developing in the international arena since the 1970s, there is a dearth of scholarship in Ireland on the topic of masculinity; indeed it has only recently emerged as a topic in public discourse. The 1990s witnessed a new social phenomenon in Irish society - the emergence of men’s groups in local communities, some of which receive funding within the community education sector.
    [Show full text]