DOCSLIB.ORG

2020-2025 Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020-2025 Management Plan Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve 2020-2025 Management Plan DRAFT January 2020 Acknowledgements This document was prepared with funds from Grant Award Number NA18NOS420018, Office of Coastal Management (OCM), National Ocean Service (NOS) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce. Principal contributors included: Steve Miller, Coastal Training Program Coordinator; Kelle Loughlin, Education Coordinator; Chris Peter, Research Coordinator; Rachel Stevens, Stewardship Coordinator; Katie Callahan, New Hampshire Fish and Game GIS Specialist; Melissa Brogle, Volunteer Coordinator; Jay Sullivan, Naturalist; Collen McClare, Naturalist; and Cory Riley, Manager. With thanks to Jess Waters and Tricia Miller for editing and formatting services and to Adrianne Harrison of the OCM for guidance and review. i Contents Figures . iii Executive Summary . iv Introduction to the National Estuarine Research Reserve System . 1 Introduction to the Great BayNational Estuarine Research Reserve . 4 GBNERR Strategic Plan . .. 17 Research Plan . 20 Education Plan . 30 Coastal Training Program Plan . 39 Administrative Plan . 48 Volunteer Plan. 56 Resource Protection and Stewardship Plan . 61 Public Access and Visitor Plan . .72 Facilities Development and Improvement Plan . 78. Land Acquisition Plan . 85 Citations . 98 APPENDIX I MOA between NHFG and NOAA . .101 APPENDIX II Federal Consistency Determination . 105 APPENDIX III Public Involvement and Comments . 106 APPENDIX IV Federal Register Notice . 107 APPENDIX V NHFG Organizational Chart . 117 ii Figures Figure 1: National Estuarine Research Reserve System map . 1 Figure 2: Map of Great Bay in relation to Gulf of Maine . 5 Figure 3: Watershed drainage map of the Great Bay region . 6 Figure 4: Map of key estuarine habitats in Great Bay . 9 Figure 5: SLAMM model results demonstrating marsh loss . 13 Figure 6: GBNERR Boundary: 1989 . 15 Figure 7: GBNERR Boundary, 2005 . 16 Figure 8: Map of monitoring sites . .26 Figure 9: GBNERR organizational chart . 49 Figure 10: NHFG Parcels by Primary Protection Type . 65 Figure 11: GBNERR Conservation of Public Lands by Ownership Type . .. 66 Figure 12: GBNERR Public Access map . .74 Figure 13: Great Bay Greenland Campus Map . 80 Figure 14: Buffer and core areas of GBNERR, 2020 . 90 Figure 15: GBNERR 2020 Acquisition Zone . .92 Figure 16: GBNERR 2019 Habitat Priority–Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM) . 93 Figure 17: GBNERR 2017 Habitat Priority–Wildlife Action Plan (WAP) . .94 Figure 18: NHFG Parcels by Primary Protection Type . 96 iii Executive Summary The Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (GBNERR) was designated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in 1989, in large part due to a group of passionate local environmentalists advocating against the construction of an oil refinery along Great Bay’s shores. The passion of the people who staff, support, and participate in Reserve activities continues to fuel the organization today. Over the past thirty years, GBNERR has expanded in size, relevance, and influence on estuarine issues both locally and nationally. Through time, GBNERR has stayed true to the mission of the NERRS as stated in the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 and the implementing regulations for the NERRS (see 15 C.F.R. § 921: herinafter NERRS regulations), while continually assessing how to serve local communities and the host agency, the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department (NHFG). As of 2020, the NOAA-approved Reserve boundary encompasses 10,235 acres of land and water that includes Little Bay, Great Bay, the mouths of five rivers, and over 30 NHFG managed properties within the watershed and along the shores of the bay. New Hampshire has a very small coastline. Great Bay is located 16 miles inland from the Atlantic coast and has seven rivers that flow into the estuary. Most policy and land use decisions that impact habitat and water quality are made at the local level by volunteer boards or elected officials. This creates a powerful motivation to approach GBNERR’s effort from a watershed perspective by working closely with the communities that surround the bay and its tributaries. The integrated science, coastal training, education, and stewardship programs at GBNERR aim to understand the biophysical and social trends in the region, how these trends influence the health of the estuary and well-being of the people that live around the bay, and what appropriate action can be taken from a personal, professional, and political perspective to protect Great Bay. This management plan articulates a five-year vision for GBNERR to continue to mature as a program, deliver science to inform coastal management, and raise awareness of estuaries and their connection to people using a place-based approach. Within the timeframe of this plan, the Reserve aspires to engage more people and different types of people with GBNERR programs and properties; improve program effectiveness and reach through the use of a renewed Advisory Structure; grow the research program; officially expand the Reserve boundary; and create a stable staffing and facilities plan. The efforts of GBNERR are coordinated with partners in the region to understand and mitigate the largest threats to coastal management in New Hampshire. At this time, the key threats and stressors facing Great Bay Reserve and the surrounding communities fall into two interconnected categories: • Land use changes in the New Hampshire Seacoast that impact water quality and habitat. • Climate change, which magnifies the issues related to land use change because of increased precipitation, changes to physical and chemical conditions, and species and habitat shifts. To address these threats, the Reserve sets out the following mission, vision, goals, and objectives: Mission: Practice and promote the stewardship of estuaries through integrated and innovative research, education, resource management, and training in the Great Bay Watershed. Vision: A resilient Great Bay Watershed, where human and natural communities thrive. iv GOAL 1 Coastal scientists and managers understand how Great Bay is functioning now, how it may function in the future, and how that is influenced by and will impact people in the watershed. OBJECTIVES 1.1: To understand, protect, and restore the structure and function of Great Bay estuarine ecosystems 1.2: To understand the vulnerability and resiliency of Great Bay ecosystems and communities in relation to key stressors. 1.3: To protect representative habitats within the NERR that support native wildlife. STRATEGIES • Work with partners to monitor environmental changes within Great Bay over time. • Facilitate and conduct applied and basic research to advance understanding of the structure and function of estuaries. • Facilitate and conduct science to advance understanding of how stressors are impacting the estuary and how habitat, water quality, and built communities may be impacted in the future. • Develop, share, and use the best science available to prioritize and direct restoration and resource protection strategies. • Work with partners to actively protect estuarine land and restore key habitats. • Convene partners to identify and advance science, protection, and restoration priorities in the region. • Translate and communicate GBNERR and other local science results to decision makers and citizens to inspire and enable action. • Identify key coastal management science and technical needs and use that to guide GBNERR and partner efforts. • Engage in the scientific and technical community of New Hampshire and within the NERRS to enhance understanding of Great Bay and advance national understanding of estuarine resources. GOAL 2 People make personal and professional decisions that help restore and protect ecosystem function while advancing social priorities. OBJECTIVES 2.1: Reserve staff understand how people make professional and personal decisions that could impact Great Bay. 2.2: People have clear information that translates local science. 2.3: People understand the potential consequences and trade-offs of their actions and decisions. 2.4: People recognize that they are an integral part of the Great Bay ecosystem and are inspired to and supported in making choices that protect and restore Great Bay. STRATEGIES: • Advance the understanding of personal and professional motivations and behavior change theory, and apply that to education, outreach, stewardship, and volunteer programming. • Create or enhance outdoor experiences that inspire an engaged citizenry to act on behalf of the health of Great Bay. • Translate science and coastal management questions in a tailored way is appropriate and relevant to specific audiences. • Enhance opportunities for multi-directional dialogue and collaborative idea generation about what the key coastal issues are in the region and how to solve them. • Deliver high quality training and education programs that demonstrate how people and the estuary are interdependent and give participants practical information and tools to change how they work and act. • Encourage investigation and communication about trade-offs between different policy, restoration, and behavioral decisions. • Work with the Great Bay Stewards to engage a larger and more diverse group of people to participate, volunteer, and experience GBNERR and GBNERR programs. v Awards and Achievements The last management plan for the Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve was approved by NOAA in 2006.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FALL 2016 Newsletter of the Washington Chapter of the Wildlife Society
    Page | 1 The WashingtonTHE WASHINGTON WILDLIFER Wildlifer FALL 2016 Newsletter of the Washington Chapter of The Wildlife Society MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT meeting. During the banquet at the annual meeting each year Danielle Munzing we give out awards to biologists, organizations, and landowners. The last couple of years I have been involved Happy Fall, Wildlife Society with WA-TWS, I have been surprised that we haven’t members! Time for wool socks, a hot received more nominations. Last month during our board drink in the thermos, and dark skies at meeting, I asked everyone to do some homework and I would 1630. Across Washington, wildlife like to ask the same of each of you. biologists will be busy with their winter work, whether it’s surveying Do you know someone who deserves to be recognized? big game, writing reports, or planning Consider nominating that person for the 2017 awards season. the 2017 annual conference. That’s right, your Washington There are EIGHT different awards available from the Chapter is hard at work with the Washington State Society of Chapter. American Foresters to bring you an incredible 4 days of I think many of us know someone who: workshops, speaker sessions, delicious food, and opportunities to socialize and network. All of this will be Does more than they need to taking place in the heart of Central Washington, at the Red Makes valuable and unique contributions to wildlife Lion Hotel and Convention Center in Yakima. The theme for conservation this year is Forests and Wildlife: Responding to Change. Uses foresight to address problems early As you can imagine, there will be a lot to talk about and we Shows their dedication are bringing together experts in both forestry and wildlife to Shows exceptional leadership inspire discussions ranging from white-nose syndrome to Established partnerships that would not have existed forest health and ecological integrity and so much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Map6-1 Priority Species Table
    Conservation areas sorted by quartile for conservation value and vulnerability, and weighted toward species factors. Low, medium low, medium high, and high correspond to the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively. No marine areas are included in this list. Vulnerability Low Medium Low Medium High High Basket Butte Camp Creek Ridge Bald Hill Black River - Mima Prairie Central Texada Island Cranberry Creek Blackjack-Harewood Camassia Dunn Forest EE Wilson Ebey's Landing Corvallis-Philomath Oaks Grays Marsh Fern Ridge Reservoir Fidalgo Head, Burrows Island Drews Prairie Indian Head/Horse Rock Ridge James Island Fidalgo Island Green River Mt. Maxwell Jones Island Fort Lewis - McChord Lacamas Meadows Snoqualmie Foothill Forest McDonald Forest/Soap Creek Forest and Golden Valley North Santiam River Riparian Upper Siuslaw Site Balds Kingston Prairie Rocky Prairie - Beaver Creek Wasp-Yellow Islands Mt Pisgah Luckiamute River Riparian Sandy River Cypress-Sinclair Islands Reginald Hill Muddy Creek/Finley Satsop Watershed Lasqueti Island Rocky Point, BC North Texada Island Sauvie Island Saturna Island Rocky Point, WA Scatter Creek High Shumocher Creek Stout Mountain South Fork Yamhill River Trial Island Thetis-Frances Washougal Oaks - Steigerwald Weir Prairie and Forest Tuam-Bruce West Eugene/Spencer Creek Active Pass Willamette Narrows Comox Macrosite Discovery Island Ladysmith-Yellow Point Cowichan Pender Harbor Moran Deception Pass Conservation Value Quilcene Sea to Sea Greenbelt Discovery Passage Sucia-Matia-Patos Islands Thorndyke
    [Show full text]
  • Map6-2 Priority Landscape Table
    Conservation areas sorted by quartile for conservation value and vulnerability, and weighted toward landscape factors. Low, medium low, medium high, and high correspond to the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively. No marine areas are included in this list. Vulnerability Low Medium Low Medium High High Basket Butte Cowlitz Forest Corridor Bald Hill Black River - Mima Prairie Central Texada Island Cranberry Creek Blackjack-Harewood Camassia Indian Head/Horse Rock Ridge EE Wilson Clear Creek Clackamas Lilliwaup Forest Park-Coast Range Coast Fork/Middle Fork Willamette Corvallis-Philomath Oaks Mt. Maxwell Lower Skookumchuck Riparian Drews Prairie Snoqualmie Foothill Forest McDonald Forest/Soap Creek Forest and Ebey's Landing Eola Hills Upper Siuslaw Site Balds Fidalgo Head, Burrows Island Jackson Fraiser Wetlands Cypress-Sinclair Islands Mt Pisgah Fidalgo Island Lacamas Meadows Lasqueti Island Reginald Hill Fort Lewis - McChord North Santiam River Riparian Nelson Island Rocky Point, BC HABECK Oaks Rocky Prairie - Beaver Creek Saturna Island Kingston Prairie Satsop Watershed Shumocher Creek Lane Community College Basin Sauvie Island Sultan Foothill Forest Luckiamute River Riparian Scatter Creek High Timber Grove Muddy Creek/Finley Washougal Oaks - Steigerwald Trial Island Rocky Point, WA West Eugene/Spencer Creek Weir Prairie and Forest Thetis-Frances Comox Macrosite Active Pass Toutle Forest Corridor Cowichan Discovery Island Tuam-Bruce Deception Pass Quilcene Willamette Narrows Discovery Passage Conservation Value Tarboo-Dabob
    [Show full text]
  • Branta Bernicla) in HOOD CANAL and LOWER PUGET SOUND
    Washington Birds 10:1-10 (2008) BREEDING ORIGINS AND POPULATIONS OF WINTERING AND SPRING MIGRANT BRANT (Branta bernicla) IN HOOD CANAL AND LOWER PUGET SOUND Bryan L. Murphie Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 48 Devonshire Road, Montesano, Washington 98563 [email protected] Greg A. Schirato Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 48 Devonshire Road, Montesano, Washington 98563 [email protected] Don K. Kraege Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501 [email protected] Dave H. Ward U.S. Geological Service, Alaska Fish and Wildlife Research Center 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 [email protected] James C. Sedinger University of Nevada 1000 Valley Road Reno, Nevada 89557 [email protected] James E. Hines Canadian Wildlife Service Suite 301 - 5204, 50th Ave. Yellowknife, Northwest Territories X1A 1E2 [email protected] Karen S. Bollinger U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Management 1412 Airport Way, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 [email protected] Brant (Branta bernicla) migrate and winter along the west coast of North America (Reed et al. 1989). These geese originate from breeding colonies in Alaska, Northwest Territories, Yukon, and northeastern Russia (Einarsen 1965, Palmer 1976, Bellrose 1980, Reed et al. 1989). The population was recently estimated at approximately 130,000 birds (Trost 1998, Wahl et al. 2005). Mexico has been recognized as a major wintering area for 2 Murphie et al. Brant (Smith and Jensen 1970) and Washington, especially Puget Sound, supports the largest concentration of Brant north of Mexico in winter and >90% of the Brant during northward migration (Pacific Flyway Council 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Witd Attd Scettic "Ri()E1t Stadr "Repo1tt
    Ri.;-~, vev.:i A-':> l/1711at'U'"vr /J<.va AerJl../G.. /IS'iii·r. 1/1;([~~c":.b;f.. (i..C../J,~T!vt,~l.{·s NG~ oF r.Jv1,.,r I~ 1'?'7$ THE /2£;; 'te.t ~IU { 0 /~yu,,,/:--(,/tit,.J> J~<t 1L10 Witd attd Scettic "Ri()e1t Stadr "Repo1tt TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I - SUMMATION CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT ............................................2 AGENCY INTERPRETATION ...................................................2 STUDY RIVERS ..............................................................2 STUDY APPROACH ..........................................................4 CHAPTER2-SUMMARYOF FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS ......................... FINDINGS ..................................................................4 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................5 PART II - THE STUDY CHAPTER 1 - INVENTORY .......................................................... -8 THE DRAINAGE BASIN .......................................................8 THE STUDY AREA .......................................................... · 10 CHAPTER2-EVALUATION OF RIVERS &ADJOINING LANDS CRITERIA USED ............................................................ 13 ANALYSIS ................................................................. 15 OUTSTANDING CHARACTERISTICS ........................................... 20 CHAPTER 3 -CLASSIFICATION ALTERNATIVES, ANALYSIS & SELECTION OF STUDY PROPOSAL BASIS OF ANALYSIS ........................................................ 23 THE PRESENT SITUATION ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Laconner Bike Maps
    LaConner Bike Maps On andLaConner off-road bike routes Bike in LaConner,Maps West Skagit County, and with Regional Bike Trails June 2011 fireplaces, and private decks or balconies, The Channel continental breakfast, located blocks from the Lodge historic downtown. Ranked #1 Bed and Waterfront Breakfast in LaConner by TripAdvisor Members. boutique hotel 121 Maple Avenue, LaConner, WA 98257 with 24 rooms 800-477-1400, 360-466-1400 featuring www.wildiris.com private [email protected] balconies, gas fireplaces, Jacuzzi bathtubs, spa services, The Heron continental breakfast, business center, Inn & Day Spa conference room, and evening music and wine Elegant French bar in the lobby. Transient boat dock adjoins Country style the waterfront landing for hotel guests and dog-friendly, visitors. bed and PO Box 573, LaConner, WA 98257 breakfast inn 888-466-4113, 360-466-3101 with Craftsman www.laconnerlodging.com Style furnishings, fireplaces, Jacuzzi, full [email protected] service day spa staffed with massage therapists and estheticians, continental breakfast, located LaConner blocks from the historic downtown. Country Inn 117 Maple Avenue, LaConner, WA 98257 Downtown 360-399-1074 boutique hotel www.theheroninn.com with 28 rooms [email protected] providing gas fireplaces, Katy’s Inn Jacuzzi Historic building bathtubs, converted into cozy continental 4 room bed and breakfast, spa services, business center, breakfast with conference and 40-70 person meeting room private baths, wrap- facilities including breakout rooms, and around porch with adjoining bar and restaurant (Nell Thorne). views, patio, hot PO Box 573, LaConner, WA 98257 tub, continental 888-466-4113, 360-466-3101 breakfast, and cookies and milk at bedtime, www.laconnerlodging.com located a block from the historic downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2011 Vol. 30 No. 1
    V30 N1-Spring-11_v4 12/14/11 8:58 PM Page i New Hampshire Bird Records Spring 2011 Vol. 30, No. 1 V30 N1-Spring-11_v4 12/14/11 8:58 PM Page ii AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE New Hampshire Bird Records Volume 30, Number 1 Spring 2011 Managing Editor: Rebecca Suomala 603-224-9909 X309, [email protected] Text Editor: Dan Hubbard Season Editors: Eric Masterson/Lauren Kras/ Ben Griffith, Spring; Tony Vazzano, Summer; Pamela Hunt, Winter Layout: Kathy McBride Assistants: Jeannine Ayer, David Deifik, Dave Howe, Margot Johnson, Susan MacLeod, Marie Nickerson, Carol Plato, William Taffe, Tony Vazzano Field Notes: Robert A. Quinn Photo Quiz: David Donsker Photo Editor: Len Medlock Web Master: Len Medlock Where to Bird: Phil Brown Editorial Team: Phil Brown, Hank Chary, David Deifik, David Donsker, Ben Griffith, Dan Hubbard, Pam Hunt, Lauren Kras, Iain MacLeod, Len Medlock, Robert A. Quinn, Rebecca Suomala, William Taffe, Tony Vazzano, Jon Woolf Cover Photo: Ruff (foreground) with Greater Yellowlegs by Len Medlock, 04/21/11, Chapman’s Landing, Stratham, NH. New Hampshire Bird Records is published quarterly by New Hampshire Audubon’s Conservation Department. Thank you to the many observers who submit their sightings to NH eBird (www.ebird.org/nh), the source of data for this publication. Records are selected for publication and not all species reported will appear in the issue. The published sightings typi- cally represent the highlights of the season. All records are subject to review by the NH Rare Birds Committee and publi- cation of reports here does not imply future acceptance by the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Shoreline Protection Assessment for Skagit County
    Marine Shoreline Protection Assessment for Skagit County Shoreline property on Samish Island with Skagit Land Trust Conservation Easement. SLT files. Prepared for and with funding from: Skagit County Marine Resources Committee Prepared by: Kari Odden, Skagit Land Trust This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Table of Contents Tables, Figures and Maps…………………………………………………………………………………..3 Introduction and Background…………………………………………………………………………….4 Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 Results……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………24 Tidelands Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………….25 Data limitations………………………………………………………………………………………………..31 References…………………………………………………………………………………………………….…32 Appendix A: Protection Assessment Data Index……………………………………………..………..33 Appendix B: Priority Reach Metrics…………………………………………………………..……………..38 Marine Shoreline Protection Assessment for Skagit Co Page 2 Tables Table 1: Samish Bay Management Unit Priority Reaches………………………………………..……...13 Table 2: Padilla Bay Management Unit Priority Reaches……………………………………………..….15 Table 3: Swinomish Management Unit Priority Reaches……………………………………………..….17 Table 4: Islands Management Unit Priority Reaches…………………………………………………….…19
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air
    Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air Canada (Alberta – VE6/VA6) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S87.1 Issue number 2.2 Date of issue 1st August 2016 Participation start date 1st October 2012 Authorised Association Manager Walker McBryde VA6MCB Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged Page 1 of 63 Document S87.1 v2.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) 1 Change Control ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Association Reference Data ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Programme derivation ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 General information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Rights of way and access issues ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Maps and navigation .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Safety considerations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LITTLETON – Law Enforcement Officials Are Learning That Social Me- UNH Coop
    www.newhampshirelakesandmountains.com Publishing news & views of Lancaster, Groveton, Whitefield, Lunenburg & other towns of the upper Connecticut River valley of New Hampshire & Vermont [email protected] VOL. CXLIV, NO. 8 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2012 LANCASTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE TELEPHONE: 603-788-4939 TWENTY-EIGHT PAGES 75¢ Budget Maple syrup-making likely in February Committee By Edith Tucker [email protected] resists efforts LANCASTER — Sugarmaker Dave Fuller of Lancaster started to fully fund “catching some sap” — 500 gal- lons — on Friday, Feb. 17 in a sug- arbush off Route 2, he explained Police on Saturday in his busy retail shop where he and his wife Patti Department sell supplies for other sugarmak- ers, maple syrup and candies, By Mike Fournier and hard-to-find northern New Contributing Writer Hampshire gifts. NORTHUMBERLAND – De- If the weather turns out to be spite encouragement from audi- as predicted, Fuller says he will ence members at the Feb. 15 pub- probably be boiling by the end of lic hearing on the proposed 2012 the week — well before Leap Year town budget, members of the Day — at Fuller’s Sugarhouse on PHOTO BY EDITH TUCKER budget committee resisted ef- Main Street. Sugarmakers across the North Country are getting ready for what forts to restore full funding for “The earliest I’ve ever boiled appears will be a record-breaking early sap run. Dave Fuller of Fuller’s the town’s police department. before was just barely in Febru- Sugarhouse in Lancaster sold Steve Tilton of Groveton, who operates The two and one-half hour ary — and that was just once,” Tilton’s Sugarhouse with his wife Brenda, some tubing and other equip- meeting, attended by less than he said, noting that he and his ment on Saturday.
    [Show full text]
  • SAMISH RIVER Geographic Response Plan (SAMR-GRP)
    Northwest Area Committee JUNE 2017 SAMISH RIVER Geographic Response Plan (SAMR-GRP) SAMISH RIVER GRP JUNE 2017 SAMISH RIVER Geographic Response Plan (SAMR-GRP) June 2017 2 SAMISH RIVER GRP JUNE 2017 Spill Response Contact Sheet Required Notifications for Oil Spills & Hazardous Substance Releases Federal Notification ‐ National Response Center (800) 424‐8802* State Notification ‐ Washington Emergency Management Division (800) 258‐5990* ‐ Other Contact Numbers ‐ U.S. Coast Guard Washington State Sector Puget Sound (206) 217‐6200 Dept Archaeology & Historic Preservation (360) 586‐3065 ‐ Emergency / Watchstander (206) 217‐6001* Dept of Ecology ‐ Command Center (206) 217‐6002* ‐ Headquarters (Lacey) (360) 407‐6000 ‐ Incident Management (206) 217‐6214 ‐ NW Regional Office (Bellevue) (425) 649‐7000 13th Coast Guard District (800) 982‐8813 ‐ Bellingham Field Office (360) 715‐5200 National Strike Force (252) 331‐6000 Dept of Fish and Wildlife (360) 902‐2200 ‐ Pacific Strike Team (415) 883‐3311 ‐ Emergency HPA Assistance (360) 902‐2537* ‐ Oil Spill Team (360) 534‐8233* U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Dept of Health (800) 525‐0127 Region 10 – Spill Response (206) 553‐1263* ‐ Drinking Water (800) 521‐0323 ‐ Washington Ops Office (360) 753‐9437 Dept of Natural Resources (360) 902‐1064 ‐ RCRA / CERCLA Hotline (800) 424‐9346 ‐ After normal business hours (360) 556‐3921 ‐ Public Affairs (206) 553‐1203 Dept of Transportation (360) 705‐7000 State Parks & Recreation Commission (360) 902‐8613 National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration State Patrol ‐ District 7 (360) 654‐1204* Scientific Support Coordinator (206) 526‐6829 Weather (NWS Seattle) (206) 526‐6087 Tribal Contacts Samish Indian Nation (360) 293‐6404 Other Federal Agencies Upper Skagit Indian Tribe (360) 854‐7090 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lime Kiln Point State Park (San Juan Island)
    Ranald MacDonald’s Grave Your guide to state parks in the Auto-accessible parks Auto-accessible parks Lime Kiln Point State Park Moran State Park Spencer Spit State Park Obstruction Pass State Park Welcome (San Juan Island) (Orcas Island) (Lopez Island) (Orcas Island) San Juan The San Juan archipelago north of Puget At Lime Kiln Point State Park, the loud neighbors Pass through the welcome arch at Moran State Spencer Spit on Lopez Island provides dramatic Obstruction Pass State Park is one of the few Sound is like no other place on earth. The cluster gear up for a party that runs from spring into Park, and time begins to slow. You’ll find yourself views of Decatur and Blakely islands and Mount public beaches on famed Orcas Island. of 400 islands and rocks in the Salish Sea is a fall. Those would be the spouting Orcas, fin- in a Northwest island frame of mind, free to relax, Constitution on Orcas Island, and it features a Though most people flock to its bigger world unto itself. It is a world where people are slapping gray whales, barking sea lions and breathe and head into the vast, varied terrain. rare sand spit enclosed by a salt-chuck lagoon. neighbor, Moran State Park, this property’s friendly and hearty, where the land smells like splashing porpoises. Hike, cycle or drive to the summit of Mount The effect is a driftwood-scattered beach on quiet beauty is unsurpassed. Clear waters lap at the sea, and wind, art and history are celebrated. Constitution for expansive views of the San Juan one side of the spit and a spongy marsh on the pebbly beaches, and madrone trees cling to Obstruction Pass Islands For island dwellers and visitors, the pace of life other.
    [Show full text]