THE WILLIAM RANDOLPH HEARST COLLECTION Photographs And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lessons from Tobacco Industry Efforts During the 1980S to Open Closed Cigarette Markets in Thailand
Practice BMJ Glob Health: first published as 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004288 on 26 January 2021. Downloaded from How to combat efforts to overturn bans on electronic nicotine delivery systems: lessons from tobacco industry efforts during the 1980s to open closed cigarette markets in Thailand 1,2 1 Roengrudee Patanavanich , Stanton A Glantz To cite: Patanavanich R, ABSTRACT Summary box Glantz SA. How to combat Until 1990, it was illegal for transnational tobacco efforts to overturn bans on companies (TTCs) to sell cigarettes in Thailand. We ► Since 2017, Philip Morris International has worked electronic nicotine delivery reviewed and analysed internal tobacco industry systems: lessons from in parallel with a pro- e- cigarette group in efforts to documents relevant to the Thai market during the 1980s. tobacco industry efforts force the Thai market to open to electronic nicotine TTCs’ attempts to access the Thai cigarette market during during the 1980s to open delivery systems (ENDS). the 1980s concentrated on political lobbying, advertising closed cigarette markets in ► As of January 2021, ENDS were still illegal in and promotion of the foreign brands that were illegal to sell Thailand. BMJ Global Health Thailand. 2021;6:e004288. doi:10.1136/ in Thailand at the time. They sought to take advantage of ► Tobacco industry’s efforts to open ENDS markets are bmjgh-2020-004288 the Thai Tobacco Monopoly’s (TTM) inefficiency to propose like their past efforts to liberalise closed cigarette licencing agreements and joint ventures with TTM and markets during the 1980s. Handling editor Eduardo took advantages of unclear regulations about cigarette ► The transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) at- Gómez marketing to promote their products through advertising tempts to open Thailand’s closed cigarette market in and sponsorship activities. -
Smokefree Casinos and Gambling Facilities
SMOKEFREE CASINOS AND GAMBLING FACILITIES SMOKEFREE MODEL POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION TOOLKIT Smokefree Casinos and Gambling Facilities OCTOBER 2013 State-Regulated Gaming Facilities There are now more than 500 smokefree casinos and gambling facilities in the U.S. It is required by law in 20 states, a growing number of cities, and in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands. In addition, a growing number of sovereign American Indian tribes have made their gambling jobsites smokefree indoors (see page 9). Note: This list does not include all off-track betting (OTB) facilities. To view a map of U.S. States and territories that require state-regulated gaming facilities to be 100% smokefree, go to www.no-smoke.org/pdf/100smokefreecasinos.pdf. Arizona Crystal Casino and Hotel ..........Compton Apache Greyhound Park ..........Apache Junction Club Caribe Casino ...............Cudahy Turf Paradise Racecourse .........Phoenix Del Mar ..........................Del Mar Rillito Park Race Track ............Tucson The Aviator Casino ................Delano Tucson Greyhound Park ..........Tucson St. Charles Place ..................Downieville Tommy’s Casino and Saloon. El Centro California Oaks Card Club ...................Emeryville Golden Gate Fields ................Albany S & K Card Room .................Eureka Kelly’s Cardroom .................Antioch Folsom Lake Bowl Nineteenth Hole ..................Antioch Sports Bar and Casino ............Folsom Santa Anita Park ..................Arcadia Club One Casino ..................Fresno Deuces Wild Casino -
Menthol Content in U.S. Marketed Cigarettes
HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Nicotine Manuscript Author Tob Res. Author Manuscript Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 July 01. Published in final edited form as: Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 July ; 18(7): 1575–1580. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv162. Menthol Content in U.S. Marketed Cigarettes Jiu Ai, Ph.D.1, Kenneth M. Taylor, Ph.D.1, Joseph G. Lisko, M.S.2, Hang Tran, M.S.2, Clifford H. Watson, Ph.D.2, and Matthew R. Holman, Ph.D.1 1Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993 2Tobacco Products Laboratory, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA Abstract Introduction—In 2011 menthol cigarettes accounted for 32 percent of the market in the United States, but there are few literature reports that provide measured menthol data for commercial cigarettes. To assess current menthol application levels in the U.S. cigarette market, menthol levels in cigarettes labeled or not labeled to contain menthol was determined for a variety of contemporary domestic cigarette products. Method—We measured the menthol content of 45whole cigarettes using a validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method (GC/MS). Results—In 23 cigarette brands labeled as menthol products, the menthol levels of the whole cigarette ranged from 2.9 to 19.6 mg/cigarette, with three products having higher levels of menthol relative to the other menthol products. The menthol levels for 22 cigarette products not labeled to contain menthol ranged from 0.002 to 0.07 mg/cigarette. -
Derby Reference Manual Version 10.12
Derby Reference Manual Version 10.12 Derby Document build: September 20, 2015, 7:00:40 AM (PDT) Version 10.12 Derby Reference Manual Contents Copyright..............................................................................................................................11 License................................................................................................................................. 12 About this guide..................................................................................................................16 Purpose of this document...................................................................................... 16 Audience................................................................................................................... 16 How this guide is organized...................................................................................16 SQL syntax used in this manual............................................................................17 SQL language reference.....................................................................................................18 Capitalization and special characters....................................................................18 SQL identifiers ........................................................................................................ 18 Rules for SQL identifiers..................................................................................... 19 SQLIdentifier....................................................................................................... -
Massachusetts
TOWN OF LEXINGTON MASSACHUSETTS ANNUAL REPORT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Town of Lexington, Massachusetts CONTENTS TOWN GOVERNMENT Economic Development TOWN REPORT COMMITTEE Advisory Committee .......................... 96 Select Board ........................................ 3 Chair: Fence Viewers ................................... 96 Nancy C. Cowen Town Manager ..................................... 7 Fund for Lexington ............................ 97 Town Clerk/Board of Registrars ........ 10 Editorial Staff: Greenways Corridor Committee ........ 97 State Presidential Primary Election ... 11 Gloria Amirault Hanscom Area Towns Carmen Mincy Annual Town Election ........................ 19 Committees (HATS) ........................... 97 Karyn Mullins Special Town Meeting (Nov 12) ......... 22 Historical Commission ...................... 98 Susan Myerow Annual Town Meeting Minutes .......... 24 Historic Districts Commission ........... 99 Greta Peterson Senators and Representatives .......... 36 Housing Authority .............................. 99 Robert Ruxin Elected Town Officials ....................... 37 Housing Partnership Board ............. 100 Layout: Victoria Sax Moderator .......................................... 37 Human Rights Committee ............... 100 Town Meeting Members Human Services Committee ........... 101 Printer: Lexington Public Schools Association (TMMA) .......................... 38 Print Center Lexington Center Committee .......... 102 Cary Memorial Library ....................... 41 500 copies printed Lexington -
Pork Chops 1968 Taxes
\ V ' ■ ■' TUESDAY, FEBRUARY < 1964 Avomce Dnfly Net P re « R ub 5 3 For the Weak Ended Faewael of E; A ^ lKetttr6ip0lrr SontfttQ Herald February 1,1964 '■'' *■' ■ ment heads Should not corns fMr9oM||fcL'vv4iiaehGR4 Manchester High School PTO ’Ihe Uttle ’Theater of Man' Manchester Orange wUI meet from extra • ourrlcular pay 13,889 so. e M r , p will have an Open House Thurs cheater will meet Wednesday at tcmorrcm at 8 .pm. at Orange. nmwH tsa mt Town Teachers Voice Oppositwh sources, sbios their work Is not MOmbCr of the AudH tajr. ngfe it love 490. day from 7:80 to 9:30 p.m. and 8 p.m. in Ka bagement club- HaO. ’Iliere w ill be an auction extra-curricular. not Tuesday, as Incorrectly rooma at 45 School St Mem table. Mrs. Anna Robb and her Bureau of OireulatUm Mmehestor—^A CUy o f ViUdga Charm printed in the High School bers will woihr on projects for commlittee will serve refrrab- (6) The ration plan. In f o w ilin iP ' : 1^ ^ 9 «r ia n e E. SouthergUI, To Boar^Es Extra Pay Plan since lost September on a trial ' dMigfater o f M fi and Mra. L. ft World section of Friday’s Her "The Barretts ■ of Wimpole ments. ald. Street’’ ’The play will be pre basis, should be retained. Southei^, 8 Hendee Rd., waa The prof essional psrsonnelAllshed for each job, and that the MANCHESTER, CONN., WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1964 «E rmUM AdraeMilng tm Page IS) PRICE SEVEN CENTS Initiated into Nu Chapter of sented Feb. -
Vaping and E-Cigarettes: Adding Fuel to the Coronavirus Fire?
Vaping and e-cigarettes: Adding fuel to the coronavirus fire? abcnews.go.com/Health/vaping-cigarettes-adding-fuel-coronavirus-fire/story By Dr. Chloë E. Nunneley 26 March 2020, 17:04 6 min read Vaping and e-cigarettes: Adding fuel to the coronavirus fire?Because vaping can cause dangerous lung and respiratory problems, experts say it makes sense that the habit could aggravate the symptoms of COVID-19. New data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last week warns that young people may be more impacted by COVID-19 than was initially thought, with patients under the age of 45 comprising more than a third of all cases, and one in five of those patients requiring hospitalization. Although scientists still don’t have good data to explain exactly why some young people are getting very sick from the novel coronavirus, some experts are now saying that the popularity of e-cigarettes and vaping could be making a bad situation even worse. Approximately one in four teens in the United States vapes or smokes e-cigarettes, with the FDA declaring the teenage use of these products a nationwide epidemic and the CDC warning about a life-threatening vaping illness called EVALI, or “E-cigarette or Vaping- Associated Lung Injury.” Public health experts believe that conventional cigarette smokers are likely to have more serious illness if they become infected with COVID-19, according to the World Health Organization. Because vaping can also cause dangerous lung and respiratory problems, 1/4 experts say it makes sense that the habit could aggravate the symptoms of COVID-19, although they will need longer-term studies to know for sure. -
Aberrant Epithelial Differentiation by Cigarette Smoke Dysregulates Respiratory Host Defence
ORIGINAL ARTICLE BASIC SCIENCE Aberrant epithelial differentiation by cigarette smoke dysregulates respiratory host defence Gimano D. Amatngalim1,3, Jasmijn A. Schrumpf1,3, Fernanda Dishchekenian1, Tinne C.J. Mertens1, Dennis K. Ninaber1, Abraham C. van der Linden1, Charles Pilette2, Christian Taube1, Pieter S. Hiemstra 1 and Anne M. van der Does1 Affiliations: 1Dept of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale & Clinique (IREC), Pôle Pneumologie, ORL & Dermatologie, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Brussels, Belgium. 3Both authors contributed equally. Correspondence: Anne M. van der Does, Dept of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] @ERSpublications Loss of highly expressed host defence proteins as a result of cigarette smoke-induced airway epithelial remodelling http://ow.ly/Q6Jr30iR6Jg Cite this article as: Amatngalim GD, Schrumpf JA, Dishchekenian F, et al. Aberrant epithelial differentiation by cigarette smoke dysregulates respiratory host defence. Eur Respir J 2018; 51: 1701009 [https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01009-2017]. ABSTRACT It is currently unknown how cigarette smoke-induced airway remodelling affects highly expressed respiratory epithelial defence proteins and thereby mucosal host defence. Localisation of a selected set of highly expressed respiratory epithelial host defence proteins was assessed in well-differentiated primary bronchial epithelial cell (PBEC) cultures. Next, PBEC were cultured at the air–liquid interface, and during differentiation for 2–3 weeks exposed daily to whole cigarette smoke. Gene expression, protein levels and epithelial cell markers were subsequently assessed. In addition, functional activities and persistence of the cigarette smoke-induced effects upon cessation were determined. -
NVWA Nr. Merk/Type Nicotine (Mg/Sig) NFDPM (Teer)
NVWA nr. Merk/type Nicotine (mg/sig) NFDPM (teer) (mg/sig) CO (mg/sig) 89537347 Lexington 1,06 12,1 7,6 89398436 Camel Original 0,92 11,7 8,9 89398339 Lucky Strike Original Red 0,88 11,4 11,6 89398223 JPS Red 0,87 11,1 10,9 89399459 Bastos Filter 1,04 10,9 10,1 89399483 Belinda Super Kings 0,86 10,8 11,8 89398347 Mantano 0,83 10,8 7,3 89398274 Gauloises Brunes 0,74 10,7 10,1 89398967 Winston Classic 0,94 10,6 11,4 89399394 Titaan Red 0,75 10,5 11,1 89399572 Gauloises 0,88 10,5 10,6 89399408 Elixyr Groen 0,85 10,4 10,9 89398266 Gauloises Blondes Blue 0,77 10,4 9,8 89398886 Lucky Strike Red Additive Free 0,85 10,3 10,4 89537266 Dunhill International 0,94 10,3 9,9 89398932 Superkings Original Black 0,92 10,1 10,1 89537231 Mark 1 New Red 0,78 10 11,2 89399467 Benson & Hedges Gold 0,9 10 10,9 89398118 Peter Stuyvesant Red 0,82 10 10,9 89398428 L & M Red Label 0,78 10 10,5 89398959 Lambert & Butler Original Silver 0,91 10 10,3 89399645 Gladstone Classic 0,77 10 10,3 89398851 Lucky Strike Ice Gold 0,75 9,9 11,5 89537223 Mark 1 Green 0,68 9,8 11,2 89393671 Pall Mall Red 0,84 9,8 10,8 89399653 Chesterfield Red 0,75 9,8 10 89398371 Lucky strike Gold 0,76 9,7 11,1 89399599 Marlboro Gold 0,78 9,6 10,3 89398193 Davidoff Classic 0,88 9,6 10,1 89399637 Marlboro Red 100 0,79 9,6 9 89398878 Lucky Strike Ice 0,71 9,5 10,9 89398045 Pall Mall Red 0,81 9,5 10,5 89398355 Dunhill Master Blend Red 0,82 9,5 9,8 89399475 JPS Red 0,81 9,5 9,6 89398029 Marlboro Red 0,79 9,5 9 89537355 Elixyr Red 0,79 9,4 9,8 89398037 Marlboro Menthol 0,72 9,3 10,3 89399505 Marlboro -
2019-Annual Report
i o aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,,,;;,,,,„ ,,,,,,, U f a I I i l f o/ l i 0 111111III"" 1111111::::::::,111111III"" Council on Aging ............................. 102 TOWN REPORT COMMITTEE NG ERN ENT Board of Selectmen ............................. 3 Design Advisory Committee ............ 103 Chair: Economic Development Nancy C. Cowen Town Manager ..................................... 6 Advisory Committee ........................ 104 Town Clerk/Board of Registrars .......... 9 Editorial Staff: Fence Viewers ................................. 104 State Primary Election ....................... 10 Gloria Amirault Fund for Lexington .......................... 104 State Election .................................... 16 Janice Litwin Greenways Corridor Committee ...... 105 Special Town Meeting ....................... 20 Susan Myerow Hanscom Area Towns Varsha Ramanathan Annual Town Election ........................ 23 Committees (HATS) ......................... 105 Town Meeting Members .................... 26 Layout: Victoria Sax Historical Commission .................... 106 Annual Town Meeting Minutes .......... 29 Printer: Lexington Public Schools Historic Districts Commission ......... 107 Print Center Elected Town Officials ....................... 47 Housing Authority ............................ 107 Senators and Representatives .......... 48 600 copies printed Housing Partnership Board ............. 108 Moderator .......................................... 49 Also available at Human Rights Committee ............... 108 Town Meeting Members http://records.lexingtonma.gov/weblink -
Municipalities with Local 100% Smokefree Laws Currently in Effect As of July 1, 2021
Municipalities with Local 100% Smokefree Laws Currently in effect as of July 1, 2021 Note: The jurisdiction(s) affected by county-level laws vary widely. Look for a plus symbol (+) next to each county with a law that includes both incorporated and unincorporated areas. A county without a symbol means that the county law covers unincorporated areas only. Only municipalities with ordinances or regulations that do not allow smoking in attached bars or separately ventilated rooms and do not have size exemptions are listed here. A state or local municipality can pass a Non- Hospitality Workplace*, Restaurant**, or Bar law, or any combination of the three. For state law information, please see the last pages. 100% Smokefree 100% 100% Smokefree Municipality State Non-Hospitality Smokefree Freestanding Bars Workplaces Restaurants 1. Anchorage AK Yes Yes Yes 2. Dillingham AK Yes Yes 3. Fairbanks AK Yes 4. Haines Borough+ AK Yes Yes Yes 5. Juneau AK Yes Yes Yes 6. Klawock AK Yes Yes Yes 7. Koyuk AK Yes Yes 8. Nome AK Yes Yes Yes 9. Nunam Iqua AK Yes 10. Palmer AK Yes Yes Yes 11. Petersburg AK Yes Yes 12. Sitka AK Yes Yes 13. Skagway Borough+ AK Yes Yes Yes 14. Unalaska AK Yes Yes 15. Utqiagvik (Barrow) AK Yes 16. Albertville AL Yes Yes Yes 17. Alexander City AL Yes Yes 18. Anniston AL Yes Yes Yes 19. Atmore AL Yes Yes Yes 20. Auburn AL Yes Yes 21. Bay Minette AL Yes 22. Bayou La Batre AL Yes Yes Yes 23. Bessemer AL Yes Yes 24. -
TNCO Levels and Ratio's
Canadian Intense method - ISO method - Ratio Canadian Intense/ISO Measured levels Declared levels Brand Tar Nicotine CO Tar Nicotine CO Tar Nicotine CO (mg/cig) (mg/cig) (mg/cig) (mg/cig) (mg/cig) (mg/cig) (CI/ISO) (CI/ISO) (CI/ISO) Marlboro Prime 26,1 1,7 40,0 1,0 0,1 2,0 26,1 17,2 20,0 Kent HD White 17,4 1,3 28,0 1,0 0,1 2,0 17,4 13,4 14,0 Peter Stuyvesant Silver 15,2 1,2 19,0 1,0 0,1 2,0 15,2 12,3 9,5 Karelia I 9,6 0,9 9,3 1,0 0,1 1,0 9,6 8,6 9,3 Davidoff Blue* 23,6 1,7 30,9 2,9 0,2 2,6 8,3 7,0 12,1 American Spirit Orange 20,5 2,1 18,4 3,0 0,4 4,0 6,8 5,1 4,6 Kent Surround Menthol 25,0 1,7 30,8 4,0 0,4 5,0 6,3 4,3 6,2 Marlboro Silver Blue 24,7 1,5 32,6 4,0 0,3 5,0 6,2 5,0 6,5 Karelia L (Blue) 17,6 1,7 14,1 3,0 0,3 2,0 5,9 5,6 7,1 Kent HD Silver 21,1 1,6 26,2 4,0 0,4 5,0 5,3 3,9 5,2 Peter Stuyvesant Blue* 20,2 1,6 21,7 4,0 0,4 5,0 5,1 4,7 4,3 Kent Surround Silver* 22,5 1,7 27,0 4,5 0,5 5,5 5,0 3,7 4,9 Templeton Blue 25,0 1,8 26,2 5,0 0,4 6,0 5,0 4,4 4,4 Belinda Filterkings 29,9 2,2 24,7 6,0 0,5 6,0 5,0 4,3 4,1 Silk Cut Purple 24,9 2,0 23,4 5,0 0,5 5,0 5,0 4,0 4,7 Boston White 23,3 1,6 25,3 5,0 0,3 6,0 4,7 5,5 4,2 Mark Adams No.